Hey everyone. What type of values do you prefer to run on the DINC2 when it comes to clocks/volts? I've searched and read that this CPU is similar to the Thunderbolt, and people on the thunderbolt tend to overclock it anywhere between 1.4-2.0 GHz. Can I get some general statistics/info here? I'm looking for safe/typical statistics for the following:
1) Minimum clock speed (underclocking, for those who do not like to mess with voltage)
2) Maximum clock speed on STOCK voltage (overclocking without messing with voltage)
3) Minimum voltage on STOCK Speed (undervolting)
I plan on running either CM7Kang or SRZ1.3 and am wondering what I could do with it.
I normally run SRZ1.3 rom with overclock to 1.4GHz using SetCPU and undervolt to -50 on all values using IncrediControl.
Get the pretty close to the same battery life as stock and most of my apps load a bit faster.
It all depends on your phone man, each is a little different, I can only go to 1.4 something ghz before my phone locks up but I've heard of others going much higher, I wouldn't set my Max speed any lower than 768 because of lag. I would under volt all values by 50, then set the 245 MHz value to 725 mil volts and use the smart ass v2 gov so when the screen is off it uses that speed and sips battery...
Sent from my Incredible 2 using XDA App
I know phones are different, but I just wanted to know a generic thing. 1.4 GHz is your typical OC on stock voltage? Sounds about what the Thunderbolt guys said.
I've had my phone extremely stable at 1.8, but battery life sucked. Currently, I'm running cm7 with voltages -50, governor set to ondemand, min 384, max 1.4. I do get a little bit of lag coming from unlocking screen. So i would say 700mhz would be a good minimum.
sjpritch25 said:
I've had my phone extremely stable at 1.8, but battery life sucked. Currently, I'm running cm7 with voltages -50, governor set to ondemand, min 384, max 1.4. I do get a little bit of lag coming from unlocking screen. So i would say 700mhz would be a good minimum.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
700 min? I think that would drain battery like crazy...
Sent from my Incredible 2 using XDA App
Here's my setup. I'm running mikrunny with stock kernel, and stock voltages.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
And here's my battery level info.
tylerlawhon said:
Here's my setup. I'm running mikrunny with stock kernel, and stock voltages.
View attachment 864113
And here's my battery level info.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Run the same with -50mv
Sent from my ADR6350 using xda premium
I am running at 1.1ghz with -100 all. No reboots so far
Sent from my Incredible 2 using Tapatalk
kevdliu said:
I am running at 1.1ghz with -100 all. No reboots so far
Sent from my Incredible 2 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How good is your battery life with that setup?
klabit87 said:
How good is your battery life with that setup?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
60 percent after 7hr 30min. thats with 83 percent of the time no signal and one bar the rest.
Sent from my Incredible 2 using Tapatalk
Whic kernel are you on?
Sent from my ADR6350 using xda premium
faehsemc said:
Whic kernel are you on?
Sent from my ADR6350 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am running touchpro's ICS with aeroevan's v6 kernel here
if you decide to switch there is currently a market download bug with the combo. the solution is in the ICS discussion thread over at the general section.
kevdliu said:
I am running touchpro's ICS with aeroevan's v6 kernel here
if you decide to switch there is currently a market download bug with the combo. the solution is in the ICS discussion thread over at the general section.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
U wrote 1.1 I wasn't thinking GHz I was thinking mikrunny 1.1 and was like damn.. never could get past -75mv
Sent from my ADR6350 using xda premium
im trying the -50 undervolt on condemned as we speak. 245/1209
I always oc to 1.3ghz, I am currently using the smoothass governor on aeroevans v6 ics kernel. I undervolt -25 across the board for AOSP roms and -50 for Sense roms. Currently running Touchpros ICS beta 3 build, Last night before I plugged in my phone I was at 67% after 16 hrs 32min. My phone runs silky smooth, no lag and very fast.
dankblaze said:
I always oc to 1.3ghz, I am currently using the smoothass governor on aeroevans v6 ics kernel. I undervolt -25 across the board for AOSP roms and -50 for Sense roms. Currently running Touchpros ICS beta 3 build, Last night before I plugged in my phone I was at 67% after 16 hrs 32min. My phone runs silky smooth, no lag and very fast.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so is -50 bad on a aosp rom?
mighty_markus12 said:
so is -50 bad on a aosp rom?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No I'm -75 on liquid and its awesome
Sent from my Incredible 2 using XDA App
mighty_markus12 said:
so is -50 bad on a aosp rom?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
not necessarily bad but most of the time not needed due to less processes running all the time to suck battery like in a sense rom, it may work for people but it can lead to lagging and freezing when you undervolt too much.
