Ace 2 (I8160) Will skipping ICS for JB - Samsung Galaxy W I8150

http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_gal...786.php?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
wat da fak sammy?
that phone have similar hardware configuration like our phone, just 800Mhz dual core cpu and 768Mb ram, I guess its about 500Mb because 268Mb
deserved for system, and mali-400MP GPU. Just a slight improvisation from our i8150.
damn you sammy

wat da fak sammy?
that phone have similar hardware configuration like our phone, just 800Mhz dual core cpu and 768Mb ram, I guess its about 500Mb because 268Mb
deserved for system, and mali-400MP GPU. Just a slight improvisation from our i8150.
damn you sammy[/QUOTE]
what da hell samsung? uour phone spec isn't low enough for ICS, your bull**** touchwiz blows everything down. crappy marketing strategies

Even Samsung Galaxy S Duos http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_s_duos_s7562-4883.php comes with ICS
Speechless as it is much weaker than our SGW, in term of CPU & GPU, the only thing it wins is the amount of RAM
There are a lot of ICS phones with 512MB RAM from HTC & Sony, if Samsung is willing to give us support, we would get ICS without problem for sure since Samsung got a big team to work it out, really quite a bad support from Samsung for our phone, luckily we got Arco and some developers who work hard to bring ICS to us really thankful to them!

MyDeSTiNaTe said:
Even Samsung Galaxy S Duos http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_s_duos_s7562-4883.php comes with ICS
Speechless as it is much weaker than our SGW, in term of CPU & GPU, the only thing it wins is the amount of RAM
There are a lot of ICS phones with 512MB RAM from HTC & Sony, if Samsung is willing to give us support, we would get ICS without problem for sure since Samsung got a big team to work it out, really quite a bad support from Samsung for our phone, luckily we got Arco and some developers who work hard to bring ICS to us really thankful to them!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes this is right. support al the dev!!

I always look at the bright side of this.
If sammy release update ICS or JB, then we will loose the excitement of custom ROM.
What I mean is like the waiting time of new custom ROM version, the moment when devs release new update and we download it and flash it to our beloved SGW. It's so exciting!!!
Here, we have many custom ROMs and every new release is getting better and better. To be honest, I might prefer custom ROM. Because even if sammy release update, I'm sure it will full with sammy's bloatware.
One day, I met other SGW user. He is just a regular user and don't know anything about flashing. He looked at my phone and say: whoaa..!!! how did you do that?? Can you do it to my phone??
My point is: I DON'T CARE if sammy release update or not. As long as there are custom ROMs, that's more than enough for me

maybe we are not worried about this because there are custom rom. but I feel sorry for those who use stock rom and hope about rom upgrade.

hotheabilly said:
http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_gal...786.php?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
wat da fak sammy?
that phone have similar hardware configuration like our phone, just 800Mhz dual core cpu and 768Mb ram, I guess its about 500Mb because 268Mb
deserved for system, and mali-400MP GPU. Just a slight improvisation from our i8150.
damn you sammy
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seconded!!!!
And the salt into the wound is that the Galaxy Ace 2 is £70 cheaper on O2 Uk pay as you go than my Galaxy W was 10 months ago
ianfebriyanto said:
maybe we are not worried about this because there are custom rom. .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes but surely ROMs like Cyanogen 9 would be much further along and have taken less time to develop and debug if an official Sammy ICS ROM for Galaxy W had been available as a starting point for modding/improving.

opexblue said:
I always look at the bright side of this.
If sammy release update ICS or JB, then we will loose the excitement of custom ROM.
What I mean is like the waiting time of new custom ROM version, the moment when devs release new update and we download it and flash it to our beloved SGW. It's so exciting!!!
Here, we have many custom ROMs and every new release is getting better and better. To be honest, I might prefer custom ROM. Because even if sammy release update, I'm sure it will full with sammy's bloatware.
One day, I met other SGW user. He is just a regular user and don't know anything about flashing. He looked at my phone and say: whoaa..!!! how did you do that?? Can you do it to my phone??
My point is: I DON'T CARE if sammy release update or not. As long as there are custom ROMs, that's more than enough for me
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you're not completely right, for example if we had official ics we would not reverse engineer camera and some other hw, so creating 4.x customs would be easier, but we had just to rely on our devs and huawei u8860 software
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda premium

