Related
if i try taking a picture using my front camera, its really blurred... is it normal?, because i had some phones before that only have VGA Frontal Camera but the images seems to be fine...
i know that we have a great Main camera, but there will be times that you need to use this front camera especially if no one will took picture of you *with you're friends/gf* LOL.. because its hard to use main camera since there's no camera button...
mikey0105 said:
if i try taking a picture using my front camera, its really blurred... is it normal?, because i had some phones before that only have VGA Frontal Camera but the images seems to be fine...
i know that we have a great Main camera, but there will be times that you need to use this front camera especially if no one will took picture of you *with you're friends/gf* LOL.. because its hard to use main camera since there's no camera button...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah mine is blurry too. Looks like a mosaic lol. I find that there is also a red tint
Sent from my HTC One X using XDA
mikey0105 said:
if i try taking a picture using my front camera, its really blurred... is it normal?, because i had some phones before that only have VGA Frontal Camera but the images seems to be fine...
i know that we have a great Main camera, but there will be times that you need to use this front camera especially if no one will took picture of you *with you're friends/gf* LOL.. because its hard to use main camera since there's no camera button...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You probably need to get in there with a cotton bud.
You can always use the main camera with a 3 or 10 second timer.
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
kylec said:
Yeah mine is blurry too. Looks like a mosaic lol. I find that there is also a red tint
Sent from my HTC One X using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah... mine too...
Basil3 said:
You probably need to get in there with a cotton bud.
You can always use the main camera with a 3 or 10 second timer.
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i already did clean the lens... crystal clear but still its worst than most of VGA frontal cam?
thanks for the advice about the timer, but i'm still hoping for much better frontal cam...
The front camera is garbage. Mine makes me look bright pink! The main camera quality is also pretty average, I find it no better than my old Desire HD.
ozaghloul said:
The front camera is garbage. Mine makes me look bright pink! The main camera quality is also pretty average, I find it no better than my old Desire HD.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
will there be an app or ROM that can fix this?
sometimes there are bits of violet color, which make me look like barney.. LOL
For the red tinge, try dropping the saturation to -1. I don't have any focus problems tho.
cleaning the lens worked for me
mikey0105 said:
yeah... mine too...
i already did clean the lens... crystal clear but still its worst than most of VGA frontal cam?
thanks for the advice about the timer, but i'm still hoping for much better frontal cam...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
my front cam looked really horrible for a while... blurry, tint was way off, grainy, lots of artifacts. cleaning the recessed lens definitely did the trick for me.
Make sure you're well lit. Here's a sample from my camera for the quality you should expect.
Anyone have this issue?
All I can select is 1:1, 4:3, and 16:9. Nothing else. What the heck is this?
Same here. No quality adjustment. Only aspect ratio.
Same very weird
aachil said:
Same very weird
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Between this and the **** battery life im sending this thing back.
DrexelDragon said:
Between this and the **** battery life im sending this thing back.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What are you going to get? The S6 is way worse.
geoff5093 said:
What are you going to get? The S6 is way worse.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have an S6 Edge. My battery life is better on there than it is on my G4.
DrexelDragon said:
I have an S6 Edge. My battery life is better on there than it is on my G4.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
From owning the S6 for a week, and reading all the reviews and people posting here, I'd say it's unanimous that the battery on the S6 is awful. It would last half as long as my G3, and that was with many features disabled, bloatware disabled, and I used Greenify. Great battery life when using the phone, but standby was awful.
Why would you want to turn the photo quality down?
chrisokaly said:
Why would you want to turn the photo quality down?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Jesus. The problem is there's no indication of what resolution you are taking the picture at at ALL. An idiotic thing to leave out of a camera app.
DrexelDragon said:
Jesus. The problem is there's no indication of what resolution you are taking the picture at at ALL. An idiotic thing to leave out of a camera app.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly!
chrisokaly said:
Why would you want to turn the photo quality down?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So many reasons......
File size, image size, image preview speeds, upload limits on websites, being unecessary in general, etc. It's really sad that there's no resolution adjustment.....
Maybe check for a photo size option? Like S/M/L? My DSLR does it like that.
Hi everyone,
While I'm waiting for my phone to reach me, I have a recommendation and suggestion.
I believe changing the aspect ratio itself will adjust the resolution.
