Will jellybean make the Galaxy S3 faster than it already is? Not these ROMs that the devs make, i mean the actual samgsung jellybean update beamed to the S3 via Samsung Update.
If it will make it faster, by how much? Large visual difference?
Watch the video at this link. Should give you an idea.
http://www.gforgames.com/gadgets/samsung-galaxy-s3-release-date-price-specs-overview-20299/
Yes it will
project butter makes all jb phones really smooth
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Emperor using psycommu
The experience will be much more fluid and responsive based on my Nexus 7, however you might be interested to know that in side by side benchmarking, my SGSIII on ICS consistently beats my Nexus 7 on JB so you can imagine how good the GSIII will be once it's Jelly-fied...
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Xparent SkyBlue Tapatalk 2
Will the official JB release come with resizable pop-up video as seen on the Note 2?
dimebagdan65 said:
The experience will be much more fluid and responsive based on my Nexus 7, however you might be interested to know that in side by side benchmarking, my SGSIII on ICS consistently beats my Nexus 7 on JB so you can imagine how good the GSIII will be once it's Jelly-fied...
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Xparent SkyBlue Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i don't think that's gonna be accurate. benchmarks are never perfect especially sense they operate in the vm alot of times which makes them conditional to the performance and idiosyncrasy of the vm I'm on cm10 it is insanely faster but. Half the benchmarks screw up like linpack or quadrant or cfbench. But its perfectly fluid does alittle better in games gets amazing battery obviously cm10isn't a carrier release
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2
freecharlesmanson said:
i don't think that's gonna be accurate. benchmarks are never perfect especially sense they operate in the vm alot of times which makes them conditional to the performance and idiosyncrasy of the vm I'm on cm10 it is insanely faster but. Half the benchmarks screw up like linpack or quadrant or cfbench. But its perfectly fluid does alittle better in games gets amazing battery obviously cm10isn't a carrier release
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tested on AnTuTu and Screencast's built in bench which have always given me fairly accurate and consistent testing results especially on multi core devices. Both tested on stock rooted ROMs with stock kernels as a base line. Also just in standard use, the GSIII handles high intensity apps like Shadowgun, Dead Trigger, etc much better than the Nexus 7 and those, I'm sure you would agree, don't run inside any sort of virtual machine.
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Xparent SkyBlue Tapatalk 2
Galaxynote1234 said:
Watch the video at this link. Should give you an idea.
http://www.gforgames.com/gadgets/samsung-galaxy-s3-release-date-price-specs-overview-20299/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats ICS 4.0.4 not JB 4.1.1
dimebagdan65 said:
Tested on AnTuTu and Screencast's built in bench which have always given me fairly accurate and consistent testing results especially on multi core devices. Both tested on stock rooted ROMs with stock kernels as a base line. Also just in standard use, the GSIII handles high intensity apps like Shadowgun, Dead Trigger, etc much better than the Nexus 7 and those, I'm sure you would agree, don't run inside any sort of virtual machine.
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Xparent SkyBlue Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't get me wrong its gonna be quicker, technically just about everything with in Android is java as far as apps go. That aside I don't have a nexus 7 either. ...but but but what I'd infer jelly bean benchmarks will not be comparable to ics in reality ...we have it whooped for graphics though
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2
Related
Been using one of calkulin leaks all weekend I'm really loving how the task manager is set up. What do y'all like about ics so far?
Sent from the official iPhone killer
blackdragon79 said:
Been using one of calkulin leaks all weekend I'm really loving how the task manager is set up. What do y'all like about ics so far?
Sent from the official iPhone killer
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So far --------- Gingerbread.
everything. its like vista was to XP. Same features just more eye candy. Love ICS
Sent from the official iPhone killer
Success100 said:
everything. its like 7 was to XP. Same features just more eye candy. Love ICS
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
fixed, it just seems to run everything faster
Success100 said:
everything. its like vista was to XP. Same features just more eye candy. Love ICS
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WHOAH bad comparison there this would mean the bugs are here to stay j/k.
RainMotorsports said:
WHOAH bad comparison there this would mean the bugs are here to stay j/k.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A better comparison would be:
XP - gingerbread
Vista - Honeycomb
Win7 - Ice Cream Sandwich
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA
brooksyx said:
A better comparison would be:
XP - gingerbread
Vista - Honeycomb
Win7 - Ice Cream Sandwich
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Win 7/ICS ftw! yay
Honeycomb = Windows ME.
clamknuckle said:
Honeycomb = Windows ME.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I dont get it?
