Which one do you like better? I'm not necessarily looking for best over clock speed, but actually better battery life. Any ideas?
I prefer kings kernels.. I haven't had good results on nets kernels lately.. cpu stayed at 100% a lot for me..
Kings scales just fine for me and provides great battery life.. I use his bfs #4 kernel.
Sent from my HTC Evo 4G using XDA app.
I've used nearly every one of netarchy's kernels, but am now using King's. My battery life is awesome on BFS #4, and everything is very smooth.
I actually prefer hero's baked snack kernel 1. It also has HAVS like king's kernel. Standby time battery life is about the same between king's and hero's, but for me hero's battery life is better when actively using the phone.
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
Stupid question, but what is the difference between BFS and CFS kernels?
I guess a better question is BFS #4 or CFS #7?
bigupurself7 said:
Stupid question, but what is the difference between BFS and CFS kernels?
I guess a better question is BFS #4 or CFS #7?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
exactly my thoughts.. which is better?
WutTheHeezy said:
exactly my thoughts.. which is better?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Google is your friend. But basically, BFS is supposed to be faster, while a little less stable, while CFS is supposed to be a little more stable (its older), but the trade off is the speed. I personally dont see much of a speed difference, but I still usually use BFS.
netarchy. Never had any problems with his kernels. Haven't tried King's yet, but the way I look at is, if it ain't broke don't fix it.
Sent from my FROYO'D EVO using xda app
Kings
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
running net's kernel atm, but most likely going to switch. 4g doesn't seem to work for me, and it keeps saying there is a voicemail update, but won't actually let me install it.
I'm sure KingxKlick is a great guy and knows what he's doing, but I avoid his kernel because he doesn't actually own an Evo. I stick with netarchy because he's someone I trust.
Last-Chance said:
running net's kernel atm, but most likely going to switch. 4g doesn't seem to work for me, and it keeps saying there is a voicemail update, but won't actually let me install it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unistall voicemail from Titanium backup. Then go here http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=7749762&postcount=44 That is the updated Apk for the voicemail. Hope that helps man. And for me I use Kingz and love it. Been getting some very good battery life out of it. And its smooth even when running @ 1.17 oc.
Last-Chance said:
running net's kernel atm, but most likely going to switch. 4g doesn't seem to work for me, and it keeps saying there is a voicemail update, but won't actually let me install it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you have the latest radios?
The voicemail update (or lack of update, rather) is a ROM issue. It affects Fresh and others. More info and fix here.
sturmen said:
Do you have the latest radios?
The voicemail update (or lack of update, rather) is a ROM issue. It affects Fresh and others. More info and fix here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hmm, thats weird. I didn't have the problem before i flashed it with the kernel. any info on the 4g issue? if thats rom as well, then netarchy kernel is fine.
edit: just did a quick flash of king's kernel. seems like the 4g issue is rom issue as well.
Kings has been amazing so far, i'm very satisfied!
I have used both and get better battery out of kings by a large margin. I am using the BFS #4 and couldn't be happier. I had the 100% CPU issue on nets last update.
Here is a simple thing for me: When I am running Kings, my phone seems cooler to the touch, no matter what I'm doing. On nets, it get warm, then cools, then warm. Heat is wasted energy.
I think lots of the meat and cheese in Kings kernel came from net anyhow, but I no longer has a need to flash a new kernel. Sticking with kings.
-Roger
Like said above, if it isn't broke, I don't fix it. I'm using Netarchy's 4.18 and I'm not having the 100% cpu issue at all
Ok, figured I'd contradict myself and flash king's #4 bfs and test benchmarks against net's 4.1.8 bfs. Here are my results:
Fresh 3.1.0.2 / novatec 0003 / setcpu @ 1152 performance
fps2d:
net's - 54/2.69 attempt 2 of 3
king's - 54/1.84 attempt 3 of 3
linpack:
net's - 37.029 attempt 4 of 5
king's - 37.661 attempt 4 of 5
Nena Mark: Only ran once
net's - 15.7
king's - 15.5
Neocore: Only ran once
net's - 31.4
king's - 31.7
Quadrant:
net's - 1496 attempt 1 of 2
king's - 1513 attempt 2 of 2
Looks like king won this round. Gonna keep running it to see what battery life is like.
Netarchy 4.1.8. Maybe I'll try King's....but Netarchy is always on the ball. My battery is at 26.0 C on Net's and I've been surfing the web.
