Develop Bugs

AOKP M4 vs. CM9 Kang by winner

I've been using CM9 Kang by winner for a while now. I love it. Was thinking of switching over to AOKP M4 just to see if its better.
I'm using Franco's Kernel and I heard M4 is better than Stock AOKP.
Let me know your thoughts!
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA

AOKP FTW..!!!
I use AOKP since i get my Gnex and i can see their development speed which are amazingly fast.. If your interest are more on tweaks and extra features, i think better go for AOKP for now while waiting CM9 to release their milestone. I never flash CM9, i cant give much comment on their ROM. For kernel wise, i prefer Glados over Franco because Glados are more stable and problem free most of the time. Franco always implement features from Glados, sound like Glados is the master

Axi0m Crossbreed fo sho. =]

shadowstewie said:
I've been using CM9 Kang by winner for a while now. I love it. Was thinking of switching over to AOKP M4 just to see if its better.
I'm using Franco's Kernel and I heard M4 is better than Stock AOKP.
Let me know your thoughts!
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I will chime in here because I was in the same boat. However, I was using AOKP M4 w/ franco's kernel first. I read several posts/threads that stated how CM9 was smoother and faster than AOKP because of less features built-in.
I just flashed CM9 today w/ franco's kernel and I can definitely tell a difference - CM9 is the winner here. It only makes sense from the big picture. The CM guys know their poop - they've been developing ROMs far longer than any of these other guys.

My first rom that i flashed was winners CM9 Kang. Was very smooth. My only gripe was there were no mods for it. I switched over to AOKP and never looked back. Equally just as fast with tons of mods.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk

You can always use Boot Manager as well to compare different roms. Works nicely for me, sometimes has issues with certain roms.

nbeebe24 said:
To answer your question, aokp is rich with features for customization of almost every aspect of the from. As of now cyanogenmod is playing catch up. But I know it'll be amazing in a short time. Most people use aokp because it requires less work to add/subtract what you do or don't want.
CM has a great reputation, but right now its nearly stock. I am waiting to see what they come out with then I'll probably run it (as I have on my previous nexus'). It all comes down to what you're looking for. If you want features galore, aokp is the right choice. Just run it until CM9 gets rolling
Some of you really need to get off your high horse. Sarcastic and rude comments are totally unnecessary. What if your teachers in kindergarten and beyond told you to stop asking stupid questions? This is a place for learning, sharing, and growing not for ridiculing.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here here, well said.
I find myself switching back and forward between yhese two roms there both really good so i aint fonna say witch i think is best.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

My opinion is that, I will keep use AOKP M4 and not consider CM9 until there comes the stable version of CM9. Just for stability.

kalaexj said:
My opinion is that, I will keep use AOKP M4 and not consider CM9 until there comes the stable version of CM9. Just for stability.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM9 has been incredibly stable since the "experimental" builds. CM tends to have a different definition of "stable".

adrynalyne said:
This isn't rocket science. You try both and make an informed decision. Everyone values things differently. Others cannot make an informed decision for you.
Call it sarcastic or rude, if you want. I call it thinking for yourself, because nobody has unbiased or objective rom reviews. Its all fanboish nonsense.
Apple thrives off of those who don't want to make a decision themselves, by the way.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed, its not rocket science, but I just think people throughout these threads have been answering in unnecessarily rude ways. Just tell him the CM9 is minimal right now and AOKP has a lot of features. There's car references and all kinds of unneeded things going on in here
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

I just deleted over half the posts in this thread.......
It's simple. If you don't want to help or have anything helpful to say, back out of the thread and move on. I will only say this once.

mudferret said:
CM9 has been incredibly stable since the "experimental" builds. CM tends to have a different definition of "stable".
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But for the newbie who first time to hack my GN, I don't like the the word like 'Nightly' or 'Experiemental' in the version name. If there has some version of CM9 that's truly stable or stable enough, I think it should publish it as 'Milestone' or 'Stable'. This kinds of word are the only keyword for the people unfamiliar with CM9 to make decision to use or not, doesn't it? If so, I think I will believe the team and give a try if there's a stable version. Everybody know CM series have good reputation.