Windows ME wasnt supposed to be a visual refresher like vista was. Honeycomb was trying to make android look pretty. Same with vista.
so far so good
I been toying around with Fc18 an Calkulin FC24 and its been a very sleek experience. There are still some minor issues and hangs ups but overall ICS its a great improvement. My only issue has been continuous crashing on Dolphin HD browser, but it may be on their end.
I don't see ICS being much different than GB in performance. If anything, GB has better battery life with smoother experience compared to current ICS leaks.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA
brooksyx said:
A better comparison would be:
XP - gingerbread
Vista - Honeycomb
Win7 - Ice Cream Sandwich
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
c64 - gingerbread
dos 2.1 - honeycomb
win 7 - ics
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2 Beta-5
bhavi_jp said:
I don't see ICS being much different than GB in performance. If anything, GB has better battery life with smoother experience compared to current ICS leaks.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ICS is young it will get better has more bugs are ironed out. Also u have to remember that ics also has options for hardware gpu acceleration and runs on higher speced, more power hungry devices.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA
linuxpir8 said:
c64 - gingerbread
dos 2.1 - honeycomb
win 7 - ics
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2 Beta-5
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol. I like this comparison.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2 Beta-5
What's the fuss?
You know, this might be a good time to ask. Bypassing all the hyperbole, what makes ICS such an improvement over its predecessor?
My phone is using Calk's EL29 ROM and is running great with fast speed and solid battery life. As for cosmetic and functional bells and whistles I'm using ADW Launcher EX, WidgetLocker and a variety of pretty nifty apps and widgets.
If I had the time I'd backup my phone and try out one of these beta ICS ROM's but that's not really an option at the moment.
Henri Blanche said:
You know, this might be a good time to ask. Bypassing all the hyperbole, what makes ICS such an improvement over its predecessor?
My phone is using Calk's EL29 ROM and is running great with fast speed and solid battery life. As for cosmetic and functional bells and whistles I'm using ADW Launcher EX, WidgetLocker and a variety of pretty nifty apps and widgets.
If I had the time I'd backup my phone and try out one of these beta ICS ROM's but that's not really an option at the moment.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well I would assume on a device such as ours, you won't really see a big jump in performance. It is the newest and in its aosp form, where I personally believe it truly shines, it will hopefully bring forth a much more stable and overall better user experience. With every new iteration of googles os, they tweak and lighten it up so that devices with strong hardware will experience something incredible and on some of the older devices that will get official support will run even better.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2 Beta-5
On ICS i like the battery life and quick gps fix...
Hi all I'm still very new to this whole rooting stuff.
I'm using aokp build 38 this is the 1st Rom I've used
And lately I'm having a much better battery life than stock. But I just want to ask if there's a much better Rom out there that has great performance and battery.
Also could you name the Roms and what are so good about them?
Thanks in advance.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Everyone has a different opinion on this. There is no one rom that gives each phone good battery. Your best bet is to just try them out yourself.
Oh okay. Thanks what would you recommend?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
I personally like liquid smooth ROM and Airkernel
I'd recommend the redemption Rom.
The Dev claims that he is only fixing errors created by Google.
Ans he's right. 2 hours screen time v 4 hours is the way to go.
It's also notably faster and doesn't randomly reboot to often.
He does a video changelog for his rom. Which I believe is a characteristic of a dev who is proud of his work.
But whatever you use. Use it for at least a week.
Would be good to also mention what phone model. Gsm,Verizon,sprint.
With these kind of threads, you might as well just ask what everyone's favorite ROM is or what ROM they're currently using. You'll only rarely get a different answer, and there are already threads for all three subjects to begin with.
Guy above me has a point.
But, AOKP B39 and Franco M4 works wonders for me.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
kidrobot52 said:
Would be good to also mention what phone model. Gsm,Verizon,sprint.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
GSM . Sorry bout that
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
DLD511 said:
I'd recommend the redemption Rom.
The Dev claims that he is only fixing errors created by Google.
Ans he's right. 2 hours screen time v 4 hours is the way to go.
It's also notably faster and doesn't randomly reboot to often.
