Develop Bugs

So I was using antutu bench and I saw this...

Who is this?!?
What's wrong but so right with this pic?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

ICS, interesting. Let's see how the rumor mill explains this.

Maybe it was from one of those Rev ROMS...
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

The clock speed is also 1.9ghz

Ics and almost 2ghz clocks is crazy
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

Somebody's not sharing ICS with us

Went and checked it out to make sure it wasn't some photoshop voodoo and it is there
The question is how easy is it to fake submitted data? If you can't then I'd call it a great sign for the near future but closed in a shroud of unanswered questions.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

Could just be an edited build prop.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

Killbynature said:
Could just be an edited build prop.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fair enough
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

avarize said:
Went and checked it out to make sure it wasn't some photoshop voodoo and it is there
The question is how easy is it to fake submitted data? If you can't then I'd call it a great sign for the near future but closed in a shroud of unanswered questions.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LoL. I knew somebody would think Photoshop made an appearance. I was seeing the effects of the updated v6 supercharger script and there it was.

ntellegence said:
LoL. I knew somebody would think Photoshop made an appearance. I was seeing the effects of the updated v6 supercharger script and there it was.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wasn't accusing but these days it has to be ruled out
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

It's a building prop edit I just edited mines to see if it would show up.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

jasontx said:
Maybe it was from one of those Rev ROMS...
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this, Never a fan of that since it led some people to believe ICS was available in our phone.
Someone should modify the build prop to 4.5 and benchmark their phone and time
how long for it to reach the rumor mill.

Killbynature said:
It's a building prop edit I just edited mines to see if it would show up.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it had to be a build prop edit because for ics to be oc at 1.9 and getting that kind of pathetic score would be 1 hell of a disappointment.. when i get over 7300 oc at 1.72 with faux..

foreverloco said:
it had to be a build prop edit because for ics to be oc at 1.9 and getting that kind of pathetic score would be 1 hell of a disappointment.. when i get over 7300 oc at 1.72 with faux..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A lower score with ics would actually make sense. Assuming its is really ics. ICS is much more a system hog itself than previous os. The only reason the transformer prime scores high is because it's a pentacore device so the test stresses all the cores.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

probably the CM9 team trying out stuff?

AllGamer said:
probably the CM9 team trying out stuff?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm, I don't think anyone ever though of that.
Killbynature said:
A lower score with ics would actually make sense. Assuming its is really ics. ICS is much more a system hog itself than previous os. The only reason the transformer prime scores high is because it's a pentacore device so the test stresses all the cores.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Very true, the Exynos is able to keep even with benchmarks, only because it's just a much better CPU, thanks to the Cortex A9 tech. The S3, which snappy, will lose some performance on ICS, most likely not noticeable, but you will lose it on benchmarks.

Remember Rev and his ics build and how much crap people gave him because his build prop was 4.0.3? It's gotta be that.
Message relayed from the dark side.

Longcat14 said:
Hmm, I don't think anyone ever though of that.
Very true, the Exynos is able to keep even with benchmarks, only because it's just a much better CPU, thanks to the Cortex A9 tech. The S3, which snappy, will lose some performance on ICS, most likely not noticeable, but you will lose it on benchmarks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wrong
ics brings performance improvements, the reason why gnexus scored badly is because its running 720p on a sgx540..

AznDud333 said:
wrong
ics brings performance improvements, the reason why gnexus scored badly is because its running 720p on a sgx540..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ICS is also more of a system hog, which will drop the benchmarks, but will increase real world performance dramatically.

Highest E4GT quadrant scores?

In just curious what kind of quadrant scores people have been getting with which setups? in running Blazer ROM with Hitman kernel. with setcpu I just hit a score of 6171.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA App

cknuth said:
In just curious what kind of quadrant scores people have been getting with which setups? in running Blazer ROM with Hitman kernel. with setcpu I just hit a score of 6171.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pictures or it didn't happen...
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium

There's at least two other threads that show scores. I've seen quads in the 6k, but I forgot what the setups were. My personal highest was 4932.

