{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
So, I'm thinking, I want better battery life and i don want my stuff to be slow. I accomplished half of. that no pprob. I'm gpintotest battery life tomorrow. But here's the settings and the funniest benchmark EVEREVER
Sent from my A100 using xda premium
Nice lol
For battery life I run 816/216, conservative, -125mv on all. Gives smoothness with extra battery life. IMO.
Romman0 said:
Nice lol
For battery life I run 816/216, conservative, -125mv on all. Gives smoothness with extra battery life. IMO.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For battery life I run my nexus 7.
OK besides that I ran no UV Lionheart and 816/216 auto brightness array that's tuned a little dim for my own build. WiFi timeout 15 minutes. I get an average from gsam of a little over 8 hours though that's optimistic.
I want a new tab for battery, nexus 7 actually OK?
Sent from my A100 using xda premium
das_webos_transformer said:
I want a new tab for battery, nexus 7 actually OK?
Sent from my A100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It beats the hell out of the a100 for sure. Kicked the a100 out the door, it wasn't good for much besides a door stop after the nexus 7 and the 10" thrive.
You gotta give the a100 props though. It was one of the first 7in tabs not to suck! Evolution took it a step further and the base design of this tab has reoccurred in a few places, RAZR Max, notice the corners, some other grabs have the camera there. This tab was, is and will continue to be awesome. Besides the crap battery and the random bricking which has essentially stopped, as far as I know.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda app-developers app
das_webos_transformer said:
You gotta give the a100 props though. It was one of the first 7in tabs not to suck! Evolution took it a step further and the base design of this tab has reoccurred in a few places, RAZR Max, notice the corners, some other grabs have the camera there. This tab was, is and will continue to be awesome. Besides the crap battery and the random bricking which has essentially stopped, as far as I know.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes its a decent tab that is still quite usable, but having a nexus 7 makes it useless in thus household now and has been moved to a new home. It had its good and bad points but for me for every flaw the a100 has and even those that devs had to correct because Acer wouldn't, means I will never buy an Acer product again. Google devices for me now as I don't wish to continue being forced to create new ROMs for a device because the manufacturer decided to ditch it.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Hahaha..... so, sooo many devices have been like that.
Sent from my A100 using xda premium
My best battery...ever...I've never had these kind of stats till I played with lulzactive and killed wireless before sleep. 816/216
Performance wasn't too bad actually, but here is the benchmark.
And this is my performance tuned lulzactive...4-6 hours battery. lol
Yuck!
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda app-developers app
das_webos_transformer said:
Yuck!
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What? Lol for my uses this is pretty good.
Sent via G2x on temasek b135.2 w/faux kernel v54
justjackyl said:
What? Lol for my uses this is pretty good.
Sent via G2x on temasek b135.2 w/faux kernel v54
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Considering how fast the a100 got in jb those scores are still a very usable tablet. Maybe not the fastest out there, but faster then ICS was.
Tapatalked from my Nexus 7 - Kuroikaze AOSP
pio_masaki said:
Considering how fast the a100 got in jb those scores are still a very usable tablet. Maybe not the fastest out there, but faster then ICS was.
Tapatalked from my Nexus 7 - Kuroikaze AOSP
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I believe its possible to go faster. But im trying to find that happy medium of what works with battery and useable performance for my needs.
Do i know i can go faster, ya, but my point is to not kill half the battery with one benchmark, lol
I wish i had a stock score for comparison,i supposed if i looked..lol
Sent via G2x on temasek b135.2 w/faux kernel v54
I know it goes faster, mine did its just not usable in that level of tuning plus its a huge strain on the hardware to push that far, 1.7 GHz is a 70% push in speed and voltage increases are getting scary at that point. Benchmark increases become smaller in relation to speed increases as well, meaning we're exceeding its safety range. Same for GPU oc, pushing it much father doesn't yield much more for benchmarks either but adds more strain then is really needed. What good is a tablet running over 5k in quadrant if it can't run on battery more then a couple hours?
