Antutu benchmark is too low on zuk z2 custom roms ???
Lineage OS with its default kernel- 56k
RR-official - 113k
Lineage OS with UBERTC Kernel - 107k
Can anyone provide fix for this problem.
Tested in antutu 6.2.7.
I don't have that problem - get around 140k on LineageOS with default kernel. Did you do a full wipe before installing?
Why do you care about benchmarks?
Did, even formatted the data but still the same problem.
But this problem is not there on officially ROM.
Does this has to do something with antutu as antutu has some benchmark loss issues.?
Can anyone fix this problem?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
is the phone really hot before you start the benchmark?
to get the best results the phone should be cold (like 30ºC or less) when you start the test. if you try to do a benchmark after another benchmark test, you'll only get worse results than the previous one due to thermal throttling. the same happens after you leave a game and try to do a benchmark.
getting less than 120k is really strange and I disagree with the guy that said "why do you care about benchmark" because getting 70k when you should be getting at least 120k shows a problem. Here on Lineage I was getting 144k with the device cold (24ºC) before the test.
Thought of that too, for that I kept the phone in fridge for some time to cool it down but still the max I could get was 114k.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B28Cgdz_tgfucjN4Mm0zX1ktR2s/view?usp=drivesdk
Tested when phone was idle
Did your z2 came with shoprom? If yes what rom did you flashed after shoprom?
No, I bought it from eBay.in and updated it to zui 2.3 on the same day then to zui 2.5.344 when the update was released.
On zui 2.5.344 it scores 134k.
voske15 said:
No, I bought it from eBay.in and updated it to zui 2.3 on the same day then to zui 2.5.344 when the update was released.
On zui 2.5.344 it scores 134k.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you try to go back to stock with 1.9.044 qpst/qfil no miflash or something, update to latest, unlock bootloader again etc. and then try again with benchmarks?
Since OP isn't getting the point. Benchmarks DON'T MATTER. Why do you care about scores when your phone performs as expected. By complaining like this, you are just discouraging new users
Have a look on kernel adiutor and see what frequencies your CPU is getting. Also check if battery mode is set to Balanced. If not, set it and try again.
Subhrajyoti Sen said:
Since OP isn't getting the point. Benchmarks DON'T MATTER. Why do you care about scores when your phone performs as expected. By complaining like this, you are just discouraging new users
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe because benchmarks evaluate the performance of the whole system? If he's getting less than the half of the normal score another one gets, theres something not right with his system.
Oh.. oh.. oh.. yeah please dont post if you got problems, new users could be discouraged...
If you have not contributed something useful, go out of this thread. Thanks!
Lacce said:
Maybe because benchmarks evaluate the performance of the whole system? If he's getting less than the half of the normal score another one gets, theres something not right with his system.
Oh.. oh.. oh.. yeah please dont post if you got problems, new users could be discouraged...
If you have not contributed something useful, go out of this thread. Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not trying to be rude. The benchmarks are highly context dependent. They should ideally be done on a clean installation and on minimal installation. You can make some small changes while Compiling the kernel and benchmarks can be drastically changed even though actual real world performance doesn't seem to differ. And there are already too many users judging custom ROMs by the benchmarks. I've seen first hand how many users are reluctant to use kernels coz someone complained about benchmarks even though they loved the kernel later. That's all I meant. And before you think I'm a forum troll, please so check that I actually help our people and contribute to development too
Reverted back to zui 2.5.334 then benchmarked the phone, 134k. Updated the baseband(2.0.c1.9) then again did the test with same scores. After that installed the latest official RR ROM (090517) with darkmoon kernel v3 longtap then benchmarked again but still the same results.
Gonna try with official rr's stock kernel today, then will report.
