Develop Bugs

ASOP vs modified stock ROM?

What are the differences between ASOP and modified stock ROM?
Thanks!!!

Aosp stands for android open source project. It is a rom built from the android source code. It is more of a pure android experience versus the heavily modified android roms that the manufacturers create.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda premium

"Android Open Source Project" or "AOSP" to refer to the people, the processes, and the source code that make up Android.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

Aosp (cm9 by ktoonsez/650) has amazing battery life and seems to work just fine. Cm10 IMO is trash...right now there are just far to many issues. Stock modified ROM you will lose battery faster and lose easy theming/easy customization options. As in center clock...battery icon and widget buttons to name a few. Cm aokp has power saving options too that help a ton.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk 2

hallo13th said:
Aosp (cm9 by ktoonsez/650) has amazing battery life and seems to work just fine. Cm10 IMO is trash...right now there are just far to many issues. Stock modified ROM you will lose battery faster and lose easy theming/easy customization options. As in center clock...battery icon and widget buttons to name a few. Cm aokp has power saving options too that help a ton.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm purrrdy sure aokp is built off cm so calling it trash is a bit much, considering they have the same exact bugs. Aosp means its pure android, how Google intended...no themes or Ui overlays like sense/touchwiz.
Aokp is cool BC there's ton of customization options and tends to give better battery life/performance since it leaves a much smaller footprint on the android os (isn't hogging resources with ridiculous themes and bloatware)
Stock sg3 is cool BC of the motion features and pure stability

ASOP rom will not have
Samsungs Media codecs (no hardware media playback no mkv,xvid support ect.),
wont have cool motion sense features,
no samsungs widgets,
no feature rich contacts ect (google vanila one sucks)
some apps will be missing.
some other features i don't recall probably.
What ASOP will have
less bloat
arguably more customization
basically useless naked OS.

hallo13th said:
Cm10 IMO is trash...right now there are just far to many issues.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The term is alpha or beta, they don't come close to claiming it's stable yet. CM9 is pretty stable though.
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using Tapatalk 2

I was running CM9 then moved to CM10, and now im back to pure stock, i just debloated it myself.
To be honest, stock has more functionality to it. and AOSP, you have to build the functionality to your likes which makes it far more user customizeable.
I prefer Samsung rom because visually they look better, have pretty good battery life in my case, and they just everything working in them, as opposed to AOSP that has some kinks in them but still usable.
My two cents.

I do like aosp better normally, but Sammy did a good job with ics, with some theming of course. And my battery is a thousand times better on stock then aokp.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk 2

And lets not get dyslexic with it either. It's A.O.S.P.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda premium

TIL that some people think touchwiz looks better than Jelly Bean.
Wow.

hallo13th said:
Aosp (cm9 by ktoonsez/650) has amazing battery life and seems to work just fine. Cm10 IMO is trash...right now there are just far to many issues. Stock modified ROM you will lose battery faster and lose easy theming/easy customization options. As in center clock...battery icon and widget buttons to name a few. Cm aokp has power saving options too that help a ton.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im sorry to inform u but ur very wrong... center clock is easy and toggle buttons are stock and battery life will not be shorter on Samsung roms... i myself can prove all this and samsung roms have powersave also... please don't misguide people... take a look at my screenies
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda premium

Consider AOSP a fresh installation of Windows 7 done yourself, and the Stock Modified roms similar to an out of box experience with a new HP purchased at bestbuy - full of ****ty, half assed, bloatware.
Most stock roms come in at around 600mb these days... AOSP roms are under 200mb, with google apps.

hapticxchaos said:
I'm purrrdy sure aokp is built off cm so calling it trash is a bit much, considering they have the same exact bugs. Aosp means its pure android, how Google intended...no themes or Ui overlays like sense/touchwiz.
Aokp is cool BC there's ton of customization options and tends to give better battery life/performance since it leaves a much smaller footprint on the android os (isn't hogging resources with ridiculous themes and bloatware)
Stock sg3 is cool BC of the motion features and pure stability
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
howtomen said:
Im sorry to inform u but ur very wrong... center clock is easy and toggle buttons are stock and battery life will not be shorter on Samsung roms... i myself can prove all this and samsung roms have powersave also... please don't misguide people... take a look at my screenies
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't know if you read my post right I was saying aokp based on cm9 by ktoonsez and 650 is great. Pretty sure cm9 and cm10 don't have the same bugs actually. That wouldn't make much sense at all. Also aokp cm9 by ktoonsez can get 40 hours easy with 3 hours screen on time. Double the Sammy roms so sorry you lose. Also might I add that you should return aosp/aokp and look into the options yourself.

hallo13th said:
Don't know if you read my post right I was saying aokp based on cm9 by ktoonsez and 650 is great. Pretty sure cm9 and cm10 don't have the same bugs actually. That wouldn't make much sense at all. Also aokp cm9 by ktoonsez can get 40 hours easy with 3 hours screen on time. Double the Sammy roms so sorry you lose. Also might I add that you should return aosp/aokp and look into the options yourself.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude you realize there is things in stock kernels that isn't open sourced yet by Qualcomm, something with dalvik if I remember correctly. This give stock based roms the edge for battery life...
Either way its all in how you use the phone, so showing screenies of battery life is pretty useless.
Just because you like aokp doesn't mean it is the best. Smh.

