Related
Basically my brother got himself a Nokia N85 the other day and i was having a play around with it and found a really awesome little program that comes with the phone. It gives you the option to transmit all of you music through a FM signal. I was wondering if there is an app to do this with my X1 or could one be made?
Thanks
No FM-transmitter in X1 so... no.
x1 got a fm receiver not a fm transmitter
or transceiver as it would be called if it both send and receive
but you can use fm transmitters with 3.5mm jack of cause it's more troublesome
That clears that up. Thanks.
you would find this on many new walkman phones and some satnavs like my tomtom 930t
Jasand said:
you would find this on many new walkman phones and some satnavs like my tomtom 930t
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The iPhone don't have FM trasmitter hardware. the software belkin to do this...never trasmitter required!
Anyone tried to connect via bluetooth v4.0 to any accessory?
I am trying to connect to a Polar H7 Bluetooth Low Power Heart Rate Monitor with a Samsung S3 with no luck.
Just curious if with a Note II it works?
Thanks
No problems here. But my accessories have been audio. You should check with the cuff vendors to see which profiles/services it needs. If they're pretty standard and in the gn2 stack, they may be able to guide you more.
-----
I would love to help you, but help yourself first: ask a better question
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
But your accessories are also Bluetooth V4.0 Low Energy?
Not necessarily. I use headphones and car stereos.
Each bluetooth version has a specific set of services it adds on from the prior version. When a product uses bluetooth it may choose to use all or only some of the services. What you want to find out is what services your monitor uses. For instance, it may not need A2DP, which are audio services, or HSP handsets.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bluetooth_profile
That link happens to mention low energy requirements.
Once you know the profiles it uses, you can check what the gn2 supports.
I don't know enough about your monitor to be able to help you more. I would suspect the manufacturer of your monitor could help more.
I don't know where you live, but you could try taking it in to the store and attempt to connect it. Ask the salesperson for help.
http://m.samsung.com/uk/consumer/mobile-devices/galaxy-note/galaxy-note/GT-N7100RWDBTU
That does show it supports LE, which I assume is low energy.
-----
I would love to help you, but help yourself first: ask a better question
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
fae said:
Anyone tried to connect via bluetooth v4.0 to any accessory?
I am trying to connect to a Polar H7 Bluetooth Low Power Heart Rate Monitor with a Samsung S3 with no luck.
Just curious if with a Note II it works?
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bit late answer but..
The HR7 is a BLE device and the Note II is a BLE capable device.
However since Google failed to put a proper Bluetooth stack for BLE in it it won't work.
There are some apps in the market that use some kind of samsung library to show that you can actually see the device .
But these work very spotty, i know since i have both the hr7 and the noteii.
And although i can get it to appear in connections dialog windows i have only been able to use it once.
Search the forums for SGIII and BLE you'll find more info.
The bluetooth stack problem is there. Google has not kept the same stack for all versions and also incomplete. AFAIK I think they have changed to broadcom BT stack for 4.1/4.2 and its still incomplete. So maybe at a later version compatibility with all devices will be there.
as of now you could pair unpair a few times. Maybe that might work.
Yes, as far as I know there is not yet any firmware version with a workable ble stack. Keep waiting... meanwhile my Polar H7 heart rate band may become obsolete with the waiting shame on samsung.
connected all my bt devices without any problem..check the settings of ur bt device..
I can also connected all my bt devices without any problem, except those that are Bluetooth version 4.0... like my Polar H7 chest band.
fae said:
I can also connected all my bt devices without any problem, except those that are Bluetooth version 4.0... like my Polar H7 chest band.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
one more here... the same thing...
Bose dock 10 or something like that
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda app-developers app
I have this problem too. I didn't realise I would even need to look into if it would be compatible. I thought the whole point of Bluetooth was it was standard!
So, is this something we can expect to work in the future, or should I just send it back to Amazon?
Can anyone recommend a Heart Rate monitor that will work?
AndyCr15 said:
Can anyone recommend a Heart Rate monitor that will work?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Zephyr HxM.
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk 2
Thanks, that's what I'm looking for. Generally seem to be around £80
The same for me...
But you can also buy the other polar bluetooth hr monitor (the non smart (stupid?) one)
Same price but poor battery life...
