[Q] problems to OC the new kernel?? - Desire HD Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting

hey guys,
my question is, what held the developers of OC the new kernel? is it a new security? or??

NoEnd said:
hey guys,
my question is, what held the developers of OC the new kernel? is it a new security? or??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No its nothing awful like that, its just simply that HTC have yet to release the source code for the new Kernel. As soon as they do we can start messing with it!
Until then there isnt a practical way of customising the kernel.

Related

[Q] Installing SetCPU on Gingerbread

Installing SetCPU or any other CPU frequency tuning related program on 2.3.x? Is there any point to it? Since custom kernels for Gingerbread dont exist?
You can change the governors (ondemand, performance, userspace) and max/min clock rate I believe, but overclocking is impossible without a custome kernel.
Morality said:
Since custom kernels for Gingerbread dont exist?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Who told you that? Have a look at the Android Development forum.
Mr_JMM said:
Who told you that? Have a look at the Android Development forum.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I believe he is talking about custom kernels for Sense ROMs. Kernels for AOSP do exist of course.
frosty_ice said:
I believe he is talking about custom kernels for Sense ROMs. Kernels for AOSP do exist of course.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What? Jeez, I've missed something very obvious here. Thank you for your answers though.
EDIT: Thank you very much for this info, my decision to try out Cyanogenmod just got justified Boy is my face red
cm7 obviously also has the CPU controls under it's settings so you may still not necessarily want to use setCPU.
I do anyway tho
Mr_JMM said:
Who told you that? Have a look at the Android Development forum.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i think the same that mr-jmm have a look at the development forum... there are custom kernels designeds in a first place for froyo but works perfect in gingerbread.. some buzz kernels and leedroid 2.2.x

Which ROM + kernel is the best for performance? [GSM]

Hey everyone,
I've been running AOKP + franco's kernel for quite some time now, and it is pretty amazing if I do say so myself . I wanted some change though, and I was wondering in what other GSM ROM have you guys had the best experience in?
there are multiple threads with this discussion, use the search feature please.
the best experience is simply... already what you're using, but if you really want change.. probably bigxie is what you want.

[Q] ROM Development and AOSP Development overlap?

Pardon the noobish question, but with the release of AOSP Sources for 4.0.4, I'm wondering: How much duplication goes on between ROM devs and AOSP devs?
When ROM devs and Kernel devs are tweaking kernels, are they fixing and optimizing the same things as AOSP devs? Or are they more often working on two different sides of the code, and fixes from one side advance the state of the art for the other?
Another way to put this: Right now, I'm using a custom kernel. Is it likely that a 4.0.4-based custom kernel will actually offer improvements over the current 4.0.3-based version of the same dev's kernel? Or have devs already made most of the tweaks that the AOSP devs did, resulting in a very modest improvement.
I'm just trying to temper my excitement a bit. I know that 4.0.4 would likely be huge coming from stock 4.0.2, but if the ROM devs are already well ahead of the AOSP folks, I won't expect 4.0.4 Gummy to be that different than 4.0.3 Gummy (for instance).
The devs merge the new code and stay current. They keep their tweaks too etc.
RogerPodacter said:
The devs merge the new code and stay current. They keep their tweaks too etc.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I understand, but I'm wondering how often the Dev tweaks ARE the new changes in a new AOSP release.
wanderfowl said:
I understand, but I'm wondering how often the Dev tweaks ARE the new changes in a new AOSP release.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats pretty rare, though may happen once in a while. Mostly the devs work on new features code and additions. I'll try to think of an example and post if it comes to me.
RogerPodacter said:
Thats pretty rare, though may happen once in a while. Mostly the devs work on new features code and additions. I'll try to think of an example and post if it comes to me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The only one I can think of is the swyping of the notifications
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

[Q] Anyone had luck getting current kangaroo kernel (R21) to boot with ANY rom?

Hey Everyone,
Recently I've been trying like heck to get any ICS/sense based ROM to boot with the current available kangarookernels (r19.1 and r21) and I've had no luck. I know there are other decent sense kernels out there but my primary interest is in fauxsound. I have a fascinate (galaxy s) here that I use for a music player and because of the voodoo hardware and kernel it blows basically any other phone I've come across out of the water in terms of headset output. Otherwise, do you guys know of any other AOSP/sense based kernels that incorporate fauxsound for our device. Thank you very much for reading and I look forward to any input that's out there.
baischillin said:
Hey Everyone,
Recently I've been trying like heck to get any ICS/sense based ROM to boot with the current available kangarookernels (r19.1 and r21) and I've had no luck. I know there are other decent sense kernels out there but my primary interest is in fauxsound. I have a fascinate (galaxy s) here that I use for a music player and because of the voodoo hardware and kernel it blows basically any other phone I've come across out of the water in terms of headset output. Otherwise, do you guys know of any other AOSP/sense based kernels that incorporate fauxsound for our device. Thank you very much for reading and I look forward to any input that's out there.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
-Should have mentioned that I'm S-OFF, currently running viperinc with havesense kernel. always follow the proper format for flashing and i'm havning no issues with the current combo. also i've used the antivenom script and it unfortunately did not help.
Build your own kernel?
It would allow you to have any configuration of options...
Sent from my ADR6350 using Tapatalk
Thank you for the vote of confidence....but I'm not savvy enough with the programming language to build a kernel. I looked into adding kernel patches and tried getting a general feel for the Linux language....and I still don't know what a GIT is. I have a lot of respect for you folks out there who can make it happen but I'm not one of them.

[Q] Is someone developing a over clock able kernel?

Hi
I was wondering if anyone is currently developing a kernel for stock ROM that allows overclocking. I think the gpu at least could use some overclocking.
Thanks in advance.
P. S. Sorry for the title, autocorrection's fault.

Categories

Resources