I spotted this: http://changelog.bbqdroid.org/#bravo/cm9/next
Which seems to suggest a long history of nightly CM9 builds for the Bravo - but I've only got 7.2.0.1 on the device listing. I take it the link is incorrect rather than I just don't find the download and there really is CM9 coming to the Desire? What have I missed?
Thanks,
Matt.
CyanogenMod team does not offer even an experimental CM9 build for Desire so far, however there are several ROMs for Desire that are built using CM9 sources.
You might want to check this one:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1403113
Do you happen to know if they will be and official stable CM9 release for the HTC Desire, or will the last "official" one be CM7? I guess it might be considered too old/slow for a stable release.
I'm using Sandvold's ICS ROM (0.14) BTW which runs pretty smoothly .
Arite.
Is the PAC man ROM for the toroplus, maguro, toro, crespo etc etc etc?????
look in the dev section and you will see which gnex version its available for
.........
Thanks boss.....I am pretty sure I did that and usually on goo.im it will say which it is for but there is only one d/l i am seeing im going to check again.....I just wanted to ask: is there universal ROMS.....(ex. a developer only makes one rom but it is hybrid on ALL devices, it just has to be flashed, cache cleared, etc) I have read extensively about Android Rooting for a good year now, and I have NEVER seen something like that so I basically am answering my own question, but maybe I am wrong........
no there are no universal roms for the gnex.. you have to check if they are maguro or toro, and then flash the one that you have
It is for the gsm gnex I am currently in communication with the developer and I have a beta to test for the Verizon variant of the ROM. It cannot be released without testers though so if you know someone with the Verizon gnex and wouldn't mind testing the ROM just have them pm me. I have the ROM link. There will also be a toroplus version soon also.
whats going on did the the dev or devs ever port PACmann for toro plus??? I see team syence is that official or a port of a port got a topic/question for senior members and android rooting gurus..... Which ROM do you guys prefer and for what reason..... Jbsourcery4.3, paranoid android(latest builds) and for what reasons.... And would PACman ROM even compete with those two Roms.....? And those two ROMS r my preferences
MfartianCeo said:
It is for the gsm gnex I am currently in communication with the developer and I have a beta to test for the Verizon variant of the ROM. It cannot be released without testers though so if you know someone with the Verizon gnex and wouldn't mind testing the ROM just have them pm me. I have the ROM link. There will also be a toroplus version soon also.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
.....
Noticed there wasn't really any PAC builds for the toroplus. I just compiled one if anybody would be willing to test it as I don't have the device.
http://www.androidfilehost.com/?fid=22979706399752334
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda premium
I have Hboot 1.36 and I want a stable ROM. Would you recommend a ROM with either 4.1 or 4.2? For instance, Cyanogenmod has two ROMs for either 4.1 or 4.2.
Obviously 4.1 is more stable because it has been around longer.
In fact the "official" CM10.1 for One X hasn't been released yet.
TToivanen said:
Obviously 4.1 is more stable because it has been around longer.
In fact the "official" CM10.1 for One X hasn't been released yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How does this work then? http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1784185. I guess they took the CM10.1 source code that is in development and built their own implementation?
That is correct, if the dev gets it to a stable state on the one x, the cm team may make it the official build for this device
Sent from my EndeavorU using xda app-developers app
zettez said:
I have Hboot 1.36 and I want a stable ROM. Would you recommend a ROM with either 4.1 or 4.2? For instance, Cyanogenmod has two ROMs for either 4.1 or 4.2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
for sure 4.1 is more stable. cm 10 all hboot worked fine for me. link to cm10 post rom 4.1.2 is stable.:good:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1784185
Hey there.
I'm planning to trade my sensation for the one x. I have some questions.
What does the SD tag stand for, in the name of the ROMS?
What general knowledge can you pass on for me? I plan to root this, heard of the battery and bootloader bug (cannot charge in custom recovery or bootloader)
What general bugs are there for the one x with most of the roms?
How is 4.2.2 and CM going with development? - most roms I saw are sense.
How is driver porting/will htc release relevant kernel sources to keep development going?
Is it true that no S-off method has been devised yet, so you are stuck with just unlocked bootloader?
Thank you for your time.
STk3000 said:
Hey there.
I'm planning to trade my sensation for the one x. I have some questions.
What does the SD tag stand for, in the name of the ROMS?
What general knowledge can you pass on for me? I plan to root this, heard of the battery and bootloader bug (cannot charge in custom recovery or bootloader)
What general bugs are there for the one x with most of the roms?
How is 4.2.2 and CM going with development? - most roms I saw are sense.
How is driver porting/will htc release relevant kernel sources to keep development going?
Is it true that no S-off method has been devised yet, so you are stuck with just unlocked bootloader?
Thank you for your time.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1. I've never seen any SD tag...
2. ROM support is pretty solid, only thing bothering is the lack of S-OFF
3. You can charge in custom recovery and when the phone is powered off.
4. Sense ROMs are quite bugless since they're based on original firmware.
On AOSP major problems are:
Non functional MHL tv out
No bluetooth tether
In call volume adjustment in speaker mode broken
5. There's at least 3 different 4.2.2 ROMs in active development. Fully working except for the bugs described above.
6. HTC releases proper sources but they mostly come two-three months later than the ota release.
7. True.
Sent from my One X using xda premium
Hi, this is a question but because it isn't about the phone in the current form i thought it was better to put it here.
