ProBam Vs Cm11 - Galaxy Grand Duos i9082 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin

what is the best ?
probam or cm11

probam is very good but still lacks much arrangement, cm11 is also good but not as fluid as carbonrom ... CarbonRom is ideal for daily use rom is the perfect rom to play and hear music and there are no problems with this either no obstacles or whistling sounds or cuts to navigate both chrome or with dolphin is totally smooth, to use very many applications, the camera works perfect, perfect, I prefer Carbon Rom

Well its difficult to say..
Cm11 is base of it first of all..
As it is cm11 base and then added extra features...it got a bit leaa battery backup(if u use the features).. I mean..probam is loaded with hell of features....many of em..multiwindow and halo...and active display..blurr lockscreen...and notification on lockscreen...many of em...while cm11 is basic and simple rom..
But as they say... With great power comes more bugs .. The features in it are not greatly integrated..u can find many bugs while u using it..(not big..bt small and annoying for me)..i have posted too many times ..just read probam pages n u ll get it..
So on one hand is cm11...rom with basic aosp feeling...and on other is probam with hell of loaded amazing and beat features so far u can see on any custom rom..
Battery is also good..
Bad part is as gapps are preincluded...in the flashable package...and when u boot in ART..gapps FC's... So its worst thing they did including gapps in zip...
U cant use ART
Personnel advice...
Use carbon id u want ART and good battery...use slimkat for light weight...
Be a medium guy and use omni like me...test ur patience and take chances with probam.. ..hope i helped
Sent from my GT-I9082 using Tapatalk

I have been using pawitp's CM for forever now First CM10.1, now CM11... also tried ProBAM for 3 days.
If you 're looking for a stable and minimal ROM with no conflict of any modifications you want to add later on... CM is for you. No ROM has beat its stability and seamlessness. There's a reason why Cyanogen team has the most popular custom ROM in the world, it's because they're just so freakin good at it.
For performance... I think Slimkat has already beat CM due to its minimalistic approach... and I haven't tried Carbon yet.
ProBAM is well... a product of experiment. For people who wants no sacrifice, who wants to live on the edge and get all coolest features from all sorts of ROMs. If that's the kind of guy you are... go for it. Be prepared to face some glitches though, even though they are not major bugs that hinder the main functionality as a phone... it still needs further polishment to be suitable as a daily driver.

I think cm11 would be a good rom for you if you have to use it daily with no confliction and stable performance(even I am using cm11 right now)
On the other hand ProBam is for users who want to have the extra features squeezed out from their phone.
I prefer cm11:victory::victory::victory:

raghavsharmaxda said:
Well its difficult to say..
Cm11 is base of it first of all..
As it is cm11 base and then added extra features...it got a bit leaa battery backup(if u use the features).. I mean..probam is loaded with hell of features....many of em..multiwindow and halo...and active display..blurr lockscreen...and notification on lockscreen...many of em...while cm11 is basic and simple rom..
But as they say... With great power comes more bugs .. The features in it are not greatly integrated..u can find many bugs while u using it..(not big..bt small and annoying for me)..i have posted too many times ..just read probam pages n u ll get it..
So on one hand is cm11...rom with basic aosp feeling...and on other is probam with hell of loaded amazing and beat features so far u can see on any custom rom..
Battery is also good..
Bad part is as gapps are preincluded...in the flashable package...and when u boot in ART..gapps FC's... So its worst thing they did including gapps in zip...
U cant use ART
Personnel advice...
Use carbon id u want ART and good battery...use slimkat for light weight...
Be a medium guy and use omni like me...test ur patience and take chances with probam.. ..hope i helped
Sent from my GT-I9082 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
With great powers come more bugs lol
Sent from my GT-I9082 using Tapatalk

Cool so if we want a good rom without bugs go fot cm11
If we want a rom with bugs for any rom that based from cm
Sent from Galaxy Grand CM11 LAST BUILD 09012014

I use ProBAM Almost a week , it very good but there are some bugs I will try CM 11 today

