Most of us want stock androidhttp://cloud.tapatalk.com/s/59b0bfb95f38c/SVID_20170907_090221.mp4http://cloud.tapatalk.com/s/59b0c02ae84bd/SVID_20170907_090246.mp4
Sent from my BLN-L22 using Tapatalk
loll....not possible...just flash aosp custom rom after bugs are resolved
sreekantt said:
loll....not possible...just flash aosp custom rom after bugs are resolved
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly, they won't ditch EMUI this easily
EMUI is another important project to HUAWEI at this moment.
But I can feel stock Android is a trend in future.
Xiaomi dropped MIUI in one device. I never thought I'd see that happen...
PloniAlmoni said:
Xiaomi dropped MIUI in one device. I never thought I'd see that happen...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you're talking about the A1, because it's an android One project (in partrner ship with google)
Xiaomi hardware and google software.
PalakMi said:
If you're talking about the A1, because it's an android One project (in partrner ship with google)
Xiaomi hardware and google software.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ah.. so it's more like a Nexus device from Xiaomi, sort of like when HTC had both Nexus and HTC Sense Android phones...
PloniAlmoni said:
Xiaomi dropped MIUI in one device. I never thought I'd see that happen...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dropping in one device doesnt mean they will continue with pure android. That was a specific project.
PloniAlmoni said:
Ah.. so it's more like a Nexus device from Xiaomi, sort of like when HTC had both Nexus and HTC Sense Android phones...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, exactly.
Personally EMUI grew on me...
I think I'll prefer it over stock Android now...?
[email protected] said:
Personally EMUI grew on me...
I think I'll prefer it over stock Android now...?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do like it too but, I'll prefer the stock experience above any other skin always
PalakMi said:
I do like it too but, I'll prefer the stock experience above any other skin always
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I like the minimalist design approach of stock Android....but it's kind of featureless when compared to EMUI.....
It will be great if we get visuals of stock Android and features of EMUI....??
PalakMi said:
I do like it too but, I'll prefer the stock experience above any other skin always
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Plus bloat free. They collect many things in background
---------- Post added at 03:40 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:39 PM ----------
[email protected] said:
I like the minimalist design approach of stock Android....but it's kind of featureless when compared to EMUI.....
It will be great if we get visuals of stock Android and features of EMUI....??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha that is difficult in recent time.
[email protected] said:
I like the minimalist design approach of stock Android....but it's kind of featureless when compared to EMUI.....
It will be great if we get visuals of stock Android and features of EMUI....??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That would be the perfect match
---------- Post added at 03:47 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:46 PM ----------
shashank1320 said:
Plus bloat free. They collect many things in backgroung
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not to mention, they don't have to deal with updating the framework and apps with every release of a newer android version
Related
Thete is hardly any development on this phone. My note 2 and 3 there were tons of roms. But it's dead here . Every one leave sprint? Not that i blame them sprint is pretty lame. ..
Nah, my guess would be that since we all know Lollipop 5.xx is coming, the developers are probably waiting. It's still a pretty new device too. Jmho...
Sent from my Galaxy Note 4
Cm and asop romz are built almost daily n there getting more stable
Hybrid-X Stock ROM is probably the most stable and best rom out at the moment. He is also woking on a dark version of the Stock rom. Soo many options unlocked in this rom.
I use to use CM as it was basically "Rooting for Dummies" I am not cutting anyone down (I use to love CM) but you dont have to think with that rom you install and it does the rest it will even update the rom for you. You dont have to think when you have that rom, you are safe and should not have any problems which is why I loved it. However their roms were not stable and updating too often so I tried other builds and found Hybrid-X to be the best so far.
