Anyone used this software before? Sounds quite interesting and works on the HD.
http://www.microsoft.com/tag/
Works very well.
I loaded it up a few weeks ago when it was announced.
It starts fine and accesses directly the camera. It searches automatically for tags and then launchs internet to connect to the tag.
I installed it this morning and seems to work pretty well. However I haven't seen any websites or posters with that on it, so it might be a while before we are actually able to use the software.
I to have just installed the app. I like the look of it. I guess we'll just have to wait and see how long before it becomes of use to us.
So useless, why use MS Tags if a worldwide standard - Barcodes - exists already for years - and works on mobile phones with reader software. Just another attempt by MS to waste money.
Lucas0511 said:
So useless, why use MS Tags if a worldwide standard - Barcodes - exists already for years - and works on mobile phones with reader software. Just another attempt by MS to waste money.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My thoughts exactly. We have a GREAT 2D-barcode standard QRCode (and to some degree DataMatrix), that's already widely used (by delivery companies, postal workers, public transit companies etc. etc.) and supported, works in black&white and is an open standard (ISO/IEC) that anyone can implement free of charge (Denso Wave has chosen not to exercise it's patent, other than to limit the use of the trademark term QR Code).
Microsoft advertises the technology by comparing the size of the resulting code, naturally a four-color code is smaller than a 1-bit implementation, but 2D barcodes are used to store very little information (shipment ID, URL, phone number etc.), so that's just stupid.
The only interesting thing is the fact that Microsoft tags require less image quality to be scanned successfully, but I for one have never had problems with that even with older phones (sub-VGA cameras), let alone modern ones.
It's nice to see interest in physical interfaces to mobile web like these grow, but I really don't think Microsoft Tags bring enough improvements to the table to warrant using them over standardized technology.
Just my $0.2
Thanks for your insight, quality posting. Sad thing is that few consumers are motivated to use barcodes. Offering rebate through them, like virtual coupons, might be a way to change that.
If MS would truly innovate, they would work on something like this, social tagging:
http://tonchidot.com/index_info.html
I agree with most of the comments questioning the usefulness of this app.
I must admit to actually liking it a lot - works well, simple interface, grabs pictures with the crappy HD camera very well.
BUT, I have never seen a MS Tag in the wild yet, maybe in a few years when I've moved to an iphone (ho ho) ...
When I initially read this, I thought it was ground breaking. However, I was under the illusion that it was using OCR to read whatever you take a photo of to intelligently derive tags and therefore referals to websites.
However, the OCR is only based on Microsoft barcodes. This is a very limited market.
Yet, again Microsoft taking over the world but I sense this will fall flat on it's face.
The standard barcode workaround may work, but how many film poster's or bus timetables (for example) do you know that have a barcode ? This strikes me to be more about physical consumer products than anything else.
Having been using QR Codes for a while now, I must admit I think MS tags are brilliant.
So many cameras on phones struggle with QR Codes, but MS tags can be easily read even when out of focus. There are other things I like about the tag: the ability to track the geolocation of where it was scanned (opt-in basis by people running the tag reader). On their site they have detailed info about just how poor some HTC cameras are when passing streams of data over to other apps - makes for interesting reading!
What I absolutely despise about it is
a) the fact that there is no SDK for it and making up tags using the web site is NOT an option for anybody but the hobyist
b) the fact that MS hasn't clarified whether or not they'd be charging for it
c) I'm not comfortable in leaving all the tracking data in the hands of one company
QR Codes have the benefit of not needing to be printed in colour, but MS tag has the benefit of being read easier using mobile phones.
I don't believe QR Codes will disappear but I do believe MS Tags will be successful. I certainly belive that there's room in the market for it, PROVIDED MS doesn't charge for it.
Skyfire 2.0 is the world’s first hybrid browser, using the best of the device’s native browser, and adding a cloud “booster engine” for extra features like video and social networking. It is our flagship go-forward product, as we’ve reported publicly for months, since our Android launch.
