i need ROM WM5 stable one.. anybody help me
Yes. The latest factory rom is the T-Mobile AKU 3.3 one from September this year. Problem is it looked very nasty as in keeping with T-Mobile's adapted colours (Pink and charcoal... YUK). I have changed those back to factory and used the O2 dialer skin (much nicer) and left the rest of the rom untouched.
Give it a try. I have been using it for a month now without problems.
This is the link to the post with the download
regards,
Psi
PsiDOC said:
Yes. The latest factory rom is the T-Mobile AKU 3.3 one from September this year. Problem is it looked very nasty as in keeping with T-Mobile's adapted colours (Pink and charcoal... YUK). I have changed those back to factory and used the O2 dialer skin (much nicer) and left the rest of the rom untouched.
Give it a try. I have been using it for a month now without problems.
This is the link to the post with the download
regards,
Psi
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Very thank to PsiDOC.
This is the best rom, very stable, fast, working all functions. I have used EXEC more than 3 days but battery shows still over 30%, very long life battery with this rom !!!.
minhsu said:
Very thank to PsiDOC.
This is the best rom, very stable, fast, working all functions. I have used EXEC more than 3 days but battery shows still over 30%, very long life battery with this rom !!!.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Many Thanks Dr. Quyen
Related
Can users of both roms (the Imate Jasjar or Ivan) care to comment on which rom is better? I am running the Ivan beta13 and want to know whether it makes sense to switch.
Thanks.
stanip said:
Can users of both roms (the Imate Jasjar or Ivan) care to comment on which rom is better? I am running the Ivan beta13 and want to know whether it makes sense to switch.
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On my mda pro, ivan's beta 13 works very good. the imate rom does not work so good, it is slow and sometimes my device freezes.
stanip said:
Can users of both roms (the Imate Jasjar or Ivan) care to comment on which rom is better? I am running the Ivan beta13 and want to know whether it makes sense to switch.
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'v tried Ivan's beta 8, 10, 12, 13, and both roms from Jwrightmcps; on my qtek9000 Jwrightmcps's Jasjar rom works definitively better.
Hi Xanadu, could you please more specific on where you see as better? Just a general comment on "better" does not really help me to decide... Thanks.
Hi stanip !
Try both ROMs and you will see which ROM works better on YOUR Universal.
That's the best way to make a decision...
Understand your point re testing it out.
Each rom update took me a fair bit of time (2-3 hours) as I need to reinstall about 10 softwares to my Universal and I need to reenter all the password, settings...etc.
Getting tired of keeping on refreshing... Hope to leverage the experience of other forumers.
Thanks.
My own experience...
I have not used Jwrightmcps's as much (just started playing with it in the last couple of days), but it seams better overall for me. I'm using a MDA Pro on T-Mobile.
It also seams quicker. It's all very subjective at the moment. Biggist factor is probably simply that I have not 'fully loaded' it with tonnes of apps yet.
Things I've noticed which I don't think would be effected by all teh apps being installed.
For Jwrightmcps's :
It does not freeze/loose signal with phone like it did with Ivan's Beta 13. But then I have also switched to Radio 1.11. I don't tink this is the reason though (old radio was fine prior to AKU3.2)
The camera software does not have as much noise on the Screen.
I don't like the Battery Icon on Today screen at the bottom. It shows full till battery is down to around 60%.
Love having USB Drive mode
Laptop finds more BT Profiles.
I'm hoping the competition drives both forward. But since nobody is actually being paid to do anything, don't see why it should. Many thanks to both for all the efforts they are making.
Zuber
stanip said:
Hi Xanadu, could you please more specific on where you see as better? Just a general comment on "better" does not really help me to decide... Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with Zuber, plus I need smartdialer for my 1200 contact, but Ivan's beta 13 rom don't have smartdialer; as I installed it separetely, it took 6 MB RAM.
Sure, the best way is testing both then you can decide....
Jwrightmcps's has more thing than I-Van's but sometime It freezes
Zuber said:
My own experience...
I have not used Jwrightmcps's as much (just started playing with it in the last couple of days), but it seams better overall for me. I'm using a MDA Pro on T-Mobile.
It also seams quicker. It's all very subjective at the moment. Biggist factor is probably simply that I have not 'fully loaded' it with tonnes of apps yet.
Things I've noticed which I don't think would be effected by all teh apps being installed.
For Jwrightmcps's :
It does not freeze/loose signal with phone like it did with Ivan's Beta 13. But then I have also switched to Radio 1.11. I don't tink this is the reason though (old radio was fine prior to AKU3.2)
The camera software does not have as much noise on the Screen.
I don't like the Battery Icon on Today screen at the bottom. It shows full till battery is down to around 60%.