Will be using net's. It's like Kobe v LeBron
MedSchool26 said:
Netarchy 4.1.8. Maybe I'll try King's....but Netarchy is always on the ball. My battery is at 26.0 C on Net's and I've been surfing the web.
Will be using net's. It's like Kobe v LeBron
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol or Ford vs. Chevy
Related
ok well im running the stock rom and JT_Rom beta 2.0 and im testing out other
ROMs such as calkulins evio 2 and others.
but is kingxkernel bfs 4? the best?
i need something really good. overclock?
i want to have the best battery life.
how can i do this?
yes
i would likke to know the sam ething
I am running CM6 and would like to use the best battery saving kernel!!
I am having great results with King's #11 CFS
Really good battery life? I'm just starting to use kings CFS #9.
Sent From My HTC EVO
King's #11 CFS has been running fantastic for me. I am using the Azarel v2.3 ROM with it. Strangely enough, the first time I loaded Kings with Azarel, the phone was super laggy. I gave it a reboot or two and now it rocks. I have never had good battery life, even with stock 3.29 or other ROMs and kernels. I could make it throughout the day with moderate use and have about 15% left. I have been unplugged today for six hours and have 80% left with slightly less than moderate use... Slow day.
I'm also on radio 2.15.00.09.01 and PRI 1.34 on a HW rev. 003 EVO. The 1.77 PRI dropped my signal strength here in Ocala, FL.
Of course, make sure you wipe your cache/dalvik before you flash the new kernel.
Hope this helps!
Yeah,i did so. How long til the battery life shows progress. This is the first kernel I'm testing. Kings cfs#9. How can I calibrate the battery ? I wiped the battery stats to make it better to .
Sent From My HTC EVO
Perf Test
Since battery life seems to be the biggest gripe, It would be nice to have some type of non-biased performance test / graphs for some of the ROMS and kernels.
The Common misconceptions and other useful information... post at the top of this sub-forum has great information, including manners to calibrate your battery.
The problem with testing ROMs and kernels is that everyone's phone is slightly different. Some can't over/underclock to the same degree as others' phones. Sometimes a particular kernel will cause your EVO to force close applications or have other strange problems such as rebooting.
If you search the forums, you will see that there was one person in particular that did a graph of performance testing with various ROMs and kernels.
My advice would be, if you are confident enough, to go ahead and test each of the "leading" ROMs and kernels and see which one works best for you. You can also refer to the Wiki which has ROM/kernel information available.
I wanna know how if it works best for you. I wouldn't know what to test.
Sent From My HTC EVO
Caspers25 said:
I wanna know how if it works best for you. I wouldn't know what to test.
Sent From My HTC EVO
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Flash ROM.Flash kernel. Use a few days. Note battery life. Repeat.
Those are definitely the best steps. Personally the new 3.3 ROMs kernel is supposed to be awesome for battery. I like the Azarel and myn ROMs and have had good luck with Kings #11 and netarchy's kernels. Your mileage WILL vary which is why you should do your own testing.
bender1077 said:
Flash ROM.Flash kernel. Use a few days. Note battery life. Repeat.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which netarchy kernel do you use? Link please.
Sent From My HTC EVO
When do you start to see change I'm barry life from the kernel? How long til it kicks in?
Sent From My HTC EVO
ryedunn said:
Since battery life seems to be the biggest gripe, It would be nice to have some type of non-biased performance test / graphs for some of the ROMS and kernels.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://ip208-100-42-21.static.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=790559
battery life is priority for me. kings #6 bfs and baked snack 6 are my favorite kernels.
quocamole said:
http://ip208-100-42-21.static.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=790559
battery life is priority for me. kings #6 bfs and baked snack 6 are my favorite kernels.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow thank you! What's baked snack 6 url?
Sent From My HTC EVO
Hey all,
I just flashed Sprint Lover's ROM and I was wondering what is the best Kernal for this Sense ROM? I really like the stock look, but I would love to improve some performance under the hood.
Any help would be great!
Thank you very much!!!
Gianni
mgianni19 said:
Hey all,
I just flashed Sprint Lover's ROM and I was wondering what is the best Kernal for this Sense ROM? I really like the stock look, but I would love to improve some performance under the hood.
Any help would be great!
Thank you very much!!!
Gianni
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I always use Netarchy's kernel, but what may be good on one phone may also be bad on another phone. I suggest flashing different kernels and testing them out.
EVO on Tapatalk
piscesjoey said:
I always use Netarchy's kernel, but what may be good on one phone may also be bad on another phone. I suggest flashing different kernels and testing them out.
