What features would people like to see in a Pixel C 2? - Pixel C Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting

I'm looking to get a tablet, and so far the Pixel C is definitely at the top of my list. As eager as I am to order one, I think I'm going to hold off since Google I/O is just around the corner. The rumors I've seen regarding tablets at I/O have all been centered around a new Nexus 7, but I'm waiting to see if there is an update to the Pixel C, or introduction of a new larger Nexus tablet. Along those lines, what hardware updates or changes would people like to see in a Pixel C 2? Personally, I'd like to see an active stylus, and the addition of an SD card slot.

I'd rather they just fix the build/quality control issues with current the Pixel C so it's worth the high price tag. That combined with Android N and I'd be happy. Maybe a folio without a keyboard? Not much really.

1 - Front facing speakers. The speaker placement on the Pixel C sucks and it is hard for me to not cover the speakers with my hands when watching content in landscape orientation.
2 - Fingerprint reader. I don't use encryption or a pattern lock on my tablet because I find anything more than a fingerprint reader to be an annoyance.
3 - No magnets. The keyboard is cool, but I would rather have had a Pixel C without the heavy magnets inside. I understand that it would not be economical to offer it both ways, but I have no interest at all in a keyboard, so it's just an annoyance for me.
4 - OLED display. The display on the Pixel C is pretty much flawless and among the best IPS displays I have ever seen. It is definitely on par with the QHD+ Sharp IGZO display on my XPS 13 9350 and the LG panel in my Dell Ultrasharp U3014 monitor. That being said, I still think OLED looks better. The way vibrant colors pop and the contrast ratio makes me not want anything else, save for something like a quantum dot display.
5 - Anti Reflective Coating. This one is a no brainer and there is no excuse for not having one at this point. Apple does it and it makes a significant difference when using a tablet in a bright environment.
6 - 4:3 Aspect Ratio. Using 1:√1 for the display was innovative and it makes sense in some scenarios, but nobody else is using it and it's just going to be something that people are not going to design apps for. I would much prefer a 4:3 aspect ratio display, which I personally think is perfect for tablets.
7 - Android Bootloader. If they are going to continue to use Android in the Pixel line, rather than ChromeOS, use an Android bootloader. Also, quit punishing me with a 30 second wait every time I boot up with an unlocked bootloader. I feel like the lack of ROMs for the Pixel C is mostly due to this ridiculous ChromeOS bootloader making everything exceptionally difficult.
8 - Faster Storage. Google has historically had abysmally slow storage on Nexus devices and the Pixel C is no exception. Utilizing a faster interface like UFS 2.0, or better yet, PCIe NVME like Apple would make the device feel a lot quicker. It has been shown on devices like the Galaxy S7 and any recent Apple tablet/phone that having fast storage makes programs load faster, install faster, and boot faster. There's no excuse for Google using EMMC 5.0 in a flagship, top shelf product like the Pixel C.
9 - OpenGL 4.5 Support. I have no idea why Google does not enable support for OpenGL 4.5, seeing as how the Tegra X1 and even the Tegra K1 support it. Unless they have a damn good reason not to, they need to turn this on.

Couldn't agree more, but just want to add a number 10. A USB-C CABLE !!! One not connected to a charger please...

oRAirwolf said:
1 - Front facing speakers. The speaker placement on the Pixel C sucks and it is hard for me to not cover the speakers with my hands when watching content in landscape orientation.
2 - Fingerprint reader. I don't use encryption or a pattern lock on my tablet because I find anything more than a fingerprint reader to be an annoyance.
3 - No magnets. The keyboard is cool, but I would rather have had a Pixel C without the heavy magnets inside. I understand that it would not be economical to offer it both ways, but I have no interest at all in a keyboard, so it's just an annoyance for me.
4 - OLED display. The display on the Pixel C is pretty much flawless and among the best IPS displays I have ever seen. It is definitely on par with the QHD+ Sharp IGZO display on my XPS 13 9350 and the LG panel in my Dell Ultrasharp U3014 monitor. That being said, I still think OLED looks better. The way vibrant colors pop and the contrast ratio makes me not want anything else, save for something like a quantum dot display.
5 - Anti Reflective Coating. This one is a no brainer and there is no excuse for not having one at this point. Apple does it and it makes a significant difference when using a tablet in a bright environment.
6 - 4:3 Aspect Ratio. Using 1:√1 for the display was innovative and it makes sense in some scenarios, but nobody else is using it and it's just going to be something that people are not going to design apps for. I would much prefer a 4:3 aspect ratio display, which I personally think is perfect for tablets.
7 - Android Bootloader. If they are going to continue to use Android in the Pixel line, rather than ChromeOS, use an Android bootloader. Also, quit punishing me with a 30 second wait every time I boot up with an unlocked bootloader. I feel like the lack of ROMs for the Pixel C is mostly due to this ridiculous ChromeOS bootloader making everything exceptionally difficult.
8 - Faster Storage. Google has historically had abysmally slow storage on Nexus devices and the Pixel C is no exception. Utilizing a faster interface like UFS 2.0, or better yet, PCIe NVME like Apple would make the device feel a lot quicker. It has been shown on devices like the Galaxy S7 and any recent Apple tablet/phone that having fast storage makes programs load faster, install faster, and boot faster. There's no excuse for Google using EMMC 5.0 in a flagship, top shelf product like the Pixel C.
9 - OpenGL 4.5 Support. I have no idea why Google does not enable support for OpenGL 4.5, seeing as how the Tegra X1 and even the Tegra K1 support it. Unless they have a damn good reason not to, they need to turn this on.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Front facing speakers would be nice. ABSOLUTELY agree on the android bootloader, but with this being a "Pixel" device, I don't know that it'll happen. Is there a reason for the 30 second delay with the unlocked bootloader, or is it really just to deter people from doing it? As far as the screen goes, I though IPS generally had better color reproduction than oled, with the advantage to oled being power consumption. I'm with you on faster storage too. I've never understood why a manufacturer would cut corners like this on such a premium device.

thesomnambulist said:
Front facing speakers would be nice. ABSOLUTELY agree on the android bootloader, but with this being a "Pixel" device, I don't know that it'll happen. Is there a reason for the 30 second delay with the unlocked bootloader, or is it really just to deter people from doing it? As far as the screen goes, I though IPS generally had better color reproduction than oled, with the advantage to oled being power consumption. I'm with you on faster storage too. I've never understood why a manufacturer would cut corners like this on such a premium device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
According to Anandtech (who actually use display testing equipment to measure contrast, grayscale accuracy, color accuracy, etc,), AMOLED's are as good as IPS at this point. Here is a quote from their Galaxy Note 5 / Galaxy S6 Edge+ review:
With this generation of AMOLED, Samsung has definitely equaled the best LCDs on the market. I suspect within the next year or two it will be inevitable that Samsung AMOLED will be clearly superior to even the best LCDs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And from the Galaxy S6 / S6 Edge review:
With this generation I suspect Samsung is either meeting or exceeding the best LCDs in quality, and with the next generation of AMOLED it’s likely that high end smartphones will have to migrate to AMOLED to remain competitive.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

