Develop Bugs

2378 - Defy Quadrant Benchmark New High

This is not mine. At 1000Hz (52Vsel) I got only 2000.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

Which rom did you use?

Hi ABC Universal,
can you tell us how did you reach this score ???
The difference is so big...!!??
Looks like you're based on a chinese version as I see some chinese in the status bar.
Thx.

Really impressive!!!
How is it possible?
My stock rom eclair 2.21 with jit and deodex keep an highest value of 1550 on quadrant...
Sent from my MB525 using XDA App

1- A fake.
2- Sense Kernel or something similar.

tomeu0000 said:
1- A fake.
2- Sense Kernel or something similar.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agree
Sent from my MOTO Defy

It is genuine output from quadrant running on defy. But yes there is no miracle performance boost.
Actually it demonstrated a limitation of defy's (and many others') CPU and a problem of quadrant benchmark. There is a detailed Chinese article explaning it but I understand only a little. Essentially, with some settings in android 2.2 system, defy (and many others) will fail the H264 decoding test, but quadrant takes it as completed in mini second, and thus the exceptional high cpu mark.
It was originated by some low end Chinese android phones which surprised people with exceptional quadrant benchmark. It turned out they had these settings enabled by default (/system/build.prop):
media.stagefright.enable-player=true
media.stagefright.enable-meta=true
media.stagefright.enable-scan=true
media.stagefright.enable-http=true

So this simply means the guys over at Aurora need to update their software to read the fail and drop the score to where it should be in reference to high end phones.

Does it mean that the Nexus and Evo 2.2+ scores are also wrong for the same reason?

sandresimon said:
Does it mean that the Nexus and Evo 2.2+ scores are also wrong for the same reason?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
According to the discussions, these two models enabled the settings by default. But I don't have them to examine myself.

That's explains why you install the sense rom, you obtain amazing Quadrant scores...
But really? no better performance? i thing this processor can do more than now...

not fake, i can do that too http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=976015

I think people getting 2700+ from defy now with this hack

hohoho, i go to try this....
EDIT.: For me, 1750 1Ghz 57vel

I've got 1231 @ 1000 mhz/53 vsel and 1303 @ 1100 mhz/55 vsel.

What benchmark app is this?

Whooooaaa!!! I don't believe it....!! Look awesome!
Down the line if the Defy can stay at average/consistant score around 1300 to 1500 should be more than enough running the daily apps/games available in the market.
Hit it more will eventually fried the poor Defy... huhuhu..!

mine got [email protected] on cm7 beta6, so you don't need to "cheat" to get a score that high out of the defy

this is my best score:
2617 on my defy with cm7 beta 6, cpu set to 1200 mhz and 80 vsel
but I think that there is something wrong: I usually get about 2200 (1950 with 1000 mhz, 1700 with 800 mhz), but every 5-6 tests i get similar score

LeoD7K said:
What benchmark app is this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quadrant

[CDMA] Any ROMs with 4,000+ quadrant scores?

I've always gotten lower scores (barely 2000, sometimes a little more than 3000) and was wondering if I was going crazy or this is normal. I've tried so many rom/kernel combinations but no luck.
I'm on AOKP and I'm getting 2068 and lower.
Comes from the Epic and the GS2, I was kinda expecting a lot more.
Sent from the future.

SocialReject said:
I've always gotten lower scores (barely 2000, sometimes a little more than 3000) and was wondering if I was going crazy or this is normal. I've tried so many rom/kernel combinations but no luck.
I'm on AOKP and I'm getting 2068 and lower.
Comes from the Epic and the GS2, I was kinda expecting a lot more.
Sent from the future.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The updated quadrant reports much lower for all devices. The GN isn't as much of a "benchmark queen" as the SGSII has potential to be. Unless your phone is reporting a score far under what Quadrant reports as typical, don't worry about it.
I'm benchmark app free

There are a few posts around with people showing around 4000 on quadrant i think. Dont know which roms though. Search the benchmark thread.

ive found the BEST stability and over all best scores without over clocking with the official cyanogenmod 9 nightly i get 3000+ with that... but like the dude before said quadrant scores are all hype... just use a rom with good speed that works best for u.

I don't always choose a ROM based on 1 stat...
but when I do, its for Quadrant.

Quadrant doesn't really translate to real world use.. why do people obsess over quadrant scores so much? If the phone runs well it runs well I don't need third party software to tell me if my phone is running fine.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium

My best is ~3700 using AOKP B25 & Imoseyons 3.0.20 kernel. Undervolted, stock clocked and using Ondemand.

Never even used quadrant...
#Likeaboss B-)
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App

user experience > quadrant score
idc about quadrant, i just want a clean phone w/o bloatware with lot of resources and support

I owned a Sprint SGS2 and while quadrant scores were in the 3000's consistently and the GN is in the 2000's I cannot tell the difference in speed between the 2 of them.
Now with quad cores, they will even score higher but how much smoother can a device run then smooth as butter?
If you don't think your phone runs smooth, then try AOKP and turn your swag on. Let's see if the iPhone 4s can do that sh.t!

I get around 3200-3300 give or take a hundred running AOKP build #26 + franco.Kernel 18.6 oc'ed to 1350mHz (minimum 700mHz) and using conservative governor. The UV has been left as it came with the kernel or whatever.
I have to add that I just got this phone a couple of days ago, and I am totally and utterly giving this the title of best phone I have ever had. I can't believe the person I got this off of actually switched to an iPhone because of battery issues xD

Aokp build 25
franco.kernel @ 1.65ghz (the new releases don't go this high because it's unstable for some)
interactive governer
Close:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

[Q] HTC reduced cpu frequency in update?

