What speeds are you getting on T-Mobile with your Galaxy Nexus? - Samsung Galaxy Nexus

In addition to your average speed test speeds, could you please provide if your device is running a custom rom, radio version, and what city you live/operate in?
Thanks!
I'm running a Galaxy Nexus, and while I've heard of speeds up to 20mbs I've only been getting 2-6mbs and it's rather disappointing.

On my GNex I get 8-12 Mb down and 1.7Mb up. I'm on T-mobile in the Boston area. No custom ROMs, although it is rooted and I've manually updated up to ICL53F. I was only getting 750Kb with my N900 so I'm more than a little pleased.

andythefan said:
In addition to your average speed test speeds, could you please provide if your device is running a custom rom, radio version, and what city you live/operate in?
Thanks!
I'm running a Galaxy Nexus, and while I've heard of speeds up to 20mbs I've only been getting 2-6mbs and it's rather disappointing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is what you get on average and sounds correct. May be if you are in very good coverage area, you may get 8-9 but on average what you are getting is pretty norm. And personally this is more than enough speed for streaming and browsing, but agree everyone has different needs.
It is highly unlikely to get 20 Mbps on tmobile or ATT hspa networks.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk

I have a friend who was running the Galaxy Skyrocket (SGSII branded for AT&T) who has "4G" in an area with 4G coverage and he boasted 20+mbs easily. I'm guessing since not many customers have access to 4G yet the networks don't have to share bandwidth and can be that quick. Is this true to how cell towers work?
It's just disappointing that T-Mobile's "4G" network is so slow and inconsistent, yet they don't have plans to upgrade their towers or change to different data service.

andythefan said:
I have a friend who was running the Galaxy Skyrocket (SGSII branded for AT&T) who has "4G" in an area with 4G coverage and he boasted 20+mbs easily. I'm guessing since not many customers have access to 4G yet the networks don't have to share bandwidth and can be that quick. Is this true to how cell towers work?
It's just disappointing that T-Mobile's "4G" network is so slow and inconsistent, yet they don't have plans to upgrade their towers or change to different data service.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Skyrocket is an LTE device. Not HSPA+.

How is 6mbps disappointing?
Are you torrenting movies or something?
Webpages load fast on a solid H+ connection, I can't believe people aren't satisfied with HSPA+ speeds.
I get anywhere between 2.5 to 9mbps depending on where I am.

I've hit 10mbps in the bay area, but i average 4-6mbps. I'm on the $30 100-min prepaid plan. Stock 4.0.1

Best: 5.38Mbps down 1.42Mbps up 145ms
Worst: 1.33 down .29 up 102ms
Average: 2.5Mbps up 1Mbps down 100ms
Location: Broward County Florida. According to T-Mobile a 42mbps area.
Rom: Android Revolution 2.12 Android 4.02 Baseband: XXKK1
I'm dissapointed only because i've seen phones in tmobile stores reach 22-23 and mine gets around 4-5. very aggrivating to see that. but i'm fine with the speeds i'm getting for what i do, but it is annoying to see phones in the same location get better speeds.
however, my nexus one for the last year almost never got over 1.5 so this is a huge step up from that.

Around where I work near Long Beach, I only get 2-3mbps up and around 1 down.

Usually 7-8 down and 2 up in San Antonio, which is good enough for me
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App

neok44 said:
evolution 2.12 Android 4.02 Baseband: XXKK1
I'm dissapointed only because i've seen phones in tmobile stores reach 22-23 and mine gets around 4-5. very aggrivating to see that. but i'm fine with the speeds i'm getting for what i do, but it is annoying to see phones in the same location get better speeds.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree. I was either getting the Galaxy Nexus or the Galaxy S II for T-Mobile. The GSII is really looking a lot better now. Way faster transfer speeds, better camera, and possibly a better processor.
I'm paying the same amount for data each month, I feel disappointed that the Galaxy Nexus can only get a fourth of what other phones on the same network are capable of.

neok44 said:
Best: 5.38Mbps down 1.42Mbps up 145ms
Worst: 1.33 down .29 up 102ms
Average: 2.5Mbps up 1Mbps down 100ms
Location: Broward County Florida. According to T-Mobile a 42mbps area.
Rom: Android Revolution 2.12 Android 4.02 Baseband: XXKK1
I'm dissapointed only because i've seen phones in tmobile stores reach 22-23 and mine gets around 4-5. very aggrivating to see that. but i'm fine with the speeds i'm getting for what i do, but it is annoying to see phones in the same location get better speeds.
however, my nexus one for the last year almost never got over 1.5 so this is a huge step up from that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The galaxy nexus doesn't support 42 mbps down, so you are disappointed your phone doesn't get speeds it isn't supposed to?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

andythefan said:
I agree. I was either getting the Galaxy Nexus or the Galaxy S II for T-Mobile. The GSII is really looking a lot better now. Way faster transfer speeds, better camera, and possibly a better processor.
I'm paying the same amount for data each month, I feel disappointed that the Galaxy Nexus can only get a fourth of what other phones on the same network are capable of.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the galaxy nexus still puts the GS2 to shame just because of ICS. I was the same, GS2 or GN, and honestly i don't regret my decision at all. Yes the GS2 gets better download, and has a better camera, but the GN is an overall better device just because of stock ICS. and there is no way of knowing when the GS2 will get ICS.
As far as the download speeds go, i have absolutly no proof of this, and tmonews has said that they know nothing. But i honestly think that tmobile does something to unknown devices to drop their speed. because if i can walk into a tmobile store and see 3 phones get 18-33Mbps, then the galaxy nexus should easily be hitting aroud 10-20, not 5.

