Develop Bugs

2378 - Defy Quadrant Benchmark New High

This is not mine. At 1000Hz (52Vsel) I got only 2000.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

Which rom did you use?

Hi ABC Universal,
can you tell us how did you reach this score ???
The difference is so big...!!??
Looks like you're based on a chinese version as I see some chinese in the status bar.
Thx.

Really impressive!!!
How is it possible?
My stock rom eclair 2.21 with jit and deodex keep an highest value of 1550 on quadrant...
Sent from my MB525 using XDA App

1- A fake.
2- Sense Kernel or something similar.

tomeu0000 said:
1- A fake.
2- Sense Kernel or something similar.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agree
Sent from my MOTO Defy

It is genuine output from quadrant running on defy. But yes there is no miracle performance boost.
Actually it demonstrated a limitation of defy's (and many others') CPU and a problem of quadrant benchmark. There is a detailed Chinese article explaning it but I understand only a little. Essentially, with some settings in android 2.2 system, defy (and many others) will fail the H264 decoding test, but quadrant takes it as completed in mini second, and thus the exceptional high cpu mark.
It was originated by some low end Chinese android phones which surprised people with exceptional quadrant benchmark. It turned out they had these settings enabled by default (/system/build.prop):
media.stagefright.enable-player=true
media.stagefright.enable-meta=true
media.stagefright.enable-scan=true
media.stagefright.enable-http=true

So this simply means the guys over at Aurora need to update their software to read the fail and drop the score to where it should be in reference to high end phones.

Does it mean that the Nexus and Evo 2.2+ scores are also wrong for the same reason?

sandresimon said:
Does it mean that the Nexus and Evo 2.2+ scores are also wrong for the same reason?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
According to the discussions, these two models enabled the settings by default. But I don't have them to examine myself.

That's explains why you install the sense rom, you obtain amazing Quadrant scores...
But really? no better performance? i thing this processor can do more than now...

not fake, i can do that too http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=976015

I think people getting 2700+ from defy now with this hack

hohoho, i go to try this....
EDIT.: For me, 1750 1Ghz 57vel

I've got 1231 @ 1000 mhz/53 vsel and 1303 @ 1100 mhz/55 vsel.

What benchmark app is this?

Whooooaaa!!! I don't believe it....!! Look awesome!
Down the line if the Defy can stay at average/consistant score around 1300 to 1500 should be more than enough running the daily apps/games available in the market.
Hit it more will eventually fried the poor Defy... huhuhu..!

mine got [email protected] on cm7 beta6, so you don't need to "cheat" to get a score that high out of the defy

this is my best score:
2617 on my defy with cm7 beta 6, cpu set to 1200 mhz and 80 vsel
but I think that there is something wrong: I usually get about 2200 (1950 with 1000 mhz, 1700 with 800 mhz), but every 5-6 tests i get similar score

LeoD7K said:
What benchmark app is this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quadrant

Quadrant Scores:

lets post scores and what we are running to get their to help compare the different options available now for our Droid Incredible 2's
1649 gingerbread (.3.) for another week or so

CM7 Nightly 2. Stock kernel, not overlocked:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

Cm7 overlocked to 1497
30 minutes or so later...and yes my crappy digital cameras clock is wrong

Cyanogen 1.8ghz

Underclocked and still better than stock. Runs great at 768mhz. No complaints.

Maximum overclock on stock CM7 kernel (~1.5ghz).

I did some tests with the CM7 Nightly 3. I got some amazing scores:
Stock cpu speed:
1.2GHz:
1.45GHz:
1.6GHz:
1.7 and 1.8GHz gave me lower scores than 1.6GHz, so I guess its safe to say 1.6Ghz is the max stable speed.

can't wait to hit cm7 and push it now !!!

