Develop Bugs

Battery went from 100% to 36% in 2 hours...

So I picked up my phone to read a text. I hadn't used it all morning, and yet, my battery was at 36% and the phone was very warm. So I look at the battery stats and see this:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
4.0.5 can't come soon enough. Hopefully it will actually fix the dying radio issues.

You have 4g on.. that's why
Sent from my Samsung GNexus <3

WOW! what a drop!
What ROM, kernel and baseband are you using?
4G can't be the only reason for such big a drop!

Looks like the phone lost signal and never found it again... draining the battery by looking for the signal.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk

On 4g and no signal for two hours; it is actually amazing that there was still battery left.
Try a different radio?
Or, up the minimum frequency of the cpu to 700Mhz (in case you have an extreme variant of the 4.0.4 bug).

Hardly surprising. Something is keeping your phone awake, probable the radio trying to connect to a network for over 2 h. A phone trying to connect without success for 2 h gets pretty warm, even more so on 4G and drains your battery quickly.

Look at your signal its horrible! And 2 hours screen on time.. Your par for the course.

WiredPirate said:
Look at your signal its horrible! And 2 hours screen on time.. Your par for the course.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
His screen was barely on. The 2 hours was his phone trying to get signal.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA

arzbhatia said:
WOW! what a drop!
What ROM, kernel and baseband are you using?
4G can't be the only reason for such big a drop!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AOKP build 29, Franco Kernel milestone 2, and one of the hybrid radios(I believe 4.0.2 and 4.0.3).
The drop is definitely from the phone losing signal and searching for it that whole time, as evidenced by the network signal being red and the phone being awake.

WiredPirate said:
Look at your signal its horrible! And 2 hours screen on time.. Your par for the course.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here, in my house, my signal averages -80 dbm. The screen wasn't on for more than a few minutes. The radio simply lost signal and kept the phone awake trying to find one.

Vangelis13 said:
On 4g and no signal for two hours; it is actually amazing that there was still battery left.
Try a different radio?
Or, up the minimum frequency of the cpu to 700Mhz (in case you have an extreme variant of the 4.0.4 bug).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I DO have the CPU minimum at 700 mhz
I'll go to build 30 with a different kernel and baseband and see if this keeps up.

You are using a 4.0.3 radio for a 4.0.4 rom; upgrade to this radio & bootloader:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1571715

Vangelis13 said:
You are using a 4.0.3 radio for a 4.0.4 rom; upgrade to this radio & bootloader:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1571715
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My radio dropping issues were even worse on the 4.0.4 radios. But it can't hurt to try again.

times_infinity said:
His screen was barely on. The 2 hours was his phone trying to get signal.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your right. My mistake.

ray3andrei said:
You have 4g on.. that's why
Sent from my Samsung GNexus <3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've had this happen before when the network was set to CDMA only. It was only once though... My phone is completely stock and I can't wait for the update to hopefully resolve these problems. Otherwise I will have to start requesting replacements until I get a good one.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA

ray3andrei said:
You have 4g on.. that's why
Sent from my Samsung GNexus <3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No it isn't.
The phone couldn't find a signal and was constantly searching.

SnrSuave said:
I've had this happen before when the network was set to CDMA only. It was only once though... My phone is completely stock and I can't wait for the update to hopefully resolve these problems. Otherwise I will have to start requesting replacements until I get a good one.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah. Since 4.0.5 is rumored to fix it, I'm holding out. I've had all sorts of issues with replacements, and my current phone is perfect except for the radios, which is hopefully just a software issue. Anyways, it's better now that I've wiped and everything, but it still drops. So I'm gonna try different basebands again.

WiredPirate said:
Your right. My mistake.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What about "his right"? Or do you mean "you're"?
Anyway, try the GladOS kernel. Honestly, Franco's Kernel was amazing a couple of months ago, nowadays.. not so much. I had a big increase in both performance and battery life with GladOS.

hi !
I also have this kind of battery drain... but I don't have 4G, my GN is GSM...
And the battery is draining with airplane mode on.. I'v made a lot of searches and still can't find the source of my problem

How's the FD26 modem performing for you?

I just downloaded it and wondering what other user experiences are out there.

I am running my tests today.. I will post my results here..
sj
Sent from my sgs2e4gt on AoKPb34 FD24/FD26 on TabletUI @ 128 dpi aOS 4.0.4 using [email protected] 2 Beta 6

Tapatalk, as usual, is being a pita. First two are FD19. Second two are FD26.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
.
.
.
.
EDIT
Now quickpic and imgur for android aren't cooperating and had to do it slightly different.
So far, speed is slightly better. I didn't pay any attention to signal strength levels. Will have to run for a day or two so I can see how it behaves in different areas near me. I'm running calkulin 2.8.1 and the kernel that came with it. Also have no frills CPU set at 1200 200 ondemand cfq.

4G works pretty well on the new modem, here in Philadelphia, indoors.
Sent from my calculator watch.

Tits
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium

kingdazy said:
4G works pretty well on the new modem, here in Philadelphia, indoors.
Sent from my calculator watch.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's actually pretty bad for 4G. That download speed is what would be expected of a 'good' 3G connection, in the areas where Sprint has upgraded backhaul.

dmchssc said:
That's actually pretty bad for 4G. That download speed is what would be expected of a 'good' 3G connection, in the areas where Sprint has upgraded backhaul.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Srsly? 12Mbps is barely acceptable?
EDIT: thanks, sfhub. I understand those concepts well enough, I enter just actually never bothered to check what "good" 4G speed should actually be.
Maybe I should look into that, lol.
Sent from my calculator watch.

Things are relative. A modem is not going to make a bad area all of a sudden better. The problem with most Sprint areas which have speed issues is the backhaul is overloaded. So as an analogy, a new wifi driver is not going to suddenly make your DSL WAN connection turn into a FIOS connection. If it doesn't make your connection worse or things are slightly better, than that should be a sign of good things for most people. You want the radio to allow you the full potential that is available *in your area*. The radio isn't going fix endemic problems in your area, you just want it to not make things worse.

sfhub said:
Things are relative. A modem is not going to make a bad area all of a sudden better. The problem with most Sprint areas which have speed issues is the backhaul is overloaded. So as an analogy, a new wifi driver is not going to suddenly make your DSL WAN connection turn into a FIOS connection. If it doesn't make your connection worse are is slightly better, than that should be a sign of good things for most people. You want the radio to allow you the full potential that is available *in your area*. The radio isn't going fix endemic problems in your area, you just want it to not make things worse.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for that SF, you make everything as easy to understand as possible!
sj
Sent from my sgs2e4gt on AoKPb34 FD24/FD26 on TabletUI @ 128 dpi aOS 4.0.4 using [email protected] 2 Beta 6

Srsly? 12Mbps is barely acceptable?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That screenshot shows 1.5 mbps...

KB/s not kbps. big difference.

Damn, that was a good run while stopped at a light.

dmchssc said:
That screenshot shows 1.5 mbps...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
kB/s.
kilobytes not bits.

I just tested FD26 modem after flashing the FD26 kernel in my rom update.. well.. this modem is BY FAR the fastest and most stable yet.. (on my device) in a test spot where I was consistently getting .58 or so MB/s, I am getting .92 or so MB/s. This is a significant increase.
sj
Sent from my sgs2e4gt on AoKPm5 FD26 aOS 4.0.4 using [email protected] 2 Beta 6

How come i can't update my profile or PRL? Keeps saying error....
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium

What I do is reboot to recovery, clear cache and dalvik, flash modem, reboot, update profile then prl then reboot. Sometimes you need to try again on profile/prl. If it doesn't take by the third time then something isn't right. I don't know how to fix that either.

I have been getting pretty good speeds on FD26, however, I started getting frequent LOS today. Was at a music festival earlier, and thought it may be an issue with overloaded towers, but it just LOS'd again at home. I haven't had an LOS issue since pre EL29. Flashed to FB24 a few days ago, then FB26 (nodata) yesterday. Considering doing a full wipe and reflash to see if it cures the issue.

gershee said:
kB/s.
kilobytes not bits.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oops, my bad. I'm used to seeing speeds in bit-terms.

I like it. Smooth overall, i have no major complaints. I have noticed areas where i normally have minimal service, i now have none, and my 3g speeds are terrible. However sprint is also doing some major overhauling, so im going to blame sprint. Ive compared my phone to my wifes stock el29, and i think each user will have a different feel towards things. I love the lockscreens and smoother transitions fd26 has, but i think in my area staying stock is in my best benefit as far as service goes....Looks like if i want my service back i might have to go back to el29. SFHUB, do you think its possible that maybe all the sprint network changes could be the reason for my bad 3g data speeds and poor connections? My wifes phone see's 3g and shows it, maybe 1 or 2 bars, and i show none....however she cant browse online or do anything...just make a phone call....i can do that to....what do u think? I formatted all and did a fresh flash from el29 to fd26 btw....(also im in niles,IL and chicago,IL)

If your wife's e4gt gets signal, then it is probably the modem/kernel in FD26 causing you issues. Also check to see if they are on the same PRL and try update profile.
If that doesn't help, try ##72786# reset from the dialer, you'll need your MSL which you can get using "getprop ril.MSL" in adb shell.

[Q] Unstable 5GHz

I'm having issues with my GNex on 5GHz networks. The networks drop out and are generally unstable. It is not the networks themselves that are unstable, as the signal is rock stable on nearby laptops.
The blue line is the 5GHz network. It is the only 5GHz network within range, so interference is unlikely to be the issue. This router is a WNDR4000, which is pretty much rock solid on both frequencies. The 5GHz network is on channel 48, no automatic channel setup.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Anyone know what might be the issue? Is 5Ghz working fine for others? Is my HW broken?
(I'll be pretty pissed if my HW is broken TBH. I got it back from its third service today...)

There is a hardware issue with 5GHz WiFi on the Galaxy Nexus. I can only connect to 5GHz WiFi networks if I am standing directly next to the router. There is a thread regarding this issue.

Mine is brand new and it does it.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

Welcome to the Galaxy Nexus. Just pretend it never had 5ghz support, you'll be far happier for it. My 5ghz up and stopped working entirely when the phone was only a month or so old. 2.4 is still going strong, although at lower speeds then any other device connected to it. Samsung put a real joke of a wifi chip in this phone.

reading the title i thought sum1 used liquid nitrogen and overclocked our cortex A-9 to 5 Ghz dam m disappointed

My Nexus must be defective. I'm hooked to a 5Ghz network without issues.

Did you pay attention during Physics class?
Higher frequencies will not penetrate things like walls or yourself as good as lower frequencies, think 800MHz and 2.4GHz WiFi, the cell tower obviously can penetrate buildings better. Just you turning away from the router can make the bars drop a bar or 2.

Mach3.2 said:
Did you pay attention during Physics class?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, I did. Did you pay attention to what I wrote? Using my laptop in the same location, I get >20MB/s speeds on 5GHz without a hitch and the signal is rock steady.
We're talking line of sight, 3-4 meters of air. Not really something that 5GHz should have trouble penetrating.

repvik said:
Yes, I did. Did you pay attention to what I wrote? Using my laptop in the same location, I get >20MB/s speeds on 5GHz without a hitch and the signal is rock steady.
We're talking line of sight, 3-4 meters of air. Not really something that 5GHz should have trouble penetrating.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then disregard what i said, i'm just trying to say that just turning your body can make your signal drop.
And you can't compare a "high powered" card in your laptop to the one in your phone..

Mach3.2 said:
Then disregard what i said, i'm just trying to say that just turning your body can make your signal drop.
And you can't compare a "high powered" card in your laptop to the one in your phone..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, actually I can. Monitoring the signal on my laptop shows a rock solid signal. Pretty much anywhere in the house actually.
So the signal in itself is good and stable. Now, I expect the reception to be somewhat worse on the GNex due to antenna limitations and space restrictions for the tranciever. However, I can still expect a signal that doesn't go completely dead for 5-20 seconds at a time while being in the same room as the router. My One X does not have these dropouts, I only experience these with the GNex.
I don't expect even half the speed or reception compared to my laptop, but I expect the signal to be somewhat stable on the GNex when there are no issues on the laptop.

repvik said:
Well, actually I can. Monitoring the signal on my laptop shows a rock solid signal. Pretty much anywhere in the house actually.
So the signal in itself is good and stable. Now, I expect the reception to be somewhat worse on the GNex due to antenna limitations and space restrictions for the tranciever. However, I can still expect a signal that doesn't go completely dead for 5-20 seconds at a time while being in the same room as the router. My One X does not have these dropouts, I only experience these with the GNex.
I don't expect even half the speed or reception compared to my laptop, but I expect the signal to be somewhat stable on the GNex when there are no issues on the laptop.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Comparing the gnex to the one x is fine, but to a laptop is a big no no. Laptops have more power to the wlan card, not to mention it have more antenna than the gnex. If it works fine on the one x, then yes, the gnex have problems.
Will the next nexus have a longer screen?

Mach3.2 said:
Comparing the gnex to the one x is fine, but to a laptop is a big no no. Laptops have more power to the wlan card, not to mention it have more antenna han the gnex.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The laptop is my "baseline", verifying that the signal is on and stable 100% percent of the time. The amount of power is of little importance, since we're only talking recieving, not transmitting. The signal won't be as good as the laptop due to the antennas (as I already pointed out. Did you read what I wrote?), but I should be able to compare the stability of the signal. And it's definitely not good.

Why do you even need 5ghz?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app

akira02rex said:
Why do you even need 5ghz?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because not all locations I visit have 2,4GHz. And 5GHz is much less crowded than 2,4GHz. Infact, at home, there are no other 5GHz networks at all.

akira02rex said:
Why do you even need 5ghz?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because it's in the phone. And what OP pointed out.

Mach3.2 said:
Because it's in the phone. And what OP pointed out.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's an even better reason. I paid for it
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Mach3.2 said:
Did you pay attention during Physics class?
Higher frequencies will not penetrate things like walls or yourself as good as lower frequencies, think 800MHz and 2.4GHz WiFi, the cell tower obviously can penetrate buildings better. Just you turning away from the router can make the bars drop a bar or 2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Instead being a total idiot, try taking a better approach next time. Not everyone pays every small detail like you in physics class, and neither everyone goes around trolling forums for physics classes.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2

FromiOSToAndroid said:
Instead being a total ..., try taking a better approach next time. Not everyone pays every small detail like you in physics class, and neither everyone goes around trolling forums for physics classes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You aren't exactly helping yourself, are you? Except for the first line, his post is informative and to the point. There's no need to resort to name-calling.

[MAY BE SOLVED] H+ (HSPAP) not working with CM 10.1

Hey guys,
I just installed CM10.1 (official release!) onto my i9195. But now I can't get my H+-connection, which I had with the stock rom. I do get normal H-connection though. Don't know about LTE.
And it is not true, that H+ just doesn't get shown. It says "HSPA:10" in the Settings>Status-menu
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
. I do get a H+-connection with a tablet which runs CM 10.1 as well (Says "HSPAP:15" here)!
What can I do? / Is it a known problem with that phone or CM in general? (didn't find any information about it)
I did a pretty clean install with a full wipe, I think.

karlo12 said:
Hey guys,
I just installed CM10.1 (official release!) onto my i9195. But now I can't get my H+-connection, which I had with the stock rom. I do get normal H-connection though. Don't know about LTE.
And it is not true, that H+ just doesn't get shown. It says "HSPA:10" in the Settings>Status-menu View attachment 2290923. I do get a H+-connection with a tablet which runs CM 10.1 as well (Says "HSPAP:15" here)!
What can I do? / Is it a known problem with that phone or CM in general? (didn't find any information about it)
I did a pretty clean install with a full wipe, I think.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you run speedtest? What kind of speeds do you get?
For me it also shows only H but I know I have H+ in my contract and get H+ speeds with speed test, according to this page: http://www.clove.co.uk/viewtechnicalinformation.aspx?content=3B2BD491-6465-4C70-ABDB-5A12A06C3D8D
E: Screenshot from a speedtest run yesterday.

Thanks for the quick answer!
I do get 7,2 Mbps downstream and 1,5 Mbps upstream. The downstream at least is exactly what I should get with normal HSPA, so no indication of HSPAP here...
And you are at the same CM-Version (latest stable release, CM 1.1.3) and got the same model (i9195) and followed the wiki-install-instructions??!
Mhhh.. What does it say for you in the settings>status menu as "network type"? "HSPAP:15", I guess?

I am using 10.1.3 stable and have H+ and DC where I am all the time.

This is actually quite a strange issue. I've never been able to get H+ or LTE in CyanogenMod, despite being able to in stock rom. I see people from other countries/carriers do get it, so it would suggest there's some differences at play here.

karlo12 said:
Thanks for the quick answer!
I do get 7,2 Mbps downstream and 1,5 Mbps upstream. The downstream at least is exactly what I should get with normal HSPA, so no indication of HSPAP here...
And you are at the same CM-Version (latest stable release, CM 1.1.3) and got the same model (i9195) and followed the wiki-install-instructions??!
Mhhh.. What does it say for you in the settings>status menu as "network type"? "HSPAP:15", I guess?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes running 10.1.3, installed within 15 minutes after getting the phone, only thing I did when it was still stock was to make sure it really is i9195 as it didnt say it on the box.
My status is saying that my network is HSPA:10
Sent from my GT-I9195 using Tapatalk 2

labbe- said:
Yes running 10.1.3, installed within 15 minutes after getting the phone, only thing I did when it was still stock was to make sure it really is i9195 as it didnt say it on the box.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
just like me
My status is saying that my network is HSPA:10
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
starting to get some hope here. I will run some speedtests now and give some feedback. Any other help would be appreciated anyways

Whosat said:
I am using 10.1.3 stable and have H+ and DC where I am all the time.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mhh, may be a problem with Vodafone germany then. I'm just wondering why it does work with my galaxy tab and the same SIM-card and CM installed.
Could I need a radio- or baseband- or kernel-update or smth? But as I said, I had H+ with the stock rom ...
//Update:
I've been running some speedtest in a large city, but I allwayas only get ab out 7,2 Mbps downstream.
As it works with the oher device (tablet), I assume that the CM-version may be bricked in that radio-regard, despite runnig like a charm in any other regard.

Just tested with my Lumia 920 with the same SIM and it's showing H+ and getting same speeds as the S4 Mini, so in my case it seems the icon is only showing the wrong network type but the speed is there...
Maybe if you updated your modem and RIL? Here is the stock ROM thread for out device and there is a German vodafone version. Try grabbing the modem and RIL from there and flash it over to your CM install. Unfortunately I don't know how to do it, just a suggestion. :good:

labbe- said:
Just tested with my Lumia 920 with the same SIM and it's showing H+ and getting same speeds as the S4 Mini, so in my case it seems the icon is only showing the wrong network type but the speed is there...
Maybe if you updated your modem and RIL? Here is the stock ROM thread for out device and there is a German vodafone version. Try grabbing the modem and RIL from there and flash it over to your CM install. Unfortunately I don't know how to do it, just a suggestion. :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for all that effort, first of all! Saw that thread before, but didn't notice the Vodafone version. I guess, I might give it a shot. RIL is just a software-layer in the OS, according to wikipedia. I shouldn't be able to totally brick my phone, right? Would ofc rather stay on normal HSPA
//another small update:
I just found out that I own a device with a french country region-code (XEF). May that be a reason?

Last thought for today: I have to test internet-speed with my tablet, which shows the H+-icon. If it doesn't get over 7,2 mbit, things doesn't matter anyways Than it is maybe just my contract with Vodafone which keeps speed from getting higher. And I'm a moron, then My assumption, that, if my device shows a H+-icon it is surfing with more than 7,2 Mbps all the time would have been wrong and I think that's quite possible.
Will keep you guys updated...

Yeah, I don't get higher speeds at the moment with my tablet, so my contract seems to limit it to 7,2 Mbps, which I wasn't aware of. So it might be the case, just as described by labbe-, that I could get higher speeds, though my device doesn't show the H+-icon :silly: I would call this a little bug in CM and hope, that it gets sort out anytime. I stop further investigations here for the moment, as I don't want to change my contract with Vodafone.
Thanks for the help. Does CM 10.3 come for the i9195? I'd love to see it :fingers-crossed:

karlo12 said:
Yeah, I don't get higher speeds at the moment with my tablet, so my contract seems to limit it to 7,2 Mbps, which I wasn't aware of. So it might be the case, just as described by labbe-, that I could get higher speeds, though my device doesn't show the H+-icon :silly: I would call this a little bug in CM and hope, that it gets sort out anytime. I stop further investigations here for the moment, as I don't want to change my contract with Vodafone.
Thanks for the help. Does CM 10.3 come for the i9195? I'd love to see it :fingers-crossed:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Now that i recall it will show H+ regardless of the max speed, I remember my old SGS3 i9300 with my old contract showing that even though it was capped to 1Mbps, so that definently explains that =)
iirc they fixed the signal indicator in CM10 for that device though, don't know why it's not working for our device or the state of i9300 at the moment. To be honest, I actually prefer the static H rather than it jumping between 3G, H and H+ depending on my location and signal strenght
Someone just said posted back in the discussion thread they are running 10.2 and will upload it later today. Apparently the camera doesn't work yet though, so I'd be careful with that. Personally I'm going to wait for official M milestone build.

Benchmark too low on custom ROMs.

Antutu benchmark is too low on zuk z2 custom roms ???
Lineage OS with its default kernel- 56k
RR-official - 113k
Lineage OS with UBERTC Kernel - 107k
Can anyone provide fix for this problem.
Tested in antutu 6.2.7.

I don't have that problem - get around 140k on LineageOS with default kernel. Did you do a full wipe before installing?

Why do you care about benchmarks?

Did, even formatted the data but still the same problem.
But this problem is not there on officially ROM.
Does this has to do something with antutu as antutu has some benchmark loss issues.?

Can anyone fix this problem?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

is the phone really hot before you start the benchmark?
to get the best results the phone should be cold (like 30ºC or less) when you start the test. if you try to do a benchmark after another benchmark test, you'll only get worse results than the previous one due to thermal throttling. the same happens after you leave a game and try to do a benchmark.
getting less than 120k is really strange and I disagree with the guy that said "why do you care about benchmark" because getting 70k when you should be getting at least 120k shows a problem. Here on Lineage I was getting 144k with the device cold (24ºC) before the test.

Thought of that too, for that I kept the phone in fridge for some time to cool it down but still the max I could get was 114k.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B28Cgdz_tgfucjN4Mm0zX1ktR2s/view?usp=drivesdk
Tested when phone was idle

Did your z2 came with shoprom? If yes what rom did you flashed after shoprom?

No, I bought it from eBay.in and updated it to zui 2.3 on the same day then to zui 2.5.344 when the update was released.
On zui 2.5.344 it scores 134k.

voske15 said:
No, I bought it from eBay.in and updated it to zui 2.3 on the same day then to zui 2.5.344 when the update was released.
On zui 2.5.344 it scores 134k.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you try to go back to stock with 1.9.044 qpst/qfil no miflash or something, update to latest, unlock bootloader again etc. and then try again with benchmarks?

Since OP isn't getting the point. Benchmarks DON'T MATTER. Why do you care about scores when your phone performs as expected. By complaining like this, you are just discouraging new users

Have a look on kernel adiutor and see what frequencies your CPU is getting. Also check if battery mode is set to Balanced. If not, set it and try again.

Subhrajyoti Sen said:
Since OP isn't getting the point. Benchmarks DON'T MATTER. Why do you care about scores when your phone performs as expected. By complaining like this, you are just discouraging new users
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe because benchmarks evaluate the performance of the whole system? If he's getting less than the half of the normal score another one gets, theres something not right with his system.
Oh.. oh.. oh.. yeah please dont post if you got problems, new users could be discouraged...
If you have not contributed something useful, go out of this thread. Thanks!

Lacce said:
Maybe because benchmarks evaluate the performance of the whole system? If he's getting less than the half of the normal score another one gets, theres something not right with his system.
Oh.. oh.. oh.. yeah please dont post if you got problems, new users could be discouraged...
If you have not contributed something useful, go out of this thread. Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not trying to be rude. The benchmarks are highly context dependent. They should ideally be done on a clean installation and on minimal installation. You can make some small changes while Compiling the kernel and benchmarks can be drastically changed even though actual real world performance doesn't seem to differ. And there are already too many users judging custom ROMs by the benchmarks. I've seen first hand how many users are reluctant to use kernels coz someone complained about benchmarks even though they loved the kernel later. That's all I meant. And before you think I'm a forum troll, please so check that I actually help our people and contribute to development too

Reverted back to zui 2.5.334 then benchmarked the phone, 134k. Updated the baseband(2.0.c1.9) then again did the test with same scores. After that installed the latest official RR ROM (090517) with darkmoon kernel v3 longtap then benchmarked again but still the same results.
Gonna try with official rr's stock kernel today, then will report.

Subhrajyoti Sen said:
Not trying to be rude. The benchmarks are highly context dependent. They should ideally be done on a clean installation and on minimal installation. You can make some small changes while Compiling the kernel and benchmarks can be drastically changed even though actual real world performance doesn't seem to differ. And there are already too many users judging custom ROMs by the benchmarks. I've seen first hand how many users are reluctant to use kernels coz someone complained about benchmarks even though they loved the kernel later. That's all I meant. And before you think I'm a forum troll, please so check that I actually help our people and contribute to development too
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No offence, these were only clear words for your post which help the threadstarter in no case. In first post he said 56k on lineage with default kernel and that's not normal.
Yes, he could do something wrong. But he open the thread to find a solution or whats the mistake of this low benchmarks.
I think everyone would worry about if he gets 56k and others >140k. Wouldnt you think that theres something wrong with your phone?
So help find the error/mistake but with "live with that" you do not
---------- Post added at 05:51 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:49 PM ----------
voske15 said:
Reverted back to zui 2.5.334 then benchmarked the phone, 134k. Updated the baseband(2.0.c1.9) then again did the test with same scores. After that installed the latest official RR ROM (090517) with darkmoon kernel v3 longtap then benchmarked again but still the same results.
Gonna try with official rr's stock kernel today, then will report.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You reverted with qpst/qfil? Changing between custom roms with twrp is no solution qpst/qfil gets deeper into firmware.

Can anyone provide ZUI 2.5.334 qpst/qfile link?

voske15 said:
Reverted back to zui 2.5.334 then benchmarked the phone, 134k. Updated the baseband(2.0.c1.9) then again did the test with same scores. After that installed the latest official RR ROM (090517) with darkmoon kernel v3 longtap then benchmarked again but still the same results.
Gonna try with official rr's stock kernel today, then will report.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
134K is perfectly normal. That's how much I was getting on RR with stock clocks. OC I'm getting 154K. Also darkmoon v3 is a very good kernel. Tested it with no problems. Remember that a clean flash is always best.

Not on official RR, only 113k with darkmoon kernel