oRAirwolf said:
1 - Front facing speakers. The speaker placement on the Pixel C sucks and it is hard for me to not cover the speakers with my hands when watching content in landscape orientation.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed.
2 - Fingerprint reader. I don't use encryption or a pattern lock on my tablet because I find anything more than a fingerprint reader to be an annoyance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Gimmick
3 - No magnets. The keyboard is cool, but I would rather have had a Pixel C without the heavy magnets inside. I understand that it would not be economical to offer it both ways, but I have no interest at all in a keyboard, so it's just an annoyance for me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dont agree, its useful to have keyboard, it is one of thr reasons I bought the Pixel C. Makes a smaller laptop, complentary smaller than a Chromebook.
4 - OLED display. The display on the Pixel C is pretty much flawless and among the best IPS displays I have ever seen. It is definitely on par with the QHD+ Sharp IGZO display on my XPS 13 9350 and the LG panel in my Dell Ultrasharp U3014 monitor. That being said, I still think OLED looks better. The way vibrant colors pop and the contrast ratio makes me not want anything else, save for something like a quantum dot display.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Neutral, screen looks fine to me.
5 - Anti Reflective Coating. This one is a no brainer and there is no excuse for not having one at this point. Apple does it and it makes a significant difference when using a tablet in a bright environment.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed.
6 - 4:3 Aspect Ratio. Using 1:√1 for the display was innovative and it makes sense in some scenarios, but nobody else is using it and it's just going to be something that people are not going to design apps for. I would much prefer a 4:3 aspect ratio display, which I personally think is perfect for tablets.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dont agree, the nearer to 16:9 the better. 4:3 just wastes more screen.
7 - Android Bootloader. If they are going to continue to use Android in the Pixel line, rather than ChromeOS, use an Android bootloader. Also, quit punishing me with a 30 second wait every time I boot up with an unlocked bootloader. I feel like the lack of ROMs for the Pixel C is mostly due to this ridiculous ChromeOS bootloader making everything exceptionally difficult.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Strongly agree. It is a frankenstein creation as is, halfway between Chromebook and Nexus.
8 - Faster Storage. Google has historically had abysmally slow storage on Nexus devices and the Pixel C is no exception. Utilizing a faster interface like UFS 2.0, or better yet, PCIe NVME like Apple would make the device feel a lot quicker. It has been shown on devices like the Galaxy S7 and any recent Apple tablet/phone that having fast storage makes programs load faster, install faster, and boot faster. There's no excuse for Google using EMMC 5.0 in a flagship, top shelf product like the Pixel C.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I find it fast enough?
9 - OpenGL 4.5 Support. I have no idea why Google does not enable support for OpenGL 4.5, seeing as how the Tegra X1 and even the Tegra K1 support it. Unless they have a damn good reason not to, they need to turn this on.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I dont know what that is, but all my apps work and perform well.

oRAirwolf said:
1 - Front facing speakers. The speaker placement on the Pixel C sucks and it is hard for me to not cover the speakers with my hands when watching content in landscape orientation.
2 - Fingerprint reader. I don't use encryption or a pattern lock on my tablet because I find anything more than a fingerprint reader to be an annoyance.
3 - No magnets. The keyboard is cool, but I would rather have had a Pixel C without the heavy magnets inside. I understand that it would not be economical to offer it both ways, but I have no interest at all in a keyboard, so it's just an annoyance for me.
4 - OLED display. The display on the Pixel C is pretty much flawless and among the best IPS displays I have ever seen. It is definitely on par with the QHD+ Sharp IGZO display on my XPS 13 9350 and the LG panel in my Dell Ultrasharp U3014 monitor. That being said, I still think OLED looks better. The way vibrant colors pop and the contrast ratio makes me not want anything else, save for something like a quantum dot display.
5 - Anti Reflective Coating. This one is a no brainer and there is no excuse for not having one at this point. Apple does it and it makes a significant difference when using a tablet in a bright environment.
6 - 4:3 Aspect Ratio. Using 1:√1 for the display was innovative and it makes sense in some scenarios, but nobody else is using it and it's just going to be something that people are not going to design apps for. I would much prefer a 4:3 aspect ratio display, which I personally think is perfect for tablets.
7 - Android Bootloader. If they are going to continue to use Android in the Pixel line, rather than ChromeOS, use an Android bootloader. Also, quit punishing me with a 30 second wait every time I boot up with an unlocked bootloader. I feel like the lack of ROMs for the Pixel C is mostly due to this ridiculous ChromeOS bootloader making everything exceptionally difficult.
8 - Faster Storage. Google has historically had abysmally slow storage on Nexus devices and the Pixel C is no exception. Utilizing a faster interface like UFS 2.0, or better yet, PCIe NVME like Apple would make the device feel a lot quicker. It has been shown on devices like the Galaxy S7 and any recent Apple tablet/phone that having fast storage makes programs load faster, install faster, and boot faster. There's no excuse for Google using EMMC 5.0 in a flagship, top shelf product like the Pixel C.
9 - OpenGL 4.5 Support. I have no idea why Google does not enable support for OpenGL 4.5, seeing as how the Tegra X1 and even the Tegra K1 support it. Unless they have a damn good reason not to, they need to turn this on.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1. Neutral, I don't really use speakers at all on my pixel
2. Neutral, on phone, yes it is important on tablets? In just matter of convenience.
3. No magnets are good, keyboard are nice, I don't have to Coupe with shifty 3.rd party keyboards
4. No OLED are really shifty with burn ins. I'm happy with the screen.
5 agreed
6. Absolutely not, just buy ipad if you want 4:3 or nexus 9. The ratio is really good less water space while watching films but nice to use in portrait orientation. The screen ratio is the reason I bought the damn thing. As for 16:9,it is the reason im not buying Z4 tablet being the Sony fan I am.
7.agreed
8.would be nice, but the one we are having is fine really.
9. Waiting for vulkan

My only desire is for Google to make up their mind about the kind of device they want to release. Make a decision and stick to it. This hybrid nonsense is going to be the death of this device due to the ChromeOS bootloader.

NYCHitman1 said:
My only desire is for Google to make up their mind about the kind of device they want to release. Make a decision and stick to it. This hybrid nonsense is going to be the death of this device due to the ChromeOS bootloader.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So then you'd have preferred the Pixel C delayed? You can always not buy it and wait for what meets your goal?
I agree, its not one thing or another, and is basically a well spec'd high cost Android tablet neither Chromebook or Nexus.

nigelhealy said:
So then you'd have preferred the Pixel C delayed? You can always not buy it and wait for what meets your goal?
I agree, its not one thing or another, and is basically a well spec'd high cost Android tablet neither Chromebook or Nexus.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I already own one. I love the design and the hardware. What I'm not fond of is the ridiculous ChromeOS bootloader and kernel requiring a signed boot.img via verity and vboot in order to post boot into system.

