UK judge rules that 3 Apple patents are invalid in lawsuit against Android! - Samsung Galaxy Nexus

http://www.todaysiphone.com/2012/07/judge-says-htc-phones-dont-violate-apple-patents/
HTC’s devices don’t infringe four Apple patents for the technology and three of those patents are invalid, Judge Christopher Floyd said today. In addition to the slide-to-unlock feature, today’s ruling covered Apple’s patents on tools used to scroll through photographs and change alpabets, and software allowing users to touch the screen in two spots simultaneously. While the court ruled that Apple’s photo-management patent is valid, Floyd found that HTC didn’t infringe it.“
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Suck on that Apple! (and that's coming from an iPhone 4s user)
Hopefully this sets a precedent for future lawsuits against Android (and competition in general) to be thrown out. Judge Koh are you listening?

ap3604 said:
http://www.todaysiphone.com/2012/07/judge-says-htc-phones-dont-violate-apple-patents/
Suck on that Apple! (and that's coming from an iPhone 4s user)
Hopefully this sets a precedent for future lawsuits against Android (and competition in general) to be thrown out. Judge Koh are you listening?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unfortunately, denying that something is infringing won't set a precedent (it will only have bearing for that particular device, patent, and situation/implementation), but affirming that it does will.

LOL Christopher Floyd, the crazy doc from Back to the Future.

phatmanxxl said:
LOL Christopher Floyd, the crazy doc from Back to the Future.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You mean Christopher Lloyd?

adrynalyne said:
You mean Christopher Lloyd?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bahahahaha I thought the same thing

Yeah... precedent in the UK perhaps... not anywhere else. I don't believe you can use cases in other countries in patent cases in a different country (correct me if I am wrong).

anton2009 said:
Yeah... precedent in the UK perhaps... not anywhere else. I don't believe you can use cases in other countries in patent cases in a different country (correct me if I am wrong).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not sure. Prior art refers to foreign patents I believe, so I don't see why not.

phatmanxxl said:
LOL Christopher Floyd, the crazy doc from Back to the Future.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Would of been better is it was the permanently pissed Keith Floyd tbh. Would of loved to be in THAT court room
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app

Now someone send this article to Judge Kohl in the galaxy nexus case. Maybe she'll learn a thing or two from it.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus

1.21 Gigapatents great Scott!
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

To apple my dearest friends i will spell this out for you eff you see kay. You. Have a nice day.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

Apple. The only company retarded enough to not realize competition is good. It drives us to perform better.
Sincerely, Effyou Seekay You.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Theshawty said:
Apple. The only company retarded enough to not realize competition is good. It drives us to perform better.
Sincerely, Effyou Seekay You.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Apple realized morons will buy the same phone over and over again if you change a number and letter in the name. That's smart.
Not too dumb to realize competition drives innovation. Just afraid of competition.
Just too dumb to innovate on their own.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

Related

Face Unlock might have been removed in the future?