Related

4.2.1 CyanogenMod 10.1 ROM

Hey everyone. Just wondering if anyone has had chance to install CyanogenMod 10.1 ROM and if it's good? I'd imagine it to be quite buggy at the moment due to the fact that it's only just been released. Quite keen to update to latest android 4.2.1 but don't want to update to a buggy ROM.
Links: http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/articles/4...oid421-jellybean-galaxy-note2-n7100-cm101.htm
http://get.cm/?device=n7100
I just flashed this rom to test it out. Lots of graphical bugs(especially when using the camera) and all of the S-pen features DO NOT WORK. And i also have noticed that my power off button whenever i click it , it does not turn off the screen to go in lockscreen. Other then that..man i was so happy to see AOSP i love it so damn much but..this is just not for me i wish these bugs were fixed and then AOSP is on!!! Thanks for the link though.
No worries for the link . I was surprised no one had been talking about it on here before when in posted it. Cyanogen seems that be the most popular ROM because it's Google stock and optimised. currently using ParanoidAndroid which is great. I highly recommend. Hopefully they'll release a 4.2.1 version of that soon!!
30secondstosam said:
No worries for the link . I was surprised no one had been talking about it on here before when in posted it. Cyanogen seems that be the most popular ROM because it's Google stock and optimised. currently using ParanoidAndroid which is great. I highly recommend. Hopefully they'll release a 4.2.1 version of that soon!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are there graphical like bugs on PA , I think the S-Pen features dont work on that too but you can get some apps to have like features and can i have the link to the version you are currently using please, Also hows the battery life on it ? Thanks!
Austin3161337 said:
Are there graphical like bugs on PA , I think the S-Pen features dont work on that too but you can get some apps to have like features and can i have the link to the version you are currently using please, Also hows the battery life on it ? Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No graphical bugs in PA at all (as far as I am aware). I'm really pleased with it. I'd recommend it to anyone. Tablet apps on this phone also work beautifully well. Like YouTube for instance.
Battery life is SLIGHTLY (we're talking marginal) decreased from Samsung ROM. However, to give you an example of how good the battery life still is - I go to work and use my phone throughout the day for Spotify. It's always connected to wifi at work as I have hardly any signal. I am also always connected to GPS so i can get the most out of things like google now etc. I unplug at 8:30 and get home for about 6:30 every night. My battery when I get home is usually 60%. So I can't complain. When I had my iPhone I used to have to stay constantly tethered!!

[Q]: Photosphere?