Running miui at 1.49ghtz.
Sent from my Incredible 2 using XDA Premium App

Im running cm7 nightly 3 at 1.8 (and tested at 1.6) I am only around 2800 how are y'all getting up to 3500?
Sent from my Incredible 2 using XDA App

Interestingly, after some tweaking, messing around, and other stuff, I managed to score over 2200 at 768mhz. I'm getting some nice smooth performance out of it while underclocked, and getting it to do things quicker means it'll save that much more battery.

nimdae said:
Interestingly, after some tweaking, messing around, and other stuff, I managed to score over 2200 at 768mhz. I'm getting some nice smooth performance out of it while underclocked, and getting it to do things quicker means it'll save that much more battery.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What exactly did you tweak and mess around with? Cause that's sounds pretty nice.

melgibson666 said:
What exactly did you tweak and mess around with? Cause that's sounds pretty nice.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not really sure, to be honest. I was mostly tweaking personal preferences, then messing with governors on the CPU. While comparing governors, the number kept climbing until it broke 2200 then fell back to just under 2200. I double checked my CPU clock settings to make sure I was still at 768mhz. I haven't really done any further testing. I suspect part of it may be JIT optimizations, but I'm not sure.

nimdae said:
I'm not really sure, to be honest. I was mostly tweaking personal preferences, then messing with governors on the CPU. While comparing governors, the number kept climbing until it broke 2200 then fell back to just under 2200. I double checked my CPU clock settings to make sure I was still at 768mhz. I haven't really done any further testing. I suspect part of it may be JIT optimizations, but I'm not sure.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea I was messing around with the different govenors after reading your post and I noticed a big difference between the power saver and ONdemand. Power saver makes the transitions a little sluggish but I guess that's to be expected for what it's trying to do. lol All in all though the battery life on ondemand is leaps and bounds ahead of the stock ROM I'm running a 1.1ghz clock right now and it is like butter with battery life to boot.

Quad Standard
mine came in at 2924 thats awesome!

tragedy , mine is between 1250-1500

zozor said:
tragedy , mine is between 1250-1500
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What Rom
Sent from my Incredible 2 using XDA Premium App

zozor said:
tragedy , mine is between 1250-1500
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stock ROM? Mine wasn't even that low stock. Did you run it more than once?
Sent from my Incredible 2 using XDA App

am running this rom
[ROM] Offical Gingerbread 2.3.4 ROM is out via OTA by ChinaTelcom

zozor said:
am running this rom
[ROM] Offical Gingerbread 2.3.4 ROM is out via OTA by ChinaTelcom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Damn sorry bro I got a 2900 while on the phone lol
Sent from my Incredible 2 using XDA Premium App

Quadrant Updated for ICS

I know this doesn't mean much but since people use it a lot, I figured I'd post it up. Post here with results for bragging rights etc etc even though it means nothing but just for fun
What's New
What's in this version:
2.0 changes:
Support for multicore CPUs and ICS
GUI improvements
Polish translation
Fixed slow framerate on PowerVR SGX 540
Due to changes implemented to support new devices this version of Quadrant reports scores different from 1.x releases. The result browser will be restored in the next update, when new benchmark results are
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://market.android.com/details?id=com.aurorasoftworks.quadrant.ui.standard
---------
I'll start,
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Franco 16.2 / Build 23

zephiK said:
I know this doesn't mean much but since people use it a lot, I figured I'd post it up. Post here with results for bragging rights etc etc even though it means nothing but just for fun
https://market.android.com/details?id=com.aurorasoftworks.quadrant.ui.standard
---------
I'll start,
Franco 16.2 / Build 23
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So are you overclocking and if you are, to what? This information would be pretty useful when looking at scores.

[email protected] said:
So are you overclocking and if you are, to what? This information would be pretty useful when looking at scores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
700 MHz min 1.35GHz max francoGazelle.