He does a video changelog for his rom. Which I believe is a characteristic of a dev who is proud of his work.
But whatever you use. Use it for at least a week.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Isn't the redemption rom for sprint only?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Try slim ics.
Sent from rooted Jitterbug running ICS
Doodsz said:
GSM . Sorry bout that
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Verizon only.-_____-
DLD511 said:
Verizon only.-_____-
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh Damn. I'll try CM9 next week. But not really sure what the difference is to aokp. :/
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Doodsz said:
Oh Damn. I'll try CM9 next week. But not really sure what the difference is to aokp. :/
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AOKP has more features sacrificing some high performance.
DLD511 said:
AOKP has more features sacrificing some high performance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Other than possibly in benchmarks, where's the performance difference between AOKP and CM9? I've tried both and currently run AOKP and I didn't notice any difference it performance between the two.
MCR from Paul Obrien over at Modaco. Together with the Franco kernel. Great performance and battery-life
I'm using black ice. I like the black theme
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
I know each kernel works different but they also are optimized for different things. Which kernels are best optimjzed for intense gaming. Such as playing deadtrigger with the tegra3 graphics settings on.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Dri94 said:
I know each kernel works different but they also are optimized for different things. Which kernels are best optimjzed for intense gaming. Such as playing deadtrigger with the tegra3 graphics settings on.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Now this is just me.. the nexus runs fine either way with you try to play, what makes me say this is the no lag in N64roid when playing Zelda.
But for the best way to avoid lag? Most kernels are the same and I don't know much about the kernels.. well the advanced stuff.
But from my understanding Performance plus Overclocking usually 1800* will pretty much avoid the lag, I've played Dead Trigger with full detail and haven't lagged at 1036*.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
It lags with glados with me. But nit with regular "high" settings. Also glados lags with most games for me. All the kernels are diff tho. Most are optimized for battery as ppl complain about that the most. So its hard finding the opposite. Im trying ti find one to play the Tegra3 "ultra high" settings without such high lag
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Dri94 said:
It lags with glados with me. But nit with regular "high" settings. Also glados lags with most games for me. All the kernels are diff tho. Most are optimized for battery as ppl complain about that the most. So its hard finding the opposite. Im trying ti find one to play the Tegra3 "ultra high" settings without such high lag
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try Franco or Trinity.
I've played on GLaDOS before and games ran fine.. could be ROM related too.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Yea for me it was usually ROM related
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
So my friend and I were comparing our phones he has an iPhone, and my phone would do everything faster his phone just did everything smoother, mostly we checked how games ran, his phone in game options ex: scrolling through options and upgrades was way more smooth and responsive while mine had hiccups, gameplay was the same though, but I'm curious why the iPhone is smoother scrolling even outside of its ui into games while my Hercules beats it in specs?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using xda app-developers app
Its not only hardware that determines how smooth it scrolls but also the software
In my opinion the reason I think it scrolls better has to do with apples memory management because it manages ram more smoothly so that's probably why
Also did you install custom kernel on your device?
Because if you did there would be no way you would lose
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using xda app-developers app
mycars12 said:
Its not only hardware that determines how smooth it scrolls but also the software
In my opinion the reason I think it scrolls better has to do with apples memory management because it manages ram more smoothly so that's probably why
Also did you install custom kernel on your device?
Because if you did there would be no way you would lose
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did I have nibbles kernel on my phone and the ROM is sbean
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using xda app-developers app
Wolfygang said:
I did I have nibbles kernel on my phone and the ROM is sbean
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol then i actually have no idea
the only thing that i could recommend is for you to try lightning zap rom
also overclock to the fullest and put in performance mode!!!!!
Then also install the v6 supercharger but i think slimbean already has it so
i think im stumped on this one lol!
Lightening zap is a kernel. And as for performance once we officially get project butter everything should be fine then.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
skaroger867 said:
Lightening zap is a kernel. And as for performance once we officially get project butter everything should be fine then.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol yeah i totally did a typo there but i meant kernel!
but thanks for clarifying that i wouldn't want to spread that around
well i guess you explained it better than me and thanks!!!