Hello, I heard that HTC reduced the processor frequency in "One X", due to the high temperature of tegra and battery lifetime (In update, maybe 1.29?). Is that true?
Sorry, but my english isn't good.

flowerman said:
Hello, I heard that HTC reduced the processor frequency in "One X", due to the high temperature of tegra and battery lifetime (In update, maybe 1.29?). Is that true?
Sorry, but my english isn't good.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My AnTuTu score went up so I'm guessing not.

flowerman said:
Hello, I heard that HTC reduced the processor frequency in "One X", due to the high temperature of tegra and battery lifetime (In update, maybe 1.29?). Is that true?
Sorry, but my english isn't good.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
not reduced just doesn't ramp up as often as before

Thank for answers
I didn't know that antutu shows the cpu frequency

hamdir said:
not reduced just doesn't ramp up as often as before
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did they change the CPU scaling governor?
I remember talk a little while back about On Demand and Interactive governors and which one was best

flowerman said:
Thank for answers
I didn't know that antutu shows the cpu frequency
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
antutu only shows what the max speed is and its only 1.5 on a single core, when on 4 cores you can only get 1.2 GHZ and 1.4 GHZ on 2 cores.
look at terga stats at bottom on screens
4 cores bench
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
2 cores bench

So reduced frequency it's true? Earlier (after updates) unless Tegra 3 had 1.3ghz on 4 cores ?

flowerman said:
So reduced frequency it's true? Earlier (after updates) unless Tegra 3 had 1.3ghz on 4 cores ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No It's always been like this, the update changes how the CPU speeds up and down e.g 50 MHz in idle to max speed, all its done is help the phone use the lowest possible speed to save battery.
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium

Overclocking?

Considering how the S4 Pro in the Nexus 7 is actually just a downclocked version of the Snapdragon 600 I presume there is a decent amount of wiggle room for overclocking. Yes, these are probably the worse chips out of the binning process to have been condemned to live the rest of their lives as S4 Pros, but would hope all of these should easily be able to achieve the 1.7Ghz Snapdragon 600 specs. Maybe even some lucky owners could push theirs to and beyond what we see in the Galaxy S4 at 1.9Ghz.
Now I'm just speculating as my Nexus 7 isn't even here yet (still in shipping). I made this post to make some discussion on the matter. Like people who've already tried messing with clock speeds and voltages on theirs could share their findings here. Talk about what kernels permit what levels of tweaking. Or even GPU overclocking/governor tweaking etc...
So, discuss!

I've tried running it over 2.1 Ghz with no problems at all. I really just wanted to see what a benchmark could get up to. I didn't check the voltages were. I tried running it fairly hard and of seemed to do alright.

bmlarson said:
I've tried running it over 2.1 Ghz with no problems at all. I really just wanted to see what a benchmark could get up to. I didn't check the voltages were. I tried running it fairly hard and of seemed to do alright.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What's the score of the benchmark you got? Is it almost the same as S600 devices?

I was able to atget up to 8849 on quadrant. It is consistently above 8000 for me using CyanogenMod and an overclocked kernel at 2052 Mhz CPU and 487 MHz GPU. At 2052mhz it is at 1175mV.
Edit: I got a slightly better score again
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

bmlarson said:
I was able to atget up to 8849 on quadrant. It is consistently above 8000 for me using CyanogenMod and an overclocked kernel at 2052 Mhz CPU and 487 MHz GPU. At 2052mhz it is at 1175mV.
Edit: I got a slightly better score again
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It seems the the score of the benchmark are the same with Xperia Z stock with S4 Pro.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app

Running at 1728mhz for days now, GPU at 487, handles perfectly fine.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using XDA Premium HD app

CPU speed for Snapdragon 808 1.44GHz?

So today got my replacement new G4. Dowloaded the CPU Z app and it shows my cpu at 1.44. But my benchmarks in antutu are fine.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my LG-H811 using Tapatalk

You got ripped off.
/troll
Or are you serious?

Can someone check theirs and see hat it says? I think i know whats going on. The two cores 4 and 5 are the 1.8GHz and 0-3 are the slower cores.
Sent from my LG-H811 using Tapatalk

coolmaster121 said:
Can someone check theirs and see hat it says? I think i know whats going on. The two cores 4 and 5 are the 1.8GHz and 0-3 are the slower cores.
Sent from my LG-H811 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/2725543

It's hard to catch 4 & 5 doing much of anything, so I launched a huge game that takes some time to load, switched back to CPU-Z, and snapped a quick screenshot. The apps just report the max CPU frequency incorrectly. They probably just need to be updated for the 808.

That's because you aren't doing anything....
Take your thumb and scroll up and down fast and you'll see it go up.

My thumb wasn't fast enough to get 4 & 5 above 1.4 GHz while taking a screenshot. Launching a big app was a lot easier. Obviously 4 & 5 do move some, but the concern was that they were capped at 1.4 GHz since all of the apps show that as the max CPU frequency.

It's the governor and cpu control that does this - it regulates speed for temperature and battery control by changing the value in sys file system, so cpu monitors that read that once and treat it static will always get a false value.

danaff37 said:
It's the governor and cpu control that does this - it regulates speed for temperature and battery control by changing the value in sys file system, so cpu monitors that read that once and treat it static will always get a false value.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's a smart answer right there
Sent from my LG-H815

Here are couple of screenshots showing the 2 high power cores 4&5 at their maximum speed of 1.82GHz. As well as their speed history.
I used System Tuner app from the Play Store. You don't need root to use the app to monitor system usage.