Develop Bugs

is dhd overclocked at 1.036ghz?

hi all,
i've just bought a new dhd so this is going to be a very noob question ^^'
i tried to search but in many posts i've found "overclocked to 1.036ghz" so i can't really understand if the dhd is overclocked at that frequency or if it is his "natural" max frequency.
i want to use setcpu to only set the smartass governor, so the question is: am i overclocking when setting the max frequency to 1.036ghz?
Thanks in advance.

Riekr said:
hi all,
i've just bought a new dhd so this is going to be a very noob question ^^'
i tried to search but in many posts i've found "overclocked to 1.036ghz" so i can't really understand if the dhd is overclocked at that frequency or if it is his "natural" max frequency.
i want to use setcpu to only set the smartass governor, so the question is: am i overclocking when setting the max frequency to 1.036ghz?
Thanks in advance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it´s a little bit oveclocked
u know that DHD works at 1ghz... +36 mhz its not a big thing... but its overclocked....
normally the processor by default works between 940-990 more or less...really its underclocked...again a little bit,,,

i don't understand fully, sorry
i'm using leedroid too.. how is it possible that there is no native frequency available? i can just only overclock or underclock a bit?
does it depend on the kernel i am using?
i don't want to overclock but i even don't want to _under_clock ^^'
thanks!

Riekr said:
i don't understand fully, sorry
i'm using leedroid too.. how is it possible that there is no native frequency available? i can just only overclock or underclock a bit?
does it depend on the kernel i am using?
i don't want to overclock but i even don't want to _under_clock ^^'
thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
use the leedroid parameters by default...
leedroid was selected this parameters sure because with this features DHD works better...(combined with his rom or recommended roms for his kernel of course)

errr overclocked a bit....I think the phrase you are looking for is "clock speed is just that"
the Scorpion Processor is billed as a 1ghz, cos 1.036 ghz processor sounds stupid.

What Dave said lol!
Sent from my LeeDROID empowered Desire HD using XDA Premium App

StuBlake13 said:
What Dave said lol!
Sent from my LeeDROID empowered Desire HD using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
without doubts the most helpful post in the thread...
not necessary...
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

In other news, My 2.0ltr engine is actually 1988cc

also your engine is a little bit underclocked?

I think it is, but i usually keep it at 1.2

wbbigdave said:
errr overclocked a bit....I think the phrase you are looking for is "clock speed is just that"
the Scorpion Processor is billed as a 1ghz, cos 1.036 ghz processor sounds stupid.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes this is what i supposed but i still see various answer types in this thread too
on leedroid rom thread they said that the nominal frequency is 1024mhz but leedroid kernel steps 12mhz above or ~30mhz below.
i think someone with setcpu and stock kernel should just check that in a second

Riekr said:
yes this is what i supposed but i still see various answer types in this thread too
on leedroid rom thread they said that the nominal frequency is 1024mhz but leedroid kernel steps 12mhz above or ~30mhz below.
i think someone with setcpu and stock kernel should just check that in a second
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
why is there a problem with these 12 mhz? 12 mhz is NOTHING.
usually i have my phone at 1.3 ghz and never happened anything

it's not a problem (i hope since oc may vary from piece to piece) i was just curious about those clock speeds

Riekr said:
it's not a problem (i hope since oc may vary from piece to piece) i was just curious about those clock speeds
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i think you have to ask lee for that, because he made the kernel you are using i think.

Quadrant Scores:

lets post scores and what we are running to get their to help compare the different options available now for our Droid Incredible 2's
1649 gingerbread (.3.) for another week or so

CM7 Nightly 2. Stock kernel, not overlocked:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

Cm7 overlocked to 1497
30 minutes or so later...and yes my crappy digital cameras clock is wrong

Cyanogen 1.8ghz

Underclocked and still better than stock. Runs great at 768mhz. No complaints.

Maximum overclock on stock CM7 kernel (~1.5ghz).

I did some tests with the CM7 Nightly 3. I got some amazing scores:
Stock cpu speed:
1.2GHz:
1.45GHz:
1.6GHz:
1.7 and 1.8GHz gave me lower scores than 1.6GHz, so I guess its safe to say 1.6Ghz is the max stable speed.

can't wait to hit cm7 and push it now !!!

