Tizen 1.0 Larkspur SDK and Source Code Release - Bada Software and Hacking General

For more details visit the website
https://www.tizen.org/blogs/tsg/2012/tizen-1.0-larkspur
Will we see Tizen soon in our devices?

Yes.
Samsung is very famous as lightning fast.
See how long bada 2...
So we have Tizen soooon in 1 or 2 years...
Best Regards

someone already started portin tizen on the wave s8500
but the threat is locked so there is no new information about progres
and i think it was the first beta of tizen
www . badaforums . net /forums/tizen-general/tizen-flashing-t6443.html

Great
It seems to be good.
Maybe a Tizen section should be added in xda ?

They are developing Tizen on very similiar device to SGS2 (same CPU, same CP, similiar board), I don't think they will ever want to backport it to Wave series.

Yes Samsung won't port it. No doubt. We can't expect anything from them. We saw how long they take to release and to roll out bada 2 for less than 5 devices.... a year now... And no official release for every body.
But I'm confident and I think that a unofficial port is possible.

...and I think that a unofficial port is possible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Come on...
Nothing learned ?
SDK and new OS is ever blablaballaballa...
The magic is talented Developers...
If you can write Programs, then you can port it to many systems...
Example...
You don't need Windows 7, 8, 9 or Win 1000... to play Solitaire.
Or Crysis 2 runs perfect on XP...
Same for handsets. It is absolute buxxshxttx to change OS...
bada 1.x Apis are perfect for Games...
There are other reasons why not so much good stuff available...
Don't waste your time with Tizen for S8500, S8530 etc...
Its only wet dream.
Best Regards

I'm shared about your answer. I know that it is a hard to port an OS.
I know that the hardware capacity are important and that the Waves are becoming old. I don't expect a smooth and ultra fast Tizen.
But for me running is running. Before I get my Wave I was with a super slow Omnia I900 (even with the WM6.1 stock Rom). Samsung doesn't updated the device (uhm... it doesn't changed...) with WM 6.5 and devs made the update. It was working,no more.
What I want to say is that now nobody is happy of the power of their "toys" (PC,tablet,smartphone...). For sure I think it is better for our toys to be the fluent and efficient as possible. The best is to get the right balance between efficiency and the possibilities that offers you the OS.
Moreover we(especially I in fact) don't know if this OS need a lot of resources or not. It is not because the OS has been developed with a SGS2 that it requires such hardware.
There are actually three possibilities :
-Tizen is a light OS runnable by nearly all device.
-Tizen is a plump OS. Then it can be run with some tweaks.
-Tizen requires so much resources that it can only be bootable with recent device.
After knowing which kind of OS we have we can say wheter it is possible or not.
I know that being optimistic isn't good. I take the risk to be disapointed that you take
I hope you will be suprised. Even if you have more chance than me to be right.

Hi again
I've downloaded Tizen SDK and Emulator. I found file which is running in emulator, it's hm system file. Maybe if we found a metod to extract, we can explore Tizen OS files. Can anybody extract it, or have idea how to do it ?
Programs\tizen_sdk\Emulator\x86\emulimg-1.0.x86

Soxix said:
There are actually three possibilities :
-Tizen is a light OS runnable by nearly all device.
-Tizen is a plump OS. Then it can be run with some tweaks.
-Tizen requires so much resources that it can only be bootable with recent device.
After knowing which kind of OS we have we can say wheter it is possible or not.
I know that being optimistic isn't good. I take the risk to be disapointed that you take
I hope you will be suprised. Even if you have more chance than me to be right.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
none of this really matters, getting an OS to "run" on the Samsung Wave S8500/S8530 devices has been done, and could certainly get done to the same point with Tizen as was done with Android but it would also STOP at the same point - modem driver and fuel guage, people who have the time and coding know-how are needed to work on this specifically for Wave devices, but because of the relatively limited market penetration of the Wave that just hasn't ended up being the case.(remember we haven't been able to find a device that has the modem wired up and coded in the way it has been done on S8500 and S8530) I don't know much about S8600's modem.

