This is not mine. At 1000Hz (52Vsel) I got only 2000.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Which rom did you use?
Hi ABC Universal,
can you tell us how did you reach this score ???
The difference is so big...!!??
Looks like you're based on a chinese version as I see some chinese in the status bar.
Thx.
Really impressive!!!
How is it possible?
My stock rom eclair 2.21 with jit and deodex keep an highest value of 1550 on quadrant...
Sent from my MB525 using XDA App
1- A fake.
2- Sense Kernel or something similar.
tomeu0000 said:
1- A fake.
2- Sense Kernel or something similar.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agree
Sent from my MOTO Defy
It is genuine output from quadrant running on defy. But yes there is no miracle performance boost.
Actually it demonstrated a limitation of defy's (and many others') CPU and a problem of quadrant benchmark. There is a detailed Chinese article explaning it but I understand only a little. Essentially, with some settings in android 2.2 system, defy (and many others) will fail the H264 decoding test, but quadrant takes it as completed in mini second, and thus the exceptional high cpu mark.
It was originated by some low end Chinese android phones which surprised people with exceptional quadrant benchmark. It turned out they had these settings enabled by default (/system/build.prop):
media.stagefright.enable-player=true
media.stagefright.enable-meta=true
media.stagefright.enable-scan=true
media.stagefright.enable-http=true
So this simply means the guys over at Aurora need to update their software to read the fail and drop the score to where it should be in reference to high end phones.
Does it mean that the Nexus and Evo 2.2+ scores are also wrong for the same reason?
sandresimon said:
Does it mean that the Nexus and Evo 2.2+ scores are also wrong for the same reason?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
According to the discussions, these two models enabled the settings by default. But I don't have them to examine myself.
That's explains why you install the sense rom, you obtain amazing Quadrant scores...
But really? no better performance? i thing this processor can do more than now...
not fake, i can do that too http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=976015
I think people getting 2700+ from defy now with this hack
hohoho, i go to try this....
EDIT.: For me, 1750 1Ghz 57vel
I've got 1231 @ 1000 mhz/53 vsel and 1303 @ 1100 mhz/55 vsel.
What benchmark app is this?
Whooooaaa!!! I don't believe it....!! Look awesome!
Down the line if the Defy can stay at average/consistant score around 1300 to 1500 should be more than enough running the daily apps/games available in the market.
Hit it more will eventually fried the poor Defy... huhuhu..!
mine got [email protected] on cm7 beta6, so you don't need to "cheat" to get a score that high out of the defy
this is my best score:
2617 on my defy with cm7 beta 6, cpu set to 1200 mhz and 80 vsel
but I think that there is something wrong: I usually get about 2200 (1950 with 1000 mhz, 1700 with 800 mhz), but every 5-6 tests i get similar score
LeoD7K said:
What benchmark app is this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quadrant
Related
Hi, I was wonder if you can show us how much is the best quadrant score for defy that ever anyone get that! (of course with ScreenShot of quadrant advanced and which rom u use and how much overclock you did)
sorry for my english
quadrant advanced doesnt support gb afaik (textures dont show), so you cant measure gb roms with that. but here are to pics of the standard edition (first [email protected], second [email protected]).
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
sent from my cm7 defy
CM7 at 1,2 Ghz on 62vsel = 2100 score in newest free quadrant from market
p.s. in second run 2547 wow
i get 2598 with default settings(ie no apps running)
on CM7, standard 1 GHz CPU speed, got a result of 2278. sorry can't show screenies :/
mine with cm7 [email protected]
@defyno1: what quadrant advanced version is that? 1.1.6? cuz that doesnt support gb, try quadrant standard 1.1.7!
zakoo2 said:
quadrant advanced doesnt support gb afaik (textures dont show), so you cant measure gb roms with that. but here are to pics of the standard edition (first [email protected], second [email protected]).
sent from my cm7 defy
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mate quadrant advanced does support GB I have it installed and the textures run fine.
Sent from my MB525 using XDA Premium App
All, here is mine Cm7 nightly boot179 @ 1200 vsel 60
Sent from my MB525
I get 2307 with cm7 without overclock. Max ferq: 800MHz
You can see
http://www.pic.iran-forum.ir/images/xt09mzh11o16ir67r1vd.jpeg
Sent from my MB525 using XDA App
3225 points in Quadrant Standard and 3396 points in Antutu. CM7 some nightly @ 1370MHz...
zakoo2 said:
@defyno1: what quadrant advanced version is that? 1.1.6? cuz that doesnt support gb, try quadrant standard 1.1.7!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
[email protected](4th try)
+or-the same score..
Do you overclock only to get higher values on Quadrant Score?
got a score of 3133 on MIUI 1.7.1
Hi. I think the limit is around 3300-3500.
1370 Mhz that's much . Is your phone stable with this setting ?
GOt 2400+ CM7 RC0 default setting. Not overclocked!
