it's a good news? lg6200 can flash lg spectrum (vs920) boot/recovery image ,because same hardware configuration,and into lg home success,sensor is ok , but has some problems: wifi is fail, telephone quality is bad, communication with hands-free each other can't hear voice, usb storage is invalid, these should be kernel driver problems. The above test information for your reference...
lg6200 already had ics engineer version.it means 3.0.8 kernel had.
only difference network(4G vs GSM/WCDMA/LTE).any good suggest?
http://bbs.fengbao.com/thread-955044-1-1.html
There looks to be a few hardware differences according to this.
http://www.mobilesmspk.net/compare/lg-optimus-lte-lu6200/lg-spectrum-vs920
It looks like they use different LTE bands and the 6200 supports HSDPA+ while the Spectrum does not.
Stonent said:
There looks to be a few hardware differences according to this.
http://www.mobilesmspk.net/compare/lg-optimus-lte-lu6200/lg-spectrum-vs920
It looks like they use different LTE bands and the 6200 supports HSDPA+ while the Spectrum does not.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Difference in 3G/4G band support doesn't really matter as far as ROMs are concerned.
I don't know if these two phones are the same, but I wouldn't base my conclusion on that site you linked to. Sites like that are useful for basic comparisons but often have some of the specific details wrong.
Related
What is the difference between the GSM GNEx and the CDMA GNex??
I know that the CDMA version is better, but in what way, other than the LTE support...
I mean, just because it has a different antenna, doesn't mean everything is different...
BTW I'm not a n00b, I'm asking because I'm nosy
familyguy59 said:
What is the difference between the GSM GNEx and the CDMA GNex??
I know that the CDMA version is better, but in what way, other than the LTE support...
I mean, just because it has a different antenna, doesn't mean everything is different...
BTW I'm not a n00b, I'm asking because I'm nosy
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not sure why you say the LTE version is "better". That's a purely subjective conclusion.
The differences are antennas (CDMA/LTE vs GSM/HSPA+), internal storage (32gb vs 16gb), and battery size (1850mAh vs 1750mAh).
Everything else is the same. The internals are reorganized a tad bit to fit the radios and battery in differently. But that's just cosmetic when the battery cover is off. CDMA version is slightly thicker also as a consequence of the internals.
Thx for the quick reply ^^ I was just wandering, because I got told it had 1.6 GHz o I was a bit curious... But again, thanks a ton!!!
familyguy59 said:
Thx for the quick reply ^^ I was just wandering, because I got told it had 1.6 GHz o I was a bit curious... But again, thanks a ton!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The processor, GPU, etc. Is all the same. You can find this info on any spec sheet site. For example www.phonearena.com
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App
does nitro HD have one?
never saw this but found a link
http://geekaphone.com/compare/LG-Nitro-HD-vs-Samsung-Galaxy-S-II-Skyrocket#music
I own bell optimus lte P930 (Canadian NitroHD)
leegoon84 said:
does nitro HD have one?
never saw this but found a link
http://geekaphone.com/compare/LG-Nitro-HD-vs-Samsung-Galaxy-S-II-Skyrocket#music
I own bell optimus lte P930 (Canadian NitroHD)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, it doesn't. That site is also wrong about FM radio (it doesn't have one) and gyroscope sensor (it does have one).
drumist said:
No, it doesn't. That site is also wrong about FM radio (it doesn't have one) and gyroscope sensor (it does have one).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That whole comparison is kinda strange. They really ding the Nitro for slower download and upload speeds, but both the Nitro and Skyrocket use the same Qualcomm SoC, which includes the cellular radio. They should be almost exactly the same if tested at the same time, on the same network, connected to the same tower. I think whatever testing was done wasn't exactly scientific. The battery life was a odd too, it looks like they took the time straight from LG (probably underestimated) and Samsung (probably overestimated) specifications directly. They also give the edge in display to the Skyrocket, even with its much lower resolution and PPI.
Anyways, on the original topic, the Nitro might have an FM transmitter. Someone asked about the P903s FM radio on Ricardo Cerqueira's Google+...
Hem Acharya - Thanks a lot. Just a quick query. By any chance is p930 going to have fm radio functionality discovered and enabled?
Ricardo Cerqueira - No idea, and it's not a priority...
FWIW, CM9 doesn't currently support FM at all, and even in CM7 we don't have FM support for the bcm4330 chip the p930 has.
https://plus.google.com/u/0/115049428938715274412/posts/LPcdTomdatt
They're probably talking about FM radio reception and not transmission but either way, even if the hardware is there, there doesn't like any software support coming in the near future.
Is there any way to make this tablet to support this kind of wifi -n?
I have a router TP-Link WDR4300 dual band, and the 2.4Ghz band is detected ok, but the 5ghz don´t show up.
The motorola Atrix, have support for 5Ghz..
tux_topo said:
Is there any way to make this tablet to support this kind of wifi -n?
I have a router TP-Link WDR4300 dual band, and the 2.4Ghz band is detected ok, but the 5ghz don´t show up.
The motorola Atrix, have support for 5Ghz..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The hardware doesn't support it, no real way to add it unless you change the WiFi module out for one that does, then you'll maybe need to build a kernel to support the new WiFi module.