Envoyé depuis mon GT-N7100 avec Tapatalk
Do you know what the model name of the 'stupid' one that works is?
AW: [Q] Bluetooth 4.0 on Galaxy Note II
AndyCr15 said:
Do you know what the model name of the 'stupid' one that works is?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Polar WearLink+ BT
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda app-developers app
I couldn't get the Polar H7 Smart heart rate monitor working on the Note 2 with any of the sports apps in the Play Store. Bluetooth low energy (also called Smart) does not appear to be supported on the Note 2. I've decided to order the Zephyr HxM and will be giving that a try on Saturday as an alternative approach. It uses standard Bluetooth and should work. I'm keeping the Polar H7 hoping that later in the year when Android 5 is released we will get working Bluetooth Low Energy (Smart) support. The Samsung site is very misleading and states Bluetooth 4.0 LE support as a feature on the phone. It does not work. There is an app in the Play Store called Smart Scanner that can use the HW in the Note 2 to see the Polar H7 ... it just can not do anything more with it. So the HW is functional; it just lacks Android OS support.
If anyone figures out how to get BLE (ie. Bluetooth Low Energy or Smart) devices working on the Note 2, please post your solution.
UCSB said:
I couldn't get the Polar H7 Smart heart rate monitor working on the Note 2 with any of the sports apps in the Play Store. Bluetooth low energy (also called Smart) does not appear to be supported on the Note 2. I've decided to order the Zephyr HxM and will be giving that a try on Saturday as an alternative approach. It uses standard Bluetooth and should work. I'm keeping the Polar H7 hoping that later in the year when Android 5 is released we will get working Bluetooth Low Energy (Smart) support. The Samsung site is very misleading and states Bluetooth 4.0 LE support as a feature on the phone. It does not work. There is an app in the Play Store called Smart Scanner that can use the HW in the Note 2 to see the Polar H7 ... it just can not do anything more with it. So the HW is functional; it just lacks Android OS support.
If anyone figures out how to get BLE (ie. Bluetooth Low Energy or Smart) devices working on the Note 2, please post your solution.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice summary! :good:
I came to the same conclusion!
Thanks ... I should have also mentioned that when the Samsung Galaxy S 4 was recently announced it seemed to have support for some sports / health apps and gadgets. I was wondering if they were Bluetooth 4.0 LE based. If so, that would lead me to believe that Samsung must have a working Bluetooth 4.0 LE (Smart) patch for the version of Android the phone is going to launch with ... this might mean that there may be some hope for a fix for the Note 2. I'm just speculating here ... but, hoping that Samsung will fix this problem.
Does anyone have a BLE Heart Rate monitor that they've tested and can confirm that it works with the Nexus 5? Also, which app are you using it with?
I know that Endomono is currently trying to make the H7 compatible with their Android app. Does the H7 work with any other Android apps?
Also, it looks as though Runtastic already has a monitor that works with their Android app, but the reviews on Amazon are mixed on compatibility.
Basically, chime in if you have any experience with these or others. Thanks!
sbenson1226 said:
Does anyone have a BLE Heart Rate monitor that they've tested and can confirm that it works with the Nexus 5? Also, which app are you using it with?
I know that Endomono is currently trying to make the H7 compatible with their Android app. Does the H7 work with any other Android apps?
Also, it looks as though Runtastic already has a monitor that works with their Android app, but the reviews on Amazon are mixed on compatibility.
Basically, chime in if you have any experience with these or others. Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have been considering the new Zephyr HxM Smart: www.amazon.com/Zephyr-Monitor-iPhone-Bluetooth-Low-Energy/dp/B009XDTN80/.
I have the original and it is fairly well built. The only negative on the Smart is that it doesn't have rechargeable batteries.
The review here seems to indicate that it works with the Nexus 5: http://www.amazon.com/review/RSQMW1...UTF8&ASIN=B009XDTN80&nodeID=3760901&store=hpc
sbenson1226 said:
Does anyone have a BLE Heart Rate monitor that they've tested and can confirm that it works with the Nexus 5? Also, which app are you using it with?
I know that Endomono is currently trying to make the H7 compatible with their Android app. Does the H7 work with any other Android apps?
Also, it looks as though Runtastic already has a monitor that works with their Android app, but the reviews on Amazon are mixed on compatibility.
