I am running Genocide 0.3 with setCPU set to 1.2 Ghz and performance. I am getting scores lower than a 1.0 Ghz stock Epic with 2.2. I am getting 1113 and 2435 at 1.2 Ghz. That is definitely an improvement over stock EB13 where I was gettin 300-400 less on each. What could be slowing my Epic down?
Thanks.
kennyglass123 said:
I am running Genocide 0.3 with setCPU set to 1.2 Ghz and performance. I am getting scores lower than a 1.0 Ghz stock Epic with 2.2. I am getting 1113 and 2435 at 1.2 Ghz. That is definitely an improvement over stock EB13 where I was gettin 300-400 less on each. What could be slowing my Epic down?
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Those scores aren't really all that bad. Not great, but not bad!
If it helps any (and might make you feel better ) run Smartbench again and note the scores of the next 2 or 3 phones below your score. Run Smartbench again and see what the scores are listed at for those same phones again and you will see that they have changed.
I'm sure that Smartbench is one of the best benchmark programs out because of they way it tests, but the "comparison" output it gives leaves a lot to be desired.
In any case, scores also vary based on what things are running in the background when the test is performed. (IE: As soon as the phone is booted up, immediately after killing apps/tasks, etc.)
Edit: The way a Rom is optmized has a lot to do with it as well. What Rom are you running with the Genocide kernel?
cjobanion said:
Those scores aren't really all that bad. Not great, but not bad!
If it helps any (and might make you feel better ) run Smartbench again and note the scores of the next 2 or 3 phones below your score. Run Smartbench again and see what the scores are listed at for those same phones again and you will see that they have changed.
I'm sure that Smartbench is one of the best benchmark programs out because of they way it tests, but the "comparison" output it gives leaves a lot to be desired.
In any case, scores also vary based on what things are running in the background when the test is performed. (IE: As soon as the phone is booted up, immediately after killing apps/tasks, etc.)
Edit: The way a Rom is optmized has a lot to do with it as well. What Rom are you running with the Genocide kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dameon's stock odexed eb13.
kennyglass123 said:
I am running Genocide 0.3 with setCPU set to 1.2 Ghz and performance. I am getting scores lower than a 1.0 Ghz stock Epic with 2.2. I am getting 1113 and 2435 at 1.2 Ghz. That is definitely an improvement over stock EB13 where I was gettin 300-400 less on each. What could be slowing my Epic down?
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ext4?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
The answer to your speed desires is in my signature.
tpike said:
Ext4?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, stuck with RFS for now.
i use quadrant, its seems smartbench hates our phones..... i get crappy scores with smartbench, but with quadrant my phone roxxxxxxxx
k0nane said:
The answer to your speed desires is in my signature.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hehe...you are tempting me. K0nane, answer my new question about flashing and I'm heading your way
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
kennyglass123 said:
No, stuck with RFS for now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ext 4 made a big difference for me. why not change?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
kennyglass123 said:
I am running Genocide 0.3 with setCPU set to 1.2 Ghz and performance. I am getting scores lower than a 1.0 Ghz stock Epic with 2.2. I am getting 1113 and 2435 at 1.2 Ghz. That is definitely an improvement over stock EB13 where I was gettin 300-400 less on each. What could be slowing my Epic down?
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1390, 2930 for me on trinity 0.4 oc 1.2ghz conservative.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
tpike said:
Ext 4 made a big difference for me. why not change?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It made a big difference on Smartbench? Want to switch but keep my stock apps and TouchWiz. I had some FCs last time I tried to just convert so want to make sure to pick a ROM with as little bugs as possible.
k0nane said:
The answer to your speed desires is in my signature.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 I almost went back to the evo before I tried this rom.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
Well I jumped in to EXT 4 and Bonsai and bricked my phone, which only confirms my phone was flaky from the start. So I Odin'd the EB13 Deodexed with EXT4 and then Bonsai on top of that, restored with Titanium and VOILA, superfast! I finally beat the stock Epic and just about tie with that LG on top! Thank you all for the advice.
trying to run quadrant, phone hangs up on cpu step 10/12 every time. I know it's doing video decoding, but I feel like it shouldn't sit there for 5+ minutes...
running syndicate rom on eb13 ext4
Which SmartBench are you running? 2010 or 2011? If you're running 2011, the scores are going to be lower because he changed the baseline.
My scores on 1.2Ghz, Syndicate ROM are 949 and 2264 but significantly lower than the 2010 version which was (going from memory) around 1300 and 2900.