kalaexj said:
But for the newbie who first time to hack my GN, I don't like the the word like 'Nightly' or 'Experiemental' in the version name. If there has some version of CM9 that's truly stable or stable enough, I think it should publish it as 'Milestone' or 'Stable'. This kinds of word are the only keyword for the people unfamiliar with CM9 to make decision to use or not, doesn't it? If so, I think I will believe the team and give a try if there's a stable version. Everybody know CM series have good reputation.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the cm9 nightlies (experimental) are very very stable and good for daily use but,
like said in here before, they lack quite some of the extra features
if you're looking for rom's with more options try AOKP, Gummynex, Codename Android or any other rom you can find on xda ... they are all good roms which give you plenty of options.
it's all just a matter of personal taste in the end i guess
good luck and enjoy!

kalaexj said:
But for the newbie who first time to hack my GN, I don't like the the word like 'Nightly' or 'Experiemental' in the version name. If there has some version of CM9 that's truly stable or stable enough, I think it should publish it as 'Milestone' or 'Stable'. This kinds of word are the only keyword for the people unfamiliar with CM9 to make decision to use or not, doesn't it? If so, I think I will believe the team and give a try if there's a stable version. Everybody know CM series have good reputation.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I hear what you're saying; and I agree the nomenclature can strike fear into newbies.
Luckily with the GN there are a lot of good ROMs available; more quality options to choose from compared to other devices.

I'll find Apex rom very fast and very stable, with leankernel. He's only problem is that it's not update for a while, that could indicate an abandon from the dev. Instead, roman, from AOKP, is very dedicated and his rom growing fast and constantly

Edit: Meh, I'll just try them all!

Are ICS ROMs Ready

I am interested in going to ICS, but i want to know a real opinion on performance and stability. I really get irritated by bugs and performance slowness. So Are any of these ICS ROMs ready as a daily driver yet?

In my experience yes... reloaded is very good I have only had one issue with it.... and that is wifi dropped once.. but yes with the 3.0+ kernel they are awesome.

markmac said:
I am interested in going to ICS, but i want to know a real opinion on performance and stability. I really get irritated by bugs and performance slowness. So Are any of these ICS ROMs ready as a daily driver yet?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, because if you don't ask, all opinions given are fake...
That being said, the ROMs are as stable as they can be. Check changelog of ROMs and Kernels if you want to know the specific details.

markmac said:
I am interested in going to ICS, but i want to know a real opinion on performance and stability. I really get irritated by bugs and performance slowness. So Are any of these ICS ROMs ready as a daily driver yet?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree; they are ready in my opinion. I have been using ICS since the earliest releases for the Kindle. It's only been since Hashcode's 3.0 kernel release has ICS been "stable and functional" for many. There will be some bugs for a while and some functionality still unimplemented for some time to come I imagine. Having said that, I find the latest ICS Kindle ROMs very functional for daily use.

No,
There is still the charging issue which people have forgotten to mention. This is the biggest issue right now and one that bugs even me. Stay away until that is fixed.

ics roms
markmac said:
I am interested in going to ICS, but i want to know a real opinion on performance and stability. I really get irritated by bugs and performance slowness. So Are any of these ICS ROMs ready as a daily driver yet?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I installed gedeROM v 1.35 running the latest kernal 3.0 and it runs great. I havent noticed any bugs and it runs great. read the kernal 3.0 thread for list of current bugs.
---------- Post added at 01:01 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:00 PM ----------
Jessical said:
No,
There is still the charging issue which people have forgotten to mention. This is the biggest issue right now and one that bugs even me. Stay away until that is fixed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the charging bug has been fixed

Are any ICS or GB ROM wife ready??
I'm sure most know what I mean. I know there is some tech savvy girls here, but most of us tech guys have wives who are very untechnical, so if we give them something with a custom rom on it, it better be beyond stable. Us here can work through some bugs, but non-techies cant. I'd prefer ICS, but if there is some GB rom more stable than any of the ICS ROMs, i'll go with them.