neok44 said:
the galaxy nexus still puts the GS2 to shame just because of ICS. I was the same, GS2 or GN, and honestly i don't regret my decision at all. Yes the GS2 gets better download, and has a better camera, but the GN is an overall better device just because of stock ICS. and there is no way of knowing when the GS2 will get ICS.
As far as the download speeds go, i have absolutly no proof of this, and tmonews has said that they know nothing. But i honestly think that tmobile does something to unknown devices to drop their speed. because if i can walk into a tmobile store and see 3 phones get 18-33Mbps, then the galaxy nexus should easily be hitting aroud 10-20, not 5.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's called a controlled QoS. They prioritize their own IMEI's.

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
RADIO: XXKK6
ROM: AOKP
KERNEL: Franco
Something went weird with the ping on the speedtest

13-16meg down - Verizon LTE - burbs of Chicago.

8 Mbps down | 3 Mbps up | Ping ~120ms
Stock 4.0.2 with XXKK6 baseband
St. Paul MN
I got these same speeds when I had the Sensation so I don't think they prioritize their own IMEI's.

zephiK said:
RADIO: XXKK6
ROM: AOKP
KERNEL: Franco
Something went weird with the ping on the speedtest
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is this on TMobile? I thought the HPSA+ showed up as "H" above the signal bars and not "4G"

tclarkey said:
13-16meg down - Verizon LTE - burbs of Chicago.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This thread is about T-mobile. NOT Verizon.

joshnichols189 said:
The galaxy nexus doesn't support 42 mbps down, so you are disappointed your phone doesn't get speeds it isn't supposed to?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not a dumb ass, i know that, but in a 42Mbps area on a phone thats capable of 21Mbps, it should not be getting 5Mbps.
milan03 said:
It's called a controlled QoS. They prioritize their own IMEI's.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you know for a fact that T-Mobile does this? Another interesting reason why i don't think tmobile does is because my dads Samsung Vibrant, which is capable of 7Mbps download, has never gotten over 3, even when my nexus one used to get 5. And my Galaxy Nexus continues to beat his by 1-2Mbps on average.

Related

[Q] HSPA+ 21Mbps, Speedtests?

