Develop Bugs

Low quadrant score?

I have the leaked ota update from a few weeks ago and the newest radio, when I run quadrant I get a score of 850 or so, I've heard of people getting scores near 1400 on a droid incredible and I was wondering what I could do to increase my phone performance and increase my quadrant score.

neurostu said:
I have the leaked ota update from a few weeks ago and the newest radio, when I run quadrant I get a score of 850 or so, I've heard of people getting scores near 1400 on a droid incredible and I was wondering what I could do to increase my phone performance and increase my quadrant score.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Flash a KingxKlick Kernel the best one i think is the new BFS #1

RYANIMOSITY said:
Flash a KingxKlick Kernel the best one i think is the new BFS #1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I;m using the BFS Kernel at 1.113GHZ and got a score of 1580 with the governor set at performance. When it's on conservative, I get around 1350 to 1450 when it feels like giving me the performance. The conservative governor isn't meant for performance but it's still a good score when it's trying to save some battery.

Low?
Grab KINgxKernel BFS #1 and Set Cpu. You can OC the Kernel to 1.19 but 1.15 is stable. Was able to reach 1669 in Quadrant with this Kernel.

when you are running those kernels do you really notice a performance increase, or just an improved quadrant score?
also how do these kernels affect battery life

I'm using kings 3 kernel and get about 20 hours out of the battery. Definitely notice and increase. I don't OC and am just using the stock kernel settings.
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App

I'm using kings #3 and am at 30% remaining and 26 hrs unplugged. Definitely worth the try

great thanks, I'll check out those kernels.
Also would a kernel update like this allow for a 802.11n wifi connection?

hmm.... I just installed the #3 kernel and my quadrant score is still sitting around 780, maybe i'm misunderstanding something.

I have the BFS #1 kernel and the offical OTA leak installed, OC'd to 1.113 and set to performance. I was able to get 1408, highest i've ever gotten.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

does the #1 kernel see the same battery life increases as #3?

Love the BFS #1 with SKyRaider 3.0 RC2!

neurostu said:
hmm.... I just installed the #3 kernel and my quadrant score is still sitting around 780, maybe i'm misunderstanding something.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same here. Running sr 2.5.2, and king 3 set to 1.19 performance, I've turned off sync and killed all running apps but still can't get over 1080 on quadrant. Are theses Higher scores from a fresh install with no market apps installed?

I loaded the leaked rom and run about 1160.
Nobody says as to change the kernal or oc......

I get a little over 1100 on quadrant but im running genocide .4 I've seen people tuning genocide with over 1700 I don't get it.

arcangel1000 said:
I get a little over 1100 on quadrant but im running genocide .4 I've seen people tuning genocide with over 1700 I don't get it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't worry about it, I've been told Quadrant scores are pointless.

I Am Marino said:
Don't worry about it, I've been told Quadrant scores are pointless.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
QFT. My current setup of Incredikernel + MIUI 1.3.5 can get Quadrants in the 1500 range, but It doesn't seem any better than when I used to get 900's. Find a ROM you like, a kernel that has decent battery life, and smile, you'll have it as good as it gets!

***Official AnTuTu Benchmark Thread***

Post up your AnTuTu Benchmark scores! Please only post up screenshots for verification purposes.
Thanks to you zedomax! I am running just his kernel, without a custom ROM on top, and I love this thing. It is rock stable at 1.6GHz.
Correct me if I am wrong, but this sure looks like, at least for now, I am the highest score on AnTuTu with an E4GT. Am I right?

