Develop Bugs

Customizing unlock screen

Is there a way for me to add items on a lock screen (where I unlock screen and or can turn on camera)?
Ooh yeah, on stock phone(without root)
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1627105
This thread literally was created 15 min ago.

martonikaj said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1627105
This thread literally was created 15 min ago.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so it can't be done w/ stock? i dont really want to install 3rd party app for unlock screen

a1exus said:
so it can't be done w/ stock? i dont really want to install 3rd party app for unlock screen
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You need at least a rom cook
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

I enjoy using MIUI Locker

Gforce083 said:
I enjoy using MIUI Locker
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He does not want a 3rd app
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Just root the phone for god sake .
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA

Okaay said:
Just root the phone for god sake .
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why? I don't want to run custom ROM
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

a1exus said:
Why? I don't want to run custom ROM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then you get no custom lock screen.
I'm in the same boat you are. I rooted my phone, but at least for the time being, I don't want to use a custom ROM. With that choice comes sacrifices. I'll likely never get a % battery mod or a custom lock screen. Life is full of choices.

a1exus said:
Why? I don't want to run custom ROM
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
then you give up the custom lockscreen without using a third party app.

im trying to root my optimus v but i just made an account and can't post in the thread i want because i need 10 posts.

for me stability of my phone is very important and custom rom doesn't really give me that feeling just yet, there is always something issues going on...
back in the days the reason why i went w/ cm7 vs stock rom is because it was cleaner, now that I have ICS its pretty clean as it comes, developer puts in his own tweaks what he feels is important (may not be important to me) and with that comes some unstable/untested code which i'm not ready to do beta testing
so i'm fine w/ stock rom and i'm loving it, of course someone may not think this way and want to go w/ cm9 nightly or some other custom rom its up to this person (who am I to tell otherwise)
i just wanted to know if maybe i missed something and it can be done with stock rom, but apparently thats not the case (or at least doesn't seems so)

I think you might want to try out one of the custom roms first. I thought that too. But these roms seem to be a whole different level of professionally coded compared to the cm7 days. Aokp to start with, then expand if necessary to paradigm etc. I think you'll be surprised, you're getting stock stability with extras.

[Q] TWRP vs CWM

I've only ever used CWM before. What exactly is TWRP and how is it better? I did hear that the new version can handle encrypted phones which sounds important to me. I use AOKP with a CMPlus kernel. Thanks
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

Faster backups and has compression
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus

agreed with above and you can theme it
by me, for me and I love you

Ive had issues with bad restores on TWRP as well as a few others I know where force closes would randomly start happening I don't see any difference other than themeing which is nice but reliability > customization.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

ÜBER™ said:
Ive had issues with bad restores on TWRP as well as a few others I know where force closes would randomly start happening I don't see any difference other than themeing which is nice but reliability > customization.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Interesting. I'm interested in TWRP because it let's you read/flash from an encrypted /sdcard
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

ive had no problems with it. i made the switch because i needed the compression.

fbiryujin said:
Interesting. I'm interested in TWRP because it let's you read/flash from an encrypted /sdcard
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well don't let my experience keep you from it. Its usually reliable. But I did have some issues. Just to let you know it can mess up sometimes.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

ÜBER™ said:
Well don't let my experience keep you from it. Its usually reliable. But I did have some issues. Just to let you know it can mess up sometimes.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and thats why i dont use cwm, because it tends to mess up/has bugs. ive never had a problem with twrp.

simms22 said:
and thats why i dont use cwm, because it tends to mess up/has bugs. ive never had a problem with twrp.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Huh? I've never er had issues with cwm... can't say that for twrp...
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

fbiryujin said:
I've only ever used CWM before. What exactly is TWRP and how is it better? I did hear that the new version can handle encrypted phones which sounds important to me. I use AOKP with a CMPlus kernel. Thanks
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Better or worse depends on what you want I guess.
I use CWM 5.5.0.2 because it is extremely stable, and it is NON-touch. The touch-enabled CWM is NOT stable.
For me, having a touch-enabled recovery is silly -- I am in recovery to fix something or flash something, and I don't need a touch interface where I can accidentally touch the screen and it will do something I don't want. And I certainly do not want themes on my recovery. Hell, I don't even use themes on my ROMs...
From my point of view, the only benefits to using TWRP is the ability to decrypt data while in recovery (although I don't use encryption, so...) and compression. I can't comment on TWRP stability, as I have not used it long enough.

