Haven't posted on XDA in forever. I originally made an account on here because I'm a benchmark nerd and wanted to know what the highest Antutu score on a Note 2 was (It was my first real smartphone). I was just wondering if anyone has overclocked a Note 10 Plus and what their benchmarks are compared to a stock Note. I remember the stock score I got on the Note 2 was about 11,000 and after overclocking was about 19,000 so I'm just wondering if someone has done it if there is about the same percentage of increase in scores. (Highly doubt it's almost double ?)
I would Def interested in this as well. I love benchmarks and am curious how one over clocks a phone if the bootloader is locked? ****ing pay a $1000 for a phone and can't do what I want with it.. My last note was a 3, then got iPhone for a bit. (not sure what I was thinking) I'm back for good now.
What tools does one need for this?
Sent from my SM-N975U1 using Tapatalk
You'd need a custom kernel in order to overclock. Currently there are no custom kernels available for the N10+, but you are welcome to create one yourself, as the kernel sources for our phone are available.
However, I think that the Snapdragon variant will take a while to get a custom kernel, given that the bootloader is locked in the american version. Expect custom kernels for the Exynos variant first.
But I don't think we have much headroom for overclocking on these chips.
We currently don't have much information on the Exynos 9825 in the N10+, so my information is purely based on the Exynos 9820, which is the same CPU but in a slightly larger phabrication (8nm vs 7nm). The 9825 should use a little less power than the 9820.
The 9820 at stock clocks pulls around 3 watts for CPU intensive loads (https://images.anandtech.com/doci/14072/SPEC2006eff-overview_575px.png) and around 5 watts for GPU loads (https://www.anandtech.com/show/14072/the-samsung-galaxy-s10plus-review/10).
Given that the phone is a passive design, we can't expect the phone to cool 5 watts peak performance. which is what we see. The 9825 appears to throttle under certain sustained loads (https://www.computerbase.de/2019-09/samsung-galaxy-note-10-exynos-9825-dauerlast/).
And given how overclocking works, you'd realistically just get a few couple hundred MHz on the Mongoose cores or the A75 cores, before things become unstable or overheat.
The 9820 was already pretty agressive on the voltage curve (https://images.anandtech.com/doci/14072/Exynos9820-Voltages_575px.png), I don't think the Exynos can push that much higher than stock.
But only time can tell when we can test it ourselves with a custom kernel.
If you succeed w/ overclocking, you may wanna compare your scores with the standard Antutu bench I did on both S10e(8/256GB) and N10+(12/256):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wvHYJhfIKw&feature=youtu.be
here you are
n975F Dr ketan s P06
Last fde ai
naya28 said:
here you are
n975F Dr ketan s P06
Last fde ai
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sorry to bother you with something this old, but do you have before and after scores and are you on exynos android 10 or 9?
the scores seems quite higher than stock but we have no reference since you may be running a custom rom.
if you can add some details I would appreciate it alot,thanks for your time.
Aaron_Woolery said:
Haven't posted on XDA in forever. I originally made an account on here because I'm a benchmark nerd and wanted to know what the highest Antutu score on a Note 2 was (It was my first real smartphone). I was just wondering if anyone has overclocked a Note 10 Plus and what their benchmarks are compared to a stock Note. I remember the stock score I got on the Note 2 was about 11,000 and after overclocking was about 19,000 so I'm just wondering if someone has done it if there is about the same percentage of increase in scores. (Highly doubt it's almost double ?)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Theres the bullfrog kernel with tons of optimizations and scores range from 460k-480k.
Kernel though is on telegram and not xda.
Ahmadhmedan said:
sorry to bother you with something this old, but do you have before and after scores and are you on exynos android 10 or 9?
the scores seems quite higher than stock but we have no reference since you may be running a custom rom.
if you can add some details I would appreciate it alot,thanks for your time.[/QUOTEI don t remember but it was on Pie with ketan s Rom and Nemesis kernel I think.
I don t have screenshot of before.