The way I use these benches are firstly against my own phone. The first numbers are my base and then I only compare against myself.
Secondly, you'll have to go to the website to filter the score results, but you'll compare your phone ONLY with those of the same phone.
Thirdly, once it's been established that all units are being run against the same tool, you can compare your marks against others.
Not saying my way's the only way of looking at things or that it's better; just that I do it this way.
Related
www.nena.se/nenamark/view?version=2&device_id=593
See how you compare against these scores! If you get #1, make sure to post all your info! And, by all means, feel free to brag!
OG Epic scores below to see how superior your phone is to the last GS series.
www.nena.se/nenamark/view?version=2&device_id=153
I don't understand the scoring on the website. My score is on the top
54.3fps
Sent from my Epic™ 4G Touch
globalninja said:
I don't understand the scoring on the website. My score is on the top
54.3fps
Sent from my Epic™ 4G Touch
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
YOU WIN !!!!!!!
inb4
Sorry couldn't help it
HaiKaiDo said:
inb4
Sorry couldn't help it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey look its this picture again
Sent from my Epic™ 4G Touch
HaiKaiDo said:
inb4
Sorry couldn't help it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol.
This is purely for passing the time. No need to take anything seriously.
Carry on folks!
Sent from something with a Ｋモ尺れモㄥ.
Either way this is cool, you can post whatever you want if you get top 10.
Sent from a phone with kNOw CIQ
Cleared cache and dalvik, running calkin 2.8.1 and newest rogue at 1.7ghz
natelw said:
Cleared cache and dalvik, running calkin 2.8.1 and newest rogue at 1.7ghz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1.7???? How? My phone always locks up at 1.7
sent from the near past
Danial723 said:
1.7???? How? My phone always locks up at 1.7
sent from the near past
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So does mine. He may just be one of the lucky ones.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA App
1.7 seems right on the edge... mine will run there for a little while; sometimes even long enough to get through the benchmark but it's never long before it hangs and/or reboots itself.
(Running calk 2.8.1, 75mv UV, w/ gunslinger kernel and overstew ICS btw; been considering trying OC w/ less uv to see if its more stable but since I'm usually uc'd for daily use haven't bothered yet.)
jt_hatch said:
1.7 seems right on the edge... mine will run there for a little while; sometimes even long enough to get through the benchmark but it's never long before it hangs and/or reboots itself.
(Running calk 2.8.1, 75mv UV, w/ gunslinger kernel and overstew ICS btw; been considering trying OC w/ less uv to see if its more stable but since I'm usually uc'd for daily use haven't bothered yet.)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've tried raising voltage and lowering.....freeze every time....sometimes I can get through a benchmark but not usually
sent from the near past
58.7 seems to be my mark
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA App
Oops. Fixed the link in the OP.
Sent from something with a Ｋモ尺れモㄥ.
Danial723 said:
I've tried raising voltage and lowering.....freeze every time....sometimes I can get through a benchmark but not usually
sent from the near past
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have the voltage set at 1475mV for 1704mHz on setcpu and put min and max at 1704 performance. I can run it all day no freezing but I usually run it at 200/800
See a lot of users with blazer rom, must be pretty quick?
Sent from a phone with kNOw CIQ
Eh...still rebooted at 1.7....its all good till I run quadrant it seems, anything graphic intensive
sent from the near past
I think that is pretty standard... I can run at 1704 and get through about half of my benchmarks
in my rooted room setcou and other tools shows the cpu as stock or base at 1.0ghz but will let me overclock it to 1.2 not 1.5 where it should be on stock rom it was stuck at one and on the sony ported one it will let me goto 1.6 but it get real hot and unstable at 1.5 whats the deal did we gt lied to on the cpu thats realy in the phone fior specs?
A stock Epic 4G Touch is 1.2 ghz.
It's 1.2 Dual core
thank you for some crazy reason i thought the factory specs was 1.5 but still dont explain why the os limits it to 1.0 if i didnt root it
T-Mo's is a 1.5 qualcomm, maybe that's what you were thinking of...
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Are you running any of caulks scripts.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
if ur running any custom rom with a battery saver script they most likely have it set to 1.0ghz sometimes even lower just regular usage i have it set to 800 and it runs smooth as silk ..if your not doing anything extreme you might never notice a difference by overclocking... actually im lying there is a deference the bugs that come with extreme overclocking not to mention the reduced life of your phone...but i think we're all guilty of overclocking just to do it.. and most of us just to brag about quadrant scores here's mine over clocked at 1.6 on performance with blendz rom but got really buggy
lballer69 said:
Are you running any of caulks scripts.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Very likely yes, although he may not know it.