Tapatalked from my Nexus 7 - Kuroikaze AOSP
Sick nasty benchmarks. I did a benchmark on my old phone, not a quadrant but a geekbench. It scored a 10... in comparison, my a100 scored 1200... the dual core along with the fact its a tegra and coupled with the gig of ram make for all around good experiences on job. Imo
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda app-developers app
Related
What your Undervolting settings guys ?
Me:
1350mhz:1225mv
1200mhz:1125mv
920mhz:960mv
700mhz:860mv
350mhz:760mv
230mhz(only on Leankernel):710mv
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App
Those look pretty aggressive, I'm going to try them out and see if they work for me. Thanks for the post
I'm using franco's
1200:1075mv
700:925mv
I wish I could go lower for the 700 but 900mv instantly freeze
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
I'm using the 1.4Ghz oc uv kernel.
Here is my undervolting setting.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Here's mine, your were slightly to aggressive for my phone, too about 5 reboots before I could change them lol
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App
The proof
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App
I'm not saying that your lying, every device can handle undervolting/over clocking differently for example on my desire HD I could keep it at 2Ghz all the time while most people couldn't go past 1.8
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App
Could someone comment on the real life battery life benefits to undervolting? Since most of the power consumption is the display, I'm wondering how 'worth it' it is. Thanks
Keeping heat down and extending life of phone. The uv helps more in that regard really than giving you more bang for your charge.
Sent from my Nexus in Texas.
kevinaminaator said:
Could someone comment on the real life battery life benefits to undervolting? Since most of the power consumption is the display, I'm wondering how 'worth it' it is. Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The real world batter life gain is very very close to none. I'd say that it isn't worth it, but let the kids play if they want to
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
io53 said:
The real world batter life gain is very very close to none. I'd say that it isn't worth it, but let the kids play if they want to
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 on this. I've yet to see any proof of that the small gain even can be measured.
Sent from my HTC Desire HD using XDA App
On my desire HD I could get about 30 minutes more out of it on my Gnex I gay about 15 minutes more
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App
I dont mind about the battery life(and seem to be very little change)
BUT the temperature rising while playing 3D game is much better than stock voltage.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App
@rbiter said:
Keeping heat down and extending life of phone. The uv helps more in that regard really than giving you more bang for your charge.
Sent from my Nexus in Texas.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Undervolting can lower the life of your device just as much as heat. Excessive anything is bad (except battery life).
I, too, stopped messing around with UV; just always caused weird instabilities or crashes.
Im using the default UV on imo's leankernel with interactiveX
Are the advantages/gains really that minimal? I mean thinking about it logically, it should help shouldn't it?
I was all set to lower mine even more but you guys have me thinking twice now lol...
heat is the most affected thing tho, and a phones life isn't a huge concern for me as i switch phones in July and january
cordell507 said:
heat is the most affected thing tho, and a phones life isn't a huge concern for me as i switch phones in July and january
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The number one heat sources for these devices are the radios. No amount of undervolting is going to change that.
This is what Ezekeel (GLaDOS kernel dev) typed at rootzwiki:
Regarding Custom Voltage, note that the CPU in the GN uses Smartreflex to automatically determine proper voltages for all CPU frequency states, so a manual UV should not be necessary (check the calibration with 'dmesg | grep sr_'). The voltage values set with Custom Voltage are the nominal voltages which are used as a starting point for the calibration. Forcing the nominal voltages below the calibrated voltages determined automatically by Smartreflex can have adverse effects. So be warned! The main purpose of Custom Voltage is as a companion for Live OC so users can raise the voltages to stabilize higher OC values.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://rootzwiki.com/topic/14685-kernel29-jan-glados-v16/page__view__findpost__p__428886
http://rootzwiki.com/topic/14685-kernel29-jan-glados-v16/page__st__200
I don't know about ya'll, but my phone only feels the heat when playing games or excessive hspa dl'ing. It is much harder to know you get more juice from uv'ing on a phone. Even laptop users usually say the gain is not worth mentioning.