I just got a 7326 on Chris's latest exp. Kernel at 1.6 and i don't know how to take a screen shot lol.
Samsung Galaxy S II

pwnt
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Stock kernel FTW

^Holy crap! How did you get up to 1696Mhz?
viperROM (LoStKernel Exp) with 1.6Ghz OC & GPU OC.
Just imagine if we could get the 60fps cap off our phones

I guess that's what I get for trying, but I did say to limit this to E4GT only, so the SGS2 with the 7700+ doesn't count.
I will also state I ran mine exactly the same way I run it every day, with widgets running and such. SO I will go back and tweak what I can and see what I get. At the time, though, I thought it was cool.

ahl395 said:
^Holy crap! How did you get up to 1696Mhz?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stock kernel, tegrak app, stable
Sid 6.7 said:
I guess that's what I get for trying, but I did say to limit this to E4GT only, so the SGS2 with the 7700+ doesn't count.
I will also state I ran mine exactly the same way I run it every day, with widgets running and such. SO I will go back and tweak what I can and see what I get. At the time, though, I thought it was cool.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine is an E4GT.

R1ptide said:
Stock kernel, tegrak app, stable
Mine is an E4GT.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pardon me, I misread.
So how about some advice and pointers? Your RAM is one thing that is killing me, and if I were able to get 1650-1700MHz I figure the CPU figures will help themselves. My read/write is dead on with yours. So what do I do to get to those speeds and that much free RAM? I am running Tegrak as well. And other than the zedomax kernel and root, everything else is stock.

Sid 6.7 said:
Pardon me, I misread.
So how about some advice and pointers? Your RAM is one thing that is killing me, and if I were able to get 1650-1700MHz I figure the CPU figures will help themselves. My read/write is dead on with yours. So what do I do to get to those speeds and that much free RAM? I am running Tegrak as well. And other than the zedomax kernel and root, everything else is stock.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't trust any kernel that isn't based off of stock pulled at this point. I have social hub, media hub, and all the drm apps frozen. I think I have the odexed nociq mod but that might've gone away when I had to revert to a nandroid backup not sure. Don't use a live wallpaper.. That's about all I can think of really. Every phone is different so we could have the exact same setup and get different scores.

stangdriverdoug said:
I just got a 7326 on Chris's latest exp. Kernel at 1.6 and i don't know how to take a screen shot lol.
Samsung Galaxy S II
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you serious?
If you are press home and power at the same time
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium

I got this
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA App

This is the best I can do...
Samsung Galaxy S II

Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA App

Not to bad!
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium

trying to break 7800

How do ya get your ram so high? Does launchers slow the phones down? I'm running the lostkernel

lse4 said:
How do ya get your ram so high? Does launchers slow the phones down? I'm running the lostkernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I use the stock kernel and stock launcher so I don't know really

Jeez, I can't much higher than 5900 at 1600min/max mhz, performance gov, calk rom, lost kernal.. it looks like my CPU float-point and integer are crap compared to you guys

JoeBruin32 said:
Jeez, I can't much higher than 5900 at 1600min/max mhz, performance gov, calk rom, lost kernal.. it looks like my CPU float-point and integer are crap compared to you guys
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got the same setup... 1.6GHz max, performance gov, calkulin's rom, lost kernel 1.0.0.8. got similar score in 5900 range. then I flashed zedomax 6.02, same story... something in calkulin's rom isnt liking our overclocking.

try the pulled kernel and tegrak

R1ptide said:
try the pulled kernel and tegrak
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you recommending chris' stock pulled repacked with cwm, or his eg30plus?
edit: not even breaking 5400 on stock + tegrak @ 1.452

Galaxy nexus CPU clock speeds 1.65Ghz!

just wondering what you guys are getting for clock speeds on your galaxy nexus, im successfully running 1.65 Ghz using franco's #18.2, stable and random reboot free, i would love to hear yours

What are your uv settings?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

Weird I'm having trouble uploading from my app. But its 1450 mV for 1.65 and 1.6 1400 mV for 1500. i haven't done any undervolting yet, i dont want to mess with the stability, mainly because im happy my phone even runs on 1.65.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App

"Today, we put to rest our dear friend, Battery. He will be missed, even though he was rarely there when we needed him most."
*Shovels dirt into the grave*

I myself not so concern about battery life loss from CPU OC as long as the screen is still consuming 50% of it everyday...

meh, i have a extended battery, get decent battery life and have an extra, so im not worried. and its not like im at a constant 1.6, im happy with it so far gonna use it for a few days and see how it goes

who cares about battery life when you have a massive e-peens!