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
sent from the near past

I can't get over 1.5GHz without freezing sadly. I get high 4000s
Sent from my Epic™ 4G Touch

. Adjust your voltages maybe
sent from the near past

holy balls those are some high scores..... really dont look into the "epeen benchmarks" since last year... because all it takes to get a higher score is multiple runs and tweaks to the fps/ext4 system
but alot of you hope showing your quadrants/linpacs would get you laid...... lol just playing (i had to)
but damn man those SMOKE the evo 3d on its BEST day/kernel.... and to think... many have said (even my self) that they have the same performance.... (i owned a E4GT since launch and sold it a few weeks later) cant wait to get my white one tomorrow!!!!

blendz rom gunslinger kernel @1.6 set at performance but just started running really buggy after

Didn't do quite as good on this one. its fun to just play around and try and improve your score.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA App

To the gentleman who some how broke 6500. How did you do it?
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium

nthornton1990 said:
To the gentleman who some how broke 6500. How did you do it?
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
With the setup I posted....cleared my ram....1.6 with on demand....setting to performance doesn't give me better preformance...and the low 6000 was on 1.5
sent from the near past

Danial723 said:
With the setup I posted....cleared my ram....1.6 with on demand....setting to performance doesn't give me better preformance...and the low 6000 was on 1.5
sent from the near past
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got the same set up and all I could muster was:
Using the lazy governor gives me higher scores than ondemand or performance.

I'm not too far behind and I have a single core hahaha 1.5ghz
Sent From My SPH-D700 Running Android 4.0 :sly:

I got like 4850 or something like that without any OC. Just Blazer and Gunslinger.

SuperSwagSauce said:
I got like 4850 or something like that without any OC. Just Blazer and Gunslinger.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seriously though take into account the dualcore at 1.2...... its obvious your scores will be higher besides the point quadrant numbers mean nothing to me.... I was just saying for an almost EOL phone 4504 isn't bad
Sent From My SPH-D700 Running Android 4.0 :sly:

Biggoron said:
Seriously though take into account the dualcore at 1.2...... its obvious your scores will be higher besides the point quadrant numbers mean nothing to me.... I was just saying for an almost EOL phone 4504 isn't bad
Sent From My SPH-D700 Running Android 4.0 :sly:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not at all. I wasn't really aiming that at you anyway lol. I thought the quadrant benchmark only tested one core?

SuperSwagSauce said:
Not at all. I wasn't really aiming that at you anyway lol. I thought the quadrant benchmark only tested one core?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Doubt it, your thinking of smartbench 2010 and 2011 which '10 is for single cores because it doesn't do multithreads whereas '11 does .
I would think quadrant would use as much as there is. I don't think it only uses one core
Sent From My SPH-D700 Running Android 4.0 :sly:

Blazer 3.8 odex hitman kernel
oc to 1504.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk

nthornton1990 said:
To the gentleman who some how broke 6500. How did you do it?
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A good ROM and oc to 1.7ghz
Sent from my Epic™ 4G Touch

globalninja said:
A good ROM and oc to 1.7ghz
Sent from my Epic™ 4G Touch
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Man, Im overclocked to 1.7, cleared ram, and still cant pull 6000.

Changing CPU settings for better battery life.

I am hearing a lot about cpu adjustment, over clocking and script stuff for some extended battery life. I searched a lot but couldnt find any nice guide on this. I am running Juggernaut 5.0 with darkside mainline karnel . I am getting 8 hours of battery life. Want some more; since i am heavy user
Please help me on that.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

try beast mod, its awesome for battery life.

I'm running Slickmod 2.4 with Gideon's UV script (no setcpu or anything involved) and I'm PRETTY sure I'm getting better battery life than I ever did on Juggs 5.0, maybe try that?

Undervolting/underclocking is what you need to maximize battery life. With that said, I get 20+ hours running Warfare rom/kernel.

Anthonomy said:
Undervolting/underclocking is what you need to maximize battery life. With that said, I get 20+ hours running Warfare rom/kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I love darkside rom but wanted to try alAxia theme on juggernaut so using that one now.
How we set up cpu?? please guide me .
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

I tried synergy kernel with juggs latest and the animations get pretty jittery along with constant homescreen roughness while scrolling. It's not slow, but not smooth. Was wondering what the best ROM/kernel combo is that's buttery smooth with the best battery life.
I'm using adw ex if that makes a difference? Tried with touchwiz and was the same.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

jtroye32 said:
I tried synergy kernel with juggs latest and the animations get pretty jittery along with constant homescreen roughness while scrolling. It's not slow, but not smooth. Was wondering what the best ROM/kernel combo is that's buttery smooth with the best battery life.
I'm using adw ex if that makes a difference? Tried with touchwiz and was the same.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Change karnel to darkside , its better than Faux that comes with Jaugg itself. I get like 8 hours heavy useage and its smooth too.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

bikrame said:
Change karnel to darkside , its better than Faux that comes with Jaugg itself. I get like 8 hours heavy useage and its smooth too.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk

This phone sleeps like a tired out baby!!!
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk

novanosis85 said:
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which karnel are you using ?
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

bikrame said:
Which karnel are you using ?
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dark side kernel the one that came with the rom.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk

novanosis85 said:
Dark side kernel the one that came with the rom.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which rom??
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

