Develop Bugs

Did I Brick? Stuck at Android Recovery Screen

Rooted...no issue there.
Installed ROM Manger.
Installed Clockwork Recovery from Rom Manager as I wanted to install a new rom.
Now when I boot, no matter what combination I hold down, it goes to the Android System Recovery screen and in the background is the white triangle, yellow exclamation point and little android guy.
I can move between the three ofered choices but pressing the power button (I assume this is the OK button) does nothing.
Thoughts / help?

Does your computer recognize it? If it does you should try adb download and see if you can get into download mode
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium

Have you even tried pressing any of the soft keys, home button?
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium

Just realized I posted the question in the wrong forum as well.
Computer makes a noise as though it knows it's connected, yet it doesn't show up and odin and kies don't find it either.

I think home button is select and power button is back, but I haven't used stock in a long time, so might be remembering incorrectly.
I suggest you don't use Rom Manager to install recovery. It doesn't work properly for this phone and could lead to non-recoverable problems.
Read this thread and you'll have references to everything you need to undo and start from scratch:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1342728

THANKS!
What a doof........hit the home button and all is fixed!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

jfenton57 said:
What a doof........hit the home button and all is fixed!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And leave stupid ROM manager alone it's crap on Samsung
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium

I don't know for the life of me why people still use Rom manager to install roms.

I think they are probably HTC converts because nothing here is asking them to use ROM manager.

jordan2333 said:
I don't know for the life of me why people still use Rom manager to install roms.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lazy lazy and most don't know how to do it correctly....
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium

sfhub said:
I think they are probably HTC converts because nothing here is asking them to use ROM manager.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I came over from an Evo and believe me everything pointed to not use Rom Manager when I had my phone as well. I agree that if people took the time to read properly they would see that Rom Manager and a few other crazy things they do are not suggested. But they make sure to have time to post and read their threads when they screw up. Honestly with all the brick laying and blue light specials up in herrre. Do you really need to post your problem and how do you fix it...
His problem is one of 100 exactly the same in here and instead of searching and helping himself he did the same lazy thing that got him stuck in the first place. Then too lazy to find out how to work CWM. Quite sure he will be back again if he keeps up this route... @OP not trying to be an ass but just hate to see people who don't want to help themselves.

Sorry to hear that you've bricked OP. Hope you can get a replacement and get back into owning your phone.
Here's what I've done to avoid bricking since I am also somewhat new to the E4GT...
Read the forums on XDA.
Observed what others are doing that worked.
Didn't flash anything you are unsure of.
Became familiar with ODIN.
Stayed away from ROM manager.
Flashed using el29 rogue recovery only. (I've been successful with this so far, others say to use el26.)
Wipd cache/dalvik-cache/data/system.
Purchased mobile ODIN, $5 is better than the deductible to get a replacement.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium

I bricked but it was a bad recovery well not bad just messy team trolls recovery bricked me 2 weeks ago wiping Cache . But as always when u post questions like this here ur gonna hear it lol but searching helps.
Now if its hard bricked ud not even get to recovery at all just a blue light and a black screen that if is ur case unplug it cause it runs the battery super hot .
If not in that position than try power and volume down if it does not bring u to download mode to Odin another recovery if that don't work idk
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium

sfhub said:
I think they are probably HTC converts because nothing here is asking them to use ROM manager.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The OG Epic uses ROM Manager just fine.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2 Beta-2

azyouthinkeyeiz said:
The OG Epic uses ROM Manager just fine.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2 Beta-2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That took a long time and a ton of porting. Pretty recent. Went through Eclair and Froyo without support.