Hey guys I got lots of question (mix of dev and general stuff, forgive me if I posted in the wrong section).
I'm new to flashing and rooting, I just installed cyanogen mod 10.1 (after trying out CM 10.0 and 10.1.2)
> I noticed that 10.1.2 and 10.1 doesn't have the photosphere in the camera. Did I flash it wrong?
> My data connection turns on by itself, how can I disable it?
> Pinch to zoom out for homescreen is not working or CM doesn't have it?
> Any link for a stock samsung t989 camera app, keyboard app?
> FB can't sync contacts too (been looking for solutions)
Hope you can help me guys, I neve rthough that rooting and flashing custom rooms are fun and hoping to get extensive about it. Can't post in the dev section yet so here goes. No flames please.
eremes_nyc said:
Hey guys I got lots of question (mix of dev and general stuff, forgive me if I posted in the wrong section).
I'm new to flashing and rooting, I just installed cyanogen mod 10.1 (after trying out CM 10.0 and 10.1.2)
> I noticed that 10.1.2 and 10.1 doesn't have the photosphere in the camera. Did I flash it wrong?
> My data connection turns on by itself, how can I disable it?
> Pinch to zoom out for homescreen is not working or CM doesn't have it?
> Any link for a stock samsung t989 camera app, keyboard app?
> FB can't sync contacts too (been looking for solutions)
Hope you can help me guys, I neve rthough that rooting and flashing custom rooms are fun and hoping to get extensive about it. Can't post in the dev section yet so here goes. No flames please.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First u need to know that only certain roms will have the working photosphere camera as our device isn't really supported yet, second cm 10.1 (unless it on official) won't be flawless and will usually have some bugs, try something a little more stable, carbon, PAC man, or paranoid android are all good choices for a newbie, also make sure ur using the latest twrp recovery, and ur doing a full wipe on anything that's not a pure update, data turning on and pinch to expand are all issues with some cm builds so if ur looking for perfection go flash the official cm, if u want photosphere, I think carbon has a working version in that rom...
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
soupysoup said:
First u need to know that only certain roms will have the working photosphere camera as our device isn't really supported yet, second cm 10.1 (unless it on official) won't be flawless and will usually have some bugs, try something a little more stable, carbon, PAC man, or paranoid android are all good choices for a newbie, also make sure ur using the latest twrp recovery, and ur doing a full wipe on anything that's not a pure update, data turning on and pinch to expand are all issues with some cm builds so if ur looking for perfection go flash the official cm, if u want photosphere, I think carbon has a working version in that rom...
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have the CM10.1.2 stable build, read some stuff about the photosphere and you're right i got the HDR function so i'm good with that, I got the latest TWRP too, and SU, the data turning on by itself was a mistake i just misunderstood the status bar widget (x, h thingy on signal button is like on and off). The only thing I find is my battery kinda drains fast? faster than I remember when I still had the original ROM, and the charging is slow. I remember my phone charges in like 2 hours this one says fully charge in 4 hours.
Imma try the carbon and paranoid though. Thanks a lot.
eremes_nyc said:
I have the CM10.1.2 stable build, read some stuff about the photosphere and you're right i got the HDR function so i'm good with that, I got the latest TWRP too, and SU, the data turning on by itself was a mistake i just misunderstood the status bar widget (x, h thingy on signal button is like on and off). The only thing I find is my battery kinda drains fast? faster than I remember when I still had the original ROM, and the charging is slow. I remember my phone charges in like 2 hours this one says fully charge in 4 hours.
Imma try the carbon and paranoid though. Thanks a lot.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Remember too, u will never see good battery results in the first weekish, things are still settling in and winding down, I tell ppl to give it between 3 and 5 full battery cycles before recording any battery data, I'm on embryo right now and when I first flashed I got like 7hrs total, after a week I'm getting 17hrs plus, sometimes 4hrs or more screen on time, jellybam v9.2 has a great working photosphere, I flashed that today and its working good, yes that status bar widget is tricky lol, good luck with finding what u want, if u need it I have my db link with just about every rom created for the herc for easy access lol
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