I overclocked to 1.35 with FrancoKernel and my ROM is Apex: I reach a score of 3085

AOKP milestone 3 ROM, Trinity kernel overclocked @ 1350MHz/512MHz (CPU/GPU) and undervolted @ 1225mV. Score was 3609, but can't post a pic yet because I don't have enough posts, so here's a link: (just take out the spaces)
i175. photobucket. com/albums/w142/alienetic13/Screenshot_2012-02-13-13-49-59.png
Sent from my GSM Galaxy Nexus / xda premium

Says its not compatible with my device? What the hell...
Running aokp m3 with Franco kernel... anyone elder get this from market?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

craigcgomez 4.0.4, Franco 16.2 turtle 1350/400
3346

Still get 3169 from older version on aokp with Franco kernel
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

If you guys want to up your scores a bit, try this:
- Create a backup (however you backup your phone, CWM, etc.)
- Using Root Explorer, go to: system/lib/egl and delete the whole first line in egl.cfg (that ends with the word 'android') so that only the line under it with your GPU name is still there.
- Reboot.
- Run Quadrant again. Should get better FPS and a bit higher of a score.
Sent from my GSM Galaxy Nexus / xda premium

Can someone post some stock, not overclocked scores please.

Stock 4.0.1, unrooted, not overclocked GSM Nexus: 2160
I can't post links, but the score breakdown was practically identical to the Galaxy Nexus score in the results chart, except my 3D score was about 1/4 higher than theirs.

Gummy 0.7.6, 4.0.4 radios, leankernel 1.10.0, oc 1350, interactiveX.

trojan89 said:
Stock 4.0.1, unrooted, not overclocked GSM Nexus: 2160
I can't post links, but the score breakdown was practically identical to the Galaxy Nexus score in the results chart, except my 3D score was about 1/4 higher than theirs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was hoping that wasn't true, lol.
I know these benchmarks don't really mean much but it is still nice to see a higher score.

I'm using Liquid Rom Beta 4 and Franco.kernel 16.2, and when using CPU benchmarks, including on Quadrant, Antutu and Linpack, for some reason, it's horribly slow and gets really bad scores. My Quadrant score was in the one thousands because the CPU score alone dragged it down. I'm gonna try Leankernel, then if that doesn't work, I'll switch back to AOKP. Does anyone else know anything else about this?

Cyanogenmod 9 with morfics 1382 trinity any ramdisk kernel
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

4.0.4 running franko's newest release 700min-1350max

AOKP M3 + franco 17.2 1,5GHz & UV:

[CDMA] Any ROMs with 4,000+ quadrant scores?

I've always gotten lower scores (barely 2000, sometimes a little more than 3000) and was wondering if I was going crazy or this is normal. I've tried so many rom/kernel combinations but no luck.
I'm on AOKP and I'm getting 2068 and lower.
Comes from the Epic and the GS2, I was kinda expecting a lot more.
Sent from the future.

SocialReject said:
I've always gotten lower scores (barely 2000, sometimes a little more than 3000) and was wondering if I was going crazy or this is normal. I've tried so many rom/kernel combinations but no luck.
I'm on AOKP and I'm getting 2068 and lower.
Comes from the Epic and the GS2, I was kinda expecting a lot more.
Sent from the future.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The updated quadrant reports much lower for all devices. The GN isn't as much of a "benchmark queen" as the SGSII has potential to be. Unless your phone is reporting a score far under what Quadrant reports as typical, don't worry about it.
I'm benchmark app free

There are a few posts around with people showing around 4000 on quadrant i think. Dont know which roms though. Search the benchmark thread.

ive found the BEST stability and over all best scores without over clocking with the official cyanogenmod 9 nightly i get 3000+ with that... but like the dude before said quadrant scores are all hype... just use a rom with good speed that works best for u.

I don't always choose a ROM based on 1 stat...
but when I do, its for Quadrant.