As with my previous phones, I think the 4:3 ratio would be the full, native, 16 MP resolution, or a photo size of 4608 x 3456 (multiply 4608 by 3456, you get 15.9 million pixels, or 16 MP)
A middle resolution would be the 16:9 ratio
The lower resolution would be the 1:1 ratio
Please, if someone could take a photo with the last 2 ratios, and let us know the photo dimensions, then we can figure out the resolution
Update:
Well... it seems I may have been wrong.
I found some 16:9 photos on this forum, and judging by the size, they're also 16 MP. It's very odd but it looks like this could be possible because of a customized sensor.
I'm not sure how it works really, but my theory goes down the drain :/
I agree, it is irritating. Likewise there is no indication on the video side of things what frame-rates everything is recorded in, having a choice between 1080p30 and 1080p60 would be good, as well as 720p30/60/120.
I find myself using the native app for random quick pictures and then using FV-5 for more indepth photography...
nadram said:
Hi everyone,
While I'm waiting for my phone to reach me, I have a recommendation and suggestion.
I believe changing the aspect ratio itself will adjust the resolution.
As with my previous phones, I think the 4:3 ratio would be the full, native, 16 MP resolution, or a photo size of 4608 x 3456 (multiply 4608 by 3456, you get 15.9 million pixels, or 16 MP)
A middle resolution would be the 16:9 ratio
The lower resolution would be the 1:1 ratio
Please, if someone could take a photo with the last 2 ratios, and let us know the photo dimensions, then we can figure out the resolution
Update:
Well... it seems I may have been wrong.
I found some 16:9 photos on this forum, and judging by the size, they're also 16 MP. It's very odd but it looks like this could be possible because of a customized sensor.
I'm not sure how it works really, but my theory goes down the drain :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have tried it
the 16:9 is the full resolution
both 4:3 and 1:1 are cropped images
Salbawardi2 said:
I have tried it
the 16:9 is the full resolution
both 4:3 and 1:1 are cropped images
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Also no choice for RAW unless in manual mode. RAW 16:9 option would be nice for auto along with other resolution choice.
Just to confirm, the default 16:9 ratio gives you the full 16MP.
starfcker69 said:
Also no choice for RAW unless in manual mode. RAW 16:9 option would be nice for auto along with other resolution choice.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's true, but you can go into manual mode and not toggle things you want to change, which basically means it's still in auto mode, except you can now get RAW.
just use Google camera
Delirious17 said:
just use Google camera
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Google camera lets you shoot in raw?
no but you can at least change the resolution for your pictures, solution for that for now
Delirious17 said:
no but you can at least change the resolution for your pictures, solution for that for now
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So you buy the G4 only to load Google Camera with its crappy processing?
Many of us agree the video quality is just Okay when compared to the photo quality. What I'm trying to figure out, if this is across the board with everyone? Has anyone taken video in lighting in the house? If so, did it come out just Okay? Like I said, photo quality is great, just the video I have an issue with.
Try to turn off the stabilizer indoor it gives better video quality,no more image crop.
gm007 said:
Try to turn off the stabilizer indoor it gives better video quality,no more image crop.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Already done that.
Don_Perrignon said:
Already done that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe you can upload a short video?
The video quality indoor is good not sure what's wrong with ur phone.
gm007 said:
Maybe you can upload a short video?
The video quality indoor is good not sure what's wrong with ur phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JL2SlLbnUR4&t=44s
Here's one I took without the stabilizer.
Don_Perrignon said:
&t=44s
Here's one I took without the stabilizer.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is very good video talking about details,but if you means the colors not accurate it's because the halogen lights can trick the auto white balance,not only in this phone in every other phone too.
You can try the manual white balance but not sure if there is a preset for this kind of lighting.
gm007 said:
This is very good video talking about details,but if you means the colors not accurate it's because the halogen lights can trick the auto white balance,not only in this phone in every other phone too.
You can try the manual white balance but not sure if there is a preset for this kind of lighting.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, I guess I'm picky. How do you feel about this phone in low light video?
Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using XDA-Developers Legacy app
Don_Perrignon said:
Ok, I guess I'm picky. How do you feel about this phone in low light video?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Perfect for a phone.
Guys can anyone explain the utility of the second camera??
For night time shoots low light lens
Ranop11 said:
For night time shoots low light lens
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lot of reviewers are saying it doesn't have any effect on low light photos
2nd lens is for taking pictures when light level is below 10 lux, for portrait mode and for autofocusing.