Love having USB Drive mode
Laptop finds more BT Profiles.
I'm hoping the competition drives both forward. But since nobody is actually being paid to do anything, don't see why it should. Many thanks to both for all the efforts they are making.
Zuber
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you receive MMS with the new MMS Composer included? Would you mind sending yourself one and confirming you can receive and download it?
Hi Everyone,
To give xda lovers an idea on the performance characteristics of the most popular 3 WM6 releases, i have just spent the last few hours doing a benchmark using SPB.
The test set up was:
1. OS Flash only
2. No additional Apps after fresh Hard Reset (except SPB Benchmark)
3. Imate Jasjam HT647
4. Main test completed only (no storage card or battery life)
The results speak for themselves (the highest achieving score is marked in red)
EDIT: I forgot the Vanilla ROM. Will update tomorrow, time for sleep, its 5am GMT+10. and only 5 hours sleep in the last 2.75 days.
Thanks,
I know everyone was looking for something like this. Now I know I choose the right OS flavor
Excellent work!!! the dark side wins! wow... maybe I should try it after all
I have a request for all rom cooker and publisher:
PLEASE, once relased a rom, write in the FIRST post:
All possible information about used memory at HR (RAM & Programs).
All reg tweaks included
All external programs installed
Other tweaks like video drivers etc.
All new issues resolved (like VoIP & others)
Someone has done it, someone not. Please post yours cooked rom in this way, so we all can do the right choice, in base at our necessity.
regards
Every time I think I have seen just how resourceful this group is someone comes out of the woodwork and does the yet another thing to surprise me.
(That and a friendly act of one-up-manship )
Many thanks i've been wondering if there was much difference in the speed of the ROMs, now i know. Does any one know how the WM6 ROMs compare to WM5 ROMs speeds?
Yeah - the results do speak for themselves. In my humble opinion, they demonstrate that there is almost nothing to choose between the ROMs in this test because the differences are really tiny. I wonder if you'd even get the same results if you ran the tests a second time?
Thanks for running the tests - interesting stuff!
Izzard-UK said:
Yeah - the results do speak for themselves. In my humble opinion, they demonstrate that there is almost nothing to choose between the ROMs in this test because the differences are really tiny. I wonder if you'd even get the same results if you ran the tests a second time?
Thanks for running the tests - interesting stuff!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sanity! A valuable exercise, but no meaningful difference. Is there en equivalent table for some WM5 ROMS? I keep hearing that WM6 is quicker.
The tables we saw for the different WM5 roms (especially comparing the stock TyTN rom with the south africa and AKU3.3 test roms) were VERY helpfull and the differences were quite noticeable (stability-wise aswell as speed), the WM6 comparisons are all pretty much the same, did the Vanilla rom get a mention at all??
Once we see a full Hermes WM6 rom (from iMate, HTC, Dopod et all) cooked for LVSW,Black or WMXL i predict we may see a noticeable difference from these current ones.
Good thread
What's really frackin kewl about this whole thing is
1. All the roms kick arse.
2. We have a WM6 ROM
3. Have multiple WM6 roms to choose from
4. Start @ 1. and repeat
Don't you just want to laugh! XDA LIVES and it is livin in WM6!
now i personally havent tried any of the wm6, as me and a few others are currently cooking a rom with PTT, i cant go without this feature so i am being patient... I have loaded a few up on my test phone, but havent fully given them a test drive yet... so im not putting anyone or any rom down with this comment, but its something you must realize... fastest doesnt necessarily mean its the most stable. and even if you find one that is stable with your apps doesnt mean its going to be stable for the next guy, its all trial and error
LSVW seems to be the one that runs the most stable without issue and pretty speedy
WM Black runs the fastest, but most unstable for me. Maybe it just the applications I installed having issues. I will works on it again tonight. (After 5 flash......)
WMXL 2.0 has really good features and runs pretty stable too, but somehow it runs slower than other two. A very good custom ROM.
Again, I am not a preofessional give a fair overview. This is just my experience with all 3.
Penske MB said:
LSVW seems to be the one that runs the most stable without issue and pretty speedy
WM Black runs the fastest, but most unstable for me. Maybe it just the applications I installed having issues. I will works on it again tonight. (After 5 flash......)
WMXL 2.0 has really good features and runs pretty stable too, but somehow it runs slower than other two. A very good custom ROM.
Again, I am not a preofessional give a fair overview. This is just my experience with all 3.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i completely agree with you...i tried all three and lsvw seems to be the most stable
Same OS, the test results didn't show any significant different..........just a little bit.
It will be better and perfect test ,if u compare with WM5.
Thk
Hi guys,
the benchmarks I did last night for the 3 roms were done after a clean HR with no additional hacks patches, hence, as they were release by the chef's.
