Develop Bugs

Quadrant standard question?

Is a 1767 good on a g2?

Also got an 1898 when I took off my live wallpaper

I hit about 2100 or so...depends on whats running
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA App

You'll hear a million times from a million folks that Quadrant scored are meaningless. You can have a stellar score and a buggy ass ROM or an average score and a great smooth experience with your ROM. Just gotta use what works best for you and if that also means high Quad score cool. When I OC to 1.8, I get over 2500, but it sucks my battery like a filthy back alley hooker.
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA App

Bahahaha "back alley hooker" that's a slice of fried gold.
Sent using "a series of tubes"

Gotcha, im running virtuous 1.0 with advanced kernel(virtuous as well) OC'd to 998mhz.

TJBunch1228 said:
You'll hear a million times from a million folks that Quadrant scored are meaningless. You can have a stellar score and a buggy ass ROM or an average score and a great smooth experience with your ROM. Just gotta use what works best for you and if that also means high Quad score cool. When I OC to 1.8, I get over 2500, but it sucks my battery like a filthy back alley hooker.
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
my battery life isnt good in general, barely get's me half way through the day, and that's with following the other thread stating to delete the sense account and all.

So this is me at 1.8ghz a little while ago. Found out that if I run it set to "Performance" in SetCPU I get stellar speed, but as soon as my screen shuts off it won't come back on. Need to do a battery pull or hold down power for like 10 seconds to reboot. Eh, such is life.

@tjbunch
Here's my solution for that problem. In the setcpu profiles, make a profile for screen off and set the speeds to as low as possible. Like 245/245... ever since I did that I've never had that problem again. Hope it helps.
Edit: don't forget to set priority to the highest on that profile.
Sent using "a series of tubes"

T989 Quadrant scores

I have seen the videos showing 3800 scores. I bought 2 of these today and i can not get above 2700. Anyone have any suggestions?

My first two were 3300, third time 2800.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using XDA App

Quadrant doesn't matter!

its the GPU on our dual core snapdragons that lag behind the other exynous cpu-equipped sgs2 variants. Unless you're a hardcore gamer these numbers are meaningless. Other than that this phone does remarkably well in real world use.
Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk

on first run i hit 3500's

ryan562 said:
its the GPU on our dual core snapdragons that lag behind the other exynous cpu-equipped sgs2 variants. Unless you're a hardcore gamer these numbers are meaningless. Other than that this phone does remarkably well in real world use.
Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah, except you dont have snapdragons.... you have scorpion.

i hit 3400 on stores demo unit .scores will vary i usually just run three tests and see what the phone does that will give you a good idea

U Flippin Idiot said:
I have seen the videos showing 3800 scores. I bought 2 of these today and i can not get above 2700. Anyone have any suggestions?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, I got mine yesterday and figured out how to get past 3800. No mod/tweeks needed.
Proof is in the attachment.
Reboot phone -> end all processes -> Run Quadrant(4 - 5 times) generally the 4th or 5th one is the highest score.
I start from 3200-3300 and end up between 3700-3800.
I am also sure that with mods and better overclock you can possibly hit 4.5k

hiko007 said:
Yes, I got mine yesterday and figured out how to get past 3800. No mod/tweeks needed.
Proof is in the attachment.
Reboot phone -> end all processes -> Run Quadrant(4 - 5 times) generally the 4th or 5th one is the highest score.
I start from 3200-3300 and end up between 3700-3800.
I am also sure that with mods and better overclock you can possibly hit 4.5k
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your right. Rebooted ran it and hit 3200 then 3799.
I was more wondering on this. I actually love this phone but cannot believe they took the tethering and wifi calling out. Tethering I'm not worried about as soon as we have root we will get it.

Enzopreme said:
yeah, except you dont have snapdragons.... you have scorpion.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol smh. You seem to be uniformed. The snapdragon is the total package..the scorpion is the cpu core of the snapdragon
Sent from my SGH-T989 using XDA App

U Flippin Idiot said:
Your right. Rebooted ran it and hit 3200 then 3799.
I was more wondering on this. I actually love this phone but cannot believe they took the tethering and wifi calling out. Tethering I'm not worried about as soon as we have root we will get it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you sure about tethering and wifi hotspots? because I do see an option for it on my S2. I just tried it and the wifi hotspot does work aswell.
It is the pink icon called "Wifi Sharing".

greengoldmello said:
Lol smh. You seem to be uniformed. The snapdragon is the total package..the scorpion is the cpu core of the snapdragon
Sent from my SGH-T989 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Correct. The official name of the chip is Snapdragon S3.