NYCHitman1 said:
I already own one. I love the design and the hardware. What I'm not fond of is the ridiculous ChromeOS bootloader and kernel requiring a signed boot.img via verity and vboot in order to post boot into system.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I feel exactly the same. At least you have the experience and knowledge to be able to repack the modified boot.img properly. I've been modding kernels using Android Kitchen on my Nexus 6 & 6P for two years now to remove forced encryption. It's ridiculously simple. But for this device, I definitely do not possess the knowledge to repack an image with vboot (although I have been successful in unpacking it thanks to @cheep5k8). I just wish somebody could write up a tutorial or something in order to modify the stock boot image on this device to make it rootable. That way, I wouldn't have to wait or bug any devs when a new factory image comes out, as I'd be able to do it myself.

charesa39 said:
I feel exactly the same. At least you have the experience and knowledge to be able to repack the modified boot.img properly. I've been modding kernels using Android Kitchen on my Nexus 6 & 6P for two years now to remove forced encryption. It's ridiculously simple. But for this device, I definitely do not possess the knowledge to repack an image with vboot (although I have been successful in unpacking it thanks to @cheep5k8). I just wish somebody could write up a tutorial or something in order to modify the stock boot image on this device to make it rootable. That way, I wouldn't have to wait or bug any devs when a new factory image comes out, as I'd be able to do it myself.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, unpacking is an option, but it isn't ideal. Especially when I have to consider the fact that our Jenkins server isn't going to do any of this. Our official builds all get pumped out via this server together. Plus, we flash SU inline in our script. It's just incredibly inconvenient.

1. AMOLED display, because of the contrast, black level and angles of view,
2. Much better keyboard (something like LG K380 would be perfect, it's the only mobile keyboard that I can write as fast as on normal keyboard - I currently use it with Pixel C because I could really write fast on the dock keyboard),
3. Ability to dock in portrait (important for writing).
I actually quite like the aspect ratio. I would buy it if it was 4:3.

NYCHitman1 said:
My only desire is for Google to make up their mind about the kind of device they want to release. Make a decision and stick to it. This hybrid nonsense is going to be the death of this device due to the ChromeOS bootloader.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I kinda agree. I am not sure that the confusion is helpful for anyone.
However, I'd rather this was dual boot from the start instead of a one/other binary. I accept that ChromeOS isn't exactly suited to touch input (although the Chromebook Pixel(s) made a more convincing case than one would expect, as has the well regarded and remarkably long lasting C720P), and I get that Android isn't overly comfortable with mouse/trackpad/physical keyboard interventions (although, the Pixel C is making that case). What I find interesting is that the Pixel C kb that this is typed on is remarkably close to the Chromebook/box kb (I have both/all three).
Out of all this, I want a properly dual boot device. One that has the option without any dismantling. ChromeOS devices have the ability to dual boot, as do Nexus and/or any Android device that's bootloader unlocked. There's no reason that the 'Frankenboard' Pixel C should be different, particularly as it is a reference/developer/niche device (in the sense that it's not promoted beyond the very interested--ie like most Nexus devices before, say, the N7 or N5).
Sent from my Pixel C using XDA-Developers mobile app

Related

The Best WP7 Phone Possible (2nd edition)