Hi so I know the Galaxy Nexus is only going to be using the 21mbps HSPA+, so anyone know what the average download speed is usually? ..maybe someone living in NYC ran some speedtests?
btw although ive heard multiple times that the nexus will have HSPA+ 21Mbps, but didnt google/samsung didnt they show a chart at the ICS unveiling that the nexus would go up to 42Mbps on HSPA+ ?
My 5 mbps might be your 2mbps. Locations will vary, as will all the other factors. And no, 21mbps max for the modem inside your phone. Cant exceed that.
I invented cyberspace. You're trespassing.
Well living in amajor city, with great coverage, what kind of speeds can I expect? I'm hoping for at least 10mbps during low congestion and at least a reliable 4mbps during peak hours.
But yeah there was a chart at the ics unveiling that showed the nexus using HSPA+ 42mbps. Maybe the USA gsm model will be able to take advantage of the high end tmo and att 4g networks like the TMo SGS2 can
Sent from the parietal lobe of your cerebral cortex.
You can't expect anything. The phone isn't what determines the speed, the network does. You could get different speeds on different sides of the street with the same phone and same network.
You shouldn't expect this phone to give you any faster/slower speed than another HSPA+ phone on T-mobile in the same location. You'll have to see for yourself.
The current version of the HSPA+ Galaxy Nexus is 21mbps. You won't see real-world 21mbps on T-mobile any time soon, so don't worry about it not being a 42mbps modem lol.
martonikaj said:
You can't expect anything. The phone isn't what determines the speed, the network does. You could get different speeds on different sides of the street with the same phone and same network.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How about the radio then.. it should be able to use TMO/ATT's 42Mbps HSPA+ right?
Dmw017 said:
How about the radio then.. it should be able to use TMO/ATT's 42Mbps HSPA+ right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well of course if the phone only has an HSPA+ 21mbps radio, it can't go faster than that....
And FWIW I don't think AT&T has anything more than 21mbps deployed widely. Most areas are still on 14.4mbps, or even 7mbps HSPA.
I am in Minneapolis right by 4g towers and I only get 5 mbps download on my T-Mobile galaxy s2 (42mbps) so those numbers mean absolutely nothing. You will never even hit the basic 14.4
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
martonikaj said:
Well of course if the phone only has an HSPA+ 21mbps radio, it can't go faster than that....
And FWIW I don't think AT&T has anything more than 21mbps deployed widely. Most areas are still on 14.4mbps, or even 7mbps HSPA.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that's my question I guess, does the phone in fact have a 21mbps radio or the new 42mbps one :x I know the omap4460 processor can't do LTE but HSPA+ shouldnt be a problem
Edit: Ah found the pic from the ICS unveiling.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Dmw017 said:
that's my question I guess, does the phone in fact have a 21mbps radio or the new 42mbps one :x I know the omap4460 processor can't do LTE but HSPA+ shouldnt be a problem
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just like I said before, it has a pentaband HSPA+ 21mbps radio.
Towle said:
I am in Minneapolis right by 4g towers and I only get 5 mbps download on my T-Mobile galaxy s2 (42mbps) so those numbers mean absolutely nothing. You will never even hit the basic 14.4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Like we've said, that's your experience with your area and your phone. I have a G2 (which as 14.4mbps HSPA+) and I can easily pull 10mbps down. Others have reported pulling upwards of 15mbps on various HSPA+ devices. Its definitely possible, but not something that people can come to expect as "normal" speeds.
My nexus s is theoretically capable of 7 mbit. I get anywhere from 1 to mid 4's usually. I'll take whatever 21mbit support nets. I would be tickled pink if it got 5-10 consistently.
Edit: NYC
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk
martonikaj said:
Just like I said before, it has a pentaband HSPA+ 21mbps radio.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh sorry I missed the edit in your last post. Has the radio been confirmed to be 21 or is that speculation?
Dmw017 said:
Oh sorry I missed the edit in your last post. Has the radio been confirmed to be 21 or is that speculation?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is confirmed. All that picture is showing is that LTE's theoretical speeds are higher than HSPA+ 42mbps theoretical speeds.
All we know right now is that there are 2 versions to be released. 1 has CDMA/LTE, and 1 has GSM/HSPA+ 21.
martonikaj said:
It is confirmed. All that picture is showing is that LTE's theoretical speeds are higher than HSPA+ 42mbps theoretical speeds.
All we know right now is that there are 2 versions to be released. 1 has CDMA/LTE, and 1 has GSM/HSPA+ 21.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
awesome, thanks :}
21Mbps is fine, I'm coming from Verizon's 3G which did like 1mbps on average so this is a step up lol
Dmw017 said:
awesome, thanks :}
21Mbps is fine, I'm coming from Verizon's 3G which did like 1mbps on average so this is a step up lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And that's why they have to have an LTE version. Because CDMA is slooooooow.
pukemon said:
My 5 mbps might be your 2mbps. Locations will vary, as will all the other factors. And no, 21mbps max for the modem inside your phone. Cant exceed that.
I invented cyberspace. You're trespassing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually, you can.
T-Mobile's HSPA+ network runs on a 42Mbps speed.
hotleadsingerguy said:
Actually, you can.
T-Mobile's HSPA+ network runs on a 42Mbps speed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But the phone only has a 21mbps modem.
Then what was the purpose of showing HSPA+42 in the chart if the galaxy nexus will not be able to use it? I'm wondering because I am on Tmobile and I was so sure it would be on Tmobile's new HSPA+42 network.
Sent from my Sensation using xda premium
I never saw over 7Mbps in Atlanta. Calling HSPA+ "4G" is just blatant false advertising. I easily get 28Mbps on LTE in the same areas.
--
Sent from my Droid Bionic.
TheBiles said:
I never saw over 7Mbps in Atlanta. Calling HSPA+ "4G" is just blatant false advertising. I easily get 28Mbps on LTE in the same areas.
--
Sent from my Droid Bionic.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What phone did you have in Tmobile's network? Because with Tmobile's theoretical speeds you can cut that in half for real world speeds (i.e. Tmobile's HSPA+42 theoretical speeds is around 21mbps real speeds).
Sent from my Sensation using xda premium
Tone503773 said:
What phone did you have in Tmobile's network? Because with Tmobile's theoretical speeds you can cut that in half for real world speeds (i.e. Tmobile's HSPA+42 theoretical speeds is around 21mbps real speeds).
Sent from my Sensation using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The G2, MT4G, and Sensation.

[Q] Sprint 3G always really slow?