I think he means the darkside digital warfare 2.4 ROM and kernel. im also using that and was wondering how safe is overclocking on the 989D? (Telus model with 1.5 GHz it goes up to 1.8X)
Sent from my SGH-T989 using XDA

Can someone please tell me how yo set cpu max and min?? I tried but couldnt di it.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

Anthonomy said:
Undervolting/underclocking is what you need to maximize battery life. With that said, I get 20+ hours running Warfare rom/kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
juggz v5.0
gideons underclock script
v6 super charger
hercules 1.73 oc kernel
i get about 20 hours, i kill atleast 20-30% on youtube and pandora throughout my workday. Wifi for about 5 hours.

With darkside ROM and kernel with CPU set at 1.350 - 1.520 dont know if this is good
Sent from my SGH-T989 using XDA

SOMEONE PLEASE TELL ME HOW TO SET CPU !!!!
I KNOW WE CAN GET BETTER BY ADJUSTING CPU; BUT HOW WE DO THAT ??!!!
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

I use CPU master free and set at 1350-1512 with on demand profile. But I have Telus 1.5 GHz version not sure the difference. Im running darkside digital warfare and included kernel works pretty good
Sent from my SGH-T989 using XDA

I find what helps my battery the most is just finding apps that auto activate in background its surprising what does games and social media apps
Sent from my SGH-T989 using XDA

Two pages and noone has a something to go by I would like to see some conformed info on this as well. I just play with setcpu app. Also the volts how do I play with those? And what are the dangers of messing with the volds?

Low low Quadrant Scores, should I be worried?

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
After Jb update I got over 6000 now I only get over 3000 and I've noticed a lag pulling down the status bar since, I've already done a factory reset still same outcome, should I be worried? Power saving is off btw stock not rooted
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2

horr1blek1tten said:
After Jb update I got over 6000 now I only get over 3000 and I've noticed a lag pulling down the status bar since, I've already done a factory reset still same outcome, should I be worried? Power saving is off btw stock not rooted
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Make sure power save is not on
Sent from my Rooted Gameboy

osmosizzz said:
Make sure power save is not on
Sent from my Rooted Gameboy
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I put in my post power saving is not on read before you post.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2

I wouldn't worry. You're probably just testing your phone after using it a lot
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium

Android_Monsters said:
I wouldn't worry. You're probably just testing your phone after using it a lot
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
shouldn't make a huge difference of 3k, though...
looking at the scores, your 2D and 3D rendering scores are absolutely awful. yikes. your 2D score should be over 1k and your 3D score should be in the low/mid 2k range. quadrant is a subjective benchmarking app because it takes all of your scores and kind of creates an average, this is why it is not hugely reliable sometimes and also why scores are plummeted
looking at your other scores, however, they are extremely low as well. your mem score should be around 11k, while your CPU score should be around 10K, and IO should be a little faster than what you are showing as well.
i would say your system is being bogged down by another process while you are running the test.
quick question, what ROM are you running?
also, a way to tell if this is indeed a performance issue, and not just quadrant being quadrant... is to download a graphically intense game and play it.. if it skips and lags and jitters a whole lot (which i know was happening during your rendering tests based on the terrible 2D and 3D scores), then there is some issue there. if it runs fine, then simply put, don't worry about it.

cobraboy85 said:
shouldn't make a huge difference of 3k, though...
looking at the scores, your 2D and 3D rendering scores are absolutely awful. yikes. your 2D score should be over 1k and your 3D score should be in the low/mid 2k range. quadrant is a subjective benchmarking app because it takes all of your scores and kind of creates an average, this is why it is not hugely reliable sometimes and also why scores are plummeted
looking at your other scores, however, they are extremely low as well. your mem score should be around 11k, while your CPU score should be around 10K, and IO should be a little faster than what you are showing as well.
i would say your system is being bogged down by another process while you are running the test.
quick question, what ROM are you running?
also, a way to tell if this is indeed a performance issue, and not just quadrant being quadrant... is to download a graphically intense game and play it.. if it skips and lags and jitters a whole lot (which i know was happening during your rendering tests based on the terrible 2D and 3D scores), then there is some issue there. if it runs fine, then simply put, don't worry about it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm running stock no root. I actually tried playing a game yesterday and it would lag a little. But this started happening when I let me phone go idle for so long.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2

Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2

horr1blek1tten said:
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
usage seems pretty normal.
are you using any cpu controlling apps?
also, just real quick, what ROM and kernel combo are you on bud?