Stock vs cyanogen mod roms

Guys share your experience on stock roms and cm roms...
My view:
Stock has multiwindow support , better apps, better camera quality, has dual sim support and no customization and has to stick with one but exposed modules somehow it works.
Cm roms has better graphics on some games , better customization , has better ram management, single sim support and has poor camera and no multiwindow support with some app compatibility issue.
Guys share your things so that other guys will not get confused to choose which Rom they want to use...:beer::beer:
Sent from my GT-I9082 using Tapatalk now Free
drganbds said:
Guys share your experience on stock roms and cm roms...
My view:
Stock has multiwindow support , better apps, better camera quality and no customization and has to stick with one but exposed modules somehow it works.
Cm roms has better graphics on some games , better customization , has better ram managementand has poor camera and no multiwindow support with some app compatibility issue.
Guys share your things so that other guys will not get confused to choose which Rom they want to use...:beer::beer:
Sent from my GT-I9082 using Tapatalk now Free
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
from my idea.....first thing ...as stock is limited to 4.2.2 only while cm has got 4.4.2(thanks to devs)
now camera u can consider as drawback!
customisation is cool
now main thing yoiu talked about multiwinddow feature!ya its not there....but wait for sometime and let carbon roms fully arrive(with halo) and other halo roms...thats actually a cool feature if i say!
as all games bugs are fixed , cm based are better!
but if u want all fancy thing!then its not a good cupcake for u...its simple and performansive! and trust me!one day you will get tired of tw things
for me...cm based things are amazing!
i never used multiwindow dat much except showoff times mahn!!! or cut and paste thing!!!!!!
eats alot of ram !!! but so looks attractive!
raghavsharmaxda said:
from my idea.....first thing ...as stock is limited to 4.2.2 only while cm has got 4.4.2(thanks to devs)
now camera u can consider as drawback!
customisation is cool
now main thing yoiu talked about multiwinddow feature!ya its not there....but wait for sometime and let carbon roms fully arrive(with halo) and other halo roms...thats actually a cool feature if i say!
as all games bugs are fixed , cm based are better!
but if u want all fancy thing!then its not a good cupcake for u...its simple and performansive! and trust me!one day you will get tired of tw things
for me...cm based things are amazing!
i never used multiwindow dat much except showoff times mahn!!! or cut and paste thing!!!!!!
eats alot of ram !!! but so looks attractive!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agree dude and I'm on cm11 only and I love its fast smooth responsiveness and smooth gaming with improved graphics.
Sent from my GT-I9082 using Tapatalk now Free
Opened the recents app window... CM11 uses only 280MB without any background app. Stock ROM uses 70-80% of RAM on idle.
Opened Atutu and ran a benchmark... stock gets about 6500, while CM11 gets double of that, 11500 to 12000. CM is just muuuchh faster.
CM camera is worse than stock. Basically no software optimization like what you found on Samsung's camera.
For people who bought Grand for its dual SIM support, well, in my opinion it's useless because it drains so much battery... so I felt no regret when moving to CM11 with its only single sim support
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Navigation keys are available on cm 11 with easy enable method whereas its painful on stock...HD games are really smooth on cm.
Sent from my GT-I9082 using Tapatalk now Free
Right now on carbon rom......previously was on slimbean 4.2.2..never have bothered to switch back to stock.......was always aware of the pros and cons.but the pros outweigh the cons actually...........its a BIG relief after using these cm roms....we hope our respected developers would keep thier good work for making and updating these roms in future also..............
personally i dont use dual sim anyways but many ppl here are requesting for dual sim support in cm roms.........we can only keep our fingers crossed ...the day these roms offer dual sim facility..........just imagine.dual sim in cm roms on grand.............:good:
skpadhi79 said:
Right now on carbon rom......previously was on slimbean 4.2.2..never have bothered to switch back to stock.......was always aware of the pros and cons.but the pros outweigh the cons actually...........its a BIG relief after using these cm roms....we hope our respected developers would keep thier good work for making and updating these roms in future also..............
personally i dont use dual sim anyways but many ppl here are requesting for dual sim support in cm roms.........we can only keep our fingers crossed ...the day these roms offer dual sim facility..........just imagine.dual sim in cm roms on grand.............:good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yae but dual sim is hard to get on aosp ROMs and nice if we get it...
Guys share your gaming experience in cm ROMs.
Sent from my GT-I9082 using Tapatalk now Free
Guys one thing I can differentiate that stock based ROMs has more fonts legibility and clarity screen than cm ROMs even with 240 DPI on both isn't it?