I'm coming from HSPA+ speeds on T-Mobile, so I was wondering if EVDO speeds on Sprint are supposed to be this slow? EVDO should be capable of at least 1 Mbps.
I'm consistently getting less than 300 kbps download, so are Sprint's EVDO speeds really closer to EDGE than 3G?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk 2
etirkca said:
I'm coming from HSPA+ speeds on T-Mobile, so I was wondering if EVDO speeds on Sprint are supposed to be this slow? EVDO should be capable of at least 1 Mbps.
I'm consistently getting <300 kbps download, so are Sprint's EVDO speeds really closer to EDGE than 3G?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would say it depends on the time + place your using 3G at. I sometimes get as low as your saying but sometimes can get over 1MB but only at certain times and certain places.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA
They are usually pretty good. Id suggest trying the 3g turbocharger. Its never disappointed me. I usually can only get around .60mbps.
This is with it :
This is with out it :
Sent from my SPH-D700 using xda premium
Honestly, sprint is just awful in some areas. I'm okay with it because I pay a lot less and usually have wifi anyway, but yea, the service is just pathetic.
In LA, I regularly get 5-50 kb/s download and upload with 3g. If I'm lucky, I'll get around 300--this happens maybe 1/10 days. This is in a flat, well populated area of Los Angeles, not a boonie by any means. It's really disappointing.
4g, when it (rarely) works, is also way slower than I had hoped for... maybe 1.8 down, 200 up.
Funny thing about unlimited data is that with crap speeds like this, I could probably download all month long and not reach the limit of other providers...
I am occasionally able to hit 1000 kbps up and down but at my house it's normally about 300 kbps each. I had 4G today and it was a pitiful 500 kbps down and 50 kbps up with a ping of 500. Be glad you have data at all...
Sent from My Phone with An App.
Xinlitik said:
Honestly, sprint is just awful in some areas. I'm okay with it because I pay a lot less and usually have wifi anyway, but yea, the service is just pathetic.
In LA, I regularly get 5-50 kb/s download and upload with 3g. If I'm lucky, I'll get around 300--this happens maybe 1/10 days. This is in a flat, well populated area of Los Angeles, not a boonie by any means. It's really disappointing.
4g, when it (rarely) works, is also way slower than I had hoped for... maybe 1.8 down, 200 up.
Funny thing about unlimited data is that with crap speeds like this, I could probably download all month long and not reach the limit of other providers...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You would think that in LA we'd get better service?! I usually get 0.5 mbs up and down on 3g and 4-5mbs down and 1-2 mbs up in my area though...
Sprint putting up lte... that's been the cause of all the crappy data... I'm almost certain somebody had a picture of them putting stuff up in los Angeles and their 3g was down and 4g was pitiful.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using xda premium
IronReaver17 said:
You would think that in LA we'd get better service?! I usually get 0.5 mbs up and down on 3g and 4-5mbs down and 1-2 mbs up in my area though...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No kidding. The population density here seems like it would be a good cost-value job to throw in more towers...
Network vision is underway in LA, which will affect certain areas and connectivity
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk
It's official. Sprint has the worst 3G and 4G speeds among major carriers. :thumbdown: I'm not surprised at all.
http://m.gizmodo.com/5902947/which-carriers-have-the-fastest-3g-and-4g-connections/gallery/
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk 2
Not compared to ****ty ATT Hspa! Absolute crap in Daytona area. Barely get Sprint 3G speeds out of it. ATT has barely started their LTE rollout.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using xda premium
etirkca said:
I'm coming from HSPA+ speeds on T-Mobile, so I was wondering if EVDO speeds on Sprint are supposed to be this slow? EVDO should be capable of at least 1 Mbps.
I'm consistently getting <300 kbps download, so are Sprint's EVDO speeds really closer to EDGE than 3G?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's true. Sprint really is just that awful. Sprint's "3G" is slower than AT&T's 2G. I'm still happier than I was with AT&T, though, since I always have some kind of data signal on Sprint. I might be roaming, and I might get only 5kbps down, but at least I have something. On AT&T I would frequently have ZERO signal and my phone was a worthless oversized paperweight.