The phone is all over the place with quadrant scores. My highest score has been 3801 with my lowest being around 2400.

Try cfbench it for dual core cpu's
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk

U Flippin Idiot said:
I have seen the videos showing 3800 scores. I bought 2 of these today and i can not get above 2700. Anyone have any suggestions?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got 3500 yesterday. So maybe like everyone else says quadrant doesn't matter? But it is still mild indicator of how your phone may be to me.
-Hercules grabbed my post, and threw it at your face to be read-

jongzor said:
The phone is all over the place with quadrant scores. My highest score has been 3801 with my lowest being around 2400.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Asynchronous that's why once someone gets the cores to take on task together instead of acting as an individual cpu you should get more stable quadrant scores. Quadrant does not if I'm correct no the difference between two cores or 1 core.

hiko007 said:
Are you sure about tethering and wifi hotspots? because I do see an option for it on my S2. I just tried it and the wifi hotspot does work aswell.
It is the pink icon called "Wifi Sharing".
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is there but when you go to it you get the notification for the upgrade to your account. It is not unlocked like most phones thru them.

yea games u can see it doesnt run well at all and i play alot of games like city jump u can see the frame rate being lost
---------- Post added at 07:48 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:43 PM ----------
I_am_Error said:
I got 3500 yesterday. So maybe like everyone else says quadrant doesn't matter? But it is still mild indicator of how your phone may be to me.
-Hercules grabbed my post, and threw it at your face to be read-
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it does matter other phones quadrant scores are not all over the place they are steddy and i shouldnt have to reboot my phone just to get a high score looks to me something is not working right with the phone i do see some lag playing 1080p videos in the web so maybe the developers can fix these problems

greengoldmello said:
lol smh. You seem to be uniformed. The snapdragon is the total package..the scorpion is the cpu core of the snapdragon
sent from my sgh-t989 using xda app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
. Lol

Just got one of these phones as well, unfortunately, I feel like home screen swipes with all alternatives and touch wiz are really laggy. Anyone else experiencing this? The scroll just seems to get jerky when you swipe. Really annoying.

Why are my Quadrant tests getting around 1400??

Any idea? Most reviews i saw for the GNex shows it getting 1700-2000+.
Meaningless or not, i wanna know why it's so much less.
Wtf

just4747 said:
Any idea? Most reviews i saw for the GNex shows it getting 1700-2000+.
Meaningless or not, i wanna know why it's so much less.
Wtf
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I checked it right when I got the phone for the hell of it and got around the same number. The only thing I care about is if it will lag with daily use. If it doesn't I don't care if it has half a core and 1 byte of ram.

Quadrant scores are meaningless and don't give any indication of how the phone performs in real world use.
My old Galaxy S2 scored 4000+ in quadrant but does it feel 3 times faster than my Nexus definitely no!

Again, I don't care about what the test actually means but why are our scores so much lower on the same device compared to the reviews show? What is different and why? It leads me to believe that something is wrong.

I freaked too, but I think its bs. If you install System Monitor you can watch both CPU cores in action. Also, other bench tests clearly show that you're getting dual core performance. I think Quadrant will need an update.

just4747 said:
Again, I don't care about what the test actually means but why are our scores so much lower on the same device compared to the reviews show? What is different and why? It leads me to believe that something is wrong.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I get around 1400+ as well in quadrant and I don't think there is anything wrong as when I first got my GS2 my scores where lower than what was seen online from reviewers as well.
Don't forget they probably had a phone with no extra apps on it or just the bare minimum which could also affect the scores.

daleski75 said:
I get around 1400+ as well in quadrant and I don't think there is anything wrong as when I first got my GS2 my scores where lower than what was seen online from reviewers as well.
Don't forget they probably had a phone with no extra apps on it or just the bare minimum which could also affect the scores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got a 1700 reading from quadrant. I don't know if quadrant takes advantage of the dualcore cpu?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk

Herman76 said:
I got a 1700 reading from quadrant. I don't know if quadrant takes advantage of the dualcore cpu?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think it doesn't and it needs a desperate update anyway to fully support ICS.
Someone correct me if I am wrong about quadrant standard not seeing both cores?