hallo13th said:
Don't know if you read my post right I was saying aokp based on cm9 by ktoonsez and 650 is great. Pretty sure cm9 and cm10 don't have the same bugs actually. That wouldn't make much sense at all. Also aokp cm9 by ktoonsez can get 40 hours easy with 3 hours screen on time. Double the Sammy roms so sorry you lose. Also might I add that you should return aosp/aokp and look into the options yourself.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your right I didn't read your post after "cm10 is trash" and after some verification, aokp is most certainly built off of cm, haven't you noticed task updates right after cm to include all the bug fixes they've merged? Which isnt to say task doesn't do his own bug fixing, just purely that for the most part, yes, any bugs in cm will be present in aokp. The aosp with better battery life is of course "in theory" because the underlying principles that pure aosp uses less resources and is more optimizes...admittedly this isn't always the case but is true nonetheless.
Damn. I lost the retard game. Its OK, I've got 2 life's left.
---------- Post added at 12:42 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:37 PM ----------
PS your battery usage ss are trash.

hapticxchaos said:
Your right I didn't read your post after "cm10 is trash" and after some verification, aokp is most certainly built off of cm, haven't you noticed task updates right after cm to include all the bug fixes they've merged? Which isnt to say task doesn't do his own bug fixing, just purely that for the most part, yes, any bugs in cm will be present in aokp. The aosp with better battery life is of course "in theory" because the underlying principles that pure aosp uses less resources and is more optimizes...admittedly this isn't always the case but is true nonetheless.
Damn. I lost the retard game. Its OK, I've got 2 life's left.
---------- Post added at 12:42 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:37 PM ----------
PS your battery usage ss are trash.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol your so lost. Cm10 vs cm9 is what we r talking about. Cm10 is buggy RIGHT NOW. It randomly reboots which IMO is trash. Cm9, aokp or aosp based on cm9 has power saving settings which saves a ton of battery. Sammy ROMs do not have this and neither does cm10 nor does aokp or aosp based on cm10. This is fact so stop arguing. You lose once again. READ
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk 2
---------- Post added at 11:54 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:50 PM ----------
Igotsanevo4g said:
Dude you realize there is things in stock kernels that isn't open sourced yet by Qualcomm, something with dalvik if I remember correctly. This give stock based roms the edge for battery life...
Either way its all in how you use the phone, so showing screenies of battery life is pretty useless.
Just because you like aokp doesn't mean it is the best. Smh.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My screenshot is old. I use a stock modded ROM by smartguy. Tell the other guy his screens are useless. If someone doesn't post a ss they are full of crap if they do post them they are irrelevant. Amazing.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk 2

Debloating my stock rom and JuiceDefender have significantly helped battery life, but it still doesn't compare to the amazing battery life I was getting with CM9, both w/similar usage patterns.
I preferred AOSP ROMs over Sense w/my previous HTC phone, but the stock ROM is a much better experience on the S3 compared to what any of the AOSP ROMs currently offer, IMO. Maybe that will change when AOKP JB and CM10 are more polished. But they still won't have the voice, motion & other features that make the S3 a special device. Those features might not be important to some, but if that's the case, maybe a Galaxy Nexus, where you can have a JB now, is a "better" phone.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk 2

hallo13th said:
Lol your so lost. Cm10 vs cm9 is what we r talking about. Cm10 is buggy RIGHT NOW. It randomly reboots which IMO is trash. Cm9, aokp or aosp based on cm9 has power saving settings which saves a ton of battery. Sammy ROMs do not have this and neither does cm10 nor does aokp or aosp based on cm10. This is fact so stop arguing. You lose once again. READ
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk 2
---------- Post added at 11:54 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:50 PM ----------
My screenshot is old. I use a stock modded ROM by smartguy. Tell the other guy his screens are useless. If someone doesn't post a ss they are full of crap if they do post them they are irrelevant. Amazing.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The only points I was arguing was that any bugs present in cm are going to be present in aokp, and that aosp should "in theory" should perform and give better battery life, purely on principle. Go troll in the aokp thread with your battery screen shots and ego. I may have lost your retard game, but your still a loser

hallo13th said:
Lol your so lost. Cm10 vs cm9 is what we r talking about. Cm10 is buggy RIGHT NOW. It randomly reboots which IMO is trash. Cm9, aokp or aosp based on cm9 has power saving settings which saves a ton of battery. Sammy ROMs do not have this and neither does cm10 nor does aokp or aosp based on cm10. This is fact so stop arguing. You lose once again. READ
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk 2
---------- Post added at 11:54 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:50 PM ----------
My screenshot is old. I use a stock modded ROM by smartguy. Tell the other guy his screens are useless. If someone doesn't post a ss they are full of crap if they do post them they are irrelevant. Amazing.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Honestly i have a feeling ur not on sammy roms a lot or ur just ignorant and new to all this so u dont know what ur talking about... first off sammy roms most of the time have an edge on battery life... and aosp while not having horrible battery still doesnt match... sammy has powersaving to and of ur talking about voltage options then ur dumb i would use voltage control over any aokp or cm included options...
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda premium

