Develop Bugs

[Q] unroot lg nitro HD using superoneclick?

I plan to return my nitro tomorrow before my 14 days is up. It's rooted with superoneclick. Should I bother trying to unroot? Would hate to brick it without a recovery rom available.

It won't brick you phone, I've done it several times already.
In my personal experience the clerks don't bother check the condition of the software on the phone, they turn it on (or not) and that's it.
And besides, if it's bricked, well, there is always a wall charger to blame
P.S.
What are you getting instead?

My mind isn't completely made up yet. I want to love the nitro but the occasional lag, poor scrolling, and battery life is what's ruining it for me. RAM manager has made a difference in app switching. I've been watching you guys closely hoping for proof of an unlocked bootloader as I'm sure another rom or hardware accelerated browsing in ics will make all the difference.
If i ditch it, ill probably just go back to my iPhone 4 for a couple months and see if the at&t version of the nexus gets LTE. I love this display, but don't know if I want to commit to the phone for 2 years. Will let you know what I decide.

Thank [email protected] Unroot worked without any problems. I decided to return it and wait and see what you all can find in the next few weeks. I played with the skyrocket and nitro side by side in the store.. what a difference. The skyrocket is buttery smooth. I would jump on it in a heart beat if there weren't those huge pixels staring me in the face . The HTC Vivid actually felt like a decent compromise if compromises had to be made. Nice qHD display and pretty smooth. I still believe the Nitro has the potential to be the top dog, but not in it's current state.
Keep up the good work. I'd love to see new software on the fantastic hardware.

The display on this is fantastic. I can feel your pain as it's not as smooth as the Skyrocket. I'm not a huge fan of the super amoled - especially compared to this. I have switched to the Zeam launcher and it has made a pretty nice difference. I'm hoping there will be an interim release by LG/AT&T to speed things up and fix some of the other minor bugs.
And most importantly hoping the dev successes continue and we can get some nice custom ROMs going (especially ICS).

I said this in the unbrick thread as well, but really I must emphasize my phone is much smoother with the Korean rom I flashed. I think I feel confident proclaiming that when ICS or hopefully CyanogenMod come to the Nitro HD, this device will be astounding. It's kind of crappy that our current stock rom is so sluggish, but there is good stuff just around the corner I think.

Don't you get 30 days to return?

Malnilion said:
I said this in the unbrick thread as well, but really I must emphasize my phone is much smoother with the Korean rom I flashed. I think I feel confident proclaiming that when ICS or hopefully CyanogenMod come to the Nitro HD, this device will be astounding. It's kind of crappy that our current stock rom is so sluggish, but there is good stuff just around the corner I think.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what about bloatware? how much of it there? Maybe that's the reason it's smoother?

Kaiser_Beef said:
Don't you get 30 days to return?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, you have 30 days. Every Nitro owner who bought from Att should be able to return it since it came out this month.

[email protected],
I'd actually say there is at least as much, if not more bloatware. I really can't explain why, but navigating through menus and scrolling through apps just feels smoother. Now, I had never done a factory reset and reformatted my SD card until my fiasco, so it's possible that helped and that the Nitro rom might feel smoother when I get back to it.

Well, many people reported their phone feels smother after factory reset even if they didn't install anything prior that.

[email protected] said:
Well, many people reported their phone feels smother after factory reset even if they didn't install anything prior that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you kidding me, this phone is Soooo Much smoother after doing a hard reset, even with bloatware still on it. Even now the Atrix feel so much more sluggish compared to this phone. I dont understand wat people are complaining about this phone. Yes, there's many kinks on this phone that LG never took care of, but that's why we have XDA and the great minds in it, that is to improve the phones we have.
You know wat, Go ahead, go and change your phones to the GS II. And when the Nitro HD gets a significant improvement in the sense of ROMs or any other upgrades, all of you who left this phone behind can weep and regret your decisions

Compare an iPhone or skyrocket. There's a huge difference in smoothness vs the nitro.. especially with the web browser (even opera). Even rooted with ram manager and hard reset, it just doesn't compare. Saying there isn't a difference is like my friend's saying they don't see the big pixels in the s ii. Say what you want about iphones, but i think they have spoiled me in terms of user interaction.
All that said, I agree the phone has tremendous potential and will most likely outshine the s ii when all is said and done.. My guess is that some of the lag involves software rendering of the 1280x720. Scroll around and watch the nitro's CPU spike. Custom roms or ICS much resolve some of this which is why I'm going to wait it out a few more weeks or months too see what unfolds before committing to the device long term.