Quadrant doesn't really translate to real world use.. why do people obsess over quadrant scores so much? If the phone runs well it runs well I don't need third party software to tell me if my phone is running fine.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium

My best is ~3700 using AOKP B25 & Imoseyons 3.0.20 kernel. Undervolted, stock clocked and using Ondemand.

Never even used quadrant...
#Likeaboss B-)
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App

user experience > quadrant score
idc about quadrant, i just want a clean phone w/o bloatware with lot of resources and support

I owned a Sprint SGS2 and while quadrant scores were in the 3000's consistently and the GN is in the 2000's I cannot tell the difference in speed between the 2 of them.
Now with quad cores, they will even score higher but how much smoother can a device run then smooth as butter?
If you don't think your phone runs smooth, then try AOKP and turn your swag on. Let's see if the iPhone 4s can do that sh.t!

I get around 3200-3300 give or take a hundred running AOKP build #26 + franco.Kernel 18.6 oc'ed to 1350mHz (minimum 700mHz) and using conservative governor. The UV has been left as it came with the kernel or whatever.
I have to add that I just got this phone a couple of days ago, and I am totally and utterly giving this the title of best phone I have ever had. I can't believe the person I got this off of actually switched to an iPhone because of battery issues xD

Aokp build 25
franco.kernel @ 1.65ghz (the new releases don't go this high because it's unstable for some)
interactive governer
Close:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

[Q] Over clocking? Kernel? P930 BENCHMARK?

I am looking for a great overlock for my lg nitro hd.... I know there is one that sets the CPU all the way up to 1.83 GHz but does anyone know the benchmark score of the updated processor...
On average stock the phone pulls around 2500... What is the highest you guys have gotten and how?
Thanks,
Dniz

2500? Which benchmark-prog? Seems a little low to me, if your using Antutu or CF-bench...
With (for example) the optimized kernel from HO!NO! http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1547505 you can bring speed (not just speed, its stable too) to your phone. Together with the V1b ROM the benchmark was getting from 5200 to 7500 in Antutu and in CF-bench up to 8400. Also the performance on daily usage is way better than on stock!
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

My score is 6494 running stock clock speed of 1512mhz.
I'm running CM9 Nightly 4/17.
Haven't tried overclocking yet, but that might help add some perspective.

budabellyx said:
My score is 6494 running stock clock speed of 1512mhz.
I'm running CM9 Nightly 4/17.
Haven't tried overclocking yet, but that might help add some perspective.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That sound pretty good too. Unfortunatly i cant try CM9, not working for LU6200.
I also experienced no more heat, i guess its because the kernel is also undervolted.
On stock it was like a oven under heavy usage, thought it was a broken phone. But since i have the new kernel even under heavy usage, no heat anymore.

That's my main reason for wanting a cm9 compatible kernel, the undervolting. While I was running honos rom was the only time my phone didn't get too hot during normal use.
Sent from my LG-P930 using XDA

Yeah I can't wait for a custom CM9 kernal come out.

Cromson said:
2500? Which benchmark-prog? Seems a little low to me, if your using Antutu or CF-bench...
With (for example) the optimized kernel from HO!NO! http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1547505 you can bring speed (not just speed, its stable too) to your phone. Together with the V1b ROM the benchmark was getting from 5200 to 7500 in Antutu and in CF-bench up to 8400. Also the performance on daily usage is way better than on stock!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
NICE!!!

Stock ROM HONO Kernal
dniz_tha_shiz said:
I am looking for a great overlock for my lg nitro hd.... I know there is one that sets the CPU all the way up to 1.83 GHz but does anyone know the benchmark score of the updated processor...
On average stock the phone pulls around 2500... What is the highest you guys have gotten and how?
Thanks,
Dniz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
8041 - HO!NO! ROM and Kernal @ 1836 MHz (stable but not as smooth operation as stock ROM, I found)
7730 - Stock Bell Optimus 4G LTE P930 ROM with HO!NO! Kernal overclocked to 1836 MHz works the best for me as far as daily operating speed.