The Root said:
That took a long time and a ton of porting. Pretty recent. Went through Eclair and Froyo without support.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Porting was needed for CWM recovery. Not ROM Manager. Support for ROM Manager comes from device devs, not koush. In the form of uploading vetted software, that doesn't corrupt. It is a universal starting point, not a fully functional product.
But regardless, I wasn't even talking about it's support. I was saying people other than ones with HTC devices can get into the habit of using ROM Manager.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2 Beta-2

azyouthinkeyeiz said:
Porting was needed for CWM recovery. Not ROM Manager. Support for ROM Manager comes from device devs, not koush. In the form of uploading vetted software, that doesn't corrupt. It is a universal starting point, not a fully functional product.
But regardless, I wasn't even talking about it's support. I was saying people other than ones with HTC devices can get into the habit of using ROM Manager.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2 Beta-2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I never used it even when there was support. Lol
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA App

Doesn't matter the recovery is in the kernel and rom manager will not work on this phone ....there is no separate recovery partition and ROM manager won't flash the recovery right on here since it's part of the kernel partition.koush doesn't really care he made it to temporarily flash a recovery like touch that might work if not for ics kernels... The thing is it doesn't work people should not rely on it like a crutch
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium

[Q] TWRP vs CWM

I've only ever used CWM before. What exactly is TWRP and how is it better? I did hear that the new version can handle encrypted phones which sounds important to me. I use AOKP with a CMPlus kernel. Thanks
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

Faster backups and has compression
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus

agreed with above and you can theme it
by me, for me and I love you

Ive had issues with bad restores on TWRP as well as a few others I know where force closes would randomly start happening I don't see any difference other than themeing which is nice but reliability > customization.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

ÜBER™ said:
Ive had issues with bad restores on TWRP as well as a few others I know where force closes would randomly start happening I don't see any difference other than themeing which is nice but reliability > customization.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Interesting. I'm interested in TWRP because it let's you read/flash from an encrypted /sdcard
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

ive had no problems with it. i made the switch because i needed the compression.

fbiryujin said:
Interesting. I'm interested in TWRP because it let's you read/flash from an encrypted /sdcard
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well don't let my experience keep you from it. Its usually reliable. But I did have some issues. Just to let you know it can mess up sometimes.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

ÜBER™ said:
Well don't let my experience keep you from it. Its usually reliable. But I did have some issues. Just to let you know it can mess up sometimes.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and thats why i dont use cwm, because it tends to mess up/has bugs. ive never had a problem with twrp.

simms22 said:
and thats why i dont use cwm, because it tends to mess up/has bugs. ive never had a problem with twrp.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Huh? I've never er had issues with cwm... can't say that for twrp...
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

fbiryujin said:
I've only ever used CWM before. What exactly is TWRP and how is it better? I did hear that the new version can handle encrypted phones which sounds important to me. I use AOKP with a CMPlus kernel. Thanks
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Better or worse depends on what you want I guess.
I use CWM 5.5.0.2 because it is extremely stable, and it is NON-touch. The touch-enabled CWM is NOT stable.
For me, having a touch-enabled recovery is silly -- I am in recovery to fix something or flash something, and I don't need a touch interface where I can accidentally touch the screen and it will do something I don't want. And I certainly do not want themes on my recovery. Hell, I don't even use themes on my ROMs...
From my point of view, the only benefits to using TWRP is the ability to decrypt data while in recovery (although I don't use encryption, so...) and compression. I can't comment on TWRP stability, as I have not used it long enough.

efrant said:
Better or worse depends on what you want I guess.
I use CWM 5.5.0.2 because it is extremely stable, and it is NON-touch. The touch-enabled CWM is NOT stable.
For me, having a touch-enabled recovery is silly -- I am in recovery to fix something or flash something, and I don't need a touch interface where I can accidentally touch the screen and it will do something I don't want. And I certainly do not want themes on my recovery. Hell, I don't even use themes on my ROMs...
From my point of view, the only benefits to using TWRP is the ability to decrypt data while in recovery (although I don't use encryption, so...) and compression. I can't comment on TWRP stability, as I have not used it long enough.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Very well said
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app