efrant said:
Better or worse depends on what you want I guess.
I use CWM 5.5.0.2 because it is extremely stable, and it is NON-touch. The touch-enabled CWM is NOT stable.
For me, having a touch-enabled recovery is silly -- I am in recovery to fix something or flash something, and I don't need a touch interface where I can accidentally touch the screen and it will do something I don't want. And I certainly do not want themes on my recovery. Hell, I don't even use themes on my ROMs...
From my point of view, the only benefits to using TWRP is the ability to decrypt data while in recovery (although I don't use encryption, so...) and compression. I can't comment on TWRP stability, as I have not used it long enough.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Very well said
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app

Thanks everyone. I'm going to play with TWRP later and if it appears stable I'll use it and encrypt. I'm a very privacy conscious person.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

I did some research and TWRP looked good. I installed TWRP yesterday. I've made a backup and its very quick. I did not restore yet. I too have not had enough seat time to comment on reliability. .
I'm still confused whether or not I have to or should remove CWM apps or leave them installed? I paid for CWM touch. No biggie I spend more for a coffee at Starbucks.
Is it OK to leave both installed and to go back and forth between the two recoveries if needed? Is anyone keeping both available?
I understand the backups are not interchangeable.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

rjcapp said:
I did some research and TWRP looked good. I installed TWRP yesterday. I've made a backup and its very quick. I did not restore yet. I too have not had enough seat time to comment on reliability. .
I'm still confused whether or not I have to or should remove CWM apps or leave them installed? I paid for CWM touch. No biggie I spend more for a coffee at Starbucks.
Is it OK to leave both installed and to go back and forth between the two recoveries if needed? Is anyone keeping both available?
I understand the backups are not interchangeable.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes I would leave both back ups installed because you never know if twrp will mess up or clwmod but I highly doubt clwmod will. They are not interchangeable but clwmod can be flashed through rom manager in case your twrp fails and your not near your PC. I wouldn't use rom manager for nothing else but to flash clwmod its very unstable.
---------- Post added at 08:27 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:07 PM ----------
I'm using twrp and I have been looking for a thread like this and I'm glad its came about because lately I have had some zip files that will flash but doesn't get applied I'm using twrp but have always used clwm.
This is what I want to know and I'm hoping for a very experienced xda member to help me make my decision. I have problems making decisions when I don't have enough info or I'm not satisfied with the info I have read. I have scoured google and I have read as much as I can on the differences but there's not much on which is better. My last question is if I choose to go back to clockwmod and if I do it won't be touch is it better to flash a zip or can I count on rom manager to flash it because I won't use it to do anything else only because im a firm believer in if you can't flash manually then you shouldn't be flashing. Thanks in advance
---------- Post added at 08:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:27 PM ----------
I'm using twrp and I have been looking for a thread like this and I'm glad its came about because lately I have had some zip files that will flash but doesn't get applied I'm using twrp but have always used clwm.
This is what I want to know and I'm hoping for a very experienced xda member to help me make my decision. I have problems making decisions when I don't have enough info or I'm not satisfied with the info I have read. I have scoured google and I have read as much as I can on the differences but there's not much on which is better. My last question is if I choose to go back to clockwmod and if I do it won't be touch is it better to flash a zip or can I count on rom manager to flash it because I won't use it to do anything else only because im a firm believer in if you can't flash manually then you shouldn't be flashing. Only reason for asking if its safe to do through rm is because I can't download the zip through clockwmods web site it must be down. Thanks in advance

Rom manager asking to install cwm when I already have it.

Hi all,
I have a galaxy note 2.
I rooted it and installed supersu and cwm touch 6.0.1.9
But when I installed rom manager it asks me to install cwm recovery.
Maybe because I am using the free version ?
I can't flash roms cuz I don't want normal recovery.
Please help me
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda app-developers app

so u done something wrong if u still booting into stock recovery
i suggest u to try TWRP recovery its great and fast and easier to use
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1938733

It is a known bug with rom manager...It does not recognize if cwm is already installed. ... ignore it and go ahead with reboot to recovery
handwritten from my note 2 (N7100)

yahyoh said:
so u done something wrong if u still booting into stock recovery
i suggest u to try TWRP recovery its great and fast and easier to use
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1938733
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No i have cwm touch 6.0.1.9 touch recovery which i can boot into and use.
i myself like twrp but i think there is more support for cwm.
if there is any advantage of cwm or disadvantage of twrp, you can share.
pakure said:
It is a known bug with rom manager...It does not recognize if cwm is already installed. ... ignore it and go ahead with reboot to recovery
handwritten from my note 2 (N7100)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i rebooted into recovery but i want to flash cyanogenmod.