Related
What your Undervolting settings guys ?
Me:
1350mhz:1225mv
1200mhz:1125mv
920mhz:960mv
700mhz:860mv
350mhz:760mv
230mhz(only on Leankernel):710mv
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App
Those look pretty aggressive, I'm going to try them out and see if they work for me. Thanks for the post
I'm using franco's
1200:1075mv
700:925mv
I wish I could go lower for the 700 but 900mv instantly freeze
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
I'm using the 1.4Ghz oc uv kernel.
Here is my undervolting setting.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Here's mine, your were slightly to aggressive for my phone, too about 5 reboots before I could change them lol
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App
The proof
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App
I'm not saying that your lying, every device can handle undervolting/over clocking differently for example on my desire HD I could keep it at 2Ghz all the time while most people couldn't go past 1.8
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App
Could someone comment on the real life battery life benefits to undervolting? Since most of the power consumption is the display, I'm wondering how 'worth it' it is. Thanks
Keeping heat down and extending life of phone. The uv helps more in that regard really than giving you more bang for your charge.
Sent from my Nexus in Texas.
kevinaminaator said:
Could someone comment on the real life battery life benefits to undervolting? Since most of the power consumption is the display, I'm wondering how 'worth it' it is. Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The real world batter life gain is very very close to none. I'd say that it isn't worth it, but let the kids play if they want to
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
io53 said:
The real world batter life gain is very very close to none. I'd say that it isn't worth it, but let the kids play if they want to
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 on this. I've yet to see any proof of that the small gain even can be measured.
Sent from my HTC Desire HD using XDA App
On my desire HD I could get about 30 minutes more out of it on my Gnex I gay about 15 minutes more
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App
I dont mind about the battery life(and seem to be very little change)
BUT the temperature rising while playing 3D game is much better than stock voltage.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App
@rbiter said:
Keeping heat down and extending life of phone. The uv helps more in that regard really than giving you more bang for your charge.
Sent from my Nexus in Texas.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Undervolting can lower the life of your device just as much as heat. Excessive anything is bad (except battery life).
I, too, stopped messing around with UV; just always caused weird instabilities or crashes.
Im using the default UV on imo's leankernel with interactiveX
Are the advantages/gains really that minimal? I mean thinking about it logically, it should help shouldn't it?
I was all set to lower mine even more but you guys have me thinking twice now lol...
heat is the most affected thing tho, and a phones life isn't a huge concern for me as i switch phones in July and january
cordell507 said:
heat is the most affected thing tho, and a phones life isn't a huge concern for me as i switch phones in July and january
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The number one heat sources for these devices are the radios. No amount of undervolting is going to change that.
This is what Ezekeel (GLaDOS kernel dev) typed at rootzwiki:
Regarding Custom Voltage, note that the CPU in the GN uses Smartreflex to automatically determine proper voltages for all CPU frequency states, so a manual UV should not be necessary (check the calibration with 'dmesg | grep sr_'). The voltage values set with Custom Voltage are the nominal voltages which are used as a starting point for the calibration. Forcing the nominal voltages below the calibrated voltages determined automatically by Smartreflex can have adverse effects. So be warned! The main purpose of Custom Voltage is as a companion for Live OC so users can raise the voltages to stabilize higher OC values.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://rootzwiki.com/topic/14685-kernel29-jan-glados-v16/page__view__findpost__p__428886
http://rootzwiki.com/topic/14685-kernel29-jan-glados-v16/page__st__200
I don't know about ya'll, but my phone only feels the heat when playing games or excessive hspa dl'ing. It is much harder to know you get more juice from uv'ing on a phone. Even laptop users usually say the gain is not worth mentioning.
Sent from my Nexus in Texas.