So I've done some basic research on phone components out there that could truly create an AMAZING WP7 phone, while still staying within realistic terms, and here's what I've come up with (I'm giving explanations for each aspect in parentheses):
The ultimate WP7 would be a 4.7in (Can still fit in your pocket comfortably, while giving you a perfect view of the 1080P definition of your screen) HTC Touch Pro 3 (because its predecessor truly is the best combination of practicality and entertainment) with a dual-core 1.5ghz snapdragon processor (It has a release date set for Q4 2010, but will probably be moved to Q1 2011), 1024mb RAM (It's very rare to find a phone with this spec, but it is by no means unrealistic), a fourth chassis spec for a physical gamepad along with the physical keyboard with tilt (the actual keyboard would slide down, and the game pad would appear on the left and right of the screen by separation of the landscape physical keyboard while it's not in a slide down position, with an analog stick on the left, and four action keys on the right (Definitely the most unrealistic part of this phone description )), a 12 megapixel camera (nothing new in a phone) with HD video, 64 GB of Micro SD enabled (...), and at least 6 hours of talk time along with 48 hours standby (with the dual-core of the snapdragon processor users can expect a significant reduction in battery consumption since the cores are independent of each other) all on the Windows Phone 7 UI.
It’s a mouthful, but it’s almost enough to bring tears to my eyes… lol not really, but just make the phone HTC, and significantly loosen your hardware requirements Microsoft
Do you guys have a different definition of what makes the ultimate WP7 phone?
4.7in!
Thats insain, the HD2 is considered large enough (if not slight too big) 4 would surfice
dual 1.5Ghz snap dragon? really, since smartphones are working away from multitasking due to instability issues its unlikely to make much of a difference, but will happily take the core reduction and lower power consumption! 1080p is an insainly high res as well, im sure it will look good as an advertising milestone but with such high DPI i think you'll find it hard to tell the difference between 720p and 1080p infact i believe you would need to have your device 6inchs from your eyes to see 1080p at standard DPI, to detect the differences when you take in to account the significantly higher DPI you would need to have the phone on the end of your nose, viewing angles would require the device to be nearer 10inchs. not that id turn it down but its not a big deal
what i want is a 45nm 1.5ghz snapdragon, ~4in display using 65k or 16m bit depth, no more than 8mp camera, (12 on such as small lens would be **** or at best no improvment) a propper graphics core with its drivers!
Ill stick with the gig of RAM but suggest an internal 64GB storage and a SD expansion, multiband support so i can make it work everywhere! 4G would be handy if networks ever upgrade, everything else can be the same as the HD2 because that is the king just now! oh, you can keep your keyboard but what would be cool is a docking station that projects a keyboard on to a table
as for the OS, well to be honest unless the Gods on here unlock WP7 ill keep my 6.5.5
blaiz123 said:
The ultimate WP7 would be a 4.7in (Can still fit in your pocket comfortably, while giving you a perfect view of the 1080P definition of your screen)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've held the Droid X in my hand and the biggest downside to that phone, I see, is the size. Its huge!
Also, 4.7 inches just to view 1080p? With many 32" TVs out there you can't tell the difference between 1080p and 720p. With that in mind, 720p HD resolution won't make more difference than an SD video so you can be sure that 1080p won't be anything more than a selling point.
theomni said:
I've held the Droid X in my hand and the biggest downside to that phone, I see, is the size. Its huge!
Also, 4.7 inches just to view 1080p? With many 32" TVs out there you can't tell the difference between 1080p and 720p. With that in mind, 720p HD resolution won't make more difference than an SD video so you can be sure that 1080p won't be anything more than a selling point.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think the important part would be how well it records... Also, if I don't have to do any converting so it plays on a given device then all the better - even if it's not really usable on the phone. I may hook the phone up to a friends TV while visiting. So, there is potential for use, even beyond a selling point.
dazza9075 said:
4.7in!
Thats insain, the HD2 is considered large enough (if not slight too big) 4 would surfice
dual 1.5Ghz snap dragon? really, since smartphones are working away from multitasking due to instability issues its unlikely to make much of a difference, but will happily take the core reduction and lower power consumption! 1080p is an insainly high res as well, im sure it will look good as an advertising milestone but with such high DPI i think you'll find it hard to tell the difference between 720p and 1080p infact i believe you would need to have your device 6inchs from your eyes to see 1080p at standard DPI, to detect the differences when you take in to account the significantly higher DPI you would need to have the phone on the end of your nose, viewing angles would require the device to be nearer 10inchs. not that id turn it down but its not a big deal
what i want is a 45nm 1.5ghz snapdragon, ~4in display using 65k or 16m bit depth, no more than 8mp camera, (12 on such as small lens would be **** or at best no improvment) a propper graphics core with its drivers!
Ill stick with the gig of RAM but suggest an internal 64GB storage and a SD expansion, multiband support so i can make it work everywhere! 4G would be handy if networks ever upgrade, everything else can be the same as the HD2 because that is the king just now! oh, you can keep your keyboard but what would be cool is a docking station that projects a keyboard on to a table
as for the OS, well to be honest unless the Gods on here unlock WP7 ill keep my 6.5.5
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
MS isn't allowing 3rd-party multi-tasking at this time, but will do it with stock parts of the OS - so even if there isn't support for other programs you'll still use it (but I'm willing to bet that there will be support at some time).
The ARM spec that the chip is based on includes the 4G component. You'll probably need a provider patch / software update, but it's in the 1.5 GHz dual core snapdragon.
The GPU is also in there, and although not as good as others I've read about, still is nothing to scoff at
For me though, the bigger the better when it comes to the screen. I'm looking for an all-in-one device that goes everywhere. If I need a better camera, I'll grab mine. A better video camera, I'll grab mine. A better portable computer, I'll grab mine. But my next phone will certainly be my GPS, Music Player, and of course, phone.
I also like the slide out keyboard, if for no other reason than no wasted screen real estate.
dazza9075 said:
what would be cool is a docking station that projects a keyboard on to a table
)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That would be a pretty sweet deal, but I think we're looking at at least 2020 for projection keyboards
blaiz123 said:
That would be a pretty sweet deal, but I think we're looking at at least 2020 for projection keyboards
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually, there are projection keyboards out now and they've been around since the beginning of this decade. All though I'm not sure how good this technology is now.
theomni said:
Actually, there are projection keyboards out now and they've been around since the beginning of this decade. All though I'm not sure how good this technology is now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you serious? So you mean I can actually sit down with my computer and if I have the proper platform I could type on a projected keyboard that would disappear when I turned off the platform? Because that would be pretty amazing.
Yep, the keyboards that are outthere emit a light onto the surface and via infrared, "feels" your touch of the projected key just llike hitting an actual keyboard. Find online...
I'd like to have a 4" device with a landscape 5 row querty keyboard, a touch pro 3 but bigger then the current touch pro2 and thinner. As far as the internal go, I'd love to have high end but I'll settle with the base seeing how everythings going to be performanced based on that.
mapaz04 said:
Yep, the keyboards that are outthere emit a light onto the surface and via infrared, "feels" your touch of the projected key just llike hitting an actual keyboard. Find online...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Now that is very intresting...hmm i wonder how it feels not to have any key feedback, need to look in to that, i can see a bluetooth projector for computers and PDAs being hugely useful...asuming it works that is!
mapaz04 said:
Yep, the keyboards that are outthere emit a light onto the surface and via infrared, "feels" your touch of the projected key just llike hitting an actual keyboard. Find online...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, but I wouldn't want to buy into this technology until it evolves so that the user can also feel the touch of the keys of the projected keyboard. And I'm not talking about a simple vibration, I would actually want to feel as if I'm typing on a real keyboard. That type of technology will definitely not be available until at least 2018
Check out
the specs for the new HTC HD3, sounds perfect to me! Can't wait to get my hands on one...
registeredxdadevi said:
the specs for the new HTC HD3, sounds perfect to me! Can't wait to get my hands on one...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
anyone wanna pop the bubble?
Here
is the link
http://www.pcworld.idg.com.au/article/351797/leaked_htc_hd3_smartphone_revealed/
Not sure how true it is, but sounds good to me...
registeredxdadevi said:
is the link
http://www.pcworld.idg.com.au/article/351797/leaked_htc_hd3_smartphone_revealed/
Not sure how true it is, but sounds good to me...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awwwwhhh, I thought it said DUAL-CORE 1.5 ghz processor, that almost made me want to buy the phone, even though it lacks a physical keyboard with tilt (Which is a MAJOR dealbreaker for me)
Besides what is up with all of these HTC HD promotions, how come there are no Touch Pro 3 announcements. HTC is being very narrowminded not promoting a phone that could actually distinguish itself from the iphone in terms of hardware (and I'm talking about more than just a bigger screen...)
I just
love the big screen, with the screen even bigger it's got my wallet! Just not sure about this new windows 7...hopefully we get to test it somehow before purchasing.
Kloc said:
I'd like to have a 4" device with a landscape 5 row querty keyboard, a touch pro 3 but bigger then the current touch pro2 and thinner. As far as the internal go, I'd love to have high end but I'll settle with the base seeing how everythings going to be performanced based on that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
2nd that
specs etc...don't care...wp7 should run smoothly on any device running wp7...
i'm being cpt. obvious
I'm a writer. I write about cell phones. I've used all of the WP7 phones. The best one is the Samsung Focus. That's my opinion. It has by far the best display. the right size screen and the best form factor. It's well made despite the rap that it's plastic. The plastic on this phone and the build quality are excellent. The HD7 is heavy. The start button is awkward and the display is pitiful. The HTC Surround is bulky, housing a speaker that virtually nobody uses. The LG Optimus is a nice phone, but it's heavy and small. The screen is narrow. The HTC Mozart is very nice. It's smaller and the display is nowhere near the Focus. It has a better camera than the others. This is my take. I've had several takes on all of them. The Focus wins.
ennx said:
I'm a writer. I write about cell phones. I've used all of the WP7 phones. The best one is the Samsung Focus. That's my opinion. It has by far the best display. the right size screen and the best form factor. It's well made despite the rap that it's plastic. The plastic on this phone and the build quality are excellent. The HD7 is heavy. The start button is awkward and the display is pitiful. The HTC Surround is bulky, housing a speaker that virtually nobody uses. The LG Optimus is a nice phone, but it's heavy and small. The screen is narrow. The HTC Mozart is very nice. It's smaller and the display is nowhere near the Focus. It has a better camera than the others. This is my take. I've had several takes on all of them. The Focus wins.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really, I don't find the HD7 heavy at all. Matter of fact, I would say a couple of inches more than the HD7 would make the perfect phone!
makoute said:
Really, I don't find the HD7 heavy at all. Matter of fact, I would say a couple of inches more than the HD7 would make the perfect phone!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree, I find the heft to be reassuring, not overly heavy. But I've also had the tp2 and hd2.

Would you consider 5x an upgrade from a Galaxy S4?