Sitting in my own living room, where I have 5 full bars of Sprint 3G signal, I have similar speed to what you posted. Yours might be a bit faster, actually. This is completely normal average speed -- I am fairly certain that Sprint is NOT doing these "network vision" upgrades in east Texas anytime soon, if ever. Contrast that with Verizon -- my buddy was sitting right next to me with maxed out LTE signal, pulling 30mbps on the same speed test. That's faster than my Roadrunner Elite. He then dropped to Verizon 3G and got about 5mbps down. On both tests, his ping was <100ms and mine was >500ms.
I firmly believe that the only reason Sprint still offers "unlimited" data is that there is no need for a cap -- you are limited directly by the speed of your connection and you cannot reasonably even come close to 5GB of data usage in a month. Unless you have consistent Wimax signal, which I estimate maybe 1% of their subscribers have.
etirkca said:
It's official. Sprint has the worst 3G and 4G speeds among major carriers. :thumbdown: I'm not surprised at all.
http://m.gizmodo.com/5902947/which-carriers-have-the-fastest-3g-and-4g-connections/gallery/
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
tmobile seems to want to have it both ways. they call their hspa+ 4g, but then throw it in to comparisons against other carriers 3g.
le boo.
from the article... T-Mobile's HSPA+ 21 service won in the 3G bracket of our study, and the company's high-end HSPA+ 42 service competed reasonably well with other providers' 4G service.
3g speeds are poor in some areas but recently have seen a slight improvement in my area. I'm hoping the network vision upgrades will help like they say it will.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA
Obviously there is no credibility to that article. There are several places around Daytona that I get over 1Mbs on 3G. I can just as easily measure ATT's 4G in my area to show it slower than Sprint's 3G. Most of the time I have to toggle airplane mode on the stupid ATT phone from work just to get it to load my work screen.
Different areas have different speeds... I get 1.5-2 mbps on 3g.... of course about 2 months ago I was only getting .30 mbps on 3g... 4g is super fast though. Lol
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk 2
I had been using the EL30 modem for quite some time and 3G speeds were horrid around the Chicago suburbs. Like bad bad. If I wasn't on 4G, I didn't even want to use my phone for anything data related.
I know NV is being deployed around this area right now, but I recently switched to the FC09 modem, and it's a night and day difference. I used to get around 0.1Mbps if I was luckly. Lately, since the switch, I've been getting more closer to 0.8-1.0Mbps which I'm quite happy with considering it's 3G.
4G I usually pull around 5-7Mbps down (but have hit 10 a few times; that's a full 1MBps down) and I usually cap it at the 1.5MBps up. That's faster than my wifi at home through AT&T UVerse.
Average Sprint 3G data speeds decreased from 2011 to 2012. Maybe because of the influx of iPhone customers?
Welcome to Sprint. Where the 3G is 2G, and the 4G is 3G.
http://www.pcworld.com/article/2538...peed_showdown_which_networks_are_fastest.html
So my question to you is; why'd you leave T-mobile? If they were so great for you, you should have stayed with Big Magenta.
I'm not being flippant here. Carriers are like organized religion. What works for one person offends someone else. In the end, all of us get through to The Supreme Being.
I, personally, always find myself on Wi-Fi so I don't give a crap.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using xda premium
orlzzt said:
So my question to you is; why'd you leave T-mobile? If they were so great for you, you should have stayed with Big Magenta.
I'm not being flippant here. Carriers are like organized religion. What works for one person offends someone else. In the end, all of us get through to The Supreme Being.
I, personally, always find myself on Wi-Fi so I don't give a crap.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're right. I should have stayed.
With my corporate discount, my equivalent plan on Sprint is cheaper, so I switched. It's too bad that article showing crappy Sprint data speeds didn't come out earlier, I probably would have stuck with T.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk 2