After I learn about the "SQL trick" I don't care for Quadrant results anymore
On WajkIUI 1.8.19 @1200 I got 2665
felipeap said:
After I learn about the "SQL trick" I don't care for Quadrant results anymore
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can u elaborate further.
Maybe MIUI has the SQL trick by default because their scores are so high?
Whats the highest score in CM?
Mine is 2.8k
I read about in some obscured forum. Tomorrow I will have access to the bookmark and i'll share the information. Most forums says just "SQL tweaks"... it's something about how the SQL reads data in the tables ... it screws the Quadrant SQL test and generates artificial results ...
I've always gotten lower scores (barely 2000, sometimes a little more than 3000) and was wondering if I was going crazy or this is normal. I've tried so many rom/kernel combinations but no luck.
I'm on AOKP and I'm getting 2068 and lower.
Comes from the Epic and the GS2, I was kinda expecting a lot more.
Sent from the future.
SocialReject said:
I've always gotten lower scores (barely 2000, sometimes a little more than 3000) and was wondering if I was going crazy or this is normal. I've tried so many rom/kernel combinations but no luck.
I'm on AOKP and I'm getting 2068 and lower.
Comes from the Epic and the GS2, I was kinda expecting a lot more.
Sent from the future.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The updated quadrant reports much lower for all devices. The GN isn't as much of a "benchmark queen" as the SGSII has potential to be. Unless your phone is reporting a score far under what Quadrant reports as typical, don't worry about it.
I'm benchmark app free
There are a few posts around with people showing around 4000 on quadrant i think. Dont know which roms though. Search the benchmark thread.
ive found the BEST stability and over all best scores without over clocking with the official cyanogenmod 9 nightly i get 3000+ with that... but like the dude before said quadrant scores are all hype... just use a rom with good speed that works best for u.
I don't always choose a ROM based on 1 stat...
but when I do, its for Quadrant.
Quadrant doesn't really translate to real world use.. why do people obsess over quadrant scores so much? If the phone runs well it runs well I don't need third party software to tell me if my phone is running fine.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
My best is ~3700 using AOKP B25 & Imoseyons 3.0.20 kernel. Undervolted, stock clocked and using Ondemand.
Never even used quadrant...
#Likeaboss B-)
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App
user experience > quadrant score
idc about quadrant, i just want a clean phone w/o bloatware with lot of resources and support
I owned a Sprint SGS2 and while quadrant scores were in the 3000's consistently and the GN is in the 2000's I cannot tell the difference in speed between the 2 of them.
Now with quad cores, they will even score higher but how much smoother can a device run then smooth as butter?
If you don't think your phone runs smooth, then try AOKP and turn your swag on. Let's see if the iPhone 4s can do that sh.t!
I get around 3200-3300 give or take a hundred running AOKP build #26 + franco.Kernel 18.6 oc'ed to 1350mHz (minimum 700mHz) and using conservative governor. The UV has been left as it came with the kernel or whatever.
I have to add that I just got this phone a couple of days ago, and I am totally and utterly giving this the title of best phone I have ever had. I can't believe the person I got this off of actually switched to an iPhone because of battery issues xD
Aokp build 25
franco.kernel @ 1.65ghz (the new releases don't go this high because it's unstable for some)
interactive governer
Close:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I am looking for a great overlock for my lg nitro hd.... I know there is one that sets the CPU all the way up to 1.83 GHz but does anyone know the benchmark score of the updated processor...
On average stock the phone pulls around 2500... What is the highest you guys have gotten and how?
Thanks,
Dniz
2500? Which benchmark-prog? Seems a little low to me, if your using Antutu or CF-bench...
With (for example) the optimized kernel from HO!NO! http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1547505 you can bring speed (not just speed, its stable too) to your phone. Together with the V1b ROM the benchmark was getting from 5200 to 7500 in Antutu and in CF-bench up to 8400. Also the performance on daily usage is way better than on stock!
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
My score is 6494 running stock clock speed of 1512mhz.
I'm running CM9 Nightly 4/17.
Haven't tried overclocking yet, but that might help add some perspective.
budabellyx said:
My score is 6494 running stock clock speed of 1512mhz.
I'm running CM9 Nightly 4/17.
Haven't tried overclocking yet, but that might help add some perspective.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That sound pretty good too. Unfortunatly i cant try CM9, not working for LU6200.
I also experienced no more heat, i guess its because the kernel is also undervolted.
On stock it was like a oven under heavy usage, thought it was a broken phone. But since i have the new kernel even under heavy usage, no heat anymore.
That's my main reason for wanting a cm9 compatible kernel, the undervolting. While I was running honos rom was the only time my phone didn't get too hot during normal use.
Sent from my LG-P930 using XDA
Yeah I can't wait for a custom CM9 kernal come out.
Cromson said:
2500? Which benchmark-prog? Seems a little low to me, if your using Antutu or CF-bench...