But in reality, the mechanism involved for taking low light pics is kind of useless and the end result is gimmicky and useless.
it's for bokeh effect and depth sening
AlMaghraby said:
it's for bokeh effect and depth sening
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope you're wrong. The depth effect and bokkeh on one plus 5t are software based
Docxsido said:
Nope you're wrong. The depth effect and bokkeh on one plus 5t are software based
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if so try to block the other lens while trying to do portrait
AlMaghraby said:
if so try to block the other lens while trying to do portrait
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The have the same focal length bro, they can't do a hardware bokkeh
Docxsido said:
The have the same focal length bro, they can't do a hardware bokkeh
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
they can
one is collecting depth data the other is photo
also the portrait mode is limited to a distance where there is focusing contrast
Docxsido said:
The have the same focal length bro, they can't do a hardware bokkeh
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try this...
Yep it's basically useless lens. Cheap way to make it more attractive for noobs
It's low light camera. I can definetly see them switch sometimes.
Also has a wider FOV (i don't know why), look at 1080p 60. Although i think that is without the EIS cut-in.
Also the bokeh effect can be done by having one focus near (at face) and one focus far (at landscape), and the bits in focus at far are blurred more. It is basically software, but with two lenses it can be better.
Ok, perhaps an overstrong heading! But this is just my opinion - I actually don't find the superwide nearly as useful as I thought I would. First of all, the quality isn't great and secondly the distortion from it being such a small lens makes it interesting, but not particularly useful. It's especially bad if people are in the picture. I'm really interested to know where people have used it where it actually added some value.
ekerbuddyeker said:
Ok, perhaps an overstrong heading! But this is just my opinion - I actually don't find the superwide nearly as useful as I thought I would. First of all, the quality isn't great and secondly the distortion from it being such a small lens makes it interesting, but not particularly useful. It's especially bad if people are in the picture. I'm really interested to know where people have used it where it actually added some value.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wouldn't agree for main camera superwide, i managed to took some nice pics that i couldn't capture otherwise, quality is not the point here, but what you can capture with it.
BUT! my real question is, what is the freaking point of 2 cameras on front?They make almost no difference between each other..
ivicask said:
I wouldn't agree for main camera superwide, i managed to took some nice pics that i couldn't capture otherwise, quality is not the point here, but what you can capture with it.
BUT! my real question is, what is the freaking point of 2 cameras on front?They make almost no difference between each other..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can't actually use the second camera on the front it is just solely for depth information to the other sensor
Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
oneandroidnut said:
You can't actually use the second camera on the front it is just solely for depth information to the other sensor
Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then what does the switch does?It changes between 2 what if not cameras, and angle changes just a bit.
ivicask said:
Then what does the switch does?It changes between 2 what if not cameras, and angle changes just a bit.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It crops it. All from one sensor cover the one up and try it. Still will switch between cropped and not
Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
oneandroidnut said:
It crops it. All from one sensor cover the one up and try it. Still will switch between cropped and not
Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I see now, still i think that button it pointless, it does nothing, its minimum crop, can someone explain me actually the point of it?
ivicask said:
I see now, still i think that button it pointless, it does nothing, its minimum crop, can someone explain me actually the point of it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not a clue should have had a wide angle selfie lense like the pixel 3 xl
Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
ekerbuddyeker said:
Ok, perhaps an overstrong heading! But this is just my opinion - I actually don't find the superwide nearly as useful as I thought I would. First of all, the quality isn't great and secondly the distortion from it being such a small lens makes it interesting, but not particularly useful. It's especially bad if people are in the picture. I'm really interested to know where people have used it where it actually added some value.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Extremely useful when travelling and trying to take pictures of architecture. Most cities in the world are very dense and objects are large, with limited space to position yourself for a photo. Your only choice here is to carry an ultra-wide lens. Most of my pictures from my recent trip to Vienna were done in ultra-wide. Stick it into DxO ViewPoint and correct the geometry and you have fantastic photos.
For me, Its a useful option in the right situations...
It's useless until you need it. I thought it was the useless but when in a tight space where you need to capture more area in your photo, the wide angle is extremely useful. Happens a lot to me when I take photos for site inspections (construction job).
freezingpoint said:
It's useless until you need it. I thought it was the useless but when in a tight space where you need to capture more area in your photo, the wide angle is extremely useful. Happens a lot to me when I take photos for site inspections (construction job).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Or taking a photo for a group of people and the space is somewhat tight you cant go so much backwards
Completely useful since I remember in my LG G6 u can capture interesting perspectives.