My guess is tho everyone else is waiting for Lolipop to arrive. But tx is still working hard on his ROM and is always improving it even when he says he is done for a while, all of a sudden there is an update or a new mod you can use. If you dont use his at least watch the build and see what is still going on with his rom.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/note-4-sprint/development/rom-t2956667
---------- Post added at 11:23 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:18 PM ----------
Oh and Sprint may seem lame to you, but all carriers have their own pros and cons. For me I left verizon and came to sprint for the unlimited data and I pay a lot less monthly. Went from having to data-mine and count my megabites, to not having to worry, and I typically use 60-70 gigs a month on just my phone I get my money's worth.
xyojimbox said:
Thete is hardly any development on this phone. My note 2 and 3 there were tons of roms. But it's dead here . Every one leave sprint? Not that i blame them sprint is pretty lame. ..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe we should all jump ship to Verizon or AT&T. Oh wait, there is no development on either because you can't even root their Note 4's...
Sent from my SM-N910P using XDA Free mobile app
I was also curious about this, I'm not too familiar with the whole developer side of android, so I'm learning!
When the official lollipop version is released for the Note 4, will we see more ROMs being developed?, and higher quality? Or should I expect things to stay about the same?
I've really really enjoyed several ROMs I've tested, I'm just curious what to expect once the official Lollipop TW is released.
Good things come to those who wait
Someone on the Hybrid page said they went back to stock and are currently downloading Lollipop. Posted screen shots too, won't be that much longer if this is actually the case. I would assume there will be a lot more action soon, or else the roms that are being made will be the best and there will be no need for a ton of different ones.
2PMintheAM said:
I've really really enjoyed several ROMs I've tested, I'm just curious what to expect once the official Lollipop TW is released.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No we just got lolipop
---------- Post added at 12:24 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:23 PM ----------
Lolipop is out now for us
And now its eerily quiet out here now... Everyone must be trying to make the best Lollipop ROM! And trying to fix the bugs.
I know which ROM my money is on.
Soulforged666 said:
And now its eerily quiet out here now... Everyone must be trying to make the best Lollipop ROM! And trying to fix the bugs.
I know which ROM my money is on.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Xnote
xyojimbox said:
Thete is hardly any development on this phone. My note 2 and 3 there were tons of roms. But it's dead here . Every one leave sprint? Not that i blame them sprint is pretty lame. ..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can see English is not your strongest subject.
Soulforged666 said:
And now its eerily quiet out here now... Everyone must be trying to make the best Lollipop ROM! And trying to fix the bugs.
I know which ROM my money is on.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@tx_dbs_tx 's hybrid X. ?
Smart bet! Thank you!
---------- Post added at 05:45 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:34 PM ----------
schlepprock said:
Nah, my guess would be that since we all know Lollipop 5.xx is coming, the developers are probably waiting. It's still a pretty new device too. Jmho...
Sent from my Galaxy Note 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This was exactly the reason for the hault in production in KK roms. At least it was for me. No point wasting time on a soon-to-be out of date build. And to sum up the OP's initial post... for anyone who is not happy with the lack of roms for your phone, then there are options for you. You can learn to build your own roms and you can also donate to developers to support and encourage then to continue buildg roms for free. The only reason i started building roms for the Note 4 was because there was really not many if any devs building roms for us sprint users. I made the choice to get off my @$$ and do something about it instead of crying and making posts about it. FYI to anyone not aware... building roms takes a LOT of work and a lot of time. Take that for what it's worth. I would love to sit on my @$$ and wait for awesome roms to come out and not have to build them myself!!! That's the sweet life!!! to those of you who have shown your support and respect to the few devs here in the Sprint note 4 forums, we ALL Thank You!!!
When Will We Get The New oxygen Os 4.5.0 for our OnePlus 3?? It Rockzz Will We Get That In Future???
hahaha being a freeloader myself I came here today explicitly to get an answer to this question. But I am patient and wouldn't ask for an ETA though. It WILL come eventually I know.
Lol, we can be lucky if we still get any updates because the focus is now on the OP5 i bet. I think Android O is the same lie like the OP2 get Nougat back in the days...
But thank god the rom community for OP3 is very big, so we can still get updates through roms.