EVO on Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you have a link for that Kernal? Would love to test it out.
mgianni19 said:
Do you have a link for that Kernal? Would love to test it out.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Go Here for his kernels. I use Netarchy Toastmod - 4.3-cfs-havs-more-sbc and so far it's worked amazing on the various ROMs I've used (including Sprint Lovers) but it's worked best for me on Myn's ROMs.
PryorDaniel said:
Go Here for his kernels. I use Netarchy Toastmod - 4.3-cfs-havs-more-sbc and so far it's worked amazing on the various ROMs I've used (including Sprint Lovers) but it's worked best for me on Myn's ROMs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think I'm gonna flash this kernel tomorrow, but maybe the nosbc so I don't fry my battery... Have you had any issues with the battery with the sbc? And do you use SetCpu with the kernel?
nck4857 said:
I think I'm gonna flash this kernel tomorrow, but maybe the nosbc so I don't fry my battery... Have you had any issues with the battery with the sbc? And do you use SetCpu with the kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, and no
Don't use SetCPU with a havs kernel. If you go with one of his nohavs kernels then by all means use SetCPU as you wish. Another thing, just from my personal experience (though it may be different for your phone) the CFS kernels work far better than the BFS kernels. There's a guide around here that explains the difference.
As far as SBC goes, I haven't had any issues yet. I've been using a battery monitor to watch what's going on with my battery and haven't seen anything wrong with it. Another thing I do, just as a small precaution, is not let the phone charge 6-8 hours over-night. I'll let it charge to 100% then let it sit for about 2-3 more hours and call it quits. Don't know if that really does anything, but it makes me feel better so eh.
I know the military (I'm in the Army) uses Lit-ion batteries and trickle charges them without having any of them blow up/fry, however they do lose their ability to hold a charge over time. The fact that they do it, and the only problem has been lifespan of the battery is what convinced me to try an SBC kernel. Just choose whichever you feel comfortable with. It's all preference really.
PryorDaniel said:
Go Here for his kernels. I use Netarchy Toastmod - 4.3-cfs-havs-more-sbc and so far it's worked amazing on the various ROMs I've used (including Sprint Lovers) but it's worked best for me on Myn's ROMs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Netarchy Toastmod - 4.3-cfs-havs-more-sbc is the best from my personal experieince...good battery life and makes choppy roms run a lot more smoothly
nck4857 said:
I think I'm gonna flash this kernel tomorrow, but maybe the nosbc so I don't fry my battery... Have you had any issues with the battery with the sbc? And do you use SetCpu with the kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've been using that one with no-sbc and it's worked great with the conservative profile. HAVS just deals with what voltage the processor uses at any given time/frequency so you can indeed use setcpu with it. It's the kernels with the built in smartass governor or ROMs using other battery tweaking scripts that don't always work well with setcpu.
And trust me, the military does not trickle charge their li-ions and they only run them at 4.10 volts to extend their life (depending on battery, always less than volts than their commercial counterparts). This I know for certain.
Anyone have a link to the stock kernel
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
Guys quick question, with the above mentioned kernel. What frequency does if use when you turn off the screen? I want if to use the lowest possible, does the kernel do it automatically or should I use something like the overlook widget?
Also, can someone please provide instructions how to update the kernel, I haven't looked at the link yet so If there's instructions there that fine.
Thanks
wifi errors
i just flashed to netarchy kernel to my evo. cfs, havs no sbc. when i try to connect to wifi it says error. i used kernal manager to flash the kernal. is there anything i can to do to get the wifi back or do i need to go back to the stock kernel. i am running sprint lovers ROM. any suggestions.
update. when i flashed manually everything worked fine. maybe the kernel manager program has an issue with wiping the cache. not really sure. just thought i should let everyone know.
I would use the stock #15 HTC Kernel but with SBC. Link is in sec post here..
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=876590
I've been using netarchy 4.3.4 cfs more havs aggressive sbc with no problems. Amazing battery life and very responsive.
Netarchy's kernels are very stable,if you're up for it try a sbc kernel,great battery life.
sbc
i was just reluctant to try an sbc because of the horror stories i have heard about frying the battery. i guess when i feel lucky i will try it.