Just read this:
http://www.patentlyapple.com/patent...sence-detection-security-for-ios-devices.html
Fruit Company applied the patent last August 2010, long before ICS was released.
What would happen if this patent granted?
Note that prior art won't save Google, because the change to first to patent :
http://www.iplawalert.com/2011/09/a...-introduces-firsttofile-to-the-united-states/
F*ck, I hate this patent thing especially done by this Fruit Company!
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
No, Google would have to be copying it exactly the way Apple does it. Apple is talking about 3D stuff.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App
Chill. Just chill. Its not as serious as you think.
It would be completely ridiculous if the fruit company were awarded that patent since patents are only supposed to be awarded for the non-obvious. This kind of implementation has long been obvious since bio-metric technology has been around for over a decade. This is just one spin / flavor of that.
Patent and copyright law is killing the US... just plain stupid.
face unlock is b.s. anyway. i tried it out and found there were times when it couldn't even register my face & had me enter in the password... that and yeah, it does seem to have difficulty telling if it's actually you in front of the phone or a picture of you.
voxigenboy said:
face unlock is b.s. anyway. i tried it out and found there were times when it couldn't even register my face & had me enter in the password... that and yeah, it does seem to have difficulty telling if it's actually you in front of the phone or a picture of you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Obviously you are doing something wrong since it works perfect every time I've used it to show off.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App
lol ^
I love face unlock, but it clearly needs more refinement. I hope Google brings that soon, I'm already pretty anxious for the 4.0.3 update.
"Face Unlock might have been removed in the future?"
What?
sn0warmy said:
"Face Unlock might have been removed in the future?"
What?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Has anyone seen John Connor?
Looks fine
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi...
The man who created it was the one who ran PittPatt and whom Google bought. The patent was approved in 2008 and filed in 2004.
Face unlock works great for me. Just take different captures in different lighting. Unless its pitch black I haven't had it fail, wearing a hat, hoodie, or glasses.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
Resun said:
Face unlock works great for me. Just take different captures in different lighting. Unless its pitch black I haven't had it fail, wearing a hat, hoodie, or glasses.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
same as that..
I setup face unlock from my waistline so I don't have to unlock my phone like a dingbat every time.
Sent from my Google phone
Face Unlock is a pretty old thing. There was computer software doing this already many years befor we had Android or iOS Devices. It's just another weird patent of Apple.
Even the way in the Apple patent to take the ratio of eyes, nose and mouth doesn't look new to me. I mean every crappy Webcam Software is doing this to recognize the parts of the face and do those weird big nose, big eyes, alien head and such effects.
skynet11 said:
Has anyone seen John Connor?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha! When I read the thread title I instantly thought of back to the future as well.

XDA is in danger. ;)

http://gizmodo.com/5898585/itll-soon-be-illegal-to-troll-in-arizona
Maybe not directly related to the phone, but certainly the forum itself.
No more trolls XD
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sadly, that only means 2% less trolling here. At best.
Sent from my calculator watch.
Wow... That is a waste of the great Arizona judicial system...
Hope its a late april fools joke. I can understand above and beyond harassment over the internet ( stalking,vulgar verbal abuse,threats,ect,ect)
But a class a misdemeanor!?! Lol any good attorney could have that dropped in a millisecond.... two words
Plausible deniability
just because they can track you down with a ip address doesn't mean it was you who was breaking their new trolling law...
Im no law student and didnt take the bar exam... But ive been in trouble in my younger years and know it will take alot of evidence,time, and money to convict someone for a misdemeanor (class a the highest class before a felony)
Over just "trolling"
Got AOKP?
You know I hate trolling just as much as the next guy but **** man! This is just one more right this sorry government is taking away from us! Every since 9/11 this country has turned to **** and they think they can do what ever the hell they want now! Every single right we have/had is slowly being takin away 1 by 1. I wish the world would blow itself up and kill off 75% of the population! Regardless if a troll is talking **** or going off topic, does not mean that right should be takin away!!!
F.T.W.
Welcome to 1984, even though the book was off by about 50 years with the date.
Yep, I'm moving to Nebraska or something.
This is true. I just read the bill at az.gov. Nearly unanimous support by both republicans and democrats.
Arizona is one of the ****tiest states, and people of Arizona are mostly retarded.
nabbed said:
This is true. I just read the bill at az.gov. Nearly unanimous support by both republicans and democrats.
Arizona is one of the ****tiest states, and people of Arizona are mostly retarded.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You better watch that language, you'll get a class A misdemeanor bud.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk
mattykinsx said:
You better watch that language, you'll get a class A misdemeanor bud.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, luckily I'm not in that joke a state. Here, we still have the first amendment.
Like many other controversial bills it will face an injunction until it is either stricken down or upheld.
garwynn said:
Like many other controversial bills it will face an injunction until it is either stricken down or upheld.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are right, ACLU will probably sue and win.
Let me troll this thread before it's illegal in my state...
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2 Beta-5
nabbed said:
You are right, ACLU will probably sue and win.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah just like they won against having to be strip searched even if you're arrested for petty crimes like not paying parking tickets....
Oh wait
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk
You know what AZ fu©k you and that sh!t brown horse you rode in on. You know falling from such a high place can be fatal, you fu©king numbskulls. What a waste of time and money, glad I don't live in Communist China I mean Arizona its expensive to move
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Epix4G said:
Let me troll this thread before it's illegal in my state...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
im ready to move now all i do is speak my mind on twitter/facebook etc in ways others are afraid to ... i'll probably be the 1st to go lmfaoo
This is the reason why after growing up in AZ for 26yrs I removed myself and family 10yrs ago from that dumbass state!! I feel for the rest of my family still there.
So...I guess TeamTroll will end up getting the chair then, huh?