Subhrajyoti Sen said:
Not trying to be rude. The benchmarks are highly context dependent. They should ideally be done on a clean installation and on minimal installation. You can make some small changes while Compiling the kernel and benchmarks can be drastically changed even though actual real world performance doesn't seem to differ. And there are already too many users judging custom ROMs by the benchmarks. I've seen first hand how many users are reluctant to use kernels coz someone complained about benchmarks even though they loved the kernel later. That's all I meant. And before you think I'm a forum troll, please so check that I actually help our people and contribute to development too
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No offence, these were only clear words for your post which help the threadstarter in no case. In first post he said 56k on lineage with default kernel and that's not normal.
Yes, he could do something wrong. But he open the thread to find a solution or whats the mistake of this low benchmarks.
I think everyone would worry about if he gets 56k and others >140k. Wouldnt you think that theres something wrong with your phone?
So help find the error/mistake but with "live with that" you do not
---------- Post added at 05:51 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:49 PM ----------
voske15 said:
Reverted back to zui 2.5.334 then benchmarked the phone, 134k. Updated the baseband(2.0.c1.9) then again did the test with same scores. After that installed the latest official RR ROM (090517) with darkmoon kernel v3 longtap then benchmarked again but still the same results.
Gonna try with official rr's stock kernel today, then will report.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You reverted with qpst/qfil? Changing between custom roms with twrp is no solution qpst/qfil gets deeper into firmware.
Can anyone provide ZUI 2.5.334 qpst/qfile link?
voske15 said:
Reverted back to zui 2.5.334 then benchmarked the phone, 134k. Updated the baseband(2.0.c1.9) then again did the test with same scores. After that installed the latest official RR ROM (090517) with darkmoon kernel v3 longtap then benchmarked again but still the same results.
Gonna try with official rr's stock kernel today, then will report.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
134K is perfectly normal. That's how much I was getting on RR with stock clocks. OC I'm getting 154K. Also darkmoon v3 is a very good kernel. Tested it with no problems. Remember that a clean flash is always best.
Not on official RR, only 113k with darkmoon kernel
Related
NB! This tests are old! For newer results please follow the link:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=700755
---
Hello all,
Since there are so many flavours of ROMs around, I decided to do a little test with some of them (in my opinion, the more popular ones).
For the test I used the following ROMs:
2.1 Eclair
BeHero 1.3.2
Legendary 1.3.5
aHero 0.6.1
aHero 0.7.1
aHero 0.8
Villain 4.0 beta 2
Villain 5.02
Villain 5.1
Villain 5.2
Villain 5.3
Villain 5.4
CyanogenMod for Hero 1.0
Defiance 2.1
Androbin 1.1110
Legendroid 1.0.1
NeoRom 2.1
Raidroid 1.1
SlideVillain 1.0.1 beta
VanillaEclair 1.3 NAS
---
1.5 Cupcake
Kimera 1.7 @ 768MHz
Also the following for benchmarking:
For 3D Performance
Qualcomm's "NeoCore" 1.9.18 - Measured in FPS
For 2D Performance
Softweg's "Benchmark" 1.03 - Measured by an internal score
For CPU Performance
Linpack for Android - Measured in MFLOPS
All the tests mean: The higher, the better.
The method of testing was the usual flashing, a couple of reboots to make sure every caching necessary was done and the average of 3 benchmark of each test.
----
Here are the results from this first batch of ROM's:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Don't forget that benchmarks for newer ROM's can be followed here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=700755
---
Also remember that this tests are solely to measure the 2D/3D performance of a ROM, what in no way can be used to measure if a ROM is better or worse then another. It's only for games and overall "snappiness".
Bye
Hey. Thanks for the comparisons. This is very useful.
I have always said that BeHero was the best 2.1 ROM. It is very quick.
Villian was always the slowest for me but had more 'fixes' and features (just as google voice search).
I am currently running Legendary 1.3.5 (the 'upgrade' to BeHero...), which is as good as its predecessor.