With that in mind, we are announcing that we will complete the phase out of our legacy v1.0 product on Windows Mobile and Symbian on December 31st, 2010 for remaining countries. This two-year old product used a “proxy browser” approach which is no longer our vision. It was a revolutionary product when introduced and offered for free, but the fast-moving mobile market has changed significantly since 2007, and as a small tech start-up, we need to keep innovating forward.
Our new 2.0 product is built for the next generation of smartphones and tablets with full support for html5, offline browsing, javascript, WebKit, and full-screen video. The 2.0 architecture is exponentially more data efficient as well, and better fits the technology roadmaps of our B2B customers (wireless carriers and handset makers).
This was a very difficult decision for us. We put our hearts and souls into the 1.0 product and greatly value the many Skyfire fans who used the product and provided us with invaluable feedback during this intensive research & development phase of our company. We experimented with ways to charge for the product (in certain international test markets) so that existing Windows Mobile and Symbian users could continue to use the service, but the payment mechanisms were very cumbersome and the piracy rates were so high on those OS platforms that we could not make it work. More importantly, we faced a decision point: If we were to begin charging money for a product, we had to commit to multiple years of support and enhancement of the product. It would not be the ethical thing to do to start down that path, given that we would not expect enough revenue to make that sustainable on the legacy 1.0 product, and we can no longer subsidize it. The right thing we decided was to focus on 2.0 and beyond.
We do expect to bring Skyfire 2.0 to additional platforms, and have begun discussions with some carriers and OEMs to decide which will be our next OS. Microsoft’s new Windows Phone 7 and Nokia’s MeeGo platform are both shaping up as platforms with a lot of potential and the recent launch of the new Blackberry OS 6 with a WebKit browser core makes for interesting potential for a future release of Skyfire 2.0. We value feedback from our users, so please let us know what platform you would like to see Skyfire on next and just as importantly let your wireless carrier know that you want Skyfire!
Thanks to all of our fans, new and old, for their support. We’re a small 35-person development shop, so all the enthusiasm for Skyfire has been gratifying for all of the engineers here in Mountain View.
Jeff Glueck, CEO
[EDIT]
I was entering rant mode but it's just not worth it... Still what was the point of creating yet another topic on this subject (and again in Soft Dev...)?
Yes I know but I didnt see that other thread that the other person had made. So I made this one instead.
Well, it was crap in the end anyway.
Nothing of value was lost.
Mango is enough to compete well against other major platforms. But I personally believe they need to market more. Android didn't quite get popular even with good updates and a handful of devices. But it wasn't until the DROID ad that it started to penetrate the market. Everything is solid, and it even beats Android in customer satisfaction(57 %) but the scary fact is, it still lack brand awareness.
The youtube channel and the videos produced are excellent in showing off its elegance and unique features but they fail to present it on TV, Billboards, etc.
http://www.youtube.com/user/windowsphone
C'mon Microsoft! You got everything, now use some marketing skills to get your brand out and market share up!
maybe the one thing they don't have is marketing skills?
Aerik said:
Mango is enough to compete well against other major platforms. But I personally believe they need to market more. Android didn't quite get popular even with good updates and a handful of devices. But it wasn't until the DROID ad that it started to penetrate the market. Everything is solid, and it even beats Android in customer satisfaction(57 %) but the scary fact is, it still lack brand awareness.
The youtube channel and the videos produced are excellent in showing off its elegance and unique features but they fail to present it on TV, Billboards, etc.
C'mon Microsoft! You got everything, now use your marketing skills to get your brand out and market share up!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, we'll see how currently complete mango is with general smartphone users.
Here's a test:
I live in a city and just bought a Windows Phone. Cool!
Once I'm done class, I've got to visit a museum in the core of the city. Should be fun. Let's get some directions.
Current Location ->to-> Royal Ontario Museum
Cool, it's showing me driving directions. I'm not driving there.
Where are the public transit directions? I live in a city, where the hell are my public transit directions?
No public transit directions.
