Related
I know that in order to switch prl files you need to be on a sense rom I just don't understand why. My question is, what is the benefit of sense over non-sense or vise versa? Is there a better performance or signal from one or the other? Seems like some people are hardcore for one or the other.
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk 2
Better? You're asking an opinion question. Sense works just fine in my opinion.
Sent from my PC36100 using xda premium
Yes its an opinion question as well as a stats question. I'm trying to decide what to go with. My job takes me places with poor signal. I can change prls with sense so that I force to Vzw towers, but does non-sense rom provide any better reception? That is my main concern above looks.
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk 2
I have found that Sense takes up more memory since it is an add on to the stock android. Some people feel that all of these extra apps and code that come with Sense slow it down. Sense also comes with apps from HTC that people just love (the Widget Clock is one). If you do not like the Sense overlay and use another launcher then the need/desire for Sense decreases
I prefer Sense-less and for a long time I was running tommytomatoe's Classic. While it is a Sense ROM it also comes Sense-less. The latest version allows you to remove Sense once you have installed the ROM. What I liked about this build, besides its stability and speed, is that it had prl update.
From what you have said, this may be the ROM for you.
Doc
gsx1000r02 said:
Yes its an opinion question as well as a stats question. I'm trying to decide what to go with. My job takes me places with poor signal. I can change prls with sense so that I force to Vzw towers, but does non-sense rom provide any better reception? That is my main concern above looks.
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I personally hate sense but as far as overall for reception and data/wifi speeds your probably gonna get the best results as the firmware was designed specifically for your device
The only thing I don't like about Sense is the crippled bluetooth. It looks like HTC has fixed this in the newest EVO as people are reporting the bluetooth now works with wii remotes and Sense. If only there was some way we could get it fixed for the OG.
If I was non-sense then there would be no way to force to Vzw prls. That to me is a good trick while I'm at work. Is there anything that can be done on non-sense to help signal strength?
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk 2
gsx1000r02 said:
If I was non-sense then there would be no way to force to Vzw prls. That to me is a good trick while I'm at work. Is there anything that can be done on non-sense to help signal strength?
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nothing that would come close to what you get with Verizon's prls.. go with SOS you have so many different options with aroma installer you can make it just how you want it.. it sounds like that'll be the best bet for you
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Call me a noob, but what do you mean SOS?
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk 2
gsx1000r02 said:
Call me a noob, but what do you mean SOS?
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Swagged out stock rom
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Had to clear that up.
I'm just interested in knowing what ROMs you guys are running, and why.
I'm not rooted yet (plan on doing that tomorrow)
but I'm looking for the most stable ROM with the best battery life.
With all of these threads and links, it's hard to keep up.
So I'm hoping to hear from the community.
I have no intentions of this thread turning into a "this ROM is better than X ROM because of Y Reason."
Just seeing what needs people have and the ROM(s) that fit those needs.
And I'm curious as to which one(s) have spectacular battery life!
Post away.
Sent from my Galaxy S3 using Tapatalk 2
I came from a S2 which is how I learned to root. Its fun. Flashing is addictive... really. I change roms when ever one has something new and cool I just gotta try but I can truly say that JELLYBAM is the best I have used as of now.... though im always looking. If you get over the broken boot up imiage its the best I have used (not that I tried them all) I get like 20percent drain from a entire day of use
I am running ParanoidKANGdroid right now, going on closer to a week on it. I have tried CM10.1 nightlies and the newest AOKP, as well as task650's AOKP, but my favorite so far is this one. It has the most customization I've found, which I really love. My only complaints are that I don't like the camera, the "desk clock", and it's only 4.2.1. So far my favorite though
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda app-developers app
You said its not but it is....