[DISCUSSION] Cyanogenmod 9.1.0

Figured I'd start this thread since I didn't see one. So far his has been running perfectly for me using stock kernel and whatnot. I do have one issue though. It seems as if speaker volume has decreased with this release. Anyone else experiencing this?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using xda premium

Had it flashed for a few hours now (haven't changed from the kernel it flashes with).
I don't notice any difference however I rarely even use the external speakers. I usually have it plugged into my car via aux cable for music. So I might be unable to make a good comparison of it since I rarely use it.
However these are the notable changes I've noticed:
- Less battery drain (literally same settings/apps used rom toolbox pro to backup/restore them, haven't added or removed anything)
- Camera opens every time now (previously crashed on CM9RC2 and prior versions)
- Faster power-off
- Faster ADB connection (this might just be my computer)
I'm not sure what's on the full changelog as I rarely look, but this one seems much more stable over CM9RC2 (obviously, since so many new changes were committed).
All-in-all, I have to say I'm happy with this version until we get our first stable release candidate of CM10. There's almost nothing to complain about.

Good good. I'm having an awesome experience with it including battery life. Indont listen to music through my speakers much either lol I mean ringtone and notification loudness. Definitely notice a difference in loudness with it.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using xda premium

Jumping on board and shall be trying this soon. Battery life was one of the things keeping me away from CM9 despite loving it to death. If it was actually improved, consider me a very happy man.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2

Digital1325 said:
Jumping on board and shall be trying this soon. Battery life was one of the things keeping me away from CM9 despite loving it to death. If it was actually improved, consider me a very happy man.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes very much improved.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Almost 2 hours screen on time so far. I'll go as far as saying that cm9 is perfect for his device now.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using xda premium

RushAOZ said:
Yes very much improved.
View attachment 1291663
Almost 2 hours screen on time so far. I'll go as far as saying that cm9 is perfect for his device now.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not sure if it's just me or placebo, but the UI feels JB fast on this!

Yea man its about as good as its gonna get IMO. Oh one more thing that battery life screenie I took earlier is from the phones first cycle! It will only get better!! Not to mention I tweaked the ondemand governor to performance settings to make it even faster and smoother! Feel free to try them out yourself. You'll need setCPU.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using xda premium

Digital1325 said:
I'm not sure if it's just me or placebo, but the UI feels JB fast on this!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Also I agree with you about the JB smoothness it isn't a placebo effect. But I can explain it. For some reason JB isn't as smooth as its supposed to be on this phone. If you grab a galaxy nexus with JB on it you'll know what I mean. I flash my home girls gnex with JB updates and I question why its smoother on that device. Maybe its because the gnex CPU and GPU are better than the t989. Not sure but its noticeably smoother. JB has got a ways to go on this phone.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using xda premium

RushAOZ said:
Yea man its about as good as its gonna get IMO. Oh one more thing that battery life screenie I took earlier is from the phones first cycle! It will only get better!! Not to mention I tweaked the ondemand governor to performance settings to make it even faster and smoother! Feel free to try them out yourself. You'll need setCPU.
View attachment 1291697View attachment 1291698
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the tip. Going to try those settings out now. And I know what you mean. I'm sure our phone has the horsepower under it to make it as smooth as possible, but I guess our drivers aren't as optimized as they should be. Almost bought a GNex during their sale but ended up getting PC parts instead. Our phone will catch up one of these days. But I guess we have fragmentation and manufacturer bloat to blame for that.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2

Digital1325 said:
Thanks for the tip. Going to try those settings out now. And I know what you mean. I'm sure our phone has the horsepower under it to make it as smooth as possible, but I guess our drivers aren't as optimized as they should be. Almost bought a GNex during their sale but ended up getting PC parts instead. Our phone will catch up one of these days. But I guess we have fragmentation and manufacturer bloat to blame for that.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
HAHA that's hilarious!!! I chose to buy an i5 2500k/Asus tri-sli/8gb gskill instead of buying the gnex!! Haha great minds think alike. It would have been worth it though. I flash my home girls gnex at least 2 times a month and JB is bug free and noticeably smoother than on this phone. Not to say this phones bad. Its gonna have to last me until the galaxy nexus 2 releases.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using xda premium

What is this CM 9.1??? I though they were not gonna make this one! any ways can you all see if SimplyTapp its on this build?