Well, their software support did improve a lot since OP2 days, so I'd say there is a hope for OOS 4.5 and even 5.0 (Android O).
But I don't expect it to come instantly.
That said, the devices (3/3T and 5) are still quite similar and sources are up, so we'll probably get at least unofficial ports soon.
Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using Tapatalk
Give it some time
reading mode is the only real addition - everything else is already available on the official or Open Beta releases
you can get it now on the latest open beta...
theduke7 said:
you can get it now on the latest open beta...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
reading mode too?
We already have all features of the oneplus 5 in open beta so i dont think we need 4.5.0 and beta is pretty stable so far. Only thing i am hoping for them to give update to Android O but even if they dont we have a pretty great developer community and will surely get android O from custom roms
---------- Post added at 03:49 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:46 PM ----------
2x4 said:
reading mode too?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It should be similar to the monochromacy mode in simulate color space under Hardware accelerated rendering in Developer settings.
I think updates for the OP3/T may depend on if the 5 does well enough, if it does not do as well then they will prob slow the updates for 3/T like Apple does so u have to get the new version, but if it does as good as the 3 did they will prob keep it updated until next release, which I will prob wait for if they stop jacking up the price almost 100.00 every time
Hello from the future, yes we will, and we have received it today
Motassem MK said:
Hello from the future, yes we will, and we have received it today
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Post some screenshots
Pankaj Rai said:
Post some screenshots
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hello buddy unfortunately I haven't received the OTA yet but there are plenty of screenshots and videos over the internet
Motassem MK said:
Hello buddy unfortunately I haven't received the OTA yet but there are plenty of screenshots and videos over the internet
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Download opera vpn change location to canada then goto settings check for updates .
Is it possible to update htc 10 camera app to a newer version (it currently is 8.6 something on oreo stock ) . As far as I know there is a 9.* version. Is there a way to use a newer version of htc camera that better utilizes the sensor or the best way is to find a good enough google camera app ( since many are buggy )
..
leodiavata said:
Is it possible to update htc 10 camera app to a newer version (it currently is 8.6 something on oreo stock ) . As far as I know there is a 9.* version. Is there a way to use a newer version of htc camera that better utilizes the sensor or the best way is to find a good enough google camera app ( since many are buggy )
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. Install one of the UpDates from HTC Camera.
Ehm did not really work. Get an error app not installed during installation.
Chucktr said:
Yes. Install one of the UpDates from HTC Camera.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did not really work. Get an error during installation of any version . App not installed.
Apologies
leodiavata said:
Did not really work. Get an error during installation of any version . App not installed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My humblest apologies for being so late on this -but- you can try these two apps from Google Play:
Camera FV-5 Lite and
Cinema FV-5 Lite
There are also Pro versions which will cost you some dollars.
They have lots of settings. The HTC camera did both the stills and videos but these are two separate apps.
Take care,
-Chuck
Is there any port of HTC Cameara making it work on ROMs without Sense like LOS?
Meshok said:
Is there any port of HTC Cameara making it work on ROMs without Sense like LOS?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How would that be possible without the sense framework ?
Los no sense = no sense framework layer.
If it would be possible it would have been done years ago .....
This actually installs on crdroid N.
Can't say for O, P, Q
But gcam takes far better shots.
https://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-s10/themes/htc-sense-s10s-t3917979
Mr Hofs said:
How would that be possible without the sense framework ?
Los no sense = no sense framework layer.
If it would be possible it would have been done years ago .....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sense Framework is just a set of native libs + APKs.
When you need to port an app using them, you just have to "bake" them into your app's APK. So instead of using system-wide installed stuff, a ported app would use the ones from its own APK.
The only major two issues are poorer compatibility of such app across Android SDK versions and larger APK size compared to the original APK targetted a system with pre-installed Sense.
Actually, HTC has published a set of its Sense apps available for any device already.
And fortunately, HTC Camera works on LOS 16
---------- Post added at 09:47 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:40 AM ----------
andybones said:
This actually installs on crdroid N.