Running miui at 1.49ghtz.
Sent from my Incredible 2 using XDA Premium App

Im running cm7 nightly 3 at 1.8 (and tested at 1.6) I am only around 2800 how are y'all getting up to 3500?
Sent from my Incredible 2 using XDA App

Interestingly, after some tweaking, messing around, and other stuff, I managed to score over 2200 at 768mhz. I'm getting some nice smooth performance out of it while underclocked, and getting it to do things quicker means it'll save that much more battery.

nimdae said:
Interestingly, after some tweaking, messing around, and other stuff, I managed to score over 2200 at 768mhz. I'm getting some nice smooth performance out of it while underclocked, and getting it to do things quicker means it'll save that much more battery.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What exactly did you tweak and mess around with? Cause that's sounds pretty nice.

melgibson666 said:
What exactly did you tweak and mess around with? Cause that's sounds pretty nice.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not really sure, to be honest. I was mostly tweaking personal preferences, then messing with governors on the CPU. While comparing governors, the number kept climbing until it broke 2200 then fell back to just under 2200. I double checked my CPU clock settings to make sure I was still at 768mhz. I haven't really done any further testing. I suspect part of it may be JIT optimizations, but I'm not sure.

nimdae said:
I'm not really sure, to be honest. I was mostly tweaking personal preferences, then messing with governors on the CPU. While comparing governors, the number kept climbing until it broke 2200 then fell back to just under 2200. I double checked my CPU clock settings to make sure I was still at 768mhz. I haven't really done any further testing. I suspect part of it may be JIT optimizations, but I'm not sure.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea I was messing around with the different govenors after reading your post and I noticed a big difference between the power saver and ONdemand. Power saver makes the transitions a little sluggish but I guess that's to be expected for what it's trying to do. lol All in all though the battery life on ondemand is leaps and bounds ahead of the stock ROM I'm running a 1.1ghz clock right now and it is like butter with battery life to boot.

Quad Standard
mine came in at 2924 thats awesome!

tragedy , mine is between 1250-1500

zozor said:
tragedy , mine is between 1250-1500
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What Rom
Sent from my Incredible 2 using XDA Premium App

zozor said:
tragedy , mine is between 1250-1500
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stock ROM? Mine wasn't even that low stock. Did you run it more than once?
Sent from my Incredible 2 using XDA App

am running this rom
[ROM] Offical Gingerbread 2.3.4 ROM is out via OTA by ChinaTelcom

zozor said:
am running this rom
[ROM] Offical Gingerbread 2.3.4 ROM is out via OTA by ChinaTelcom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Damn sorry bro I got a 2900 while on the phone lol
Sent from my Incredible 2 using XDA Premium App

***Official AnTuTu Benchmark Thread***

Post up your AnTuTu Benchmark scores! Please only post up screenshots for verification purposes.
Thanks to you zedomax! I am running just his kernel, without a custom ROM on top, and I love this thing. It is rock stable at 1.6GHz.
Correct me if I am wrong, but this sure looks like, at least for now, I am the highest score on AnTuTu with an E4GT. Am I right?

I just got a 7326 on Chris's latest exp. Kernel at 1.6 and i don't know how to take a screen shot lol.
Samsung Galaxy S II

pwnt
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Stock kernel FTW

^Holy crap! How did you get up to 1696Mhz?
viperROM (LoStKernel Exp) with 1.6Ghz OC & GPU OC.
Just imagine if we could get the 60fps cap off our phones

I guess that's what I get for trying, but I did say to limit this to E4GT only, so the SGS2 with the 7700+ doesn't count.
I will also state I ran mine exactly the same way I run it every day, with widgets running and such. SO I will go back and tweak what I can and see what I get. At the time, though, I thought it was cool.

ahl395 said:
^Holy crap! How did you get up to 1696Mhz?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stock kernel, tegrak app, stable
Sid 6.7 said:
I guess that's what I get for trying, but I did say to limit this to E4GT only, so the SGS2 with the 7700+ doesn't count.
I will also state I ran mine exactly the same way I run it every day, with widgets running and such. SO I will go back and tweak what I can and see what I get. At the time, though, I thought it was cool.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine is an E4GT.