What you guys think for best battery life no sbc kernel bad for battery looking for a good kernel to run with elite 3 and virus airborne beta. Been using net kernel latest no cfs no sbc no suv bfs did try one ziggy kernel on older 5.4 airborne Rom.thanks finally figured out how to get sense running on airborne beta .
reaper24 said:
What you guys think for best battery life no sbc kernel bad for battery looking for a good kernel to run with elite 3 and virus airborne beta. Been using net kernel latest no cfs no sbc no suv bfs did try one ziggy kernel on older 5.4 airborne Rom.thanks finally figured out how to get sense running on airborne beta .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
HERE you can compare kernels. But i personally like a kernel that more aggressive. Netarchys Kernels & Ziggy's Kernels
You will have to experiment on your own and see what works best for you. Every phone reacts differently to kernels.
Personally, I have the best luck with Netarchy kernels. Ziggy kernels are completely unstable for me to the point where my system freezes up and I have to pull the battery.
Sent from my HTC EVO 4G with Tapatalk
kd0axs said:
You will have to experiment on your own and see what works best for you. Every phone reacts differently to kernels.
Personally, I have the best luck with Netarchy kernels. Ziggy kernels are completely unstable for me to the point where my system freezes up and I have to pull the battery.
Sent from my HTC EVO 4G with Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which is better net cfs havs more no sbc or all no with cfs
reaper24 said:
Which is better net cfs havs more no sbc or all no with cfs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Personally bfs doesnt play well with my phone so stay with cfs. try each for a day and compare notes.
kd0axs said:
You will have to experiment on your own and see what works best for you. Every phone reacts differently to kernels.
Personally, I have the best luck with Netarchy kernels. Ziggy kernels are completely unstable for me to the point where my system freezes up and I have to pull the battery.
Sent from my HTC EVO 4G with Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im using the net more havs hope it doesn't hurt my phone . Thanks what Rom u using . I'm on airborne
ive tried all kinda kernels, nets and ziggys in my opinion are the best. right now im using nets newest 4.3.4-cfs-havs-more-sbc (More Aggressive HAVS) i get Really good battery life and evrything seems to mesh well. but from what ive been reading not all kernels work the same for different phones.
Something is wrong...
steal25 said:
ive tried all kinda kernels, nets and ziggys in my opinion are the best. right now im using nets newest 4.3.4-cfs-havs-more-sbc (More Aggressive HAVS) i get Really good battery life and evrything seems to mesh well. but from what ive been reading not all kernels work the same for different phones.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Got onto the Elite 3 ROM the other day and LOVE it! However, its absolutely chewing through my battery life (extended batteries). Went from getting at very least 12 hours on MikFroyo 4.5 & stock kernel to now sitting at 63% after 3 hours! Was using Juice Defender for a bit until this kernel. lots of people said not to with havs.
Using Nets 4.3.4 cfs nosbc haves more with Konis Elite Series 3.
Have also got Setcpu running at smartass (also tried on demand) st 245/740ish and have one screen off profile set to 245/245 powersave.
Need to find a fix because I want to stay on this ROM.
Just a show of hands basically, because both of these guys keep updating their kernels back to back it seems.
I personally use tiamat 3.3.3, these kernels have been good on my battery, and are pretty fast.
Which do you prefer?
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA Premium App
-Raises hand for Tiamat-
phonetec said:
Just a show of hands basically, because both of these guys keep updating their kernels back to back it seems.
I personally use tiamat 3.3.3, these kernels have been good on my battery, and are pretty fast.
Which do you prefer?
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree Tiamat has been awesome for me...i had too much chopiness with salvaged-zen and i personally like the SBC addition to kernels and they stopped updating it with SBC i saw...but as far as battery life and smoothness goes, i choose Tiamat, hands down.
Tiamat is great, but there is something up with bluetooth audio in his kernels. It's like the audio doesn't use the mic to auto cancel sound or something. Can't really put my finger on it. All I know is that when talking to the fiance after work on the way home in the car on yesterday, all she heard was road noise. Switched back to SZ and today its gone. Gonna wait a couple of revisions and try it again
teh roxxorz said:
-Raises hand for Tiamat-
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
MEGA dot. 3.3.3 ia ftw
Sent from HTC EVO
Savaged Zen here. I tried Tiamat for a while, but I kept getting random reboots no matter what I tried. The first SZ I used was .9 bfs havs, and it worked great. Currently on .1.2 cfs and no problems.
Savaged Zen All the way. Especially now (this is from march) the 2.6.38 line, im on the newest 2.0.2 and Its super smooth, I havent seen the slightest hint of any instability, and it rips on benchmarks and games
Any Tiamat kernel sends me into random soft reboots, almost once every half hour or so. I can get it to stop by flashing ViperBoy's raise voltage script. Then it runs quite smooth and stable, however battery life sucks for me (probably from raising voltage) Savaged Zen gets my vote, it just agrees with my device way better for some reason, especially 2.0 CFS.