GSM Nexus speed on AT&T (Austin, TX)

I don't know if this is a question or more of a poll...
I think I'm getting horrible 3G speeds here in Austin, TX. It also seems like I'm being capped. When I have full bars, speedtest always shows around a 3Mbps down and 1 Mbps up transfer speeds. I've tested this in many places around North Austin / Round Rock.
What speeds are others getting?
Could my sim card or data plan need tweaking from AT&T? I ask this because I was previously on a Galaxy Note with LTE and they had to switch me to a LTE plan at the time. Outside where I work, the LTE signal strength is very strong and I've gotten amazing speeds with the Note. But with the Nexus, I get the 3/1 speeds.
Any ideas?
What are your APN settings, also are you on the smartphone or medianet plan?
allyourbase said:
What are your APN settings, also are you on the smartphone or medianet plan?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you for helping me.
I'm on a smartphone plan. Which APN settings are you wanting? There are a lot!
I live in Bastrop, like 30 miles east of Austin, and am getting about 2.5-3 down and .4-1.2 up. I was pretty disappointed because I thought I had remembered pulling more on my Captivate(smart phone plan though), too bad it broke. I'm using the MediaNet plan on ATT with AndroidHD Revolution(4.1.1) and Franco r223.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
If you're on the smartphone plan, I'm assuming you're using the "phone" apn? Also, you're aware that you can get unlimited hspa with the non smartphone plan formerly known as media net.
Who knows this could be purely speculation but let's say AT&T already has your imei number you could be automatically bumped to the same smartphone data plan if you attempt to use the dumb phone plan.
I am unsure how quick AT&T is figuring this stuff out. I had an AT&T GS2 and switched to a dumb flip phone then bought a GNex, took the sim card out of the dumb one and transplanted into the GNex and boom, unlimited data and texting for $30 a month.
I'm already on an unlimited smartphone plan. I chatted with AT&T support and there are currently no restrictions on my data plan. He also switch IMEI from the Note to the Nexus and moved me from a LTE plan to 3G plan. Data speeds remain the same.
I wonder if anyone with a GSM Nexus in Austin is able to get > 3Mbps...
Try the phone apn?
allyourbase said:
Try the phone apn?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sorry. I guess I don't know what you mean?
those speeds are normal for a 3G smartphone. Even with HSPA+. Remember, the Unlocked Nexus isn't LTE.
dwd3885 said:
those speeds are normal for a 3G smartphone. Even with HSPA+. Remember, the Unlocked Nexus isn't LTE.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just did a test a few days ago and got this...
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
dschreiber69 said:
I just did a test a few days ago and got this...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are on a SGS2 with HSPA+? Which city are you in?
Try testing with actual downloads instead of speed test sites. My speed test (I'm in northern Colorado) always tells me about 3Mb/s down 1Mb/s up too, but on actual downloads and manual tests, I hit 8-10 Mb/s even in kind of rural areas.
I'm in Indiana and get around 3-4mbit down and 1-1.5mbit up. The fastest ive seen once is 7mbit down.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
I remember with the captivate, the speeds would vary widely depending on which part of town I was in. But with the Nexus, it just seems very artificial to hit right around 3 down / 1 up every time. Almost like AT&T is capping it similar to what they did to the captivate. The modem AT&T put on the captivate was throttled for whatever reason but flashing an international modem removed it.
flintdragon said:
I remember with the captivate, the speeds would vary widely depending on which part of town I was in. But with the Nexus, it just seems very artificial to hit right around 3 down / 1 up every time. Almost like AT&T is capping it similar to what they did to the captivate. The modem AT&T put on the captivate was throttled for whatever reason but flashing an international modem removed it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ATT uses QoS to determine which devices on their network receive priority as well. Iphones receive the most for cell phones of course.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
In san diego the best and average i get is 3.5 mbps down. I am on the unlimited medianet plan
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
flintdragon said:
You are on a SGS2 with HSPA+? Which city are you in?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah. I had to send my Gnex in for service. Only got to use it for 17 days
Harbor Springs Michigan
Sorry to bring back an old thread, but I am wondering on this myself. I bought my gnex from google play, got it and noticed that the data rates are pretty steady at around 2.5 - 3.5 max down, and .9 - 1.2 up. The gnex has a 21Mbit HSPA+ radio in it, so in theory it should accept whatever AT&T can push to it. However, I came from an Atrix 2, and can vouch for the fact that the Atrix 2 when using the PTA APN on HSPA+ (no LTE for about 200 miles where I'm at) will download consistently between 7 - 9 Mbit... Same server on speediest.net, same APN, same place, the signal is within 1dBm of each other.
Because I have found no base band that can change this, nor any APN setting I am starting to believe that if AT&T gets an IMEI of a phone that it doesnt recognize, they will throttle it.
Any one else have any insight? 3.5Mbit is plenty, but I'd like to get the same speeds as what I consider a lesser device.
If I could find a way to change the IMEI I'd test this theory.
^^^ Suprisingly, Its not att at all. Ask anyone on these forums, samsung has notoriously bad radios. Signal and cell strength just are not that great. And you can you can especially feel the difference coming from a motorola device. They have the strongest radios of all the major oems by far. No one even comes close.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
thekurrgan said:
Sorry to bring back an old thread, but I am wondering on this myself. I bought my gnex from google play, got it and noticed that the data rates are pretty steady at around 2.5 - 3.5 max down, and .9 - 1.2 up. The gnex has a 21Mbit HSPA+ radio in it, so in theory it should accept whatever AT&T can push to it. However, I came from an Atrix 2, and can vouch for the fact that the Atrix 2 when using the PTA APN on HSPA+ (no LTE for about 200 miles where I'm at) will download consistently between 7 - 9 Mbit... Same server on speediest.net, same APN, same place, the signal is within 1dBm of each other.
Because I have found no base band that can change this, nor any APN setting I am starting to believe that if AT&T gets an IMEI of a phone that it doesnt recognize, they will throttle it.
Any one else have any insight? 3.5Mbit is plenty, but I'd like to get the same speeds as what I consider a lesser device.
If I could find a way to change the IMEI I'd test this theory.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for this update. just saw it. It's frustrating knowing our phones could do so much better.