Rep +1
jUsT2eXy said:
I am currently running Legendary 1.3.5 (the 'upgrade' to BeHero...), which is as good as its predecessor.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
According to the post you replied to, it is not as good as its predecessor when it comes to OpenGL performance - I would say it comes at an overall third place in that list.
That said, I wonder whether this should be taken as a measure for performance of a ROM.
Does OpenGL affect performance of the entire device? Or just, as I suspect, those processes which can make use of it - some games perhaps?
naenee said:
According to the post you replied to, it is not as good as its predecessor when it comes to OpenGL performance - I would say it comes at an overall third place in that list.
That said, I wonder whether this should be taken as a measure for performance of a ROM.
Does OpenGL affect performance of the entire device? Or just, as I suspect, those processes which can make use of it - some games perhaps?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi. Yeah I did read the post I replied to and saw that Legendary came 3rd. But in fact, well in my opinion it is a better performer than its predecessor contrary to the benchmark statistics above.
To me, it feels snappier. Though the stats. say differently.
Just like a car might feel faster than the car you previously drove, but in fact it is not... if that makes sense lol...
where can i download Legendary 1.3.5 ?? i recently flashed my Hero but I do not know which ROM to use for the best.. all I want is a smooth, not sticky ROM which will enable me to use my phone without it freezing... I just dont know where to get the ROM's or which one to go for,,,, can someone PLEASE help me..... thanks
Just tested vanillain rom hybrid 1.0 (fresh install)
NeoCore without sound: 29 fps
Neocore with sound: 25 fps
Ian_4614 said:
where can i download Legendary 1.3.5 ?? i recently flashed my Hero but I do not know which ROM to use for the best.. all I want is a smooth, not sticky ROM which will enable me to use my phone without it freezing... I just dont know where to get the ROM's or which one to go for,,,, can someone PLEASE help me..... thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
google is your friend.
Here is the direct link
Here is the google link. It is much easier to google it than wait for a reply...
http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=Le...s=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&client=firefox-a
thanks good thread up
Added CyanogenMod for Hero v1.0
i am really sorry to sound like such a noob,, but what does that mean ?????
Ian_4614 said:
i am really sorry to sound like such a noob,, but what does that mean ?????
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hello,
I'm doing this tests for my own pleasure since I like measuring performance and I saw a good opportunity here and for the moment I have some spare time
Anyway, this tests compare the 2D/3D performance across the different ROMs available for the users in this forums. For some people this might be important, like for me, since I have quite a few games in my Hero. Also it's important for people that cannot stand "lagginess" or "sluggishness" (I don't have a clue how to spell that...) in your home screen and/or browsing the ROM
Added Androbin 1.1110 & Defiance 2.1
Villain 3.4
NeoCore (with sound): 24.6
NeoCore (without sound): 29.9
Softweg (GPU test): 120
Favour
Could you do me a favour and chuck in a 1.5 ROM just for a sense of comparison, such as mr.bang performance rom. Just want to see how much of a 'gain' we get in terms of visuals from the switch to 2.1 if any at all, thanks
You should add Kagu Droid with JIT to the test.
Arkymedes said:
Added Androbin 1.1110 & Defiance 2.1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Could you pls add Villain 5.1 pls?
Hi,
I'm trying to add the most number of ROMs possible and about the cupcake version, it's not possible since NeoCore doesn't run
But yes, I would love to check the performance between them.
Re: [Benchmark] 3D/OpenGL performance across ROMs
Ahh thats a shame. In that case could legendroid be uploaded please, i can a few tests and i think it could beat behero!
Sent from my Hero using the XDA mobile application powered by Tapatalk
bratfink said:
Could you do me a favour and chuck in a 1.5 ROM just for a sense of comparison, such as mr.bang performance rom. Just want to see how much of a 'gain' we get in terms of visuals from the switch to 2.1 if any at all, thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mr Bang concept 2.0 gets 29FPS without sound.
Arkymedes said:
Hello,
I'm doing this tests for my own pleasure since I like measuring performance and I saw a good opportunity here and for the moment I have some spare time
Anyway, this tests compare the 2D/3D performance across the different ROMs available for the users in this forums. For some people this might be important, like for me, since I have quite a few games in my Hero. Also it's important for people that cannot stand "lagginess" or "sluggishness" (I don't have a clue how to spell that...) in your home screen and/or browsing the ROM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you sure OpenGL is used outside of apps/games specifically written to make use of it?
Hi.
I'm have now rewritten the Spreadsheet and will shortly be integrating my CPU benchmarks and GPU benchmarks into the same sheet (not really that interesting or anything but it's there if you want to see exactly how things are worked out) but it explains why the progress has been slow recently. I have now taken this thread over from Arkymedes - and a HUGE thanks to him for creating the spreadsheet and doing most of the benchmarks which are still being referenced in them. He has done a brilliant job!
This page will continue to keep the tests strictly to GPU performance. CPU performance can be viewed here.
(like Arkymedes) I will take in consideration the clock used in each ROM and try to use the maximum allowed by the kernel using SetCPU. HOWEVER, all rom's will be tested at 691 MHz for consistency and any other frequencies will be detailed.
About JIT, unfortunately, all Arkmedes tests show that it doesn't affect 3D performance YET, since all this apps are not properly optimized and didn't take JIT into account. However, this may change with Froyo builds so keep an eye out.
All the ROM's clocked @ 691MHz "Performance" under SetCPU, unless specified otherwise. All tests are conducted 5 times and an average is taken. The tests are carried out in Aeroplane mode with no widgets running on the desktop. No apps are installed aside from the benchmark apps and Apps2SD is used (if enabled by the ROM). The latest version of the benchmark software is always used (they usually only add support for new phones in updates rather than changing benchmark parameters).
Benchmark apps:
Neocore - Qualcomm's own benchmark tool for 3D performance. Measured in FPS
Benchmark - Softweg's test suite for benchmarking. Only the GPU test done here to account for 2D performance. Measured by an internal score.
An3DBench - Tests based on jPCT, a free 3D engine for Java. 7 tests showing the capabilities of the engine. Measured by an internal score.
Note that all the tests mean: The higher the score, the better.
Anyway, here it goes
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
A little suggestion: you should specify wether whe rom is sense or vanilla, and also the CPU clock used for the tests.
Can't wait!
that's a long couple of hours.......
Are you going to do VillainROM 10.2 with Sense + JIT enabled? If not I can try and do a benchmark.
Thread updated
Please Note:
I believe in the EzHero 2.7 stats, that jit is not enabled, with jit EzHero 2.7 is equal or greater than EzHero 2.0
maybe link each of the roms in the first thread for people to easily find...being quite new here i cant fins the Androbin-cr2-5.0.7...what ever that one is...
Your efforts are highly appreciated, good job.
But there is a problem: you didn't say which ROM is JIT enabled and which is not, because as you see CPU benchmarks have better results on JIT enabled ROMs, even though, as you can see, 3D is not affected.
My bench marks
My benchmarks with EzHero 2.7+ JIT:
Linpack- 4.886
Neocore w/ sound- 30.2FPS
Neocore w/o sound- 33.2FPS
Quadrant Standard- 280
Benchmark Pi- 7222 milliseconds
Very good job on the post, well done keeping us informed!
Hello!
What I'm trying to do here is to benchmark any version that I can find in these forums WITHOUT any further optmization. The benchmarkings are done OUT OF THE BOX
So, if I have to MANUALLY enable JIT or any OC AFTER the flashing, it will NOT show in these graphics!
I didn't do that because it is just impossible for me to keep track of every single optmization that can be done to every single one of this ROM's. I just don't have the time and resources for that.
So again, all this tests are done straight after the flashing of the downloaded ROM (logically, after some reboots and bla bla bla).
I really hope that you guys understand that. It's not a way to show which ROM is better, since there are MANY more factors that dictate that, like BT calls, GPS and so on. It's just a way to measure mostly 3D performance out of the box with the ROM's you provide.
sheridan2000 said:
maybe link each of the roms in the first thread for people to easily find...being quite new here i cant fins the Androbin-cr2-5.0.7...what ever that one is...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's a good idea, but I guess the WIKI sticked in the first page should have done the job. It will be redundant but I can try to keep track of them.
Man sad day, all you have to do in EzHero to enable jit is go to the terminal app and type jit-on.
Still, job well done! Kudos!
xenoside said:
Man sad day, all you have to do in EzHero to enable jit is go to the terminal app and type jit-on.
Still, job well done! Kudos!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I will add EZHero 2.7 with JIT enabled after Italy x Paraguay
Arkymedes said:
I will add EZHero 2.7 with JIT enabled after Italy x Paraguay
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
World Cup always comes first my friend lol
its raining pretty hard in the game...
anyways, so 2.0 is JIT enabled and 2.7 is not in your graph? because huge difference in linpack scores with the older having a better score.
you should also mention Benchmark Pi - lower the score, the better.
-2y2k- said:
its raining pretty hard in the game...
anyways, so 2.0 is JIT enabled and 2.7 is not in your graph? because huge difference in linpack scores with the older having a better score.
you should also mention Benchmark Pi - lower the score, the better.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, 2.0 is jit enabled, but now 2.7 is optional due to complaints and split decisions. I posted the benchmarks with jit on the last post of the front page
im a Sense guy but its been awhile since I tried a non-sense one, your ROM is rrreally tempting right now lol
-2y2k- said:
im a Sense guy but its been awhile since I tried a non-sense one, your ROM is rrreally tempting right now lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well vanilla Eclair and EzHero are both great roms, heck even Androbin is tied with those two.
In the Quadrant Graph, androbin doesn't have his bar.
*SOLVED*
Milestone Overclock - a free download from the marketplace does now support the Defy. Quadrant shows promising figures for sure.
Just wondering whether anyone has gotten the Defy to Overclock?
I've been trying some Droid Overclock apps as well as purchasing Set CPU.
I've successfully rooted my phone which is a requirement for enabling overclocking features. Set CPU won't even start.
None of the apps I've tried have been working properly.
Any tips?
in developement
Look on the milestone overclock googlecode page, its on the todo list
good to know
Yepp, thanx a lot. Since the chipset has clear OC potential this will be very interesting. Especially if the Defy has an omap3630 core, we'll see.
dave79 said:
Yepp, thanx a lot. Since the chipset has clear OC potential this will be very interesting. Especially if the Defy has an omap3630 core, we'll see.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm pretty confident that it does indeed have a 3630: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=9540564&postcount=34
Not only because of the screenshot from windows, but look at how close it is to the Droid X, running a 1ghz 3630.
Wow! and getting that benchmark score while running on 800MHz is quite impressive. I've got good hopes that a ported Milestone Overclock will unleash the raw power the phone truly possess.
And this is not the best defy can do. Actually 1117 has been reported from 2 users (one is me).
Im not sure how this phone is so amazing, and so cheap at the same time
umm yeah anyways, just wanted to say i got quadrant scored of around 1110 to 1118 ish i think- after task killing
Really hoping for some custom 2.2 roms in the near future, like some others said it will make this probably -one of- the best androids out there
xdaid said:
And this is not the best defy can do. Actually 1117 has been reported from 2 users (one is me).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My personal best is 1104
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Whoa, nice one, Higgsy!
Sorensiim said:
Whoa, nice one, Higgsy!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
weeeeell to be fair there was a little cheat there, that was with JIT enabled. But JIT by the standard method wasn't stable, at first it was fine but then after ab out an hour I started to get random force closes, so I reverted. Its a little insight to what can be achieved with JIT. IMO I'll take JIT over a 1GHZ overclock.
Could anyone of you guys share your benchmark results after running Milestone Overclock? I'm now running on 1.2GHz and it's stable
xdaid said:
And this is not the best defy can do. Actually 1117 has been reported from 2 users (one is me).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My first benchmark result was in mid 1000 but after a restart I got that score too.
To use JIT is better wait for froyo because have it in native form. There are a appl called JITTER in the market but I think that isn't reliable. (I don't know about other appl similar than)
Now I use the Milestone Overclock beta4 and configure the oc at 1000/56
Someone have better configuration to use? Can explain why?
Hey guys.. Overclocked my Defy with the Milestone Overclock. 1200/66
Got a 1438 benchmark on Quadrant Standard. Putting the vsel any lower got my Device to reboot.
After trying it out I switched back to 1000/52 because some users said that running on 66vsel could damage the CPU.
Main effect I had: Launcher runs very smooth, My battery life went down to 24 hours (37h before).
With 1000/52 I still get a benchmark around 1247
Works for me because I´m saving battery and still got enough power to have a smooth launcher.
But: Can anyone please tell me what the standard settings are ? *lol* Forgot them 800Mhz an vsel=???
Thx in advance.
Daniel (from germany)
Daniel.Stevens said:
Hey guys.. Overclocked my Defy with the Milestone Overclock. 1200/66
Got a 1438 benchmark on Quadrant Standard. Putting the vsel any lower got my Device to reboot.
After trying it out I switched back to 1000/52 because some users said that running on 66vsel could damage the CPU.
Main effect I had: Launcher runs very smooth, My battery life went down to 24 hours (37h before).
With 1000/52 I still get a benchmark around 1247
Works for me because I´m saving battery and still got enough power to have a smooth launcher.
But: Can anyone please tell me what the standard settings are ? *lol* Forgot them 800Mhz an vsel=???
Thx in advance.
Daniel (from germany)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Someone in the other thread was running 800/38, I haven't tried it because like you 1000/52 gives me better battery life than stock and more power on top.
Higgsy said:
Someone in the other thread was running 800/38, I haven't tried it because like you 1000/52 gives me better battery life than stock and more power on top.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for answering ;0)
I just wanted to know the original settings in case I wanted to restore them someday.
Or do I just have to click on "unload module" for that ?!? (I gues that´s it I was just to blind/dumb to see it *lol*)
Thx ;0)
Daniel.Stevens said:
Thanks for answering ;0)
I just wanted to know the original settings in case I wanted to restore them someday.
Or do I just have to click on "unload module" for that ?!? (I gues that´s it I was just to blind/dumb to see it *lol*)
Thx ;0)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah just unload module and untick apply on boot and your back to stock
Im currently running 1100MHZ with a 58vsel, seems stable so far and got a quadrant benchmark of 1317. But i am wondering if this setting is safe for long term use, I need my phone to last till the end of this conract
I noticed alot of people on the forums posting benchmarks after installing different ROM. I decided to download Quadrant just to see what I was pulling. I scored low in comparison to what I've seen, so I just completely wiped my phone back to stock (data wiped and then ODIN) and tried it, and pulled a 4678. Flashed CleanROM SE 1.2, and it went up to 4706. I've seen some people between 5k and 7k. A few videos I watched, people claiming to be completely stock were getting 5600+. Any clue what's wrong here? Is there anyone else out there that is stock that can benchmark and tell me what they get?
Thanks in Advance,
emoti0n
Read through the benchmark threads and you'll come to understand a few things:
- benchmarks are useless as an ongoing measurement. They merely show capability potential.
- your benchmarks will vary not only based on the rom and kernel, but what other apps you have running as services, what specific device configuration you have set at the time of running.
Does your phone perform amazingly doing what you want it to do? That's the only relevant and important measurement.
-----
I would love to help you, but help yourself first: ask a better question
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
spycedtx said:
Read through the benchmark threads and you'll come to understand a few things:
- benchmarks are useless as an ongoing measurement. They merely show capability potential.
- your benchmarks will vary not only based on the rom and kernel, but what other apps you have running as services, what specific device configuration you have set at the time of running.
Does your phone perform amazingly doing what you want it to do? That's the only relevant and important measurement.
-----
I would love to help you, but help yourself first: ask a better question
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right. I understand what you're saying and that software environment can change the results, but two out-of-box state phones should score somewhat close to each other, yes or no? In comparison to what I've seen, my CPU is where I'm lacking. I also understand that I can OC and hit higher scores, but just comparing it to other phones that claim to out-of-box / stock - I'm scoring low in comparison.
Spy is probably right. But benchmarks should be somewhat similar
This is running DAGr8's AOKP Bullet build.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my GT-N7105 using Tapatalk 2
emoti0n said:
I noticed alot of people on the forums posting benchmarks after installing different ROM. I decided to download Quadrant just to see what I was pulling. I scored low in comparison to what I've seen, so I just completely wiped my phone back to stock (data wiped and then ODIN) and tried it, and pulled a 4678. Flashed CleanROM SE 1.2, and it went up to 4706. I've seen some people between 5k and 7k. A few videos I watched, people claiming to be completely stock were getting 5600+. Any clue what's wrong here? Is there anyone else out there that is stock that can benchmark and tell me what they get?
Thanks in Advance,
emoti0n
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've been following the saber kernal for a while and seen that some guys are running the saber kernel on clean rom OC'd. Not sure if that what your looking for but that would put you right up there along the 7k mark.
I don't try to squeeze out numbers on the quadrant thing but I have ran a few times just to see. I score right about 6900. Note 2, CleanRom 4.0.5 with the kernal from that rom and no other tweaks that I know of that would increase the score. I am not over clocked or anything. Seems fine to me
Sorry to bother you guys with that silly question. Total user error. I had power-saving mode on, and it didn't even occur to me. I pretty much turn it on first thing anytime I reset my phone, and do it without thinking anymore. However, after resetting back to pure stock one more time, without power-saving mode, I actually hit 7168. Basically, I was trying to see the difference myself of stock performance verses a different ROM / kernel. I would also like to see the battery life difference for myself.
Anyhow, thanks to everyone for their responses.
I recently purchased z2 and ran geekbench, single core score was around 1700 but multicore didn't even crossed 3000, I have used stock and now I am using aokp ROM both have same result.
Could you please recommend a good stable ROM, with good camera and slow motion recording and stable and smooth usage, thanks.
@monkpsych
don't have the phone already -> didn't test any, but as i have read Jaguar should be the best to go. ;D
Thanks, currently using RR later will try jaguar, but none of the ROMs support slow recording I guess.
RR is a good rom. I'm using the latest version and it's very fast. Try a clean flash and make sure Battery Mode is set to Balanced. Check out my scores with [email protected]
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Which version of RR are you using, and with what setting, custom kernel and does it support volte.
monkpsych said:
Which version of RR are you using, and with what setting, custom kernel and does it support volte.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This one https://sourceforge.net/projects/resurrectionremix/files/zuk_z2/
Using the kernel that comes with the ROM. Don't know about volte u have to test it.
I installed the ROM but I cannot oc to 2.3ghz there is option kernel auditor but it switch back to 2150 when I manually set it to 2.3 , any suggestion?
monkpsych said:
I installed the ROM but I cannot oc to 2.3ghz there is option kernel auditor but it switch back to 2150 when I manually set it to 2.3 , any suggestion?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Check out this thread.
https://forum.xda-developers.com/zuk-z2-pro/help/2-3ghz-overclock-zui-2-5-t3556324
Thanks bro, it worked now I can finally get good benchmark scores. Thanks
monkpsych said:
Thanks bro, it worked now I can finally get good benchmark scores. Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No problem mate
maxallepi said:
RR is a good rom. I'm using the latest version and it's very fast. Try a clean flash and make sure Battery Mode is set to Balanced. Check out my scores with [email protected]
View attachment 4146990
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
how is Antutu on that RR? On Fedor's RR 5.8.3 I was getting 130-135k
ar_15 said:
how is Antutu on that RR? On Fedor's RR 5.8.3 I was getting 130-135k
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Without OC 130-135k. With OC 152-154k
Could you try on rr official ROM
maxallepi said:
Without OC 130-135k. With OC 152-154k
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hello! What is your ambient temperature?
Because I have clean flashed RR and get 124k in Antutu, and 124k as well after OC, however the ambient temperature here at home is a bit high. Could that be the reason of my low scores?
I did get around 146k once with Jaguar, but with overclock and performance governor (and cooler ambient temperature I guess), but the thing with Jaguar was that from time to time I got high battery drain with the phone sleeping.
Do you guys use Interactive governor? Do you tweak anything else after flashing?
Thanks!
Avan7 said:
Hello! What is your ambient temperature?
Because I have clean flashed RR and get 124k in Antutu, and 124k as well after OC, however the ambient temperature here at home is a bit high. Could that be the reason of my low scores?
I did get around 146k once with Jaguar, but with overclock and performance governor (and cooler ambient temperature I guess), but the thing with Jaguar was that from time to time I got high battery drain with the phone sleeping.
Do you guys use Interactive governor? Do you tweak anything else after flashing?
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ambient was probably around 20c. 124k for stock clocks looks ok but for OC it's low. Double check your OC. Don't think it's the ambient temps unless they are above 25-30c.
For my benchmark I was using interactive w/o tweaks and with balance mode.
What result were you getting on stock rom?
maxallepi said:
Ambient was probably around 20c. 124k for stock clocks looks ok but for OC it's low. Double check your OC. Don't think it's the ambient temps unless they are above 25-30c.
For my benchmark I was using interactive w/o tweaks and with balance mode.
What result were you getting on stock rom?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I see, yeah ambient here these days has been kind of high
I'm benching again with the two files from the thread you mentioned (to apply the OC). Have you tried Jaguar ROM? Apparently it is one of the fastest performers.
EDIT: With stock rom i was getting around 134k , however lately temperature has been high in the city I live, so figures that the phone would reach higher temperatures quicker, though i wonder at what temp it lowers its frequencies.
EDIT.EDIT: I got 149930 (haha needed just 70 for 150k) using both files from OC thread, init.qcom.post_boot.sh and thermal-engine.conf. I wonder how safe it is to use the thermal-engine.conf file, do you guys use it as well?
Avan7 said:
I see, yeah ambient here these days have been kind of high
I'm benching again with the two files from the thread you mentioned (to apply the OC). Have you tried Jaguar ROM? Apparently it is one of the fastest performers.
EDIT: With stock rom i was getting around 134k , however lately temperature has been high in the city I live, so figures that the phone would reach higher temperatures quicker, though i wonder at what temp it lowers its frequencies.
EDIT.EDIT: I got 149930 (haha needed just 70 for 150k) using both files from OC thread, init.qcom.post_boot.sh and thermal-engine.conf. I wonder how safe it is to use the thermal-engine.conf file, do you guys use it as well?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awesome score!! With Jaguar ROM? Haven't tried it yet. Yeah I used the thermal file as well. Max I've seen the CPU was mid 60s.
maxallepi said:
Awesome score!! With Jaguar ROM? Haven't tried it yet. Yeah I used the thermal file as well. Max I've seen the CPU was mid 60s.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
With RR. Well, just flashed Dirty Unicorns. I'll bench it tomorrow, so far so good :victory:
How to solve heating issue
kashyapp said:
How to solve heating issue
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How hot does it get? Does it get hot when idle or gaming?