It's the higher resolution mainly.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

crappy 2d performance

ive been wondering this for a while, ever seeing the 2d test in quadrant run slowly(to my eyes, at least) that whether or not this phone or the qualcomm chip has some issues with rendering stuff in 2d
as can be seen in this video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQ24BCfW3yw
both of the phones using the qualcomm chip doesnt even hit 30fps in 2d tests while the i9100 seem to hit 60 and gets capped there
i wonder if this is a driver issue or hardware issue, since not just our gs2 have this issue, but also the amaze, sensation and several other phones..
edit: here is the tmo gs2 vs sensation, same issue can be seen
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DM6sPTcFpAc
all 3 of these phones share a similar snapdragon processor, and the crappy 2d issue seems to spread around(in certain games downloaded off the market)

not sure if anyone is even interested in this topic. but for my own fun i went on youtube and looked up the xiaomi m1(uses similar processor) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TKOZKcA3VlY
seems like their phone doesnt have this issue
anyone have any insight to this?

Doesn't happened on the Skyrocket.
Faux has used the MDP drivers, that were apparently causing the lag, from the skyrocket, and ported them to the T-Mo SGS II.
From what I hear, it's fixed the lag.

Longcat14 said:
Doesn't happened on the Skyrocket.
Faux has used the MDP drivers, that were apparently causing the lag, from the skyrocket, and ported them to the T-Mo SGS II.
From what I hear, it's fixed the lag.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
im using the faux kernel, i get the same results
just give quadrant a try on the skyrocket, you'll see the 2d benchmark and it's fps not even hitting 30

adding to my post
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yMYMQZDoWHw
quadrant is the only thing i see that provides a 2d benchmark with fps on the bottom, and 2d stuff does seem fairly slow on our phone.

If you're not using beta kernel then your going to get lackluster results there is no lag stuttering in his kernel at all. Quadrant is not even a really good test at all. To test 2d. You need to keep in mind also that smp are vastly different from Asmp.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

AznDud333 said:
adding to my post
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yMYMQZDoWHw
quadrant is the only thing i see that provides a 2d benchmark with fps on the bottom, and 2d stuff does seem fairly slow on our phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh, Quadrant's 2D is bull****.
1. It's not made for the Adreno 220.
2. It doesn't make the GPU ramp up under load, so the GPU sits at whatever idle speeds are.
I forget what the app is called that really tests 2D, but I know passmark has a 2D test in their app, and I just did the test, and it did WELL over 50 FPS.

Quadrant is so outdated that I'm not sure why anyone puts stock in anything that piece of old junk says.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

Yeah i think Quadrant is a placebo enhancer. If a phone visually runs good ( I say visually because there is no doubt the hardware is physically capable of anything we throw at it,) then i could care less what number a program gives it...

Killbynature said:
If you're not using beta kernel then your going to get lackluster results there is no lag stuttering in his kernel at all. Quadrant is not even a really good test at all. To test 2d. You need to keep in mind also that smp are vastly different from Asmp.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
im using faux 07b4
and i guess it could be quadrant being outdated..i was just throwing my 2cents out.

AznDud333 said:
im using faux 07b4
and i guess it could be quadrant being outdated..i was just throwing my 2cents out.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My single core mytouch 4g can score 5000 in quadrant. So yeah. Try using a test like fps2d. From the looks of the little hardware information I can get out of it. This processor was optimized strictly for 3d performance. So any home that can use purely 3d should be considerably better performance.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

AznDud333 said:
im using faux 07b4
and i guess it could be quadrant being outdated..i was just throwing my 2cents out.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Edit: Never mind I was wrong.