So I call my friend asking them if their smartphone has transit directions. Yep, their iphone and android are hooked up to google maps. So I visit the app marketplace to download google maps. But I can't. So I visit the google maps website on IE, but google maps is banned on windows phone devices.
So I look for an alternative maps app on the marketplace - one that has transit. But there are none for my area.
-
Seriously, recommending a windows phone is hard once people tell you they need their smartphone to "do what my current smartphone does."
Because lots of people need things like public transit directions, for example. I mean, a huge market for smartphone users lies in metropolitan cities.
Bing Maps, and the Windows phone as a result:
1) doesnt support public transit, and
2) is highly unsupported outside of the US.
I love the windows phone OS, but MS is taking their time, and until they catch up, the phone simply doesn't provide a number of critical features. Not 'fluff' features, but important make-or-break features.
I'm aware Nokia Maps is 'coming'. But until it has, and until it proves itself to be comparable to google maps, users switching from other smartphones to Mango will feel like they're downgrading in some areas.
Users who switch from android to iOS, and iOS to android, don't feel that - they get, at the very least, basic critical map and navigation functions thanks to partnerships with google. MS's obsession with the underdeveloped BING service is hurting the windows phone (and imo will hurt Windows 8 as well) since you're forced to using bing within the OS whether you want to or not).
google maps does not an OS make - or break. There are other things that make WP7 worthwhile, like local scout, Zune, Xbox, Office. Each platform has their pluses and minuses, none of them was born complete.
If I wanted to control my Xbox from an iphone or android I couldnt but could on WP7 (when the app is released), does that make those OS's less functional to their owners?
And really, continually bringing up the lack of google applications on WP7 is pointless, why not ask google why they block WP7 users from their services? MS just released Hotmail for android, why isnt google as considerate of their services USERS and provide their services to all smartphone platforms, rather than try and punish users of WP7? Gits.
ammarmalik said:
maybe the one thing they don't have is marketing skills?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But I so would've bought windows after seeing this advertisement:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sforhbLiwLA&feature=related
And let's be frank everyone else would after seeing Ballmer's performance. More iconic than developers developers DEVELOPERS
efjay said:
google maps does not an OS make - or break. There are other things that make WP7 worthwhile, like local scout, Zune, Xbox, Office. Each platform has their pluses and minuses, none of them was born complete.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Local scout, only works as advertised in the US.
You also have to change all your settings to US on your phone in order to perform bing map searches outside of NA and UK. Pretty user friendly.
If I wanted to control my Xbox from an iphone or android I couldnt but could on WP7 (when the app is released), does that make those OS's less functional to their owners?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Xbox Live functionality is not a 'critical' feature I was referring to. I'm talking about things like transit directions, worldwide map search support, audio file support, email inbox search, etc.
Also, re: "(when the app is released)" - my understanding is people don't buy phones based on what apps it may have 6-12 months from now.
Can we NOT turn this into a bash wp7 thread like the countless others and actually discuss how MS could improve their marketing stratergy?
They hired Brandon Foy who did the gorgeous wp7 fan video. They should have him do a flashy 30 second spot with the HTC Titan
madmaximillian said:
Yeah, we'll see how currently complete mango is with general smartphone users.
Here's a test:
I live in a city and just bought a Windows Phone. Cool!
Once I'm done class, I've got to visit a museum in the core of the city. Should be fun. Let's get some directions.
Current Location ->to-> Royal Ontario Museum
Cool, it's showing me driving directions. I'm not driving there.
Where are the public transit directions? I live in a city, where the hell are my public transit directions?
No public transit directions.
So I call my friend asking them if their smartphone has transit directions. Yep, their iphone and android are hooked up to google maps. So I visit the app marketplace to download google maps. But I can't. So I visit the google maps website on IE, but google maps is banned on windows phone devices.
So I look for an alternative maps app on the marketplace - one that has transit. But there are none for my area.
-
Seriously, recommending a windows phone is hard once people tell you they need their smartphone to "do what my current smartphone does."
Because lots of people need things like public transit directions, for example. I mean, a huge market for smartphone users lies in metropolitan cities.
