Well in my opinion gingerbread is still not that stable and drains toooooo much battery.
And there are (I believe) still some Froyo users.
Is it possible or is there a port of TW4 to Froyo?
Thanks in advance.
Related
i feel my htc hd2 more responsible and sensible than my defy, is that possible??
is there any whay to increase screen sensivility?
Are you with froyo? I've seen eclair better than froyo in that...
Perilla_ said:
Are you with froyo? I've seen eclair better than froyo in that...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i'm in eclair, but stills not better than my HD2
Hiya,
Pretty amazing after a couple of days getting the 3.0 (ARHD) theres a 4.0 out! So heres a newbie question.
Whats better about the 2.3 gingerbread compared to the 2.2 froyo?
What could likely be better when it has been tweaked? If question has been answered already, my apologies.
Thanks for reading.
The question is simple, until HTC relases stable version of gigerbeard for dhd,is better to have modded Froyo Rom or one of latest gingerbeard Rom??
About performance and battery life what is the best choice?
Sent from future
I tought Google said that Gingerbread had a better interpretation of the battery thing so it should have a better battery life. Also they have a better task manager so you can 'kill' apps safely not damaging your phone.
So I think Gingerbread should be better in theory :>
In theory of the course but now?
Now I'm running rom based on desire s. It's wonderful but has echo problem!!! Damn!
Sent from future
As far as I understand, we do not have a "proper" Kernel for Gingerbread ROM until its leaked. So i guess at the moment, in the context of battery life, Froyo should be better.
can someone please help me understand the difference between these two? How does Sense 3.0 fit in with Gingerbread 2.3 or 2.4? Does it?
jminor4326 said:
can someone please help me understand the difference between these two? How does Sense 3.0 fit in with Gingerbread 2.3 or 2.4? Does it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To the best of my knowledge, Sense and Android versions are independent of each other. For our purposes, there is a very high likelyhood of getting a stock upgrade to Gingerbread on the EVO 4G (some say impending OTA very soon), but a low chance of us ever seeing Sense 3.0.
Pretty sure we won't see an official Sense 3.0 for our phones...but one can hope? Some of the 3.0 stuff looks awesome!
I don't think there is much difference between froyo and gingerbread. The froyo kernel still works on GB roms. I believe sense 3 is a GB based rom. 2.0- 2.1 are made in both varieties but it doesn't seem to add anything by being based on GB versus froyo.
Sense 3.0 seems to be suited for tablet also. There are minor changes to the way it works. The lock screen has shortcuts on it, cosmetic changes and I did notice the music player now can download cover art. Other than that I have not noticed any major enhancements. HTC hub is starting to work but gives me problems when using a different skin.
Hi friends,
I wonder what we will get with ICS. I think it will let us to have much more free ram at startup. Maybe smoother than virtuous affinity... So more what? I've read it would be more useful than sense based roms. I really can't wait to have an ICS rom which is really smooth; but i don't know why and for what i wait
Why would it give us more free RAM ? Surely it will be less, e.g. hardware acceleration uses more RAM.
Sent from my Desire Z running CM7.
steviewevie said:
Why would it give us more free RAM ? Surely it will be less, e.g. hardware acceleration uses more RAM.
Sent from my Desire Z running CM7.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
in my opinion, base android roms (no sense) don't use much ram. somebody said we will not need sense with ICS. So it won't use much ram. as i said, these are my opinions... BTW doesn't sense based roms have hardware acceleration? is there any ram usage difference between gingerbread and ICS roms?
ICS is the newest operating system for android, which is definately alot to look forward to (eg. gingerbread made froyo absolete). But you're comparing it to a sense rom, which is a completely different thing. I think the best way for you to learn what you want to know is to google it.
yes but icsi with sense is impossible in G2 because have poor ram for this dual
I have found this page http://chromloop.com/2011/11/ice-cream-sandwich-first-boot-on-motorola-defy-aosp/
It says ics uses about the same ram with gingerbread. So it should be possible to have ics rom with sense. But i don't think that i need it, i only want ics based cyanogen 9. Thus it will be fast i though. Am i wrong?
Sent from my HTC Vision using xda premium
Well you can play around with the ICS port that's still in the works. You'll get a general idea of new things to come. I can't wait till we have a nice, fully functional rom. Don't think I'd even want anything from sense after that
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA Premium
i've been playing with the ics port rom ever since the alpha version. so far it's the greatest. can't imagine (wait) what it will feel after a stable release
Have they implemented Hardware accelerated UI in the Desire S port?
It seems rather slow.
Of course it's in beta, so it's all cool and I don't expect a port to perform well in the long run either way. But I'm just curious since "3D acceleration" is kinda vague. Is it only for game apps and some fancy effects?
As far as I know hardware acceleration is fully working on the desire s port. I'm pretty sure, that most performance issues are simply due to the fact that it is a beta port of ics from another device.
Once we have a fully working aosp build or cm9, performance should be as good as expected.
I think you can get a good impression of ics without hw acceleration by trying out v 0.1 from andromadus, which redefines slow.
Ah I see. Thanks.