Fde.ai is a really good optimiser.
Now I m on Q but pie was great.
Sorry if I can t help you anymore.
Ciao
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Aaron_Woolery said:
Haven't posted on XDA in forever. I originally made an account on here because I'm a benchmark nerd and wanted to know what the highest Antutu score on a Note 2 was (It was my first real smartphone). I was just wondering if anyone has overclocked a Note 10 Plus and what their benchmarks are compared to a stock Note. I remember the stock score I got on the Note 2 was about 11,000 and after overclocking was about 19,000 so I'm just wondering if someone has done it if there is about the same percentage of increase in scores. (Highly doubt it's almost double ?)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bfg kernel has been, not overclocking, but somewhat stretching the device. Yesterday they peaked 500k in antutu. Normal antutu on bfg kernel is >480k vs stock at 440k.
Related
Hi all,
I've got Leedroid and would like to know how the hell people get the 3000+ scores on quadrant ?
I've used most of the roms with a lot of the kernels but the most i get is around 2500 - 2600 , i've heard that the kernel by Kamma is a good one but i'm at a loss as to which one i should use.
So if anyone could point out which one i could use for .
1. Stability.
2. Battery saving.
3. Benchmarking (without smoking my device of course)
Any answers would be appreciated.
Thanks.
dladz said:
Hi all,
I've got Leedroid and would like to know how the hell people get the 3000+ scores on quadrant ?
I've used most of the roms with a lot of the kernels but the most i get is around 2500 - 2600 , i've heard that the kernel by Kamma is a good one but i'm at a loss as to which one i should use.
So if anyone could point out which one i could use for .
1. Stability.
2. Battery saving.
3. Benchmarking (without smoking my device of course)
Any answers would be appreciated.
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the first thing you need to understand is quadrant is ****, it is not an acurate indication of the speed of your device, a few devs have made kernels that trick quadrant into giving it massive scores, but in reality there kernels are not the best that being said, you wont find a better kernel for stability or speed than leedroids one, it is flawless you can download it here
http://www.multiupload.com/U2ECLTRT7V
AndroHero said:
that being said, you wont find a better kernel for stability or speed than leedroids one, it is flawless you can download it here
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you noticed much difference between 2.0.5 and 2.0.6 kernels? The LeeDroid thread is getting very lengthy to read through these days to catch up on new updates lol!
RobSimmo said:
Have you noticed much difference between 2.0.5 and 2.0.6 kernels? The LeeDroid thread is getting very lengthy to read through these days to catch up on new updates lol!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah the new one is based on the latest kernel source, with the 1.75 libs,
Sent from my Desire HD using Tapatalk
Tbh I use leedroids newest one an its really good, quadrant gets 2500 +
The device is smooth as silk, bit then again it always was.
I didn't know that quadrant was pants, I thought it was a good benchmarking tool.
Confirm that the newest kernel of Lee is the best!but in a few days he prepare a new awesome BFS kernel...
Mmm badly ****ed scheduler. My favourite.
If you want good quadrant, buy the paid app which gives higher scores than the free one. Do the I/O hack which core and lee droids use. Use Leedroid kernel at max freq, performance governor, and finally run it in airplane mode.
Follow all those steps and you will get around the 3000 score.
You should state if you use quadrant standard or advance when posting results as they do differ. Otherwise it's like comparing oranges to mandarins. They are both orange but one is always bigger.
Sent from my super slick Android device.
dr.m0x said:
Mmm badly ****ed scheduler. My favourite.
If you want good quadrant, buy the paid app which gives higher scores than the free one. Do the I/O hack which core and lee droids use. Use Leedroid kernel at max freq, performance governor, and finally run it in airplane mode.
Follow all those steps and you will get around the 3000 score.
You should state if you use quadrant standard or advance when posting results as they do differ. Otherwise it's like comparing oranges to mandarins. They are both orange but one is always bigger.
Sent from my super slick Android device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea it's just the standard version of quadrant, I thought that it would do the job.