Bing Maps, and the Windows phone as a result:
1) doesnt support public transit, and
2) is highly unsupported outside of the US.
I love the windows phone OS, but MS is taking their time, and until they catch up, the phone simply doesn't provide a number of critical features. Not 'fluff' features, but important make-or-break features.
I'm aware Nokia Maps is 'coming'. But until it has, and until it proves itself to be comparable to google maps, users switching from other smartphones to Mango will feel like they're downgrading in some areas.
Users who switch from android to iOS, and iOS to android, don't feel that - they get, at the very least, basic critical map and navigation functions thanks to partnerships with google. MS's obsession with the underdeveloped BING service is hurting the windows phone (and imo will hurt Windows 8 as well) since you're forced to using bing within the OS whether you want to or not).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really, if MS want to success in this world and earn big bucks, they have to look after the needs in different places instead of just in US.
Being international means the service has to be accessible from anywhere, and the information should be fully descriptive in any countries. (esp. the maps and search engines)
Google has invested vast amount of money in placing servers in different continents and gathering information for its international class services, e.g. mail, maps, search engines. Where are MS's efforts? I would like to see.
Smartphones do require a good infrastructure as a support. Apple and Android uses google services, and MS use Bing services. Is Bing services well structured? If not, should they either improve themselves straightaway or let people use other services temporarily?
---------- Post added at 12:54 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:53 AM ----------
sayonical said:
Can we NOT turn this into a bash wp7 thread like the countless others and actually discuss how MS could improve their marketing stratergy?
They hired Brandon Foy who did the gorgeous wp7 fan video. They should have him do a flashy 30 second spot with the HTC Titan
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Improving its service availability in the world is already their best marketing stratergy.
henry084 said:
Really, if MS want to success in this world and earn big bucks, they have to look after the needs in different places instead of just in US.
Being international means the service has to be accessible from anywhere, and the information should be fully descriptive in any countries. (esp. the maps and search engines)
Google has invested vast amount of money in placing servers in different continents and gathering information for its international class services, e.g. mail, maps, search engines. Where are MS's efforts? I would like to see.
Smartphones do require a good infrastructure as a support. Apple and Android uses google services, and MS use Bing services. Is Bing services well structured? If not, should they either improve themselves straightaway or let people use other services temporarily?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed. MS seems to be pairing with Nokia for their maps service, but still Nokia has even worse international data. They have better maps, but MUCH worse directions, hardly any locations information, and Nokia software isn't linked to anything (such as your contact lists).
Google services are great because they link with each other, and are dependable and work anywhere. They are a crucial part of what makes today's smartphones 'smart' phones.
sayonical said:
Can we NOT turn this into a bash wp7 thread like the countless others and actually discuss how MS could improve their marketing stratergy?
They hired Brandon Foy who did the gorgeous wp7 fan video. They should have him do a flashy 30 second spot with the HTC Titan
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Word of mouth counts as marketing, in a way
Plus, if WP7 gets features that people are used to, people will be more inclined to switch. I know many poeple who know what WP7 is, but won't switch because it 'feels' to them like the first gen iphone. The iphone 1 was great, but you wouldn't switch from an iphone 4 or 3gs to one. And that's how people feel about the windows phone - it's cool, but it doesn't have the features that will make switching to it possible.
Madmaxmillian, I didn't know that. Thanks.
No problem
You're right, word of mouth is a form of marketing. I know because based on my word of mouth, 10 people have switched to WP and another 3 plan to do so, 9 of those are from Android, the others are from the Pre and feature phones.
But, since this is a marketing thread about what MS should do to gain more awareness of the OS (not sure how Android and iphone keep coming up in threads that have absolutely nothing to do with either of them) let's talk about that. I will however wager $20 that the normal handful of windows phone opponents will seek to make this anything but what the thread is about.
The stuff that Brandon Foy is doing is great in a hip, upbeat sense. But, it's far too busy for the average television commercial, at least in the U.S. It would behoove MS to have something that is more straightforward and to the point.