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda premium
drinfernoo said:
I am running ParanoidKANGdroid right now, going on closer to a week on it. I have tried CM10.1 nightlies and the newest AOKP, as well as task650's AOKP, but my favorite so far is this one. It has the most customization I've found, which I really love. My only complaints are that I don't like the camera, the "desk clock", and it's only 4.2.1. So far my favorite though
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im using Paranoidandroid, i felt like kangdroid was too bulky with too much extra stuff i didn't need/want. I like paranoid cause it seems pretty simple and smooth. But i have had some issues with random restarts, camera messing up, gallary messing up, and some other things i cant remember right now. I rooted for the first time like a week or so ago and i really like it. I just want more stability, best that i've used but im not satisfied. Plus the rom hasn't been touched since 11/21/12 so it could probably use some upgrades.
Anything is better than ATT stock JB, which sometimes drained in 20hrs.
Right now what im looking for though is a stock rom that has been stripped and streamlined. I have two things i need my phone for, Ustream/Livestream and taking pictures/video. Anything that is gonna crash unexpectedly or slow down because of so much extra junk is useless to me.
xxsicknessxx said:
I came from a S2 which is how I learned to root. Its fun. Flashing is addictive... really. I change roms when ever one has something new and cool I just gotta try but I can truly say that JELLYBAM is the best I have used as of now.... though im always looking. If you get over the broken boot up imiage its the best I have used (not that I tried them all) I get like 20percent drain from a entire day of use
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 I've researched almost all of the roms for our phone and i found that jellybam suits my needs. Plus i find that the mixture of ParanoidAndroid, AOKP, and Cyanogenmod is cool and makes for a lot of customization and features. It's a good rom pretty stable not much bugs or anything. And i'm also getting good battery life. I think the boot image should be fixed soon. But as with any rom it's all up to personal preference.
Battery life and stability are the two things I look for in a rom. 4.2.1 ROMs are the way to go unless you need Bluetooth streaming. Everything else has been near perfectly stable. Liquid smooth, tasks aokp, illusion and slimbean take your pick.
jefferson9 said:
Battery life and stability are the two things I look for in a rom. 4.2.1 ROMs are the way to go unless you need Bluetooth streaming. Everything else has been near perfectly stable. Liquid smooth, tasks aokp, illusion and slimbean take your pick.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But none of those have the Bluetooth streaming figured out?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda app-developers app
drinfernoo said:
But none of those have the Bluetooth streaming figured out?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
I am on Task650's 12/23/12 build because I use Bluetooth media streaming (mostly Audible) extensively throughout the day, in my car. The newest version of Task's ROM is nice and solid, but I can't live without BT audio.
I will commit to daily JB ROM flashing when that issue is cleared up.
drinfernoo said:
But none of those have the Bluetooth streaming figured out?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not completely sure. Not something that I use. I've read people are having problems with it. I'm sure the cyanogenmod team is working hard on it and will probably have it working in the next few weeks.
I'm torn.
I love the Touchwiz Features I get now.
(S Beam, S Voice, Smart Stay, etc)
But I want AOKP 4.2.
Ugh. What should I do?
Sent from my Galaxy S3 using Tapatalk 2
I enjoy touchwiz features too. They're not something I use everyday but I prefer being on 4.2. So many speed and battery life improvements.
Keep in mind you can usually find an app to replace touchwiz features. Like smart statusbar will allow you to show the status bar when in full screen mode.
Thanks for the input!
Do you know of any Touchwiz ROMs/kernels that drastically improve battery life?
Sent from my Galaxy S3 using Tapatalk 2
Encerspay said:
Thanks for the input!
Do you know of any Touchwiz ROMs/kernels that drastically improve battery life?
Sent from my Galaxy S3 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
VLDLK4 Boomin battery
Sent from my SGH-I747M using xda app-developers app
1894 llyetuar
Ive been using Task&Ktoonsez's Rom for quite a while now. hes always on top of getting things updated to the next version, and is really quick about getting bugs ironed out. if you look at the developer thread he can be a bit prickly, but his roms are great.
I know this is mainly an opinion-based question, but I just wanted to get an idea of how people felt about it. I have a post a few posts down asking about non-TW roms that have multi-window but it seems MiUi is the only one that's a hybrid of AOSP and TW and contains that feature. Not only can I not seem to find a download link, I really think I prefer the full AOSP experience.