Also i don't want to trick it or actually buy an app just so it can give me higher scores, that's not actually helping at all, i'll try the airplane mode to see if that helps, my phone is rapid anyway so it's only for my own satisfaction and to see how high i could get the score to go to.
Although Exynos has the better CPU, the GPUs are quite similar in performance (3D) according to these Antutu scores:
http://www.phonearena.com/news/AnTu...Exynos-shows-20-gain-vs-the-HTC-One-X_id29794
Leaked benches before the S3 launch indicate some advantage though
http://www.phonearena.com/news/Sams...9364#1-Samsung-Galaxy-S-III-with-ARM-Mali-400
I think there are enough HOX vs SG3 threads already in here..why create a new thread just to discuss one aspect of the phone >.>
Yawn.
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
zerozoneice said:
Although Exynos has the better CPU, the GPUs are quite similar in performance (3D) according to these Antutu scores:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
SGS3 is 20% faster when the HOX is in battery save mode. So what?
Or haven't you seen the image closely? The HOX's battery is low. Also if the HOX has been used for a while, the temperature might have been up and the scores are lower. The highest I've had on mine is 11.4k, someone posted with 11.9k (that was on 1.28).
Edit: phonearena DOT com/news/Samsung-Galaxy-S-III-rocks-Quadrant-AnTuTu-and-NenaMark-2-benchmark-tests_id29795
Here the SGS3 has 11.4k. I can hardly say that this counts as "faster".
Yep,
Sgs3 scored 11.4k on AnTuTu, yet my HOX gets 12k
My HOX isn't even running 4.0.4 like the sgs3 is, so - read into this as you like.
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
chrisjcks said:
Yep,
Sgs3 scored 11.4k on AnTuTu, yet my HOX gets 12k
My HOX isn't even running 4.0.4 like the sgs3 is, so - read into this as you like.
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Plus, we're getting these scores using a Gingerbread kernel, so IF or WHEN htc release a true ICS kernel for the Tegra 3 one X, maybe our performance will increase, who knows.
TommUK said:
Plus, we're getting these scores using a Gingerbread kernel, so IF or WHEN htc release a true ICS kernel for the Tegra 3 one X, maybe our performance will increase, who knows.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep, my thoughts exactly.
As I've been a Galaxy S user through the 1st & 2nd models, over in the Samsung forums - they too, see AnTuTu as the best & most accurate bench software.
So, if our HOX is already matching (& in some cases beating) the SGS3, with a lower android OS version & operating on a gingerbread kernel, I really don't see the massive improvement that the exynos offers over our tegra 3 device.
.... At least not in this case.
- plus, at least we get an exclusive range of nvidia optimized games too.
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
the point is that exynos has an overall advantage (slight, not overwhelming) over the T3 but while generating less heat and therefore eating less battery (which is already very large by comparison)
so if they'd run antutu in loop mode, the GS3 will keep running it long after OneX died
all in all, exynos the better CPU with comparable GPU, give them credit where credit is due.
zerozoneice said:
while generating less heat and therefore eating less battery (which is already very large by comparison)
so if they'd run antutu in loop mode, the GS3 will keep running it long after OneX died
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pure speculation .... you don't know this.
Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk 2
zerozoneice said:
the point is that exynos has an overall advantage (slight, not overwhelming) over the T3 but while generating less heat and therefore eating less battery (which is already very large by comparison)
so if they'd run antutu in loop mode, the GS3 will keep running it long after OneX died
all in all, exynos the better CPU with comparable GPU, give them credit where credit is due.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As someone have said around the forum if you have nothing better to do than playing games long enough to drain your battery, surely you can find the time to put your phone on a charger
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
I got 11622 in antutu
Sent from my HTC One X using XDA
Seriously? Who cares about benchmarks.....They are too inconsistant!
Both great devices and fast as hell. Theres nothing more to say about it....