R1ptide said:
Stock kernel, tegrak app, stable
Mine is an E4GT.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pardon me, I misread.
So how about some advice and pointers? Your RAM is one thing that is killing me, and if I were able to get 1650-1700MHz I figure the CPU figures will help themselves. My read/write is dead on with yours. So what do I do to get to those speeds and that much free RAM? I am running Tegrak as well. And other than the zedomax kernel and root, everything else is stock.

Sid 6.7 said:
Pardon me, I misread.
So how about some advice and pointers? Your RAM is one thing that is killing me, and if I were able to get 1650-1700MHz I figure the CPU figures will help themselves. My read/write is dead on with yours. So what do I do to get to those speeds and that much free RAM? I am running Tegrak as well. And other than the zedomax kernel and root, everything else is stock.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't trust any kernel that isn't based off of stock pulled at this point. I have social hub, media hub, and all the drm apps frozen. I think I have the odexed nociq mod but that might've gone away when I had to revert to a nandroid backup not sure. Don't use a live wallpaper.. That's about all I can think of really. Every phone is different so we could have the exact same setup and get different scores.

stangdriverdoug said:
I just got a 7326 on Chris's latest exp. Kernel at 1.6 and i don't know how to take a screen shot lol.
Samsung Galaxy S II
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you serious?
If you are press home and power at the same time
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium

I got this
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA App

This is the best I can do...
Samsung Galaxy S II

Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA App

Not to bad!
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium

trying to break 7800

How do ya get your ram so high? Does launchers slow the phones down? I'm running the lostkernel

lse4 said:
How do ya get your ram so high? Does launchers slow the phones down? I'm running the lostkernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I use the stock kernel and stock launcher so I don't know really

Jeez, I can't much higher than 5900 at 1600min/max mhz, performance gov, calk rom, lost kernal.. it looks like my CPU float-point and integer are crap compared to you guys

JoeBruin32 said:
Jeez, I can't much higher than 5900 at 1600min/max mhz, performance gov, calk rom, lost kernal.. it looks like my CPU float-point and integer are crap compared to you guys
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got the same setup... 1.6GHz max, performance gov, calkulin's rom, lost kernel 1.0.0.8. got similar score in 5900 range. then I flashed zedomax 6.02, same story... something in calkulin's rom isnt liking our overclocking.

try the pulled kernel and tegrak

R1ptide said:
try the pulled kernel and tegrak
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you recommending chris' stock pulled repacked with cwm, or his eg30plus?
edit: not even breaking 5400 on stock + tegrak @ 1.452

Quadrant Updated for ICS

I know this doesn't mean much but since people use it a lot, I figured I'd post it up. Post here with results for bragging rights etc etc even though it means nothing but just for fun
What's New
What's in this version:
2.0 changes:
Support for multicore CPUs and ICS
GUI improvements
Polish translation
Fixed slow framerate on PowerVR SGX 540
Due to changes implemented to support new devices this version of Quadrant reports scores different from 1.x releases. The result browser will be restored in the next update, when new benchmark results are
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://market.android.com/details?id=com.aurorasoftworks.quadrant.ui.standard
---------
I'll start,
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Franco 16.2 / Build 23

zephiK said:
I know this doesn't mean much but since people use it a lot, I figured I'd post it up. Post here with results for bragging rights etc etc even though it means nothing but just for fun
https://market.android.com/details?id=com.aurorasoftworks.quadrant.ui.standard
---------
I'll start,
Franco 16.2 / Build 23
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So are you overclocking and if you are, to what? This information would be pretty useful when looking at scores.

[email protected] said:
So are you overclocking and if you are, to what? This information would be pretty useful when looking at scores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
700 MHz min 1.35GHz max francoGazelle.