A series of spots showing various features of the phone. Show what's unique about the phone, UI, Live tiles, Hub Concept, Integration. Show this with "real people" in "real situations" using the phone's features.
A Voiceover as a girl sits in her room at her computer. She pops up and starts throwing on clothes.
VO: "A night out with a few friends."
She taps the Bing button and brings up Local Scout. She taps an event.
VO: "Bing Local Scout can help you finds great things to see, do, eat, and drink in any area. And, when you do, you can get in touch with the people who are important to you anywhere, anytime... on Facebook, Instant Messenger, and Text"
How about...?
Show the switch to text from Facebook
VO: "All in the same conversation without ever leaving the messaging hub."
Sounds great!
She steps out of the door of her urban apartment. It's night time. She doesn't walk but somehow moves down the street, the world around her blurs by at hyperspeed. The Phone is in constant view of the camera.
VO: "And, if you need to keep in touch with all the people who are important to you in one convenient place, you've got groups for that."
The Groups Tile shows a kaleidoscope of pics then flips to show "New Messages". She taps the Groups Hub on her phone that reads" The Crew/Guys" She scrolls through to show the people in her group then hits sms.
Text: On my way.
She stops. A dress in a store window with an expensive price tag catches her eye.
VO: "Something catch your eye? Let Bing Vision help you find what you want."
She uses Bing Vision on the tag to pull up a better deal elsewhere. She smiles. That's going to be her new dress.
Again she moves without walking, city lights strafing around her. Suddenly, the world seems to slow down and goes back to normal as she has arrived at her destination.
She opens the door and goes in and...
SURPRISE!!!
A large group of friends shower her with confetti as she enters. A great big smile, a laugh, and hugs.
"Windows Phone. Put People first."
Whatever. Something like that.
For non-US or countries that don't currently have access to Bing services there would be a showcasing of other features.
Also, you could have spots show off several features w/ voiceover and end with the voiceover saying:
VO: "Oh. And, apps... yeah we got those too."
You would then go from a TIGHT shot on the famous Wall of Apps to a quick PULL OUT and REVEAL of the thousands of apps the platform currently has.
Anyway... something along those lines or variations thereof. The main thing is to show WHAT the phone can do and what is unique about it.
madmaximillian said:
Agreed. MS seems to be pairing with Nokia for their maps service, but still Nokia has even worse international data. They have better maps, but MUCH worse directions, hardly any locations information, and Nokia software isn't linked to anything (such as your contact lists).
Google services are great because they link with each other, and are dependable and work anywhere. They are a crucial part of what makes today's smartphones 'smart' phones.
Word of mouth counts as marketing, in a way
Plus, if WP7 gets features that people are used to, people will be more inclined to switch. I know many poeple who know what WP7 is, but won't switch because it 'feels' to them like the first gen iphone. The iphone 1 was great, but you wouldn't switch from an iphone 4 or 3gs to one. And that's how people feel about the windows phone - it's cool, but it doesn't have the features that will make switching to it possible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Better maps is already better than maps with limited information, now Bing maps is still rather empty in East Asia region. (They have just fixed the Japan ones recently.) I hope they can combine those two together to form a better one.
For me, like Mango which can filter your contact lists is already fine as far as I can filter out the phone list for use, since a smartphone is still a phone. I have my facebook acc, e-mail acc, and dial lists. I don't want to search things in a mixed pool as it is inefficient, also I don't want to reconstruct the whole list as the work is enormous. (Just imagine when you have 500 entries in your Facebook account, 200 entries in your e-mail/MSN account and 150 entries in your phone book, then you will know how painful it can be.)
---------- Post added at 12:20 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:02 PM ----------
Wyn6 said:
You're right, word of mouth is a form of marketing. I know because based on my word of mouth, 10 people have switched to WP and another 3 plan to do so, 9 of those are from Android, the others are from the Pre and feature phones.
But, since this is a marketing thread about what MS should do to gain more awareness of the OS (not sure how Android and iphone keep coming up in threads that have absolutely nothing to do with either of them) let's talk about that. I will however wager $20 that the normal handful of windows phone opponents will seek to make this anything but what the thread is about.