Sent from my GT-I9082 using Tapatalk now Free
Stock Rom has better internet speed as far than cm roms.
Sent from my GT-I9082 using Tapatalk now Free
Is calling function working on cm11? if not which cm version has it?
Both cm 10.1 and cm 11 has calling function...if you are on 4.1.2 base then go for cm 10.1 if you are on 4.2.2 base go for cm 11.
Sent from my GT-I9082 using Tapatalk now Free
Stock ROMs has better audio quality on both music and clear call volumes than cm ROMs which has descend quality and low volume on voice calling.
Sent from my GT-I9082 using Tapatalk now Free
Just installed CM 11..... must say super smooth... very fast!!
its illogical to say that!!!
screeen clarity is same on 240 dpi as that of stock!!!
just that over voo doo thing is no more
fonts are externally avalable if u really look into threads and especially for 4.4.2 , chotu has done it a an extent!
just tw features arent there................
---------- Post added at 04:37 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:31 PM ----------
drganbds said:
Stock ROMs has better audio quality on both music and clear call volumes than cm ROMs which has descend quality and low volume on voice calling.
Sent from my GT-I9082 using Tapatalk now Free
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
audio quality are same(FYI, samsung dont use any special dolby mobile thingy or anything like that, )
first rule if u install non stock roms
1. always read every single thread and conversation , DO GOOGLE AND CHECK IF WHAT YOU ARE SAYING IS ACTUALLY TRUE OR NOT!
and ya...about cm's music, its same as stock mahn! its all about device capacity and few libaries for sound which are almost common in every roms(based on simple codes of android for output), rest is on hardware and limitations!
try some sound enhancers, tweak a little, search a lil, and you will get it what i am saying ! no offence mahn! sorry if rude ,dont mean to!
raghavsharmaxda said:
its illogical to say that!!!
screeen clarity is same on 240 dpi as that of stock!!!
just that over voo doo thing is no more
fonts are externally avalable if u really look into threads and especially for 4.4.2 , chotu has done it a an extent!
just tw features arent there................
---------- Post added at 04:37 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:31 PM ----------
audio quality are same(FYI, samsung dont use any special dolby mobile thingy or anything like that, )
first rule if u install non stock roms
1. always read every single thread and conversation , DO GOOGLE AND CHECK IF WHAT YOU ARE SAYING IS ACTUALLY TRUE OR NOT!
and ya...about cm's music, its same as stock mahn! its all about device capacity and few libaries for sound which are almost common in every roms(based on simple codes of android for output), rest is on hardware and limitations!
try some sound enhancers, tweak a little, search a lil, and you will get it what i am saying ! no offence mahn! sorry if rude ,dont mean to!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my GT-I9082 using Tapatalk now Free
Guys why do you prefer cm based roms over stock? Please do share all
Sent from my GT-I9082 using Tapatalk now Free
drganbds said:
Guys why do you prefer cm based roms over stock? Please do share all
Sent from my GT-I9082 using Tapatalk now Free
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Personally i have felt cm roms have satisfied me better than stock roms on every count ( except DUAL SIM -- glaring ommission... which i m not using....but on the other way its only due to samsung releasing grand and we are using it and developers are working on it so that we are getting the taste of these roms...otherwise can we imagine 4.4.2 stock on grand so soon.....
was on slimbean 4.2.2 earlier and all gameloft games wrer compatible ahich earlier was not....isnt it....
skpadhi79 said:
Personally i have felt cm roms have satisfied me better than stock roms on every count ( except DUAL SIM -- glaring ommission... which i m not using....but on the other way its only due to samsung releasing grand and we are using it and developers are working on it so that we are getting the taste of these roms...otherwise can we imagine 4.4.2 stock on grand so soon.....
was on slimbean 4.2.2 earlier and all gameloft games wrer compatible ahich earlier was not....isnt it....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What about in terms of stable and compatibility? Do you get satisfied with cm?
Sent from my GT-I9082 using Tapatalk now Free
drganbds said:
Guys why do you prefer cm based roms over stock? Please do share all
Sent from my GT-I9082 using Tapatalk now Free
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
One word... performance.
Owning a not-so-fast device such as Grand requires a fast ROM... It's better to lose some gimmicky Samsung features rather than suffer the lags. And Samsung is widely known for their bloated Touchwiz. The dual SIM is a worthy trade-off for me. :good:
naufalhadyan said:
One word... performance.
Owning a not-so-fast device such as Grand requires a fast ROM... It's better to lose some gimmicky Samsung features rather than suffer the lags. And Samsung is widely known for their bloated Touchwiz. The dual SIM is a worthy trade-off for me. :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
agreed.....hundred percent.......after switching to cm...never looked back to stock.....if only TW had been a little lighter......