RushAOZ said:
Also I agree with you about the JB smoothness it isn't a placebo effect. But I can explain it. For some reason JB isn't as smooth as its supposed to be on this phone. If you grab a galaxy nexus with JB on it you'll know what I mean. I flash my home girls gnex with JB updates and I question why its smoother on that device. Maybe its because the gnex CPU and GPU are better than the t989. Not sure but its noticeably smoother. JB has got a ways to go on this phone.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
None of the existing AOSP JB builds have the driver updates needed for Project Butter to fully function yet.
gypsy214 said:
What is this CM 9.1??? I though they were not gonna make this one! any ways can you all see if SimplyTapp its on this build?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As I noted in the main dev thread, it's not included, but instead can be downloaded from the Play Store. I can confirm it launches and doesn't force close, which they said it would if you're not on CM9.1, which is required to support it.

Wow, its like stable releases on a monthly basis, gotta love CM team.
Flashing this **** now

upgrading from CM9.0 to CM9.1 didn't work, keeps getting on "finalizing start up" after the upgrade and it stays there forever like 3 hours
tried all kind of things
end up having to simple do a full wipe, and flash CM9.1 clean, and restoring all the backups
now everything is fine, testing BLN to see if it hangs like on 9.0

RushAOZ said:
HAHA that's hilarious!!! I chose to buy an i5 2500k/Asus tri-sli/8gb gskill instead of buying the gnex!! Haha great minds think alike. It would have been worth it though. I flash my home girls gnex at least 2 times a month and JB is bug free and noticeably smoother than on this phone. Not to say this phones bad. Its gonna have to last me until the galaxy nexus 2 releases.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hilarious, I too went for 8GB of Gskill, but went with the Gigabyte Z77 (UD3H) and a 2700k instead. Not a fan of SLI/Crossfire setups (bad experiences in the past) . Figure one GTX 670 should do the trick. What cards are you looking to triple SLI? That should be pretty beastly!
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2

Having a mixed experience with 9.1. It was great at first but then started to slow down (noticeable while browsing with a lot of tabs) and heats up fairly quickly. This is without playing with clock speeds.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2

I posted this in the Dev thread but thought it might be more appropriate here... didn't see this until after.
I had serious battery problems on all CM9 and 10s (including nightlies) for our phone but 9.1 stable is running great on its first full day with TDJ's 6.2 CM9 kernel using badass governor:
Sorry, don't know how to make a thumb.
Only about 10 minutes of screen-on time--stuck in meetings most of the day--but still very impressive. Loving CM9 now that it isn't killing my battery.

scotty-dont said:
I posted this in the Dev thread but thought it might be more appropriate here... didn't see this until after.
I had serious battery problems on all CM9 and 10s (including nightlies) for our phone but 9.1 stable is running great on its first full day with TDJ's 6.2 CM9 kernel using badass governor:
Sorry, don't know how to make a thumb.
Only about 10 minutes of screen-on time--stuck in meetings most of the day--but still very impressive. Loving CM9 now that it isn't killing my battery.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice!!
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using xda premium

Digital1325 said:
Hilarious, I too went for 8GB of Gskill, but went with the Gigabyte Z77 (UD3H) and a 2700k instead. Not a fan of SLI/Crossfire setups (bad experiences in the past) . Figure one GTX 670 should do the trick. What cards are you looking to triple SLI? That should be pretty beastly!
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nah no sli here for the same reasons lol I had to upgrade from my trusty q6600 setup. It was bottlenecking the crap out of my gtx 460 in bf3 64 player matches. Planning on picking up a gtx 660ti at some point. Gtx 460 is starting to show its age lol
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using xda premium

Battery on its second cycle. 12 hours and 3 and a half hours screen on time ain't too shabby for its second run!!
If anyone wants to know my settings and whatnot.. stock kernel, CPU sleeper and I even tweaked the governor for even more speed and smoothness!
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using xda premium

I can't see past stock jelly bean after flashing countless ROMs

Please can someone try and change my mind because I'm only disappointed and let down every time I try one .
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

DAZEBOY said:
Please can someone try and change my mind because I'm only disappointed and let down every time I try one .
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What exactly are you disappointed about? Try the latest official builds of cm10 or aokp. Not a nightly or a kang.. an official build.

Try Paranoid, it looks pretty wild!

SHHHH!!!! You're not allowed to say that!
I've done the same as you. The only change I've made to stock is run nova launcher to make it a bit more purdy and personalized.
Minco is pretty nice since it's really close to stock but faster, but in the end I'd rather just run stock for peace of mind (not that Minco was unstable).

Stock based roms perform the best in my opinion. Although Bamf Paradigm and Wasabi Miui run well for me, if I run them with trinity 1344 kernel.
IMO It seems like CM and AOKP stay in the nighties phase for way too long, and bugs and stability issues take too long to fix. This has been the case on most phones I have owned. They are great innovative roms though. I find it rare when a Rom with loads and loads of features runs as good as stock based roms do. I love having features, but performance, stability and battery life are above all features for me. I can just find mods myself anyways and add them as I need.

If stock is what works best for you, run stock, there's nothing wrong with that.

