You Can Now Test Without Hacking Your Phone
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/os/2.5/
Just takes me to firefox os help page :/
Related
hello buddy
i just want ask if i can remove the WM 6.5 All of it
and i put the android os
without bot from wm to android
Hi.
No, you have to let WM 6.x to boot Haret.exe from your favorite file browser
WinningDays said:
Hi.
No, you have to let WM 6.x to boot Haret.exe from your favorite file browser
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
u mean there is no chance to change the OS from the phone >> or for now ?
Booting Android/Linux on a WinMo device is close to try to run Mac OS on a PC.
It might be possible, but not now.
We have to hope that an Android ROM will come someday, but the developpers work hard to fix the main problems
WinningDays said:
Booting Android/Linux on a WinMo device is close to try to run Mac OS on a PC.
It might be possible, but not now.
We have to hope that an Android ROM will come someday, but the developpers work hard to fix the main problems
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok thx we have to hope coz its nice MOS
i think i will buy nexus one
and sell BLAAKKK STONNE
Couldn't this have been asked in the existing Q&A thread????
Thread closed
Google says android 4.4 kitkat is available for everyone. So is it means we can flash it directly to our galaxy w?
Now our smartphones become a mini computers.
in dekstop computers we can install a new os(linux or windows) directly. The OS recognize the drivers then install them directly or from the web. Maybe some of hardwares drivers cant find but its very rare issue.
So why android doesnt like this. Thats everybody install new version of android and its install the phones drivers directly or from the internet.
The smartphones hardware manufacturers less than dekstop computers hardware manufacturers but dekstop computers OS can do it well and avaliable for every kind of computer.
Why Android OS install like dekstop computers OS.
pharatlil said:
Google says android 4.4 kitkat is available for everyone. So is it means we can flash it directly to our galaxy w?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, it needs to be ported.
pharatlil said:
in dekstop computers we can install a new os(linux or windows) directly. The OS recognize the drivers then install them directly or from the web. Maybe some of hardwares drivers cant find but its very rare issue.
So why android doesnt like this. Thats everybody install new version of android and its install the phones drivers directly or from the internet.
The smartphones hardware manufacturers less than dekstop computers hardware manufacturers but dekstop computers OS can do it well and avaliable for every kind of computer.
Why Android OS install like dekstop computers OS.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is just partially true. Windows and Linux for desktop PCs already come with most of the drivers directly on the CD or DVD or at least with hardware IDs for the drivers they can download and install via internet.
Your ROM simply isn´t about the same size like a Linux or Windows DVD It also doesn´t have a 100GB HD, a DVD drive and at least 4GB RAM installed.
So if you want an Android that is about as easy to install on all devices, you would have to make it about that big in size like a Linux or a Windows installation DVD which most of the devices couldn´t handle.
That´s why it needs to be ported with just the drivers for your specific device. And this is also the advantage to keep it as small and slick as possible.
Most of linux os about 1gb.
Windows is about 1-2 gn. Not about 100gb.
İ ha ve a galaxy s3 and stock rom about 900mb.
İf google want to give latest firmwares every device They can make a pc program and it finds devices specs automatically.
Samsung, htc, lg...etc.. maybe dont want to give newest firmwares to older devices for selling new devices.
But why google dont make roms for every device. Android is a linux based os and linuxs difference is its avaliable for everyone. So i think googles s strategy about android isnt true. İt must be same way with linux.
pharatlil said:
Most of linux os about 1gb.
Windows is about 1-2 gn. Not about 100gb.
İ ha ve a galaxy s3 and stock rom about 900mb.
İf google want to give latest firmwares every device They can make a pc program and it finds devices specs automatically.
Samsung, htc, lg...etc.. maybe dont want to give newest firmwares to older devices for selling new devices.
But why google dont make roms for every device. Android is a linux based os and linuxs difference is its avaliable for everyone. So i think googles s strategy about android isnt true. İt must be same way with linux.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A totally fresh installed Windows 7 already is taking about 4GB on your HD and needs a way bigger partition to get installed at all.
Android is not a linux based rom. It´s a Java based ROM. Only the kernel is linux and this needs to be compiled first and match your hardware to make it able for the rom to work at.