[Suggestion] Stable ROM for Xperia S 4.4?

Hei guys,
Most probably this question has been asked already, but since then more updates had been followed.
I'm running a FreeXperia 4.1.2 ROM on my Xperia S, and I would like to change to a newer version (preferable 4.4.x) that is fitting a day-by-day use. What would you recommend me?
andrei10 said:
Hei guys,
Most probably this question has been asked already, but since then more updates had been followed.
I'm running a FreeXperia 4.1.2 ROM on my Xperia S, and I would like to change to a newer version (preferable 4.4.x) that is fitting a day-by-day use. What would you recommend me?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If You want extremely stable, go for Mokee. We still have official support from it. Second most stable according to Me is Carbon, but it has less frequent updates.
mokee?
Don't u have force closes ?
I think crDROID is most stable if your looking for KitKat rom
Never-ever use CrDroid for daily-use, it's kinda nice rom although you'll get alot (well, a few but still) of random reboots, it has very much customization options but with cost of stability.
Carbon Rom was quite nice 4.4.4 but the battery lasts half day with it...so it's also bad idea to use it.
I also used AOSPX, Paranoid, CM 11 and Mokee but can't say much about them because they were on my XS only for a few minutes - didn't liked any of them but I've heard much good things about AOSPX so you can try that one.
Otherwise I don't recommend any 4.4 roms, better stick to 4.1
I would recommend using PA or Carbon, both are stable ROMs of 4.4.4 for Xperia S. Carbon has more customization than PA, but PA is like semi-lollipop. Both give you 721 MB of RAM against 621 MB of stock JB.
A6ekAK said:
Never-ever use CrDroid for daily-use, it's kinda nice rom although you'll get alot (well, a few but still) of random reboots, it has very much customization options but with cost of stability.
Carbon Rom was quite nice 4.4.4 but the battery lasts half day with it...so it's also bad idea to use it.
I also used AOSPX, Paranoid, CM 11 and Mokee but can't say much about them because they were on my XS only for a few minutes - didn't liked any of them but I've heard much good things about AOSPX so you can try that one.
Otherwise I don't recommend any 4.4 roms, better stick to 4.1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AOSPX works very well. Only problem is you can't use your phone for calling. Oops.
Call volume does not do anything AND the other end can't hear you. So if you don't want to talk with anyone it's afine rom
Barleyman said:
AOSPX works very well. Only problem is you can't use your phone for calling. Oops.
Call volume does not do anything AND the other end can't hear you. So if you don't want to talk with anyone it's afine rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have no such problems with AOSPX
Sent from my LT26i using XDA Free mobile app
[email protected] said:
I have no such problems with AOSPX
Sent from my LT26i using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good for you but it doesn't do much for me.
And for the record, I just had to completely wipe my XS so it's not likely that either.
I guess I'll give PA a shot and if it won't work, I'll go back to 4.1. I'n any case I'm just using the phone as for a 2nd sim card to pick up calls and little else. Stock rom has this aggravating bug with PIN codes where the android phone will keep on crashing, so..
The best overall rom so far
For me the smoothest,fastest and most stable is the carbon rom build 20140808-1848
Also customization options available... try it you wont regret it...
I experienced crdroid, it's a great rom but has some bugs and reboots a few times in a day. I have been using CARBON rom (20141103 build) for 3 weeks, and I'm very happy with it. It's very stable for me.
Well, Paranoid android v4.4.4 also had the same very low voice problem in-call. At least the other guys can hear ME but I can't really hear THEM. I also grabbed the low voice fix and installed it but it didn't help.
I think I'll check the OpenSEMC-U 10.1 now, lots of people seem to like it. (that's 4.2)
Nope, same problem. 4.2.2 CM10.1 has very very low volume in-call as well. And, yes, I did wipe, install new kernel blah bloody blah blah.
*sigh* I guess it's back to the official "android phone has stopped" firmware :crying:
Try LP nAOSP or AOSP, they are better then 4.4