Greetings all!
I have modified Calkulin's Battery Saver Script to work with our GNex devices. I updated the undervolt init.d script to work on both CPUs and tweaked the voltages based off Apex's voltage table. If you are setting cpu setting on boot via control app (ie: Glados, Franco, performance settings) please disable since the conflicting scripts will cause issues. The default governor and other settings can be modified by manually changing values within the scripts.
Prerequisites:
A kernel with init.d support
-default CM9 kernel doesn't work (still looking for a fix)
Flashing Instructions:
1. Reboot into recovery and make Nandroid backup
2. Flash attached zip file just like you would a rom.
3. Reboot and enjoy.
REMOVED FOR STABILITY/COMPATIBILITY
Undervolt Steps are based on # of CPU frequencies available:
Code:
STEPS_10="1475 1375 1325 1275 1225 1175 1050 975 850"
STEPS_9="1425 1375 1325 1275 1225 1175 1050 975 850"
STEPS_8="1375 1325 1275 1225 1175 1050 975 850"
STEPS_7="1325 1275 1225 1175 1050 975 850"
STEPS_6="1275 1225 1175 1050 975 850"
STEPS_5="1225 1175 1050 975 850"
CPU profiles:
Code:
BATTERY_PROFILE_1: From 100% - 85% battery level
MAX_CPU_SPEED="1200000"
MIN_CPU_SPEED="0"
BATTERY_PROFILE_2: From 84% - 0% battery level
MAX_CPU_SPEED="1000000"
MIN_CPU_SPEED="0"
AWAKE_GOVERNOR_ON: Changes to this initially after screen turns on
AWAKE_GOVERNOR="interactive"
AWAKE_MAX_CPU_SPEED=max profile speed
AWAKE_MIN_CPU_SPEED=max profile speed
AWAKE_DURATION="5"
SLEEP_GOVERNOR_ON: Changes to this once screen turns off if no SCREENOFFMAX file is found
SLEEP_GOVERNOR="conservative"
SLEEP_MAX_CPU_SPEED="800000"
SLEEP_MIN_CPU_SPEED="0"
The script at work.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
CREDITS:
98% of the credit goes to Calkulin -
bigxie for posting the voltage table
ME
I'll most def be giving this a shot.
D
Sent from my Sprint Galaxy Nexus CDMA using xda premium
installing
so i just flash threw recovery right? if i make a nandroid back up will it remove it if it makes my phone go crazy?
justro said:
so i just flash threw recovery right? if i make a nandroid back up will it remove it if it makes my phone go crazy?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes
Sent From My Sprint Galaxy Nexus via XDA Premium
do I need to install anything else besides this .zip?
script manager?
setCPU??
anything?
Just installed combined with samurai kernal and let me say its pretty damn cool
Sent from my Sprint Galaxy Nexus CDMA using xda premium
broad_st_bully said:
do I need to install anything else besides this .zip?
script manager?
setCPU??
anything?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, the script looks for those programs and deactivates itself. You should only run this script for cpu scaling.
Sent from my Sprint Galaxy Nexus CDMA using Tapatalk 2
justro said:
Just installed combined with samurai kernal and let me say its pretty damn cool
Sent from my Sprint Galaxy Nexus CDMA using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just installed this combo. I'm using stock rom though. How's your bat life been?
Also are there any setting/options, I havent found any going through settings.
Is there a way to easily remove the script... another zip to flash perhaps? Or is a nandroid restore the only way?
In any case, thanks OP this looks good :thumbup:
Sent using Tapatalk 2
jten9 said:
Is there a way to easily remove the script... another zip to flash perhaps? Or is a nandroid restore the only way?
In any case, thanks OP this looks good :thumbup:
Sent using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You should be able to just delete the script from the init.d directory.
So far day one test and I'm loving the results so far
Sent from my Sprint Galaxy Nexus CDMA using xda premium
justro said:
So far day one test and I'm loving the results so far
Sent from my Sprint Galaxy Nexus CDMA using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks looks about right to me.
Sent from my Sprint Galaxy Nexus CDMA using Tapatalk 2
Bradart said:
You should be able to just delete the script from the init.d directory.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, easy enough!