Literally just got into rooting and theming with my first android (gnex). Rooted and installed aokp b25 with nova launcher and loving it!
Is there noob guide to over clocking? Or a go to app or anything?
Maybe a tutorial? lol

Google can be your best friend. thats how i did it

s2d4 said:
you have a massive e-peens!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Guilty as charged.

s2d4 said:
who cares about battery life when you have a massive e-peens!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But....Quadrants must rule!
To the person who said they don't care when the screen takes 50%....
That makes no sense on why not to care about battery loss from overclocking.
Less == less, no matter what is draining it.

Dylerium said:
Google can be your best friend. thats how i did it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats how I rooted my phone and installed my rom. All googling, literally had no idea how to root or install a rom. Didn't even know any of the terminology.
Overclocking seems to be a bit more risky. I've tried googling a tutorial/beginners guide would be amazing.
What kernel are you guys using and where can I find it?

im using franco's #18.2 kernel you can find it in the cdma developer section

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App

Does anyone find it amusing his CPU score is lower than a stock Galaxy Nexus and instead his i/o score is inflated?

adrynalyne said:
Does anyone find it amusing his CPU score is lower than a stock Galaxy Nexus and instead his i/o score is inflated?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
generous use of of loading quadrant into ramdisk?

i noticed this too, i was gonna ask but i figured since all phones are different, it didnt really matter, but who the hell am i to say, your the expert...

I don't play the benchmark game, but ignoring your i/o score, your CPU score which an overclock would address is lower than stock 1.2ghz.

s2d4 said:
generous use of of loading quadrant intobramdisk?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wtf is bramdisk?... i honestly dont know why my phones like that, i just dl'd and benched... i have a feeling i might have to upload a video for you guys... hahah

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App

[CDMA] Any ROMs with 4,000+ quadrant scores?

I've always gotten lower scores (barely 2000, sometimes a little more than 3000) and was wondering if I was going crazy or this is normal. I've tried so many rom/kernel combinations but no luck.
I'm on AOKP and I'm getting 2068 and lower.
Comes from the Epic and the GS2, I was kinda expecting a lot more.
Sent from the future.

SocialReject said:
I've always gotten lower scores (barely 2000, sometimes a little more than 3000) and was wondering if I was going crazy or this is normal. I've tried so many rom/kernel combinations but no luck.
I'm on AOKP and I'm getting 2068 and lower.
Comes from the Epic and the GS2, I was kinda expecting a lot more.
Sent from the future.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The updated quadrant reports much lower for all devices. The GN isn't as much of a "benchmark queen" as the SGSII has potential to be. Unless your phone is reporting a score far under what Quadrant reports as typical, don't worry about it.
I'm benchmark app free

There are a few posts around with people showing around 4000 on quadrant i think. Dont know which roms though. Search the benchmark thread.

ive found the BEST stability and over all best scores without over clocking with the official cyanogenmod 9 nightly i get 3000+ with that... but like the dude before said quadrant scores are all hype... just use a rom with good speed that works best for u.

I don't always choose a ROM based on 1 stat...
but when I do, its for Quadrant.

Quadrant doesn't really translate to real world use.. why do people obsess over quadrant scores so much? If the phone runs well it runs well I don't need third party software to tell me if my phone is running fine.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium

My best is ~3700 using AOKP B25 & Imoseyons 3.0.20 kernel. Undervolted, stock clocked and using Ondemand.