Sent from my Nexus in Texas.
I just returned to stock via ODIN to see if my battery life is better. The stock FPS that I'm getting on stock kernel is roughly 30. This is a deal breaker for me. Anyone else noticing this limit on their devices who are on stock?
Something seems wrong, my phone is much smoother than that. You prob have a live wallpaper running which don't work right with this phone and makes the home screen choppy. Try a static wallpaper.
Mike's also maxing out at 30-fps but it removes this limit with modded kernels.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
RogerPodacter said:
Something seems wrong, my phone is much smoother than that. You prob have a live wallpaper running which don't work right with this phone and makes the home screen choppy. Try a static wallpaper.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just restore stock. Everything is 100% stock aside from the wallpaper which is the ics gradient.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Ascertion said:
Mike's also maxing out at 30-fps but it removes this limit with modded kernels.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried each kernel and my battery life is terrible. I'm on stock because I heard it had the best battery but not overly happy with performance compared to my sgsii.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Overstew said:
I just restore stock. Everything is 100% stock aside from the wallpaper which is the ics gradient.
I tried each kernel and my battery life is terrible. I'm on stock because I heard it had the best battery but not overly happy with performance compared to my sgsii.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Doesn't morfic have a Trinity kernel for the sprint gnex now? If so try it. I've been using his exp. Alpha 1 for two days and have been getting amazing battery life. 5 hour screen on time. Oh , and everything is running great, no choppiness at all
sent from my Nexus Prime using XDA premium
There is no fps cap.
No kernel dev has removed any fps cap that never existed. They may increase the gpu clock speed, but as for a cap...nope.
The difference between all Galaxy Nexus wise is not the kernel, it is the ramdisk. So Sprint isn't running some radically different kernel.
Kernel source can be obtained from AOSP. Type git log and notice that there are no Sprint fps limiting commits.
What are you even using to show you this limit and what exactly are you claiming is capped? Watching video, recording video, just using the phone?
I am a little confused by the statement.
Run antutu or any real graphics benchmark and see that its 60fps
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
ChongoDroid said:
Run antutu or any real graphics benchmark and see that its 60fps
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I ran quadrant and it is 30 FPS on both graphics tests. The game beats maxes out at 30 fps. N64oid maxes out at 30fps.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Screenies to show it's maxing out at 30fps.
(Top left here, it states 30/30 fps. The left number shows the fps it's running on, the right number is the average fps.)
Right below 30, it keeps showing right at 30/29.
29/30 again, switching between the two.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Knowing that the kernel is where fps caps would take place, I decided to (for the sake of science) boot the Sprint kernel on my Verizon device.
Quadrant is a piss poor test because it is fps limited in some tests by the software renderer on devices with SGX GPU. You can delete it, but don't fool yourself, it doesn't = performance gained.
adrynalyne said:
Knowing that the kernel is where fps caps would take place, I decided to (for the sake of science) boot the Sprint kernel on my Verizon device.
Quadrant is a piss poor test because it is fps limited in some tests by the software renderer on devices with SGX GPU. You can delete it, but don't fool yourself, it doesn't = performance gained.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How can I get n64oid and beats to remove this 30fps cap? Idk why ur quadrant is getting more than 30 fps. Maybe it's just the sprint variant?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Overstew said:
How can I get n64oid and beats to remove this 30fps cap? Idk why ur quadrant is getting more than 30 fps. Maybe it's just the sprint variant?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What would be different between the variants that would create an fps change?
As for your emulator, I don't know.
adrynalyne said:
What would be different between the variants that would create an fps change?
As for your emulator, I don't know.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Does beats run faster than 30 on your device?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Overstew said:
Does beats run faster than 30 on your device?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't have it. It is a free app? I am not seeing it right off the bat.
Keep in mind that you are at 720p. The 30 fps you are seeing could just be the limit the hardware has. Some things do indeed cap at 30 fps but it is not due to any artificial cap in place.
nory82688 said:
Doesn't morfic have a Trinity kernel for the sprint gnex now? If so try it. I've been using his exp. Alpha 1 for two days and have been getting amazing battery life. 5 hour screen on time. Oh , and everything is running great, no choppiness at all
sent from my Nexus Prime using XDA premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the trinity kernel works very well on the sprint gn. its the same kernel(instead of a kernel for each device) on all the different versions of the gn. one kernel to rule them all!
I'm running cm9 with franco an she's super smooth like butter... better than my sgs2 sprint btw.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Wow that certainly looks like it has a 30fps cap. Where the HELL is that coming from...and why?
RogerPodacter said:
Wow that certainly looks like it has a 30fps cap. Where the HELL is that coming from...and why?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Idk. Lol I swear everything I try is right at 30. It appears to only be on stock though.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
I just came back to the Epic 4G Touch after having a Galaxy Nexus for a bit (bought one at launch and I'm selling it now) and damn it feels good to have this phone again.
I really wanted to love the GNex... especially the software buttons... but the battery life was complete sh** (I was lucky to get 8-10 hours) and certain things just weren't as smooth. Not to mention not being able to use my favorite live wallpapers because while everything runs like butter on the E4GT, it'd cause a very noticeable stutter/lag in the UI on the GNex. Oh, and the camera on the GNex is also crap in comparison.
Anyhoo... those of you that are running the leaked 4.0.x ROMs, how's the battery life?
I'm just fine using ADW EX until the 4.0 update hits... at which point I'll immediately install Apex Pro again... but I hope they don't wait until after the Galaxy S3 hits to push out the OTA to our phones.
Ryjabo said:
I just came back to the Epic 4G Touch after having a Galaxy Nexus for a bit (bought one at launch and I'm selling it now) and damn it feels good to have this phone again.
I really wanted to love the GNex... especially the software buttons... but the battery life was complete sh** (I was lucky to get 8-10 hours) and certain things just weren't as smooth. Not to mention not being able to use my favorite live wallpapers because while everything runs like butter on the E4GT, it'd cause a very noticeable stutter/lag in the UI on the GNex. Oh, and the camera on the GNex is also crap in comparison.
Anyhoo... those of you that are running the leaked 4.0.x ROMs, how's the battery life?
I'm just fine using ADW EX until the 4.0 update hits... at which point I'll immediately install Apex Pro again... but I hope they don't wait until after the Galaxy S3 hits to push out the OTA to our phones.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Battery life has been getting alot better! Try Venums Boa rom and the Blu Kuban. Theyre some of the best ive used
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Welcome back!
Another great rom is Wicked Sendsations from Dazed. Its fast, smooth, and beautifally themed. Im currently running it.
Ryjabo said:
I just came back to the Epic 4G Touch after having a Galaxy Nexus for a bit (bought one at launch and I'm selling it now) and damn it feels good to have this phone again.
I really wanted to love the GNex... especially the software buttons... but the battery life was complete sh** (I was lucky to get 8-10 hours) and certain things just weren't as smooth. Not to mention not being able to use my favorite live wallpapers because while everything runs like butter on the E4GT, it'd cause a very noticeable stutter/lag in the UI on the GNex. Oh, and the camera on the GNex is also crap in comparison.
Anyhoo... those of you that are running the leaked 4.0.x ROMs, how's the battery life?
I'm just fine using ADW EX until the 4.0 update hits... at which point I'll immediately install Apex Pro again... but I hope they don't wait until after the Galaxy S3 hits to push out the OTA to our phones.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yoooo try ParanoidAndroid!! That rom/port is amazing battery life if also outstanding cuz it has kobridge kernel tweak already baked into it
Sent from my PaRAnO!D aNDr0id!
You took a big jump I think if I had a gnex I wouldve stayed It has pretty good developing and much more but welcome back
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
qubanaso said:
You took a big jump I think if I had a gnex I wouldve stayed It has pretty good developing and much more but welcome back
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The GNex is really not a "better" phone...and since I probably won't even root this thing, I'm not that concerned about development.
I Nexus is a great device, it's not quite as fast as the Epic Touch, but it gets the job done. The thing I disliked about the Nexus is the screen time didn't come anywhere near the Epic Touch and I'm a heavy user. So for medium-light users, the gNex would be perfect. I swear it's got to be the penTile screen on the Nexus that's hinders the screen time as far as battery life goes. I hear the SGSIII has penTile too, but it's a new ugpraded version of it?
I heard that Franco kernels for the Nexus had amazing battery life...I don't get eight to ten hours battery life on my Epic Touch on CM9 alpha 5 due to no kernel source...my phone lasts forever on Caulkins el29 based rom ...all in the kernel, brah.
Sent from my GT-P7510 using xda premium
Thats why I laughed at all the people jumping ship to the GNex. Ya its pure android but that is where it the comparison stops
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
I'm using cm9 with Franco kernel, battery life doesn't even get discussed in the forums.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
My battery life sucks but I'm on an older one and too lazy to upgrade :/
I use my phone a lot as well
Ryjabo said:
I just came back to the Epic 4G Touch after having a Galaxy Nexus for a bit (bought one at launch and I'm selling it now) and damn it feels good to have this phone again.
I really wanted to love the GNex... especially the software buttons... but the battery life was complete sh** (I was lucky to get 8-10 hours) and certain things just weren't as smooth. Not to mention not being able to use my favorite live wallpapers because while everything runs like butter on the E4GT, it'd cause a very noticeable stutter/lag in the UI on the GNex. Oh, and the camera on the GNex is also crap in comparison.
Anyhoo... those of you that are running the leaked 4.0.x ROMs, how's the battery life?
I'm just fine using ADW EX until the 4.0 update hits... at which point I'll immediately install Apex Pro again... but I hope they don't wait until after the Galaxy S3 hits to push out the OTA to our phones.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you sold the phone? PM me I'm interested.
In comparing the two epic is lot smoother! In scrolling transitions etc.. via cm9 .. You will enjoy cm9 alot more on the epic cause of the smoothness compared to the nexus. but i still love my nexus!
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
mookiejr05 said:
I'm using cm9 with Franco kernel, battery life doesn't even get discussed in the forums.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What kernel settings are you using? Processor speed? Governor? And what version? And what color/gamma/ brightness settings?
GNex using Euroskank CM9 w/ Trinity kernel. I love this phone! Everything can be customized. Here are a few kernel settings as well...
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Xparent ICS Tapatalk 2
Im just curious to which roms are performing the best so I decided to start this thread. If you can post a screenshot of your benchmark score along with what rom you are running on your galaxy note 2 id just love to see how they compare. Im running jellybomb 10.0.1 with overclock to 1800 just wanna see if theres some tweaks I need to do or if my notes performing like it should lol thanks to the devs for all their hard work.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda app-developers app
I am on the stock rom no overclock.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda premium
Your results lead me to believe something is not quite right on my phone lol my results dont look much higher than yours and I think they should be with the overclock and everything, maybe its because I have my phone full of music and big games like gta 3 and max payne that take up a lot of space... kinda new to the whole custom rom thing lol so im not sure
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda app-developers app
Here's my scores . Got 7000
jelly bombed gnote 2
I'm just curious.. What's is it with benchmark scores? If your phone is running smooth without any lag and snappy shouldn't be any issues?
-TeaM VeNuM Like A Boss
-Galaxy Note II Edition
MiguelHogue said:
I'm just curious.. What's us it with benchmark scores? If your phone is running smooth without any lag and snappy shouldn't be any issues?
-TeaM VeNuM Like A Boss
-Galaxy Note II Edition
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My phone is fast and snappy, I was just curious about the benchmarks because it gives numbers to compare the phones by. Im very happy with the way mine works but if someone else's is working a lil better and I can see that on a bar graph like with the benchmark it lets me see which roms run better but I love jellybomb so I probably won't switch anyway lol I guess the short answer is just to satisfy my curiosity and just for comparisons sake
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda app-developers app
Omg_Its_Erie said:
My phone is fast and snappy, I was just curious about the benchmarks because it gives numbers to compare the phones by. Im very happy with the way mine works but if someone else's is working a lil better and I can see that on a bar graph like with the benchmark it lets me see which roms run better but I love jellybomb so I probably won't switch anyway lol I guess the short answer is just to satisfy my curiosity and just for comparisons sake
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Gotcha.. That's understandable.. I was hoping my question didn't see rude lol.. The was the last way I'd hope someone to take it... But I assume better benchmark scores will come about when the kernel for our phones can go past 1.8..which there's a issues with that due to the voltage past 1.8..It's more to it but I haven't followed the issue since 1.8 is good enough for me lol
-TeaM VeNuM Like A Boss
-Galaxy Note II Edition
No I didnt think you were rude at all lol just glad to see people are actually reading my posts
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda app-developers app
Note II Jellybombed
Admit what you can't deny and deny what you can't admit
Jellybomb 2, I've tried 4 different roms and they DHL have been pretty fast. I lik jellybomb the best.
Sent from my Super GN2 Untouchable
heres my scores
I know benchmarks don't mean much but here is my quadrant scores running Team VeNuM - STOCK L900VPALJC - DEODEXED. With Kernel Nov 17 Perseus oc to 1.8 with governor set to performance.
Just want to thank all the devs who helped make our note 2 even better.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Xparent Purple Tapatalk 2
Multi Benchmarks
N7100 running AssasinROM V6.0, SaberKernel 25.0, CPU at 1.92GHz, GPU at 800MHz. Running just a bit warmer than usual while benchmarking.
I got this with the Perseus Kernel running on Whompasaurus Rom. I have my CPU overclocked to 1.8 GHz and my GPU to 720 MHz. Runs great, and since the CPU isn't always running full speed, the battery life is great.
This is what I'm getting on stock rooted MC2 with Saber.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda app-developers app
t4d73 said:
This is what I'm getting on stock rooted MC2 with Saber.
View attachment 2041472View attachment 2041473
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Way frequencies are you running at (CPU and GPU) with the Saber kernel and how do they affect the battery life?
CorruptionDee said:
Way frequencies are you running at (CPU and GPU) with the Saber kernel and how do they affect the battery life?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well I've been rooted and overclocked since the day I got this device. Using perseus back then so I don't know how good battery life can really get. With Saber I'm overclocked to 1.92ghz but I am also hotpluging with Pegasusq so that I have all 4 cores running simultaneously together at max cpu. Gpu is maxed out too. I bought 3 extra batteries and a wall charger on amazon so juice is never an issue.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda app-developers app
Notice how low the percentage is at idle.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda app-developers app
t4d73 said:
Notice how low the percentage is at idle.
View attachment 2044597
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh ok. That makes far more sense as to why your quadrant is so high. I'm running Perseus Kernel at 1.8Ghz, but it doesn't always run full throttle.
CorruptionDee said:
Oh ok. That makes far more sense as to why your quadrant is so high. I'm running Perseus Kernel at 1.8Ghz, but it doesn't always run full throttle.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah if you really wanted it to hotpluging is the way to go and Pegasusq is the best governor for that. Has the most options of them all. I love Perseus kernel and it really is great but I love the extra speed with Saber. It flys! And that's putting it lightly lol!