+1 for fps2d. I was going to suggest that for testing. Or antutu
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk

Hey I just got my gs2 had a g2x quadrant means nothing my g2x score way higher but gs2 works better
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

corwest said:
Yeah i think Quadrant is a placebo enhancer. If a phone visually runs good ( I say visually because there is no doubt the hardware is physically capable of anything we throw at it,) then i could care less what number a program gives it...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
100% agree. Benchmarks do not equal real world use.

Please post your 3DMark Scores and configurations

Greetings!
Just curious about what you guys are getting and what ROM/Kernel and speeds you are using.
My best score is:
Normal: 4257 Extreme:3060
This is running 1.8Ghz and 800Mhz CPU (Perseus kernel). Amnospherum Rom.
With saber kernel I only get
Normal: 3065
Extreme: 2351
Running 1.92Ghz and GPU stock speed since the ocing is broken for the GPU.
Regards
UPDATE: 06/06/2013
Running AOSP Rom and Devil Kernel...new best score 5330! This is it for me

I got
Normal: 3572=hw3d.force tweak.
Extreme: 2712
Added build.prop: hw3d.force=1
Running skynote rom at 1.6 ghz
Kernel_perseus
this message was brought to you by,NOTE2SKYNOTE2.

My Samsung Galaxy Note II scored 2400 in the Ice Storm Extreme benchmark test. http://bit.ly/3dmark-android
My Samsung Galaxy Note II scored 3155 in the Ice Storm benchmark test. http://bit.ly/3dmark-android
Rom is bone stock UCAMA4...4.1.2....un-rooted.
Not bad !!
Well above average scores according to the comparisons.
I'd better run this for a while. ...g

I also get similar scores as you all, but the biggest factor is our GPU we are running a older version of drivers witch is 2.0 GL the nexus for example is running a 3.0 open GL.
It's also running 4.2 while I'm still at 4.1 not sure if that has anything to do with but on that 3d mark it gives you a graph. Processors at 11125, Graphics at 2356. I've seen the nexus graph at we beat the processor hands down our GPU in the other hand is found lacking. Nexus processor 9522 GPU 10119.
Not even sure if updating the GL version will help or its in the hardware.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 using xda app-developers app

Here is my very best and Quadrant of 8800 as well ...dont think I am getting much more of it without it burning down lol

Nice numbers
sent by my CARBON NOTE 2

shaolin95 said:
Here is my very best and Quadrant of 8800 as well ...dont think I am getting much more of it without it burning down lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Uh....yeh
Did it smoke at all when you ran that score ?...LOL....g

hahah not really...it does not even get that warm. Gosh I remember one day OCing my Captivate...that glass was about to explode..it was hard to touch it!

JDevil roms usually clock quads 8k+ stock with no kernel. Pictures all over his rom. Wish some of those guys would chime in. There was a few of like 8300 on 1st few pages and some of jeremyandroids other roms all around 9k and pictures. Just saying. You may would want to try his stuff if you enjoy high quads etc.

shaolin95 said:
hahah not really...it does not even get that warm. Gosh I remember one day OCing my Captivate...that glass was about to explode..it was hard to touch it!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The good old days of burning single and dual core chips. ..Lol
Fun stuff. ..g

Darn it, almost got the 5K mark to be happy

shaolin95 said:
Darn it, almost got the 5K mark to be happy
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow, that is a great score.
this message was brought to you by,NOTE2SKYNOTE2.

I thought I was done but I decided to post one last screenshot because with Avatar ROM and the Devil Kernl I am finally able to break the 5K barrier...heck even got 5200 on that last run!

The app is blatantly biased towards adreno gpus though... The Dev tried to say the adreno 220 is more powerful than ours, and that's why it typically gets a better score lol

crixley said:
The app is blatantly biased towards adreno gpus though... The Dev tried to say the adreno 220 is more powerful than ours, and that's why it typically gets a better score lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Saw that...lol
Funny people ...g

My best score so far, carbon ROM 1.6 ghz
Extreme ice storm

Thanks for sharing amigo!
I just did my best score an hour ago too

Nice!!

New best ice storm score carbon ROM 1.6ghz.

Liquidsmooth and Devil Kernel. [email protected] [email protected]
Care to share your specifics for devil? My physics suck.