ROM MANAGER IS NOT TO BE USED WITH SAMSUNG DEVICES.
eot

Click Menu > Manual Flash Override. Then ROM Manager will acknowledge your currently installed recovery. However, if you're using TWRP, don't use ROM Manager! Enjoy!
As for flashing CyanogenMod, download it from get.cm and Google search for gapps. Then manually flash in CWM Touch.
Sent from my GT-N7100 using XDA Premium HD app

victorator said:
ROM MANAGER IS NOT TO BE USED WITH SAMSUNG DEVICES.
eot
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow but i used it on mine, it didn't affect me. and i supports note 2 doesn't it?
anyways i have installed twrp
Mister_Mxyzptlk said:
Click Menu > Manual Flash Override. Then ROM Manager will acknowledge your currently installed recovery. However, if you're using TWRP, don't use ROM Manager! Enjoy!
As for flashing CyanogenMod, download it from get.cm and Google search for gapps. Then manually flash in CWM Touch.
Sent from my GT-N7100 using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yep, i am intelligent enough to not use rom manager with twrp
i didn't like cm10.1 much but i will still wait for stable release and try it out.

UtkarshGupta said:
yep, i am intelligent enough to not use rom manager with twrp
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Shame you weren't intelligent enough to post in the question section.

UtkarshGupta said:
Wow but i used it on mine, it didn't affect me. and i supports note 2 doesn't it?
anyways i have installed twrp
yep, i am intelligent enough to not use rom manager with twrp
i didn't like cm10.1 much but i will still wait for stable release and try it out.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Saturday, December 22, 2012
UtkarshGupta:
Ya'. I know that the bugginess and lack of S-Pen support in CM 10.1 pre-release nightlies can be a bit trying. However, once a stable build of CM 10.1 is out, I think you'll be able to overlook the lack of S-Pen support and truly enjoy it. In the past, I've always been able to. Custom ROMs are almost always a matter of preference and opinion. However, when it comes to modified "stock" ROMs versus AOSP-based ROMs, the AOSP-based ROMs are almost always better. And that's not a statement of opinion; that's a statement of fact. AOSP-based ROMs are almost always cleaner, smoother, faster, and once finalized, more stable.
So now that you have ROM Manager working with your preferred custom recovery, I suggest you play around and try out some modifications, kernels, ROMs, etc.... and once a stable build of CM 10.1 is out, give it a second try. I think you'll find it more than adequate for daily use, and quite appealing for root and power use.
I hope my post has been helpful and I wish you the best of luck in modifying your device. Always remember to backup your EFS and do a Nandroid backup before any modifications, tweaks, or kernel/ROM flashing. Take care and have a good one! Thank you!
Thanks,
Edward (Mister_Mxyzptlk)
Sent from my GT-N7100 using XDA Premium HD app

Mister_Mxyzptlk said:
Saturday, December 22, 2012
UtkarshGupta:
Ya'. I know that the bugginess and lack of S-Pen support in CM 10.1 pre-release nightlies can be a bit trying. However, once a stable build of CM 10.1 is out, I think you'll be able to overlook the lack of S-Pen support and truly enjoy it. In the past, I've always been able to. Custom ROMs are almost always a matter of preference and opinion. However, when it comes to modified "stock" ROMs versus AOSP-based ROMs, the AOSP-based ROMs are almost always better. And that's not a statement of opinion; that's a statement of fact. AOSP-based ROMs are almost always cleaner, smoother, faster, and once finalized, more stable.
So now that you have ROM Manager working with your preferred custom recovery, I suggest you play around and try out some modifications, kernels, ROMs, etc.... and once a stable build of CM 10.1 is out, give it a second try. I think you'll find it more than adequate for daily use, and quite appealing for root and power use.
I hope my post has been helpful and I wish you the best of luck in modifying your device. Always remember to backup your EFS and do a Nandroid backup before any modifications, tweaks, or kernel/ROM flashing. Take care and have a good one! Thank you!
Thanks,
Edward (Mister_Mxyzptlk)
Sent from my GT-N7100 using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think s pen is one of the main features of note 2 the 'highlights'
I don't think i can simply overlook the lack of features of s pen, as i am used to it now.
anyways thank you for opinion