Back in the days regarding the PC gfx battle, there 3dfx, ATI and nVidia, and nVidia beated them all one by one. And I was the first who jumped to use Geforce 256. What make me comfortable even at present time about nVidia is, they really WILL push out revised drivers when necessary. Just be patient guys.
Sent from my HTC One X using XDA
First off all the GPU in GS3 is 50-70% faster than Tegra.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/5810/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-performance-preview
Second of all, the CPU is better, its made out of 32nm, plus offers features such as the 128bit which are featured in Cortex A15. Not to mention this isn't a final product
There's no such thing of Gingerbread kernel or ICS kernel, the kernel we are on is close to 3.0.x kernel, fyi the next number update should bring us to 3.0.x if I'm correct.
MrPhilo said:
First off all the GPU in GS3 is 50-70% faster than Tegra.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/5810/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-performance-preview
Second of all, the CPU is better, its made out of 32nm, plus offers features such as the 128bit which are featured in Cortex A15. Not to mention this isn't a final product
There's no such thing of Gingerbread kernel or ICS kernel, the kernel we are on is close to 3.0.x kernel, fyi the next number update should bring us to 3.0.x if I'm correct.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is so many factors and details in the soc that its hard to say which is better for instance the tegra 3 does use single channel memory but i believe it runs at a higher clock, also this is only an issue if there is a bottle neck here.
Just ran Antutu on my asia htc one x 128 stock and got 1198 without a restart or clearing ram, which i admit is highest i ever got but still, means nothing
MrPhilo said:
First off all the GPU in GS3 is 50-70% faster than Tegra.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/5810/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-performance-preview
Second of all, the CPU is better, its made out of 32nm, plus offers features such as the 128bit which are featured in Cortex A15. Not to mention this isn't a final product
There's no such thing of Gingerbread kernel or ICS kernel, the kernel we are on is close to 3.0.x kernel, fyi the next number update should bring us to 3.0.x if I'm correct.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Our kernel revision is 2.6.39.4 if you cared to look on your phone.
MrPhilo said:
First off all the GPU in GS3 is 50-70% faster than Tegra.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/5810/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-performance-preview
Second of all, the CPU is better, its made out of 32nm, plus offers features such as the 128bit which are featured in Cortex A15. Not to mention this isn't a final product
There's no such thing of Gingerbread kernel or ICS kernel, the kernel we are on is close to 3.0.x kernel, fyi the next number update should bring us to 3.0.x if I'm correct.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I fail to agree with anything you said, except the moddle paragraph.
As long as SGS3 GPU is not slower than average, it doesn't matter how fast it is.
You won't get special enhanced games for it, it's not nVidia.
According to rules for general, stickied in this forum (that noone reads), comparison threads between devices are not allowed.
thread closed....
I am a big fan of benchmarks but are there are really important
Please say what Kenel are you using.
No.
-----
I would love to help you, but help yourself first: ask a better question
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
It really depends what you find important and what's useless. Its just for the certain few enthusiasts who like tweaking their devices and testing out different values to achieve a higher benchmark score and brag about it. I'm one of them although for the Note 2 I see little or no difference in performance when comparing between an over clocked and a stock setting.
Sent from the Rabbit Hole
Some people are disagree with overclock some not, benchmark are high only with overclock but if they are not important what are the reason?
I personally think that having a benchmark with a phones overclock settings turned on is the best way to see the true strength of a phone.
Some phones being overclocked do not even come close to other phones with out it being overclocked
Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda app-developers app
So overclock or no overclock?
What you prefer?
When it comes to mobile phones, be it a ultra top end smartphone, absolutely not.
Swyped from my GT-N7100
for me, benchmark is only for fun and push it to the best performance of Note 2.
but for daily i still overclocked, 1.8GHz
it was stable and response very well..
Good way to compare devices. Although I do not overclock for my daily usage.