Seems also silence about Tizen...
SDK has NO update since April... since first release...
IFA in Berlin is near...
Rumours NO Tizen device in 2012.
So I think no Tizen news on IFA next days...
If you install Tizen SDK, you can find many Samsung Emails...
tizen_installmanager_....log
Best Regards

http://developer.samsung.com/develo...ageNum=&orderby=&blogeh=&sctype=&syear=&stag=
http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/linuxcon/schedule
Tizen seems not dxad yet...
Best Regards

Uuupsi... surprice :cyclops:
New Tizen SDK available...
https://www.tizen.org/
Best Regards
Submitted by tsg on 25 Sep, 2012
Today, we are happy to announce that the Tizen 2.0 alpha source code and SDK are now available. We encourage developers to start working with these new features and functionality and provide feedback that can be used to improve Tizen during the final stages of its development. You can visit the community page to learn more about participating in the Tizen project.
Tizen 2.0 alpha has additional features, tools, and other improvements, including:
Enhanced Web framework that provides better HTML5/W3C API support and more Tizen Device APIs
Multi-process Webkit2-based Web Runtime which provides better security and reliability for Web applications
Advanced HTML5 features such as video subtitles and captions, battery status API, screen orientation API, <keygen> and <details>, and more
New Tizen Device APIs for file transfer, notifications, and power control
Advanced IDE & SDK for Web application development
Install manager support for snapshot-based network installation
Enhanced support for OpenGL ES
New Platform SDK that helps platform development based on OBS
More information on the release can be found here: https://source.tizen.org/release
We look forward to getting feedback and making additional enhancements to Tizen over the coming months. There are additional components that we plan to add in the coming weeks, and we will continue to fix bugs and add additional features.
We have also documented the complete development process which leverages state-of-the-art open source management and integration tools to accelerate development and high quality releases. We really encourage developers to participate in the Tizen open source project.
Documentation on development and tools can be found here: https://source.tizen.org/os-development
The Tizen Technical Steering Group
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

if some one compile it tell me i try to look and see if we can make boot

http://www.ddaily.co.kr/news/news_view.php?uid=95786
In some german text... I've read something that new Tizen SDK this month possible...
Best Regards

adfree said:
http://www.ddaily.co.kr/news/news_view.php?uid=95786
In some german text... I've read something that new Tizen SDK this month possible...
Best Regards
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can anybody translate few important lines from this Article in English?
is this related to Bada+ Tizen merger and new
(or Same) SDK for Bada 2.0 and Tizen 2.0 ?
tried with Google translator but its tooo bad

http://developer.samsung.com/develo...eNum=1&orderby=&blogeh=E&sctype=&syear=&stag=
On October the 11th, the Linux Foundation held the first Korea Linux Forum in Seoul, Korea, a new Linux event in the APAC region, bringing together a unique blend of core developers, system administrators, users, community managers and industry experts...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Best Regards

https://developer.tizen.org/forums/web-application-development/what-do-building-widget-really-do
Tizen supports two packaging format's, one is "*.tpk" for Tizen C++Apps (aka, native apps) and the other is "*.wgt" for Web apps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Someone saw such C++ type in SDK ?
Best Regards

http://www.stanford.edu/class/cs148/
http://www.stanford.edu/class/cs148/code/tizen_instruction_from_samsung.pdf
No idea if known...
Best Regards

https://www.tizen.org/community/events/2011/linuxcon-europe-2012
Date:
5 November, 2012 (All day) - 7 November, 2012 (All day)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We are tentatively planning to have Tizen sessions or a mini-summit.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Best Regards