Thanks everyone. I'm going to play with TWRP later and if it appears stable I'll use it and encrypt. I'm a very privacy conscious person.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

I did some research and TWRP looked good. I installed TWRP yesterday. I've made a backup and its very quick. I did not restore yet. I too have not had enough seat time to comment on reliability. .
I'm still confused whether or not I have to or should remove CWM apps or leave them installed? I paid for CWM touch. No biggie I spend more for a coffee at Starbucks.
Is it OK to leave both installed and to go back and forth between the two recoveries if needed? Is anyone keeping both available?
I understand the backups are not interchangeable.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

rjcapp said:
I did some research and TWRP looked good. I installed TWRP yesterday. I've made a backup and its very quick. I did not restore yet. I too have not had enough seat time to comment on reliability. .
I'm still confused whether or not I have to or should remove CWM apps or leave them installed? I paid for CWM touch. No biggie I spend more for a coffee at Starbucks.
Is it OK to leave both installed and to go back and forth between the two recoveries if needed? Is anyone keeping both available?
I understand the backups are not interchangeable.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes I would leave both back ups installed because you never know if twrp will mess up or clwmod but I highly doubt clwmod will. They are not interchangeable but clwmod can be flashed through rom manager in case your twrp fails and your not near your PC. I wouldn't use rom manager for nothing else but to flash clwmod its very unstable.
---------- Post added at 08:27 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:07 PM ----------
I'm using twrp and I have been looking for a thread like this and I'm glad its came about because lately I have had some zip files that will flash but doesn't get applied I'm using twrp but have always used clwm.
This is what I want to know and I'm hoping for a very experienced xda member to help me make my decision. I have problems making decisions when I don't have enough info or I'm not satisfied with the info I have read. I have scoured google and I have read as much as I can on the differences but there's not much on which is better. My last question is if I choose to go back to clockwmod and if I do it won't be touch is it better to flash a zip or can I count on rom manager to flash it because I won't use it to do anything else only because im a firm believer in if you can't flash manually then you shouldn't be flashing. Thanks in advance
---------- Post added at 08:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:27 PM ----------
I'm using twrp and I have been looking for a thread like this and I'm glad its came about because lately I have had some zip files that will flash but doesn't get applied I'm using twrp but have always used clwm.
This is what I want to know and I'm hoping for a very experienced xda member to help me make my decision. I have problems making decisions when I don't have enough info or I'm not satisfied with the info I have read. I have scoured google and I have read as much as I can on the differences but there's not much on which is better. My last question is if I choose to go back to clockwmod and if I do it won't be touch is it better to flash a zip or can I count on rom manager to flash it because I won't use it to do anything else only because im a firm believer in if you can't flash manually then you shouldn't be flashing. Only reason for asking if its safe to do through rm is because I can't download the zip through clockwmods web site it must be down. Thanks in advance

Smelkus or TWRP?

Any thoughts on this one?
smelkus said:
Thought I'd mention, I'm no longer working on this recovery (if you couldn't tell ). The base is pretty dated now and beyond my ability to bring to new devices. TWRP is an awesome recovery, so I'd look for that on your new phones and tablets. Zip queues are sweet and while there is no auto-reboot it's not that big of a deal since it backs ups and restores so fast. You can check them out here or in your respective device forum. I really appreciate everyone who liked this recovery. I went from bugging drellisdee to learning how to make it on my own and that was a really great experience.
Right now, I'm trying to pitch in on ParanoidAndroid for the Nexus 7 when possible and hope to upgrade my phone soon (waiting for my contract to expire late November and for what Google has to say on 10/29). Thanks again everybody!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my PC36100 using xda app-developers app

There are plenty of us still using Smelkus without any issues. I've used it with much success. Boils down to personal preference, really. Haven't used TWRP since version 1.0, but it's good, too. Just stay away from ClockworkMod and you'll be fine.
Sent using my HTC EVO 4G and a magic wand

I'm sticking with what i know works,i like the TWRP touch,but Smelkus has been good to me,why fix something that isnt broken.