I just wanted to let everyone know that tegrak has been updated and works with ICS on our phones now. I am currently running Codename with -75 undervolt.
It will work on stock ICS kernel.
shiftr182 said:
I just wanted to let everyone know that tegrak has been updated and works with ICS on our phones now. I am currently running Codename with -75 undervolt.
It will work on stock ICS kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup!
I posted this in the AOKP thread actually. I saw it fly past my twitter that it was updated for GalaxySII but figured it was for the international versions, or for that matter just non-sprint. But I updated it and it does indeed allow overclocking.
Yeah, pretty freaking sweet....cant wait to see how much more I can get out of the battery now.
I'll be even more excited when we have the source for the kernel. I would like to see some more governors available, such as Smartass. The three we have available, User Space, On Demand and Performance aren't really spectacular, though they do the job.
Really hell yeah i sent an email to dev about supporting ics on next update
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk
Thanks for the heads up! Now off to overclock!
Woo hop....1.42 freezes...running at 1.3 with no problems
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
1.6ghz @1475mv like a boss
Sent from a phone with kNOw CiQ k0nane...
shiftr182 said:
I just wanted to let everyone know that tegrak has been updated and works with ICS on our phones now. I am currently running Codename with -75 undervolt.
It will work on stock ICS kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you set everything to -75?
Sent from my ICS'ed out SPH-D710
neudof said:
Did you set everything to -75?
Sent from my ICS'ed out SPH-D710
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I subtracted 75mv from all of the voltages. So it is undervolted by 75mv. Definitely seeing longer battery life than yesterday, but the rom was also flashed yesterday, so it might just be settling in.
I have had numerous kernel panic lockups and spontaneous reboots trying to use tegrak at speeds and voltages that were perfectly stable on 2.3. I even tried to go a little higher on voltages. Still reboots. Think it just isn't ready for primetime yet.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Ive contacted the dev about several things Ive seen. Like when you clear dalvik cache it will hang on boot, need to pull battery. I hope Im not the only one that happens to.
Sent from a phone with kNOw CiQ k0nane...
I had is set to restore on boot, but when the phone would boot, it would lock up. I can restore after boot just fine, just not with boot.
Was running at 1400 @ 1275 mv on GB for months with no issue...For some reason the builds (calk fc15 at least) gives me no errors but it kicks it down to 800 max after awhile...I'm just using it for undervolting the cpu and gpu for now...
atlantadude1972 said:
Was running at 1400 @ 1275 mv on GB for months with no issue...For some reason the builds (calk fc15 at least) gives me no errors but it kicks it down to 800 max after awhile...I'm just using it for undervolting the cpu and gpu for now...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Calkulins roms have the battery saver script in them that controls the CPU clock. Even if you over clock on Calkulins, it will go back to whatever his script says unless his script allows the app that your using to overclock.
His script disables if it sees any other app that controls cpu.
Dicho por el E4GT de latinmaxima
I would see absolutely no need to overclock this phone, but I can definitely get behind undervolting at stock speed. Neato.
just installed and oc'd to 1.3ghz, and undervolted by -75 for each frequency. Also, somewhat weird is that no benchmark shows a second core. Does AOKP not use both cores?
transmitted via a galaxy in quadrant 2, with some ice cream.
Is anyone else having issues with calks ics rom 1.2 which is fc18 bases. I can't underclock to 800 it sticks at 1000
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
I just had another Tegrak update show up. It seems geared specifically towards the SGS2's or is this the same one and it somehow missed me?
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Is there an way someone can make a rom fast as SRF 1.2 EC05 but maybe for EL30?
Tha_Dynasty2049 said:
Is there an way someone can make a rom fast as SRF 1.2 EC05 but maybe for EL30?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Depends on what your definition of "fast" is doesn't it?
But there are lots of new roms out and kernels overclock to 1.4ghz same as genocide I believe, cm7 is very fast imo,
Sent from my SPH-D700 using xda premium
They're all "fast". Try each out and find one that fits your criteria.
Ditch the froyo already and start running some 4.0
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
b16flybye said:
Ditch the froyo already and start running some 4.0
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol yea i kno what you mean
but im running cm9 now and a red theme i kinda edit
Fire n mage said:
Depends on what your definition of "fast" is doesn't it?