Related

WP7 Install on N1

Dear Members,
It's a wierd thought but can WP7 be installed on NexusOne. I would live to test out the WP7, but i have the N1 unit.
Any thoughts ?
Sam
Ask again in a half year.
... but it's the correct CPU architecture (Snapdragon) iirc.
I doubt it would be possible...
There are no drivers for it, and I dont think it meets the minimum spec for WP7.
That's what i think, its the same processor, i dunno the Jargin for the detailed tech comparison, but from the looks of it, it shoudl be do-able, but is it worth the effort ?
Depends how much effort is required. To get started someone need to buy a WP7 phone, which isn't possible for another 3 months. (Or someone from Redmond to leak one).
Ask again in a half year.
You bought Android device that has Android bootloader and Android radio and what not hoping you would run WindowsCE base on it? Are you serious? Chance of getting WP7 or any WinCE kernel running on this (without any emulation or software like haret, even that would be hard to boot CE6 (I prefer "CE6.5" ) kernel) is like... Zero. Only HD2 (mostly TMOUS version due to 1GB ROM) has way bigger chance of getting unofficial update (since our top CE platform expert here aka DaG is working on it).
To general!
~~Tito~~
Maybe, depending on the driver coding for the N1 when compared to shipping HTC WP7 devices.

[Advice]Buy wave or not?

My older thread didn't help me much and this might help me more because now, i'm going to buy a phone within this week but i'm thinking of buying Wave, because of it's 1 ghz cortex a8 processor and GPu PowerVR sgx 540 which is proven to be the fastest among single core processors (not including tegra). To be hoenst, PowerVR sgx 540 performs just like tegra 2 GPU and is more or less the same GPU used in iphone 4.
Question is, which one to buy? keeping in mind that android is comming to wave sooner or later, what do you guys say? do you think android would work on wave (dual boot) so that the bada OS is also secured. Now my options are:
-LG optimus one (around 170$)(wifi is b/g only)
-Samsung wave (Around 299$)
-Samsung galaxy ace (349$)
-Samsung galaxy mini (around 179$)
These are the only phones i want to choose from because others are either expensive or useless (not android). I don't think that galaxy ace would be a very good choice despite the fact that it has no flash support (decreases 50% surfing on internet). About wave is that, bada sucks for now as there aren't cool widgets, apps available. About Optimus One, it is cheap, which is a good thing but the pixels are way too low and it runs a 600mhz processor which cannot run at least 50% of the good games without lag.
Now i can only trust you guys to help me as this will allow me to choose my phone and i really want some good suggestions. Thanks a lot in advance
> Bada Software and Hacking General (No noobs here)
> Asking advice about buy a Samsung Wave
nope.avi
Otacon_ahs said:
> Bada Software and Hacking General (No noobs here)
> Asking advice about buy a Samsung Wave
nope.avi
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry i didn't understand what you mean by "nope.avi" and tbh you seem like a noob to me and yet you're making a useless post
It's too bad that there's no Q & A section for bada or i could've made a thread there :/
keeping in mind that android is comming to wave sooner or later
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
shad0wboss
If you wish Android on Wave (II) you need to wait... long, loooonger, very loooooooooooooooong.
So the answer is later. Much later.
If you can't wait. Then your first choice should be an Android handset.
And yes, sorry. Its very hard to answer as normally we are in Software&Hacking section of XDA...
And this is your second try and buy Thread.
Best Regards
adfree said:
shad0wboss
If you wish Android on Wave (II) you need to wait... long, loooonger, very loooooooooooooooong.
So the answer is later. Much later.
If you can't wait. Then your first choice should be an Android handset.
And yes, sorry. Its very hard to answer as normally we are in Software&Hacking section of XDA...
And this is your second try and buy Thread.
Best Regards
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for your reply, also the project you're working on, does it apply to wave II as well or only for Wave?
Android project is at very very early stadium.
Pre pre Alpha... and oleg_k is the only person who have seen Android on his Wave. NO ONE else.
