Develop Bugs

2378 - Defy Quadrant Benchmark New High

This is not mine. At 1000Hz (52Vsel) I got only 2000.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

Which rom did you use?

Hi ABC Universal,
can you tell us how did you reach this score ???
The difference is so big...!!??
Looks like you're based on a chinese version as I see some chinese in the status bar.
Thx.

Really impressive!!!
How is it possible?
My stock rom eclair 2.21 with jit and deodex keep an highest value of 1550 on quadrant...
Sent from my MB525 using XDA App

1- A fake.
2- Sense Kernel or something similar.

tomeu0000 said:
1- A fake.
2- Sense Kernel or something similar.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agree
Sent from my MOTO Defy

It is genuine output from quadrant running on defy. But yes there is no miracle performance boost.
Actually it demonstrated a limitation of defy's (and many others') CPU and a problem of quadrant benchmark. There is a detailed Chinese article explaning it but I understand only a little. Essentially, with some settings in android 2.2 system, defy (and many others) will fail the H264 decoding test, but quadrant takes it as completed in mini second, and thus the exceptional high cpu mark.
It was originated by some low end Chinese android phones which surprised people with exceptional quadrant benchmark. It turned out they had these settings enabled by default (/system/build.prop):
media.stagefright.enable-player=true
media.stagefright.enable-meta=true
media.stagefright.enable-scan=true
media.stagefright.enable-http=true

So this simply means the guys over at Aurora need to update their software to read the fail and drop the score to where it should be in reference to high end phones.

Does it mean that the Nexus and Evo 2.2+ scores are also wrong for the same reason?

sandresimon said:
Does it mean that the Nexus and Evo 2.2+ scores are also wrong for the same reason?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
According to the discussions, these two models enabled the settings by default. But I don't have them to examine myself.

That's explains why you install the sense rom, you obtain amazing Quadrant scores...
But really? no better performance? i thing this processor can do more than now...

not fake, i can do that too http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=976015

I think people getting 2700+ from defy now with this hack

hohoho, i go to try this....
EDIT.: For me, 1750 1Ghz 57vel

I've got 1231 @ 1000 mhz/53 vsel and 1303 @ 1100 mhz/55 vsel.

What benchmark app is this?

Whooooaaa!!! I don't believe it....!! Look awesome!
Down the line if the Defy can stay at average/consistant score around 1300 to 1500 should be more than enough running the daily apps/games available in the market.
Hit it more will eventually fried the poor Defy... huhuhu..!

mine got [email protected] on cm7 beta6, so you don't need to "cheat" to get a score that high out of the defy

this is my best score:
2617 on my defy with cm7 beta 6, cpu set to 1200 mhz and 80 vsel
but I think that there is something wrong: I usually get about 2200 (1950 with 1000 mhz, 1700 with 800 mhz), but every 5-6 tests i get similar score

LeoD7K said:
What benchmark app is this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quadrant

My benchmark results LOWER than a Evo 2.2? WTF

A couple of week ago I did a benchmark test, it came back 944, well below an Evo 2.2. A couple of days ago I rooted my phone, still on stock SENSE rom and I ran the test again, these are my results,
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
How the hell is this possible? Lol. I'm below a Evo 2.2 yet, my Evo is on 2.2. Can someone explain?

Does your phone perform fine otherwise?
Benchmarks are for the kids but it does seem a little low
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App

The benchmarks don't mean anything, just gloating. If you overclock it you'll get better scores.

I hate benchmarks I think they are inaccurate, plus evos react different with every different rom you flash. If my evo is not sluggish then its fast. Maybe its time to try another rom. Find one that has all or most of the bloat ware taken out they seem to be faster.
Good luck.
sent from my !πf€©£€d Evo 4g using XDA APP

Like stated earlier, those scores really don't mean much. If it bugs you, and you want to see a higher score, make sure a bunch of stuff is not running in the background before you run the quadrant test.

Use osmonitor or seepu+ from the market to see if anything is using your cpu, you probably have an app that is hogging it. It's possible that's a sign of malware too since the exploit they use will eat up your resources.