Another noob question- what is an easy way to verify that the script is running? I think its possible to check with Script Manager (smanager), can anyone point me to directions? I didn't come up with much from searching...
If it matters, I'm running Franco m3 and stock rom
Sent using Tapatalk 2
justro said:
So far day one test and I'm loving the results so far
Sent from my Sprint Galaxy Nexus CDMA using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What's your screen on time?
Sent from my Sprint Galaxy Nexus CDMA using Tapatalk 2
This is what I've got today. Much improved compared to the same usage before I was getting approx 6-7hrs if I was lucky.
will this work with stock rom + kernal
raisinbagel said:
will this work with stock rom + kernal
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, you must have a kernel with init.d support.
Sent from my Sprint Galaxy Nexus CDMA using Tapatalk 2
raisinbagel said:
will this work with stock rom + kernal
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent From My Sprint Galaxy Nexus via XDA Premium
What kernel are you using?
Also with this work with franco and or samurai ? i keep switching back and forth not sure what one is better with black ice rom
cheddaface said:
What kernel are you using?
Also with this work with franco and or samurai ? i keep switching back and forth not sure what one is better with black ice rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It causes reboots on Franco milestone 3
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
I'm noticing a big battery drain from my screen, just curious what other peoples usage is like and what you have for brightness settings:
ROM: BlackIce Kangorade
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my Incredible 2 using xda app-developers app
I've always had the understanding that your screen should use the most. Here is mine in HORRIBLE coverage (no bars and back and forth from 3G to 1x) normally my screen % is pretty close to yours. I am running aokp build 38 with auto brightness oc to 1113 max 245 min uv -1 step across the board with smartassV2 governor and noop scheduler.
Sent from my ICS Dinc2
Aero's cm9 0712 v9 kernal
max cpu 1.3 and min 245
wifi, gps on and always on wifi at home
all sync is on.
sjpritch25 said:
Aero's cm9 0712 v9 kernal
max cpu 1.3 and min 245
wifi, gps on and always on wifi at home
all sync is on.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine usually looks like yours. Only difference in our setups is I'm on the v10 kernel. (Not 10.5)
Another way to increase battery life/decrease that screen percentage is to use custom backlight settings and levels. I found some in a thread here a while back that helped my battery life significantly on the stock battery. Using the same setup as above poster and the custom backlight settings I get ~3 days on an extended battery with light usage.
Sent from my Incredible 2 using xda premium
I think 10.5 is not great on battery life.
I can provide the v10 kernel via Dropbox if you guys want....I haven't seen it anywhere lately.
Credit to Aeroevan of course for the the awesome kernel.
http://db.tt/z04thxUt
Sent from my Incredible 2 using xda premium
jtsrtr13 said:
I can provide the v10 kernel via Dropbox if you guys want....I haven't seen it anywhere lately.
Credit to Aeroevan of course for the the awesome kernel.
http://db.tt/z04thxUt
Sent from my Incredible 2 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ive been running aeroeven v9 for a couple days now and I'm liking it, so I'm a little hesitant to try v10
Sent from my Incredible 2 using xda app-developers app
I'm also running Aeroevan's CM9 (7/12), but using the 10.5 kernel. No overclocking, and I have the brightness on auto at all times. Have the wifi on when at home, scarcely have GPS on. Sync on all the time. I usually get two days of battery life, but at that point the battery goes down to under 10%, so I usually charge at least once a day to keep it higher.
Aero's 0723 JB build & his kernel.
Sent from my Incredible 2 using xda app-developers app
sjpritch25 said:
Aero's 0723 JB build & his kernel.
Sent from my Incredible 2 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow, stock battery???
Sent from my Incredible 2 using xda app-developers app
Triscuit said:
Wow, stock battery???
Sent from my Incredible 2 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, but still not as good as aero's cm9 with his v9 kernal.