They are not for everyday thing but they tell their stories. For example I am a GPU comparison addict. I believe the GPUs are the first aging parts of the chipsets and if the GPU is not enough no matter what CPU or phone it is, it will fade away quickly. So when I am choosing a product I take one of the Nexus devices as a reference. For my Note 2, my referance was Nexus 7. Sİnce it will be getting at least 1.5 year support (the worst scenerio) Note will run any game for that time period.
So GLbenchmark comes in. Then it lets us to compare Nexus 4 and Note 2. What we can learn from it is, for example, Mali 400 is better for higher resolutions since 1080p and 720p results are same. Mali 400s quad core processors are so powerfull that they can not be effected by MSAAx4 or higher resolutions where Adreno 320 tenst to slow down however it has a bottle neck on the pixel processor side and it gets stuck on the Egypt 2.5 test no matter how much we OC it. So newer games will be a problem for Note 2 we can say. For the more older-coded games which are still close to the Egypt 2.1 side Adreno barely has %5-7 advantage over the Mali 400 so no problem for a long time.
Thanks for reply:good:
Greetings!
Just curious about what you guys are getting and what ROM/Kernel and speeds you are using.
My best score is:
Normal: 4257 Extreme:3060
This is running 1.8Ghz and 800Mhz CPU (Perseus kernel). Amnospherum Rom.
With saber kernel I only get
Normal: 3065
Extreme: 2351
Running 1.92Ghz and GPU stock speed since the ocing is broken for the GPU.
Regards
UPDATE: 06/06/2013
Running AOSP Rom and Devil Kernel...new best score 5330! This is it for me
I got
Normal: 3572=hw3d.force tweak.
Extreme: 2712
Added build.prop: hw3d.force=1
Running skynote rom at 1.6 ghz
Kernel_perseus
this message was brought to you by,NOTE2SKYNOTE2.
My Samsung Galaxy Note II scored 2400 in the Ice Storm Extreme benchmark test. http://bit.ly/3dmark-android
My Samsung Galaxy Note II scored 3155 in the Ice Storm benchmark test. http://bit.ly/3dmark-android
Rom is bone stock UCAMA4...4.1.2....un-rooted.
Not bad !!
Well above average scores according to the comparisons.
I'd better run this for a while. ...g
I also get similar scores as you all, but the biggest factor is our GPU we are running a older version of drivers witch is 2.0 GL the nexus for example is running a 3.0 open GL.
It's also running 4.2 while I'm still at 4.1 not sure if that has anything to do with but on that 3d mark it gives you a graph. Processors at 11125, Graphics at 2356. I've seen the nexus graph at we beat the processor hands down our GPU in the other hand is found lacking. Nexus processor 9522 GPU 10119.
Not even sure if updating the GL version will help or its in the hardware.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 using xda app-developers app
Here is my very best and Quadrant of 8800 as well ...dont think I am getting much more of it without it burning down lol
Nice numbers
sent by my CARBON NOTE 2
shaolin95 said:
Here is my very best and Quadrant of 8800 as well ...dont think I am getting much more of it without it burning down lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Uh....yeh
Did it smoke at all when you ran that score ?...LOL....g
hahah not really...it does not even get that warm. Gosh I remember one day OCing my Captivate...that glass was about to explode..it was hard to touch it!
JDevil roms usually clock quads 8k+ stock with no kernel. Pictures all over his rom. Wish some of those guys would chime in. There was a few of like 8300 on 1st few pages and some of jeremyandroids other roms all around 9k and pictures. Just saying. You may would want to try his stuff if you enjoy high quads etc.
shaolin95 said:
hahah not really...it does not even get that warm. Gosh I remember one day OCing my Captivate...that glass was about to explode..it was hard to touch it!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The good old days of burning single and dual core chips. ..Lol
Fun stuff. ..g
Darn it, almost got the 5K mark to be happy
shaolin95 said:
Darn it, almost got the 5K mark to be happy
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow, that is a great score.
this message was brought to you by,NOTE2SKYNOTE2.