opexblue said:
I always look at the bright side of this.
If sammy release update ICS or JB, then we will loose the excitement of custom ROM.
What I mean is like the waiting time of new custom ROM version, the moment when devs release new update and we download it and flash it to our beloved SGW. It's so exciting!!!
Here, we have many custom ROMs and every new release is getting better and better. To be honest, I might prefer custom ROM. Because even if sammy release update, I'm sure it will full with sammy's bloatware.
One day, I met other SGW user. He is just a regular user and don't know anything about flashing. He looked at my phone and say: whoaa..!!! how did you do that?? Can you do it to my phone??
My point is: I DON'T CARE if sammy release update or not. As long as there are custom ROMs, that's more than enough for me
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Developers would be able to customized ICS if a stock ICS is already available than creating from scratch. ICS is different from GB. Thats why devs are having difficulties in fixing stuffs like camera for phones that do not have ICS. Devs would love to use working libs for ICS phone-related components. Then porting JB would be much faster too since little is different from ICS.
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda premium

hotheabilly said:
http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_gal...786.php?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
wat da fak sammy?
that phone have similar hardware configuration like our phone, just 800Mhz dual core cpu and 768Mb ram, I guess its about 500Mb because 268Mb
deserved for system, and mali-400MP GPU. Just a slight improvisation from our i8150.
damn you sammy
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
trueeeeeeeeeeeee

dimaka1256 said:
you're not completely right, for example if we had official ics we would not reverse engineer camera and some other hw, so creating 4.x customs would be easier, but we had just to rely on our devs and huawei u8860 software
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
bbmadzky said:
Developers would be able to customized ICS if a stock ICS is already available than creating from scratch. ICS is different from GB. Thats why devs are having difficulties in fixing stuffs like camera for phones that do not have ICS. Devs would love to use working libs for ICS phone-related components. Then porting JB would be much faster too since little is different from ICS.
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I realize that. But I also know that pissing off to sammy and curse them won't change anything.
What I mean is instead of pissing off to sammy, we should be grateful because we have devs that work very hard porting ICS for our phone.
Sent from my Wonderphone GT-I8150 Ancora

Jelly Bean comes to support phone with NFC device. I think that the cause of the making jelly Bean to Ace 2. Don't worry guys... We have development Forum, we have developers and we have Arco. Not to mention, but ace 2 has no their own thread. You check on search box, no ace 2 comes out. Lol. Probably that's why Sammy feel pity for them and make them a jelly Bean. LMFAO.
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda premium

azhiekurosaki said:
Jelly Bean comes to support phone with NFC device. I think that the cause of the making jelly Bean to Ace 2. Don't worry guys... We have development Forum, we have developers and we have Arco. Not to mention, but ace 2 has no their own thread. You check on search box, no ace 2 comes out. Lol. Probably that's why Sammy feel pity for them and make them a jelly Bean. LMFAO.
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+2 saki!!!
u hv d nutz..

azhiekurosaki said:
Jelly Bean comes to support phone with NFC device. I think that the cause of the making jelly Bean to Ace 2. Don't worry guys... We have development Forum, we have developers and we have Arco. Not to mention, but ace 2 has no their own thread. You check on search box, no ace 2 comes out. Lol. Probably that's why Sammy feel pity for them and make them a jelly Bean. LMFAO.
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are u trying to bullying ace 2 ? LOL
Sent from My Galaxy Ace 2

hotheabilly said:
http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_gal...786.php?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
wat da fak sammy?
that phone have similar hardware configuration like our phone, just 800Mhz dual core cpu and 768Mb ram, I guess its about 500Mb because 268Mb
deserved for system, and mali-400MP GPU. Just a slight improvisation from our i8150.
damn you sammy
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I really wish this was true, and I wish Sammy would bring this update out NOW!
Not because I have one of these phones, but because that firmware could be the base for the developers working on our Wonder. That means it's gonna be easier to port, and we'll have a stable CM10 in no time! :highfive:

Related

Gingerbread 2.3.7 ????