I prefer to use Smelkus. As far as TWRP goes, my only *true* issue is the fact that it takes like a minute for my phone to load TWRP when I boot into recovery. When I boot into Smelkus, it takes no more than 10 secs. Maybe it's just my phone, but I know that I'm not willing to wait that long for my recovery to load.
______________________________
HTC Evo 4g

TWRP for me... I use it on my kindle fire and evo 4g and it's been solid.
Sent from my Kindle Fire using xda app-developers app

Smelkus is the best, takes everything from amon RA and adds to it. I just can't trust a touch recovery that says "no bricks" in the open. And with smelkus if the capacitive buttons fail you can still use the volume rockers and power button to select things.
Sent from my PC36100 using xda app-developers app

I've been using Smelkus for quite a while now and absolutely love it. It works great and does exactly what I need it to do!!!

Simple port request

Ok guys, before I get flamed for not doing it myself I gotta say that my build system is down ATM. This is a simple thing to do, I just don't have the resources to do it. If anyone would be willing to port this for Toro, that would be AWESOME. It's a new recovery.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2201860
Like I said, I would do it if my computer wasn't down right now. Thanks for anyone willing to do this.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 4 Beta

Why isn't anybody interested? :/
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 4 Beta

yepitsme19 said:
Why isn't anybody interested? :/
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 4 Beta
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well where to start?
Its just another recovery since the unique features of it will not be open sourced by the dev.
What features of it intrigue you the most? I mean I spend all of ten minutes a week in recovery. I have no need for anything else in recovery other than what I currently have.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus

Pirateghost said:
Well where to start?
Its just another recovery since the unique features of it will not be open sourced by the dev.
What features of it intrigue you the most? I mean I spend all of ten minutes a week in recovery. I have no need for anything else in recovery other than what I currently have.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For me, CWM is ok, but it lacks the spice of TWRP. On the other hand, TWRP is like a cheap ass Android phone. It works, but completely ruins the experience. This is like CWM on steroids. If you read the OP it says 99% of it is open, just not the touch code like CWM. I feel that this is what I have personally been missing in a recovery.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 4 Beta

yepitsme19 said:
For me, CWM is ok, but it lacks the spice of TWRP. On the other hand, TWRP is like a cheap ass Android phone. It works, but completely ruins the experience. This is like CWM on steroids. If you read the OP it says 99% of it is open, just not the touch code like CWM. I feel that this is what I have personally been missing in a recovery.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 4 Beta
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't quite understand what the "spice of TWRP" and the "experience" of Android in a recovery are. To me, the two recoveries do the same thing; the only reason I use TWRP is that it is touch, and I have had bad experiences with broken buttons from overuse. So I need to agree with pirateghost; I don't see the appeal.

Pirateghost said:
Well where to start?
Its just another recovery since the unique features of it will not be open sourced by the dev.
What features of it intrigue you the most? I mean I spend all of ten minutes a week in recovery. I have no need for anything else in recovery other than what I currently have.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All features are open sourced except touch recovery.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app

Grarak said:
All features are open sourced except touch recovery.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Missing Features from github source:
- all gui options, include touch code
- name the backup folder with current ROM name
- custom zip install menu (Free Browse Mode + custom startup folder)
- Create Update.zip from current ROM or from pre-existing backups
- misc nandroid settings menu (but /preload is included by default and I added option to toggle compression under backup format menu)
Please, do not ask for touch source, I will never share it, release it public or make it commercial...
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus

Pirateghost said:
Missing Features from github source:
- all gui options, include touch code
- name the backup folder with current ROM name
- custom zip install menu (Free Browse Mode + custom startup folder)
- Create Update.zip from current ROM or from pre-existing backups
- misc nandroid settings menu (but /preload is included by default and I added option to toggle compression under backup format menu)
Please, do not ask for touch source, I will never share it, release it public or make it commercial...
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I see. Didn't read that.