Slower then other SGS2 phones?!?

Hello all, I just got the SGS2 on T-Mobile. I have had the SGS1 Fascinate, Epic 4g, Epic 4G Touch, and now T-Mobile SGS2. I must say that for some reason the interface of this one feels to be the most glitchy (for lack of a better word).
Its not as smooth in various areas, and even seems to have a lower FPS. Its very odd and frustrating considering this is the same hardware as the last phone I had.
I used the SGS2 on Sprint since the phone came out and got a deal on this one.
Anyone else notice this? I hope there is a way to fix this.
I mainly notice this when using TouchWiz but also have noticed it just in the Settings menu. I am sure it has to do with the final carrier development of the Android releases. However that alone concerns me as we mostly base our roms on official releases. I surely hope there is a AOSP for this phone, looking forward to ICS.
If anyone has any suggestions on how to make this smooth please let me know. As expected I have tried many roms which are awesome roms, but most experience what I am referring.
Thx
DeeX

Different processors
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

Try a Skyrocket rom.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

I tried the skyrocket stock rom and yes indeed it runs much smoother. However the only tjing that keeps me from using it daily is the advanced toggles
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk

Well maybe different processors but same speeds. So its a rom thing or what? I hope ICS is smooth.. I ran ICS on the Sprint one and it was really nice.

The speed is not what makes one processor better than another. The other variants run smoother as they have the exynos processor which incorporates a better GPU allowing for smoother transitions, scrolling, etc...

DeeXii said:
Hello all, I just got the SGS2 on T-Mobile. I have had the SGS1 Fascinate, Epic 4g, Epic 4G Touch, and now T-Mobile SGS2. I must say that for some reason the interface of this one feels to be the most glitchy (for lack of a better word).
Its not as smooth in various areas, and even seems to have a lower FPS. Its very odd and frustrating considering this is the same hardware as the last phone I had.
I used the SGS2 on Sprint since the phone came out and got a deal on this one.
Anyone else notice this? I hope there is a way to fix this.
I mainly notice this when using TouchWiz but also have noticed it just in the Settings menu. I am sure it has to do with the final carrier development of the Android releases. However that alone concerns me as we mostly base our roms on official releases. I surely hope there is a AOSP for this phone, looking forward to ICS.
If anyone has any suggestions on how to make this smooth please let me know. As expected I have tried many roms which are awesome roms, but most experience what I am referring.
Thx
DeeX
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ROM - http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1455292
KERNEL - http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1372690
Flash these, problem fixed.

Unfortunately, this is not a software issue. It is a Cortex-A8 architecture vs. an A9. The CPU and GPU are worse on the T-Mobile/Telus versions of the S2. Nothing I have done has been able to make this phone as smooth as my international S2 :\ It's very annoying..

Is ICS really that good?

I don't know :/ Initially everything I read about it suggested that it used some form of hardware acceleration to make phones run much smoother. However, after seeing many speed tests between the Droid Razr and the Galaxy Nexus (both using TI OMAP4 chips, razr has GB and GN uses ICS) the Razr smokes the Nexus in every aspect. And I understand there are many other factors involved that could play into that, but in general it seems people's experiences with ICS point to it being much more bogged down then GB ever was. I don't know, anyone else have thoughts on this :/

Honestly I don't think it is that great. For me it is the eyecandy and a couple of cool new features that make ICS so interesting. But after running ICS for a while I went back to GB and was astonished by how good GB was. By no means is ICS bad, I just don't think that it is on GB level of performance.

It probably just depends on optimization and other stuffs. Processor doesn't determine everything, although it does help. I personally like the TW ICS and it's pretty smooth to me.

Ics gapps like youtube is one of the big big reasons why I stay and its just something different from gingerbread.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium

EpicFlair said:
Honestly I don't think it is that great. For me it is the eyecandy and a couple of cool new features that make ICS so interesting. But after running ICS for a while I went back to GB and was astonished by how good GB was. By no means is ICS bad, I just don't think that it is on GB level of performance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pretty much my experience as well. It seems they tried to make ICS very perty. And it is, it's got lots of nice transitions and neat features and a nice UI, but after going back to GB I realized how slow ICS actually is.
Perhaps that's why Google has already started Jelly bean, because they realized ICS isn't that great? :/

ICS on my phone is a minimum upgrade that works good for me but when my tab went from Honeycomb to ICS it made a much larger impact. I think ICS brings all the capable devices together and Jellybean will be the one that solidifies Android.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium

We all love something new, and we all love eyecandy.
If GB is working fine for you right now, you won't gain much at all moving to ICS.