What about this new android version? Are we able to install it? Is it compatible with our phone? Or at least it worth it to install it ?
fedmadcl said:
What about this new android version? Are we able to install it? Is it compatible with our phone? Or at least it worth it to install it ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Compatible for sure, but as far as I know just a couple of bugfixes. So wouldn't be something you would "see".
The major changes would be if we would get it with CM7 or CM9.
greets
THE-E
Sure! But with that we will be having the ICS or?
fedmadcl said:
Sure! But with that we will be having the ICS or?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM7: Highly customized Gingerbread (2.3.7)
CM9: Highly customized Ice Cream Sandwich (4.0.0)
[I'm guessin CM8 is Honeycomb, but I don't know anything about tablets so I could be completely wrong]
fender90 said:
CM7: Highly customized Gingerbread (2.3.7)
CM9: Highly customized Ice Cream Sandwich (4.0.0)
[I'm guessin CM8 is Honeycomb, but I don't know anything about tablets so I could be completely wrong]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you recommend install the CM7? Or better wait the ICS....??? IF we get it...
fedmadcl said:
Do you recommend install the CM7? Or better wait the ICS....??? IF we get it...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is no CM7 out, is there? I mean a stable usable version.
So whatever comes first and is stable, go for it ;-)
greets
THE-E
THE-E said:
There is no CM7 out, is there? I mean a stable usable version.
So whatever comes first and is stable, go for it ;-)
greets
THE-E
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is no CM avaiable for our phone... yet. They will both come though.
KezraPlanes is working on CM7, while arco68 already has a bootable CM9.
It's just a matter of time
fender90 said:
There is no CM avaiable for our phone... yet. They will both come though.
KezraPlanes is working on CM7, while arco68 already has a bootable CM9.
It's just a matter of time
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And what about samsung??? Do they will release ICS on our SGW? I heard some news that only on the S2, tablets and some other one... But not on ours... I'm impressed on how underated is this phone, even though it can be compared with a Galaxy S or even others which qualify for an ICS...
fedmadcl said:
And what about samsung??? Do they will release ICS on our SGW? I heard some news that only on the S2, tablets and some other one... But not on ours... I'm impressed on how underated is this phone, even though it can be compared with a Galaxy S or even others which qualify for an ICS...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think it will ever be updated officially.
Samsung has a... "weird"... marketing policy that says our money is worth less than the money other people spend to buy top class phones.
fender90 said:
I don't think it will ever be updated officially.
Samsung has a... "weird"... marketing policy that says our money is worth less than the money other people spend to buy top class phones.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed.....but who cares what Samsung does......
There will be CM7......and ICS......in good time.......and no thanks to Samsung.......
It will be the Community which does it!!!
And it will be better without Samsung TW stuff, etc
robbing huge resources to no great effect.....
Just like my last phone, ZTE Blade..
Orange never released even Froyo 2.2......
But the community produced numerous fantastic GB ROM's, and there is also Cyanogen officially supported......
all this and more will come.....it is just a matter of time.
Sent from my GT-I8150 using Tapatalk
Yeahh bro..!!this is one my favorite topics about Sammy's ****..who care about an official update..
u will get an ICS update soon...but maybe when Google hve release a update 8.0..
Don't ask with our device's father...Sammy's just abandoned his son from early birth...
We do have a stepfather who care much about us..its XDA..!!so,stay tuned..!
sent from another space
Exactly now we have :
1. GingerBread 2.3.6
2. ASAP...IceCream 4.0.1
3. GingerBread 2.3.7 on CM7..WIP
If anyone can develop on Froyo then the development is complete...they are still people out there crazy over Froyo
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda premium
And guess what!! There is the new version of Chrome Browser (BETA) for Android.... Not a chance for SGW... Only applicable with ICS... grrrhh!!!
CM9
hey all
@acro68 is courently working on CM9
fedmadcl said:
And what about samsung??? Do they will release ICS on our SGW? I heard some news that only on the S2, tablets and some other one... But not on ours... I'm impressed on how underated is this phone, even though it can be compared with a Galaxy S or even others which qualify for an ICS...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You just have to let it go with Samsung and their crappy marketing policies.
The shelf-life for our phone was decided to be very short.
Imagine: a mid-range phone with the latest iteration of Android. The sales of top-end phones will decrease dramatically.
That's why HTC, which is far more lungimirant about that, presented at the MWC the One V, same RAM but less clock on the processor, and guess what, with ICS.
God I hate you Samsung.