leoingle said:
I'm sure most know what I mean. I know there is some tech savvy girls here, but most of us tech guys have wives who are very untechnical, so if we give them something with a custom rom on it, it better be beyond stable. Us here can work through some bugs, but non-techies cant. I'd prefer ICS, but if there is some GB rom more stable than any of the ICS ROMs, i'll go with them.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The gedeROM is very stable . Haven't found a single bug.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA

markmac said:
I am interested in going to ICS, but i want to know a real opinion on performance and stability. I really get irritated by bugs and performance slowness. So Are any of these ICS ROMs ready as a daily driver yet?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For different users have different issues but it's almost ready for daily use. I am using gede ROM and I like it.

markmac said:
I am interested in going to ICS, but i want to know a real opinion on performance and stability. I really get irritated by bugs and performance slowness. So Are any of these ICS ROMs ready as a daily driver yet?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 gedeROM
I am using this one as my daily driver. Slight kernel issues but nothing unbearable.
Wifi will drop (I have not experienced this).
Sound will drop (once in the past 10 days I had this happen) and reboot will fix (some say turning the screen off and on again but this did not work in the case that I experienced).
The charging issue... The light will come on and then turn off. I just let it sit on the charger as I sleep and when I return it is at 100%. That is enough confirmation that it charges for me.

Good news:bangprovn will start new project in cm10!!!

http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=29992622&postcount=217
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1790721&page=22
He or she said:
Sorry for discontinuing this project. I will start new project in cm10 so i dont have time to continue cm7 . Sorry again
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app
new update: he or she said: Will start to build on this sunday

Not to sound like an ass but honestly CM7 looks and feels really dated now and with a more stable CM9 for our phone and hopefully CM10 on the way I rather more effort is focused on ICS and JB ROMs rather than CM7 since we already have good GB ROMs for the SGW.

Just Another★Gamer said:
Not to sound like an ass but honestly CM7 looks and feels really dated now and with a more stable CM9 for our phone and hopefully CM10 on the way I rather more effort is focused on ICS and JB ROMs rather than CM7 since we already have good GB ROMs for the SGW.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you mean outdated? :laugh:

FelixAusChina said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=29992622&postcount=217
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1790721&page=22
He or she said:
Sorry for discontinuing this project. I will start new project in cm10 so i dont have time to continue cm7 . Sorry again
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
whoaa... really? hope for that become true. can't wait for that.

Just Another★Gamer said:
Not to sound like an ass but honestly CM7 looks and feels really dated now and with a more stable CM9 for our phone and hopefully CM10 on the way I rather more effort is focused on ICS and JB ROMs rather than CM7 since we already have good GB ROMs for the SGW.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not agree with you.
First, there is not a finished and stable CM rom and is not so good start with new projects at this point.
Why?
Because gingerbred on galaxy w is simply perfect and there is no reason or features in CM9 or in CM10 that justify porting and waste of resources and time.
I hope that someone will finish CM7 job.

willypt said:
Do you mean outdated? :laugh:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea, its early in the morning so its a little obvious i'll make mistakes.
kbytek said:
I'm not agree with you.
First, there is not a finished and stable CM rom and is not so good start with new projects at this point.
Why?
Because gingerbred on galaxy w is simply perfect and there is no reason or features in CM9 or in CM10 that justify porting and waste of resources and time.
I hope that someone will finish CM7 job.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well your welcome to disagree, i'm not forcing my opinion on you or anyone just stating what I think.
There is no finished CM ROM but stable I honestly think the latest CM9 build is stable for daily use and not so good, lol CM9 runs graphic heavy games a whole lot better than GB even when its OC.
Oh yes GB is much much smoother and better than ICS and JB, sigh. There are already good GB ROMs for the SGW so is it such a big deal that someone wants to drop making CM7 and start doing the newest CM10 for our phone its their choice and if I had skills I rather take my shot and making CM9 and CM10 for our phone better rather than stick with ye old CM7.