Why do you want people to change your mind?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

The last ROM flashed was team baked black ROM it was OK but the force issues became very annoying .I was just asking am I doing something wrong when flashing ? I don't seem to get the same user experience from using jelly bean.There is only one feature I've used that isn't stock is fast reply which I think is brilliant and will definitely be in 4.2
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

DAZEBOY said:
The last ROM flashed was team baked black ROM it was OK but the force issues became very annoying .I was just asking am I doing something wrong when flashing ? I don't seem to get the same user experience from using jelly bean.There is only one feature I've used that isn't stock is fast reply which I think is brilliant and will definitely be in 4.2
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fast reply, I don't even know what that is but anyway, Android comes down to user preference, if you enjoy stock, then rock it dude, I've tried only a handful of roms here but stock gives the most solid performance 9 out of ten times. granted I'm running Slimbean now, but I like to flash every two weeks and this rom is pretty great aside from bootup time XD.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

i just hit 260h with no reboots. custom built from src, JRO03R, maguro. rock stable so far. gcc 4.7.0.
just saying, stock can be rock stable, and still be fast and responsive, if you're willing to tweak it and spend time testing it.
sent from my i9250

bk201doesntexist said:
i just hit 260h with no reboots. custom built from src, JRO03R, maguro. rock stable so far. gcc 4.7.0.
just saying, stock can be rock stable, and still be fast and responsive, if you're willing to tweak it and spend time testing it.
sent from my i9250
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've tweaked till the cows come home but I think Google have totally cracked it to be honest and early reports about 4.2 seem to suggest they've went one more step in terms of speed and look .The quick reply feature is in cm10 when you receive a SMS you get a pop up window at anytime so you can instantly reply ,must be enabled tho .
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

paranoidandroid is the bomb

DAZEBOY said:
Please can someone try and change my mind because I'm only disappointed and let down every time I try one .
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i love love love stock Jelly Bean. That is what i run, so i suppose i also can not see past stock JB.
i wouldn't say i'm "disappointed" in any ROMS I've tried, just that i personally have found no need to move away from stock.

crixley said:
paranoidandroid is the bomb
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think I might give paranoid a go tomorrow and see if I can feel the love again
But the best part of all of this is WE CAN !
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

bk201doesntexist said:
i just hit 260h with no reboots. custom built from src, JRO03R, maguro. rock stable so far. gcc 4.7.0.
just saying, stock can be rock stable, and still be fast and responsive, if you're willing to tweak it and spend time testing it.
sent from my i9250
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Even with no tweaks it ran perfect for me i guess Verizon took their time for a reason, or they're just slow. Lol
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

DAZEBOY said:
I think I might give paranoid a go tomorrow and see if I can feel the love again
But the best part of all of this is WE CAN !
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You won't regret it dude
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app

I decided to give the latest Paranoid Android a try. I am running it with the latest franco stable milestone 5. Its running pretty excellent with no bugs so far. This is an instance of a non stock ROM running pretty well. They did good on this 2.17 PA build.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus

stelv said:
I decided to give the latest Paranoid Android a try. I am running it with the latest franco stable milestone 5. Its running pretty excellent with no bugs so far. This is an instance of a non stock ROM running pretty well. They did good on this 2.17 PA build.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've downloaded it too using the goo app but can't download the bug fix zip .I'll flash it soon hopefully it give me the bug again
I'll report back soon
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

I've tried EOS, CM10, PA, for at least a few days each, and yep, I'm back on stock + Nova. Just couldn't be bothered any more with messing around with the others.

DAZEBOY said:
I've downloaded it too using the goo app but can't download the bug fix zip .I'll flash it soon hopefully it give me the bug again
I'll report back soon
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I may have spoke too soon. I cant get Bluetooth audio to work with PA. I haven't been able to download the bug fix either. Someone posted it in the PA thread but I haven't downloaded it yet
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus

ICS vs Jelly Bean vs Kit Kat

I recently bought my Galaxy Nexus with CM11 already installed. As of right now I am running the latest nightly "December 17, 2013). I have never had the chance to test out any ICS or JB ROMs.
What I want to know is if Kit Kat 4.4.2 is the fastest/smoothest ROM currently out for the GNexus or is the older ROMs much more faster/smoother? I do understand that Kit Kat isn't an official ROM and that we've lost official support from Google.
I NOTICED A GOOD AMOUNT OF LAG WITH THIS ROM AND WOULDN'T MIND DOWNGRADING IF THERE'S A MUCH FASTER/SMOOTHER ROM ALTHOUGH I RATHER STICK WITH KIT KAT (since its the latest).
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app

OuncE718 said:
I recently bought my Galaxy Nexus with CM11 already installed. As of right now I am running the latest nightly "December 17, 2013). I have never had the chance to test out any ICS or JB ROMs.
What I want to know is if Kit Kat 4.4.2 is the fastest/smoothest ROM currently out for the GNexus or is the older ROMs much more faster/smoother? I do understand that Kit Kat isn't an official ROM and that we've lost official support from Google.
I NOTICED A GOOD AMOUNT OF LAG WITH THIS ROM AND WOULDN'T MIND DOWNGRADING IF THERE'S A MUCH FASTER/SMOOTHER ROM ALTHOUGH I RATHER STICK WITH KIT KAT (since its the latest).
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If it had CM11 on it already, it must have a custom recovery already, so the best option for you is create a full backup, and then try flashing other roms untill you find one that suits you.
Frankly, a tiny bit of lag is acceptable to me, as long as I have the latest version of Android. Mine is at 4.2.2 right now. I don't notice any real difference in speed from previous roms.
All you can do is try some out. Polling to see what others get won't tell you how things run on your phone with your apps.