Can't say for O, P, Q
But gcam takes far better shots.
https://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-s10/themes/htc-sense-s10s-t3917979
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you the link, I didn't know about this port.
What do you mean by "gcam takes far better shots"? If you're talking about image quality it depends solely on camera's hardware quality (which obviously is the same in both cases) + a set of settings a camera app sends to the hardware for taking an image.
How a generic gcam written to work with any cameras from horrible ones to best-of-breed (thus having multitude of compromises in its source code) could send better settings to the HTC OEM hardware compared to a HTC's own native Camera app on HTC device?
Meshok said:
Sense Framework is just a set of native libs + APKs.
When you need to port an app using them, you just have to "bake" them into your app's APK. So instead of using system-wide installed stuff, a ported app would use the ones from its own APK.
The only major two issues are poorer compatibility of such app across Android SDK versions and larger APK size compared to the original APK targetted a system with pre-installed Sense.
Actually, HTC has published a set of its Sense apps available for any device already.
And fortunately, HTC Camera works on LOS 16
---------- Post added at 09:47 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:40 AM ----------
Thank you the link, I didn't know about this port.
What do you mean by "gcam takes far better shots"? If you're talking about image quality it depends solely on camera's hardware quality (which obviously is the same in both cases) + a set of settings a camera app sends to the hardware for taking an image.
How a generic gcam written to work with any cameras from horrible ones to best-of-breed (thus having multitude of compromises in its source code) could send better settings to the HTC OEM hardware compared to a HTC's own native Camera app on HTC device?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lmao
don't know or care
a thank you doesn't hurt either.
andybones said:
lmao
don't know or care
a thank you doesn't hurt either.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, just checking since in your OP you've said it so that I've thought there are objective measures why gcam would produce better shots than HTC Cam.
Meshok said:
Ok, just checking since in your OP you've said it so that I've thought there are objective measures why gcam would produce better shots than HTC Cam.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL dude, OP stands for "Opening Post" and that's not me.
And I have nothing to do with gcam development, like literally what are you talking about bro?
Try them both out.. I didn't have to find that htc camera app for you and I have no interest in using it..
Meshok said:
Ok, just checking since in your OP you've said it so that I've thought there are objective measures why gcam would produce better shots than HTC Cam.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hold on, you are asking why you can’t use HTC sense camera on non sense ROMs yet HTC camera works on Los which is a non sense ROM..... if that is so why do you ask such a question ?
That is a massive contradiction.........making it so that your initial question doesn’t stand ground at all.
Cheers, enjoy the htc camera
Meshok said:
Ok, just checking since in your OP you've said it so that I've thought there are objective measures why gcam would produce better shots than HTC Cam.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You know, you could Google for an explanation instead of going after @andybones, the person that tried to help you out with a great suggestion.
If you take a little time you'll see that the gcam ports are omnipresent, every single device subforum has a request or a thread for one. To answer your question, it's been known for a while now that the hardware isn't the only, or even main determining factor for image quality in smartphones, and Google showed that better then anyone with the Pixel lineup. Those devices have inferior camera hardware, but shoot the absolute best pics. And it's all down to the software processing that the camera app has, which still works with the ports, even with the shortcuts and loss of features that are expected.
Go ahead and give it a try, I actually came back to this forum looking for the port so I can install it on my mom's HTC 10 since the stock camera is pretty underwhelming
andybones said:
LOL dude, OP stands for "Opening Post" and that's not me.
And I have nothing to do with gcam development, like literally what are you talking about bro?
Try them both out.. I didn't have to find that htc camera app for you and I have no interest in using it..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@andybones Oh, sorry! I've made an outrageous mistake by typing 'your OP' instead of 'your answer to me'. Not everyone has perfect English here. Excuse me, sir! Thank you for letting me know what's OP acronym stands for!
I haven'r said you have something to do with gcam development. Let me repeat myself:
>>> You've said it so that I've thought there are objective measures why gcam would produce better shots than HTC Cam.