Just Another★Gamer said:
Yea, its early in the morning so its a little obvious i'll make mistakes.
Well your welcome to disagree, i'm not forcing my opinion on you or anyone just stating what I think.
There is no finished CM ROM but stable I honestly think the latest CM9 build is stable for daily use and not so good, lol CM9 runs graphic heavy games a whole lot better than GB even when its OC.
Oh yes GB is much much smoother and better than ICS and JB, sigh. There are already good GB ROMs for the SGW so is it such a big deal that someone wants to drop making CM7 and start doing the newest CM10 for our phone its their choice and if I had skills I rather take my shot and making CM9 and CM10 for our phone better rather than stick with ye old CM7.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed. I just can say, " go for the CM10". I want to live the future not the past...
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda premium

Actually, I'm supporting the development of CM9 and CM10 because 'in case of' the ROM becomes standard, I don't have to learn it.
Take an example of the ye old Win XP
Nowadays, Windows 7 has become the new standard of the computing world (of Windows, obviously).
Yes, you can still make Windows XP compatible program (with more cost and testing) , but can you assure that your program (which is made in .. say Win 7 with .NET Framework 3.5 / 4) could run w/o prob in Windows XP while your program works seamlessly in Win 7?
My point here is that we have to take measure on which ROM has brighter future? Will GB be updated again, with more fantastic feature, or will ICS and JB got them?

The problem is that there will be a hell lot of bugs, maybe even a brick... So when I try a new ROM, best I wait till it has only a few bugs that can be replaced with 3rd party apps (eg. Fm radio)
What do you think?
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy W (GT-I8150) with CM9 Alpha 6.

there will be a hell lot of bugs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, bug may exists but that been always a good news if someone try port rom for us!
at least we have a good starting point, cm9 which can be considered as fully working now :good:

Well, If he's really going to port CM10 for us, I hope he knows that may need to rewrite all the drivers again, like in ICS. And I remember he said in CM7 port topic that he doesn't know very much about kernel and drivers development, Oisis was helping him. I thought he should finish CM7 first, but If he consider better to start CM10, so let's go. I'll try to start studying better of kernel development for helping'em out. Like arco's said before, our community has an lack of kernel developers.

fredamsouza said:
Well, If he's really going to port CM10 for us, I hope he knows that may need to rewrite all the drivers again, like in ICS. And I remember he said in CM7 port topic that he doesn't know very much about kernel and drivers development, Oisis was helping him. I thought he should finish CM7 first, but If he consider better to start CM10, so let's go. I'll try to start studying better of kernel development for helping'em out. Like arco's said before, our community has an lack of kernel developers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah we need all the support we can get (says the guy who doesn't know a thing about kernels and stuff)...
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy W (GT-I8150) with CM9 Alpha 6.

iDelta said:
The problem is that there will be a hell lot of bugs, maybe even a brick... So when I try a new ROM, best I wait till it has only a few bugs that can be replaced with 3rd party apps (eg. Fm radio)
What do you think?
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy W (GT-I8150) with CM9 Alpha 6.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Arco encounters 2 hard bricks + several soft bricks when porting CM9

fredamsouza said:
Well, If he's really going to port CM10 for us, I hope he knows that may need to rewrite all the drivers again, like in ICS. And I remember he said in CM7 port topic that he doesn't know very much about kernel and drivers development, Oisis was helping him. I thought he should finish CM7 first, but If he consider better to start CM10, so let's go. I'll try to start studying better of kernel development for helping'em out. Like arco's said before, our community has an lack of kernel developers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's easier than upgrade from gb to ics. I don't know much about writing driver so i think i will make a bootable cm10 and the rest is for others developer

bangprovn said:
It's easier than upgrade from gb to ics. I don't know much about writing driver so i think i will make a bootable cm10 and the rest is for others developer
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hope you will success ～

Its the right decision, in my opinion - working on a Gingerbread-ROM does not make any sense at the moment - From features to smoothness, ICS is by far the better choice. Although RAM is a bottleneck for some purposes on the Galaxy W, the device as a whole has enough power to profit from the enhancements that came with ICS and JB.