HTC Sense on Galaxy Nexus

I found that in the Nexus S forum that there is a HTC Sense ROM version launched as a beta. I would love to see it running on our GNex since the hardware is simular it should be possible.
The problem with Sense was that the battery drain was huge. But since GNex and HD2 devs managed to solve this in better kernels it should be possible to make it run like a charm on our GNex
I came from HTC HD2 and we had so much different ROM to flash like: WP7, all andriod version, windows 95, ubuntu, meego and much more... I kinda mis that on the GNex. A lot of HD2 devs are working on GNex so I hope that we have those possibilities also in the near future.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App
I had a nexus s from what it looked like sense was hard as hell to get running.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App
I don't think that will be happening. HTC doesn't use PowerVR or TI OMAP so proprietary stuff like that would be a ***** and it might not be worth the trouble. Also...you bought a nexus phone for the stock Android experience and latest and greatest...WHY WOULD YOU WANT TO KILL IT WITH FIRE?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App
Kinda beats the idea of having a Nexus if you ask me.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
I really don't understand people on here!! If you want Sense, buy a HTC phone!!! People buy nexus's because they cant stand the skinning of manufacturers, and now people are asking for touchwiz and sense ports, which just slow the phone down! WWWHHHYYYY?!?!?!
people also buy the Gnex becuase of its developer support. Most people here love flashing stuff and though I love stock ICS I would love to try out the latest touchwiz or sense as well
One, i didnt bought the phone for plain ics experience but due to the hardware specs.
Two, I hope that the device will get more options in flashing ROMs. Not cuz i like Sense roms but just cuz its possible. And i'm more into plain ics dont get me wrong, also my HD2 had plain ICS without Sense cuz it runs better.
Thirth, I hope that ppl will see smartphones as "normal" computers and see the possibilities of running and developing other OS then Andriod. A lot of people are so short sighted and focus only on the Andriod experience. But there is more capable with the device .. so much more.
Take Ubuntu for example, most of our kernels are based on the ubuntu kernel. Its possible to run plain Ubuntu. The experience would be like a laptop. You can connect it to a screen and add a mouse. Ofcourse you could make a dual boot with the choice of ics and the other system with Haret. Running ICS as native OS and booting Ubuntu from internal storage with Haret.
Dont get me wrong I love the phone as it is and I love the way ICS works and would use it always as daily use. But from developing perspective there are so much more possibilities wich also can give the GNex a lot bigger status as best phone =)
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App
Btw the only thing not working correct one the Nexus S Sense ROM is wifi and its driver related. Ppl like Cotulla or TyTung have made a custom driver (wifi, gpsa, camera and lots more) so its not impossible .
I truely loved to see how ppl managed to make a custom driver for a camera and how it worked code wise since the standard device drivers are closed source. In my opinion those ppl are truely DEVs like the kernel builders. Crappy apps or game programmers arent true DEVs in my opinion .. i'm a app/game/web programmer my self and dont consider my self to be a true mobile DEV.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App
casserly said:
people also buy the Gnex becuase of its developer support. Most people here love flashing stuff and though I love stock ICS I would love to try out the latest touchwiz or sense as well
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bingo! 10 char
Brilliant. There are so many different launchers and really nice widgets on the Market. I just don't understand why somebody would like to kill his phone with Sense or Touchwiz. Latest Sense even looks like Launcher Pro. We do have the after Sense isn't it?
Sense isn't impossible as long as you port Sense, and not the whole damn rom. Biggest issue we saw when we tried a while back was gralloc. That may be less an issue now that there are ICS versions of Sense out there now.
I just read Team BAMF have something in the works as far as sense on the gnex.....
B-Mod said:
I just read Team BAMF have something in the works as far as sense on the gnex.....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That would be news to me, and it shouldn't be.
adrynalyne said:
That would be news to me, and it shouldn't be.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://www.teambamf.net/f56/sense-rom-3653/
Well,
Being the date on that is in December ...
The poster was incorrect as we made no such announcement. We do have 'sick' stuff in the works, but its not Sense. Our Sense expert gave it a shot and without having ICS HTC kernel source, its unlikely to work any time soon.
adrynalyne said:
Well,
Being the date on that is in December ...
The poster was incorrect as we made no such announcement. We do have 'sick' stuff in the works, but its not Sense. Our Sense expert gave it a shot and without having ICS HTC kernel source, its unlikely to work any time soon.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So when the source for the HTC One X gets released then it will be possible?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
adrynalyne said:
Well,
Being the date on that is in December ...
The poster was incorrect as we made no such announcement. We do have 'sick' stuff in the works, but its not Sense. Our Sense expert gave it a shot and without having ICS HTC kernel source, its unlikely to work any time soon.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah old news, but now you have expert HTC man joelz9614 on the team
xl DIGITAL lx said:
So when the source for the HTC One X gets released then it will be possible?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know exactly. Erishasnobattery is the one who attempted it. I believe there were gralloc issues. Back then, we had no ICS Sense to work with though, so I don't know, it may be entirely possible now.
Hey...We should get this going!
Really unnecessary bump.
Either way, it's all about choice, people buy this phone for superior development, so people just like options.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW

Android 4.1 Jelly Bean SDK AVAILABLE

Android 4.1 Jelly Bean ​
Android 4.1 will get interactive notifications, overhauled search results, faster touch-screen response, and a tool to tell people information they may want to know about what's going on nearby and what they might need to know.
http://developer.android.com/about/versions/android-4.1.html
http://developer.android.com/sdk/index.html
I like it. Nice adjusments. Better than other i..OS-es in my opinion. Looking forward for the port.
Deonix said:
I like it. Nice adjusments. Better than other i..OS-es in my opinion. Looking forward for the port.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If we get one. Ics is enough of a pain in the backside to get working with the defy.
Sent from my MB525 using xda app-developers app
jelly bean on defy?
There may be a future development of android jelly bean for defy ? Or he does not have enough hardware?
froyo was best for defy
GB was compatible
ICS not so compatible
JB don't know if any possibilities
popcorn1122 said:
froyo was best for defy
GB was compatible
ICS not so compatible
JB don't know if any possibilities
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i think a bit different
FROYO was the worst for defy
GB was very good
ICS is definitely the best ( some exceptions though )
JB - maybe it would be even better
Shubhamqweasd said:
i think a bit different
FROYO was the worst for defy
GB was very good
ICS is definitely the best ( some exceptions though )
JB - maybe it would be even better
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I totally agree that Froyo was the worst, it's so slow and ugly :silly: Gingerbread was a huge improvement and Ice Cream Sandwich is an even bigger improvement, but at the moment not all the power of it can be harnessed by our DEFY, so I'd say that Gingerbread is the best. But Motorola is to blame for that, cause with those proper custom kernels, ICS would be flying So, if no way for custom kernels to run arises, I'm guessing that troubles with missing libraries will be even bigger with Jelly Bean, so we might just not even see a CM based on JB for DEFY
Found the Jellybean wallpapers and the new bootanimation over at Android authority!
>>>>>Android Jelly Bean Goodies<<<<<
Has anyone tried the new Jelly Bean VoiceSearch/GoogleQuickSearchBox on our ICS builds yet? I've been searching all over, no-one has yet to post it. You guys had any luck?
I've just tried Jelly Bean on Galaxy Nexus, it's way more faster than ICS because it has this Project Butter (newer hwa) which makes UI constant on 60FPS, so no more UI lags!
Jelly Bean is based on ICS so there won't be so much trouble about porting it because we already have ICS
I think the main question would be whether Project Butter will run with our Froyo/GB Kernel we have to stick with?!
This is one of Epsylon3's posts on Google+. He's just awesome!
Thats great !!
He can takes his time, we will apreciate it very much anyway.
defy developers are really making effort.
I didn't see that on any other device forums
The efforts have been fruitful since the long study made by our developers . They made it easy . since once you get to know how things work . and how the ideas are and what kernel functions and codes u shd be actually knowing . It becomes lots easy for implementation
The Best of The Best of the BEST Dev World
As said : Our defy Devs is the most talented and supportive in all thread with even an locked BL , Don,t know how to give them the deserved appreciation
swapnil360 said:
This is one of Epsylon3's posts on Google+. He's just awesome!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awesome..
Sent from my MB526 using XDA
I want to know how ep3 it's going to manage the fact that chrome it's the default web explorer in jelly bean when it's not yet functional in ice cream sandwich...
Enviado desde mi MB526 usando Tapatalk 2
swapnil360 said:
This is one of Epsylon3's posts on Google+. He's just awesome!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it will awesome for all of us , if it happened some how , our developers are best of all others ,
we were just given eclair , we had froyo(modded roms) , GB roms ( best and great performance ) , and we had ICS all good , except some issues due to locked bootloaders, otherwise we at this time could had best ICS rom Available ....... developers are trying their best working day & night for us ,
I am sure that we all will have jelly bean ,( not fully functional though ), but our great developers will make it happen for us all .......
once this Bootloader thing gets solved some how , can't say how ,
we gonna have rocking roms with overall best performance than all the device present in this xda forum ...... and i can bet on this ......
atlast thanks to all the developers of DEFY & DEFY PLUS .......
LIVEPROOF