Question about 4G

I live in Denver and this is my first 4G phone but I don't get 4G anywhere when my dad who has a Nexus gets it. Is it because this is an LTE phone? Do I have to wait for LTE towers? I can't use regular 4G in the mean time?
You have to wait for LTE. Denver will be a while. A year +.
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2
TrollMctrollington said:
I live in Denver and this is my first 4G phone but I don't get 4G anywhere when my dad who has a Nexus gets it. Is it because this is an LTE phone? Do I have to wait for LTE towers? I can't use regular 4G in the mean time?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I believe the nexus is wimax 4g. Which is ok, but once lte gets some steam and all the switches get turned on it should blow wimax or if the water I'm terms of speed.
And once Sprint turns their old Nextel network to the “new“ Sprint network we should get better service and building penetration.
Sent from Pluto.
Speedin07si said:
I believe the nexus is wimax 4g. Which is ok, but once lte gets some steam and all the switches get turned on it should blow wimax or if the water I'm terms of speed.
And once Sprint turns their old Nextel network to the “new“ Sprint network we should get better service and building penetration.
Sent from Pluto.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Galaxy Nexus is an LTE device. If that phone is getting a 4G signal then your S3 should as well.
TrollMctrollington said:
I live in Denver and this is my first 4G phone but I don't get 4G anywhere when my dad who has a Nexus gets it. Is it because this is an LTE phone? Do I have to wait for LTE towers? I can't use regular 4G in the mean time?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the galaxy nexus is 4g lte the nexus s is 4g WiMax. Which device does he have?
Sent from my SPH-L710 using xda app-developers app
They're the same carrier?
You have Sprint, your dad has sprint? ....Right?
Felnarion said:
They're the same carrier?
You have Sprint, your dad has sprint? ....Right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah. Both Sprint. His phone is maybe two years old now. The Nexus with the curvy screen. But that might not help because I can't remember if they all have that.
TrollMctrollington said:
Yeah. Both Sprint. His phone is maybe two years old now. The Nexus with the curvy screen. But that might not help because I can't remember if they all have that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That means he has the old Nexus S 4G, which uses Sprint's now-legacy Wimax standard and calls that 4G. Your GS3 does not handle Wimax, which will be phased out, but rather the new LTE 4G.
But Sprint's LTE network is very new, and has only been launched in a few cities so far. And according to the running schedule at S4GRU.com, Denver is not in line for LTE service for many months.
Mctrollington, im in denver/aurora and might get the sg3 but not sure how sprint service is without wimax as i have nan epic 4g? Are u getting decent speeds on 3g?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
nom303 said:
Mctrollington, im in denver/aurora and might get the sg3 but not sure how sprint service is without wimax as i have nan epic 4g? Are u getting decent speeds on 3g?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm in the Denver area also, and just replaced a wimax Epic 4G with the SGS3. Personally I found wimax spotty at best. When it worked I got something like 2 or 3 mb downloads (not that great) but you had to be in just the right spot to get a decent wimax signal.
With the SGS3 using 3G I'm getting between 0.5 and 1.5 mb downloads (much better than I used to with the Epic), which is certainly tolerable unless you plan on downloading movies or doing heavy tethering. Again, it depends on the what cell site you are connected to and how many bars you have. Sprint's Network Vision upgrades are improving the data capacity of their 3G sites, and that is going on right now even before the LTE install.
I would say if 4G data speeds are important to you, try to hang on as long as you can before you upgrade. In my case my old Epic was getting pretty beat up and the SGS3 kept calling my name. I don't miss wimax one bit.
Oh, and the stock ICS experience with the SGS3 is WAY smoother and more polished than any ICS rom on the Epic ever was. Nothing like having gobs of ram and 16 megs of app storage built in to make things hum right along.
poit said:
I would say if 4G data speeds are important to you, try to hang on as long as you can before you upgrade. In my case my old Epic was getting pretty beat up and the SGS3 kept calling my name. I don't miss wimax one bit.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's good advice in general. I'm in Austin, and I happen to get decent Wimax coverage in my office. So I held on with my Epic for a bit before biting on the GS3 recently.
But LTE service is supposed to come here pretty soon, and it seemed like fun to search for service and test it even before launch. For an ordinary user with good Wimax service today and no early prospect of LTE, I would not recommend the GS3 today unless you also choose to jump carriers. (Which raises other issues of price, data caps, etc.)
boomerbubba said:
That's good advice in general. I'm in Austin, and I happen to get decent Wimax coverage in my office. So I held on with my Epic for a bit before biting on the GS3 recently.
But LTE service is supposed to come here pretty soon, and it seemed like fun to search for service and test it even before launch. For an ordinary user with good Wimax service today and no early prospect of LTE, I would not recommend the GS3 today unless you also choose to jump carriers. (Which raises other issues of price, data caps, etc.)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
After I switched off my Epic for the S3, my Epic still gets Wimax...
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2
a454nova said:
After I switched off my Epic for the S3, my Epic still gets Wimax...
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm. Without activation? I have to try that.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
That's basically what's up in the Denver Area. Downtown gets a little faster. I am not often in Aurora but I think it's similar.
When I'm in Littleton I get absolutely no Sprint Network. It's all roaming.
I typically use WiFi. My 3G use is for tweeting, RTD navigation and a little Facebook. I have no problems or complaints with those.
TrollMctrollington said:
That's basically what's up in the Denver Area. Downtown gets a little faster. I am not often in Aurora but I think it's similar.
When I'm in Littleton I get absolutely no Sprint Network. It's all roaming.
I typically use WiFi. My 3G use is for tweeting, RTD navigation and a little Facebook. I have no problems or complaints with those.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sad but that how it is... I never have issues wIth coverage in Littleton tho. 3pm is peak too. expect Is to be slow. I avg 500kbps to 1.6 max in the Denver area (mostly Aurora).
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2
a454nova said:
Sad but that how it is... I never have issues wIth coverage in Littleton tho. 3pm is peak too. expect Is to be slow. I avg 500kbps to 1.6 max in the Denver area (mostly Aurora).
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you have roaming set auto? Or Sprint only?
TrollMctrollington said:
Do you have roaming set auto? Or Sprint only?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's on auto but I never roam. You might have an issue going on. Where are you having issues at? You on CM10?
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