Basically, chime in if you have any experience with these or others. Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Zephyr HxM Bluetooth Wireless Heart Rate Sensor for Android
I have this one and it works GREAT! I also have the Polar wearlink and it is not that good. Disconnects all the time and the battery always needs changing. I highly recommend this one and you can recharge it once a week so no need to replace batteries. And it has worked with all the apps I tested so far including Runtastic, Runkeeper and Rundouble C25K.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B002PL33AQ/ref=oh_details_o06_s00_i00?ie=UTF8&psc=1
keitht said:
Zephyr HxM Bluetooth Wireless Heart Rate Sensor for Android
I have this one and it works GREAT! I also have the Polar wearlink and it is not that good. Disconnects all the time and the battery always needs changing. I highly recommend this one and you can recharge it once a week so no need to replace batteries. And it has worked with all the apps I tested so far including Runtastic, Runkeeper and Rundouble C25K.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B002PL33AQ/ref=oh_details_o06_s00_i00?ie=UTF8&psc=1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, but I'm looking for BLE 4.0 only.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Mio Alpha
The Mio Alpha watch works fine, I would assume most Bluetooh LE / Smart HRM would work fine if the app supports it. So far apps that i have tried and works are Runtastic, MapMyRun, and RunnerUp. Ones that still doesn't support it are Endomondo, Strava, Sportstracklive.. sportstracklive the BLE support is on their roadmap.
personally i like the heart rate monitor watch instead of the damn chest strap which is anything but comfortable!
actinium227 said:
The Mio Alpha watch works fine, I would assume most Bluetooh LE / Smart HRM would work fine if the app supports it. So far apps that i have tried and works are Runtastic, MapMyRun, and RunnerUp. Ones that still doesn't support it are Endomondo, Strava, Sportstracklive.. sportstracklive the BLE support is on their roadmap.
personally i like the heart rate monitor watch instead of the damn chest strap which is anything but comfortable!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This one? http://www.amazon.com/Alpha-Straple...UTF8&qid=1385144388&sr=8-2&keywords=mio+alpha
yep, thats the one, you can get it directly from their website as well
it is more about getting the right apps at the moment though for the support, just checked the compatibility of the apps, RunKeeper isn't support yet
sbenson1226 said:
Thanks, but I'm looking for BLE 4.0 only.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i think he linked to the old one. the current one supports BLE 4.0...
http://www.amazon.com/Zephyr-Monito...=8-12&keywords=bluetooth+4+heart+rate+monitor
anyway i have the H7 and it blows. one of the worst products ever. doesnt want to stay paired, signal drops frequently and i can't get it working for more than a few seconds with nexus 5.
It's lame that in 2016 we still have to ask this. Google was very late to the party to implement hands-free profile 1.6 with wideband audio. They just started with the N6 in late 2014, the N5 did not have it. But, the N9 does not have it, the Shield Tablet does not have it, the N10 of course doesn't either, so no Google tablets that I know of (haven't tried a 2013 N7 though).
If you're wondering, so-called HD Voice in bluetooth (not to be confused with the carriers' "HD Voice" which is a similar thing but within their network) is also called wideband audio because normally BT cuts out at about 3kHz for voice/talk. HFP 1.6 wideband doubles the bandwidth to about 7kHz so voice is much, much clearer.
Usually this is advertised for phones cause the carriers are implementing their own HD Voice, and you'd need a BT HFP 1.6 wideband headset to take advantage of that, but what everyone seems to miss is that pretty much all VoIP apps use a wideband codec, and those work great with these HD headsets.
So, if anyone is familiar with this, could you test it on the Pixel C? You'd need a HD Voice headset, of course. I know pretty much all Sony ones are (but for some like the SBH52 and BRH10 you have to explicitly enable it with an app), and most modern ones from the big brands. If you don't know how, you can make a hangouts-to-hangouts voice call from your phone, and listen to the clarity. (Don't use Skype though, I think its Android app while it does use wideband normally, falls back to narrowband for bluetooth.) There shouldn't be much difference between using headphones and using the headset connected to the tablet. If it's not HD Voice, you'll notice a big difference with the higher frequencies, especially the "S".
andy o said:
It's lame that in 2016 we still have to ask this. Google was very late to the party to implement hands-free profile 1.6 with wideband audio. They just started with the N6 in late 2014, the N5 did not have it. But, the N9 does not have it, the Shield Tablet does not have it, the N10 of course doesn't either, so no Google tablets that I know of (haven't tried a 2013 N7 though).