So my question is, are people mainly staying with TW for all the features it brings or are people finding it worth it to switch to AOSP while sacrificing the other features?
Thanks in advance!
TW has more features.
Less bugs.
Much better battery.
I used to never use TW roms until I got the Note 2, but with this phone and well TW runs it is kinda stupid to run aosp.
My opinion.
I use aosp because I never used multi Window or the spen. I really bought the phone for the size.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 using xda app-developers app
zmarchank said:
I know this is mainly an opinion-based question, but I just wanted to get an idea of how people felt about it. I have a post a few posts down asking about non-TW roms that have multi-window but it seems MiUi is the only one that's a hybrid of AOSP and TW and contains that feature. Not only can I not seem to find a download link, I really think I prefer the full AOSP experience.
So my question is, are people mainly staying with TW for all the features it brings or are people finding it worth it to switch to AOSP while sacrificing the other features?
Thanks in advance!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Although you're not trying to ask an opinion based question.. you kind of are lol. If you don't care for the multi-window, S-Pen, and other features then try something new. I honestly don't like using custom ROMs because of some of the issues. I messed my phone up trying to load a ROM and couldn't use it for like 3 days.
Exercise at your own risk.
NightHawkUndead said:
TW has more features.
Less bugs.
Much better batter.
I used to never use TW roms until I got the Note 2, but with this phone and well TW runs it is kinda stupid to run aosp.
My opinion.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 :thumbup::thumbup:
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 using Xparent SkyBlue Tapatalk 2
+1 for tw..... the best hands down.. I dont use multiwindow or spen that much, but much rather use tw over aosp
From my side... I like tw and no real complaints... One day switched to cm out of curiosity and since I never used multi window and the only time in bring out the spen is to write with papyrus I just never made the effort to change back.
Battery life for me hasn't been any better or worse since the switch. I do charge nightly and while on tw and cm I still last a day on a single charge with heavy use.
This is where my opinion comes in... I like the color scheme of cm and the popup for text messages... Yes I can get it other ways but getting it all in one spot works best for me.
Sent from my Note 2 using Tapatalk 2
rans0m00 said:
From my side... I like tw and no real complaints... One day switched to cm out of curiosity and since I never used multi window and the only time in bring out the spen is to write with papyrus I just never made the effort to change back.
Battery life for me hasn't been any better or worse since the switch. I do charge nightly and while on tw and cm I still last a day on a single charge with heavy use.
This is where my opinion comes in... I like the color scheme of cm and the popup for text messages... Yes I can get it other ways but getting it all in one spot works best for me.
Sent from my Note 2 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Like you said your first time trying CM so that's why you liked it so much. Lots of us here have most likely had that CM on a previous device.. So that's why we rather have TW!! Don't like issues need my phone too much... lol, plus I'm on it too much
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 using Xparent SkyBlue Tapatalk 2
Bajanman said:
Like you said your first time trying CM so that's why you liked it so much. Lots of us here have most likely had that CM on a previous device.. So that's why we rather have TW!! Don't like issues need my phone too much... lol, plus I'm on it too much
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 using Xparent SkyBlue Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I still feel they are on an equal footing.
Yes if you update nightly you can end up with a phone you have to mess with to get working but find a stable enough release and don't use the tw specific feature then why stick with tw?
That turns back around to the personal preference of I just like the simple things like the drop down menu over the tw version... Which I can't even use in a real debate since it's just an opinion of mine and I can't prove it to be any better than the tw version.
Sent from my Note 2 using Tapatalk 2
rans0m00 said:
That turns back around to the personal preference of I just like the simple things like the drop down menu over the tw version... Which I can't even use in a real debate since it's just an opinion of mine and I can't prove it to be any better than the tw version.
Sent from my Note 2 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sure you can. The drop down on CM ROMS can have all the tiles you want on the first screen. No scrolling to the side like in TW ROMS...at least the ones I have used.