I thought I was done but I decided to post one last screenshot because with Avatar ROM and the Devil Kernl I am finally able to break the 5K barrier...heck even got 5200 on that last run!
The app is blatantly biased towards adreno gpus though... The Dev tried to say the adreno 220 is more powerful than ours, and that's why it typically gets a better score lol
crixley said:
The app is blatantly biased towards adreno gpus though... The Dev tried to say the adreno 220 is more powerful than ours, and that's why it typically gets a better score lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Saw that...lol
Funny people ...g
My best score so far, carbon ROM 1.6 ghz
Extreme ice storm
Thanks for sharing amigo!
I just did my best score an hour ago too
Nice!!
New best ice storm score carbon ROM 1.6ghz.
Liquidsmooth and Devil Kernel. [email protected] [email protected]
Care to share your specifics for devil? My physics suck.
I know, I'm sorry, benchmarks, who needs them? The reason I'm testing is because I bought this phone used and I want to make sure that it's not broken in some way. I have a friend who is flipping HTC 10's and he's been doing benchmarks on each one that comes across his desk, and it seems like they're quite a bit different than mine.
On the stock rom my Antutu score has ranged from 108,000 to 152,000. Each time there's up to a 20,000 point difference. In my experience, your benchmark scores shouldn't change much unless you change something, so why the 45K range in scores? Not only that, but in Lineage 14.1 my scores drop significantly, down to 72,000, with the highest at 98,000.
I performed a RUU today and my scores are still flexing between 108 and 118K.
GeekBench 4 is a similar issue, my multicore performance has ranged from 1700 to 4100, and my single core from 1100 to 1700.
On a regular basis my Droid turbo (from 2014, running Lineage 14.1) is beating my HTC One in both tests. Do I have a bad phone, or is this normal behavior for the Sprint 10?
My buddy gets about 4000/1700 in geekbench and about 118K in Antutu, and his scores don't seem to change very much. He's running Lineage 14.1.
thunder2132 said:
I know, I'm sorry, benchmarks, who needs them? The reason I'm testing is because I bought this phone used and I want to make sure that it's not broken in some way. I have a friend who is flipping HTC 10's and he's been doing benchmarks on each one that comes across his desk, and it seems like they're quite a bit different than mine.
On the stock rom my Antutu score has ranged from 108,000 to 152,000. Each time there's up to a 20,000 point difference. In my experience, your benchmark scores shouldn't change much unless you change something, so why the 45K range in scores? Not only that, but in Lineage 14.1 my scores drop significantly, down to 72,000, with the highest at 98,000.
I performed a RUU today and my scores are still flexing between 108 and 118K.
GeekBench 4 is a similar issue, my multicore performance has ranged from 1700 to 4100, and my single core from 1100 to 1700.
On a regular basis my Droid turbo (from 2014, running Lineage 14.1) is beating my HTC One in both tests. Do I have a bad phone, or is this normal behavior for the Sprint 10?
My buddy gets about 4000/1700 in geekbench and about 118K in Antutu, and his scores don't seem to change very much. He's running Lineage 14.1.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Perhaps it's thermal throttling?
Nougat update improved things on that front. Are you on Marshmallow? Also you can try going into developer option and setting High Performance mode and then doing your test to see if you get improved scores.
Tarima said:
Perhaps it's thermal throttling?
Nougat update improved things on that front. Are you on Marshmallow? Also you can try going into developer option and setting High Performance mode and then doing your test to see if you get improved scores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think you're probably right on the thermal throttling side of things. I'm on Lineage 14.1 now, and if I run a benchmark after the phone has been idle for a while it's in the 138K range where it's supposed to be. Overclocked on stock is where I'm getting closer to 145K. I think I was doing too many tests, and when they were bad, I'd flash to another ROM (while charging) which didn't help with the thermal side of things.
Thermal throttling also would explain why if you do one test, then immediately repeat it the phone will score worse, which happens every time I try it.
I'm not on MM, I did a RUU to the latest version of N and then unlocked from there.