If you're wondering, so-called HD Voice in bluetooth (not to be confused with the carriers' "HD Voice" which is a similar thing but within their network) is also called wideband audio because normally BT cuts out at about 3kHz for voice/talk. HFP 1.6 wideband doubles the bandwidth to about 7kHz so voice is much, much clearer.
Usually this is advertised for phones cause the carriers are implementing their own HD Voice, and you'd need a BT HFP 1.6 wideband headset to take advantage of that, but what everyone seems to miss is that pretty much all VoIP apps use a wideband codec, and those work great with these HD headsets.
So, if anyone is familiar with this, could you test it on the Pixel C? You'd need a HD Voice headset, of course. I know pretty much all Sony ones are (but for some like the SBH52 and BRH10 you have to explicitly enable it with an app), and most modern ones from the big brands. If you don't know how, you can make a hangouts-to-hangouts voice call from your phone, and listen to the clarity. (Don't use Skype though, I think its Android app while it does use wideband normally, falls back to narrowband for bluetooth.) There shouldn't be much difference between using headphones and using the headset connected to the tablet. If it's not HD Voice, you'll notice a big difference with the higher frequencies, especially the "S".
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey Andy o
I have a Plantronics Voyager Edge with Wideband - I use it daily with my N6P on voice calls (GSM).
I'd be happy to pair it with the Pixel C and happy to try via hangouts, but no one I know uses hangouts anymore. PM me if you want to try and test this.
Seems that the pixel c has no hands free Bluetooth profile at all (not narrow band and not wide band). When you connect a Bluetooth headset the tablet pairs but doesn't connect to any hands free profile. It has A2DP for music streaming but if you were thinking of making voip call using a Bluetooth headset, forget it. Pretty lame for a $500+ device.
clubtech said:
Seems that the pixel c has no hands free Bluetooth profile at all (not narrow band and not wide band). When you connect a Bluetooth headset the tablet pairs but doesn't connect to any hands free profile. It has A2DP for music streaming but if you were thinking of making voip call using a Bluetooth headset, forget it. Pretty lame for a $500+ device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Holy crap, it appears you're right. That was unexpected. First, no GPS, then this? Damn that is terrible.
sephstyler said:
Hey Andy o
I have a Plantronics Voyager Edge with Wideband - I use it daily with my N6P on voice calls (GSM).
I'd be happy to pair it with the Pixel C and happy to try via hangouts, but no one I know uses hangouts anymore. PM me if you want to try and test this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the offer, but it appears I already have an answer, worse than I thought!
andy o said:
Holy crap, it appears you're right. That was unexpected. First, no GPS, then this? Damn that is terrible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hence why I returned it. This and the lack of auto correct when typing with the keyboard killed it for me.
I wonder if this is because of the rumors that it was designed for Chrome OS which, unbelievably, just got the HFP profile last July. If so, it might be available in future updates, and would support the notion that the software on this thing was rushed out.
Regardless of the reason, it is simply unacceptable that such a premium device being sold and a high price tag will lack basic features like this.
I'm sure most users won't use a headset with this device but for the price support for it should be included. The original nexus 7 didn't have it either. The second nexus 7 had it (lowband). The nexus 9 had this profile.
This is why apple is doing so well. Everything just works.
I don't even think "premium" comes into play. That any modern tablet or phone doesn't have it is nuts. I can't imagine a modern BT chip not having support for it, so it's probably a software/drivers issue, but who knows if Google will fix it.
BTW, are you sure the 2012 N7 didn't have it? I remember it not having a TRRS (headphone+mic) connector, which also crippled it for Square payments, and which was just as dumb a product design choice. But IIRC one of the workarounds was to use a BT headset.
Also, I don't think the N9 has HFP 1.6 wideband. The audio itself is just terrible in comparison with HD-enabled devices like the N6P, N6 and my iOS devices. Even using a frequency generator just to be super sure has it cut off at just above 3500 Hz which is expected for the narrowband profile. With wideband I can still hear on the other device up to 7800 Hz or so.