I like CM ROMS because of the customizing features....more themes that can be used via Play Store etc etc. Also, group messaging built in that works flawless. The ROM I am using has had no issues for me. Camera Bluetooth everything works just perfectly.
jbeef86 said:
sure you can. The drop down on CM ROMS can have all the tiles you want on the first screen. No scrolling to the side like in TW ROMS...at least the ones I have used.
I like CM ROMS because of the customizing features....more themes that can be used via Play Store etc etc. Also, group messaging built in that works flawless. The ROM I am using has had no issues for me. Camera Bluetooth everything works just perfectly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cm is good smooth, quick, customization plus better battery life imho. But full function of Note ll I would pick TW base rom.
Sent from my SGH-I317M
jon3sh said:
Cm is good smooth, quick, customization plus better battery life imho. But full function of Note ll I would pick TW base rom.
Sent from my SGH-I317M
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yup I agree with all that.
This is simple, if you use multi window then stay with tw. If you don't use it the flash a custom rom.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 using Tapatalk 2
LittleRedDot said:
This is simple, if you use multi window then stay with tw. If you don't use it the flash a custom rom.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's how I feel about it.
Sent from my Note 2 using Tapatalk 2
I agree with @LittleRedDot. TW is fine if you use all or most of the stuff they put in.
I never really used multi window, or the motion actions, so when I wanted to go custom I didn't readily miss any of the stock software features.
the only thing I used allot of was palmswipe to screen shot.
Sent from my t0lteCAN [SGH-i317M] using Tapatalk 4 Beta
TW here. Never really had a problem with it, but Multiwindow and S-Pen are what I use this phone for.
I've read various threads where people discuss that the use of an AOSP-based ROM resulted in poorer radio performance, and some saying that this persisted even *after* flashing back to stock or other sense-based ROM. The latter is what is keeping me from trying out any of the AOSP-based ROMs available. I don't want to irreversibly worsen reception, because I really, REALLY hated dealing with that issue on my Galaxy Nexus.
Any thoughts?
godhamba said:
I've read various threads where people discuss that the use of an AOSP-based ROM resulted in poorer radio performance, and some saying that this persisted even *after* flashing back to stock or other sense-based ROM. The latter is what is keeping me from trying out any of the AOSP-based ROMs available. I don't want to irreversibly worsen reception, because I really, REALLY hated dealing with that issue on my Galaxy Nexus.
Any thoughts?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I ran PACman for a while before switching to Bonestock...I never noticed any difference in reception. I ran a few speed tests before, during and after PACman and they were are fairly similar.
Sent from my HTC6500LVW using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Isn't the radio flashed separately from the ROM? I flashed tons of roms with my s3 and never really noticed a difference in reception.
Go under about phones and look at the signal strength in there and bet sense or aosp it will be the same. Never go by the bars as you can make them read whatever you want them to.
Sent from my HTC6500LVW using Tapatalk
There have been several folks who, after flashing an AOSP ROM, can't get cell service (only data) when reverting back to stock. It's not just s question of bar deception.
Dark Jedi said:
Go under about phones and look at the signal strength in there and bet sense or aosp it will be the same. Never go by the bars as you can make them read whatever you want them to.
Sent from my HTC6500LVW using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've experienced reception issues and lag w/ AOSP roms. The phone is just designed for Sense imho...
godhamba said:
I've read various threads where people discuss that the use of an AOSP-based ROM resulted in poorer radio performance, and some saying that this persisted even *after* flashing back to stock or other sense-based ROM. The latter is what is keeping me from trying out any of the AOSP-based ROMs available. I don't want to irreversibly worsen reception, because I really, REALLY hated dealing with that issue on my Galaxy Nexus.
Any thoughts?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've noticed signal strength dings on some aosp roms but not all oddly enough. I do seem to get the best signal on sense based roms though (GPE roms and the like).
Sent from my HTC6500LVW using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
You need to remember that AOSP roms are hacked together for phones that were never meant to run it. I'm not trying to discourage anyone from flashing those roms since that's up to reach person, but no AOSP rom will ever run as good as a Sense rom. It's just the nature of things.