SavagedZen works better for me than Tiamat. Had them both and both worked well but I like running BFS on my phone and the SavagedZen governor is a great governor for battery life and performance.
timat is really stable on my phone, but sz has always been much faster... now that he new sz fixed my problems, im staying with it
I'm a fan of savaged but I'm cool with tiamat, still looking for a happy home. Im on SZ 2.0.2 which is giving me good battery life but still has the BS wimax bug. I ran tiamat a couple weeks ago for a few days but I swapped out once the random reboots started. Wish CM7, one of the best roms, also came with the best kernel.
Sent from the moon, Alice says hi.
I know I'm noobish so I apologize in advance if this question is dumb.
My phone is rooted and has sprintlovers 2.2 ROM, I wanted HDMI to work on my phone as it didn't with stock kernel so I tried netarchys newest offering something like 4.3.4 no HAVS no static UV. This kernel hated my phone. It was very slow both in feeling and in benchmark testing.
Then I downloaded teamwins offering for HDMI acceleration something along the lines of poonsense. This works great on my phone and also now hdmi app works.
Kernel I have now is listed as [email protected] # 17
What I want is the kernel I have now with the ability to overclock. I use the 1-1-1 Power Management System (see signature) so my phone is never on the charger and I don't need extra battery life so I'm more concerned with performance but would prefer if battery life was only minimally affected.
Anyone have any suggestions on a sense kernel that is near stock but has HDMI acceleration support and overclocking both in one? I looked around but was not having luck. Thanks- Brandon
Not exactly sure, but you can try the savaged-zen kernels.
I do believe the savagezen kernels are only for aosp; ive actually used this netarchy CFS NO-sbc Have LESS with HDMI and it works nice. Some phones don't like the kernels with aggressive havs or undervolting. If youre having battery issues you might want to downgrade your prl and nv from 1.90 to 1.77.
http://qap.la/~netarchy/netarchy-toastmod-4.3.4-cfs-havs-less-nosbc-universal-signed.zip
dirkyd3rk said:
I do believe the savagezen kernels are only for aosp; ive actually used this netarchy CFS NO-sbc Have LESS with HDMI and it works nice. Some phones don't like the kernels with aggressive havs or undervolting.
http://qap.la/~netarchy/netarchy-toastmod-4.3.4-cfs-havs-less-nosbc-universal-signed.zip
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ah yes, that is true. Good catch.
dirkyd3rk said:
I do believe the savagezen kernels are only for aosp; ive actually used this netarchy CFS NO-sbc Have LESS with HDMI and it works nice. Some phones don't like the kernels with aggressive havs or undervolting. If youre having battery issues you might want to downgrade your prl and nv from 1.90 to 1.77.
http://qap.la/~netarchy/netarchy-toastmod-4.3.4-cfs-havs-less-nosbc-universal-signed.zip
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for all the replies.
I am not having battery issues to my knowledge.
The netarchy kernel I tried had neither havs or undervolting, it was the standard 4.3.4 kernel and it ran very badly. Unless it is possible to get a bad flash I think its not so compatible with my phone which is why I want the kernel I have now or something similar but with overclock option.
Anyone else have any suggestions? Is it *reasonably* possible that I got a bad file or flash of the netarchy beta? If so I may try it again as it has both features I want.
Did you flash 4.3.4 CFS or BFS? If you flashed CFS, try re-downloading it and re-flashing. If that doesn't work, try BFS. If you flashed BFS, I would still try downloading and flashing CFS and flashing that.
jstalford said:
Did you flash 4.3.4 CFS or BFS? If you flashed CFS, try re-downloading it and re-flashing. If that doesn't work, try BFS. If you flashed BFS, I would still try downloading and flashing CFS and flashing that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unfortunately there is not a 4.3.4 netarchy kernel yet that is BFS, there is just CFS at this time. I may try to redownload it but I have to be honest I have a feeling I will get the same results I guess if there is a chance there isnt much to lose right?
I actually thought about that, but was too lazy to check if there was a BFS or not. but, I have had bad downloads before. Strange that your phone doesn't like that kernel though, dont here that too often.
jstalford said:
I actually thought about that, but was too lazy to check if there was a BFS or not. but, I have had bad downloads before. Strange that your phone doesn't like that kernel though, dont here that too often.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just flashed the netarchy kernel earlier today and it works great now. Must have been a bad download or flash???
Anyhow, I'm happy now I will probably try the HAVS versions now.