Hey
Is there a ROM for Trinity / P3600 with Manilla 3D?
Guess that it would be impossible to have M3D on Trinity...
Trinity doesn't have a processor capable of that (as far as I know...)
On the other hand it requires too much memory to run. Trinity only have 64 MB of RAM.
Related
Specification wise, the Kaiser seems to be a Trinity with keyboard and WM6. Would a Kaiser ROM dump be useful in creating an "official" P3600 WM6 ROM or is the keyboard a show stopper?
I think since the Kaiser uses a different Qualcomm chipset you'd have driver issues....
Kaisar is completly different - As one major difference
Kaosar runs a qulacomm processor and trinity runs a samsung one
I noticed the different processor. I've got to stop thinking PC where the processor doesn't matter if it's designed to operate Windows.
No every processor had a different way of operating. Like TI OMAP etc.
Also the Trinity has 128/64 while the Kaiser has 128/256.
Hello guys, I bought my HTC P3300 more than two years ago, but I still apreciate it a lot and I don't wanna change with a new model now!
Nevertheless I would like to update the ROM since I'm basically tired of the graphic, of the need of the "pen" for almost all the operations, which the official wm6 rom offers.
But I'm a totally newbie in mount cooked roms, and also in the choice of which one could be good for my needs!
I read a bit around, to understand what was the most suitable coocked ROM, but i get very confused.
As far as I understand, when a ROM claims "Manila 2D" means that the interface is "diamond" style but lighter (needed since the 200MHz cpu of the artemis with respcet to the >500MHz of the diamond) due to the 2D instead of the 3D graphic. Is it true?
If is it like this, I would like to have some suggestion for a manila 2D good rom, since I would like to have a diamond style GUI on my artemis.
PS: I will not go to update rom every months, I think I will mount one up to the end of the days of my artemis, so I would like to have some suggestion of some ROM as much stable and fast as possible, is not important that has no last version of the programs mounted on it etc...
Thank you in advance for the suggestions,
Bye,
Dins.
hey
well about the manila 2D right our artemis can't handle 3D cuz of the CPU, RAM & graphics (as i know)
it's been long time ago since i used manila cuz it eat much RAM for me so i prefer a clean rom while u will don't need the stylus too in it
anyway the best one i used with manila is the Flyrom (search for it) but newer builds i don't know about them with the manila
WM 6.5 looks great! but is it faster than 6.1? I'm currently using Schap's WM6.1 and looking forwarding to an OS upgrade if it provides better speed performance. In addition, which ROM will provide a minimum of 20mb program after load. Thank you for the input
ive used the 6.1 roms for a long time decided to change to a 6.5 rom but i had problems with it such as memory shortage and i didnt like a lot of programs on it. i didnt find it any quicker so have changed back to a 6.1 rom which i prefer. as for choosing a good rom your going to have to flash and look through lots of different roms to find one you like or cook one your self.
Have fun
The core of the 6.5 system is faster than of 6.1 - the problem is how many of those various additions are cooked in. If too many, or badly cooked ROM - as a whole it's slower - but if unnecessary things are removed it's a faster system. The RAM is more problematic - it needs more of it, but after removing some elements and reediting others you can get 25 to even 29 MB of free RAM on 6.5
WM6.5 vs 6
damikey said:
WM 6.5 looks great! but is it faster than 6.1? I'm currently using Schap's WM6.1 and looking forwarding to an OS upgrade if it provides better speed performance. In addition, which ROM will provide a minimum of 20mb program after load. Thank you for the input
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As far as i understand Schaps 4.31 is based on WM version 6 not 6.1 so damikey question should be restated. I havent tried 6.5, maybe when becomes official, so cant answer your question, but I have read in this forum that version 6 core is faster than 6.1... WM6.5 vs 6
HTC Tytn
SuperCID
SPL: 2.10.Olipro (HardSPL v7)
ROM: Shamanix WM6 Ultimate v2 Final
RADIO: 1.48.00.10
chicochico said:
I have read in this forum that version 6 core is faster than 6.1... WM6.5 vs 6
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No! Absolutely not.
WM6.1 is the most fast and responsive ROM right now, while WM5 was the worst one. WM6 was way better than WM5, but it's slower and less stable than 6.1.
Wm6.5? It depends, as I said before... its core is faster than 6.1 - but UI is just bigger and more resources-hungry.
utak3r said:
No! Absolutely not.
WM6.1 is the most fast and responsive ROM right now, while WM5 was the worst one. WM6 was way better than WM5, but it's slower and less stable than 6.1.
Wm6.5? It depends, as I said before... its core is faster than 6.1 - but UI is just bigger and more resources-hungry.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you think using that dll in dev and hacking forum we can increase the speed? maybe with that... we could edit all the icons in dlls and Theme to make it faster than the hell... but i cant figured out how to use it... cause we must to sacrifice a little megabytes of storage.
utak3r rigth...didnt know that, thanks. I have read months ago about unstability problems in 6.1 but maybe the threads were just outdated or google trick me into thinking that. I havent tried myself, just know rigth now about WM5 and 6. So I which a lite stripped down version of 6.5 even without Titanium if were possible just with honey like programs menu to make trials and see how it feels in day to day use and not only by benchmark results... something like that exists rigth now or is in development?
Maybe you or +Que PPC or other chef can do it !!!!!????? would be awesome
HTC Tytn
SuperCID
SPL: 2.10.Olipro (HardSPL v7)
ROM: Shamanix WM6 Ultimate v2 Final
RADIO: 1.48.00.10
utak3r said:
No! Absolutely not.
WM6.1 is the most fast and responsive ROM right now, ...WM6 was way better than WM5, but it's slower and less stable than 6.1.
...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Still with doubts I did a quick search and the thread wasnt that old. Here http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=496318 some people disagree with the fact that 6.1 is faster. I saw the benchmarks for hermes (dont have the link rigth now) for different cooked ROMs and results were similar between WM6 and 6.1 with the same pagepool.
IMHO maybe as you say the 6.1 CORE could be faster (!?) but some other issues (like only 64mb RAM in Hermes) could make some people FEEL like its slower with their configurations and stick to WM6 or make a jump al the way to 6.5. Its just a thought. damikey only concern is performance and memory in his post, because he have Schaps which is a very stable ROM IMO, but stability, now that you mentioned it, would be another issue (not offtopic). I know you have lot of more experience than me and as I have the same doubt as damikey would be interesting to know about this a little more. I need my tytn as a phone so dont want to flash every week. Thanks again.
HTC Tytn
SuperCID
SPL: 2.10.Olipro (HardSPL v7)
ROM: Shamanix WM6 Ultimate v2 Final
RADIO: 1.48.00.10
Hi again after resolving the internet connection issue now I have a rookie question!
After looking at different threads I am a bit confused about the touchflo 3d
Wish version is more stable with or without manila? how easy is to change it?
Im downloading rhodium v33.021310
I think Manila is a personal choice. I don't care for it myself. Too much of a resource hog (in my opinion). I just use the titanium interface.
If I had a HD2, then for me it wouldn't be a big deal. 500mhz processor vs 1ghz processor
2.5 2011 is meant for the 512 proc. there is no 2.6, it named a build a while back but the latest versions of manila are called 2.5. i think its too great not to have.
Well after downloading a udk leo r7 rom version when trying to update I keep getting erro 262 Am I missing something? my phone is sync with my pc
since i flash a wm6.5 rom, my artemis runs cool with 273Mhz overclocked with hs++
the next step is 286mhz but this freezes the artemis after a while.
can i change the steps in hs++ lower than 13mhz?
and is here any other artemis run with this speed?
sorry for my english....
ralf