CNexus said:
You need to remember that AOSP roms are hacked together for phones that were never meant to run it. I'm not trying to discourage anyone from flashing those roms since that's up to reach person, but no AOSP rom will ever run as good as a Sense rom. It's just the nature of things.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've yet to see any sense rom run better than a nightly, let alone a stable build (from a pure performance standpoint)
As far as the OP- Signals will be within 0-5db depending on the rom, and that's only because we're on a CDMA device with a closed source RIL.
CNexus said:
You need to remember that AOSP roms are hacked together for phones that were never meant to run it. I'm not trying to discourage anyone from flashing those roms since that's up to reach person, but no AOSP rom will ever run as good as a Sense rom. It's just the nature of things.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I love aosp roms, but I tend to agree with you.
With my s3, I noticed a difference with my signal in certain places using aosp vs stock rom. But with the One, I haven't noticed a signal difference.
Sent from my HTC6500LVW using Tapatalk
I don't just mean signal. I mean in general. You will never find an AOSP rom for a non-nexus device that has everything working on par with the stock rom.
There are always things that are slightly buggy, or require some sort of hacky workaround or whatnot.
CNexus said:
I don't just mean signal. I mean in general. You will never find an AOSP rom for a non-nexus device that has everything working on par with the stock rom.
There are always things that are slightly buggy, or require some sort of hacky workaround or whatnot.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry you are wrong neo has aosp roms on the rezound that runs better than sense and data is spot on.
Sent from my HTC6500LVW using Tapatalk
Some will say yes, but they are using the subjective "bars" and not the actual dBm to check ratings. I haven't noticed any change in signal when I used it in the past on CM and whatnot.
I've had terrible signal strength lately (using dBm numbers) and wondered if something was wrong with my phone until I read this. Are there any other threads discussing the issue and possible solutions? If I can't fix this I'm going to have to get back to a locked bootloader and S-on and swap the phone out. -110 signal as a norm just isn't cutting it.
I don't see the bog deal with the higher numbers. Here are my numbers on sense. They are no difference thsn what you are getting on aosp. One is in a better coverage are where the other is on the front. I notice no difference in performance of the data.
The higher number one had it jump to 116 but does not interfere with tethering. You can try to swap out your phone but doubt they will do it and most likely you live right on the edge of the 4g coverage. My pictures shows sense and those are the same numbers I got while on aosp.
Sent from my HTC6500LVW using Tapatalk
cstrife999 said:
Some will say yes, but they are using the subjective "bars" and not the actual dBm to check ratings. I haven't noticed any change in signal when I used it in the past on CM and whatnot.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
With my Nexus, I sat in a parking lot and went from one Rom to another, I noticed a difference in the numbers and surfing the web.
A kernel developer back then did say flashing various roms could impact signal strength.
I'll bet this topic has been discussed more times than we can count, but it's always nice to get a new perspective. Wouldn't you agree?
Sent from my HTC6500LVW using Tapatalk
dspcap said:
With my Nexus, I sat in a parking lot and went from one Rom to another, I noticed a difference in the numbers and surfing the web.
A kernel developer back then did say flashing various roms could impact signal strength.
I'll bet this topic has been discussed more times than we can count, but it's always nice to get a new perspective. Wouldn't you agree?
Sent from my HTC6500LVW using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
DBm will change in one location regardless probably by 20 or so. My fnex usually is around 75-100. Not that great I know
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
cstrife999 said:
DBm will change in one location regardless probably by 20 or so. My fnex usually is around 75-100. Not that great I know
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed, but I also surfed the web for a while, it was noticeable difference.
Sent from my HTC6500LVW using Tapatalk
dspcap said:
Agreed, but I also surfed the web for a while, it was noticeable difference.
Sent from my HTC6500LVW using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea I know I'm agreeing with you lol.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
cstrife999 said:
DBm will change in one location regardless probably by 20 or so. My fnex usually is around 75-100. Not that great I know
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You consider 70 not so good?