OuncE718 said:
I recently bought my Galaxy Nexus with CM11 already installed. As of right now I am running the latest nightly "December 17, 2013). I have never had the chance to test out any ICS or JB ROMs.
What I want to know is if Kit Kat 4.4.2 is the fastest/smoothest ROM currently out for the GNexus or is the older ROMs much more faster/smoother? I do understand that Kit Kat isn't an official ROM and that we've lost official support from Google.
I NOTICED A GOOD AMOUNT OF LAG WITH THIS ROM AND WOULDN'T MIND DOWNGRADING IF THERE'S A MUCH FASTER/SMOOTHER ROM ALTHOUGH I RATHER STICK WITH KIT KAT (since its the latest).
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the response but my post isn't intended to be a poll. I simply want to know if ICS or Jelly Bean ROM is faster/smoother than Kit Kat since Kit Kat isn't an official ROM. Not everybody has the time nor the patience to flash a bunch of different ROMs/kernel combinations and go through the process of restoring data, apps, accounts etc. NO OFFENSE
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app

i am now using parandroid rom , a 4.3 gelly bean , super fast and stble rom , with a lot of tweaks , very good battery life ( can last 4 hours screen on with web surfing and whatsapp ) ...
the main disadvantage ( which is not related to the rom itself ) is the wifi issue , i am a new user of the Gnex also , but i was shocked with the weak wifi signal comparing to older mobile phones ( i had the Desire HD ) , i've read a lot about the wifi issue which is almost related by most of the posts and threads to the jelly bean update , and i am thinking about giving ICS or KK a try as the wifi reception means a lot to me , the wifi router is quite far from my room and with this jelly bean software i am unable to connect , while i was able to connect easily using my old DHD .
so if you have your wif router close enough , try the parandroid rom , it's brilliant ...
by the way , any thing to say about wifi reception in KK ?

OuncE718 said:
Thanks for the response but my post isn't intended to be a poll. I simply want to know if ICS or Jelly Bean ROM is faster/smoother than Kit Kat since Kit Kat isn't an official ROM. Not everybody has the time nor the patience to flash a bunch of different ROMs/kernel combinations and go through the process of restoring data, apps, accounts etc. NO OFFENSE
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the response. The WiFi reception isn't that good. I've noticed the same with my Nexus 4 (that I recently sold). It may just be a software issue since the N4 was an LG product and obviously the GNexus a Samsung device. Don't get me wrong, Kit Kat is a cool ROM but it seems a bit laggy for me. It's stable enough as a daily ROM though. Maybe I'm being a bit picky.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app

In my opinion (I tried many ROMs so far) 4.1 is the smoothest and has best performances in overall. For me it would be 4.1>4.3>4.4>4.2>4.0

Godra said:
In my opinion (I tried many ROMs so far) 4.1 is the smoothest and has best performances in overall. For me it would be 4.1>4.3>4.4>4.2>4.0
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you on a stock ROM or a custom 4.1?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app

OuncE718 said:
Are you on a stock ROM or a custom 4.1?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Currently Im on 4.3, SlimBean Build 2.2.
Back in time, when I was on 4.1 I used stock,minco and Liquidsmooth (and Paranoid android 2.x for some short time)

what version or/and rom has the best wifi reception so far ?

I would say 4.1, stock or any AOSP based ROM, but it's fact that Galaxy Nexus has bad Wi-Fi radio, and custom ROMs and kernels can't change it significantly
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA Premium 4 mobile app

Blk for sure. Only 1 version released but oh my that was fast.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA Premium HD app

I much preferred ics
Beamed from my Galaxy Note 3

I've been running 4.1.2 for over a year now and it runs really great, I've tested many newer ROM's but they all had lag issues or just didn't have all the features I was looking for.
Recommend:
Paranoid Android 2.57 or 2.54
Zen v10 kernel
gapps-jb-20121011-signed
4.2_TransformPack_v2.1

isajoo said:
I've been running 4.1.2 for over a year now and it runs really great, I've tested many newer ROM's but they all had lag issues or just didn't have all the features I was looking for.
Recommend:
Paranoid Android 2.57 or 2.54
Zen v10 kernel
gapps-jb-20121011-signed
4.2_TransformPack_v2.1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
will you please provide us with the link of those parandroid 2.5x roms , as i looked for them with no result