I posted about this a few days ago and got similar answers. I can't make mine go higher than 1150 (using Koni's Elite Series II, MS79723's SBC #15 v7 kernel. Did it on a fresh restart).
I have no idea what they're basing these tests on, but it sure as hell isn't our Evos lol.
Fear not though. Our UI runs on CPU and not on the GPU, so unless you play video games your benchmark actually doesn't matter at all. One thing the Evo is known for apart from other, newer phones is we're still running the Adreno 200 GPU while others have newer chip sets.
If you want faster scores here's some tips:
Get SetCPU and overclock your processor
Use xHausx's suggestion about checking to make sure your processor isn't being used.
Get an AOSP rom (like MIUI, CM6 or CM7). Without Sense, the phone runs faster and it'll show.
Get a kernel that performs better. Best bet is Netarchy for Sense. I don't know the kernels from AOSP.
I'm sure there's a few speed hacks/scripts/mods you can find too, but unless your Evo is actually the Evo 3D and not our Evo, then your benchmarks are gonna come up short.

As long as it feels fast to you I wouldn't worry about it.

my benchmark is lower, but my phone is still super smooth and you wouldnt tell the difference from scrolling or using an app. opening an app takes a lil longer
@245mhz

My phone lags, especially playing games. I'm also using Launcher Pro Plus, does that have anything to do with it? How can I get rid of this Sprint bloatware?

titanium backup will uninstall bloatware, our you can flash a custom rom with no bloatware included

What performance did you expect running a gps on 1 bar?
top kill

My non overlocked EVO running Tiamat 3.1.3 and CM7 hits around 1400 in quadrant. I'm happy with that.

[Q] Over clocking? Kernel? P930 BENCHMARK?

I am looking for a great overlock for my lg nitro hd.... I know there is one that sets the CPU all the way up to 1.83 GHz but does anyone know the benchmark score of the updated processor...
On average stock the phone pulls around 2500... What is the highest you guys have gotten and how?
Thanks,
Dniz

2500? Which benchmark-prog? Seems a little low to me, if your using Antutu or CF-bench...
With (for example) the optimized kernel from HO!NO! http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1547505 you can bring speed (not just speed, its stable too) to your phone. Together with the V1b ROM the benchmark was getting from 5200 to 7500 in Antutu and in CF-bench up to 8400. Also the performance on daily usage is way better than on stock!
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

My score is 6494 running stock clock speed of 1512mhz.
I'm running CM9 Nightly 4/17.
Haven't tried overclocking yet, but that might help add some perspective.

budabellyx said:
My score is 6494 running stock clock speed of 1512mhz.
I'm running CM9 Nightly 4/17.
Haven't tried overclocking yet, but that might help add some perspective.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That sound pretty good too. Unfortunatly i cant try CM9, not working for LU6200.
I also experienced no more heat, i guess its because the kernel is also undervolted.
On stock it was like a oven under heavy usage, thought it was a broken phone. But since i have the new kernel even under heavy usage, no heat anymore.

That's my main reason for wanting a cm9 compatible kernel, the undervolting. While I was running honos rom was the only time my phone didn't get too hot during normal use.
Sent from my LG-P930 using XDA

Yeah I can't wait for a custom CM9 kernal come out.

Cromson said:
2500? Which benchmark-prog? Seems a little low to me, if your using Antutu or CF-bench...
With (for example) the optimized kernel from HO!NO! http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1547505 you can bring speed (not just speed, its stable too) to your phone. Together with the V1b ROM the benchmark was getting from 5200 to 7500 in Antutu and in CF-bench up to 8400. Also the performance on daily usage is way better than on stock!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
NICE!!!

Stock ROM HONO Kernal
dniz_tha_shiz said:
I am looking for a great overlock for my lg nitro hd.... I know there is one that sets the CPU all the way up to 1.83 GHz but does anyone know the benchmark score of the updated processor...
On average stock the phone pulls around 2500... What is the highest you guys have gotten and how?
Thanks,
Dniz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
8041 - HO!NO! ROM and Kernal @ 1836 MHz (stable but not as smooth operation as stock ROM, I found)
7730 - Stock Bell Optimus 4G LTE P930 ROM with HO!NO! Kernal overclocked to 1836 MHz works the best for me as far as daily operating speed.

benchmarked ROMS: stock GB v. leaked ICS v. CM9 v. CM9+HO!NO! kernel

I wanted to see how each current rom stacks up in a comparison, all roms were installed fresh- data wiped and all. i could not get the test to run with the HO!NO! kernel at full clock, even though my phone handles everything else fine at full clock.
each test was run 2x on each rom.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

were you using antutu? this is what i got with it. All i did was kill all processes. running nightly from 6.11 and also using HO!NO! (thank you) v2 OC to 1.84Ghz

Hmm.. LG's ICS looks very promising for future custom ROMs/Kernals. Nice comparison.