Good news:bangprovn will start new project in cm10!!!

http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=29992622&postcount=217
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1790721&page=22
He or she said:
Sorry for discontinuing this project. I will start new project in cm10 so i dont have time to continue cm7 . Sorry again
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app
new update: he or she said: Will start to build on this sunday
Not to sound like an ass but honestly CM7 looks and feels really dated now and with a more stable CM9 for our phone and hopefully CM10 on the way I rather more effort is focused on ICS and JB ROMs rather than CM7 since we already have good GB ROMs for the SGW.
Just Another★Gamer said:
Not to sound like an ass but honestly CM7 looks and feels really dated now and with a more stable CM9 for our phone and hopefully CM10 on the way I rather more effort is focused on ICS and JB ROMs rather than CM7 since we already have good GB ROMs for the SGW.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you mean outdated? :laugh:
FelixAusChina said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=29992622&postcount=217
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1790721&page=22
He or she said:
Sorry for discontinuing this project. I will start new project in cm10 so i dont have time to continue cm7 . Sorry again
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
whoaa... really? hope for that become true. can't wait for that.
Just Another★Gamer said:
Not to sound like an ass but honestly CM7 looks and feels really dated now and with a more stable CM9 for our phone and hopefully CM10 on the way I rather more effort is focused on ICS and JB ROMs rather than CM7 since we already have good GB ROMs for the SGW.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not agree with you.
First, there is not a finished and stable CM rom and is not so good start with new projects at this point.
Why?
Because gingerbred on galaxy w is simply perfect and there is no reason or features in CM9 or in CM10 that justify porting and waste of resources and time.
I hope that someone will finish CM7 job.
willypt said:
Do you mean outdated? :laugh:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea, its early in the morning so its a little obvious i'll make mistakes.
kbytek said:
I'm not agree with you.
First, there is not a finished and stable CM rom and is not so good start with new projects at this point.
Why?
Because gingerbred on galaxy w is simply perfect and there is no reason or features in CM9 or in CM10 that justify porting and waste of resources and time.
I hope that someone will finish CM7 job.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well your welcome to disagree, i'm not forcing my opinion on you or anyone just stating what I think.
There is no finished CM ROM but stable I honestly think the latest CM9 build is stable for daily use and not so good, lol CM9 runs graphic heavy games a whole lot better than GB even when its OC.
Oh yes GB is much much smoother and better than ICS and JB, sigh. There are already good GB ROMs for the SGW so is it such a big deal that someone wants to drop making CM7 and start doing the newest CM10 for our phone its their choice and if I had skills I rather take my shot and making CM9 and CM10 for our phone better rather than stick with ye old CM7.
Just Another★Gamer said:
Yea, its early in the morning so its a little obvious i'll make mistakes.
Well your welcome to disagree, i'm not forcing my opinion on you or anyone just stating what I think.
There is no finished CM ROM but stable I honestly think the latest CM9 build is stable for daily use and not so good, lol CM9 runs graphic heavy games a whole lot better than GB even when its OC.
Oh yes GB is much much smoother and better than ICS and JB, sigh. There are already good GB ROMs for the SGW so is it such a big deal that someone wants to drop making CM7 and start doing the newest CM10 for our phone its their choice and if I had skills I rather take my shot and making CM9 and CM10 for our phone better rather than stick with ye old CM7.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed. I just can say, " go for the CM10". I want to live the future not the past...
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda premium
Actually, I'm supporting the development of CM9 and CM10 because 'in case of' the ROM becomes standard, I don't have to learn it.
Take an example of the ye old Win XP
Nowadays, Windows 7 has become the new standard of the computing world (of Windows, obviously).
Yes, you can still make Windows XP compatible program (with more cost and testing) , but can you assure that your program (which is made in .. say Win 7 with .NET Framework 3.5 / 4) could run w/o prob in Windows XP while your program works seamlessly in Win 7?