I have no idea when second person can confirm running Android on Wave.
oleg_k uses additional Hardware called JTAG.
Costs around 200 Euro... see here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=898996
We all have to wait. Maybe weeks, maybe months...
Best Regards
Currently all android ports being worked on are for wave I. So if you are buying waveII, you will have to wait much longer.
Now on your opinion to buy a handset,
1)Do not buy wave in the hope of getting android in it later or sooner. We don't know all the problems we might face after loading android onto our phones. So if you want Android, go for galaxy ace.
2)Bada has a scope of improvement and you can see its progres by taking a look at the app store. Every week some new good games are coming, either ports or original stuff. Now Bada has apps like Fruit Ninja, Plants vs. Zombies, Doodle Jump and many other games which people were longing to see on the samsung app store. Eventually, more apps will arrive. But don't buy Wave if your only interest is apps and widgets. If you can give bada some time, then you can go on to buy the wave.
3)And if you are looking for a rock solid hardware, go for Wave! Wave's hardware can't be matched by any other single core phones for now. The wave in fact has a better gpu than Iphone 4. So Wave is the best bet for your budget. Also the screen quality and Multimedia experience is really amazing. Also its out of the box ability to play almost all of the video formats including Divx HD and Xvid along with subtitles will make you want to buy the Wave. Remember that currently Bada has few problems in properly utilizing the RAM. So you might get memory errors sometimes even though it has more than 512 MB of ram on it. I don't know if the memory issues have been solved on Wave II or not but atleast Wave currently faces this problem.
So now you are left to your choice. My personal recommendation is the Wave! I am saying this after using an Iphone 4(Which got stolen ), an HTC Desire and now my beloved Wave!
My opinion is go with wave because it has wonderful design and no other samsung phones has better design like wave. also bada 2.0 looks more promising..
Maybe we can get android on wave within weeks but it will be pre alpha version and you cant expect all functionalities work and maybe few functionalities will never work.
Multimedia side wave rocks. but if you interested in apps then go for android device..Now your choice
scout for a dual processor
Got Wave II for some days. The biggest problem is lack of apps for bada, which is semi rapidly fixed, samsung is spending alot of cash into its development, so it is getting better month by month (comparing bada 1.0 to 1.2 for eg.).
It has got very powerful CPU and GPU, but haven't seen yet a game that uses more than like 30% of its power, but if you don't mind about games and weird apps like remote sattelite controllers which for sure can be found for Android. If you only want to have smoothly running device with some gadgets - I do recommend it.
astrotom said:
Currently all android ports being worked on are for wave I. So if you are buying waveII, you will have to wait much longer.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As far as I know Wave II is the same hardware as Wave I, except the LCD display. So port for Wave I = port for Wave II with abit different LCD driver.
Rebellos said:
Got Wave II for some days. The biggest problem is lack of apps for bada, which is semi rapidly fixed, samsung is spending alot of cash into its development, so it is getting better month by month (comparing bada 1.0 to 1.2 for eg.).
It has got very powerful CPU and GPU, but haven't seen yet a game that uses more than like 30% of its power, but if you don't mind about games and weird apps like remote sattelite controllers which for sure can be found for Android. If you only want to have smoothly running device with some gadgets - I do recommend it.
As far as I know Wave II is the same hardware as Wave I, except the LCD display. So port for Wave I = port for Wave II with abit different LCD driver.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The hardware might seem equal from outside but there are many internal differences. The main feature still remain the same. If wave II = wave I, then 1.2 update would be available to wave I users as soon as wave II was released. But that is not the case. Wave II use different boot loaders and firmware files. So please read through the forum before to get more info.