"The iPhone changed things by introducing a dedicated thread with high priority for handling UI rendering, redirecting all power (CPU and GPU) to handling UI element rendering in realtime based on touch input. The result? Smooth-as-butter UI elements, transitions and animations as soon as you touch the screen -- even on older hardware when paired with the latest iOS 5 software. The drawback: everything else, from app downloads to content rendering will pause so the UI can keep that high frame rate, high quality redraw pace."
http://m.imore.com/android-ui-smooth-ios
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using xda premium
I've tried every kernel for this phone and most ROMs and there are brief times when the smoothness matches the iPhone, but the consistency just isn't there..
Speed..well that's a different story there are some ROM/kernel/tweak combos that make this phone pretty darn fast
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
rymanh said:
I've tried every kernel for this phone and most ROMs and there are brief times when the smoothness matches the iPhone, but the consistency just isn't there..
Speed..well that's a different story there are some ROM/kernel/tweak combos that make this phone pretty darn fast
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The t989 is faster than the iPhone 4s. Geekbench 2 proves that. But in terms of smoothness the iPhone will ALWAYS win. It's just the way Android is designed. iOS sets resources aside for UI transitions and whatnot and that's why you NEVER see an iPhone stutter and spurt like Android does at times. Give Android another year or so and this issue will be a thing of the past. Unfortunately the only way to resolve this with Android is better hardware... but it's coming!
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using xda premium
I'm pretty used to the spurts and sputters and its not a huge deal to me..I was running jedijelly for a while and went back to JMT for now until we get official ..its actually quite a bit faster than jedijelly and the battery life is outstanding ..its my opinion that JMT brings this phone almost on par with the iPhone smoothness..thanks to our great devs we have a big advantage over the average T989 user
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
I'm just gonna wish upon a star for Ubuntu new os to get to this device lol
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using xda app-developers app
Wolfygang said:
I'm just gonna wish upon a star for Ubuntu new os to get to this device lol
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not too familiar with Ubuntu but i agree that it would be cool
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
rymanh said:
I'm pretty used to the spurts and sputters and its not a huge deal to me..I was running jedijelly for a while and went back to JMT for now until we get official ..its actually quite a bit faster than jedijelly and the battery life is outstanding ..its my opinion that JMT brings this phone almost on par with the iPhone smoothness..thanks to our great devs we have a big advantage over the average T989 user
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow. I have the opposite experience. Touchwiz 4.0.4 spurts and stutters for me a lot. Add in the fact that it's nowhere near as snappy as AOSP 4.1 and I find myself constantly going back to jelly bean even though Touchwiz 4.0.4 gives me better battery life.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using xda premium
RushAOZ said:
Wow. I have the opposite experience. Touchwiz 4.0.4 spurts and stutters for me a lot. Add in the fact that it's nowhere near as snappy as AOSP 4.1 and I find myself constantly going back to jelly bean even though Touchwiz 4.0.4 gives me better battery life.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm still using jmtx1 even though there were is more current versions.
Even though ptmr3 said that adding the supercharge script was unnecessary I did it anyways just to ease my mind Lol I also added some of the battery saving mods from pmr...I keep my cpu set to ondemand/noop and slightly underclocked..and I am using the stock tw launcher ..
I think that some of the aosp ROMs out there may be slightly faster. but in my experiences they aren't as smooth as this one ..
Experiences may vary from phone to phone so there is no point in saying which ROM is better than the rest but I put my setup so someone can try it for themselves
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
well basically JB is the most stable ROM in my opinion that has the most support otherwise like ICS and GB don't have as much but i think that as soon as Ubuntu gets released the JB roms will be flowing like water but basically that also means that more roms will be smoother and remember that JB hasn't been officially released for our device so what there is currently is made by our awesome devs!
Has someone made a GB ROM for the gnex? I bet it would be wicked fast and smooth compared to other ROMs with higher Android versions. Is there anything that holds it back from getting GB?
Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk 2
PenguinxEnjoi said:
Has someone made a GB ROM for the gnex? I bet it would be wicked fast and smooth compared to other ROMs with higher Android versions. Is there anything that holds it back from getting GB?
Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, Even with its bugs, Kit Kat is much more optimized.
There are probably no drivers for it anyway.
You are not the first one to ask this question. Short answer: no.
Long answer: as of now there exists no known build of GB for gnex from anyone, since there is no blob and driver available from Samsung and TI to build GB on gnex. It will run fast, but not that much comparing to newer Android builds because of the lack of optimization at that time.