Rumours say the One X will not go past 4.2, but is it likely developers would be able to put it on? I know much older phones are able to get 4.1, 4.2 which only went up to 2 with manufacturers.
One X doesn't have S-OFF yet. And id expect you may need a later HBOOT for KLP? If it isn't released on the One X you wouldn't get that HBOOT. But for a developer to develop a later HBOOT it would need S-OFF right? If not then it is likely it will get i assume
It is 99% certain that devs will bring Android KLP for us.
It is possible to run JB4.2 on ICS hboot so I'd assume it's possible to run KLP on JB hboot as well.
Cheers for the reply Sounds like good news. Hope we get a sense version for KLP too.
I'm not sure if you're talking about the AOSP/CM/PA/AOKP KLP or Sense KLP, but either way, don't expect the One X to die soon take my old phone, the Xperia X8 for example. With limited source and limited devs, it managed to survive from Android 1.6 till Android 4.1.2 that's a device with a single core Qualcomm MSM7227 SoC with only 256 MB of RAM. I doubt the One X will die at 4.2.2, even if we don't receive it OFFICIALLY
i heard that the next update will be 4.3 and will be jellybean again
I meant Sense as i feel personally it has more features than ASOP/AKOP. And 4.3 hmmm. Been 4 for a while now, a 5 would be nice. Or if 4.3 had a few significant features. 4.2 wasn't very significant over 4.1 in all honesty.
RohinZaraki said:
I'm not sure if you're talking about the AOSP/CM/PA/AOKP KLP or Sense KLP, but either way, don't expect the One X to die soon take my old phone, the Xperia X8 for example. With limited source and limited devs, it managed to survive from Android 1.6 till Android 4.1.2 that's a device with a single core Qualcomm MSM7227 SoC with only 256 MB of RAM. I doubt the One X will die at 4.2.2, even if we don't receive it OFFICIALLY
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Totally agreed!! :good:
RohinZaraki said:
I'm not sure if you're talking about the AOSP/CM/PA/AOKP KLP or Sense KLP, but either way, don't expect the One X to die soon take my old phone, the Xperia X8 for example. With limited source and limited devs, it managed to survive from Android 1.6 till Android 4.1.2 that's a device with a single core Qualcomm MSM7227 SoC with only 256 MB of RAM. I doubt the One X will die at 4.2.2, even if we don't receive it OFFICIALLY
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't want it to die soon! I plan to keep my 11 month old one X for at least an year and a half more. Won't get a new phone before that. And it would kill me not to have the latest and the greatest on my beast.
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
TToivanen said:
It is possible to run JB4.2 on ICS hboot
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really? I'd like to know how, every single 4.2 rom requires JB HBOOT, and I'm stuck with ICS HBOOT (1.12).
Ambious said:
Really? I'd like to know how, every single 4.2 rom requires JB HBOOT, and I'm stuck with ICS HBOOT (1.12).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. Back in the day when JB sources were unreleased, every aosp-based ROM (even 4.2.x ones) ran kernels based on HTC's ICS kernel source.
---> ICS kernels work fine on ICS hboot
All you have to do is find an old jb4.2 ROM which contains ICS based kernel or kindly ask a ROM dev to build one for you.
GL my friend
Sent from my IceCold One X
TToivanen said:
Yes. Back in the day when JB sources were unreleased, every aosp-based ROM (even 4.2.x ones) ran kernels based on HTC's ICS kernel source.
---> ICS kernels work fine on ICS hboot
All you have to do is find an old jb4.2 ROM which contains ICS based kernel or kindly ask a ROM dev to build one for you.
GL my friend
Sent from my IceCold One X
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But would that work? Could I run a newer JB4.2 rom with an older ICS kernel?
Ambious said:
But would that work? Could I run a newer JB4.2 rom with an older ICS kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure I've done it myself.
For example, you can download cm10.1 alpha 2 from this thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1786696
It's clearly stated that older hboot is supported.
Sent from my IceCold One X
TToivanen said:
Sure I've done it myself.
For example, you can download cm10.1 alpha 2 from this thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1786696
It's clearly stated that older hboot is supported.
Sent from my IceCold One X
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Except they removed it from the hosting site
Thanks for the tip anyway.
Too bad I can't use newer versions and just over-ride the kernel.
Ambious said:
Except they removed it from the hosting site
Thanks for the tip anyway.
Too bad I can't use newer versions and just over-ride the kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know if simply flashing a custom ICS kernel over a ROM would work... Please try.
Also, tbalden is a nice guy, I'm sure he'll reupload the a2 for you or even build it if you just ask politely.
Mattmanwrx is using the old kernel: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2149747
Also any 4.1.2 aosp ROM should do the trick for example CM10, IceColdJelly 4.1.2, etc.
Sent from my IceCold One X
TToivanen said:
I don't know if simply flashing a custom ICS kernel over a ROM would work... Please try.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was going to, but I'm too afraid to mess something up.
[quote[
Mattmanwrx is using the old kernel: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2149747[/QUOTE]
Wow, not sure how I didn't know about this. Gonna use this instead of the current (out of date) CM10. Thanks