Sent from my HTC6500LVW using Tapatalk
Which do you prefer?
Both. Hybrid that is.
Sent from my SGH-M919 using Tapatalk 2
For whatever reason, I get significantly better battery life using tw roms vs aosp. I prefer the look of aosp though. Battery life is winning the battle right now and I'm on TW
I have always preferred an aosp rom but they do not always offer all the goodies.. like mhl, or t-mobile wifi calling for example.. definitely always had better battery life for me, more free ram etc..
sent from my AnthraX'd m919
I dunno. That's a tough one. They both have their pros and cons. I can't honestly say that I think one is better than the other. If I had a low end device that might be a different story. I've been sticking with TW lately.
Ever since the s3 I've been sticking to tw since they offer some goodies that i find convenient.. And also the battery life has been way better for me
Sent from my SGH-M919 using xda app-developers app
TouchWiz + rovo89s Xposed framework + one of the many tweaked kernels = better than any AOSP rom I've used. Just my own preference though ^_^
Sent from my SGH-M919 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
After trying pretty much every ROM compatible with my TMO S4, I keep coming back to the TMO TW ROMs. Most importantly, you can't get wi-fi calling any other way. But, as Slim TW ROMs have become more common and my comfort level with making changes has risen, I have given up the idea of dual booting with an ASOP/GE/MIUI/etc. ROM as my daily driver & TW for wi-fi calling, and am now back to focusing on getting as stripped-down a TW as possible. I care nothing for eye candy and just want the quickest & most stable setup, and TW has fit the bill best for me.
TW (by a slight margin)
I prefer TW because of the camera
AOSP is still very snappy but TW is catching up to that standard (for me)
I use stock TW unrooted 4.3 btw
For me it depends on what is available at the time. Right now I've got the latest 4.3.1 cyanogenmod nightly:
Sent from my SGH-M919 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
AOSP all the way, I hate touchwiz it's so ugly.
TouchWiz seems to have much better battery life. I do prefer stock because I hate a lot of extra cruft but if that can be removed, it's not so bad.
Plus Wi-Fi calling is awesome for battery life.
I know a certain someone has gotten wifi calling to work on aosp.. Still waiting to get a hold of our myself tho..
Sent from my AnthraX'd M919
WFG said:
I know a certain someone has gotten wifi calling to work on aosp.. Still waiting to get a hold of our myself tho..
Sent from my AnthraX'd M919
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On the S4 AOSP?
I know it works on AOSP for the HTC One, but if you know someone who has it working on the S4 AOSP roms, you should advise that person that there is a considerable bounty built up of people willing to click the donate button a few times for a working installable Wifi Calling APK.
interesting to read the comments. I've been going back and forth between TW and AOSP ROMS. Is having the newest Android release the only major advantage of AOSP over TW? I don't think the look of AOSP is a valid reason since you can install launchers (i.e. Nova Launcher) to get the AOSP look on a TW ROM.
HKSpeed said:
interesting to read the comments. I've been going back and forth between TW and AOSP ROMS. Is having the newest Android release the only major advantage of AOSP over TW? I don't think the look of AOSP is a valid reason since you can install launchers (i.e. Nova Launcher) to get the AOSP look on a TW ROM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
exactly.. I love aosp but im using tw with nova. I gotta have battery life
what changes does samsung make kernel side? Are the improvements made to the asop kernel? It does seem like TW has better battery life...
also if someone has wifi calling ported... why is this staying in the shadows??
I like cm 10.2 stable, my daily driver, but when wicked v9 comes out, I'm going to be jumping on that real quick.
Sent from my SGH-M919 using xda premium
S4 - Google Play Edition, 4.4 with ______'s TMO WiFi calling patch & Kernel
erid2thed said:
S4 - Google Play Edition, 4.4 with ______'s TMO WiFi calling patch & Kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Am I reading this correctly? A 4.4 GE with wifi calling exists?
Sent from my SGH-M919 using xda app-developers app