Yes I don't think the N9 had wideband either. As far as I can recall the N7 2012 didn't have HFP profile either as I remember it driving me nuts that I couldn't use a Bluetooth headset on it to make voip calls.
I went ahead and opened a thread on the Google product support for the pixel c and it has been escalated. Let's see what comes back and if they intend to enable HFP on this device or not.
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
clubtech said:
I went ahead and opened a thread on the Google product support for the pixel c and it has been escalated. Let's see what comes back and if they intend to enable HFP on this device or not.
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Would you mind linking the thread? I can't seem to find it at the Google product support forums.
https://productforums.google.com/forum/m/#!categories/nexus/pixel-c
it's what i think he mentioned.
Thanks, that's it https://productforums.google.com/forum/#!topic/nexus/f8c_iLUs_rI Will be following it.
clubtech said:
Regardless of the reason, it is simply unacceptable that such a premium device being sold and a high price tag will lack basic features like this.
I'm sure most users won't use a headset with this device but for the price support for it should be included. The original nexus 7 didn't have it either. The second nexus 7 had it (lowband). The nexus 9 had this profile.
This is why apple is doing so well. Everything just works.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't believe the Nexus 7s or the Nexus 9 have HFP support (low or wide). I can confirm the Nexus 9 doesn't, I couldn't use my bluetooth headset for voip calls via Hangouts. Here's Google's table with Bluetooth profiles:
https://support.google.com/nexus/answer/6048862?hl=en
I can confirm that the table is correct about the Nexus 10, I used Plumble and Hangouts perfectly with the same Bluetooth headset as I used above for calls.
BinaryTB said:
I don't believe the Nexus 7s or the Nexus 9 have HFP support (low or wide). I can confirm the Nexus 9 doesn't, I couldn't use my bluetooth headset for voip calls via Hangouts. Here's Google's table with Bluetooth profiles:
https://support.google.com/nexus/answer/6048862?hl=en
I can confirm that the table is correct about the Nexus 10, I used Plumble and Hangouts perfectly with the same Bluetooth headset as I used above for calls.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That table is wrong. I can 100% confirm that the Nexus 9 and Nexus 7 2013 did have hands free support. The Nexus 7 2012 did not.
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
clubtech said:
That table is wrong. I can 100% confirm that the Nexus 9 and Nexus 7 2013 did have hands free support. The Nexus 7 2012 did not.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll have to check my Nexus 9 with Plumble + Bluetooth then, only used it with Hangouts video chat and it worked great, but Hangouts Dialer calls to a phone number wouldn't work with my bluetooth headset.
Anyone here with the Pixel C on the latest developer preview? Can you confirm if they added Bluetooth headset support (hands-free profile)?
How can one check, which Codecs are used over Buetooth ?
On my Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite I can somehow enable under Developper Mode the APT-X and LDAC Codecs,
but how can I test it, if it being used e.g. in Skype for Android or other Voice Applications ?
My Blootooth Stereo Headset has Apt-X , but during Skype calls or a Wireless Video Recorder app, it still uses only the 8 Khz SBC bad audio codecs...
Any idea how I can test it and how to enable the Wideband Audio Codecs ?
Many thanks.
Regards., Stefan.
It has to support mSBC for handset:
https://www.rfwireless-world.com/Terminology/SBC-vs-mSBC-codec.html
An app like Bluetooth Monitor might show more info about the actual connection.
The snapdragon 835 apparently has a FM tuner, and several manufacturers allow the nextradio app to utilize it. I'm not talking about streaming, I mean an actual rf tuner in the FM radio band. For instance I've read the Samsung S8 allows nextradio to use the tuner, as well as the LG V30.
Anyone know if it is possible to use the FM tuner on the Oneplus 5T?
Not that I'm aware of but only that it would be capable of it doesn't mean it is possible. It'd need to have a connected antenna or utilize the wired headphones as such. If the chip does not use them as antenna, it can't even receive FM signals.
It's like having a Bluetooth chip inside but not soldered to the motherboard. Moreover, the functionality could also have been disabled on a hardware level making it impossible to enable it via software.
Maybe it would be possible but then people also tried to enable disabled CPU cores on their budget CPUs without success ?