ghassan haddad said:
will you please provide us with the link of those parandroid 2.5x roms , as i looked for them with no result
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here's the entire thread about 4.1.2 ROM's discussion/links:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2250855
Also here are the links/threads to the specific zip files I'm using:
2.55+ Paranoid Android + gapps
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1892214
v3.0.53-ZenSERIES_v10_4.1_Final_Tuna
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2072787
But download link in thread is dead.
http://db.tt/YG1tMQhZ
4.2_TransformPack_v2.1
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1969488
When flashing I installed in the following order:
ROM
Gapps
Transformpack
Kernel
Not sure if it makes any difference, but just remember to make a back up of your current ROM and have another functioning ROM zip file on your device before flashing, just in case.
LOL
Also highly suggest running in tablet mode.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

thanks a lot for your effort , i will test and reply

To me, the best right now would be Vanir 4.3. Crazy fast and everything works.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2404903

OuncE718 said:
Thanks for the response but my post isn't intended to be a poll. I simply want to know if ICS or Jelly Bean ROM is faster/smoother than Kit Kat since Kit Kat isn't an official ROM. Not everybody has the time nor the patience to flash a bunch of different ROMs/kernel combinations and go through the process of restoring data, apps, accounts etc. NO OFFENSE
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No offense to you but if you want to know what the best rom for your device is then you have to gain some time and patience to flash different roms, or in the very least read up about them on the threads here on XDA yourself. This is a developer community meant for adults that want to gain and share knowledge of how things work on mobile devices. This is not where you come to have answers spoon-fed to you because you are too lazy to take some time and figure things out for yourself. No one will ever be able to tell you what is the best for you, except yourself. If you don't have the patience then you should use the Nexus Toolkit, flash back to stock, lock your device and enjoy how the rom runs because those that are meant to be in this community have patience and make time to test what works for them. I may come off rude but this is just how it is, too many users come in here now and expect things on a silver platter, that is not how XDA works.
Do you know how much time and effort goes into building roms and kernels, or how much time people put into testing applications and settings in order to share their experience with others? It is kind of selfish to disregard those people by claiming you don't have enough patience to put some effort in yourself.
I have put months and months into just refining custom kernel settings that help users to gain optimal performance without sacrificing battery, lots of members come to my thread looking for help, if I decided I didn't have the time or patience to create a thread that gives a good base for setting up a custom kernel then alot of new users would be in the dark on what to do. Contributing is what makes this forum great, not looking for others to make the effort and for you to reap the benefits.
I think it's rather unfair that all the people on this thread have had to provide info and links to you when you could just as easily use the XDA search function and find them yourself. You've been a member since 2010, you should know better.

HTC One (M7VZW) codefireX

HTC One (M7VZW) codefireX
CodefireX 4.4.3.2.1.000.000 Open Master​
CodefireX.com​
This well established Android distribution treats development differently than any other to further our Android platform as a whole. This is the fastest source built ROM you will find on this forum, and also the only one to utilize our unique build system and a custom LLVM 3.5 suite based toolchain globally.
Here is our very well supported Issue Tracker.
We utilize a plethora of unique optimizations in a build system unlike any other:
Utilizing the LLVM CLANG CI globally, working heavily with upstreams with a goal of furthering our entire Android platform.
Consistently updated upstream toolchain module source with our custom backports, fixes, and optimizations applied in a patch at build time.
Fully built utilizing Link Time Optimization and Polly optimizations (another custom ROM first). Feel free to google these a bit.
Much of our source have code fixes, cleanups, and many minor optimizations to set us even further ahead of the community. These are too generous to even speak of here.
Optimizations are toggled on and off based on device for the best experience we can achieve for your device without sacrificing stability
Many Qcom optimizations and AOSP master (upstream) optimizations and fixes using device specifications to determine usage.
Fully built utilizing strict aliasing and isognu++11 mode.
Utilizing all O4 optimizations (Optimization Level 4) including LTO (with binutils plugins), and additionally LLVM Polly.
Of course we also have several neat UI features, including but not limited to:
T-Mobile Theme Engine.
DPI Wizard (no junk like build.prop tweaks).
Quick Settings panel customizations.
Live network stats in your statusbar.
Button backlight customizations.
Hardware button customizations.
Volume button customizations.
Many more being added during the nightly builds.
M7VZW Download & Support thread
Our thanks go out to all the open source developers who made our work possible.
Below is an ever-incomplete list of some of the 'indirect' contributors to our ROMs:
The Android Open Source Project
LLVM CI
Linux Foundation
Code Aurora Forum
CyanogenMod Inc.
Chainfire
Many more!
XDA:DevDB Information
codefireX, ROM for the Verizon HTC One
Contributors
jrior001, bigrushdog, ajf64, synergydev,anders3408,RaymanFX
ROM OS Version: 4.4.x KitKat
ROM Kernel: Linux 3.4.x
Based On: AOSP MASTER
Version Information
Status: Beta
Created 2014-02-13
Last Updated 2014-04-06

BETA TEST to ensure quality, if all is well as expected this will be added to our nightly builds soon

Thanks for the work. Can't wait to try it out.
Sent from my HTC6500LVW using xda app-developers app

