Develop Bugs

G2 gets 3000 on Quadrant?!

http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=839687
How can we get a kernel to compare to this?! Holy hell!

thats in-freaking-sane that thing isn't made to run those speeds can't wait for the first my G2 caught fire stories because of this i mean come on 1.9 ghz and no real cooling basically means i'm cooking my processor

Brutus2TheMax said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=839687
How can we get a kernel to compare to this?! Holy hell!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got 2800 on my EVO using CM6.1 RC1 with snap7.6 turbo kernel and thats running at 1.2 GHz. There is a new Snap kernel coming out too (Snap9). Quadrant should be close to or at 3000 with that new kernel.

1.9GHz is soooooooooo fast holy titties

how in the world do you overclock a cpu 225%?

clock speed means nothing, its just a number.
my x2 athlon at 3.2ghz wont compare to a current 2ghz, im happy for them they were able to clock it that high but benchmarks will show real world results
I couldnt be happier with my evo regardless of what others can do with their phones

Brutus2TheMax said:
1.9GHz is soooooooooo fast holy titties
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was informed at the store that the G2 is a next generation Snapdragon than what the EVO has and thus can be mad overclocked. However to achieve those speeds I promise they aren't running stock voltages. And yeah, they are close to cooking that baby.
Amazing that Amazon had the G2 for FREE with new service the other day.
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk

It is easy to FaKE the scores lol!!!! Anyways it just a number and really dont mean much. I yet to really see a video of these number being legitament!!!

Fly like a G2

Holy BALLS. They OC'd that thing a whole 1.1Ghz... That's insane. I would NOT want to push that processor that hard though. That's reducing the life of the phone by a very significant amount, especially considering how these phones have such crap heat dissipation.

cnstarz said:
how in the world do you overclock a cpu 225%?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How, because the G2 is already underclocked down from 1.2GHz for battery saving reasons. Really only a 50% increase, which is still substantial as the EVO only overclocks 20%. You can't actually run it that high though, you can run it at around 1.45GHz, so its back at that 20%.
Also, my friend's HD2 hits 3500 in quadrant on the DesireHD rom. It hits 2000 underclocked at 500 MHz. He is running android off a class 6 card, but thats still some crazy scores. So our phones can hit that too if someone much smarter than me has some free time.

Good benchmarks

Hey guys I hear a lot of negative stuff about how smooth the GN isn't and how the hardware is not that good but I must say that after 6 months of SGS2 use with many awesome roms like Checkrom etc and overclocking to 1600Mhz running a lot of benchmark tests I have to say that my experience with the GN has been awesome. Its smooth, fast and pretty.
But I saved all my Antutu, Nenamark and Quadrant scores and i have done a series of scores with the GN trying different roms and kernels and I say that the results, even only clocked to 1350Mhz were on average above my old SGS2. We should consider how much more effort is required to use the resolution of the screen to produce 6800 scores on Antutu and 3000+ scores on Quadrant.
This phone is really the next logical step and I actually get it why Google went down this path.

robt772000 said:
Hey guys I hear a lot of negative stuff about how smooth the GN isn't and how the hardware is not that good but I must say that after 6 months of SGS2 use with many awesome roms like Checkrom etc and overclocking to 1600Mhz running a lot of benchmark tests I have to say that my experience with the GN has been awesome. Its smooth, fast and pretty.
But I saved all my Antutu, Nenamark and Quadrant scores and i have done a series of scores with the GN trying different roms and kernels and I say that the results, even only clocked to 1350Mhz were on average above my old SGS2. We should consider how much more effort is required to use the resolution of the screen to produce 6800 scores on Antutu and 3000+ scores on Quadrant.
This phone is really the next logical step and I actually get it why Google went down this path.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice to see a positive post for once.

Sweet as mate
I started a benchmark scores thread in general.
If you dont mind, can you post your ROM + Kernel and any OC/UV settings u applied.
Also, have u used CF-Bench and what was your score?

Cheers. Its big ie oc to 1350Mhz with Franco kernal.

[Q] Extremely low quadrant score. What do i do?

Okay, so the other day, i ran quadrant on my gs2 against my brohters gs4g and i got 3259 and my brother got 938. I tried again today, and i got 1208 and the gs4g got 1190. i ran the test seversl times and the same result, nothing more than 1300. I didn't change anything from the first time i ran the test, so is my phone messed up? I know most people don't really like quadrant, but i use it because it kind of gives me peace of mind knowing my phone is better thssn everyone else's

Don't worry about it. It really doesnt matter.
Sent From The Best Phone of 2011

Reboot your phone then wait for about 30 seconds while everything settles (dont run any other apps) then run quadrant. What score did you get this time?

I tried the reboot thing after the first low score and pretty much the same score
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk

kkg720 said:
I tried the reboot thing after the first low score and pretty much the same score
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would just throw it out the window bro.......thats too low to be in hand.