Has anyone who has jumped from a Galaxy S4 to a Nexus 5X consider the switch an upgrade?
I am considering getting a midrange phone to last me 8 months until my next subsidized Verizon upgrade, I would insist on a replaceable battery for a phone being used for over a year and/or costing over ~$400, but the 5X looks usable at $329.
The specs look similar, and the 5X display is perhaps a downgrade, but I am sick of laggy S4 touchwiz, and it looks like installing CM on my baseband S4 will brick the phone.
I guess other options are the Moto X Pure or Nexus 6P but I have trouble reconciling spending even that much for a phone programmed to die by way of non-replaceable burnt out battery.
i switched from a 16GB S4 + 16GB SDcard to the 32GB 5X.
do i consider it an upgrade? yes, definitely. will i miss the SD-slot? maybe eventually. will i miss the removable battery? not if the battery does its job at least as good as the one in my S4, which still is almost as good as new (back in my S1 times i had to switch between 3 batteries).
as you already said, touchwiz just sucks and (imo) is ugly as hell. the nexus just runs so much smoother and doesn't come with all the bloat. the fingerprint sensor works perfectly and makes picking up the phone and actually using it quite a bit faster. rooting is easy, updates come quick, and i have a guarantee that i get those updates as soon as possible.
the camera is just amazing in comparison. the screen, while not being an amoled display does a great job and of course doesn't suffer from the movement shadows i had to deal with on the S4.
considering CM on the S4: well im one of the lucky ones who got his antenna fried, a bug that to my knowledge never got completely fixed or even fully acknowledged. the consequences being that cell reception was only ever acceptable on that one build.
i hope this helps. if it's worth to spend $329 on it for only eight months is entirely up to you.
The display is most certainly not a downgrade. OLED has come a long way in the last few years but the S4 generation OLED had subpar colour accuracy and brightness even for its day.
On the other hand the 5x IPS panel took the top mobile IPS panel spot away from the iPhone 6s which costs twice as much.
http://anandtech.com/show/9742/the-google-nexus-5x-review/2
I really don't know what else to say about the Nexus 5X's display, because there's really nothing that can be criticized. I would certainly like if the brightness went up to 600 nits, but I would also prefer that it went to 6000 nits, and obviously that's asking a bit much. As far as LCDs go, the Nexus 5X has one of the best, if not the best that I've seen to date. At this point Google and their OEM partners are going to have to look to gamut as a vector of improvement, but only after proper color management is available at the OS level in order to avoid the problems that have plagued wider gamut displays, which have lacked suitable color management to properly map sRGB content into the wider color space.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks. Yeah upon more research it looks like the 5x is definitely an upgrade from S4, I thought I had seen some benchmarks somewhere that showed them to be similar, must have been the geekbench site, but phonearena's benchmarks show the 5x to be far superior to the S4 in both performance and display, and not far behind the 6P. I should have pulled the trigger at $80 off in November, guess I will have to settle for $50 off.
Only reservation now is non-swappable battery and I'd have rather seen 3 GB Ram and 32 GB storage base, but should be fine for 8 months to a year.
It's an upgrade even coming from my S5.
Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk
I am coming from an SGH-I337 Galaxy S4 16gb. So far hardware wise it is an upgrade except for the screen. It has a very slight reddish yellow tint to it, not the crisp bluish white tint a galaxy has. Some people like it, I do not but I have heard it can be changed by rooting it. The only lag I have seen has been on websites with tons of graphics (slow to display pics when scrolling) other than that it is quick to move through screens and open apps. Have not tried any games. The finger print scanner is an awesome feature and works very well. I bought an unlocked N5X so it had nothing but bare bones Marshmallow 6 and it leaves a lot to be desired, if you were a custom to and used a lot of the apps that came with an S4 like gallery, memo, calendar, my files then you will need to find suitable replacements. The default keyboard in the messaging app has me all buggered right now, some genius thought it would be a good idea to put the microphone key right below the send key and for us fat fingered folks it is pretty much impossible to hit. I have not experienced any of the camera issues the N5X is notorious for yet, seems to run a little slow but nothing that is a show stopper.
Bottom line. Hardware is faster, screen is bigger with higher resolution, finger print reader is awesome, Marshmallow kind of sucks but that is my opinion, I bought it because it is a whole lot easier to root than the S4 and a whole lot easier to put custom ROMS on from what I have read. So far for me it is a trade off and the verdict is still out on whether I'm keeping it. Just wanted to offer my opinion because I know how much it sucks looking for a replacement with so many options avalible.
ajndede said:
Just wanted to offer my opinion because I know how much it sucks looking for a replacement with so many options avalible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My problem is the device I want if I am paying flagship prices nobody makes.
I want swappable battery, stock android, snappy performance, AMOLED, fingerprint sensor, high screen to phone ratio (small bezel). So the Nexus 6P with a removable battery, or a Note 5 or S6 with removable battery and stock android, or LG G5 with stock android and an OLED, etc etc... every device is missing something on my list.
Pulled trigger on the 5X yesterday, just have to set it up on Verizon when it arrives, also ordered nano sim cutter.
And in Fall 2016 I'll probably get the best 2016 phone I can that has a swappable battery and hopefully fingerprint sensor, probably the LG G5.
joelbnyc said:
My problem is the device I want if I am paying flagship prices nobody makes.
I want swappable battery, stock android, snappy performance, AMOLED, fingerprint sensor, high screen to phone ratio (small bezel). So the Nexus 6P with a removable battery, or a Note 5 or S6 with removable battery and stock android, or LG G5 with stock android and an OLED, etc etc... every device is missing something on my list.
Pulled trigger on the 5X yesterday, just have to set it up on Verizon when it arrives, also ordered nano sim cutter.
And in Fall 2016 I'll probably get the best 2016 phone I can that has a swappable battery and hopefully fingerprint sensor, probably the LG G5.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why order a nano sim cutter as opposed to simply going to a Verizon store to get a nano sim card for free?
But anyway, the N5X is definitely an upgrade over my previous S4. No question. Sure, it still has its quirks and bugs, but every phone does. Those aside, it's still a better phone overall. Especially for the price. The point made above about having a better IPS panel than the iPhone at half the price could be said for many of the features. When you think about it, it's quite impressive what you get for your money (by comparison of course).
Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk
plwalsh88 said:
Why order a nano sim cutter as opposed to simply going to a Verizon store to get a nano sim card for free?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Only $8 on amazon for aerb cutter and adapter, $4 more than the nano to micro adapter alone which I wanted anyway so I could save the S4 as a backup, and I kinda like diy projects anyway. Was pretty easy to cut.
I switched from a 16 GB S4 I9500 + 32GB SDcard to the 16GB 5X (take the 80$ rebate in NF)
Do I consider it an upgrade? Yes, definitely: More fluid, zero lag, Android 6.0.1 (+ Android 6.5 or 7.0 next Year), better battery optimizations, 4G LTE, Ambient Display (well, ocasionally), MAGNIFIC fingerprint sensor, easy to root/unroot, bye bye TouchWiz!