@bangprovn, would you please release your CM7 source code/repo over github or other repos hosting share with maybe some note howto compile it, I have try it but no luck, stuck on brunch ancora command.
It says there is no ancora device code or sumtim like that
On ur cm7 threat osiris had some patch 4 wifi driver, but I'm sure there are some config on device.mk should be aligned correctly, and I think I could learn easily read ur porting process than I have to start from zero, with your mentoring maybe.
Sorry for my bad english

i am exciting～～ for cm10

I'm really looking forward to this!!

bangprovn said:
It's easier than upgrade from gb to ics. I don't know much about writing driver so i think i will make a bootable cm10 and the rest is for others developer
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This will be a powerhouse and fast development in CM10 for our phone. A period of 3-4 months, we have a stable CM ROM.

What ROM for my girlfriend? (stable, reliable, great battery life)

Hello everybody.
I've rooted and modded the Samsung Galaxy W of my girlfriend but now i'm facing a lot of strange battery issues: the battery drains really fast and she hates it.
I've tried CM9 RC6 and SlimBean but the problem is still here. I've got no time to waste on trying 20 ROMs so i'm asking you a suggestion.
She was really excited about the stock ROM. It was fair enough for her, apart from the bloatware that couldn't be uninstalled and some random reboots and freeze.
So, i'm searching for something like that:
Great battery life
Stable and reliable ROM
Possibly CM based or AOSP
In my opinion, a CyanogenMod 7 would be great, but i can't find it for the SGW.
Could you please help me?
Thank you!

sberla54 said:
Hello everybody.
I've rooted and modded the Samsung Galaxy W of my girlfriend but now i'm facing a lot of strange battery issues: the battery drains really fast and she hates it.
I've tried CM9 Beta 6 and SlimBean but the problem is still here. I've got no time to waste on trying 20 ROMs so i'm asking you a suggestion.
She was really excited about the stock ROM. It was fair enough for her, apart from the bloatware that couldn't be uninstalled and some random reboots and freeze.
So, i'm searching for something like that:
Great battery life
Stable and reliable ROM
Possibly CM based or AOSP
In my opinion, a CyanogenMod 7 would be great, but i can't find it for the SGW.
Could you please help me?
Thank you!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I answered you in slimbean post

Ahmed.ragab said:
I answered you in slimbean post
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Slim-3.1.0 Ancora 12/06/12 Unoffical with standard kernel (or with Fofivo as the other user said). Noted!
I'll wait for more suggestions before wiping and flashing again. I wanna be sure this time..

sberla54 said:
Slim-3.1.0 Ancora 12/06/12 Unoffical with standard kernel (or with Fofivo as the other user said). Noted!
I'll wait for more suggestions before wiping and flashing again. I wanna be sure this time..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stock one is awesome and better battery life
And if you want more ram use forfivo but battery life will be less than with stock one

What about those ones?
77ROM - http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2166571
AOSP - http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2102599
SlimICS - http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2132748
They seems pretty basic too.
I've checked Paranoid Android and Pac-Man too but i think they've got too much stuff that i don't need and she won't use.

sberla54 said:
What about those ones?
77ROM - http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2166571
AOSP - http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2102599
SlimICS - http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2132748
They seems pretty basic too.
I've checked Paranoid Android and Pac-Man too but i think they've got too much stuff that i don't need and she won't use.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
from those 3 links i prefer aosp..and without mods..for launcher just use nova/apex..
and for my suggestion try cm9rc7..
Sent from my GT-I8150 using Tapatalk 2

My honest advice:
Do not consider anything except Stock ROM with Value Pack or CM9.
Its not that those other coders are not talented. But - it's like with those small, heavily tuned / modified Honda Civics driving around: Their owner / creators and other enthusiasts love them for their custom mods, but you really could/would not give such a car to your girldfirend, mother, or whatever.
sooner or later you run into problems that will never be fixed, nothing for daily usage by a non-IT-person.
With beta 6, i guess you mean RC6?
Battery lasting, the missing fm radio and a sometimes not-100%-stable camera would be the only drawbacks i see for it.
Performance and overall fluidity is at least one class over the stock rom, really remarkable.
Maybe there will be better battery performancee with CM9 in the future, as it is not really clear atm, what causes the impacts.
But i think its unlikely that it will ever reach the Stock ROM under this aspect, as the new features are simply likely to consumer more cpu cycles then before.