End of Android?

Is this the end of android because of the evil enterprise named "APPLE"?
Read this: http://rootzwiki.com/news/_/articles/apples-latest-patents-could-spell-doom-for-android-r977
Seriously Steve Jobs and his peeps disappointed me.
Thanks to the original thread!!!
What's your reaction to this?
I don't think Google will give up easily. But if they do, then my next phone will be
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my bowl of jelly!
vbhtt said:
I don't think Google will give up easily. But if they do, then my next phone will be
Sent from my bowl of jelly!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would use this masterpiece rather than wasting my money on that stupid iPhone ****. Or better I would buy a brick instead.
=(
Apple is simply too expensive. Even if I sell my galaxy nexus and old wildfire s, I still couldn't afford iPhone 4S. I would rather buy new PC and for that price very good PC!
Sent from... you tell me
Don't worry, Google will be smart.
- In the next Android version they'll "re-invent" multi-touch and the other stuff.
- They'll probably also buy out a company just for their patents again.
- They'll probably just bite apple on the ass with patents against iOS if they ever come up in court.
Long live Android
yeah
---------- Post added at 08:27 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:26 PM ----------
benjamingwynn said:
Don't worry, Google will be smart.
- In the next Android version they'll "re-invent" multi-touch and the other stuff.
- They'll probably also buy out a company just for their patents again.
- They'll probably just bite apple on the ass with patents against iOS if they ever come up in court.
Long live Android
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
long live android
Android is much better than iOS.

			
				
vbhtt said:
I don't think Google will give up easily. But if they do, then my next phone will be
Sent from my bowl of jelly!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That was my phone
Sent from MARVEL
I have iPhone and HTC with android. From my experience Android is unbeatable. No doubt.
Sent from my Desire HD using Tapatalk 2
Apple are patent trolls and will do anything to stop Android because they know that it's dominating the market. It's for this reason that from ICS and up the lockscreen is a ring and not slide to unlock - Apple had patented the slide to unlock mechanism. I wouldn't worry too much, all Apple are doing is forcing Google to be more innovative and come up with new designs etc. to counter the Apple patents. Apple are taking the cowards way out.
If they do that, they declare war to millions of people and they will damage their reputation as a leader. Leaders shouldn't act like a 5 year old and say: their my cookies even tough you're eating them, my mommie baked them!
anarche_diver said:
If they do that, they declare war to millions of people and they will damage their reputation as a leader. Leaders shouldn't act like a 5 year old and say: their my cookies even tough you're eating them, my mommie baked them!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree, but Apple is very familiar with this kind of action. They are just like kids who must be "the first and the best", no matter what cost...
Sent from my Desire HD using Tapatalk 2
Apple Smapple
----------
Don't say thanks, hit thanks!
With these patents, they can also forbid all the museum stuff (touchscreen are really fashionable ), the cash machines, Windows Surface, all the modern devices...
It's alright, soon Apple will suffer and DIE in vain. And we will laugh at its grave.
Multitouch is nearly an industry standard. If Motorola can't implement their patents, then neither can Apple. If Motorola (owned by Google, btw) had their way, they would DESTROY all their competition, not just Apple, or even smartphone makers. They have patents for EVERYTHING, even fundamental radio technology that's currently in every phone produced post-2000. But no judge in their right mind would let them implement their patents and no judge will let Apple do the same.
johnnyspritz said:
multitouch is nearly an industry standard. If motorola can't implement their patents, then neither can apple. If motorola (owned by google, btw) had their way, they would destroy all their competition, not just apple, or even smartphone makers. They have patents for everything, even fundamental radio technology that's currently in every phone produced post-2000. But no judge in their right mind would let them implement their patents and no judge will let apple do the same.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
amen!!!! Well said!!!!