That's all what I've meant to say you in response.
If I'd get objective arguments instead of personal opinions why gcam could be better and in which respects, I'll definitely try it out and only if those respects would be important to me.
---------- Post added at 02:33 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:25 PM ----------
Mr Hofs said:
Hold on, you are asking why you can’t use HTC sense camera on non sense ROMs yet HTC camera works on Los which is a non sense ROM..... if that is so why do you ask such a question ?
That is a massive contradiction.........making it so that your initial question doesn’t stand ground at all.
Cheers, enjoy the htc camera
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow Did you know that Sense apps could (and are) ported on non-Sense ROMs?
If you did not, do a research on this topic before commenting on something you know little about.
---------- Post added at 02:47 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:33 PM ----------
igor_anta said:
it's been known for a while now that the hardware isn't the only, or even main determining factor for image quality
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I haven't said 'only'. Instead, I added the following '+' clause to my initialstatement:
>>> image quality it depends solely on camera's hardware quality (which obviously is the same in both cases) + a set of settings a camera app sends to the hardware for taking an image.
igor_anta said:
Google showed that better then anyone with the Pixel lineup. Those devices have inferior camera hardware, but shoot the absolute best pics. And it's all down to the software processing that the camera app has, which still works with the ports
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If gcam was absolute best with Pixel hardware, why do we know it'd be absolute best with any other random hardware like HTC 10 hardware?
Meshok said:
@andybones Oh, sorry! I've made an outrageous mistake by typing 'your OP' instead of 'your answer to me'. Not everyone has perfect English here. Excuse me, sir! Thank you for letting me know what's OP acronym stands for!
I haven'r said you have something to do with gcam development. Let me repeat myself:
>>> You've said it so that I've thought there are objective measures why gcam would produce better shots than HTC Cam.
That's all what I've meant to say you in response.
If I'd get objective arguments instead of personal opinions why gcam could be better and in which respects, I'll definitely try it out and only if those respects would be important to me.
---------- Post added at 02:33 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:25 PM ----------
Wow Did you know that Sense apps could (and are) ported on non-Sense ROMs?
If you did not, do a research on this topic before commenting on something you know little about.
---------- Post added at 02:47 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:33 PM ----------
I haven't said 'only'. Instead, I added the following '+' clause to my initialstatement:
>>> image quality it depends solely on camera's hardware quality (which obviously is the same in both cases) + a set of settings a camera app sends to the hardware for taking an image.
If gcam was absolute best with Pixel hardware, why do we know it'd be absolute best with any other random hardware like HTC 10 hardware?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't care enough to get wound up, so I'll put this as nice and clearly as I can for you.
#1 - here at XDA this is an ENGLISH ONLY forum, so no you aren't excused.
#2 - yes, OP stands for ONE thing here. Opening Post. Not whatever you come up with as type.
#3- do us all a favor and go read the rules.
#4- I can't even begin to tell you how ridiculous you sound using MY SEACHING and answer to be petty to others. How about you go and search. If you did, I wouldn't of needed to hand feed you and be here dealing with you.
#5- it amazes me that you honestly think that anyone is going to stumble on this post and be like yeaa, let's help this guy out. No. You literally just saved everyone a lot of trouble and their time.
I said try them both, that's not being objective.
This is a joke.
:laugh:
andybones said:
I don't care enough to get wound up, so I'll put this as nice and clearly as I can for you.
#1 - here at XDA this is an ENGLISH ONLY forum, so no you aren't excused.
#2 - yes, OP stands for ONE thing here. Opening Post. Not whatever you come up with as type.
#3- do us all a favor and go read the rules.
#4- I can't even begin to tell you how ridiculous you sound using MY SEACHING and answer to be petty to others. How about you go and search. If you did, I wouldn't of needed to hand feed you and be here dealing with you.
#5- it amazes me that you honestly think that anyone is going to stumble on this post and be like yeaa, let's help this guy out. No. You literally just saved everyone a lot of trouble and their time.
I said try them both, that's not being objective.
This is a joke.
:laugh:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All you're saying is so sad to hear You make me really feel my quilt. But I promise you I will do my best to correct all the things you've mentioned above! Hopefully, you'd excuse me one day seeing my effort to become a better human being...
Also, next time when somebody would ask me about a 'camera app X port' in a topic dedicated to that canera X app, I'd answer 'Dude, camera app Y is the best, But don't ask me why. Use Google to prove my own opinion'.
Thank you fir this lesson, too! Is this also a rule in your XDA rule set?
Nothing was accomplished . Please delete.
That's fair enough.
I just attempted to get your objective arguments on your subjective statement.
Because 'X is better than Y' without objective arguments is a subjective statement. If you're not gonna provide them here, that's fine. Nobody is hurt
I think we've perfectly understood each other So following your great example - I'm not gonna continue the 'gcam is better than X' discussion anymore. Thank you for your advice and have a great evening!
Nothing was accomplished, please delete.
I like the phones hardware but hate MIUI. When I buy an Android phone, I'd like it to use, you know, Android. Crazy, I know. Do MIUI free ROMs usually come out for these devices?
Yepp. When manufacturer will publish real source codes...
---------- Post added at 09:29 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:06 PM ----------
emkorial said:
I like the phones hardware but hate MIUI. When I buy an Android phone, I'd like it to use, you know, Android. Crazy, I know. Do MIUI free ROMs usually come out for these devices?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Until then try this: https://forum.xda-developers.com/redmi-7/development/rom-havoc-os-2-6-t3944405
Does Xaomi do that? This is my first phone by them and I'm going to return it cause MIUI sucks ass, but if they usually release source after a certain time I can look for that and maybe buy it again in the future.
JulianJenner said:
Yepp. When manufacturer will publish real source codes...
---------- Post added at 09:29 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:06 PM ----------
Until then try this: https://forum.xda-developers.com/redmi-7/development/rom-havoc-os-2-6-t3944405
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm confused. So that's different than the kernel sources?
Darth Bidder said:
I'm confused. So that's different than the kernel sources?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No. No different.
But the manufacturer has released something they calls kernel source, but unfortunately, the developers were unable to work on it, so I wrote "as soon as the real sources are released"...
Some reckless and enthusiastic developers (Respect and gratitude to them!), trying to work blindly and produce custom ROMs. Which I was linked is the first one that no longer uses MIUI base....
I'm not infallible, but I think so.
There's some AOSP based ROMS here or on 4pda
GSI roms and independent zip roms are different.
GSI roms based on MIUI.
The original question was, are there any systems that completely eliminate MIUI. Thanks for the information ... I will look around on "4pda" ...
Tapatalkkal küldve az én Redmi 7 eszközömről
JulianJenner said:
GSI roms and independent zip roms are different.
GSI roms based on MIUI.
The original question was, are there any systems that completely eliminate MIUI. Thanks for the information ... I will look around on "4pda" ...
Tapatalkkal küldve az én Redmi 7 eszközömről
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The phone doesn't even have Pixel experience. Which kinda sucks. Hope it will have in the future.
Kindly don't leave samsung A71 users alone.we have to much hope and faith that the developers will be developing their ROMS for this device too.
Thanks
Regards
XDAFan
If you check other 730 or 730G devices, you can quickly find two flaws.
- There are no roms or development whatsoever.
- The battery life / power usage of this specific chip is pretty bad.
It is rumored that the Pixel 4a (or XL?) will use a 730, so that may help, even though Pixel 3a has never had any rom development either really.
h8Aramex said:
If you check other 730 or 730G devices, you can quickly find two flaws.
- There are no roms or development whatsoever.
- The battery life / power usage of this specific chip is pretty bad.
It is rumored that the Pixel 4a (or XL?) will use a 730, so that may help, even though Pixel 3a has never had any rom development either really.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol !
So what ? this device won't get root or even twrp ??
Do you mean that ?
h8Aramex said:
If you check other 730 or 730G devices, you can quickly find two flaws.
- There are no roms or development whatsoever.
...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think this is true and I believe there's nothing wrong with 730 / 730G. You say that there are no roms or development WHATSOEVER for other devices running the same SoC, take a look over Redmi K20 / Xiaomi Mi 9T sub-forum here: https://forum.xda-developers.com/mi-9t/development. I can see many roms available already so neither the 730 is bad nor the devices running on top of it are left in the dust. It is a matter of market interest and let's be honest, many mid-range devices exist that give better value for money than Galaxy A71 and it happens that most of them run other SoC and therefore, 730 may not get enough attention and that's all.
h8Aramex said:
...
- The battery life / power usage of this specific chip is pretty bad.
...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sorry but this is just BS. Here's what Qualcomm says about it:
The Snapdragon 730 serves up powerful performance and impressive battery life. It’s built to handle some of the most sophisticated on-device interactions, fueled by an 8nm process for extreme power efficiency in a small size.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is not that Qualcomm advertising their SoC, the better the technology (8nm), the more power-efficiency the SoC is. If you still insist on you opinion, please share some references that backs your claim up.
I believe the best statement to say here already said by the OP in the topic title: we want fully developers support to this device. It is not that developers hate 730 or that it is bad but they don't find enough reasons to buy devices with 730 because other better phones (overall) with the same price (or more affordable phones with similar performance but different SoC) exist.
omar20115 said:
Kindly don't leave samsung A71 users alone.we have to much hope and faith that the developers will be developing their ROMS for this device too.
Thanks
Regards
XDAFan
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol
---------- Post added at 06:28 AM ---------- Previous post was at 06:27 AM ----------
BeroNacci said:
Lol !
So what ? this device won't get root or even twrp ??
Do you mean that ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Twrp is pretty useless with nothing to flash with it
Root and twrpwould be superb.
Not useless, as you can flash mods, like screen bootlogo to hide boot locker warning for example.
I got rid of the s10 plus and got an A71.
Could not justify the pricetag and performance compared to the a71.
So sold on, and half of that money bought me the a71, happ days
Aslong as can root which is main thing, do some customisation's, i'm happy
I'd be willing to do a custom ROM release for the A71 if I knew where to start, I'm a developer but never worked on Android "ROMs" before.
My goal would be a clean stable version of the Stock OS with the Google/Pixel apps installed and the Samsung crud removed.
h8Aramex said:
If you check other 730 or 730G devices, you can quickly find two flaws.
- There are no roms or development whatsoever.
- The battery life / power usage of this specific chip is pretty bad.
It is rumored that the Pixel 4a (or XL?) will use a 730, so that may help, even though Pixel 3a has never had any rom development either really.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Check out poco x2/redmi k30 for more eye opening information....
h8Aramex said:
- There are no roms or development whatsoever.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's a real shame. Even debloated original rom would be great.
- The battery life / power usage of this specific chip is pretty bad.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Two days of normal usage (12-14h SOT) is not that bad. No gaming though.
Cyber Axe said:
I'd be willing to do a custom ROM release for the A71 if I knew where to start, I'm a developer but never worked on Android "ROMs" before.
My goal would be a clean stable version of the Stock OS with the Google/Pixel apps installed and the Samsung crud removed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You could maybe do something with gsi's? Optimise it for our device? Or maybe this tutorial can help you:
https://forum.xda-developers.com/an...g/guide-how-to-build-unsupported-rom-t3844972
h8Aramex said:
If you check other 730 or 730G devices, you can quickly find two flaws.
- There are no roms or development whatsoever.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wtf man haha just look at Realme X2, Xiaomi Mi 9T, Redmi K30...
joaocbbc said:
wtf man haha just look at Realme X2, Xiaomi Mi 9T, Redmi K30...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh wait, you replied to my three months old comment... okay.
So maybe my prediction was incorrect... I made a mistake... let's check: https://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-a71/development
Oh no.. I was 100% right. Dayum. Shame. Good try though.
(sorry for sarcasm but why reply like I messed up when my comment stood the test of time.. sadly. I wish these devices were supported, trust me.)
h8Aramex said:
Oh wait, you replied to my three months old comment... okay.
So maybe my prediction was incorrect... I made a mistake... let's check: https://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-a71/development
Oh no.. I was 100% right. Dayum. Shame. Good try though.
(sorry for sarcasm but why reply like I messed up when my comment stood the test of time.. sadly. I wish these devices were supported, trust me.)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey man, I didn't said you was wrong about that nor have I said that A71 has active developers right now. I just stated the fact that your affirmation that SD730(G) devices did not have ROMs or development was wrong. Just that. About the fact that A71 doesn't have ROMs or development, you're 100% right.
joaocbbc said:
Hey man, I didn't said you was wrong about that nor have I said that A71 has active developers right now. I just stated the fact that your affirmation that SD730(G) devices did not have ROMs or development was wrong. Just that. About the fact that A71 doesn't have ROMs or development, you're 100% right.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Uguys want to change this about a71?
If yes, please search for a71 development group in telegram. Step by step, every one can contribute to start decelopment. It will b extremely hard since most samsung snapdragon bssed devices released in 2019 and after will face lot of issues in sources and bug fixing. This is exactly how a70 decelopment started. It is still in a developingvphase. But because of contributions from every one and some exceptional devs like grarak, xtutorials etc.. a70 has an almost workable source to start with.
Lets see if a71 ysers are just as keen as a70 users to bring custom development for this device.
Joining the telegram group would be a start. We can coordinate from there on.
h8Aramex said:
Oh wait, you replied to my three months old comment... okay.
So maybe my prediction was incorrect... I made a mistake... let's check: https://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-a71/development
Oh no.. I was 100% right. Dayum. Shame. Good try though.
(sorry for sarcasm but why reply like I messed up when my comment stood the test of time.. sadly. I wish these devices were supported, trust me.)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Considering the amount of publicity this phone has been getting, it's just a matter of time.
Once there's proper source code for a ROM to be developed, you'll see ROMs being developed.
As it stands, the device is brand new, I mean come on it came out in January.
If my previous phone (Nokia 7 Plus) had custom ROMs despite not being able to unlock the bootloader for free because Nokia wouldn't let you, I doubt this phone won't get any ROMs.
has anyone tried any treble roms with this device?
Was going to say, the amount of publicity this phone has got and still going is up there with main flagship phones.
It is a cracking phone for sure, and would love like many, to have custom roms and further support for it.
We have to be patient, if it happens, all good, if not, it is what it is.
I guess the only bad thing is that there is no way around of not tripping Knox, despite it being a Qualcomm phone and not an Exynos phone.
So if you have insurance and/or warranty, you can kiss those two good bye the minute you decide to tamper with the bootloader.
isnt is possible to install AOSP GSI by phussion?
SURPRISE!
Hi guys, I am developer from Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, and interesting in development to this device.
Mine ideas for this device:
* Debloated stock - stock with trash app removed, added features and other optimizing.
* TWRP - rooting and flashing will be easier
* Custom ROMs - any description needed here?
And ofc we will try boot GSI (maybe sGSI too) for this device!
Stay tuned!
(1st debloated stock version will be evelible in few weeks)
---------- Post added at 04:56 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:55 PM ----------
brownah92 said:
isnt is possible to install AOSP GSI by phussion?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
should boot
---------- Post added at 04:57 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:56 PM ----------
brownah92 said:
isnt is possible to install AOSP GSI by phussion?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, GSI should boot here.
---------- Post added at 05:02 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:57 PM ----------
By the way, what do you guys think about making thread for this, so users will see something is happening, or this is too early?