The only thing I like about ICS is that elastic scrolling of a zoomed in page works.
Samsung GB is a mess. Doubletap on any content and scroll in 1 direction, it's all over the place with no elastic snap on either X or Y axis.

pbassjunk said:
The only thing I like about ICS is that elastic scrolling of a zoomed in page works.
Samsung GB is a mess. Doubletap on any content and scroll in 1 direction, it's all over the place with no elastic snap on either X or Y axis.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So out of all the new features, elastic scrolling is most important to you?

batting1000 said:
So out of all the new features, elastic scrolling is most important to you?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
[fwiw, I really dig MIUI. It's my go-to.]
I haven't experienced much in ICS (leaks) that has really improved much over what we already had. Gallery is better, but Gallery ICS+ is in the market for 2.3.
*shrug*

MultiLockOn said:
Pretty much my experience as well. It seems they tried to make ICS very perty. And it is, it's got lots of nice transitions and neat features and a nice UI, but after going back to GB I realized how slow ICS actually is.
Perhaps that's why Google has already started Jelly bean, because they realized ICS isn't that great? :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Google is on a yearly release schedule for major Android releases. Jelly Bean or whatever it'll be called was planned well before ICS was shown to the public.
And ICS on skinned devices isn't much of an upgrade, especially with the mess that is Touchwiz. This is due to the (correct) belief on Samsung's part that Android is more complicated and "ugly" than the average user wants/expects. Some of their feature enhancements are useful, but the visual is just awful. On its own, Touchwiz isn't worse than vanilla GB, but you can't use Touchwiz on its own. There are always elements of vanilla GB that show and that makes the entire thing an uncoordinated mess.
Android has reached a point where Google can work on refining the OS with small features. More importantly, ICS is the start of a unified and unique theme that can set Android visually apart from iOS and WP7 which look much better than any Android phone shipping with GB.
Of course, none of that matters since OEMs insist on skinning their phones. I had hoped Samsung would've followed HTC and toned down the skinning for the new version of Touchwiz, but that was a pipe dream considering the number of SGSII's they sold. My biggest problem with Touchwiz is that it doesn't mesh with the Holo theme at all which I hope app developers would use, allowing for a more unified Android look.
What I'm trying to say is: No, ICS is not that much of an upgrade from GB. But, ICS is that important to Android and its future.

pbassjunk said:
[fwiw, I really dig MIUI. It's my go-to.]
I haven't experienced much in ICS (leaks) that has really improved much over what we already had. Gallery is better, but Gallery ICS+ is in the market for 2.3.
*shrug*
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I actually love ICS especially the last few leaks. Everything seems so fast and efficient to me
Oh and my friend finally solved 4g on Miui so be on the lookout for that sometime in the near future
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Xparent Blue Tapatalk 2

JohnCorleone said:
Oh and my friend finally solved 4g on Miui so be on the lookout for that sometime in the near future
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
now THATS interesting news!
the one thing that's really kept me from playing with miui.
and, in general, i could not disagree with many of the responses here more. (and agree with JC)
ics runs smooth, quick, and the gapps are a Major upgrade, worth it alone, imho.

kingdazy said:
now THATS interesting news!
the one thing that's really kept me from playing with miui.
and, in general, i could not disagree with many of the responses here more. (and agree with JC)
ics runs smooth, quick, and the gapps are a Major upgrade, worth it alone, imho.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah Miui with 4g will be huge! He solved it on NS4G and is building a ROM now. After that (or maybe already) other Miui.us guys like TCP should have access to his code or changes to the code
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Xparent Blue Tapatalk 2

I had some serious battery issues, but I didn't tweak much and didn't want to. I wanted to see the experience Android/Samsung intended us to have.
My favorite aspect of ICS: the ability to disable built in apps. I don't use media hub. I don't use social hub. I don't use Sprint bloatware. ETC. I love having the option of disabling crap I don't use but being able to restore it if it causes OS problems.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA

in its stock form hell yea

TrayLunch said:
I had some serious battery issues, but I didn't tweak much and didn't want to. I wanted to see the experience Android/Samsung intended us to have.
My favorite aspect of ICS: the ability to disable built in apps. I don't use media hub. I don't use social hub. I don't use Sprint bloatware. ETC. I love having the option of disabling crap I don't use but being able to restore it if it causes OS problems.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How do you do that?
______
DT