But there are lots of new roms out and kernels overclock to 1.4ghz same as genocide I believe, cm7 is very fast imo,
Sent from my SPH-D700 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well beleieve it or not on 2.2 @ 1.3ghz quadrant score are 2200+
and if you flash srf 1.2 u can actually see the speed in how apps are launched
or even just transitions when holding the screen
El30 roms and cm7 are just as fast if not faster. 4.0 is a bit laggy.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
Tha_Dynasty2049 said:
Lol yea i kno what you mean
but im running cm9 now and a red theme i kinda edit
well beleieve it or not on 2.2 @ 1.3ghz quadrant score are 2200+
and if you flash srf 1.2 u can actually see the speed in how apps are launched
or even just transitions when holding the screen
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Since when do quadrant scores mean anything?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
Zeinzu said:
Since when do quadrant scores mean anything?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This. Quadrant faking was very popular during the EC05 days. The main reason you get these scores is that kernels from those time have insane EXT4 tweaks to disable not only journaling, but another form of keeping data. They also have other tweaks to make quadrant go crazy. Admittedly, I have included such tweaks in my older ROMs. I was able to achieve a quadrant score of about 5000...
On MIUI (the gingerbread version) I do not get insane faked scores but my apps open instantly and I get no lag at all... SRF is very outdated and can softbrick your phone even if the battery just falls out or you get a random reboot (due to the tweaks).
I remember the transition from froyo to gingerbread. The phone itself seemed a lot faster but the quadrant scores went down until I added the tweaks that boosted it. Seriously, do not use quadrant or any other tool to judge speed.
Zeinzu said:
Since when do quadrant scores mean anything?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
like never lol
but they was deff higher on ec05 than el30
but far visual speed to the eye i loved srf 1.2
and well for el30 i mean i like cleangb but still
if u flash srf 1.2 u will see what i mean
marcusant said:
This. Quadrant faking was very popular during the EC05 days. The main reason you get these scores is that kernels from those time have insane EXT4 tweaks to disable not only journaling, but another form of keeping data. They also have other tweaks to make quadrant go crazy. Admittedly, I have included such tweaks in my older ROMs. I was able to achieve a quadrant score of about 5000...
On MIUI (the gingerbread version) I do not get insane faked scores but my apps open instantly and I get no lag at all... SRF is very outdated and can softbrick your phone even if the battery just falls out or you get a random reboot (due to the tweaks).
I remember the transition from froyo to gingerbread. The phone itself seemed a lot faster but the quadrant scores went down until I added the tweaks that boosted it. Seriously, do not use quadrant or any other tool to judge speed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yea i understand but it does give me a type of standing
usually i go by what actually treats my phone better by test
but quadrant and linpack usually gives me a base of things thats all
and srf yes i kno has bugs but thats y i asked if it could
be maybe transffered to a certain extent maybe just speed wise
well visual speed....
We've all been on SFR and loved it at the time, but there's no reason to stay on froyo. I love ACS, don't get me wrong there.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
b16flybye said:
We've all been on SFR and loved it at the time, but there's no reason to stay on froyo. I love ACS, don't get me wrong there.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yea acs is nice but i actually was running midnight a while back
when i was out before i got to srf
but im runnign cm9 and my theme jus not really happy
and well el30 nice i guess im jus stuck with it until anpther phone.
its cool jus was wondering
Technically, the latest modem should be the same or better as the modem before it, as the code in EC05 is added on, not taken away when you see Delta Updates.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using xda premium
Hi everyone just ported over from the evo 3d. I would of thought the e4gt would have a lot of fast roms with my eco on antutu I bench just alil over 7000+. I thought the e4gt would get over 8000 if not close to 9000. but I can for some reason the best ROM I can find is just alike 7600+ and that's with it clock at 1.6. Can someone point me in the right direction? OP yea one last thing how come every ics ROM I tried has some serious low benchmarks I thought ics was going to be God compared to GB?