The stuff that Brandon Foy is doing is great in a hip, upbeat sense. But, it's far too busy for the average television commercial, at least in the U.S. It would behoove MS to have something that is more straightforward and to the point.
A series of spots showing various features of the phone. Show what's unique about the phone, UI, Live tiles, Hub Concept, Integration. Show this with "real people" in "real situations" using the phone's features.
A Voiceover as a girl sits in her room at her computer. She pops up and starts throwing on clothes.
VO: "A night out with a few friends."
She taps the Bing button and brings up Local Scout. She taps an event.
VO: "Bing Local Scout can help you finds great things to see, do, eat, and drink in any area. And, when you do, you can get in touch with the people who are important to you anywhere, anytime... on Facebook, Instant Messenger, and Text"
How about...?
Show the switch to text from Facebook
VO: "All in the same conversation without ever leaving the messaging hub."
Sounds great!
She steps out of the door of her urban apartment. It's night time. She doesn't walk but somehow moves down the street, the world around her blurs by at hyperspeed. The Phone is in constant view of the camera.
VO: "And, if you need to keep in touch with all the people who are important to you in one convenient place, you've got groups for that."
The Groups Tile shows a kaleidoscope of pics then flips to show "New Messages". She taps the Groups Hub on her phone that reads" The Crew/Guys" She scrolls through to show the people in her group then hits sms.
Text: On my way.
She stops. A dress in a store window with an expensive price tag catches her eye.
VO: "Something catch your eye? Let Bing Vision help you find what you want."
She uses Bing Vision on the tag to pull up a better deal elsewhere. She smiles. That's going to be her new dress.
Again she moves without walking, city lights strafing around her. Suddenly, the world seems to slow down and goes back to normal as she has arrived at her destination.
She opens the door and goes in and...
SURPRISE!!!
A large group of friends shower her with confetti as she enters. A great big smile, a laugh, and hugs.
"Windows Phone. Put People first."
Whatever. Something like that.
For non-US or countries that don't currently have access to Bing services there would be a showcasing of other features.
Also, you could have spots show off several features w/ voiceover and end with the voiceover saying:
VO: "Oh. And, apps... yeah we got those too."
You would then go from a TIGHT shot on the famous Wall of Apps to a quick PULL OUT and REVEAL of the thousands of apps the platform currently has.
Anyway... something along those lines or variations thereof. The main thing is to show WHAT the phone can do and what is unique about it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can tell, without the backup of such services can be fatal to a smartphone, esp. when people are relying on maps and search engines nowadays. iOS and Android can success because of this. MS would fail if they are still limiting their services in US, and WP7 would be just an American pride, like the sports car Corvette.
I think what Microsoft really should rely on is the features that are directly built in Windows Phone. Sure, Android and iOS can do a lot, most definitely still more than WP7 can do. But they heavily depend on apps. You need apps for every single **** you wanna do with these devices. The out of the box experience is pretty low in my opinion. That's where WP7 makes the difference. And that's what Microsoft should show people.
As more people around the world trade in their desktop PCs for smartphones and tablets, businesses are looking for ways to improve their approach to enterprise mobility. For many, this trend presents an opportunity to wring more productivity out of their workforce by allowing employees to use their personal devices on the job. Organizations that employ bring-your-own-device policies often report higher levels of employee satisfaction and performance. To optimize these efforts, however, businesses often need to develop their own software that is customized to meet their staff's specific needs. These circumstances have led to a boom in internal enterprise mobility projects, driving the need for better development and quality assurance practices within companies. Which is why, interest in enterprise mobility will only increase in the foreseeable future.
Mobile device adoption rates continue to be robust, and more resources for in-house development are available than ever before. For instance, last year Samsung announced the debut of its latest software development kit. Similarly, many businesses that wish to take full advantage of this resources and bring newer products to the market will need to bolster their internal programming and QA teams, as in-house projects are better suited to address the specific demands of enterprise end users. Keeping an eye on offshoring trends is a must.