Well, I had it switched from the touchwiz launcher to the stock launcher. I don't think that makes a difference though. Manage apps> all> select an app> if it's a stock app instead of the uninstall option, it'll have disable. Beats the greyed out block that's on GB.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA

Yes ics is awesomee it's still being worked on and im surprised how nice it is. But like others say if u like GB then stay on it. if u want to try ics do it if u don't like it go back no big deall
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA

Majin101 said:
Yes ics is awesomee it's still being worked on and im surprised how nice it is. But like others say if u like GB then stay on it. if u want to try ics do it if u don't like it go back no big deall
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Totally agree with you, and I did the latter because of the battery life and I'm waiting for them to polish out the bugs I found. The title of the thread is asking for peoples opinions and evaluations of ICS. You have to understand that some people are not going to share your point of view.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA

Project Butter - Is it obvious to the naked eye?

People that installed Jelly Bean, do you see any increase in perfomance?
Write your opinions.

Its not a performance gain. Its just as fast as before just not nearly as choppy. There is a video around here sums it up pretty well.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

I do feel like it's snappier, but it's hard to say how much of it is just placebo for hearing about how much snappier it is. There's still some lag every now and then when bringing up the app drawer and such, but there's also graphical improvements that I think make up for everything (the "notification center" or whatever it's called is great).

Although there is Lag in odd spots, I notice neater and smoother transition effects more then anything else. The Keyboard also dissappears when returning to the home screen immediatly rather then lurking on the home screen like it did in ICS. Nothing Major or Revolutionary, but generally neater.

I can tell a major difference after flashing jb.
in old rom chrome is not rendering smoothly when you flip through horizontal tabs comparing to vertical ones. now the problem is completely gone.

From the off, the rom seems noticeably faster and smoother to me.
1. The new app transitions are fantastic. They fade in and out, which is quite slick.
2. The keyboard has ZERO lag, I didn't think it had any lag when I was running AOKP, but running the new JB rom, it's a lot faster again!
3. Home screen/App drawer transitions are a lot snappier. It is now on par with the transitions of an iPhone 4s (Compared with my friends earlier) No lag in the app drawer, even with all of my many apps installed.
4. Last but not least, scrolling long lists is buttery smooth for me Everything just seems so slick at the moment.
On a side note, some subtle changes, like when choosing default action, or long pressing on home screen look a lot nicer. The lock screen looks way cooler. And of course google now seems to be working great. (Aside from having to tell it to use English US, because its not fully functional in the UK)
Hope this helps anyone who was maybe sitting on the fence, I have been running AOKP since getting my nexus, Think is was build 11 or 12 I first had. I am now running Jelly-Belly by Team Inferno and have not even though about returning to AOKP. I will gladly return to AOKP when they release a stable JB update (which will likely be in August some time (JB Source to be released in mid July))

+1 to earlier posts. I can confirm, the "flow" thanks to "Project Butter" is very much appearant to the naked eye. I doubt there is an Android device out there that has a smoother UI than the Galaxy Nexus and Nexus 7 with Jelly Bean right now. Love it.
EDIT: The smoothness of live wallpapers seems to have been greatly improved as well. A live wallpaper called "Fresh Leaves" lagged quite bad when using AOKP 4.0. Now, with Jelly Bean - no lag at all

sjrp said:
+1 to earlier posts. I can confirm, the "flow" thanks to "Project Butter" is very much appearant to the naked eye. I doubt there is an Android device out there that has a smoother UI than the Galaxy Nexus and Nexus 7 with Jelly Bean right now. Love it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed, I also think it is definitely closer, if not on par with that of the iPhone and Windows 7 phones.

Definitely solid 60 fps in more areas. My ics setup is probably 45-50fps solid. I noticed less quirky transitions in jelly bean but a few other odd quirks. Still it is overall smoother than ics. And could use a little more polish.
...

I agree with what everyone has said. Its noticeably a little quicker but it wasn't like ICS was horrible. One thing no one has mentioned is that the delay when pulling up your recent apps is gone. Its now pretty much instant which makes multitasking better. I think everyone should try jb. I've been running stock rooted jb since Wednesday night and couldn't be happier.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

There is LAG.
Whoever says there is no lag, do not see properly, or are fanboys willing to not see or ignore those quirks.
I'm a HUGE Google fan, and I've been disappointed. This is 2012, and I genuinely believed that Android is better in almost EVERY way than iOS. But I disagree now.
I watched the io live, so much chest thumping, project butter n stuff - got me very excited. After installing it on my nexus, and experiencing it - I concur with most of the statements mentioned here.
Now it disappoints me because THERE IS LAG and the way Google boasted about butter, and the hackery that has gone into it to make it "appear" smoother - while the odd lag and jerks still exists as before, is a bit of a dampener.
The phone is noticeably smoother, the jerks are still present - if you have an eye to look at it, and considering Android top smartphones pack 1.5 times the power of an iOS or Windows phone - backed by Google, can still not solve this basic UI fluid problem - is disappointing.
I would prefer less chest thumping, and more action in dealing with this problem but after doing some heavy net searching - I've found this issue relates to the core of android, and makes it an inferior user experience to iOS and even Win P7 which runs on inferior hardware too
search more on the subject and you would find, here's just one piece...
https://plus.google.com/100838276097451809262/posts/VDkV9XaJRGS

dhruvraj said:
Whoever says there is no lag, do not see properly, or are fanboys willing to not see or ignore those quirks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have better than 20/20 vision and am hardly a fanboi. It's a significant boost in performance over ICS. Can't wait to see the AOSP ROMS, they shall be killer.

So keep looking, and you shall find.

Considering this is a Developer PREVIEW, I'd have to say it's amazing. There is most definitely a difference in smoothness when compared to ICS. There is slight lag, but nothing that hasn't been seen on competing OS.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

dhruvraj said:
So keep looking, and you shall find.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I shall find that it's not a significant improvement over ICS?

CMNein said:
I shall find that it's not a significant improvement over ICS?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Find proof in what I said earlier which you nitpicked
Observe your phone carefully - and you would find the same thing as what I wrote.
Now for your question here - yes, you are right, it is a good enough improvement over ICS.
The animations are faster, switching to messages and coming back - is much faster. App drawer, open close is faster - the screen "feels" more sensitive - it works with feather touches - and almost feels like the system is eager to make you feel how smooth it is.
All that works. ICS was smooth too. Granted this one is smoother.
Lag and jerks existed in ICS too, and they do in Jelly Bean as well. They have resorted to other ways of making the phone experience to appear smoother while the problem with lag - scrolling through screens, app drawers, switching from app back to home drawer, and then scrolling - the MAJOR components of lag, still exists.
and irritate. If you're fine with it, cool. Good for you. I expected better of Google. Given WP7 and iOS do a phenomenal job with inferior hardware. Even the iOS part doesnt hurt as much as the WP7 does.
I mean come on! MS making this better than Google? There's some serious questions to be asked on our love for android here.

I don't pay attention to the animations since I typically disable them, and they can indeed be "hacked" to appear smoother. I've always felt that animations are just wasted time. I think that this preview is a sign of good things to come, but also some bad things to come, i.e. the new wifi drivers STILL suck.
I can see your point however. I think it's the trade off we have to make to have such great customization vs the Iphone.

dhruvraj said:
There is LAG.
Whoever says there is no lag, do not see properly, or are fanboys willing to not see or ignore those quirks.
I'm a HUGE Google fan, and I've been disappointed. This is 2012, and I genuinely believed that Android is better in almost EVERY way than iOS. But I disagree now.
I watched the io live, so much chest thumping, project butter n stuff - got me very excited. After installing it on my nexus, and experiencing it - I concur with most of the statements mentioned here.
Now it disappoints me because THERE IS LAG and the way Google boasted about butter, and the hackery that has gone into it to make it "appear" smoother - while the odd lag and jerks still exists as before, is a bit of a dampener.
The phone is noticeably smoother, the jerks are still present - if you have an eye to look at it, and considering Android top smartphones pack 1.5 times the power of an iOS or Windows phone - backed by Google, can still not solve this basic UI fluid problem - is disappointing.
I would prefer less chest thumping, and more action in dealing with this problem but after doing some heavy net searching - I've found this issue relates to the core of android, and makes it an inferior user experience to iOS and even Win P7 which runs on inferior hardware too
search more on the subject and you would find, here's just one piece...
https://plus.google.com/100838276097451809262/posts/VDkV9XaJRGS
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Finally someone had said what I have been thinking. Jellybean still lags a ton! How can Google talk about project butter so Mich while the rom still lags a crap ton?

Its a leaked developers version, its not ready for primetime and was never meant to be. Once AOSP is updated I'm sure it will be sorted. However, it is a promising start IMO. Seems smoother (NOT lagfree) then stock ICS

Everything's amazing and nobody is happy.
You want to see some lag, try a Vibrant on stock Froyo. This stuff does not bother me in the least. It didn't bother me in ICS. JB is awesome. JMO.

[Poll] How satisfied are you with your Nitro?

If you could rate it on a scale of 1 to 10, what would it be?
As of 8/5/12, 8:36 PM EST, the mean score is a 7.8 (round to an 8) and the median is a 9.

I chose 8 because there are several things I want that it lacks. Stable Jelly Bean, NFC, and better battery life.

Id give it a solid 9. Just got it 2 weeks ago and its a step up from mu previous phone ( Galaxy S Captivate). I just wish battery life was better
Sent from my LG-P930 using xda app-developers app

only problem is battery life and updates
battery life get an extended battery
updates wait or mod
overall I give it 8.5
Sent from my LG-P935 using Tapatalk 2

Hardware wise: 8/10. Great screen, relatively thin, nice camera. Build quality could be a bit nicer though, especially compared to phones like the One X.
Software wise: 2/10. Very late ICS update, almost zero chance of an official Jelly Bean update, unstable CM9 nightlies/RCs (random reboots, flickering, GPS not working, etc). CM10 preview still has major issues to be worked out. Bad battery life with all of the ROMs I've tried, including the latest V20C official ICS from LG. CM9 RC2 was promising initially but battery life is also not good on that ROM. UI "smoothness" is also really lacking, especially when compared side by side with a Galaxy Nexus running Jelly Bean. The Nexus's UI just flies compared to the laggy, sometimes flickering transitions on the Nitro HD.
Overall: 5/10.

HW: 8/10 I wish it had NFC lime the optimus.
SW:7/10. ICS was late, but its awesome. CM10 also is very stable for me, not like you guys with random reboots and stuff.
Sent from my LG-P930 using xda premium

root
The fact that its not as easy to root is the main reason i gave it a 5, also new update ****ed up my battery life bad

Glad to see you guys are satisfied with your Nitros. My vote was a 5, and here's why:
Hardware - Fantastic screen, but I'm not much of a screen guy. I actually like the Galaxy Nexus's screen more which I know makes no sense at all. Decent processor/graphics. Suspect build quality. Subpar camera. Poor reception. No NFC. Overall, 7/10.
Software - Gingerbread up until very recently. Hard to root. Poor developer support, and really just poor developers other than the CM team. Easy to brick. I haven't been able to try ICS for the phone but I'm going to give it the benefit of the doubt. Overall, 3/10 on Gingerbread, but I'll give it 5/10 for ICS.
That would give it a six, but I feel like five accurately expresses my feeling towards the phone more.

I love my phone. I'm on CM9 stable and I love this phone. I'd have to give the phone probably an 8 only gig on it being battery life .
Sent from my LG-P930 using xda app-developers app

9/10
I have been using my Nexus One ever since it came out and I bought it from Google online directly. A month ago I flashed CM9 on it and it still runs great!
However, accidentally found a very good deal for P936 so I've decided to give it a try since it's only USD3.00 different for upgrading to 4G plan from my current 3G plan that still have almost 2 years contract.
There are only 3 choices that support 4G on the market: LG-P936, HTC-OneXL, and Samsung GS2-LTE. Whether from the device outlook or the screen quality, P936 is far better than the others, the only disadvantage is OS version - GB... but with CM9, especially the stable release that released recently, I'm falling in love with my P936 more and more on a daily basis!
Hooray!
sent from my LG-936 using xda premium

I gave a 9 for me its a really great phone. Wouldnt need a better one.Didnt give a 10 cause i noticed a couple of bug like download failed and thats about it.Im stock 2.3.5.Really wondering too update to 4.0.4 im just afraid that it will be buggy or the performance will be worse.Can anyone say something about official ics? Is it smooth,do videos lag,do games lag, and is benchmarking and the browser good?

Performance and stability were great with the official ICS for me. I had a bug where the phone would never go to sleep so standby time was terrible. It looks like some other people have ran into that one as well, but not everyone. I'm back on CM9 for now, but I'll try the official version again in the future.

Gave it a 6 because hardware-wise, it's a 8/10, but software wise it's a 4/10. I had stock GB which was, well, GB. Then I took like 12 hours (at a stretch) to get it rooted. After that I installed a CM10 nightly only to face random reboots and an 8 hour battery standby time, alongwith abysmal network performance.
After that I installed HO-NO's latest Stock build. Everything is smooth, but the phone gets stuck for a few seconds and then goes into some sort of deep sleep. I need to do a battery pull every 2 hours.

It' a 9! A good phone. Good hardware (enough for me). Good software (after LG released latest v20c for it)...