What yeah boy this is a great ROM loved it on my DNA!!!!!
Sent from my One using Tapatalk

Question, as I haven't heard of this before...and I'm sure others are thinking it too:
Is this based off cm source, or is it vanilla that is enhanced? Thanks!
Sent from my HTC6500LVW using Tapatalk

Running great so far
Sent from my One using Tapatalk

brymaster5000 said:
Question, as I haven't heard of this before...and I'm sure others are thinking it too:
Is this based off cm source, or is it vanilla that is enhanced? Thanks!
Sent from my HTC6500LVW using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah...sorry about that gotta follow the team thread format.
So basically we took the aosp master branch, hardware support commits from CM/caf(aosp has very little love for qcom and they guys at CM are among the best at making things work smoothly) and added about the strictest tool chains/build system in the game right now. Push the optimizations as far as the devices csn handle, add in just few mostly custom features and you get heavily optimized almost vanilla AOSP.
Sent from my One Xl using Tapatalk

jtj1825 said:
Running great so far
Sent from my One using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good to hear, I was a little worried with VZW...ive noticed that cmda devices can be difficult and vzw devices are a little extra special
Sent from my One Xl using Tapatalk

jrior001 said:
Good to hear, I was a little worried with VZW...ive noticed that cmda devices can be difficult and vzw devices are a little extra special
Sent from my One Xl using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for bring this to us man Running smooth as butter. Had been running candykat for the last couple week. But this ROM is right up my ally smooth simple. Really hands down awesome!! Awesome!! Work man!!!
Sent from my One using Tapatalk

coachcrey said:
Thanks for bring this to us man Running smooth as butter. Had been running candykat for the last couple week. But this ROM is right up my ally smooth simple. Really hands down awesome!! Awesome!! Work man!!!
Sent from my One using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks but I gotta tell ya I mainly support the older model 8960's (one x, one s, evo 4g and inc 4g) all the credit for m7 series goes to our lead java/feature guy @bigrushdog who maintains the gsm version. He's just to busy making things awesome to maintain threads
Sent from my One Xl using Tapatalk

jrior001 said:
Thanks but I gotta tell ya I mainly support the older model 8960's (one x, one s, evo 4g and inc 4g) all the credit for m7 series goes to our lead java/feature guy @bigrushdog who maintains the gsm version. He's just to busy making things awesome to maintain threads
Sent from my One Xl using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good to know man well @bigrushdog thank you man this is great stuff!!!
Sent from my One using Tapatalk

jrior001 said:
Yeah...sorry about that gotta follow the team thread format.
So basically we took the aosp master branch, hardware support commits from CM/caf(aosp has very little love for qcom and they guys at CM are among the best at making things work smoothly) and added about the strictest tool chains/build system in the game right now. Push the optimizations as far as the devices csn handle, add in just few mostly custom features and you get heavily optimized almost vanilla AOSP.
Sent from my One Xl using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for explaining a bit more. This Rom looks interesting. I was just curious as cm's recent decision to unify the kernel for all 8960 devices...has been causing issues for the m7.
Sent from my HTC6500LVW using Tapatalk

brymaster5000 said:
Thanks for explaining a bit more. This Rom looks interesting. I was just curious as cm's recent decision to unify the kernel for all 8960 devices...has been causing issues for the m7.
Sent from my HTC6500LVW using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Elaborate please?...other than the occasional screen on delay(which on one x I've gotten used to, been around a while) we hadn't notice much in testing. This is built with that unified kernel BTW.
Sent from my One Xl using Tapatalk

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Justbthought I'd leave this here blazing fast!
Sent from my One using Tapatalk

Just flashed, but I have no network. No calls/texts or anything.
Am I doing something wrong?
EDIT: Also, my camera isn't working. I looked around on the cfx forums and these seem to not be problems for other people

Any word on official nightly builds for m7vzw?
Sent from my One using Tapatalk

coachcrey said:
Any word on official nightly builds for m7vzw?
Sent from my One using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My bad, i forgot to update the links when we got this one added to the build bot last week, Nightly link is fixed up at codefirex.com now.

jrior001 said:
My bad, i forgot to update the links when we got this one added to the build bot last week, Nightly link is fixed up at codefirex.com now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cool I was peeping around the website and it look like it was being built!!! Thanks man love this ROM!!
Sent from my One using Tapatalk

Does this ROM have the weird delay with auto brightness? I stopped using CM11 because when i would wake it up there would be a good 10 second delay before the brightness would catch up.
Also, does anyone know if mobile data works while connected to a Verizon Network Extender? GPE ROM"s and CM11 have no mobile data on the extender. (LTE / 3G work fine).
Looks interesting, would love to give it a shot. Thanks guys!

Sad day in the CFX world. CFX as we know it now is dead. Our 2 main leaders have parted ways with a difference of opinion in the future direction of the project. Thanks to all who have participated in this.
Mods its time to close up shop here.
Sent from my SCH-i705 using Tapatalk