Related
Sorry for the total noob question here, but how long do you think it will take for Cynogen 10 to be release for this phone? This is my first I have bought a phone at launch.
My best guess, month or two
http://www.cyanogenmod.org/blog/cyanogenmod-10-m2
Says galaxy note this month but I'm not sure if that includes the note 2
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 using xda premium
I thought Cyanogenmod isn't supporting the Note 2?
Sent from my SGH-I317M using xda premium
Noooo! This is a beast of a phone. They must :\
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 using xda app-developers app
Looks like they are supporting the International version. http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/articles/4...android412-jellybean-samsung-galaxy-note2.htm
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 using xda app-developers app
So by supporting the International version does that mean that US versions such as AT&T will not work with the same version of Cyanogen?
kryptonx said:
Sorry for the total noob question here, but how long do you think it will take for Cynogen 10 to be release for this phone? This is my first I have bought a phone at launch.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CyanogenMod 10? That's easy... Two Weeks TM
CM10
I am assuming soon (I hope) as you can pre-order a case cruzerlite.com/pre-order-cyanogenmod-case-for-samsung-galaxy-note-ii
djben75 said:
I am assuming soon (I hope) as you can pre-order a case cruzerlite.com/pre-order-cyanogenmod-case-for-samsung-galaxy-note-ii
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The only way CM will come to this device is if someone who knows how to setup a device tree does it. They don't just magically appear guys. I'm working on the tree for the t0lteatt at the moment, but its an on going process. I've built, modded, compiled, you name it, done it, however never setup a device tree from scratch.
antiochasylum said:
The only way CM will come to this device is if someone who knows how to setup a device tree does it. They don't just magically appear guys. I'm working on the tree for the t0lteatt at the moment, but its an on going process. I've built, modded, compiled, you name it, done it, however never setup a device tree from scratch.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On XDA they do, are you sure man? :laugh: No but seriously I hope it isn't that difficult since all Note 2's are the same (mostly). Wish I know more about android.
Patiently waiting, for now
Im working on porting CyanogenMod to the T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note 3.
I have the CM source code and I have been experimenting with all sorts of files and reading build and porting guides BUT to no avail.
Without the proper blobs, I have found this to be an impossible task.
Looking for a few people who are interested in giving me a hand doing this without the blobs.
^I had to clarify this just so everyone was on the same page.^
You can reach me here on XDA.
geekcentercreations said:
Im working on porting CyanogenMod to the T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note 3. I have the CM source code and I have been experimenting with all sorts of files and reading build and porting guides BUT to no avail. Looking for a few people who are interested in giving me a hand doing this.
You can reach me on twitter (nikkdotcom) or skype (nikolas_pereira1) or here on XDA.
Looking forward to some good teamwork!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sure count me in
the cm guys (behind closed doors) only have call mic not working , the rest is working, i figured with 4.4 the note3 development got halted , wanted to work on it about a month ago but was told "stuff will be shared once its working" ..
last i checked they had a kernel up .. no blobs list nothing .
DAGr8 said:
sure count me in
the cm guys (behind closed doors) only have call mic not working , the rest is working, i figured with 4.4 the note3 development got halted , wanted to work on it about a month ago but was told "stuff will be shared once its working" ..
last i checked they had a kernel up .. no blobs list nothing .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Get in touch with me on Skype or Twitter. Im working on this right now. My info is in the OP.
I cant wait to see progress
Sent from my SM-N900T
@geekcentercreations I added you.. What's your github? Gtalk would be better or irc. . When I'm around
Sent from my SM-N900W8 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
You guys rock!
So glad to see some activity on this from community members! I would help, but have no computer available to me, nor the knowledge to even attempt this.
You guys are the best!
If you need testers, let me know. I LOVE messing with my phone!!
^^Same here. Will test any of it on my tmo note 3
Sent from my SM-N900T
After try many edit rom of Note 3, I prefer to original rom by Samsung for stablility.
Sent from my Note 3 using Tapatalk
iamwrong said:
After try many edit rom of Note 3, I prefer to original rom by Samsung for stablility.
Sent from my Note 3 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OK, then you keep using stock from Samsung.
MANY people are waiting for CM10/11 though. I just want to be able to unleash this phones true potential.
I'm up for building and testing. I'd really love to get OmniROM running on the Note 3 so if you have a device tree repository set I'd be interested in it.
Sent from my SM-N900T using xda app-developers app
CalcProgrammer1 said:
I'm up for building and testing. I'd really love to get OmniROM running on the Note 3 so if you have a device tree repository set I'd be interested in it.
Sent from my SM-N900T using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Check This Out. https://github.com/utkanos/android_device_samsung_hltetmo
Also do a general search on github for "android_device_samsung_hltetmo" (without quotes of course)
My github is here. Has some files in there but not too much. Would love some more people to contribute.
https://github.com/nikkdotcom/android_device_samsung_hltetmo
DAGr8 said:
@geekcentercreations I added you.. What's your github? Gtalk would be better or irc. . When I'm around
Sent from my SM-N900W8 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://github.com/nikkdotcom/android_device_samsung_hltetmo
You won't find anything on git hub ... cm brought n3 development behind closed doors...
fun stuff.
Sent from my SM-N900W8 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
DAGr8 said:
You won't find anything on git hub ... cm brought n3 development behind closed doors...
fun stuff.
Sent from my SM-N900W8 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This new corporate sellout version of CyanogenMod sucks big time, throw all their community spirit out the window for the chance to profit off open source software. Sad state of affairs indeed, especially trying to lie and cheat devs into relicensing GPL software so they could sell it to third parties. What the heck CM team?
Sent from my SM-N900T using xda app-developers app
I was scared of this happening to the android root community. Things went from fun open community development to whatever the hell is going on now. I miss when it was like 7 people working the same type of rom for the same phone and having options. TOUCHWIZ SUUUUUUUUUUCKS. I'm dying for some aosp or aokp for this beast
nighthawk626 said:
I was scared of this happening to the android root community. Things went from fun open community development to whatever the hell is going on now. I miss when it was like 7 people working the same type of rom for the same phone and having options. TOUCHWIZ SUUUUUUUUUUCKS. I'm dying for some aosp or aokp for this beast
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I really want Paranoid Android for this beast but CM is easier to build. Easier to build if I could figure it out that is
geekcentercreations said:
I really want Paranoid Android for this beast but CM is easier to build. Easier to build if I could figure it out that is
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm with you on that, I need that halo back.
Sent from my SM-N900T using xda app-developers app
Actually omni pa pac aokp slim whatever rom type u prefer..
All we need is the proper blobs to be used .. The device tree from one rom to another don't differ much
That's the hard part .. cm will share once it works. That's for sure. .
Ofc we can hate on them for not sharing truth is if making this work was an intermediate level of difficulty we would already have aosp based on our phone ..
Sent from my SM-N900W8 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Pulled the source code for the T-Mobile Note 3 from the Sammy website (Model #N900T).
Includes the kernel and platform source folders.
Download and play....or fix.....your choice.
Link is from Google Drive and can be downloaded below.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5BEzKcGiwjpN1plb2t1U1JZbGM/edit?usp=sharing
Cool. DL now. Hopefully can use this to figure out wifi-calling.
Finally, AOSP here we come
I thought source code was released back on October 4th?
idtheftvictim said:
I thought source code was released back on October 4th?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It was released a while ago. I just didn't see it uploaded here and some of the stuff in the kernel and platform folders can be useful to people for tinkering or fixing so I uploaded.
idtheftvictim said:
I thought source code was released back on October 4th?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well awesome! Thank you so much dude! How is AOSP coming along? Any progress?
Sent from my SM-N900T using xda app-developers app
I know this question is out of this thread, but anyone knows when kikat be available for note 3??
Sent from my SM-N900T using xda premium
I'm finally going to try and tinker with this
Sent from my SM-N900T using xda app-developers app
iakeco said:
I'm finally going to try and tinker with this
Sent from my SM-N900T using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i wish i knew HOW to tinker with this! lol
do you need a linux box to build a rom and/or kernel or is it something that can be done just as well on a windows box?
chipis said:
I know this question is out of this thread, but anyone knows when kikat be available for note 3??
Sent from my SM-N900T using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if you know that it has nothing to do with this thread then why ask? And if your asking about a touchwiz 4.4 no one knows samsung usually takes forever to do this. For example they just started rolling out 4.3 for the note 2 so my guess would be about a year lol. And as for a AOSP KitKat...yet again no one knows btw never ask for ETA's
geekcentercreations said:
Pulled the source code for the T-Mobile Note 3 from the Sammy website (Model #N900T).
Includes the kernel and platform source folders.
Download and play....or fix.....your choice.
Link is from Google Drive and can be downloaded below.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5BEzKcGiwjpN1plb2t1U1JZbGM/edit?usp=sharing
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I downloaded this from Sammy a few weeks back, and I was struck by how little is there. Yes, the full kernel sources are there - though of course a lot of stuff is still hidden in binary firmware blobs (presumably the TIMA/KNOX interface falls in this category). What struck me though was how little *platform* stuff is there. Is anyone else surprised by this? I would've thought they built more of their work on open-source foundations, but maybe not.
Is becoming more TizenOS with each new phone if you ask me
Sent from my SM-N900T using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Qwallace70129 said:
Is becoming more TizenOS with each new phone if you ask me
Sent from my SM-N900T using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can agree with this.
pyrilium said:
I downloaded this from Sammy a few weeks back, and I was struck by how little is there. Yes, the full kernel sources are there - though of course a lot of stuff is still hidden in binary firmware blobs (presumably the TIMA/KNOX interface falls in this category). What struck me though was how little *platform* stuff is there. Is anyone else surprised by this? I would've thought they built more of their work on open-source foundations, but maybe not.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well you have to remember, 4.3 Samsung is 4.3 samsung. If you ever looked inside the apks, there is a ton of stuff not used. Reason that's so, it's more generic across devices.
The only real changes are drivers/libs. A lot of those get pulled from the device when building anyway.
As far as I've ever seen, an individual cannot build a lib. You cannot reverse engineer them. Nothing.
If the specific libs needed to make things work are not available, then they just won't work yet. It's that plain an simple. I've helped out a lot in source building threads.
I wish it was easier, but sadly it's not.
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk 2
cbucz24 said:
Well you have to remember, 4.3 Samsung is 4.3 samsung. If you ever looked inside the apks, there is a ton of stuff not used. Reason that's so, it's more generic across devices.
The only real changes are drivers/libs. A lot of those get pulled from the device when building anyway.
As far as I've ever seen, an individual cannot build a lib. You cannot reverse engineer them. Nothing.
If the specific libs needed to make things work are not available, then they just won't work yet. It's that plain an simple. I've helped out a lot in source building threads.
I wish it was easier, but sadly it's not.
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I've done a lot of work administering standard linux machines and it's a completely different world. They may be using an open-source core OS, but it's clear that none of the vendors treat their development itself as a process that contributes to free software.
By libs, do you mean the kernel modules and/or binary firmware blobs that are needed to support different bits of hardware? Or actual system libraries? I guess in this case, both are frequently closed. I heard a couple months back that the Android lead engineer at Google actually stepped down over the issue of OEM-supplied firmware blobs - specifically how un-transparent the process is, and how it's hard to even get access to the binaries for distribution, let alone the source D:
I have 4.4.2 source. Github. Linux building environment. Now I'm making a stock ROM to upload to XDA. Anyone with time to explain how to do so. All info accepted (-_-).
Sent from my SM-N900T using xda app-developers app
Since it appears I am the only one to build (working) kernels for the LEAKED kitkat touchwiz rom - I figured I would post some "helpfull hints" here.
I know people INSIST that kernels are either AOSP or TW - this is 100% UNTRUE - kernels are specific to the version of android - the sooner people accept this, the sooner we can get MORE KERNELS for the leak.
HINT: CM is NOT AOSP - CM IS CM
Source used was Samsung KitKat Source for the i9505g
Below is the STOCK defconfig file as pulled from the leaked kernel from samsung
WiFi Fix involves edits to the ROM, to the RAMDISK and to the source from the i9505g
<removed attachement as requested by CM members>
Thanks for all your help. We need someone with your knowledge to stick around. You are appreciated.
Sent from my SGH-M919 using Tapatalk
[email protected] said:
Thanks for all your help. We need someone with your knowledge to stick around. You are appreciated.
Sent from my SGH-M919 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Totally agreed thanks again op!
Sent from my GT-I9505G using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
So I just flash the zip with t.w. Kit Kat 4.4. Thanks
Sent from my SGH-M919 using xda app-developers app
xda23 said:
So I just flash the zip with t.w. Kit Kat 4.4. Thanks
Sent from my SGH-M919 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This isn't a kernel, it's merely a defconfig used to build the kernel.
erid2thed said:
Since it appears I am the only one to build (working) kernels for the LEAKED kitkat touchwiz rom - I figured I would post some "helpfull hints" here.
I know people INSIST that kernels are either AOSP or TW - this is 100% UNTRUE - kernels are specific to the version of android - the sooner people accept this, the sooner we can get MORE KERNELS for the leak.
HINT: CM is NOT AOSP - CM IS CM
Source used was Samsung KitKat Source for the i9505g
Below is the STOCK defconfig file as pulled from the leaked kernel from samsung
WiFi Fix involves edits to the ROM, to the RAMDISK and to the source from the i9505g
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What there be any way that you could help me try to build a building rom for the note 3 t-mobile USA 4.4.2 based on Mexico N900W8 official 4.4.2
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk
ktetreault14 said:
What there be any way that you could help me try to build a building rom for the note 3 t-mobile USA 4.4.2 based on Mexico N900W8 official 4.4.2
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not to sound like an ass, but ask CM
their developers are requesting (in a not so nice way) I pull all my work, including the STOCK SAMSUNG DEFCONFIG file in the OP above.
I removed the attachment in the OP, as requested by 3 CM developers, as threats of legal action where made.
I qm sorry man. That sucks. Its a lost cause asking CM to help with TW so I guess ill be stuck waiting on tmo
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk
ktetreault14 said:
I qm sorry man. That sucks. Its a lost cause asking CM to help with TW so I guess ill be stuck waiting on tmo
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Funny thing is they claimed my kernel was kanged from them. A TW kernel ...
Sent from my GT-I9505G using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
erid2thed said:
Funny thing is they claimed my kernel was kanged from them. A TW kernel ...
Sent from my GT-I9505G using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A Touchwiz kernel kanged from a CM kernel. Thats ridiculous. The only time I ever heard of that was the devil dualboot on note 2
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk
this is the best way to kill forum... sholudn't it ment to be here for sharing? and educational pourposes..?
you fixed the problem and have shared to everybody just to let all use it and this is the money with you get paid for..
this should be an hobby, not a sort of childish competition, or ment as a work..
forcing somebody to quit this way is very bad.. plus forcing to remove even stock samsung stuff that i and lots of other people, surely also out of xda, does have already on they're phone sounds really as an uncovered personal attack and plus we are all suffering for this as we can't use and try the very best and innovative kernel i've ever had on my phone!!!
i was about to start learning and maybe build a kernel in the future but sounds like no way i'm going to be into this..!!
anyway if you are going to develop again for your personal use please fil free to pm me or to to add me to a mailing list maybe
i'll pm you (again sorry) my mail, and please if i'm bothering you just tell me, i understand
erid2thed said:
I was told Steve from cm worked for Samsung and has rights to the file and I am to pull all kernels and related files ...or else legal action will be taken. They even claimed GPL violation for me posting the leaked kernel in a stand alone installer. Yes.. I am the one who posted it so I am the one required to post source ... So I pulled it...
This makes every ROM with a leaked kernel a violation as there is no source. But they only target me and my team.
Do I got your email address... Don't remember if I do or not.
Sent from my GT-I9505G using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They can't claim GPL violation on that. Thats just ridiculous
erid2thed said:
I was told Steve from cm worked for Samsung and has rights to the file and I am to pull all kernels and related files ...or else legal action will be taken. They even claimed GPL violation for me posting the leaked kernel in a stand alone installer. Yes.. I am the one who posted it so I am the one required to post source ... So I pulled it...
This makes every ROM with a leaked kernel a violation as there is no source. But they only target me and my team.
Do I got your email address... Don't remember if I do or not.
Sent from my GT-I9505G using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, it's petty stuff like this that drove me away from CM. It's a great rom, but they've forgotten where they came from.
TOUCHWIZ 4.4.2 kernel source is out for Note 3 http://opensource.samsung.com/reception/receptionSub.do?method=search&searchValue=SM-N9005
Maybe this can help with making a kernel for the S4?
BoboBrazil said:
TOUCHWIZ 4.4.2 kernel source is out for Note 3 http://opensource.samsung.com/reception/receptionSub.do?method=search&searchValue=SM-N9005
Maybe this can help with making a kernel for the S4?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wish but it doesn't
we need those sources like a fish needs the water to live
Wuby986 said:
I wish but it doesn't
we need those sources like a fish needs the water to live
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh well, soon. I think the first S4 official 4.4.2 rom is supposed to be out by the end of this month based on that roadmap from before so we should get it soon
erid2thed said:
ext sd card does work, its just at a different path - i posted the path in the leak'ed rom's thread (dbkat or something like that).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You mean the platform.xml?
Wuby986 said:
You mean the platform.xml?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no
the card wasnt at /extSDcard but was at
mnt/media_rw/extsdcard or something like that - i dont remember the exact path, but I did post it in the past...
For those who cant "find" their external sd card
have a look here ==>
/mnt/media_rw/extSdCard
Thread cleaned
Save the inciting drama for G+ posts and OFF XDA
If you have code to share please do without adding that to it
Thank you for your cooperation
Friendly Neighborhood Senior Moderator
Can anyone tell me if and when we will be seeing custom Roms like CM12 , MIUI, or Pac Rom? I'm not asking for dates I'm just asking if someone has development in the works, is there a reason we haven't seen anything yet. Is there something in the firmware or software that is preventing development? I just got my s6 a few weeks ago and before that I had a lg g3 but I remember from previous samsung phones I've had that we had to be s-off in order to keep root. With the OFE update in the development section it has a
Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
Place where u can shut off s-off. So if anyone can answer my questions I'd really appreciate it. Sorry about the 2 different posts. I sent the first part on accident so I had to finish it with another post.
Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
S-OFF is for HTC phones.
Oh ok. What I meant then was OEM unlocking. It says it unlocks the bootloader. Does that mean anything as far as development purposes. Is that a good thing. What early will that mean for our phones. Sorry about my first post. I've had many different kinds of phones. Each had different ways to root and tweak the phones.
Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
In before the burn...
I suggest putting this in the q&a section
Sent from my SM-G920P using XDA Free mobile app
I suggest not posting this at all and just getting it removed.....
Thanks for the nice comments people. It was just a question. You don't have to be so rude. Just delete it then.
Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
Actually, i thought this was a good question. No asking for a hard date or anything, just an honest question asking if there is a technical hurdle delaying development on this device. I was also curious about this.
It's because we're on an Exynos chip this time around, not a Qualcomm.
dpwhitty11 said:
It's because we're on an Exynos chip this time around, not a Qualcomm.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That has nothing to do with it. That only means it'll be hard as hell getting an AOSP ROM (CM, Pacman, etc.).
JoeFCaputo113 said:
That has nothing to do with it. That only means it'll be hard as hell getting an AOSP ROM (CM, Pacman, etc.).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup nothing to do with the chip. It's the fact that 5.1.1 is a pain in the a$$ for devs but I have no doubt they will figure some out soon.
Thanks guys for the responses. My next question is how come all the other s6 phones from different carriers have all kinds of roms? Aren't those s6's the same as sprints?
Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
BREWGIRL03 said:
Thanks guys for the responses. My next question is how come all the other s6 phones from different carriers have all kinds of roms? Aren't those s6's the same as sprints?
Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, almost each variant is different. The sprint variant is a little trickier.
I was wondering if you can tell me the difference? Is this something that sprint did or something samsung did to the phone. Don't they all have that new chip in the instead of the qualcom or however it's spelled chip? Does the sprint phone being trickier to get custom Roms for mean that one carriers phone is better than anothers. I'm just curious. I like to know what's up with my phone so if someone asks me I can tell them and I sound like I know what im talking about.
Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
BREWGIRL03 said:
I was wondering if you can tell me the difference? