Develop Bugs

[Kernel][ICS][1.4ghz]DragonMOD+ (1/17/2012)

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
This is a kernel I make for myself and myself alone, I'm posting in case some of you might want to use it =]​​
I will only add features I like, thanks for telling me but theres no guarantee I'll add it​
If you guys dont like the bootanimation feel free to make me one =]​
If you like please donate as im a poor MF =P​
Feature List :​-------------------
Voodoo Color
Voodoo Sound
OC to 1.4ghz
[email protected] 1ghz and lower
[email protected] & 1.4ghz
ThumbEE
BLN
Tiny Preempt RCU
Simple, Deadline, and Noop I/O (Simple default) (These are best for solid state media)
Lazy,Smartassv2,Scary, and Performance Govs (Scary default) (PS. lazy seems to cause screen flicker)
Gov settings set to keep to lower freqs as much as possible
BFS
SLUB (SLUB is best IMO for small systems next to SLOB)
BLX
read ahead 1024
BLD
Deep Idle
Optimized compile flags
FPS Cap enable (reduce chance of screen flicker)
Custom bootanimation made by me (its simple)
-------------------​
DOWNLOAD
-------------------​http://dl.dropbox.com/u/25791676/DMZ_ICS2.zip
kernel source will be updated and posted within the next week​

Sounds fly can't wait to flash it
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium

RSVP...
Thank you and downloading now... I'll report back...
Edit: So as I get a link lol
Sent from my SPH-D720 using xda app premium

do we really need another kernel. There is just too much development here and I don't have the time to keep up. This is crazy.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using XDA App. Developer of brickROM, and OP of XDA Thread of The Year 2011.

Shark_On_Land said:
do we really need another kernel. There is just too much development here and I don't have the time to keep up. This is crazy.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using XDA App. Developer of brickROM, and OP of XDA Thread of The Year 2011.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No we really dont.....but i also am not gonna be as active as others and I'm a bit more conservative on features. You guys want the latest greatest stuff use Glados or Matr1x =3 This is my personal kernel i decided to share

Is this going to be bfs-only? Would you say your usage is more gaming or multitasking biased?
I'm looking for battery life first, quickness second.

Braneless said:
Is this going to be bfs-only? Would you say your usage is more gaming or multitasking biased?
I'm looking for battery life first, quickness second.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Battery and gaming are my concerns, I consistently get 15+ hours of use and overall performance is good for gaming. Not really a multitasking person on my phone. And it will b bfs only
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using Tapatalk

Shark_On_Land said:
do we really need another kernel. There is just too much development here and I don't have the time to keep up. This is crazy.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using XDA App. Developer of brickROM, and OP of XDA Thread of The Year 2011.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ummm the more developers the better. If you can't keep up and just want to complain on everyone's threads why not revert your phone to stock and stop trolling? I'm grateful for all the development and the time the devs put into their products, whether I use them or not.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using Tapatalk

vertigosrs said:
Ummm the more developers the better. If you can't keep up and just want to complain on everyone's threads why not revert your phone to stock and stop trolling? I'm grateful for all the development and the time the devs put into their products, whether I use them or not.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no need for defense, i dont think he meant anything by it
everyone please keep thread clean as possible

Sweet can't wait to check it out.. thanks eco. Anyone tried it yet? I'm on aokp v17
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using XDA App

I've not had much luck with bfs in the past, but ill give it a try.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using Tapatalk

Just flashed.
Will report in a bit.
To the OP, do yo mind telling me what governor and Max freq you keep ur nexus at? I definitely want the same results in battery that you're getting
To anyone flashing don't be afraid if you don't see a boot animation apparently there isn't one at all so
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using XDA App

genaro12543 said:
Just flashed.
Will report in a bit.
To the OP, do yo mind telling me what governor and Max freq you keep ur nexus at? I definitely want the same results in battery that you're getting
To anyone flashing don't be afraid if you don't see a boot animation apparently there isn't one at all so
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The compression on the boot animation got Fd up. Also my settings are everything enabled. 100-1400mhz, scary gov. Will fix boot animation tonight
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using Tapatalk

Well Shark has been trolling around being obnoxious lately. So I understand the hostility.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium

Has anybody gotten the green flash or flash when turning off or on the screen? It's kinda been the main thing that's been keeping me away from ICS. That and lag.

koolkid09 said:
Has anybody gotten the green flash or flash when turning off or on the screen? It's kinda been the main thing that's been keeping me away from ICS. That and lag.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The green flash has nothing to do with ICS, it has to do with the kernel and whether or not the kernel is using voodoo mods.

Nice job!

You are gonna release this for the Nexus S? (Not 4G).
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App

mathkid95 said:
Nice job!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If this guy likes its good stuff here thanks devs
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium

Icecoldmeat said:
You are gonna release this for the Nexus S? (Not 4G).
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It should work for all nexus variants......
Sent from my AOKP Nexus S 4G

Best battery

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
So, I'm thinking, I want better battery life and i don want my stuff to be slow. I accomplished half of. that no pprob. I'm gpintotest battery life tomorrow. But here's the settings and the funniest benchmark EVEREVER
Sent from my A100 using xda premium

Nice lol
For battery life I run 816/216, conservative, -125mv on all. Gives smoothness with extra battery life. IMO.

Romman0 said:
Nice lol
For battery life I run 816/216, conservative, -125mv on all. Gives smoothness with extra battery life. IMO.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For battery life I run my nexus 7.
OK besides that I ran no UV Lionheart and 816/216 auto brightness array that's tuned a little dim for my own build. WiFi timeout 15 minutes. I get an average from gsam of a little over 8 hours though that's optimistic.

I want a new tab for battery, nexus 7 actually OK?
Sent from my A100 using xda premium

das_webos_transformer said:
I want a new tab for battery, nexus 7 actually OK?
Sent from my A100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It beats the hell out of the a100 for sure. Kicked the a100 out the door, it wasn't good for much besides a door stop after the nexus 7 and the 10" thrive.

You gotta give the a100 props though. It was one of the first 7in tabs not to suck! Evolution took it a step further and the base design of this tab has reoccurred in a few places, RAZR Max, notice the corners, some other grabs have the camera there. This tab was, is and will continue to be awesome. Besides the crap battery and the random bricking which has essentially stopped, as far as I know.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda app-developers app

das_webos_transformer said:
You gotta give the a100 props though. It was one of the first 7in tabs not to suck! Evolution took it a step further and the base design of this tab has reoccurred in a few places, RAZR Max, notice the corners, some other grabs have the camera there. This tab was, is and will continue to be awesome. Besides the crap battery and the random bricking which has essentially stopped, as far as I know.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes its a decent tab that is still quite usable, but having a nexus 7 makes it useless in thus household now and has been moved to a new home. It had its good and bad points but for me for every flaw the a100 has and even those that devs had to correct because Acer wouldn't, means I will never buy an Acer product again. Google devices for me now as I don't wish to continue being forced to create new ROMs for a device because the manufacturer decided to ditch it.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Hahaha..... so, sooo many devices have been like that.
Sent from my A100 using xda premium

My best battery...ever...I've never had these kind of stats till I played with lulzactive and killed wireless before sleep. 816/216
Performance wasn't too bad actually, but here is the benchmark.
And this is my performance tuned lulzactive...4-6 hours battery. lol

Yuck!
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda app-developers app

das_webos_transformer said:
Yuck!
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What? Lol for my uses this is pretty good.
Sent via G2x on temasek b135.2 w/faux kernel v54

justjackyl said:
What? Lol for my uses this is pretty good.
Sent via G2x on temasek b135.2 w/faux kernel v54
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Considering how fast the a100 got in jb those scores are still a very usable tablet. Maybe not the fastest out there, but faster then ICS was.
Tapatalked from my Nexus 7 - Kuroikaze AOSP

pio_masaki said:
Considering how fast the a100 got in jb those scores are still a very usable tablet. Maybe not the fastest out there, but faster then ICS was.
Tapatalked from my Nexus 7 - Kuroikaze AOSP
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I believe its possible to go faster. But im trying to find that happy medium of what works with battery and useable performance for my needs.
Do i know i can go faster, ya, but my point is to not kill half the battery with one benchmark, lol
I wish i had a stock score for comparison,i supposed if i looked..lol
Sent via G2x on temasek b135.2 w/faux kernel v54

I know it goes faster, mine did its just not usable in that level of tuning plus its a huge strain on the hardware to push that far, 1.7 GHz is a 70% push in speed and voltage increases are getting scary at that point. Benchmark increases become smaller in relation to speed increases as well, meaning we're exceeding its safety range. Same for GPU oc, pushing it much father doesn't yield much more for benchmarks either but adds more strain then is really needed. What good is a tablet running over 5k in quadrant if it can't run on battery more then a couple hours?
Tapatalked from my Nexus 7 - Kuroikaze AOSP

Sick nasty benchmarks. I did a benchmark on my old phone, not a quadrant but a geekbench. It scored a 10... in comparison, my a100 scored 1200... the dual core along with the fact its a tegra and coupled with the gig of ram make for all around good experiences on job. Imo
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda app-developers app

[APP] CoreDisabler v.1.0 (DISABLE CPU CORES FOR SAVING BATTERY!)

Hi, I have just found this application for our Nexus 4!!!
This app let us disable the CPU cores we want, so we can save a lot of battery... Also it gives an option to disable the at boot..
I have tried it... Although it costs €1, its worth to buy it, works well
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.iamaner.CoreDisabler

Do you have any data to support the claim that it improves battery life?
I've always thought that spreading the workload over more cores is more efficient eg. 4 cores working at say 700 is better then 2 cores running at 1400.

parker09 said:
Do you have any data to support the claim that it improves battery life?
I've always thought that spreading the workload over more cores is more efficient eg. 4 cores working at say 700 is better then 2 cores running at 1400.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In my personal experience, i have noticed a little increase of battery duration... However, although i have underclocked to 1024MHz, i didnt noticed any performance decrease..
I suppose that my device works like monocore device

Not sure why someone buys a powerful quad core phone and then disabled cores and also under clocks it. I mean if battery life is your main concern than why not get a slower phone that has longer battery life?
What is purpose of having the power of you are just going to remove it?
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app

Richieboy67 said:
Not sure why someone buys a powerful quad core phone and then disabled cores and also under clocks it. I mean if battery life is your main concern than why not get a slower phone that has longer battery life?
What is purpose of having the power of you are just going to remove it?
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We want the power there when we need it, but want to be able to save battery when we need that. That's what Android is all about, freedom and control over your phone! =)

I don't believe this will really save battery. One core running higher loads should take longer and increase the screen on time, CPU temp due to higher core usage etc.
I think you will end up with a slower phone with similar or worse battery life.
Do some tests
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app

This app has the potential to be interesting but the S4 Pro is already effiecient enough, in fact it turns off cores itself when it needs to.
The Optimus G has the ability to manually turn off cores but that feature is unavailable in the Nexus 4, stock Android

Richieboy67 said:
Not sure why someone buys a powerful quad core phone and then disabled cores and also under clocks it. I mean if battery life is your main concern than why not get a slower phone that has longer battery life?
What is purpose of having the power of you are just going to remove it?
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The thing is that, although this phone is underclocked and has its cores disabled, it still works great

There's an App called Trickster Mod which shows you, that Kernels are disabled by default when not needed. In Standby it shows that on my Nexus 4 only one Kernel is working with 384 MHz. I think the Core Disabler App is useless....

What a useless app. Kernels such as Franco has hotplugging in the kernel already which disables and enables your core based on the amount of cpu usage.
If you're looking to maximize battery life, this app isn't the solution. And definitely not worth the 1 euro. Advertising a app on xda is illegal too
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium

zephiK said:
What a useless app. Kernels such as Franco has hotplugging in the kernel already which disables and enables your core based on the amount of cpu usage.
If you're looking to maximize battery life, this app isn't the solution. And definitely not worth the 1 euro. Advertising a app on xda is illegal too
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Illegal?
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium

Hey i am not advertising any app, you know??? This app is not mine, i only wanted to share this useful application..
There are also other paid apps advertised in this forum and nobody says anything!!!

Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app

thanks op but i'll just stick with setCPU and underclocki with battery saying profiles

I always wanted a tri-core.

why did u bother to buy a superfast phone that you cant handle its speed and battery life?

Not working with bricked kernel 0.7! I wanted a tricore, too!
Gesendet von meinem Nexus 4 mit Tapatalk 2

Let's face it, the battery needed to have far more capacity than it does. However, this is made by LG... not surprised...
I am already waiting for next year Nexus phone...
Skickat från min Nexus 7

Q.Entity said:
Let's face it, the battery needed to have far more capacity than it does. However, this is made by LG... not surprised...
I am already waiting for next year Nexus phone...
Skickat från min Nexus 7
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is 2100 mAh which should be good enough. It is the software and the wake locks, and project butters unneeded speed when touching the screen that causes the battery to be lower.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium

zabihjan said:
why did u bother to buy a superfast phone that you cant handle its speed and battery life?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Probably because you don't always need every core. 2 cores will provide the same experience even if you underclock. Having two active cores should give similar or better performance than the S4(dual), so it makes sense to disable the others. I will trust android with quads when core management improves, which should arrive with Key lime pie hopefully.
wooki said:
Not working with bricked kernel 0.7! I wanted a tricore, too!
Gesendet von meinem Nexus 4 mit Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It would be cool if we could program the other cores for specific tasks. So the main two will handle the main task, the third can handle background task, and the fourth can do media things. Though I doubt we'll ever see the cores implemented like that.

3dMark for Android is released.

http://phandroid.com/2013/04/02/futuremark-3dmark-benchmark-android/
Just downloaded it. Pretty big file but not bigger than my disappointment at seeing the Note II's score. Yeah I know benchmarks dont mean crap but I figured it would score a lot higher that what it did.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

3328 here. No idea if that's good or not. What did you get?
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

Here's what I got.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda app-developers app

luisrodg said:
3328 here. No idea if that's good or not. What did you get?
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Higher the better.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda app-developers app

300 megabytes has to be some kind of non game app record.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

Our device scores fairly low compared to the nexus 4. Like half.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda premium

nubsors said:
Our device scores fairly low compared to the nexus 4. Like half.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Barely. The Nexus 4 is neck and neck with the brand new HTC One.

No point in downloading if you haven't yet.

I don't think these are accurate. My scores are in the high 2000. It don't even show up on the scale lol.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda app-developers app

budde2 said:
I don't think these are accurate. My scores are in the high 2000. It don't even show up on the scale lol.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well the more tweaks and overclocking and the more and more crap I have running on my phone lol is why I was way over 4000. It says what's your secret... I wouldn't even know where to begin. Start with Perseus kernel though. But seriously would even getting 6 or 7000 Really be a good thing anyway? I mean running every tweak and tweak app and overclock isn't really healthy for your device overall imo. Don't get me wrong I love how fast this thing is but lots of times you end up screwing something up and have to start from scratch.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda app-developers app

Just what we needed, another "benchmark" to make us feel inadequate about our phones.
PS, I hate futuremark. They are BS for a benchmark, but great for stress-testing/burn-in a new video card.
Sent from my calculator watch.

Regular test: 4606
Extreme: 3160
Running Synergy r50 release
with Perseus and all CPU and GPU maxed out with performance governor.
I know the numbers mean nothing but it's always fun.

Not that it means much, but for fun, here are my numbers:
Regular: 3415
Extreme: 2545
Whomp's latest and No-frills CPU set at performance.
I'd rather have the 15+ hours of battery life than fighting space ships moving a bit faster.

Never understood the benchmark apps. They mean very little in today's devices.
Sent from my little Note2

I don't understand why so many people base a device off a benchmark. Real World is totally different
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda app-developers app

I disagree that benchmarks mean nothing. They measure speed and performance which is what I want out of my device. To each his own but they mean everything to me. Some worry more about battery life which is fine but obviously not performance because it would adversely affect your battery.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda app-developers app

t4d73 said:
I disagree that benchmarks mean nothing. They measure speed and performance which is what I want out of my device. To each his own but they mean everything to me. Some worry more about battery life which is fine but obviously not performance because it would adversely affect your battery.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What a benchmark does is measure how well your particular device does in that particular benchmark... It tells you nothing about real world life of opening or closing apps or about interface lag. Battery life is something real, a bench like this tells you nothing apart from how well your device does on it.
Benches are fundamentally about epeen.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

Skripka said:
What a benchmark does is measure how well your particular device does in that particular benchmark... It tells you nothing about real world life of opening or closing apps or about interface lag. Battery life is something real, a bench like this tells you nothing apart from how well your device does on it.
Benches are fundamentally about epeen.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess what I'm saying is I don't care about battery life because I bought 3 extra batteries and a wall charger so it's not an issue for me and performance is what I want. Yeah maybe benches don't say much but I'm into speed so I like to just have something to compare it too.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda app-developers app

We have the biggest phone, why not want the biggest e-peen?

t4d73 said:
I guess what I'm saying is I don't care about battery life because I bought 3 extra batteries and a wall charger so it's not an issue for me and performance is what I want. Yeah maybe benches don't say much but I'm into speed so I like to just have something to compare it too.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes but why is stock nexus 4 so much faster than stock note 2?
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda premium

How good is your cpu? Find out here! Find your bin.

using root explorer or alike go to d/acpuclk/pvs_bin. Use text reader to open it and you should see a number. The higher the number the better quality your chip is suppose to be. I think highest is 0 or 6. 0-6
Tweaked Alpha powered by Lean Kernel
All credit sshafranko
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk

Mine was a zero! But like the man said it's either zero or 6 that's the highest. I run my cpu at 3.0 ghz. So... maybe 0 is good?
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk

mine was a 3...
i love being average :\

Ok found out the skinny.
0 requires the least power but is sensitive to overclock.
6 is resilient to overclock and consumes more power because of leakage.
You can read the articles by go ogling *snapdragon cpu bin*
So I guess my chip is a power saver. But I'm able to oc like crazy...so I don't know how significant this really is. My note 3 has been running at 2.8 ghz for DAYS without a problem.
So basically binning has to do with the chips leaking power with 6 being the #leakiest#
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk

janjannsen99 said:
Ok found out the skinny.
0 requires the least power but is sensitive to overclock.
6 is resilient to overclock and consumes more power because of leakage.
You can read the articles by go ogling *snapdragon cpu bin*
So I guess my chip is a power saver. But I'm able to oc like crazy...so I don't know how significant this really is. My note 3 has been running at 2.8 ghz for DAYS without a problem.
So basically binning has to do with the chips leaking power with 6 being the #leakiest#
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you tried benchmarking clocked to 2.8 and 3.0? I bet it reboots if you try it. I have a 3.

No reboots buddy
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
That's 2.8
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk

janjannsen99 said:
No reboots buddy
That's 2.8
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's a pretty low score for being clocked to 2.8, mine scores that clocked to 2.419 on saber. That's good it doesn't reboot anyways.

I don't really care about scores I have 400 apps man lol I think that might have a small impact on my score haha. Yes it does work no problem on 2.8 with a zero bin cpu. I use imoseyon kernel for daily driver. I've also been able to boot the 3 gigahertz kernel too for about 5 minutes before it crashes out.
But what the articles from qualcomm were saying that binning has more to do with power leakage than anything else, e.g. excessive heat, battery drain, etc. So the lower the number the more "efficient" the chip is but less stable and the higher less stable less efficient and more stable for overclock. Think like a boat. One has holes in it with 2 300hp Honda engines the other boat has few holes and 2 300hp off brand less powerful bootleg engines.
They still go just about as fast but one is a little slower. However on the other boat you're scooping water sometimes lol.
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk

I'm a 3 also
Sent from my SM-N900T using xda premium

janjannsen99 said:
using root explorer or alike go to d/acpuclk/pvs_bin. Use text reader to open it and you should see a number. The higher the number the better quality your chip is suppose to be. I think highest is 0 or 6. 0-6
Tweaked Alpha powered by Lean Kernel
All credit sshafranko
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm showing a 4. I wonder how much a difference this actually has in the phones, it seems pretty minimal to none.

1 here
Sent from my SM-N900T using xda app-developers app

Bin of 2 here. I'm all about the power saving though lol. I run 2.5ghz every now and then which is pretty stable haven't benchmarked with it though.
Sent from my SM-N900T

Also have 2 here.
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk 4

..

Wow 400 apps, I bet you use 375 of those apps once a year maybe....lol :good:

Quickvic30 said:
Wow 400 apps, I bet you use 375 of those apps once a year maybe....lol :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea I know. I gotta get rid of some man its crazy
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk

The binning seems pretty random. I wonder if it's even important at all. ..
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk

I am bin 2 and running 2.96 ghz
Sent from my SM-N900T

Ima a bin 3 and can over clock to 3ghz and underclock 75 on mpu so im good where i am
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk

2, running stock speeds and voltages (whatever compulsion standard kernel sets it at).