There isnt a significant difference in speed between the three but you will notice that WMXL has around 20mb of free RAM on a fresh HR as it loads more UI data etc in RAM to provide a faster response (this was checked with SKTOOLS).
It will be interesting to see how these roms compare against an official WM6 hermes ROM if one will ever be released.
Nonetheless, as these roms are cooked, expect to find bugs or undisclosed features. If bugs are found, the chefs will try and resolve them etc. Also remember that even though our HERMES are essentially the same, some ROMS wonts work on som devices, so you might have to see what works for you. luckily my JASJAM is compatible with all the roms posted so far so it is pretty universal.
Enjoy the contributions guys and if you can, please donate the xda-developers for the help it has iven you.
I agree that LSVW ROM is the most stable among 3 WM6 ROMs
hatori said:
Same OS, the test results didn't show any significant different..........just a little bit.
It will be better and perfect test ,if u compare with WM5.
Thk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i will do this soon, give ma an hour....or so.....
mtty is getting a work out.
I will flash SA1.35 and an AKU3.3 ROM.
and then post the results in the first post.
Ping Jasjammin, did you do the WM6 v WM% benchmark? Be good to see how they compare on a fresh comparable install
It seems that schaps has fallen behind with releasing the latest 6.1 (due to personal things that he has to deal with), and I've been looking to install a new release on my phone. Which version out today comes closest to what schaps had?
I'm currently using Pays v3.05 lite and I would say its pretty close to schaps ROM's.
MrDSL said:
I'm currently using Pays v3.05 lite and I would say its pretty close to schaps ROM's.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you notice battery drain with Pays ROM?
Cheers
ibeqa said:
Did you notice battery drain with Pays ROM?
Cheers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Honestly I think I need a new battery because its been messed up for awhile so I couldnt say for sure.
ive changed from schaps to pays and the battery drain is over! it's a bug from all schaps versions
My clean version is similar to Schaps'. See link here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=372118
tehCORE said:
ive changed from schaps to pays and the battery drain is over! it's a bug from all schaps versions
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have to say thats a bit unfair. My battery life is much better since I upgraded from WM5 std ROM to Schaps 4.31.
It seems each of us has a different experience and that can be as simple as installed apps location or as random as brand of storage card.
The Chefs put in a lot of effort and to slate a whole series of ROMS from one Chef is unfair and quite probably unjust as I know of several people who are also using Schaps ROMS and experience no such issue.
did you noticed the WM6.1 build number of 4.40 rom by schaps ? is by far the highest ....
Not behind ... just the opposite
Schaps 4.40 - BETA!
Did you noticed, that Schaps 4.40 is not stable BETA version? There are newer and better WM6.1 ROMs. Pays and ShadoW are very good.
I've also been looking for something...waiting for Schaps really. So, should I go Pays?
Faria / Dr Puttingham WM6.1 Collaboration rom
Haven't tried K's or Pays wm6.1 roms but i have to say the Faria/Dr Puttingham collaboration has been my favourite so far.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=368317
Currently waiting for their latest release which should be out in a couple of days.
I am waiting for a good Schaps 6.1 ROM as well, but I need something new. I might install 4.3x just to get some touchflo going. I am still on 4.0.
what's the advantage of using wm6.1 over wm6?
Hello All,
I currently have a WM6 T-Mobile UK MDA Vario II and I'm wondering where I can get the v6.1 update that will work with my Hermes?
KingRichard1st said:
Hello All,
I currently have a WM6 T-Mobile UK MDA Vario II and I'm wondering where I can get the v6.1 update that will work with my Hermes?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have the same phone as you, and any of the WM6.1 roms here will work.
There is no official WM6.1 rom out there.
Follow the FAQ in my sig, flash HardSPL, then pick a rom. (CRC's V13 has been rock solid for me).
Thank you..
Sir... You are a friend indeed! I have since installed the WM6.1 version you have and I must say it's very, very good and stable too (like you said).
Many thanks for getting back to my thread. Your help is very much appreciated..
ps. at last, no more hideous T-Mobile graphics on my phone!
Tmibile mda vario II
I too have this mobile. I have tried around 20 ROMS on this. If you want a full fledged extended ROM for this device use MRH 8.4 sunflower version. If you want a totally naked ROM where you add the softwares later on use 'RBSC V7_CustomNak3d_20753 or PDAVIET V24 Black lite. Both give around 85 mb storage on MDA vario II. MRH will give lot less around 35 - 40 mb but it is fully loaded with all sorts of software including google maps. I vouch that these three work very well with MDA. Schaps ROM are more colourful but slow. CRC is no good. PDAcoerner pro 25 is also a runner up and fully loaded.
My choice is of course MRH 8.4
take your pick.
hmmm..