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda app-developers app
Running MacksRom Plain Jane, with SaberKernal.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda premium
http://phandroid.com/2013/04/02/futuremark-3dmark-benchmark-android/
Just downloaded it. Pretty big file but not bigger than my disappointment at seeing the Note II's score. Yeah I know benchmarks dont mean crap but I figured it would score a lot higher that what it did.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2
3328 here. No idea if that's good or not. What did you get?
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2
Here's what I got.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda app-developers app
luisrodg said:
3328 here. No idea if that's good or not. What did you get?
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Higher the better.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda app-developers app
300 megabytes has to be some kind of non game app record.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2
Our device scores fairly low compared to the nexus 4. Like half.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda premium
nubsors said:
Our device scores fairly low compared to the nexus 4. Like half.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Barely. The Nexus 4 is neck and neck with the brand new HTC One.
No point in downloading if you haven't yet.
I don't think these are accurate. My scores are in the high 2000. It don't even show up on the scale lol.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda app-developers app
budde2 said:
I don't think these are accurate. My scores are in the high 2000. It don't even show up on the scale lol.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well the more tweaks and overclocking and the more and more crap I have running on my phone lol is why I was way over 4000. It says what's your secret... I wouldn't even know where to begin. Start with Perseus kernel though. But seriously would even getting 6 or 7000 Really be a good thing anyway? I mean running every tweak and tweak app and overclock isn't really healthy for your device overall imo. Don't get me wrong I love how fast this thing is but lots of times you end up screwing something up and have to start from scratch.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda app-developers app
Just what we needed, another "benchmark" to make us feel inadequate about our phones.
PS, I hate futuremark. They are BS for a benchmark, but great for stress-testing/burn-in a new video card.
Sent from my calculator watch.
Regular test: 4606
Extreme: 3160
Running Synergy r50 release
with Perseus and all CPU and GPU maxed out with performance governor.
I know the numbers mean nothing but it's always fun.
Not that it means much, but for fun, here are my numbers:
Regular: 3415
Extreme: 2545
Whomp's latest and No-frills CPU set at performance.
I'd rather have the 15+ hours of battery life than fighting space ships moving a bit faster.
Never understood the benchmark apps. They mean very little in today's devices.
Sent from my little Note2
I don't understand why so many people base a device off a benchmark. Real World is totally different
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda app-developers app
I disagree that benchmarks mean nothing. They measure speed and performance which is what I want out of my device. To each his own but they mean everything to me. Some worry more about battery life which is fine but obviously not performance because it would adversely affect your battery.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda app-developers app
t4d73 said:
I disagree that benchmarks mean nothing. They measure speed and performance which is what I want out of my device. To each his own but they mean everything to me. Some worry more about battery life which is fine but obviously not performance because it would adversely affect your battery.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What a benchmark does is measure how well your particular device does in that particular benchmark... It tells you nothing about real world life of opening or closing apps or about interface lag. Battery life is something real, a bench like this tells you nothing apart from how well your device does on it.
Benches are fundamentally about epeen.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2
Skripka said:
What a benchmark does is measure how well your particular device does in that particular benchmark... It tells you nothing about real world life of opening or closing apps or about interface lag. Battery life is something real, a bench like this tells you nothing apart from how well your device does on it.
Benches are fundamentally about epeen.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess what I'm saying is I don't care about battery life because I bought 3 extra batteries and a wall charger so it's not an issue for me and performance is what I want. Yeah maybe benches don't say much but I'm into speed so I like to just have something to compare it too.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda app-developers app
We have the biggest phone, why not want the biggest e-peen?
t4d73 said:
I guess what I'm saying is I don't care about battery life because I bought 3 extra batteries and a wall charger so it's not an issue for me and performance is what I want. Yeah maybe benches don't say much but I'm into speed so I like to just have something to compare it too.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes but why is stock nexus 4 so much faster than stock note 2?
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda premium