Have you tried to re flash the stock rom? Other then that it has to be hardware.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium

cobraboy85 said:
usage seems pretty normal.
are you using any cpu controlling apps?
also, just real quick, what ROM and kernel combo are you on bud?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Everything Stock. And no CPU controlling apps I just upgraded from ICS everything was working fine .
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2

vopezy said:
Have you tried to re flash the stock rom? Other then that it has to be hardware.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I factory reset twice right after it updated to jb. If this continues, do I have to Odin the factory image?
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2

horr1blek1tten said:
I factory reset twice right after it updated to jb. If this continues, do I have to Odin the factory image?
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is your phone hot when you test? If so thermal throttling may be in place.
But from what it seems it seems like some sort of throttling is in effect. I would recommend another ROM and if it's still horrible you have a bad chip and warranty may be your only option.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2

3dMark for Android is released.

http://phandroid.com/2013/04/02/futuremark-3dmark-benchmark-android/
Just downloaded it. Pretty big file but not bigger than my disappointment at seeing the Note II's score. Yeah I know benchmarks dont mean crap but I figured it would score a lot higher that what it did.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

3328 here. No idea if that's good or not. What did you get?
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

Here's what I got.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda app-developers app

luisrodg said:
3328 here. No idea if that's good or not. What did you get?
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Higher the better.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda app-developers app

300 megabytes has to be some kind of non game app record.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

Our device scores fairly low compared to the nexus 4. Like half.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda premium

nubsors said:
Our device scores fairly low compared to the nexus 4. Like half.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Barely. The Nexus 4 is neck and neck with the brand new HTC One.

No point in downloading if you haven't yet.

I don't think these are accurate. My scores are in the high 2000. It don't even show up on the scale lol.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda app-developers app

budde2 said:
I don't think these are accurate. My scores are in the high 2000. It don't even show up on the scale lol.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well the more tweaks and overclocking and the more and more crap I have running on my phone lol is why I was way over 4000. It says what's your secret... I wouldn't even know where to begin. Start with Perseus kernel though. But seriously would even getting 6 or 7000 Really be a good thing anyway? I mean running every tweak and tweak app and overclock isn't really healthy for your device overall imo. Don't get me wrong I love how fast this thing is but lots of times you end up screwing something up and have to start from scratch.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda app-developers app

Just what we needed, another "benchmark" to make us feel inadequate about our phones.
PS, I hate futuremark. They are BS for a benchmark, but great for stress-testing/burn-in a new video card.
Sent from my calculator watch.

Regular test: 4606
Extreme: 3160
Running Synergy r50 release
with Perseus and all CPU and GPU maxed out with performance governor.
I know the numbers mean nothing but it's always fun.

Not that it means much, but for fun, here are my numbers:
Regular: 3415
Extreme: 2545
Whomp's latest and No-frills CPU set at performance.
I'd rather have the 15+ hours of battery life than fighting space ships moving a bit faster.

Never understood the benchmark apps. They mean very little in today's devices.
Sent from my little Note2

I don't understand why so many people base a device off a benchmark. Real World is totally different
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda app-developers app

I disagree that benchmarks mean nothing. They measure speed and performance which is what I want out of my device. To each his own but they mean everything to me. Some worry more about battery life which is fine but obviously not performance because it would adversely affect your battery.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda app-developers app

t4d73 said:
I disagree that benchmarks mean nothing. They measure speed and performance which is what I want out of my device. To each his own but they mean everything to me. Some worry more about battery life which is fine but obviously not performance because it would adversely affect your battery.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What a benchmark does is measure how well your particular device does in that particular benchmark... It tells you nothing about real world life of opening or closing apps or about interface lag. Battery life is something real, a bench like this tells you nothing apart from how well your device does on it.
Benches are fundamentally about epeen.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

Skripka said:
What a benchmark does is measure how well your particular device does in that particular benchmark... It tells you nothing about real world life of opening or closing apps or about interface lag. Battery life is something real, a bench like this tells you nothing apart from how well your device does on it.
Benches are fundamentally about epeen.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess what I'm saying is I don't care about battery life because I bought 3 extra batteries and a wall charger so it's not an issue for me and performance is what I want. Yeah maybe benches don't say much but I'm into speed so I like to just have something to compare it too.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda app-developers app

We have the biggest phone, why not want the biggest e-peen?

t4d73 said:
I guess what I'm saying is I don't care about battery life because I bought 3 extra batteries and a wall charger so it's not an issue for me and performance is what I want. Yeah maybe benches don't say much but I'm into speed so I like to just have something to compare it too.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes but why is stock nexus 4 so much faster than stock note 2?
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda premium