stpdkid said:
from those 3 links i prefer aosp..and without mods..for launcher just use nova/apex..
and for my suggestion try cm9rc7..
Sent from my GT-I8150 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM9 RC6 was actually my first choice, because a friend of mine is using it without any problem. Anyway, i've experienced the huge battery drain even with CM9 RC6.
I can give a try to CM9 RC7 but i'm wondering: wouldn't it be better to choose a ROM with the 2.x kernel?
XR-7 said:
My honest advice:
Do not consider anything except Stock ROM with Value Pack or CM9.
Its not that those other coders are not talented. But - it's like with those small, heavily tuned / modified Honda Civics driving around: Their owner / creators and other enthusiasts love them for their custom mods, but you really could/would not give such a car to your girldfirend, mother, or whatever.
sooner or later you run into problems that will never be fixed, nothing for daily usage by a non-IT-person.
With beta 6, i guess you mean RC6?
Battery lasting, the missing fm radio and a sometimes not-100%-stable camera would be the only drawbacks i see for it.
Performance and overall fluidity is at least one class over the stock rom, really remarkable.
Maybe there will be better battery performancee with CM9 in the future, as it is not really clear atm, what causes the impacts.
But i think its unlikely that it will ever reach the Stock ROM under this aspect, as the new features are simply likely to consumer more cpu cycles then before.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, i meant RC6, sorry.
Sadly, battery performance is crucial for my girlfriend. Anyway, i just want a "normal" battery drain; what i'm experiencing is a very massive battery drain, totally abnormal.
Would you suggest me a Stock ROM with Value Pack? Maybe it's the better choice...

for me battery drains so fast because of to many apps..just install apps only for daily use..
yeahh i can see some of us back to 2.6..
rc7 impress me..see the ss..with stock battery(old one)..
Sent from my GT-I8150 using Tapatalk 2

stpdkid said:
for me battery drains so fast because of to many apps..just install apps only for daily use..
yeahh i can see some of us back to 2.6..
rc7 impress me..see the ss..with stock battery(old one)..
Sent from my GT-I8150 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think the same but she's just like 20 apps, Pinterest, Instagram, GoogleReader, Dolphin, GMail, and stuff like this.
Regarding your screenshot, 17% left after 10 hours is not so great.
This is her phone now:
Can i install a 2.x kernel on CM9 RC7?

like i told you before..i use my old battery and stock 3.0kernel rc7..my battery usually last no longer than 5-6hrs..
you got 16hrs..that better than mine..
if you want 2.6 kernel i think it is better to install cm9 rc2..
Sent from my GT-I8150 using Tapatalk 2

stpdkid said:
like i told you before..i use my old battery and stock 3.0kernel rc7..my battery usually last no longer than 5-6hrs..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
5 - 6 hours? How can you use the phone? You can't even go outside for a dinner that you have to charge your phone.
Do you mean that you actively use the phone for 6 hours or what?

sberla54 said:
5 - 6 hours? How can you use the phone? You can't even go outside for a dinner that you have to charge your phone.
Do you mean that you actively use the phone for 6 hours or what?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
before,,im so addicted to game and not too busy at work,,so i play..
until my phone temp get too high because of oc+gaming and i almost hardbricked my wonder, so i decided to stop..
i see now we have oneofakind rom thats great rom for gaming but not again beside that now i have so many work to do..:crying:
i remember once i got my bat last for 24 hours,
if im not mistaken its aosp by outerheaven..:fingers-crossed:

Understood, thanks
AOSP by outerheaven was one in the list of the ones i wanted to try...
Would you suggest me a Stock ROM with Value Pack? Maybe it's the better choice...