With (for example) the optimized kernel from HO!NO! http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1547505 you can bring speed (not just speed, its stable too) to your phone. Together with the V1b ROM the benchmark was getting from 5200 to 7500 in Antutu and in CF-bench up to 8400. Also the performance on daily usage is way better than on stock!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
NICE!!!
Stock ROM HONO Kernal
dniz_tha_shiz said:
I am looking for a great overlock for my lg nitro hd.... I know there is one that sets the CPU all the way up to 1.83 GHz but does anyone know the benchmark score of the updated processor...
On average stock the phone pulls around 2500... What is the highest you guys have gotten and how?
Thanks,
Dniz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
8041 - HO!NO! ROM and Kernal @ 1836 MHz (stable but not as smooth operation as stock ROM, I found)
7730 - Stock Bell Optimus 4G LTE P930 ROM with HO!NO! Kernal overclocked to 1836 MHz works the best for me as far as daily operating speed.
I dont mean to turn this into a 'post your score' thread but I have run Quadrant multiple times today and saw something that seemed odd. Yes the score is lower than Id like, and yeh I know the scores dont mean much... however it shows my CPU to be very low and my Memory super high.
For example, in the sample chart the HTC One X has a CPU around 2500 wheras mine is around 750. Mem for One X is about 600, mine is showing 2500. Just seems odd
None of the other S3 charts Ive seen how the memory higher than the cpu
FWIW Im running CM10 and do have a bunch of apps on here.
Thanks all
Are you OC'ed really high? Possibly a core is shutting down to prevent damage...
Not OCed at all :/
But also why would the memory be thru the roof. I mean its much higher (2x or 3x) higher than every other 'sample' device in the app
Scores don't really mean a whole lot... but post an Antutu score and your setup...
S3 from ATT
CM10 latest nightly (i believe around 12/10)
CWM recovery
None of the perf things changed. Also ran tests with wifi on, sync on, mobile on, was not plugged in but at 98% battery
Quandrant - 4500 avg (highest seen 4800)
Antutu - 9914
CPU: 3368
GPU: 3974
RAM: 1692
IO: 880
1512MHz (x2) [720x1280]
RoachForLife said:
S3 from ATT
CM10 latest nightly (i believe around 12/10)
CWM recovery
None of the perf things changed. Also ran tests with wifi on, sync on, mobile on, was not plugged in but at 98% battery
Quandrant - 4500 avg (highest seen 4800)
Antutu - 9914
CPU: 3368
GPU: 3974
RAM: 1692
IO: 880
1512MHz (x2) [720x1280]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't rely on quadrant, it's not very well built for multi-core devices.... That Antutu score is very good, my highest was about 9500 OC at 2106, but was a few months back... I don't see any issues... again, these are just numbers... The performance of your phone should be evident through use.
---------- Post added at 09:35 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:29 AM ----------
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Not sent from your phone...
quasimodem what the screenshot from today? looks like you beat your old record
RoachForLife said:
quasimodem what the screenshot from today? looks like you beat your old record
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea, it's today, and at 1512Mhz, so I'm sure I could pull higher...
Considering how the S4 Pro in the Nexus 7 is actually just a downclocked version of the Snapdragon 600 I presume there is a decent amount of wiggle room for overclocking. Yes, these are probably the worse chips out of the binning process to have been condemned to live the rest of their lives as S4 Pros, but would hope all of these should easily be able to achieve the 1.7Ghz Snapdragon 600 specs. Maybe even some lucky owners could push theirs to and beyond what we see in the Galaxy S4 at 1.9Ghz.
Now I'm just speculating as my Nexus 7 isn't even here yet (still in shipping). I made this post to make some discussion on the matter. Like people who've already tried messing with clock speeds and voltages on theirs could share their findings here. Talk about what kernels permit what levels of tweaking. Or even GPU overclocking/governor tweaking etc...
So, discuss!
I've tried running it over 2.1 Ghz with no problems at all. I really just wanted to see what a benchmark could get up to. I didn't check the voltages were. I tried running it fairly hard and of seemed to do alright.
bmlarson said:
I've tried running it over 2.1 Ghz with no problems at all. I really just wanted to see what a benchmark could get up to. I didn't check the voltages were. I tried running it fairly hard and of seemed to do alright.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What's the score of the benchmark you got? Is it almost the same as S600 devices?
I was able to atget up to 8849 on quadrant. It is consistently above 8000 for me using CyanogenMod and an overclocked kernel at 2052 Mhz CPU and 487 MHz GPU. At 2052mhz it is at 1175mV.
Edit: I got a slightly better score again
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
bmlarson said:
I was able to atget up to 8849 on quadrant. It is consistently above 8000 for me using CyanogenMod and an overclocked kernel at 2052 Mhz CPU and 487 MHz GPU. At 2052mhz it is at 1175mV.
Edit: I got a slightly better score again
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It seems the the score of the benchmark are the same with Xperia Z stock with S4 Pro.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Running at 1728mhz for days now, GPU at 487, handles perfectly fine.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using XDA Premium HD app