Custom ROM recommendation, lollipop

I've tried AICP and XenonHD, but they have some bugs and lag(on my HOX) except on performance governor.
Is there any "cleaner" ROM, like AOSP or CM12.1?
I saw CM12.1(unofficial), is it good?
Thanks in advance.
Shaumaaa said:
I've tried AICP and XenonHD, but they have stupid bugs and it's annoying when you read "STABLE", "SMOOTH" and stuff like that and after installation, you get lag(except on performance governor).
Is there any CLEAN ROM, not full of .... like changing notification bar color(just example)?
AOSP? I couldn't find any.
I saw CM12.1(unofficial), is it good?
Thanks in advance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First of all don't post in two different section it is enoght to post only on one place.
Second one no body will say this rom is better then anather, have few roms based on lolipop try them all and take decision for you wich one is better. And don't be anger for this where you don't like some roms the dev's work free for this roms and you are not happy. Yes the roms are stable for daily use and some people like AICP and XenonHD, others like SlimLP or Resurection Remix, other CM12.1 or FlexOS, Pac ROM too. You install two you heave to install more 5 and take decision. If you are not happy with lolipop you can try KitKat if you are not happy with them too, then go back to JellyBean if not happy with them flash stock rom, if not happy with stock buy a new phone with Marshmallow.
Thant said:
First of all don't post in two different section it is enoght to post only on one place.
Second one no body will say this rom is better then anather, have few roms based on lolipop try them all and take decision for you wich one is better. And don't be anger for this where you don't like some roms the dev's work free for this roms and you are not happy. Yes the roms are stable for daily use and some people like AICP and XenonHD, others like SlimLP or Resurection Remix, other CM12.1 or FlexOS, Pac ROM too. You install two you heave to install more 5 and take decision. If you are not happy with lolipop you can try KitKat if you are not happy with them too, then go back to JellyBean if not happy with them flash stock rom, if not happy with stock buy a new phone with Marshmallow.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First of all, thank you for your answer.
Second, I respect everything devs have done for the community but I don't like when they say "smooth" when it isn't. Also, I'm raping the "thanks" button whether I like the ROM or not. I tried these because they seemed the most popular.
Third, I'm not expecting stuff to work like on S6 for eg. but just working normal would be enough.(Had HD2 with jellybean, I know what is patience). I'm not even mad for those options, I like them. But if they cause stability issues, why adding them..
Fourth, if you read, you would see I apologized for posting in "General" and wrote for mods to delete it.
I guess I'll try Resurrection.
Have you tried CM12.1?
EDIT: My first post was a little bit rude. Changed it now. I was angry when my phone got stuck while trying to play Youtube video in HD.
Shaumaaa said:
First of all, thank you for your answer.
Second, I respect everything devs have done for the community but I don't like when they say "smooth" when it isn't. Also, I'm raping the "thanks" button whether I like the ROM or not. I tried these because they seemed the most popular.
Third, I'm not expecting stuff to work like on S6 for eg. but just working normal would be enough.(Had HD2 with jellybean, I know what is patience). I'm not even mad for those options, I like them. But if they cause stability issues, why adding them..
Fourth, if you read, you would see I apologized for posting in "General" and wrote for mods to delete it.
I guess I'll try Resurrection.
Have you tried CM12.1?
EDIT: My first post was a little bit rude. Changed it now. I was angry when my phone got stuck while trying to play Youtube video in HD.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No I didn't try CM12.1 but some people say it is good. Try SlimLP too, Pac Rom is new too the thread is before few days it is new in the ONE X forum. Just try them all and maybe you will find the best rom for you. I am on JB because I need realy stable phone because of my job 24/7,and good battery life, only today I have 180 min call time. With KitKat and LP roms have big battery drain and this is know bug. I will see the new Marshmallow release how is going, hope @teemo will make it perfect for us.:fingers-crossed:

Categories

Resources