Will i miss the SD-slot? YES. 10 GB is not practical for store my MP3 Collection!
Will i miss the removable battery? yes, because I will have to resell my 5X in 1/2 years. With S4, a extra battery is only 8-15 $.
What I don't like from 5x?
- Poor speakerphone (very POOR) .
- MicroSD Slot, or 64 GB option
- USB-c port (I have to buy a USB-c to USB-a cable)
- Don't have earphones
- Poor devs support (for custom roms, Nexus 6P is more supported)
EeZeEpEe said:
It's an upgrade even coming from my S5.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, after just a day with it I can see this is true.
Display: Its great, no complaints whatsoever here, and coming from an amoled. The 5X colors do pop, just not quite in the radioactive way of galaxy amoleds. Colors are probably more accurate than an oversaturated amoled anyway, and I have an xrite calibrator eye if I want to mess with calibration.
OS: great, reminds me of my 2013 Nexus 7. No touchwiz, webpages load much quicker in chrome or firefox compared to S4. Nice to be back to stock android and know I can root easily if I want to. No problems popping in an activated cut down verizon sim either. Yet.
Fingerprint reader is awesome and a must for me on any mobile device going forward.
Performance seems just as snappy as the S6 floor models ive played with.
Got 1230 to 1290 single core and 3550 multi core geekbench 3. No noticeable lag yet. What sold me on the 5X other than xda was the youtubes where the guy opens a bunch of apps side by side on a 6P and 5X, there is one with a 5X vs S6 too, and the 5X does juuuust fine next to those.
Great phone, and at $330 i dont feel as cheated about non swappable battery as I would if I'd dropped $600 on a "flagship."
Oh and coming from an S4 i have no idea why reviews say the 5X doesnt feel "premium" or feels cheap. Anything but. The design is stylish and minimalist, and a case is going on anyway, but even without a case there is nothing wrong whatsoever with the industrial design and materials of this phone.
I do like the aluminum on my XPS 13 laptop, but whatever apple fanboy started the trend of 99% of tech reviewers saying every device that isn't 100% glass and metal feels "cheap" is nuts.
Yes it is a massive upgrade over the S4 which I still have one. In every way possible. The display on the S4 by today's standards is poor. The build quality is much better on the 5X.
joelbnyc said:
Yes, after just a day with it I can see this is true.
Display: Its great, no complaints whatsoever here, and coming from an amoled. The 5X colors do pop, just not quite in the radioactive way of galaxy amoleds. Colors are probably more accurate than an oversaturated amoled anyway, and I have an xrite calibrator eye if I want to mess with calibration.
OS: great, reminds me of my 2013 Nexus 7. No touchwiz, webpages load much quicker in chrome or firefox compared to S4. Nice to be back to stock android and know I can root easily if I want to. No problems popping in an activated cut down verizon sim either. Yet.
Fingerprint reader is awesome and a must for me on any mobile device going forward.
Performance seems just as snappy as the S6 floor models ive played with.
Got 1230 to 1290 single core and 3550 multi core geekbench 3. No noticeable lag yet. What sold me on the 5X other than xda was the youtubes where the guy opens a bunch of apps side by side on a 6P and 5X, there is one with a 5X vs S6 too, and the 5X does juuuust fine next to those.
Great phone, and at $330 i dont feel as cheated about non swappable battery as I would if I'd dropped $600 on a "flagship."
Oh and coming from an S4 i have no idea why reviews say the 5X doesnt feel "premium" or feels cheap. Anything but. The design is stylish and minimalist, and a case is going on anyway, but even without a case there is nothing wrong whatsoever with the industrial design and materials of this phone.
I do like the aluminum on my XPS 13 laptop, but whatever apple fanboy started the trend of 99% of tech reviewers saying every device that isn't 100% glass and metal feels "cheap" is nuts.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
God damn sir, well said. The phrasing at the end had me laughing lol. Good review from a more objective point of view opposed to the trolls lately.
jbdan said:
Yes it is a massive upgrade over the S4 which I still have one. In every way possible. The display on the S4 by today's standards is poor. The build quality is much better on the 5X.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's been only a couple days, but I'd probably pick the 5X over the Galaxy S6 so far, from what I've seen in stores. Especially if price is at all a factor, and maybe even if it isn't. My 5X is perfectly smooth, just the experience I was looking for. 1080P and stock android makes it perform better than QHD phones with bloatware.
I came from an S5 and I think it's a massive upgrade. I couldn't be happier with my purchase, personally.
The biggest things for me so far has been 1) Wireless ac (speeds are phenominal) and 2) no lag at all. I went through 2 S5's and both were laggy at times. I'm yet to see any of that with the 5x and I put it through its paces.
I think the camera output is much better, button layout is great (I had issues with accidentally hitting volume or power with S5's on both sides), and fingerprint reader is amazing.
I switched from Verizon to Project Fi last week also. Couldn't be happier with that as well. Going to cut my bill in half.
Luckily I haven't seemed to have any of the issues other are having here on the forums.
joelbnyc said:
The 5X colors do pop, just not quite in the radioactive way of galaxy amoleds.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL radioactive is a pretty good description. So not natural looking when I compared with the S5 side by side.
Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk
UnderXP said:
What I don't like from 5x?
- Poor devs support (for custom roms, Nexus 6P is more supported)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is not necessarily the truth. There are plenty of ROMs and kernels for Bullhead. Some teams, like mine, just do not release until everything is tip-top.
I have the 16gb tmoblie variant S4 w a 64 gb card, which still has 30 gb free so I really didn't need 64gb after all, the 32 I had was sufficient. It just leads to hoarding too much crap on my phone. I have almost 100 albums on it I barely listen to for example, and TB backups from 4 years ago of **** that isn't even in the play store anymore lmao...
I got the 32gb from the Google store because 16gb is an insult and should be illegal in 2015. Even if you don't have 1gb+ games it gets eaten up fast.
The one thing I love the most about switching is not having to fight with that damn internal memory card partition anymore. What the actual **** was that about anyway? Thank god for Link2SD...
The camera is a bazillion times better, and the FULL camera2 api is the icing on the cake.
I will say that I beat the absolute hell out of that S4 and the screen never broke. It looks like the dog chewed the edges but that's it. Time will tell if the 5X can withstand my butterfingers as well!
Another note, I installed Fleksy keyboard and added the number row so the on screen keyboard resembles what im used to with Galaxy S series, i dont like having to long hold or hit the 123 key to get to numbers.
Fleksy seems to use more ram than it needs though, so i might look for other options. Google keyboard with the PC layout and number row makes the keys too tiny.
Google should just add an option to include a number row in the stock keyboard.
joelbnyc said:
Another note, I installed Fleksy keyboard and added the number row so the on screen keyboard resembles what im used to with Galaxy S series, i dont like having to long hold or hit the 123 key to get to numbers.
Fleksy seems to use more ram than it needs though, so i might look for other options. Google keyboard with the PC layout and number row makes the keys too tiny.
Google should just add an option to include a number row in the stock keyboard.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
SwiftKey does a number row.
Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