bananagranola said:
I don't quite understand what the "spice of TWRP" and the "experience" of Android in a recovery are. To me, the two recoveries do the same thing; the only reason I use TWRP is that it is touch, and I have had bad experiences with broken buttons from overuse. So I need to agree with pirateghost; I don't see the appeal.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You do know there's a CWM with touch right ? ;]

madd0g said:
You do know there's a CWM with touch right ? ;]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I do, but I never got around to trying it since TWRP works anyway. Like I said, my recovery doesn't really matter to me as long as it works. Does it have any special advantages?

Got my build system up and running finally. Working on syncing some source now then I'll get this going probably tomorrow or so. If anyone is interested just let me know and I'll get it posted in the dev section
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 4 Beta

bananagranola said:
Yeah I do, but I never got around to trying it since TWRP works anyway. Like I said, my recovery doesn't really matter to me as long as it works. Does it have any special advantages?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Compared to non touch ? Not really, I've started using it because I wanted to save the button wear, but since 4.1.2 I'm not seeing the recovery much anyway (using stock Google image). I tried TWRP, but went back quickly, since I was more familiar with CWM and didn't want to waste time relearning/trying something that I wasn't aware of how it all works when needed.
As for regarding recovery "features" some would probably want working radio in it and use it as a phone ...

Any word on this?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 4 Beta

MisterSprinkles said:
Any word on this?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 4 Beta
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any word on what? At this time the only useful aspect of this is the standard recovery features we already have with 2 other recoveries. Since he won't open source the only bits that make it unique it seems like a waste of time.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus

Pirateghost said:
Any word on what? At this time the only useful aspect of this is the standard recovery features we already have with 2 other recoveries. Since he won't open source the only bits that make it unique it seems like a waste of time.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think he means from OP:
yepitsme19 said:
Got my build system up and running finally. Working on syncing some source now then I'll get this going probably tomorrow or so. If anyone is interested just let me know and I'll get it posted in the dev section
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 4 Beta
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

Looks like Phil just posted it in the Toro section! http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2281571

TWRP to me is pretty horrible. CWM is simple and it works. Ive used it from the start and never had any problems. also the latest version of CWM supports Toro (obviously) and is also touch. Not sure why the OP wants this one to be honest.

[Q] Which recovery is the best?

I recently used rumrunner to gain s-off and root and I flashed CWM recovery. I have read different posts stating CWM is flaky on the One, and I've also read posts saying TWRP is flaky. Can anyone clear this up?

I've used TWRP on almost every device I've had and have never had an issue with it. I'm currently using TWRP with no issues.
Sent from my HTC One using xda app-developers app

I used TWRP and had no problems. I'm a noob at all this and I couldn't have asked for it to have been easier.
Sent from my One using xda app-developers app

irie27 said:
I recently used rumrunner to gain s-off and root and I flashed CWM recovery. I have read different posts stating CWM is flaky on the One, and I've also read posts saying TWRP is flaky. Can anyone clear this up?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cwm is flaky period not just on the one. Twrp has been the only real choice for years.
Sent from my HTC6500LVW using xda app-developers app

I have had nothing but good luck with CWM myself.
Sent from my HTC6500LVW using XDA Premium 4 mobile app