sberla54 said:
Understood, thanks
AOSP by outerheaven was one in the list of the ones i wanted to try...
Would you suggest me a Stock ROM with Value Pack? Maybe it's the better choice...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
woahh..its been long time i didnt use stock rom(gb).
i dunno bout stock rom, but i use xxlm8 before i change to zcll1..after i flash it using odin then i flash cm9..
for gb cusrom i prefer rio's black note and rebel rom..older than that i usually use cowithgun's and kezra's rom,,

stpdkid said:
woahh..its been long time i didnt use stock rom(gb).
i dunno bout stock rom, but i use xxlm8 before i change to zcll1..after i flash it using odin then i flash cm9..
for gb cusrom i prefer rio's black note and rebel rom..older than that i usually use cowithgun's and kezra's rom,,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You mean these ones?
Black Notes: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1483072
RebelROM: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1673875
Bagux Project Rom: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1687854
They're pretty old and discontinued but they could be enough for my girlfriend. I'll check them better later.
Thanks!

sberla54 said:
You mean these ones?
Black Notes: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1483072
RebelROM: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1673875
Bagux Project Rom: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1687854
They're pretty old and discontinued but they could be enough for my girlfriend. I'll check them better later.
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
beside the aosp & cm9..try queen anne's revenge or biohazard..
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app

These ones?
Queen Anne's Revenge: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2161091
BioHazard RoM: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1927428
They're just customized CyanogenMod, and i've already have problems with CyanogenMod. If i would try CM another time, i would stick to CM9 Unofficial
Even if Queen Anne's Revenge is aimed to best battery life and it's made by an italian (as me ). It's interesting...
I think i'm gonna flash one of those modified stocks! Wish me luck!

At the end of all my tests, i've decided to keep using F.A.W. (Rls 3, from the same branch of Rls 2): http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1626827
It's simply a powered Samsung stock but it's rocking stable, really fast, enough good looking and with a huge battery life!
Perfect for my girlfriend!

Which one is better? 4.1.2 or 4.2.2?

Someday later, i may have to change ROMS from ICS cos' its out of date already... So, i like gaming quite alot of times lately and if i'm on a looooooong trip, i save battery extensively... I don't like themeing as much as other people so yea... Which one is best for me? 4.1.2 or 4.2.2? Don't mention ICS by the way cos' i know its stable fast etc etc...

TiTAN-O-One said:
Someday later, i may have to change ROMS from ICS cos' its out of date already... So, i like gaming quite alot of times lately and if i'm on a looooooong trip, i save battery extensively... I don't like themeing as much as other people so yea... Which one is best for me? 4.1.2 or 4.2.2? Don't mention ICS by the way cos' i know its stable fast etc etc...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i would choose 4.1.2...its more stable than 4.2.2.. so far only 2 roms that have amazed me with performance and battery life. express999 and remICS JB...Thats just my opinion...the choice is yours..

TiTAN-O-One said:
Someday later, i may have to change ROMS from ICS cos' its out of date already... So, i like gaming quite alot of times lately and if i'm on a looooooong trip, i save battery extensively... I don't like themeing as much as other people so yea... Which one is best for me? 4.1.2 or 4.2.2? Don't mention ICS by the way cos' i know its stable fast etc etc...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For me, i prefer 4.2.2 because i like all the features. Also with kernel 3.4, it is really smooth with gaming performance. Also, about the battery, sir arco already fixed the short battery life in kernel 3.4. But it might be not better then 4.1.2. But for me, i like 4.2.2 more. And i prefer cyanogenmod, of course
Sent from my CM10.1 Kernel 3.4 Wonder by arco using xda premium

geniusboy93 said:
For me, i prefer 4.2.2 because i like all the features. Also with kernel 3.4, it is really smooth with gaming performance. Also, about the battery, sir arco already fixed the short battery life in kernel 3.4. But it might be not better then 4.1.2. But for me, i like 4.2.2 more. And i prefer cyanogenmod, of course
Sent from my CM10.1 Kernel 3.4 Wonder by arco using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yup,4.2.2 has so many features which sometimes make 4.1.2 looks old and boring.... these features are the reason why i constantly switch between cm10 and cm10.1