yes, antutu. i think it's OK, benchmarks are what they are but I figure it should provide a generally good comparison. the only app installed on each rom was antutu and for cm9, gapps 3/17.

osmosizzz said:
were you using antutu? this is what i got with it. All i did was kill all processes. running nightly from 6.11 and also using HO!NO! (thank you) v2 OC to 1.84Ghz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this comparison is not a speedy demon test, i've done that and posted that previously, I can achieve those results you posted with the stock gb killing processes and much more to get the phone in drag strip mode.
this is simply an attempt to compare ROMS on a generally = footing.

updated

dangit Os, now you've got me curious how this cm9/HO!NO! can perform but i'm maxed at 1782 mHz! i'd bet this phone could tap 8000 fully set to race

scott0 said:
dangit Os, now you've got me curious how this cm9/HO!NO! can perform but i'm maxed at 1782 mHz! i'd bet this phone could tap 8000 fully set to race
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The speed is very promising hands down. you cant go any higher than that speed? i know that every processor has its own share of DNA, but i would assume most would stop at 1.8

osmosizzz said:
The speed is very promising hands down. you cant go any higher than that speed? i know that every processor has its own share of DNA, but i would assume most would stop at 1.8
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
mine rebootw when i run antutu at that speed.

6.21 build?
Sent from my LG-P930 using XDA

even andasa's nitrogen rom should be added to the chart as he's back with a new nitro and an update !

I'm running stock Bell ROM and OC to 1836MHz with HO!NO! kernel & I get 7605 in Antutu without killing anything. So what's the point of running ICS?

noemtfj said:
I'm running stock Bell ROM and OC to 1836MHz with HO!NO! kernel & I get 7605 in Antutu without killing anything. So what's the point of running ICS?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1. Benchmarks are not everything. 2. ICS improvements mainly come from its ui hardware acceleration and if you used it you would see the point of running ics. Its significantly smoother than gb ever was and it manages memory better.

kalel90 said:
1. Benchmarks are not everything. 2. ICS improvements mainly come from its ui hardware acceleration and if you used it you would see the point of running ics. Its significantly smoother than gb ever was and it manages memory better.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Correct for smoother, I experienced ICS for 2 days b4 went back to GB. For memory, I don't know about it's management mechanism but I saw it used more memory.

funny that my nitro hd in stock2.3.5 scores 5647 total but get 1522 on gpu what is a lot.But i dont know why i get really bad I/O (430) i think its cuz the sd card is class 2 16 gb wich is slow.

Overclocking?

Considering how the S4 Pro in the Nexus 7 is actually just a downclocked version of the Snapdragon 600 I presume there is a decent amount of wiggle room for overclocking. Yes, these are probably the worse chips out of the binning process to have been condemned to live the rest of their lives as S4 Pros, but would hope all of these should easily be able to achieve the 1.7Ghz Snapdragon 600 specs. Maybe even some lucky owners could push theirs to and beyond what we see in the Galaxy S4 at 1.9Ghz.
Now I'm just speculating as my Nexus 7 isn't even here yet (still in shipping). I made this post to make some discussion on the matter. Like people who've already tried messing with clock speeds and voltages on theirs could share their findings here. Talk about what kernels permit what levels of tweaking. Or even GPU overclocking/governor tweaking etc...
So, discuss!

I've tried running it over 2.1 Ghz with no problems at all. I really just wanted to see what a benchmark could get up to. I didn't check the voltages were. I tried running it fairly hard and of seemed to do alright.

bmlarson said:
I've tried running it over 2.1 Ghz with no problems at all. I really just wanted to see what a benchmark could get up to. I didn't check the voltages were. I tried running it fairly hard and of seemed to do alright.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What's the score of the benchmark you got? Is it almost the same as S600 devices?

I was able to atget up to 8849 on quadrant. It is consistently above 8000 for me using CyanogenMod and an overclocked kernel at 2052 Mhz CPU and 487 MHz GPU. At 2052mhz it is at 1175mV.
Edit: I got a slightly better score again
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

bmlarson said:
I was able to atget up to 8849 on quadrant. It is consistently above 8000 for me using CyanogenMod and an overclocked kernel at 2052 Mhz CPU and 487 MHz GPU. At 2052mhz it is at 1175mV.
Edit: I got a slightly better score again
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It seems the the score of the benchmark are the same with Xperia Z stock with S4 Pro.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app

Running at 1728mhz for days now, GPU at 487, handles perfectly fine.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using XDA Premium HD app