so buy oneplus 3 or nexus 6p ?

i want to buy new phone after nexus 4 so should buy one plus 3 or nexus 6p and why
Oneplus 3. Nexus is quite a bit more expensive and doesn't provide too many goods to make it worth the price.
Wait for the OnePlus 3T (to be announced this 15th november).
- https://techcrunch.com/2016/11/09/oneplus-4/
- http://www.techradar.com/news/oneplus-3t-launch-all-but-confirmed-for-november-15-launch
Demian3112 said:
Oneplus 3. Nexus is quite a bit more expensive and doesn't provide too many goods to make it worth the price.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its quite the same price around 400$
ahmedvip2008 said:
its quite the same price around 400$
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The 64GB variant it €490 here.
ahmedvip2008 said:
its quite the same price around 400$
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Even at the same price I'd still recommend the OnePlus 3. It's more future proof in terms of specs and currently has one of the biggest communities of developers actively working on it. And even if you do decide to stick with OxygenOS, it's pretty damn close to stock Android anyways.
grufwub said:
Even at the same price I'd still recommend the OnePlus 3. It's more future proof in terms of specs and currently has one of the biggest communities of developers actively working on it. And even if you do decide to stick with OxygenOS, it's pretty damn close to stock Android anyways.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so if the company stop supporting the device the developers will still support 6p is that also with 1+3
i have nexus 4 and dev still support it with android 7.1
ahmedvip2008 said:
so if the company stop supporting the device the developers will still support 6p is that also with 1+3
i have nexus 4 and dev still support it with android 7.1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ofc the only benefit of buying a nexus device is that google provides new android version half a year before any other brand and all other devices must wait till source gets released. but other than that the hardware is not good enough. if you are not into high performance games and want allways newest android version first then go for nexus. but you get better hardware for better cost if you go for oneplus ( buy oneplus3 t)
nadejo said:
ofc the only benefit of buying a nexus device is that google provides new android version half a year before any other brand and all other devices must wait till source gets released. but other than that the hardware is not good enough. if you are not into high performance games and want allways newest android version first then go for nexus. but you get better hardware for better cost if you go for oneplus ( buy oneplus3 t)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Couldn't have put it better myself
I have both. There are a few things that may sway a decision. The 6P has nougat source and the available 7.X ROMs reflect that. This isn't a shot at anyone developing here, they just don't have it, or even a stock base to work with. If you like back fingerprint scanners you might lean toward the Nexus, if you're like me and don't that would favor the 3. Updates favor the 6 as mentioned already. The 3 is easier to handle without the massive bezels. The speakerphone through the 6 is very loud if need be and can be easily heard over background noise like a TV. In that regard the 3 is not bad at all but is outgunned by the 6 speakers.
For myself I was tired of keeping up two phones and wanted to move to a dual SIM. That combined with the fact that after several backside fingerprint scanners I'm starting to hate them the move was an easy one to make. I don't miss the 6P, it was and is a great device but the 3 is punching well above its cost.
krabman said:
I have both. There are a few things that may sway a decision. The 6P has nougat source and the available 7.X ROMs reflect that. This isn't a shot at anyone developing here, they just don't have it, or even a stock base to work with. If you like back fingerprint scanners you might lean toward the Nexus, if you're like me and don't that would favor the 3. Updates favor the 6 as mentioned already. The 3 is easier to handle without the massive bezels. The speakerphone through the 6 is very loud if need be and can be easily heard over background noise like a TV. In that regard the 3 is not bad at all but is outgunned by the 6 speakers.
For myself I was tired of keeping up two phones and wanted to move to a dual SIM. That combined with the fact that after several backside fingerprint scanners I'm starting to hate them the move was an easy one to make. I don't miss the 6P, it was and is a great device but the 3 is punching well above its cost.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what is the best screen for reading or watching videos
ahmedvip2008 said:
what is the best screen for reading or watching videos
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if it was for reading and watching video content I prefer 6p. bigger screen, bigger resolution, dual facing speakers
I had the same dilemma, but couldn't get hold of a 6p so went for the op3. Awesome phone with new community builds coming thick and fast. I love mine :laugh:
Nexus 6p all day, every day. Better camera, better quality, better software better battery, better everything.
I think you forgot the hardware in nexus it's sucks
Sent from my OnePlus 3 using XDA Labs
tixoo said:
Nexus 6p all day, every day. Better camera, better quality, better software better battery, better everything.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude you can be a fanboy but don't lie... The 6P has a better camera, screen with dual front facing speakers and that's about it. The OnePlus 3 trump's it in battery life, it destroys it in absolute performance and is much quicker, has much more RAM that can be used without the processor overheating (S810 overheats like crazy, if someone says otherwise, they do not know what they are talking about). The OP3 doesn't snap in half like a cookie when bent, not to mention the fact that the rear glass over the camera cracks extremely easily. The fingerprint scanner is WAY faster on the OP3 Than the 6P. Camera in daylight is better but low light the 6P Is better, but the difference is surprisingly low. For OP, if you are any sort of power user at all and you do a lot of multi tasking or gaming for example, you will have to get the OP3 as the 6P slows down massive as the CPU goes from using the A57 core at 2.0ghz to not being able to use them and going to the garbage A53 cores to do the task which lead to lag and stutter. Not to mention when browsing the 6P is locked to the A53 cores because it'd overheat otherwise and because of this browsing is super slow. Last but not least, the OP3 beats it in audio quality outputted from the headphone jack, it's louder and has wider soundstage while sounding more crisp (you can really notice it in the base) and clean
vagelis74 said:
I think you forgot the hardware in nexus it's sucks
Sent from my OnePlus 3 using XDA Labs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
why because processor ?!
Yes my nexus 6p here in Greece the summer easy frizz eggs
Sent from my OnePlus 3 using XDA Labs
Both dope phones boils down to (no pun intended) SD810 vs SD820 and fastest updates + source vs delayed updates + source
Personal preference really if updates matter to you go for the 6P if not will not be disappointed by the OP3
I had a 6P and switched to the Oneplus 3. I was sick of carrying an iPhone 6s for work and a 6P for my personal line. The dual sim capability is incredibly convenient but I would imagine not something that most people end up needing. Other than that here are my thoughts:
Speakers: 6P. If only for the placement. Maybe I am holding it wrong but I always seem to cover up my speaker when holding the phone in landscape mode. It sounds just fine otherwise. Most of the time I use earbuds anyway.
Camera: Tie. No real world difference for me. Both are great.
Fingerprint Sensor: OP3. Location is better when it's sitting on my desk, screen side up. It is also much faster than the 6P.
Buttons: OP3. I HATED the volume rocker location on the 6P. I was constantly changing volume when holding the phone in portrait mode and typing or whatever. This really annoyed the sh!t out of me. Also having the volume buttons on the opposite side of of the power button is better in my opinion. The notification slider is convenient, too.
Signal Strength: OP3 easily. I have a T-Mobile sim in sim1 and Verizon in sim2. The reception on T-Mobile sim is certainly better on the OP3. Not the case with the Verizon sim because of band compatability.
Feel: OP3. This thing feels more premium than the 6P...if that matters to you. It's also easier to hold.
Software: 6P. For the speed and guarantee of updates but OP3 Nougat will make this a tie. Nova Launcher though. And I don't care for rooting and ROMs anymore.
Screen: 6P? Yes it's more clear but really the OP3 screen is all I need in terms of size and resolutionw. One thing the 6P has going for it though is a totally flat screen. This makes screen protectors easier to apply without the ring around the edges.
Battery: OP3. Probably due to screen size and resolution. Also probably due to the reception being better. And Dash Charging is faster than Rapid Charging on the Nexus.
If I think of more, I will add to this post.

Question Is it worth it?