Another trend that company leaders should take note of is the rising interest in offshoring. These practices have seen their popularity increase in recent years, as more organizations look to reduce their operational costs by outsourcing software development or testing responsibilities to overseas teams. This trend may be contributing to the growing number of tech professionals residing in regions outside of North America. According to InfoQ contributor Abel Avram's analysis of a recent IDC study, there are now more than 36 million professional developers, hobbyists and workers with ICT skills spread across the globe. Of those individuals, approximately 11 million work primarily as software developers, with 37 percent residing in the Asia-Pacific region.
Meanwhile, fewer than one-third are currently working in North or South America. While the United States has the largest share of both professional and hobbyist software developers of any single country, China and India are not too far behind, holding the second- and third-place rankings, respectively. With the race to accumulate tech-savvy employees gathering steam, taking advantage of every region's talent pool will be vital moving forward. However, it is no secret that there are many logistical challenges to managing application development and deployment since testing teams are now spread across the world.
Time zone differences, in particular, can prevent individuals from sharing updates and providing new information with programmers and testers located in other countries. If these circumstances are not addressed redundancies and oversights may occur, derailing a company's production schedule. A high-quality test management system will alleviate these concerns, however, by providing a single portal for team members to upload important test cases, scripts, metrics, reports and other information. For example, if software testers located overseas want to share the results of their latest tests with on-premises employees, they can simply upload that information in real time through a test management tool. Those records will then be readily available to in-house programmers. These capabilities reduce operational headaches for QA management and ensure that a production stays on track.
EMM to Manage Enterprise Mobility Architecture
It is true that the world has gone mobile. Businesses have started adopting mobile strategies to stay abreast with the growing technologies. Mobile devices are used by enterprises nowadays to streamline their business operations. It provides employees the flexibility to conduct business operations such as sending emails, reviewing orders, accessing business apps, etc. on the go. While the use of mobile phones in business has tremendous benefits, it also throws up challenges like securing business data and maintaining privacy. Enterprise Mobility Management companies like 42Gears offer platform agnostic solutions to deal with the challenges faced by enterprises wanting to go mobile. It offers device and app provisioning, OS configuration, remote wipe, remote viewing, application management, remote file sharing and more.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is speedily turning into one in all the foremost in style topics in each business and science and a lot of leading technical school corporations are showing interest in AI investment. Google’s $400 million acquisition of DeepMind may be a prime example of mainstream AI application. A study conducted by the Mckinsey international Institute discovered that tech giants like Baidu and Google spent between $20 billion to $30 billion on AI last year, with 90th of this spent on R&D and preparation, and 100% on AI acquisitions. The rate at that AI is increasing is gaining momentum. A similar study determined that AI growth caused thrice the maximum amount investment in 2016 – nearly $40 billion – because it did solely 3 years past. Business sectors like health care, education, and finance are investing in AI, but mobile is one of the most promising areas for AI.
AI and mobile apps
AI and IoT truly go hand in hand, interact with each other somehow.
There is a clear intersection between the Internet of Things (IoT) and Artificial Intelligence (AI). IoT is about connecting machines and making use of the data generated from those machines. AI is about simulating intelligent behaviour in machines of all kinds. Clearly an overlap.
Why AI and Big Data for Creating Personal Shopping Assistant App?
Well, not anymore! Thanks to AI and Big Data technologies, the shopping world is about to get revolutionized with the introduction of virtual shopping assistant apps for everyone! In this article, we’re going to talk about how these cutting edge technologies help in creating these user-centric apps, and whether it’s the right time to start your own app that helps shopaholics around the world with their shopping.
Artificial Intelligence _ the next big thing
No doubt about it. Artificial Intelligence is being incorporated in all kinds of fields. One of the most common example is eCommerce stores and customer service.
AI is becoming smarter and more intuitive. This means that it can interact with visitors at a more personalized level, which will ultimately lead to more conversions.
I can't wait to see further breakthroughs in this domain.