KillaHurtz said:
I would just throw it out the window bro.......thats too low to be in hand.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hilarious man
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk

kkg720 said:
Okay, so the other day, i ran quadrant on my gs2 against my brohters gs4g and i got 3259 and my brother got 938. I tried again today, and i got 1208 and the gs4g got 1190. i ran the test seversl times and the same result, nothing more than 1300. I didn't change anything from the first time i ran the test, so is my phone messed up? I know most people don't really like quadrant, but i use it because it kind of gives me peace of mind knowing my phone is better thssn everyone else's
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quadrant doesnt go well with Dual Core Snapdragon Processors. I've been getting 2000 each time a ran it. Try ANTUTU Benchmark and see what you get.
Quandrant doesnt define a phone of how great your phone is.

Or CF bench works well!
SGSII T989~ juggernaut v4.1~synergy v0.10

Quadrant is a horribly outdated benchmark, don't rely on it ever.
-Sent from my Droid 2-

iExpliziT said:
Quadrant doesnt go well with Dual Core Snapdragon Processors. I've been getting 2000 each time a ran it. Try ANTUTU Benchmark and see what you get.
Quandrant doesnt define a phone of how great your phone is.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll take what AnTuTu Benchmark gave me.. Listed me at 6327... Just over the Nexus ;-)
Main thing that brought me down as my stupid SD card because I have some generic piece of junk --- EDIT: Just ran it against the internal SD, and I got 6577. Even above the Galaxy Note ;-)

I know that quadrant is not optimized for dual core, but that doesnt explain why i was getting 3000+ and it just dropped to less than 1000
Btw antutu was 6492 idk if thats good or bad so...
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk

Freeze Google maps with titanium back up and see what u get ...
Sent from my EVO 3D Running Ganii's ICS

maek_it_happen said:
Freeze Google maps with titanium back up and see what u get ...
Sent from my EVO 3D Running Ganii's ICS
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maps is really that big of a culprit?
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

These threads get so old. Does everything work on your phone? Is it smooth and responsive? Then who cares what some outdated benchmark says. You are the benchmark.

I changed the rom on my friend's mytouch 4g and he scored 3246 on miui oc to 1.6 ghz lagfree, It beat my gs2 running zombie oc to 1.72 ghz lagfree 2976 i dont think quadrant is an accurate benchmark at all, so markus is right, YOU are the benchmark.

What's your Quadrant score?

I use Modaco IR12 with franco.Kernel overclocked to 1384.
I get a quadrant score around 3400 which I thought was pretty good.
Until a friend of mine upgraded his Galaxy SII to ICS and now gets around 4000 running stock...
What is your score?
Why is mine so "low"?

kmoon said:
I use Modaco IR12 with franco.Kernel overclocked to 1384.
I get a quadrant score around 3400 which I thought was pretty good.
Until a friend of mine upgraded his Galaxy SII to ICS and now gets around 4000 running stock...
What is your score?
Why is mine so "low"?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I havent run it on this phone, but my last phone got just over 4000 in Quadrant. Anywhere between 4000 and 4100

Because we have a huge screen.
And an outdated gpu.
Both of which I knew when buying the phone...and you should have too.
The Nexus is a software running beast.
That should be why you own it...not for it's tech specs (at least to some degree).
Also, quadrant scores have absolutely no impact on how well the phone performs.
Compare the two against each other and see which one lags less...
(Although this may be hard...the SII is an excellent phone as well).

The highest score I've hit was 2999 with Manhattan IC112 and franco.kernel with the CPU OCd to 1600 MHz

Because Exynos just destroys any other SoC out there really. Yes the GPU is outdated, but this phone is for enjoyment of pure AOSP, and runs smooth enough. Don't even worry about benches breh.

It....it's......it's....OVER 9000!

vitroid said:
The highest score I've hit was 2999 with Manhattan IC112 and franco.kernel with the CPU OCd to 1600 MHz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You sir, are a failure.
OCd to 1600 and only benched 2999?
Are you in the right forum?
Sent from the future.

i scored a 1.

Quoting Herman I'm scoring over 9000 too, sorry everyone.

sorry everyone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not, my result just says: "You have and always will score exactly 1 point more that everybody else does!"

SocialReject said:
You sir, are a failure.
OCd to 1600 and only benched 2999?
Are you in the right forum?
Sent from the future.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
....You call him a failure?
You judged someone on their Quadrant value...

adrynalyne said:
....You call him a failure?
You judged someone on their Quadrant value...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hey my quadrant score of 1 is the best.. means i'm #1 right?

Usually score around here...

for some odd reason i cant get pass 2030 on my galaxy nexus on stock 4.0.4. is anyone else having these scores? i know they dont mean much but most people i thought got much higher then 2030.