My current phone, a Google Pixel 3 XL, needs to replaced pretty soon as the USB port is somewhat broken and replacing it does not seem to really be worth it, due to some other things (brightness, camera, etc.) I am annoyed of.
I have been eying the new Sony smartphones for a while now and I am not sure whether it is really worth the 400€. My other choice would be a Samsung A52 5G and now I am wondering what you guys think about this Sony phone so far.
- Is the camera really as bad as the reviews suggest?
- Is the display bright enough to (properly) use it in the sun?
- etc.
cheers,
fd
I don't mind the camera. Though, I upgraded from an aging Sony Xperia XZ1c, so it's has a fair few more features than I am used to. I know that the Pixel line has historically had great pictures due to a combination of lenses and implementation/software. The implementation is where Sony lacks (especially on the Auto side). But... I don't often use my camera, so I don't often notice any issues with the results. It's fine for me!
I have not had much issue with display brightness in sun.. it is noticeably dim, but certainly not unusable.
Depending on your location in the world, you may want to check band support on the device and cross reference with with your country/carrier. The US is limited, the rest of the world may not be as much.
On paper, the Samsung A52 looks better, but I haven't looked much in to it. Around the same price, you may be able to find some deals on a Google Pixel 4a 5g if you want to stay with the Pixel line.
To me, the 10 III was worth it. I don't need flagship features, and the short comings don't bother me. I've used Sony devices for the past 12 years, and appreciate their effort to remain in the mobile space despite lacking sales. I think the 21:9 is pretty cool and works really well for the endless scrolling most folks do. The narrow width of the device is what I like most; it's the same width as my old XZ1c, but a bit taller.
I realize this is all a bit subjective to personal experience, but that's just how it is.
Hope this helps!
I've got this phone almost entirely due to the lack of a notch or some other obstruction to the display, and because of that aspect alone, I consider it worth it. The other good thing is Sony's Open Devices program, of which this device will hopefully be a part soon, opening up the possibilities for Sailfish OS, Ubports, etc. if that's your kind of thing.
But if you don't care about these additional features, then you can probably find a better bang-for-buck device without much effort. Especially if you don't get the wireless headphones deal from Sony.
Can't really say anything about the camera as I don't use it all that often (if it takes pictures, it's sufficient for me). Also not sure about the screen visibility in the sun as due to the pandemic I mostly stay inside anyways (working from home).
I am coming from Xperia XZ1 compact... the 10 III is only slightly bigger, and again a good device for outdoor use. Still water/dust resist, extremely fast and accurate position fix, display is perfectly bright outside, and due to the 12:9 format, you can hold, carry and operate it very good with just one hand. Performance is outstanding, of course - battery runtime is good.
No issues with the camera. Sure you will get an even better camera when you pay three time of what it costs, but for the price I would call it a very good device, worth every penny. Especially, I find the telephoto lense very useful. Sharp and natural pictures.
Magisk is working fine.
OP, I probably go with the Samsung. It supports a shared SD card slot, yes a data drive ie a dual drive handheld is now possible for you.
Used correctly this feature will become indispensable. All critical data goes on the SD card; OS, apps and temporary files on internal memory. You simple backup from the SD card then. When doing a reset factory you can reload everything from the SD card; no cloud, Playstore or PC needed. Hell yeah.
Samsung's are the most customizable stock Androids on the planet. Hundreds of free theme and icon packs on the Galaxy Store.
Samsung's tech support just plain sucks leaches on your ball sack bad though. If you're Android fluent this will not be an issue more than likely.
Sony tech support is no gem either
Samsung's tend to be bright but you should never use a AMOLED display in direct sunlight!!!
Samsung is at top with displays. This one could be a bit brighter... and live a shorter life.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Smartphone Review - Another chapter in a success story
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G comes with a Snapdragon 750G, 6 GB of RAM, 128 GB of internal memory, microSD card support, an IP67 cerfication and a large 4500-mAh battery. However, the main feature of the Korean smartphone is a quad-camera system with a 64-MP main sensor.
www.notebookcheck.net
The newer Samsung cams are good, I have a Note 10+ and it captures great images.
Play with both first. Seeing them in person is worth a thousand pictures...
A comparison:
Compare Sony Xperia 10 III vs. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G - GSMArena.com
m.gsmarena.com
Read more reviews on both.
Consider a used flagship model in excellent condition. Most Samsung batteries aren't that hard to replace.
Android 11 sucks, Pie is still my preferred weapon. So with a new phone you're stuck with 11 and it's lame CPU cycle eating scoped storage. Pie is still quit secure.. don't buy into the scare hype.
blackhawk said:
A comparison:
Compare Sony Xperia 10 III vs. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G - GSMArena.com
m.gsmarena.com
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think it really depends on what to do with it.
For me, the main pro's for the 10 III: Corning 6 instead of 5, slimmer and more lightweight - perfect for outdoor use. With the Samsung, I had issues with the size of my pockets and my hand ;-)
oel7 said:
I think it really depends on what to do with it.
For me, the main pro's for the 10 III: Corning 6 instead of 5, slimmer and more lightweight - perfect for outdoor use. With the Samsung, I had issues with the size of my pockets and my hand ;-)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The glass difference isn't much between 5 and 6 unless you drop it without a good case.
With no case don't think Corning 6 will save it... it's still glass.
Both are readily scratched by sand.

Question P20 Pro upgrade? Was thinking Pixel 7 but now not sure..

With the Pixel 7 potentially using the older A76 core architecture instead of the more efficient A78s has me looking at different devices. I'm upgrading from a Huawei P20 Pro that has been fantastic for battery life and a good camera https://tutuapp.uno/ ]https://vidmate.cool/.
Any recommendations for a upgrade? I don't require a flagship but open to that option. My main criteria is a 6-6.4" screen.
Note 10+, 60hz AMOLED but it exceeds probably all the new variable refresh rate displays in color and gamma accuracy. It's a gorgeous display. Up to 1tb of fast V30 rated expandable storage. Bt Spen. It's a beast and a solid workhorse that runs like a bat out of hell. Newer phones are only marginally faster for most tasks.
New and used are available.
sasaki11 said:
With the Pixel 7 potentially using the older A76 core architecture instead of the more efficient A78s has me looking at different devices. I'm upgrading from a Huawei P20 Pro that has been fantastic for battery life and a good camera.
Any recommendations for a upgrade? I don't require a flagship but open to that option. My main criteria is a 6-6.4" screen.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
blackhawk said:
Note 10+, 60hz AMOLED but it exceeds probably all the new variable refresh rate displays in color and gamma accuracy. It's a gorgeous display. Up to 1tb of fast V30 rated expandable storage. Bt Spen. It's a beast and a solid workhorse that runs like a bat out of hell. Newer phones are only marginally faster for most tasks.
New and used are available.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed: go Sammy or or a Chinese mark with highest specs, not a Pixel. If you're concerned with minutiae in benchmarks, etc.then you know you won't be happy when you get it.
Pixel is more about the Google experience which is extremely comfortable and something fans rely on.
Personally, I wouldn't touch a Samsung or latest-spec-Chinese-brand with a ten foot pole because their speed, rich screens, etc don't mean anything to me for my tasks that I rely on and their UI and UX is extremely annoying to the point that they become literally unusuable and I end up selling or returning them sometimes within 1 day.
So, yeah, stick with what you know makes you happy and don't change.
FoneWatcher said:
Agreed: go Sammy or or a Chinese mark with highest specs, not a Pixel. If you're concerned with minutiae in benchmarks, etc.then you know you won't be happy when you get it.
Pixel is more about the Google experience which is extremely comfortable and something fans rely on.
Personally, I wouldn't touch a Samsung or latest-spec-Chinese-brand with a ten foot pole because their speed, rich screens, etc don't mean anything to me for my tasks that I rely on and their UI and UX is extremely annoying to the point that they become literally unusuable and I end up selling or returning them sometimes within 1 day.
So, yeah, stick with what you know makes you happy and don't change.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't recommend the newer Samsung's. The Note 9 is noticeably slower than the N10+.
All Samsung's should be optimized for best results. One UI is fast, stable and very customizable stock, one of Samsung's hallmarks. They can be a handful until you understand them... which takes time. Of course there's iPhone on the other extreme but you may die of boredom and the one size fits all blandness...
I've heard good things so far about the Motorola 30 Edge Ultra (reviews should be coming out pretty soon). It's £750 in UK which looks really good value for 200mp main camera phone and Snapdragon processor gen 1

Categories

Resources