My point here is that we have to take measure on which ROM has brighter future? Will GB be updated again, with more fantastic feature, or will ICS and JB got them?
The problem is that there will be a hell lot of bugs, maybe even a brick... So when I try a new ROM, best I wait till it has only a few bugs that can be replaced with 3rd party apps (eg. Fm radio)
What do you think?
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy W (GT-I8150) with CM9 Alpha 6.
there will be a hell lot of bugs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, bug may exists but that been always a good news if someone try port rom for us!
at least we have a good starting point, cm9 which can be considered as fully working now :good:
Well, If he's really going to port CM10 for us, I hope he knows that may need to rewrite all the drivers again, like in ICS. And I remember he said in CM7 port topic that he doesn't know very much about kernel and drivers development, Oisis was helping him. I thought he should finish CM7 first, but If he consider better to start CM10, so let's go. I'll try to start studying better of kernel development for helping'em out. Like arco's said before, our community has an lack of kernel developers.
fredamsouza said:
Well, If he's really going to port CM10 for us, I hope he knows that may need to rewrite all the drivers again, like in ICS. And I remember he said in CM7 port topic that he doesn't know very much about kernel and drivers development, Oisis was helping him. I thought he should finish CM7 first, but If he consider better to start CM10, so let's go. I'll try to start studying better of kernel development for helping'em out. Like arco's said before, our community has an lack of kernel developers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah we need all the support we can get (says the guy who doesn't know a thing about kernels and stuff)...
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy W (GT-I8150) with CM9 Alpha 6.
iDelta said:
The problem is that there will be a hell lot of bugs, maybe even a brick... So when I try a new ROM, best I wait till it has only a few bugs that can be replaced with 3rd party apps (eg. Fm radio)
What do you think?
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy W (GT-I8150) with CM9 Alpha 6.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Arco encounters 2 hard bricks + several soft bricks when porting CM9
fredamsouza said:
Well, If he's really going to port CM10 for us, I hope he knows that may need to rewrite all the drivers again, like in ICS. And I remember he said in CM7 port topic that he doesn't know very much about kernel and drivers development, Oisis was helping him. I thought he should finish CM7 first, but If he consider better to start CM10, so let's go. I'll try to start studying better of kernel development for helping'em out. Like arco's said before, our community has an lack of kernel developers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's easier than upgrade from gb to ics. I don't know much about writing driver so i think i will make a bootable cm10 and the rest is for others developer
bangprovn said:
It's easier than upgrade from gb to ics. I don't know much about writing driver so i think i will make a bootable cm10 and the rest is for others developer
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hope you will success ~
Its the right decision, in my opinion - working on a Gingerbread-ROM does not make any sense at the moment - From features to smoothness, ICS is by far the better choice. Although RAM is a bottleneck for some purposes on the Galaxy W, the device as a whole has enough power to profit from the enhancements that came with ICS and JB.
@bangprovn, would you please release your CM7 source code/repo over github or other repos hosting share with maybe some note howto compile it, I have try it but no luck, stuck on brunch ancora command.
It says there is no ancora device code or sumtim like that
On ur cm7 threat osiris had some patch 4 wifi driver, but I'm sure there are some config on device.mk should be aligned correctly, and I think I could learn easily read ur porting process than I have to start from zero, with your mentoring maybe.
Sorry for my bad english
i am exciting~~ for cm10
I'm really looking forward to this!!
bangprovn said:
It's easier than upgrade from gb to ics. I don't know much about writing driver so i think i will make a bootable cm10 and the rest is for others developer
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This will be a powerhouse and fast development in CM10 for our phone. A period of 3-4 months, we have a stable CM ROM.