So apparently our phone is a copycat product...

Apple’s Lawyers: Samsung’s Galaxy Nexus is a Copycat Product
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Give it a rest Apple.
I'm so sick of lawsuits in general, I don't care between who.
In what ways it is a copycat?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
People,have a look at this:
http://www.theverge.com/2012/8/20/3256590/samsung-galaxy-nexus-minuscule-sales-apple
Oh yea sure, the 4.65" AMOLED screen, contour display, no hardware keys on the front, asymmetrical width of the phone really remind me of the iPhone.
According to Apple you're infringing if you have a thing that does stuff.
Breathing? Forget about it, you're 27 years behind on your licensing payments already.
“I often wake up in a panic thinking I have an iPhone. Then the sleep clears from my eyes and I realize it's a Galaxy Nexus. They just look so similar that it's hard to know."
crixley said:
“I often wake up in a panic thinking I have an iPhone. Then the sleep clears from my eyes and I realize it's a Galaxy Nexus. They just look so similar that it's hard to know."
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol. Love it!
I'd love to shake the hand of the person who bought a galaxy nexus thinking it was an iPhone.
And stealing sales? That's called competition, Apple!
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
crixley said:
“I often wake up in a panic thinking I have an iPhone. Then the sleep clears from my eyes and I realize it's a Galaxy Nexus. They just look so similar that it's hard to know."
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hahaha great
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus
What I find funny is the trial date, March 2014, so what's the point in a trial to ban a part that most likely won't be on the market as a new device offering which would mean sales if any would be nearly non existence. Seriously they'd have to sue for the next two models just to make 2014 a relevant model or even year.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2
I Am Marino said:
Give it a rest Apple.
I'm so sick of lawsuits in general, I don't care between who.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hush now...I may sue you. Lmao
But I agree. All of this is getting really old.
sent from my Galaxy Nexus while eating bacon
tomh1979 said:
What I find funny is the trial date, March 2014, so what's the point in a trial to ban a part that most likely won't be on the market
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Depends if you get a preliminary injunction or not, which, as you can see from the trial date, would be pretty damaging.
Also, half of these lawsuits are just publicity stunts. By calling the Galaxy Nexus a "copycat product", millions of idiots who haven't even looked one up just read about it and automatically assume that it is.
Because Samsung CUT on potential Apple profit and PASTED it to their bank account..
yeah, copycat..
CMNein said:
According to Apple you're infringing if you have a thing that does stuff.
Breathing? Forget about it, you're 27 years behind on your licensing payments already.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
how did you know my age? if that's your age, you're infringing on my patent and i'm calling a lawyer!
I'm surprised Apple hasn't sued every mobile phone manufacturer out there. I mean how dare all of those other devices make phone calls and send text messages? That was Apple's invention first you know.
tomh1979 said:
What I find funny is the trial date, March 2014, so what's the point in a trial to ban a part that most likely won't be on the market as a new device offering which would mean sales if any would be nearly non existence. Seriously they'd have to sue for the next two models just to make 2014 a relevant model or even year.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly, by that time the GN will be practically forgotten or 99.95$
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Samsung should show the percentage of returns and defects of the GNEX. Then Apple would need to pay Samsung money for the negative dollar amount it achieved.
[email protected] said:
Samsung should show the percentage of returns and defects of the GNEX. Then Apple would need to pay Samsung money for the negative dollar amount it achieved.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What defects?
miketoasty said:
What defects?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The LTE version has been a nightmare of this device. Luckily the 3rd one I received works. I consider myself lucky!
The 4G radio's in the phone do not work correctly in a large number of devices. I can only imagine how many users of this phone who do not visit sites like this are dealing with a GNEX that the 4G radio's craps out on and needs reboting to bring it back or the ones who can't even hold a 4G signal.
Let's not even touch the screen quality....