port WP7 on wave is it possible?

why we want to port WP7 on wave?
1. at this moment all wp7 phones use same CPU (QSD 8250) and it's GPU was "Adreno 200" --- (SGX543MP2(iPad2) > SGX 543 = Adreno 220 > SGX540 (@300MHz) > Geforce ULP [Tegra2] > SGX 540 (@200MHz) = Mali -400 >> Adreno 205 > SGX 535 >> Adreno 200 = SGX 530.)
2. Our wave have the SGX540 GPU,if wp7 port on wave i think it'll more fast than Adreno 200
3. i hear some news ,microsoft will Release a tool it can port almost all android APP to WP7 so in the Future WP7 will be the NO1
4. wp7 more fast than android
I known it's very hard to do ,it just my opinion if it's wrong please forgive me
sorry for my bad english
3 or 4 users work on Android port, without full function... so NOT successfully finished. Since months.
If you have free time, please start with your project to port WP7...
We all count on you.
Good Luck
Its very hard to port the WP7 to wave because WP7 used only qualcomm processer so far but wave using hummingbird processer..porting android is somewhat easier than WP7 because galaxy s and wave almost share the same hardware..also i dont think you can achieve solid performance in wave with other os..
yes winphone 7 has 18 points at the html5 test, even bada 1.2 has 187 very inteligent. a system that can nothing even playing divx to port it on a device that has a system that can more. you should by a phone7 device, than we all are happy.
Of course, bada is a good system
I think that we don't obtain a significative advance in porting Windows Phone 7 to our waves, because Win7 doesn't have much more apps and it is not as extended as Android. You can try with MeeGo or Maemo but the result will be the same: not a really benefit.
The only OSs which are really interesting are iOS (extremely difficult to port) and Android (which oleg_k and the other devs are working at).
yes android is the best os to port, and maybe ios, would also be possible the wave and iphone are nearly the same in things of hardware.
Porting ANY closed-source operating system is next to impossible. The effort required for such a task is way out of scale and would require dozens of high class experts doing disassembly and binary patching, custom drivers, etc.
Phones hardware platforms are based on dedicated PCB layouts and even having same components in different phones gives no guarantee they are connected same way, to same processor PINs, not mentioning that same processor types come in different packaging. When the phone is not based on the very SAME board as 'donor' device, you can simply forget about putting closed-source OS there.
what about mango, tango, apollo?
what about mango, tango, apollo?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, very easy task. Also Zumba, Pumba and Dumba possible.
Best Regards
adfree said:
Yes, very easy task. Also Zumba, Pumba and Dumba possible.
Best Regards
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think the only possible OS besides Android is maybe HP's WebOS. Even if it's half losed source, it's built on top of linux just as Android and the root image is accessible (I already downloaded it ). But even this would be a risky project, as the kernel is not the same version (WebOS 2.2.1 is built on 2.6.29 if I remember well) and the video driver and phone part is totally different...
adfree said:
Yes, very easy task. Also Zumba, Pumba and Dumba possible.
Best Regards
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL!!! i didnt ask if its possible or not. but they said porting wp7 is not interesting .
maybe pumba possible? )
adfree said:
Yes, very easy task. Also Zumba, Pumba and Dumba possible.
Best Regards
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what about Mumba, Sumba and Kumba ??
ispanecaaaa said:
what about Mumba, Sumba and Kumba ??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And there we go... Now microsoft have to choose new names for windows 7.2, 7.3 and 7.4 :-/ ;-p
duxxyuk said:
And there we go... Now microsoft have to choose new names for windows 7.2, 7.3 and 7.4 :-/ ;-p
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pumba would be great
LOL... DUMBa is a great name for the next microsoft release
i can´t see any advantage is porting wp7 to wave
in fact the only advantages i see in porting android is because of the zillion apps available and the fact its an open OS
if i could have all those apps (or even half..) for bada, i would keep bada
i tried some android phones and some wm7 phones and i feel them slower than my wave 8500
the only 1 that feels as speedy as the wave is the iphone 4
ispanecaaaa said:
what about Mumba, Sumba and Kumba ??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol
yes i found some opensource apps, maybe some of them can be ported easy, the games should be easier cause they all using opengl, thank god that the opensource community exists.
my brother has a wp7 phone and i love it. i search through the market and it has lot of interesting games and apps(wp7 was released after bada). imo its much better than bada.
73nokian said:
my brother has a wp7 phone and i love it. i search through the market and it has lot of interesting games and apps(wp7 was released after bada). imo its much better than bada.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So sell bada phone and buy something with WP. Nobody keep you here