I overclocked to 1.35 with FrancoKernel and my ROM is Apex: I reach a score of 3085

AOKP milestone 3 ROM, Trinity kernel overclocked @ 1350MHz/512MHz (CPU/GPU) and undervolted @ 1225mV. Score was 3609, but can't post a pic yet because I don't have enough posts, so here's a link: (just take out the spaces)
i175. photobucket. com/albums/w142/alienetic13/Screenshot_2012-02-13-13-49-59.png
Sent from my GSM Galaxy Nexus / xda premium

Says its not compatible with my device? What the hell...
Running aokp m3 with Franco kernel... anyone elder get this from market?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

craigcgomez 4.0.4, Franco 16.2 turtle 1350/400
3346

Still get 3169 from older version on aokp with Franco kernel
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

If you guys want to up your scores a bit, try this:
- Create a backup (however you backup your phone, CWM, etc.)
- Using Root Explorer, go to: system/lib/egl and delete the whole first line in egl.cfg (that ends with the word 'android') so that only the line under it with your GPU name is still there.
- Reboot.
- Run Quadrant again. Should get better FPS and a bit higher of a score.
Sent from my GSM Galaxy Nexus / xda premium

Can someone post some stock, not overclocked scores please.

Stock 4.0.1, unrooted, not overclocked GSM Nexus: 2160
I can't post links, but the score breakdown was practically identical to the Galaxy Nexus score in the results chart, except my 3D score was about 1/4 higher than theirs.

Gummy 0.7.6, 4.0.4 radios, leankernel 1.10.0, oc 1350, interactiveX.

trojan89 said:
Stock 4.0.1, unrooted, not overclocked GSM Nexus: 2160
I can't post links, but the score breakdown was practically identical to the Galaxy Nexus score in the results chart, except my 3D score was about 1/4 higher than theirs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was hoping that wasn't true, lol.
I know these benchmarks don't really mean much but it is still nice to see a higher score.

I'm using Liquid Rom Beta 4 and Franco.kernel 16.2, and when using CPU benchmarks, including on Quadrant, Antutu and Linpack, for some reason, it's horribly slow and gets really bad scores. My Quadrant score was in the one thousands because the CPU score alone dragged it down. I'm gonna try Leankernel, then if that doesn't work, I'll switch back to AOKP. Does anyone else know anything else about this?

Cyanogenmod 9 with morfics 1382 trinity any ramdisk kernel
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

4.0.4 running franko's newest release 700min-1350max

AOKP M3 + franco 17.2 1,5GHz & UV:

Best Kernel for Performance

Alright so my seidio extended life battery is coming in tomorrow. and with that much junk in my trunk, I can reevaluate what I want out of a kernel. Scratch out the battery saving mods I'm looking for a beast, freak of nature, something that just makes the phone fly. Anyways any suggestion would be appreciated. Thanks

Try searching through the kernel threads
Jellin' like a felon

magicriggs said:
Alright so my seidio extended life battery is coming in tomorrow. and with that much junk in my trunk, I can reevaluate what I want out of a kernel. Scratch out the battery saving mods I'm looking for a beast, freak of nature, something that just makes the phone fly. Anyways any suggestion would be appreciated. Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
very easy, Trinity kernel.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

There s no one better kernel ,are all the same ,performance is generally associated with interactive ,pegasusq and ondemand governor
In last two day I've tested like 5 kernel ,this is my consideration and result
- battery : Franco kernel ( its 98 threadshot and sample rate make this better battery kernel ,with interactive smooth
-performance : FuguMod ,its is simple best performance kernel followed by all-in kernel like air kernel
Generally : now I'm using trinity its the best ,its colour mod is perfect I like this a lot
Test and choose this is the way
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

evelxe said:
There s no one better kernel ,are all the same ,performance is generally associated with interactive ,pegasusq and ondemand governor
In last two day I've tested like 5 kernel ,this is my consideration and result
- battery : Franco kernel ( its 98 threadshot and sample rate make this better battery kernel ,with interactive smooth
-performance : FuguMod ,its is simple best performance kernel followed by all-in kernel like air kernel
Generally : now I'm using trinity its the best ,its colour mod is perfect I like this a lot
Test and choose this is the way
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
when you say its color mod is perfect, is that after tweaking? or is it perect on stock settings? thanks!

simms22 said:
very easy, Trinity kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Settings?

I was flooded when I saw your benchmark results. I use Trinity Kernel, but no matter which one I use, my score never goes over 4000. Would you mind sharing which kernel you are using and some tips and tricks to get this type of performance. And just for kicks, how long does it take your phone to count to a billion?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app

He takes a trip to the Artic to bench on a iceberg and then flies back to upload the screenshot!
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

simms22 said:
very easy, Trinity kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because Quadrant means anything...
Sent from my AOSP Android 4.1.1 Galaxy Nexus