Cause ICS are leaks right now and overclocking is not able to be done yet. Remember benchmarks dont mean squat.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
musclehead84 said:
Cause ICS are leaks right now and overclocking is not able to be done yet. Remember benchmarks dont mean squat.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know to some people they don't mean anything but to me I due see and feel a better system and benchmarks just confirm it for me all the ics looks cool but is just a Lil to laggy for my
jay2nice000 said:
I know to some people they don't mean anything but to me I due see and feel a better system and benchmarks just confirm it for me all the ics looks cool but is just a Lil to laggy for my
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My benchmarks were all over too.. on GB, blazer 4.1 with gunslinger oc'd to 1.6g got close to 7300 in antutu, but gets 6600 in quadrant. On ICS, CM9a2 had a quadrant score of 5850 and antutu was about 6300.. (can't OC yet on ICS)
sj
Sent from my SPH-D710 sgs2e4gt on AoKPb31 FD02 AOS 4.0.4 using [email protected] 2 Beta 5
Clark el29 at 1.6
musclehead84 said:
Cause ICS are leaks right now and overclocking is not able to be done yet. Remember benchmarks dont mean squat.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ICS kernels are now overclockable with Tegrak, sir =]
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk
*Luke* said:
ICS kernels are now overclockable with Tegrak, sir =]
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried with tegrak can only go up to 1.45 and can't handle it. It can only handle 1.4 I guess I'm gonna play with voltage after my phone cools down
jay2nice000 said:
I tried with tegrak can only go up to 1.45 and can't handle it. It can only handle 1.4 I guess I'm gonna play with voltage after my phone cools down
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Using the optimization settings you should be able to get a little higher. Getting the voltage right is going to be the trick for sure.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk
*Luke* said:
Using the optimization settings you should be able to get a little higher. Getting the voltage right is going to be the trick for sure.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks for the advice but i over did it i kinda fried my gpu its ok tho i was still under 30 days at best buy. i learned my leason i will no longer overclock pass the kernel lol
fried the gpu, wow. Because Ive had mine maxed at 400mhz and voltage all the way up for hours of benchmark tests. Must of been a bad unit, or Im super lucky.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
How you have such high bench Marks ? I'm using cm9 alpha 2 also as a daily driver and once i ran a bench Mark my scores were in the 3000
Epic touch phone of xXHELLBoy91Xx
I have pulled down quadrant scores of 4100 easy running blazer 3.8 rom with stock EK02 kernel some reason my phone really like that one. I have since upgraded to 4.1 and EL29 still able to hit between 3600 to 4000. I have manage a 5550 with gunslinger at 1.6 but it was a clean install NOTHING but setcpu was added and quadrant. to be honest after all that bench marking didnt see a bit of feel diffrence only thing I noticed was how bad it hurt my batt life. I have been playing with supercharged v6 script on stock el29 blazer 4.1 for the past few days seems like it did smooth out a few things and didnt kill my battery maybe you could try that see what happens.
BTW wasnt desperado the kernel used with blazer rom that got like a 6000 not 100% on that but I think it was
pclev99 said:
I have pulled down quadrant scores of 4100 easy running blazer 3.8 rom with stock EK02 kernel some reason my phone really like that one. I have since upgraded to 4.1 and EL29 still able to hit between 3600 to 4000. I have manage a 5550 with gunslinger at 1.6 but it was a clean install NOTHING but setcpu was added and quadrant. to be honest after all that bench marking didnt see a bit of feel diffrence only thing I noticed was how bad it hurt my batt life. I have been playing with supercharged v6 script on stock el29 blazer 4.1 for the past few days seems like it did smooth out a few things and didnt kill my battery maybe you could try that see what happens.
BTW wasnt desperado the kernel used with blazer rom that got like a 6000 not 100% on that but I think it was
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
im not to sure but calkulin rom is better. for some odd reason i couldnt Oc blazers rom but i ran it stock vs calk el29 stock and calk won. though there was another rom that was ics and did beat calks rom but thats when my gpu friend and im gonna try to find it again. it did beat claks stock Non Oc by like 400 points. i know if i could find it again and try messing around with the Oc i could get real close to 8000 benchmark we will see what happens
az18zz said:
How you have such high bench Marks ? I'm using cm9 alpha 2 also as a daily driver and once i ran a bench Mark my scores were in the 3000
Epic touch phone of xXHELLBoy91Xx
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In my eyes i think GB is faster than ics i used Calkulin's E4GT v3.0 EL29 Oc to 1.6gz. i have tested over the top roms and nothing comes close i have even Oc to 2.00 with other roms and still doesnt beat this rom. though other rom due look better.
TeamERA said:
fried the gpu, wow. Because Ive had mine maxed at 400mhz and voltage all the way up for hours of benchmark tests. Must of been a bad unit, or Im super lucky.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i think your lucky because everytime i pushed 400 i would only get 10 seconds at best before either it froze or turn my screen green would have to wait till it cooled off to trying messing with it again but thats what i got insurance for