samsung wave lite and bada 2.0

i need to know how if is possible to update a samsung wave lite gt-s5250(i don t know if 3g,phone is not mine)
it has bada 1.1.can i update it to 2.0?
is 2.0 stable?
thanks
I have not seen a firmware for the small waves out there which contains 2.0.
Maybe you will have to wait and see, but Samsung confirmed 2.0 on all its devices.
Regards
is there any update?
like 1.2 or something else?
kylon said:
is there any update?
like 1.2 or something else?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://samfirmware.com
so we must wait until september? 1 september?
Maybe you can give you self an answer...
If latest S5780 bada handset has only bada 1.1, it is also based on Broadcom Hardware/Software like the other family of light:
S5250
S5330
S5750
S7230
How big is the chance in near future to update to 1.2... or bada 2.0...
Btw... bada 2.0 is NOT finished.
Firmware nor bada 2.0 SDK is ready for Release in near future...
so we must wait until september? 1 september?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe 31 September... then only first for big bada handsets or new incoming models...
Maybe I am wrong... maybe you have more luck...
But at this time I have not seen any 1.2 Firmware for light bada handsets...
Only Samsung knows why...
Best Regards
man samsung is poop becouse they focuse on android and all high performance phones!
BADA 2 is targeted at the US Market
BADA 1 and 1.2 were only dry runs even the samsung apps store was a dry run
so that every bug or unforeseen obstacle can be ironed out before they launch the American US store.
Remember that Samsung doenst have an American Apps store yet.
I think they knew that bada 1.2's stupid limitations like limited text, contacts
and apps menu would be show killers so they worked on BADA 2 before they
make their entry into America and battle with iOS, Android, WP7, WEbOS,
and RIM.
Its the reason why american developers werent interested in BADA since there is no american store in samsung apps.
BUT now that samsung is going to launch a midend BADA2 phone with NFC in America with a HI END Bada phone to follow, there are going to be interesting changes at Samsung.
So when they did announce that BADA 2 will go to all their devices,
the hi ends will have it first with the mid ends getting it much much later.
All this will happen starting with the American BADA nfc phone launch.
I saw in youtube bada 2.0 in a phone.that person said that finally bada 2.0 is here
Sent from my HTC Desire S using XDA Premium App
can you give me the link of the video?
Remember that Samsung doenst have an American Apps store yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Samsung produced hundrets of Qualcomm BREW handsets for US market... since many years.
So bada App Store is not mandatory...
Remember... european users missing since 2006 (2001) BREW apps in Europe for there BREW handsets...
bada is NOT for US market as main target...
I have no idea, if maybe Qualcomm were not interested in support bada store...
remember S8500/S8530 is Qualcomm based...
Then Apple...
In theory could US BREW Developer also develop for bada store for european users...
C++
Anyway. For me it is FIRST Store in 2010 for my S8500.
All my BREW handsets from 2006 are unsupported... no BREW Apps.
Best Regards
gamemaster98 said:
can you give me the link of the video?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It s in ita
here http://www.youtube.com/user/HDblog?blend=1&ob=5#p/u/10/Ahh7bayYTEI
Sent from my HTC Desire S using XDA Premium App
Actually its ARM based
Qualcomm is owned by Samsung but is a separate company from the Mobile Division. Its also just one of the ARM licensees and qualcomm has its own snapdragon chipset using the adreno gpu.
This is why the hummingbird used in the Galaxy S/ Wave 8500/8530 is designed by Samsung and not Qualcomm itself.
Same case for the exynos chipset in the Galaxy S2 which uses a mali400 gpu.
Designed by samsung but not by qualcomm.
This is also why Samsung's mobile division also uses the Tegra chipset etc
Samsung's mobile division doesnt have to use qualcomm exclusively since they are a separate company and Qualcomm has to submit bids just like other suppliers if they wish to get the mobile division's business.
Its the way Samsung has run its companies for years already to stimulate
competition between its subsidiaries.
Still all the chipsets in it's mobiles like tablets and cellphones are all based on ARM.
Samsung is going to push BADA on the American market if not late this year,
its going to be early next year.
The wave 725 with NFC and Bada 2 is its midend phone for the american market.
These two links below even try to gauge how BADA will fare in the somewhat crowded American Market.
Asides from these two links below other sites have mentioned that the wave 725
will be launched in America simultaneously with other countries.
http://techcrunch.com/2011/07/11/samsung-wave-725-specs-trickle-out-bada-2-0-on-board/
http://www.phonesreview.co.uk/2011/07/12/bada-2-0-samsung-wave-725-details-revealed/
Another link BADA going to USA
http://www.mobi-review.com/mobile-reviews/leak-samsung-wave-725-bada-20-coming-september.html
quote:
Bada may not be that significant in America, although it has completed surprisingly well for itself in Europe, and it might be attention-grabbing to see how the American market will receive the OS, especially for the explanation that US smartphone market is presently dominated by Android and iOS, although that may change with Bada 2.0 OS, or at least that’s what Samsung hopes.
unquote
look at this https://www.facebook.com/pages/BADA-OS-FORUM/134602219952258
''Guys using wave 525 , 533 don't need to worry about release of bada 2.0.1 for these mobiles because we will be able to port the Bada 2.0.1 firmware of Wave 578 in the old devices ... we hope Bada 2.0.1 for Wave 578 will release soon ..and we will provide u with all the download links and files ..''
i know this is not an official bada facebook page but this was made by inside developers!
And no further info since...