Apple's new A6 chip - incredibly fast with battery life to spare!

Hahahhaa, this is funny!
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?...161082.1072743519&type=1&theater&notif_t=like
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
http://9to5mac.com/2012/09/15/apple...s-samsung-built-processor-1gb-of-1066mhz-ram/
I'd love to shove in the faces of all the Apple fantards who are so proud that Apple "came up" with this chip!
Epic.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
According to anandtech the A6 is a custom design by apple like Krait is by Qualcomm. Samsung is only the manufacturer not the designer of the chip
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Don't they design their chips and have Samsung manufacture them?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Nice! Samsung should set the chips to self destruct when retardation is detected! :laugh:
Apple does design it. Samsung does the grunt work.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus
This is stupid. Apple design the thing and thought it up.. Samsung only manufactured it. In other words they where just hands to build the thing wow..
Neo3D said:
I'd love to shove in the faces of all the Apple fantards who are so proud that Apple "came up" with this chip!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
except they did design it. samsung has the manufacturing plants to make it quicker and cheaper than Apple ever could.
That baby beat out the SGS3 ._.
in benchmark >_>
.oO(Hm... thread has "Apple" in title... will be locked soon...)
iSaint said:
That baby beat out the SGS3 ._.
in benchmark >_>
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
they claim.. problem is that i never believe what they claim without any proof.
simms22 said:
they claim.. problem is that i never believe what they claim without any proof.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://www.anandtech.com/show/6298/analyzing-iphone5-geekbench-results
Do people in iPhone forums talk about the galaxy nexus?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Made by Samsung hehe
I'm sure we will see a form of it in the next galaxy s phone
-----------
iphones are the creation of people with nowhere left to turn
The gs3 beats out overall
Check this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U5G7Hnw5ceM&feature=youtube_gdata_player
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk 2
Nburnes said:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/6298/analyzing-iphone5-geekbench-results
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
again, notice what it says next to the iphone 5.. unconfirmed. those results mean nothing. they are just going by apples word, and you know that apples word means nothing.
italia0101 said:
The gs3 beats out overall
Check this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U5G7Hnw5ceM&feature=youtube_gdata_player
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The iPhone is a better UX. Having used both platforms, I can genuinely say I prefer iOS. Android has more features, and the openness and packability is nice, but Apple designs hardware better than any Android OEM, and iOS is perfectly nice out of the box on my iPad
Did anybody else notice apple claimed to have the thinnest phone in the world when in fact oppo has that title at 6.65mm?
need more high def music...
AshtonTS said:
The iPhone is a better UX. Having used both platforms, I can genuinely say I prefer iOS. Android has more features, and the openness and packability is nice, but Apple designs hardware better than any Android OEM, and iOS is perfectly nice out of the box on my iPad
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This thread has nothing to do with yours or anyone else's opinion on iOS. Or about android for that matter. Why can't apple have a nicely designed processor? We're starting to become quite the butthurt little group aren't we?
AmericanCon said:
This thread has nothing to do with yours or anyone else's opinion on iOS. Or about android for that matter. Why can't apple have a nicely designed processor? We're starting to become quite the butthurt little group aren't we?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not butthurt at all. Last I checked, this is a forum, meaning I am allowed to say what I think

Categories

Resources