UtkarshGupta said:
I think s pen is one of the main features of note 2 the 'highlights'
I don't think i can simply overlook the lack of features of s pen, as i am used to it now.
anyways thank you for opinion
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah. I hear ya'. If the S-Pen was actually one of the major selling points that lured you into buying the Note, and if you use the advanced S-Pen features regularly, then I guess there really isn't any way to overlook it. I love the S-Pen. However, I find that I don't miss it's advanced features quite so much when I've got a stable, smooth, and blazing fast AOSP ROM on my device. However, as you appear to be somewhat more dependant on the S-Pen's advanced features than me, it really wouldn't make sense for you to give all that up just for an AOSP ROM. However, on that note, there are some really well put together modified "stock" ROMs available in the regular development forum. They all contain full S-Pen support. One of those may be more to your liking if you're not inclined to stay completely stock. Just a suggestion. Anyway, I hope you find a ROM that's a good fit for you. I know it can be difficult; so... good luck!
Take care and have a good one man!! Later!!
Sent from my GT-N8010 using XDA Premium HD app

Mister_Mxyzptlk said:
Yeah. I hear ya'. If the S-Pen was actually one of the major selling points that lured you into buying the Note, and if you use the advanced S-Pen features regularly, then I guess there really isn't any way to overlook it. I love the S-Pen. However, I find that I don't miss it's advanced features quite so much when I've got a stable, smooth, and blazing fast AOSP ROM on my device. However, as you appear to be somewhat more dependant on the S-Pen's advanced features than me, it really wouldn't make sense for you to give all that up just for an AOSP ROM. However, on that note, there are some really well put together modified "stock" ROMs available in the regular development forum. They all contain full S-Pen support. One of those may be more to your liking if you're not inclined to stay completely stock. Just a suggestion. Anyway, I hope you find a ROM that's a good fit for you. I know it can be difficult; so... good luck!
Take care and have a good one man!! Later!!
Sent from my GT-N8010 using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the advice.
I think i would fall for aosp one day if it supports just s note and paper artist, which my lil sis likes a lot.
later

@irish-sid
Actually this wasn't a question. This was a bug.
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda app-developers app

Ubuntu for Android Custom ROM for Galaxy Nexus

*****Moderators: please move this over to a different Galaxy Nexus ROM dev area should it apply, but please leave a link to it under this Sub-forum.
I have created what is probably the first custom Android ROM that includes the files for Ubuntu internally, alongside the existing Android architecture. While this is not really a polished release, it has the ability to crash the phone, and requires some tweaking by devs and downloaders. However, for Galaxy Nexus owners (toro for now, soon to be other GNex devices also) this ROM (Rev 2) should boot up after removing one internal zip file. Go ahead to https://sites.google...site/andrevroot for the link about the project, and/or the bottom of this post for
Some things to note:
Comment back what you think about this project, and ROM.
Please keep all comments polite and on topic.
Donate, via bitcoin if you like, as it helps support us, and help create better, more advanced ROMs.
Please look through the whole site
Don't try this ROM if you are new to custom ROMs, try Cyanogenmod ROMs first so you know what you are doing.
I take no responsibility for screwing up your device in any way.
This version is heavily based upon CM10, to the point where it should even say the General CM10 stuff under Settings>About Device. Please do not beat me up over this, it is just because I wanted to get a simple pre-release out there.
This is licensed, please read the License agreement at the footer of my site, you are bound to its terms. Its Creative Commons, but still used.
Thank You for your time, have a nice day.
Above all, do not try to update the CM firmware, as you will lose the ubuntu files contained within!!!!!!
-Andrevroot
***Links to follow***

I think the link is broke.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Me think so 2
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app

Link is broken...
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app

i hope this works tho

Alpha_wolf said:
i hope this works tho
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You got that right. The idea of running Ubuntu on my phone is pretty exciting.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

elidog1 said:
You got that right. The idea of running Ubuntu on my phone is pretty exciting.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ya i know me to lol i got excited and than found out the release thy put out was a preveiw i was a very mad portagee

**** tease
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Holy cow, dude this was awesome. I mean... me and this thing clicked instantly. As soon as it booted within 5-10 seconds I got through the lockscreen and then just started dozing through all the apps and swiping. It is a bit slow, not in particular though, probably as slow as Miui. This is just a dev preview, imagine the real thing and I didn't lose to much battery life within the span of 20 minutes. I wanted to keep this on my phone just to test but I couldn't. I'm just waiting for the real thing :victory:

Where's the link??
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

Trollolol

Esteway.619 said:
Where's the link??
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here's the link to his site which has download links to his Revisions 1 and 2. I've downloaded both and haven't had any luck getting them to flash and his website isn't very clear with instructions on how you're supposed to do so.
EDIT: It seems that he updated the link as I was typing my post. The link to revision 2 is no longer there, and the first revision is hosted on a different site. I'm going to download it and flash it and see if I have any luck.
EDIT2: No dice Jim Rice

withbloodskies said:
Holy cow, dude this was awesome. I mean... me and this thing clicked instantly. As soon as it booted within 5-10 seconds I got through the lockscreen and then just started dozing through all the apps and swiping. It is a bit slow, not in particular though, probably as slow as Miui. This is just a dev preview, imagine the real thing and I didn't lose to much battery life within the span of 20 minutes. I wanted to keep this on my phone just to test but I couldn't. I'm just waiting for the real thing :victory:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So you tried out the ROM, how well did it work for you? Did you like it, what do you want to see changed? I am trying right now to put together a hacked SlimBean version, which is much faster and better to use. Did the Ubuntu side work?
-Andrevroot

russphil said:
Here's the link to his site which has download links to his Revisions 1 and 2. I've downloaded both and haven't had any luck getting them to flash and his website isn't very clear with instructions on how you're supposed to do so.
EDIT: It seems that he updated the link as I was typing my post. The link to revision 2 is no longer there, and the first revision is hosted on a different site. I'm going to download it and flash it and see if I have any luck.
EDIT2: No dice Jim Rice
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll post a SlimBean version soon, which is better and faster. Should work.
-Andrevroot

Does anyone have a working link?
Edit: found it

Can u post a what's working and not working in the op so no one will ask latter. Thanks.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

ROM's

Since there is not a lot if them going about which one is least buggy for a trial run or is the coloros 2.0 ok to use
Sent from my X9006 using Xparent Green Tapatalk 2

Gummy would probably be the most stable you will find so far.

Not a lot? There's 5 if you include the 2 OSs from OPPO. But yeah running Gummy and no problems, haven't had the restarts some people are posting. Gps worked great for me, the newest nightly fixed my lack of auto brightness and screen rotation. It is slightly sluggish for the first minute or so after boot but fine after that. Pick one and enjoy the experiment and let us know how it works for you
Tapped out on my beastly OPPO Find 7a
I also had no major problems with COS 2.0b either so what do I know. I just dont like a heavily themed/overlay Android OS.

Color OS is good as is Gummy as they said. But just make a Nandroid backup with TWRP or CWM and you can easily go back if you don't like what you've flashed.
Sent from my Find7a using XDA Premium 4 mobile app

Pick_A_Name said:
Color OS is good as is Gummy as they said. But just make a Nandroid backup with TWRP or CWM and you can easily go back if you don't like what you've flashed.
Sent from my Find7a using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
tried to get cwm but rom manager didn't recognise my 7a
Sent from my X9006 using Xparent Green Tapatalk 2

tonybhoy said:
tried to get cwm but rom manager didn't recognise my 7a
Sent from my X9006 using Xparent Green Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You shouldn't be using ROM Manager, it's notorious for bricking/screwing up devices.

Entropy512 said:
You shouldn't be using ROM Manager, it's notorious for bricking/screwing up devices.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ive never had a problem with it on any phone

tonybhoy said:
ive never had a problem with it on any phone
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's been a source of issues on every device I've ever owned.
Koush is notorious for not doing anything to improve his stuff as long as the money keeps rolling in. The infamous "wipe three times" myth originates from him ignoring bugreports of CWM failing to reliably wipe on an older device for months. During the Samsung Galaxy S2 "Superbrick" fiasco, he was the first person to release dangerous recoveries and the last one to release "safe" ones - ignoring reports of CWM Touch bricking devices so badly that not even JTAG could bring them back for MONTHS. I had to argue with him for 30 minutes to turn on EMMC wipe suppression and rerelease recoveries after it had been integrated into CM's own local builds for 2-3 months. During most of that argument, he consistently blamed users for the failure and absolved himself of any responsibility.
Now the typical "your warranty is void, we are not responsible for any issues" claim issued by many custom firmware projects including CM is there to handle transient ****ups. Sometimes you miss something and it doesn't become obvious there's a problem until hundreds or thousands of people start flashing a release. But for Koush, he belives it is consistently his right to ignore bug reports for extended lengths of time, even when those reports are of hardbricks.

Entropy512 said:
It's been a source of issues on every device I've ever owned.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
maybe ive been lucky,using it since nexus one

Whitch one is most stable?

septim said:
Whitch one is most stable?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which one what? Recovery or ROM? As entropy suggests TWRP is the best recovery and as I and others have stated right above gummy is probably the most stable ROM.
Sent from my X9006 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app