Never even used quadrant...
#Likeaboss B-)
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App

user experience > quadrant score
idc about quadrant, i just want a clean phone w/o bloatware with lot of resources and support

I owned a Sprint SGS2 and while quadrant scores were in the 3000's consistently and the GN is in the 2000's I cannot tell the difference in speed between the 2 of them.
Now with quad cores, they will even score higher but how much smoother can a device run then smooth as butter?
If you don't think your phone runs smooth, then try AOKP and turn your swag on. Let's see if the iPhone 4s can do that sh.t!

I get around 3200-3300 give or take a hundred running AOKP build #26 + franco.Kernel 18.6 oc'ed to 1350mHz (minimum 700mHz) and using conservative governor. The UV has been left as it came with the kernel or whatever.
I have to add that I just got this phone a couple of days ago, and I am totally and utterly giving this the title of best phone I have ever had. I can't believe the person I got this off of actually switched to an iPhone because of battery issues xD

Aokp build 25
franco.kernel @ 1.65ghz (the new releases don't go this high because it's unstable for some)
interactive governer
Close:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

benchmarked ROMS: stock GB v. leaked ICS v. CM9 v. CM9+HO!NO! kernel

I wanted to see how each current rom stacks up in a comparison, all roms were installed fresh- data wiped and all. i could not get the test to run with the HO!NO! kernel at full clock, even though my phone handles everything else fine at full clock.
each test was run 2x on each rom.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

were you using antutu? this is what i got with it. All i did was kill all processes. running nightly from 6.11 and also using HO!NO! (thank you) v2 OC to 1.84Ghz

Hmm.. LG's ICS looks very promising for future custom ROMs/Kernals. Nice comparison.

yes, antutu. i think it's OK, benchmarks are what they are but I figure it should provide a generally good comparison. the only app installed on each rom was antutu and for cm9, gapps 3/17.

osmosizzz said:
were you using antutu? this is what i got with it. All i did was kill all processes. running nightly from 6.11 and also using HO!NO! (thank you) v2 OC to 1.84Ghz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this comparison is not a speedy demon test, i've done that and posted that previously, I can achieve those results you posted with the stock gb killing processes and much more to get the phone in drag strip mode.
this is simply an attempt to compare ROMS on a generally = footing.

updated

dangit Os, now you've got me curious how this cm9/HO!NO! can perform but i'm maxed at 1782 mHz! i'd bet this phone could tap 8000 fully set to race

scott0 said:
dangit Os, now you've got me curious how this cm9/HO!NO! can perform but i'm maxed at 1782 mHz! i'd bet this phone could tap 8000 fully set to race
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The speed is very promising hands down. you cant go any higher than that speed? i know that every processor has its own share of DNA, but i would assume most would stop at 1.8

osmosizzz said:
The speed is very promising hands down. you cant go any higher than that speed? i know that every processor has its own share of DNA, but i would assume most would stop at 1.8
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
mine rebootw when i run antutu at that speed.

6.21 build?
Sent from my LG-P930 using XDA

even andasa's nitrogen rom should be added to the chart as he's back with a new nitro and an update !

I'm running stock Bell ROM and OC to 1836MHz with HO!NO! kernel & I get 7605 in Antutu without killing anything. So what's the point of running ICS?

noemtfj said:
I'm running stock Bell ROM and OC to 1836MHz with HO!NO! kernel & I get 7605 in Antutu without killing anything. So what's the point of running ICS?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1. Benchmarks are not everything. 2. ICS improvements mainly come from its ui hardware acceleration and if you used it you would see the point of running ics. Its significantly smoother than gb ever was and it manages memory better.

kalel90 said:
1. Benchmarks are not everything. 2. ICS improvements mainly come from its ui hardware acceleration and if you used it you would see the point of running ics. Its significantly smoother than gb ever was and it manages memory better.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Correct for smoother, I experienced ICS for 2 days b4 went back to GB. For memory, I don't know about it's management mechanism but I saw it used more memory.

funny that my nitro hd in stock2.3.5 scores 5647 total but get 1522 on gpu what is a lot.But i dont know why i get really bad I/O (430) i think its cuz the sd card is class 2 16 gb wich is slow.