Tapatalked from my HTC DNA - PAC
pio_masaki said:
The hardware doesn't support it, no real way to add it unless you change the WiFi module out for one that does, then you'll maybe need to build a kernel to support the new WiFi module.
Tapatalked from my HTC DNA - PAC
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
While searching, found this: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1675547
I know different devices, different hardware, and different OS... but are you sure that can´t be the same problem?
Of course, already search those files, but culdn´t find them....
Thanks for the answer!!
tux_topo said:
While searching, found this: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1675547
I know different devices, different hardware, and different OS... but are you sure that can´t be the same problem?
Thanks for the answer!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, that addresses an issue of a device having 5 GHz but losing its use after an update, the a100 never had 5 GHz support, period. The hardware just isn't there. The note is also a newer device, so 5 GHz support is more likely, the a100 is at least a couple years old now, when 5 GHz support was costly and not deemed required, now its cheaper and more cost effective to use existing chips supporting it vs having chips made without it.
And Acer is nothing if not corner cutting cost effective computer builders.
Tapatalked from my HTC DNA - PAC
From what ive read the Nitro and the spectrum are nearly the same, id like to know if ts possible to run nitro roms on the spectrum? cdma isnt important to me i use the gsm capabilities of the spectrum but unfortunately there isnt much development
I heard the partitions are different, so no, it would most likely result in a brick.
I have been searching for a teardown of DEB but cannot seem to find one. Does anyone know the differences in the hardware between FLO and DEB besides the obvious, one has a sim card and one doesnt.
Is the LTE capability integrated into the SoC on DEB but not FLO? If not, is the LTE chip located on the main board with the SoC or is it on the daughter board at the bottom of the tablet where the sim-card plugs in? Any help is appreciated.
skrypj said:
I have been searching for a teardown of DEB but cannot seem to find one. Does anyone know the differences in the hardware between FLO and DEB besides the obvious, one has a sim card and one doesnt.
Is the LTE capability integrated into the SoC on DEB but not FLO? If not, is the LTE chip located on the main board with the SoC or is it on the daughter board at the bottom of the tablet where the sim-card plugs in? Any help is appreciated.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's my understanding that Deb is relatively the same as Flo with the exception of data and full GPS capabilities. Many have flashed Flo ROM's on Deb devices and they will work but will not have data and full GPS capabilities, which defeats the purpose of having a Deb. An actual Deb teardown I have not done though.
Sent from my Nexus 7 Flo running CM 11 4.4.2 with ElementalX Kernel using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
I don't remember seeing it anywhere, but can I flash Deb roms on my flo? Theoretically, it should be fully functional (the flo, that is...), but I haven't had the guts to try as yet.
aarsyl said:
I don't remember seeing it anywhere, but can I flash Deb roms on my flo? Theoretically, it should be fully functional (the flo, that is...), but I haven't had the guts to try as yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm only stating what I've heard people doing. Trying is at your own risk.
Sent from my Nexus 7 Flo running CM 11 4.4.2 with ElementalX Kernel using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
I don't actually care to try...I was just curious. Curiosity isn't enough of a reason for me to run that risk.
I've flashed deb roms onto my flo in the course of doing testing: yes it will flash and boot fine.
I forget if it would work without bugs (testing mainly consisted of making sure it boots and nothing major is broken, like wifi, screen, or touch)
Obviously you wont magically get cellular support, it'll be like how it already is: the rom will simply see a radio that cannot connect/sense any type of network.
The biggest hardware difference is obviously the lack of the modem, it's an external module like on all S600 devices.
Software wise there isnt that much major differences:
They use the same bootloader
They use the same kernels
At launch they had the same basebands (flo's never gets updated though info on wiki)
The actual drivers and roms are not identical though, at the very least they're built in both 'deb' and 'flo' configurations, at the very least they have different names inside the drivers
skrypj said:
I have been searching for a teardown of DEB but cannot seem to find one. Does anyone know the differences in the hardware between FLO and DEB besides the obvious, one has a sim card and one doesnt.
Is the LTE capability integrated into the SoC on DEB but not FLO? If not, is the LTE chip located on the main board with the SoC or is it on the daughter board at the bottom of the tablet where the sim-card plugs in? Any help is appreciated.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My experience is that some ROMs will work between the "Deb" and "Flo" models but others won't. Some are even advertised as being bisexual. :silly:
It's entirely possible for the hardware on both models to be exactly the same, with some deeply rooted firmware switch to activate LTE. I'd think from a manufacturing and inventory management point of view, it'd be cheaper to build one version due to less tooling and inventory holding costs.
douger1957 said:
I'd think from a manufacturing and inventory management point of view, it'd be cheaper to build one version due to less tooling and inventory holding costs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Regardless of if the modem is in flo or not, there's no sim card tray on flos.
They could hypothetically use deb boards that otherwise work 100%, except somehow recieved a faulty modem chip,
but without a sim tray you wouldnt be able to do much with just that.
Many old tegra 2 based tablets had a PCI-E mini slot (PCI-E mini can do either PCI-E and/or usb, only the latter was actually available and that was what was used) where the modem went, you could likely solder in a slot on the wifi model and get the same modem elsewhere, but you'd need to also get a sim slot and tray to actually make it useful.