TWRP and Story time
I'm currently using TWRP with no issues, and never had any, starting way back on the OG Evo.
I do remember installing clockwork on the old school T-Mobile G1 (Dream) and I didn't have any issues. Koush spearheaded the recovery project for us, he will always have that title of being the 'first' with his clockworkmod's. (a tip of the hat to Koush)
Reminds me a little of this story I learned a while back. I heard it was true too...
The importance of a beginning in anything isn't always about that first product or creation in the project. The importance is whether the original design and goal is met at the end and/or in the end product. I.E. Adam.
He was the first to be created of humanity but the original purpose for his creation did not meet all of the requirements of his Creator. Instead of scrapping the original product and starting anew, there was a plan to restore and rectify on the original project, or as i like to call it, the original "storyline".
The similarity of this story to the OP takes a turn here. Where as Koush didn't fully rectify his original product (Clockworkmod) and make a better one, the Creator of humanity did indeed follow up on His promise to begin in the restoration of the original design of His story: the "Second Adam".
One was born from the dust of the earth (ie 'first' Adam; the other birthed from the Spirit of God in Heaven ('Second' Adam).
The first Adam was born perfect but ultimately failed in its original design and purpose. But alas, One had come, the Second Adam, who did not fall or fail, but came, conquered ,and was victorious in all that man was suppose to represent and so so much more...

I use cwm just because I like it better, I've had no issues so far with it. Once 4ext is available I'll be using that, best I've used to date.
Sent from my HTC6500LVW using XDA Premium 4 mobile app

Truthfully I was CWM all day every phone no matter what.
I wouldn't even give TWRP a chance, once I did though, I never looked back, haven't been back on CWM since either.
I do have a gripe with a menu set up. Nothing major and enough for me to change. I highly suggest TWRP.

I like TWRP more. Better UI, navigation and features. That said, I use CWM. After experiencing bugs and instability with TWRP on the S4, I returned to the recovery that has never failed me, CWM.
Sent from my HTC6500LVW using Tapatalk now Free

I use TWRP and have no complaints. Never did with CWM either. The winner for me is TWRP though, because I like being able to add multiple zip files to flash at once instead of flashing them one at-a-time with CWM, not a big deal but saves some time.

I would love to see 4ext make a comeback. Best recovery ever.
Sent from my HTC6500LVWBLU using Tapatalk 4
If I've helped, please hit the thanks button

tylerlawhon said:
I would love to see 4ext make a comeback. Best recovery ever.
Sent from my HTC6500LVWBLU using Tapatalk 4
If I've helped, please hit the thanks button
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just actually received an email from max about 4ext for the One. In short - the framework of his recovery needs an overhall to work with the larger resolutions, multi-cores, etc. He has a lot of work ahead of him so if he does try to revamp it for the One it will be some time. But I would switch from TWRP to 4ext in a heartbeat...handsdown the best.

brymaster5000 said:
I just actually received an email from max about 4ext for the One. In short - the framework of his recovery needs an overhall to work with the larger resolutions, multi-cores, etc. He has a lot of work ahead of him so if he does try to revamp it for the One it will be some time. But I would switch from TWRP to 4ext in a heartbeat...handsdown the best.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same here. I love twrp, but pales so hard in comparison with 4ext
Sent from my HTC6500LVWBLU using Tapatalk 4
If I've helped, please hit the thanks button

tylerlawhon said:
Same here. I love twrp, but pales so hard in comparison with 4ext
Sent from my HTC6500LVWBLU using Tapatalk 4
If I've helped, please hit the thanks button
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1.
I actually forgot all about this recovery.
The best.

Anyone who uses CWM is a commie... Lol

cstrife999 said:
Anyone who uses CWM is a commie... Lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I use CWM

Flyhalf205 said:
I use CWM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Almost anyone in that case lol

I used cwm with the original droid and it worked fine but when newer phones came out I noticed issues like on my dinc and bolt I had backups that was corrupted and I wasn't happy and moved to twrp and never had an issue since. I did move to 4ext with the bolt and that must say was the best over all. I miss 4ext when I got rid of the bolt but hope it comes to the one soon. It was so user friendly.

I've used CWM on my HP tablet, installed on a few other phones. Honestly, I've never given TWRP a chance. Is there anything I'm missing by not using it. I guess I'm just more used to the look and feel of CWM
Sent from my HTC6500LVW using XDA Premium 4 mobile app