Don't forget the fact that 4.1.2 was probably the fastest for the GNexus, then again there's a ton load of optimizations that are needed to be done, then a massive downgrade to the camera drivers and chipset. Besides it would be a waste of time as there are a lot of restrictions and limitations. App support goes down the drain as well, you can kiss goodbye to all those fancy animations or superbly optimized launchers like Nova.
Also the only reason it will be fast is because of the scaling option is really low res compared to Jellybean/ICS.
I'm not sure if you really thought this through but it makes absolutely no sense to do so. It's like buying an i7 with 16GB RAM and high end graphics card... And then you install Windows 95.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk
Misledz said:
Don't forget the fact that 4.1.2 was probably the fastest for the GNexus, then again there's a ton load of optimizations that are needed to be done, then a massive downgrade to the camera drivers and chipset. Besides it would be a waste of time as there are a lot of restrictions and limitations. App support goes down the drain as well, you can kiss goodbye to all those fancy animations or superbly optimized launchers like Nova.
Also the only reason it will be fast is because of the scaling option is really low res compared to Jellybean/ICS.
I'm not sure if you really thought this through but it makes absolutely no sense to do so. It's like buying an i7 with 16GB RAM and high end graphics card... And then you install Windows 95.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You mean Windows XP? Because GB is the windows copy of Android and I'll deal with xp, I like it more than windows 7 &/or 8. But I see what your saying.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk 2
Your understanding about the OS is miss leading..
GB is probably 'heavier' on any Android phone due to worst memory management compared to ICS and JB (also depends on the hardware).
For example, my dad's Galaxy Ace 2 running smoother on JB 4.1.2 than on GB. Why? Because JB eat less RAM to run. KitKat supposed to eat lesser. Meanwhile my brother's Optimus One runs at best on ICS (first came out on Eclair, updated to GB officially), but really slow when it run on JB (the hardware won keep up).
BTW, I agree, JB 4.1.2 was the fastest on GNex.
haidoz said:
Your understanding about the OS is miss leading..
GB is probably 'heavier' on any Android phone due to worst memory management compared to ICS and JB (also depends on the hardware).
For example, my dad's Galaxy Ace 2 running smoother on JB 4.1.2 than on GB. Why? Because JB eat less RAM to run. KitKat supposed to eat lesser. Meanwhile my brother's Optimus One runs at best on ICS (first came out on Eclair, updated to GB officially), but really slow when it run on JB (the hardware won keep up).
BTW, I agree, JB 4.1.2 was the fastest on GNex.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If only they hadn't picked Omap as its chipset, probably it would live to see another day. A year in and the company closes down. I don't know if they tried to save the company thinking adding it on a Google phone would redeem the company, instead the GNexus was one of those poorly advertised phones, where only people who kept up with the Google trend or xda/root wiki knew about the phone and what it was really intended for.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4
PenguinxEnjoi said:
Has someone made a GB ROM for the gnex? I bet it would be wicked fast and smooth compared to other ROMs with higher Android versions. Is there anything that holds it back from getting GB?
Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
GB 2.3.7 Lezo Rom for Maguro..Try it here http://www.shendu.com/android/rom-3811.html
haidoz said:
Your understanding about the OS is miss leading..
GB is probably 'heavier' on any Android phone due to worst memory management compared to ICS and JB (also depends on the hardware).
For example, my dad's Galaxy Ace 2 running smoother on JB 4.1.2 than on GB. Why? Because JB eat less RAM to run. KitKat supposed to eat lesser. Meanwhile my brother's Optimus One runs at best on ICS (first came out on Eclair, updated to GB officially), but really slow when it run on JB (the hardware won keep up).
BTW, I agree, JB 4.1.2 was the fastest on GNex.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes ...p500 optimus one is slow on JB ..but its smooth ...and with the help of greenify and seeder ...
It works as good as stock ...
ICS is fast but not smooth
JB is smooth but not fast
Now i am waiting for kitkat
To run it on 3 years old phone ..
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda premium
Fast-Droid said:
GB 2.3.7 Lezo Rom for Maguro..Try it here http://www.shendu.com/android/rom-3811.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is this really for Maguro? The screenshots look more like 800x480...
Sent from Samsung Captivate Glide @ CM10.2
Woah OP......
Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk 2