Jelly Bean, does it even benefit the Ace 2?

I don't know, ever since I updated to the leaked 4.1, my phone just hasn't felt the same. It locks up 24/7, especially with the YouTube app. When I completely wiped my phone to put on the official firmware when it was released, it was even worse! Now I'm on the amazing Sakura Droid CM 10, which is awesome, cus I have unlimited 3G internet anyway. Ever since I switched to that, NONE of the problems I had existed.
My question is, is Jelly Bean for the Ace 2 poorly optimized? My phone ran MUCH better on 2.3.6.
I'd like to add that on my S2, it is also the same, though not as much. (Faster boot, fixes lockups faster).
I'm guessing it isn't optimized for the ARM processors.
TotallyNotMikey said:
I don't know, ever since I updated to the leaked 4.1, my phone just hasn't felt the same. It locks up 24/7, especially with the YouTube app. When I completely wiped my phone to put on the official firmware when it was released, it was even worse! Now I'm on the amazing Sakura Droid CM 10, which is awesome, cus I have unlimited 3G internet anyway. Ever since I switched to that, NONE of the problems I had existed.
My question is, is Jelly Bean for the Ace 2 poorly optimized? My phone ran MUCH better on 2.3.6.
I'd like to add that on my S2, it is also the same, though not as much. (Faster boot, fixes lockups faster).
I'm guessing it isn't optimized for the ARM processors.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i think of you already have unlimited internet you can flash cyanogen mod its better than stock samsung jb firmware
but yes thhe samsung jb firmware is POOOOORLY OPTIMIZED FOR OUR DEVICE
gingerbread actually is better and faster in everything
but its too old now, thats the problem
and what is the point if this thread?
Sent from my GT-I8160 using xda app-developers app
Dr01nE said:
and what is the point if this thread?
Sent from my GT-I8160 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mostly to see if it's a phone problem or an OS problem. Looks like an OS problem.
CM10 is JB...
I love CM10 coz it has a Theme chooser ...
Sent from my GT-I8160 using xda premium
Yesterday I flashed MC8 over GB and it's been working fine since then. Even the AnTuTu score is better than in GB: 5974 vs 5800 or sth.
Sent from my GT-I8160 using xda app-developers app
TotallyNotMikey said:
I don't know, ever since I updated to the leaked 4.1, my phone just hasn't felt the same. It locks up 24/7, especially with the YouTube app. When I completely wiped my phone to put on the official firmware when it was released, it was even worse! Now I'm on the amazing Sakura Droid CM 10, which is awesome, cus I have unlimited 3G internet anyway. Ever since I switched to that, NONE of the problems I had existed.
My question is, is Jelly Bean for the Ace 2 poorly optimized? My phone ran MUCH better on 2.3.6.
I'd like to add that on my S2, it is also the same, though not as much. (Faster boot, fixes lockups faster).
I'm guessing it isn't optimized for the ARM processors.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you mean ST-Erricson processor? since most android phone out there use ARM processor
Jesus... where do you guys get your information?
ST-Ericsson, Qualcomm etc., they all utilize the general architecture of RISC(Reduced instruction set computing) managed, developed and promoted by ARM Holdings.
Thus, any processor that respects their core design is an ARM processor. Just different brands implementing the same general architecture.
And if the thread starter used any of the leaked beta roms, it's no wonder his phone works poorly.

Categories

Resources