Google only offers the basic code for a ROM but the rest must be added by the manufacturers. Beside this linux also wasn´t that userfriendly like it is now. The very first releases even didn´t use an UI. All had to be done on command line. Was meant to be used on servers but not for end users and though it was open source it took about 20 years from this stage to become an userfirendly OS for endusers like Windows.
So this is like comparing apples with pears. Best you ask Google and see what they will answer you.
İm disagree with you. or i couldnt explain well.
There in not more hardware manufacterers than PCs. But dekstop computers OS can handle it. For example i have got a hp compaq nx8220 notebook. its very old pc but i intalled windows 8 and its running very well. There is no drivers for windows 8 but windows have a feature for it. İ install many drivers in compatibility mode. ( Yes HP didnt publish a driver for it but windows's this compatibility feature solve the problem.)
Im not a developer but i know programming dialectic (i wrote programs in q basic and gw basic but i stay away from programming because of my job.) im interested about java and c++ and im learning. im seeing that developers main problem to porting Android to a device is hardware drivers. İf manufacterer give codes they port it easier.
İ want to say my hp compaq nx8220 is very old device but its runs with windows 8 very stable.
But my old phone and and my wifes phone galaxy w isnt a old device but they r saying your device cant runs properly with android's newest OS. It has 512 mb ram and 1,4ghz processor.??? (my notebook worst but runs w8)
Maybe one day some developers agree with my opinion and work with hardware drivers than making alot of custom roms. So maybe one day we enter a web page (for example cyanogenmod web page)and flash newest rom like installing a newest OS to a PC.
You may agree or disagree. No problem with that. It´s just you are comparing apples with pears. An Android Phone isn´t the same like a PC. Doesn´t have a HD or something equial to this in its capacity and so on. Neither Android, Firefox OS or Ubuntu Touch do have such an installer included that will install the Operating System on all devices. They all need to be ported. The same even for Windows Phone. So rather than arguing with me, go out and ask all the big players like Google, Ubuntu, Firefox or Microsoft why this isn´t the same like fo a PC.
Hi guys,
I just tried to install Firefox OS on my Fairphone. I followed the instructions at:
developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Firefox_OS/Firefox_OS_build_prerequisites
When it comes to "Configuring the B2G build for a mobile device" (see developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Firefox_OS/Preparing_for_your_first_B2G_build), I don't know what to do.
The fairphone doesn't appear in the list of the supported devices.
Can anyone help me? Has anyone further information about the Fairphone being supported by Mozilla?
Thanks in advance!
Check this, the problem:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=51272776&postcount=556
MediaTek driver sourcecode (want custom ROMs? read this!): http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2636257
alnico87 said:
Has anyone further information about the Fairphone being supported by Mozilla?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Fairphone is definitely NOT a supported device by Mozilla and doubt it will ever receive official support by mozilla. They are focusing on a small set of devices and sometimes it even seems hard for Geeksphone to even get support for their official, Mozilla endorsed "Developer Preview" Phones (see the Geeksphone forums and B2G bug reports).
That said, the Fairphone people seem quite engaged and Firefox OS is making great progress in some areas. The might someday be an unofficial version of Firefox OS you might be able to compile and install on the Fairphone. The issues mentioned by the poster above will have to be sorted out for that to happen.
Okay, thank you guys so much!
It's a pitty that it isn't clear whether, when and how the fairphone may run Firefox OS.
But I see,
the Fairphone people seem quite engaged and Firefox OS is making great progress in some areas
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hi!
I wonder if there's someone that want to port Tizen OS to our device
Tizen is the only real alternative OS for the Ace 2 because:
Ubuntu Touch: too small /system partition
Sailfish: hardest OS to port and gesture based ( it would make the hardware keys useless)
Firefox OS: it uses only the centre hardware key
Tizen uses Html5 apps and it's not Java based, so i think in would run better than Android
Also Tizen has already native clients for Facebook, Messenger, WhatsApp, Instagram and more....
I hope that someone will try to port this OS for this great device, thanks in advance!
PS: sorry for my "English".
Hey guys we need to have deep web access x and I know its not easy but if any one could translate and port tor browser into appx it will happen .
Its open source and windows 10 mobile is able to open ported application of that ...
For access depp webs we just need tor browser and a vpn we can have both just we need someone to translate that
Source :
www.torproject.org