I really don't think benchmarks tell you what you're phone really is capable of, only what it yields though stress tests, and Quadrant scores can be faked.
I got slightly over 3000 with awesome IO scores using AOKP Milestone 5.

Theshawty said:
I really don't think benchmarks tell you what you're phone really is capable of, only what it yields though stress tests, and Quadrant scores can be faked.
I got slightly over 3000 with awesome IO scores using AOKP Milestone 5.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When did they released AOKP Milestone 5? D: i was waiting for it... And max i could get with francos kernel Milestone 3 ocd 1344 and AOKP Milestone 4 was lil over 3k =/
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

msedek said:
When did they released AOKP Milestone 5? D: i was waiting for it... And max i could get with francos kernel Milestone 3 ocd 1344 and AOKP Milestone 4 was lil over 3k =/
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It was released earlier today.
I just ran the quadrant, with AOKP M5 + Lean 3.30, got 2606 on quadrant, no OC.

franciscofranco said:
Quoting Herman I'm scoring over 9000 too, sorry everyone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha Franco your kernel is awesome.

Just ran Quadrant and got a 3186, not too bad. Using Liquid 1.4 at 1228 mhz, Franco kernal.
I think my OG Droid overclocked got around 990, or just over 1000.

Also getting about 2000. I'm not concerned about the GPU subscores, but what about that I/O score? It's very very low compared to all other devices. I guess this would change with a custom ROM like CM9?

ics overclocked!

this is just for those who wish to see a bit more snappyness in your ics....
First i have no idea if this will work on all roms, but im using the PHANTOM rom ( 4.0.4 ) and using the tergat paid version.. im using the kernal that came cooked into the rom....
i just loaded the overclock module, and set it to 1.54Ghz.. i did not change the voltages at all..
doing this i saw an increase in about +200 points testing with antutu benchmark...
im advance i apologize for wasting fourm space but just figured since i havent seen anything on overclocking ics yet, id just show how i did it..
just something to tinker with..

There are threads and this has been discussed before. Thanks for trying though.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2

of course.... always a thread mixed within the 1000s out there.
one thing i noticed is on the antutu it shows where people have post thier results... how on earth are some of them overclocking to 1.9ghz and 1.75hz.. scoring soooooo high?! for example im at 1.452ghz scoring say 7200-7300 and some are at 1.452 scoring 12000-15000... seems kinda high to me...
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda app-developers app

chris-allen said:
of course.... always a thread mixed within the 1000s out there.
one thing i noticed is on the antutu it shows where people have post thier results... how on earth are some of them overclocking to 1.9ghz and 1.75hz.. scoring soooooo high?! for example im at 1.452ghz scoring say 7200-7300 and some are at 1.452 scoring 12000-15000... seems kinda high to me...
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lets just say they are ways to cheat the benchmark test. I never did and not sure exactly how to but I know I have seen people talking about it.

ace0603 said:
Lets just say they are ways to cheat the benchmark test. I never did and not sure exactly how to but I know I have seen people talking about it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've never understood why someone would want to fake a already meaningless benchmark number. It screams I'm over compensating
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda app-developers app

i agree..i was just wanting to overclock. little to sed if it would make some of the ics Roms any snappier.. Alot of Ics is being released on quad core phones and phones with slightly snapier processors.. but i thought taking my 1.2ghz to say 1.4ghZ would polish the speeds of ics on my phone.. well and it does!! just gotta use tegrak..
seems like 1.452 is the best.. im not good on messing with voltages so i stay away from too much change. seems lime @ 1.4 i get a 200-400 point increase, but at 1.6ghz it seems to decrease 200-250points and 1.7ghz locks up 1/2 way through the benchmark..
got me.. i just like tinkering around with it... i tried it on calkulins El29 rom and holy **** it screams!!!

chris-allen said:
i agree..i was just wanting to overclock. little to sed if it would make some of the ics Roms any snappier.. Alot of Ics is being released on quad core phones and phones with slightly snapier processors.. but i thought taking my 1.2ghz to say 1.4ghZ would polish the speeds of ics on my phone.. well and it does!! just gotta use tegrak..
seems like 1.452 is the best.. im not good on messing with voltages so i stay away from too much change. seems lime @ 1.4 i get a 200-400 point increase, but at 1.6ghz it seems to decrease 200-250points and 1.7ghz locks up 1/2 way through the benchmark..
got me.. i just like tinkering around with it... i tried it on calkulins El29 rom and holy **** it screams!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Keep in mind that most of the newer phones being released in the US are still dual core. I believe the reason for this is for the LTE support. And even single core phones can run ICS without much of a hickup so I wouldnt worry too much about overclocking just to gain some performance in ICS. The devs are working hard to tune it up. Just follow Phantoms thread. And I am sure once we get the official release and/or source drops we will see even greater performance tweaks done to ICS for our phone. Its just a time game....