Ubuntu for smartphone!!! Could this be ported to Note II ?

http://www.androidpolice.com/2013/0...on-of-its-os-just-for-your-pocket-superphone/
It seems they are going to release images for Galaxy nexus. lets hope this can be ported soon to Note II when they release it.
Press Release:
Ubuntu comes to the phone, with a beautifully distilled interface and a unique full PC capability when docked
· Leading open PC platform with huge global following announces mobile version for network operators, OEMs and silicon vendors
· Fast, beautiful interface for entry level smartphones
· Unique PC experience on superphones when docked with a monitor, keyboard and mouse
· Ubuntu raises the bar for mobile UI design, for richer and more immersive apps
· A single OS for phone, PC and TV
London, UK, 2 January, 2013: Canonical today announced a distinctive smartphone interface for its popular operating system, Ubuntu, using all four edges of the screen for a more immersive experience. Ubuntu uniquely gives handset OEMs and mobile operators the ability to converge phone, PC and thin client into a single enterprise superphone.
"We expect Ubuntu to be popular in the enterprise market, enabling customers to provision a single secure device for all PC, thin client and phone functions. Ubuntu is already the most widely used Linux enterprise desktop, with customers in a wide range of sectors focused on security, cost and manageability" said Jane Silber, CEO of Canonical. "We also see an opportunity in basic smartphones that are used for the phone, SMS, web and email, where Ubuntu outperforms thanks to its native core apps and stylish presentation."
Ubuntu is aimed at two core mobile segments: the high-end superphone, and the entry-level basic smartphone, helping operators grow the use of data amongst consumers who typically use only the phone and messaging but who might embrace the use of web and email on their phone. Ubuntu also appeals to aspirational prosumers who want a fresh experience with faster, richer performance on a lower bill-of-materials device.
The handset interface for Ubuntu introduces distinctive new user experiences to the mobile market, including:
1. Edge magic: thumb gestures from all four edges of the screen enable users to find content and switch between apps faster than other phones.
1. Deep content immersion - controls appear only when the user wants them.
2. A beautiful global search for apps, content and products.
3. Voice and text commands in any application for faster access to rich capabilities.
4. Both native and web or HTML5 apps.
5. Evolving personalised art on the welcome screen.
Ubuntu offers compelling customisation options for partner apps, content and services. Operators and OEMs can easily add their own branded offerings. Canonical's personal cloud service, Ubuntu One, provides storage and media services, file sharing and a secure transaction service which enables partners to integrate their own service offerings easily.
Canonical makes it easy to build phones with Ubuntu. The company provides engineering services to offload the complexity of maintaining multiple code bases which has proven to be a common issue for smartphone manufacturers, freeing the manufacturer to focus on hardware design and integration. For silicon vendors, Ubuntu is compatible with a typical Android Board Support Package (BSP). This means Ubuntu is ready to run on the most cost-efficient chipset designs.
In bringing Ubuntu to the phone, Canonical is uniquely placed with a single operating system for client, server and cloud, and a unified family of interfaces for the phone, the PC and the TV. "We are defining a new era of convergence in technology, with one unified operating system that underpins cloud computing, data centers, PCs and consumer electronics" says Mark Shuttleworth, founder of Ubuntu and VP Products at Canonical.
Canonical currently serves the leading PC OEMs: ASUS, Dell, HP, and Lenovo all certify the majority of their PCs on Ubuntu and pre-install it in global markets. Over 20 million desktop PCs run the OS today, and Canonical estimates that close to 10% of the world's new desktops and laptops will ship with Ubuntu in 2014. Ubuntu is also wildly popular as a server platform, the number one server OS on the key major public clouds and the leading host OS for OpenStack, the open source IAAS
Just saw this too and at the end of their 20 minute video they said that it would run with the android kernel and drivers meaning it shouldn't be hard at all to port to our current device!
This summer I saw an XDA video of a galaxy s 2 running Ubuntu for Android. It shared the same kernel and worked together with android. As soon as you connected the phone to the dock it turned into an Ubuntu os desktop pc. This is what I'm interested in. I'm not interested in using Ubuntu as my phone os. Is this what is being released by canonical? Because from the videos I saw today it seems its a new operating system.
Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk 2
this is a brand new OS and i really hope we can get it on the note 2 since its the top of the line phone
slekkas said:
This summer I saw an XDA video of a galaxy s 2 running Ubuntu for Android. It shared the same kernel and worked together with android. As soon as you connected the phone to the dock it turned into an Ubuntu os desktop pc. This is what I'm interested in. I'm not interested in using Ubuntu as my phone os. Is this what is being released by canonical? Because from the videos I saw today it seems its a new operating system.
Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That was only ever available to OEM's, and I'm fairly sure none of them took it up. That's probably why Canonical have taken this route instead.
jellydroid13 said:
Just saw this too and at the end of their 20 minute video they said that it would run with the android kernel and drivers meaning it shouldn't be hard at all to port to our current device!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats the reason why i am so excited. Happy times ahead!!
Actuality there will be a phone released at the end of the year that uses Ubunta as an operating system. The Android Ubunta when docked system is a first step. Ubuntu will compete with all the existing phone operating systems within the next 12 months.
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda premium
It looks good in theory. As a long time Ubuntu pc user this is something exciting for me but the are few issues having this on note 2 even in the future. I am sure it will have note port down the line. But the os is heavily gesture based. And most gestures are designed to work from edges of the screen. For big device like note 2 this rules out seamless one hand passion for doing even basic things which you can still do on Android with Samsung customisations.
I understand appeal in gesture based OS, but in real world day to day use, point and click approach is most of the times faster.
But o would still like to try it out.
From my Note 2, in your face.
I had Ubuntu on my N2 with Linux Installer. Just C**p.
Edit: Damn... I just watched the Keynote. Looks pretty amazing
Pozdrav
Croatia1
With something as close to perfect as the note 2 + a few tweaks, why would anyone consider using a new mobile Os?
For the hundreds of dollars in apps I would lose, it would take the most amazing mobile os to convince me to change and right now Android does it all for me.
Sent from my Galaxy Note 2 using Tapatalk 2
The only thing that worries me is applications. If ubuntu is able to use apps for Android it world be great. But I doubt it will have access to play store.
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda app-developers app
But if it's using Android Drivers and Kernel, would it not be possible to tweak it to allow compatibility for Android Apps? Or at the very least the possibility to dual-boot it with a Siyah (or similar) kernel, so you get the best of both worlds, who knows perhaps they will even work out some sort of deal with Google to use the Play store by the time the first Ubuntu devices hit the market
Great clip of it in action
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LoXpLUr5WB4
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda app-developers app
God, that just looks so sleek!
Man I cannot wait! Please post if you know of a way to get the ball rolling on this.
Yeah i know how to get the ball rolling....first you need a flashable image, and since that hasnt been released yet....good luck with that
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda premium
speedyjay said:
Yeah i know how to get the ball rolling....first you need a flashable image, and since that hasnt been released yet....good luck with that
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I think I'm going to break my F5 key....
Therev86 said:
But if it's using Android Drivers and Kernel, would it not be possible to tweak it to allow compatibility for Android Apps? Or at the very least the possibility to dual-boot it with a Siyah (or similar) kernel, so you get the best of both worlds, who knows perhaps they will even work out some sort of deal with Google to use the Play store by the time the first Ubuntu devices hit the market
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think it would be in googles interest to give a competing OS a helping hand.
baileyjr said:
I don't think it would be in googles interest to give a competing OS a helping hand.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Next you know, Googlux is the biggest player around
Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk 2
Ubuntu for note2
there are a few devs working on this port... nothing other than the interface works right now... but there's steady progress... so expect it in a month or so...

Categories

Resources