May I ask why you say CRC is no good..? It seems to work without error on my phone!
Never had any problems with CRC's here, his have always been the best for me!
another vote for CRC
CRC update
In earlier CRC versions I had problems with USB connectivity and wifi dropping frequently. I tested CRC 13 yesterday. It is better and stable no doubt. Even today I have problems with wifi drop with CRC 13. I can not find the reason. I find other ROMs I mentioned earlier to be much faster than CRC ON MY MACHINE. My RADIO is 1.54.30.10 if that has something to do with problems
The MRH 8.4 works smoothly on my machine. However very few post show is as great ROM. It is not even included in the list of great ROMs for some reason.
I would keep testing CRC on and off and it may work great one day.
What do you say about PDAVIET and PDACorner pro latest ROMS on MDA varioII?
rocksolid said:
In earlier CRC versions I had problems with USB connectivity and wifi dropping frequently. I tested CRC 13 yesterday. It is better and stable no doubt. Even today I have problems with wifi drop with CRC 13. I can not find the reason. I find other ROMs I mentioned earlier to be much faster than CRC ON MY MACHINE. My RADIO is 1.54.30.10 if that has something to do with problems
The MRH 8.4 works smoothly on my machine. However very few post show is as great ROM. It is not even included in the list of great ROMs for some reason.
I would keep testing CRC on and off and it may work great one day.
What do you say about PDAVIET and PDACorner pro latest ROMS on MDA varioII?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
MRH 8.4 is CRC V12.7 I think btw
And PDACorners roms have always worked well on my phone, I just dont like the graphics!
crc and mrh
If MRH 8.4 is crc 12.7 then a modified CRC works well for me it seems. However, i read somewhere that there are subtle differences betwwen hermis 100, 200, 300 that may be working well or against a particular ROM.
Well, all the ROM makers are doing great work for us and I am sure all of us are grateful to them.
On the other side Tmobile hardly ever solved my problems and never gave any updates. What was the experiance of other Tmobile MDA vario II users?
rocksolid said:
If MRH 8.4 is crc 12.7 then a modified CRC works well for me it seems. However, i read somewhere that there are subtle differences betwwen hermis 100, 200, 300 that may be working well or against a particular ROM.
Well, all the ROM makers are doing great work for us and I am sure all of us are grateful to them.
On the other side Tmobile hardly ever solved my problems and never gave any updates. What was the experiance of other Tmobile MDA vario II users?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
T mobile, like all the other carriers never bother updating the firmware on there phones, they just expect you to buy a new one!
Thats why XDA is here
Hiya,
Before I get flamed for this I want to make it clear I've tested every custom-brewed rom on xda-dev and have created (and failed) my own rom.
My sole purpose is to have a rom that is all performance based with little to no eye-candy.
Kavana, lovebaby, etc really didn't work for me. I've been using the latest EnergyROM and I like it so far (except for random crashes after sending text messages).
Because of my ignorance, I want to know if there is a rom out there specialized solely for performance that may not be on xda-dev.
Thanks
There isn't any in my opinion cause I have tried all the roms and they always seem to get unstable after continous usage or after a few weeks.
But the original HTC Rom worked great but didn't look so good...
I'm surprised you say Kavana's ROM didn't work for you. I have tried ROM after ROM and I keep going back to Kavana's. For me, It seems to be the best balance of speed (after you bump it up a bit with OMAPClock,) stability, battery life, and flexibility.
Using kavanna ricky remade and all is working great!
I have not made a soft reset in more than 2 months!
But always a new ROM is something attractive
orb3000 said:
Using kavanna ricky remade and all is working great!
I have not made a soft reset in more than 2 months!
But always a new ROM is something attractive
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+2 on this one, I've used kavana's rom for over a year with no issues at all...I moved to a cooked 6.5 rom (3vo) 6 months ago..so there are very good roms out there.
dewey1973 said:
I'm surprised you say Kavana's ROM didn't work for you. I have tried ROM after ROM and I keep going back to Kavana's. For me, It seems to be the best balance of speed (after you bump it up a bit with OMAPClock,) stability, battery life, and flexibility.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I too am using Kavana's remade ROM at the moment. Its the best I have used so far.
Well indeed I've used Kavanas (and actually have re-installed it on my phone about a week ago to give it another go) but I've noticed most of these ROMs fall in line not far from each other.
I'm actually using a 2200mAh extended battery and the battery isn't consumed as much on Kavana's and EnergyROM. I am certain a ROM can created that can far exceed our current ones.
I have down-clocked my CPU but I don't think that should be an option. Thanks to all the guys who have actually put in the time to creating ROMs for the community and I mean do disrespect to you or the work that you have produced. Hey, we're humans and greedy for more