Wimax McLovin

I live in Orange Country, California. There's Wimax blanketing the whole county. I love it.
Unfortunately, no LTE yet. ETA mid-next-year.
I, recently, upgraded to the S3. I tried it out for more than a week. I love the phone with all its bells and whistles. However, because there's no LTE in my area, I was connecting to the 3G. And, it's horridly SLOW.
So, I decided to switch back to my S2 Epic Touch and take advantage of the Wimax speed until LTE comes to my area.
Am I crazy? I'm wondering if anybody else have had the same experience.
You're not crazy at all. I'm currently in Orange County too, specifically Orange/Garden Grove. I love the 4G at my work office. My 4G pulls 8mbps down, inside the building. But LTE rollouts in OC shouldn't take much longer, I'll be ready to buy a Galaxy Nexus or S3 when it does.
knite75 said:
I live in Orange Country, California. There's Wimax blanketing the whole county. I love it.
Unfortunately, no LTE yet. ETA mid-next-year.
I, recently, upgraded to the S3. I tried it out for more than a week. I love the phone with all its bells and whistles. However, because there's no LTE in my area, I was connecting to the 3G. And, it's horridly SLOW.
So, I decided to switch back to my S2 Epic Touch and take advantage of the Wimax speed until LTE comes to my area.
Am I crazy? I'm wondering if anybody else have had the same experience.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope not crazy at all.. I was actually thinking about getting the note 2 but it's no lte here in DC yet; great 4G tho.. And I use my 4G a lot to tether and watch videos.. So I been thinking about that before I go get it next week
-TeaM VeNuM Like A Boss
Yeah, me no loco!
I really like the current generation of phones. For instance, the EVO 4G LTE has one of the best camera. The aperture is F2.0. Wow! It's awesome for me, because I frequently take pictures of my little daughter. But, that too, I quickly returned, because I couldn't stand the horrid 3G speed.
Yupz, I'm also in Orange County enjoying great 4G WiMax speeds. Not gonna upgrade to an LTE phone until LTE actually gets here.
I Live in craptastic Oklahoma with no 4G I however visited Orange County a while back and was shocked at how amazing the 4G was. At most places it proved faster than the wifi I could use. Can't say the same for a recent trip to St Louis.
Funny such big cities have to wait on LTE, mine will be live by Xmas time and I'm in the sticks. But mines included in like a 1/4 state upgrade covering about 4 major cities and 20 smaller cities. I'm just trying to decide what to blow my upgrade on
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
LOL so true. When I'm at Starbucks, I don't connect to their hotspots anymore. Much slower than my Wimax
geeksmurf said:
I Live in craptastic Oklahoma with no 4G I however visited Orange County a while back and was shocked at how amazing the 4G was. At most places it proved faster than the wifi I could use. Can't say the same for a recent trip to St Louis.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you live in a Wimax area with no lte, there is no reason to upgrade. Its the reason sprint is still supporting this phone I think.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2
Frankly, if Wimax and LTE is not available in your area and their 3G is your only avenue, i wouldn't recommend Sprint at all. "Unlimited" data is irrelevant if you're speeding along at a horrid rate. Smartphones need a decent network connection to function at all.
Don't get me wrong, I love Sprint. Their customer service is great. You can get a live person (from USA) customer service within 30 second when calling in. And, their online customer service chat is fantastic too.
**BOFA** said:
Welllll, must be nice. I have no 4g wimax nor lte here with an eta of 2015. No matter which phone i get, unless i switch carriers, is gonna suck nuts! Thanks for making me feel terrible.....lol.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sprint has definitely come a long way, ESP in customer service considering 5 years ago they were possibly the worst. No wimax or lte in my area, but I visit friends who have wimax and love it. I will be holding out until the s4 most likely
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA
Hate you all in the OC lol. In SGV wimax is spotty as hell. You would think it would be better being a valley that has 2 million people lol..
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2
kingsway8605 said:
If you live in a Wimax area with no lte, there is no reason to upgrade. Its the reason sprint is still supporting this phone I think.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's still a great phone. They might just keep selling it until NV is fully rolled out.
Samsung will keep supporting this phone with software updates until it reaches it's end of life age of 18 months. I would hope they keep software updates coming until the 24 month mark.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
I can probably see us getting key lime prime or whatever android upgrade is coming out next. There's literally no reason we can't update if it's not a major update... If it is a major update then we'll probably get a value pack update like the OG SGS if they decide to not give us the full update.
Anyways... I've been saying this since forever but really.
If you're in a non-lte area with wimax and LTE deployment is not coming within 6 months then stick with your current wimax phones.
If you're in a wimax area or non wimax area with LTE coming within 6 months then update when you start seeing NV upgrades or increased 3g speeds (3g speeds will increase before LTE goes live) as LTE should come relatively soon as 3g speeds indicate fiber or microwave backhaul.
If you're on the fringe of Sprint service and get ****e coverage/service then switch to another carrier and come back in a year or two where sprint deploys LTE 800mhz and fills up all those holes.
Where are you guys getting your LTE timeframe estimates?
darklavalizard said:
Where are you guys getting your LTE timeframe estimates?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Being a sponsor at www.s4gru.com gives you privy to a lot of information including estimated launch dates, current progress of upgrades, location of said upgrades, and knowledge on what network vision actually is.
All markets are being shuffled thanks to the SoftBank investment in sprint. There is really no more set dates nor time frames anymore. In fact, Samsung, Alcatel-Lucent, Ericsson, and all the other vendors and subcontractors are moving all over areas regardless of market boundaries. Most work is being done in out NE, East, South, Gulf, texas & surrounding areas along with steady progress in Los Angeles (and surrounding counties) and the San Francisco Bay area.
knite75 said:
I live in Orange Country, California. There's Wimax blanketing the whole county. I love it.
Unfortunately, no LTE yet. ETA mid-next-year.
I, recently, upgraded to the S3. I tried it out for more than a week. I love the phone with all its bells and whistles. However, because there's no LTE in my area, I was connecting to the 3G. And, it's horridly SLOW.
So, I decided to switch back to my S2 Epic Touch and take advantage of the Wimax speed until LTE comes to my area.
Am I crazy? I'm wondering if anybody else have had the same experience.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm in the same boat . Love the s3 but no lte(yorba linda) got me back to my s2 and used 26GB of 4g in my bill cycle
Sent from my SPH-L710 using xda premium

Categories

Resources