Im just curious to which roms are performing the best so I decided to start this thread. If you can post a screenshot of your benchmark score along with what rom you are running on your galaxy note 2 id just love to see how they compare. Im running jellybomb 10.0.1 with overclock to 1800 just wanna see if theres some tweaks I need to do or if my notes performing like it should lol thanks to the devs for all their hard work.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda app-developers app
I am on the stock rom no overclock.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda premium
Your results lead me to believe something is not quite right on my phone lol my results dont look much higher than yours and I think they should be with the overclock and everything, maybe its because I have my phone full of music and big games like gta 3 and max payne that take up a lot of space... kinda new to the whole custom rom thing lol so im not sure
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda app-developers app
Here's my scores . Got 7000
jelly bombed gnote 2
I'm just curious.. What's is it with benchmark scores? If your phone is running smooth without any lag and snappy shouldn't be any issues?
-TeaM VeNuM Like A Boss
-Galaxy Note II Edition
MiguelHogue said:
I'm just curious.. What's us it with benchmark scores? If your phone is running smooth without any lag and snappy shouldn't be any issues?
-TeaM VeNuM Like A Boss
-Galaxy Note II Edition
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My phone is fast and snappy, I was just curious about the benchmarks because it gives numbers to compare the phones by. Im very happy with the way mine works but if someone else's is working a lil better and I can see that on a bar graph like with the benchmark it lets me see which roms run better but I love jellybomb so I probably won't switch anyway lol I guess the short answer is just to satisfy my curiosity and just for comparisons sake
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda app-developers app
Omg_Its_Erie said:
My phone is fast and snappy, I was just curious about the benchmarks because it gives numbers to compare the phones by. Im very happy with the way mine works but if someone else's is working a lil better and I can see that on a bar graph like with the benchmark it lets me see which roms run better but I love jellybomb so I probably won't switch anyway lol I guess the short answer is just to satisfy my curiosity and just for comparisons sake
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Gotcha.. That's understandable.. I was hoping my question didn't see rude lol.. The was the last way I'd hope someone to take it... But I assume better benchmark scores will come about when the kernel for our phones can go past 1.8..which there's a issues with that due to the voltage past 1.8..It's more to it but I haven't followed the issue since 1.8 is good enough for me lol
-TeaM VeNuM Like A Boss
-Galaxy Note II Edition
No I didnt think you were rude at all lol just glad to see people are actually reading my posts
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda app-developers app
Note II Jellybombed
Admit what you can't deny and deny what you can't admit
Jellybomb 2, I've tried 4 different roms and they DHL have been pretty fast. I lik jellybomb the best.
Sent from my Super GN2 Untouchable
heres my scores
I know benchmarks don't mean much but here is my quadrant scores running Team VeNuM - STOCK L900VPALJC - DEODEXED. With Kernel Nov 17 Perseus oc to 1.8 with governor set to performance.
Just want to thank all the devs who helped make our note 2 even better.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Xparent Purple Tapatalk 2
Multi Benchmarks
N7100 running AssasinROM V6.0, SaberKernel 25.0, CPU at 1.92GHz, GPU at 800MHz. Running just a bit warmer than usual while benchmarking.
I got this with the Perseus Kernel running on Whompasaurus Rom. I have my CPU overclocked to 1.8 GHz and my GPU to 720 MHz. Runs great, and since the CPU isn't always running full speed, the battery life is great.
This is what I'm getting on stock rooted MC2 with Saber.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda app-developers app
t4d73 said:
This is what I'm getting on stock rooted MC2 with Saber.
View attachment 2041472View attachment 2041473
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Way frequencies are you running at (CPU and GPU) with the Saber kernel and how do they affect the battery life?
CorruptionDee said:
Way frequencies are you running at (CPU and GPU) with the Saber kernel and how do they affect the battery life?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well I've been rooted and overclocked since the day I got this device. Using perseus back then so I don't know how good battery life can really get. With Saber I'm overclocked to 1.92ghz but I am also hotpluging with Pegasusq so that I have all 4 cores running simultaneously together at max cpu. Gpu is maxed out too. I bought 3 extra batteries and a wall charger on amazon so juice is never an issue.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda app-developers app
Notice how low the percentage is at idle.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda app-developers app
t4d73 said:
Notice how low the percentage is at idle.
View attachment 2044597
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh ok. That makes far more sense as to why your quadrant is so high. I'm running Perseus Kernel at 1.8Ghz, but it doesn't always run full throttle.
CorruptionDee said:
Oh ok. That makes far more sense as to why your quadrant is so high. I'm running Perseus Kernel at 1.8Ghz, but it doesn't always run full throttle.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah if you really wanted it to hotpluging is the way to go and Pegasusq is the best governor for that. Has the most options of them all. I love Perseus kernel and it really is great but I love the extra speed with Saber. It flys! And that's putting it lightly lol!
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda app-developers app
Running MacksRom Plain Jane, with SaberKernal.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda premium
using root explorer or alike go to d/acpuclk/pvs_bin. Use text reader to open it and you should see a number. The higher the number the better quality your chip is suppose to be. I think highest is 0 or 6. 0-6
Tweaked Alpha powered by Lean Kernel
All credit sshafranko
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk
Mine was a zero! But like the man said it's either zero or 6 that's the highest. I run my cpu at 3.0 ghz. So... maybe 0 is good?
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk
mine was a 3...
i love being average :\
Ok found out the skinny.
0 requires the least power but is sensitive to overclock.
6 is resilient to overclock and consumes more power because of leakage.
You can read the articles by go ogling *snapdragon cpu bin*
So I guess my chip is a power saver. But I'm able to oc like crazy...so I don't know how significant this really is. My note 3 has been running at 2.8 ghz for DAYS without a problem.
So basically binning has to do with the chips leaking power with 6 being the #leakiest#
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk
janjannsen99 said:
Ok found out the skinny.
0 requires the least power but is sensitive to overclock.
6 is resilient to overclock and consumes more power because of leakage.
You can read the articles by go ogling *snapdragon cpu bin*
So I guess my chip is a power saver. But I'm able to oc like crazy...so I don't know how significant this really is. My note 3 has been running at 2.8 ghz for DAYS without a problem.
So basically binning has to do with the chips leaking power with 6 being the #leakiest#
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you tried benchmarking clocked to 2.8 and 3.0? I bet it reboots if you try it. I have a 3.
No reboots buddy
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
That's 2.8
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk
janjannsen99 said:
No reboots buddy
That's 2.8
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's a pretty low score for being clocked to 2.8, mine scores that clocked to 2.419 on saber. That's good it doesn't reboot anyways.
I don't really care about scores I have 400 apps man lol I think that might have a small impact on my score haha. Yes it does work no problem on 2.8 with a zero bin cpu. I use imoseyon kernel for daily driver. I've also been able to boot the 3 gigahertz kernel too for about 5 minutes before it crashes out.
But what the articles from qualcomm were saying that binning has more to do with power leakage than anything else, e.g. excessive heat, battery drain, etc. So the lower the number the more "efficient" the chip is but less stable and the higher less stable less efficient and more stable for overclock. Think like a boat. One has holes in it with 2 300hp Honda engines the other boat has few holes and 2 300hp off brand less powerful bootleg engines.
They still go just about as fast but one is a little slower. However on the other boat you're scooping water sometimes lol.
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk
I'm a 3 also
Sent from my SM-N900T using xda premium
janjannsen99 said:
using root explorer or alike go to d/acpuclk/pvs_bin. Use text reader to open it and you should see a number. The higher the number the better quality your chip is suppose to be. I think highest is 0 or 6. 0-6
Tweaked Alpha powered by Lean Kernel
All credit sshafranko
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm showing a 4. I wonder how much a difference this actually has in the phones, it seems pretty minimal to none.
1 here
Sent from my SM-N900T using xda app-developers app
Bin of 2 here. I'm all about the power saving though lol. I run 2.5ghz every now and then which is pretty stable haven't benchmarked with it though.
Sent from my SM-N900T
Also have 2 here.
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk 4
..
Wow 400 apps, I bet you use 375 of those apps once a year maybe....lol :good:
Quickvic30 said:
Wow 400 apps, I bet you use 375 of those apps once a year maybe....lol :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea I know. I gotta get rid of some man its crazy
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk
The binning seems pretty random. I wonder if it's even important at all. ..
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk
I am bin 2 and running 2.96 ghz
Sent from my SM-N900T
Ima a bin 3 and can over clock to 3ghz and underclock 75 on mpu so im good where i am
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk
2, running stock speeds and voltages (whatever compulsion standard kernel sets it at).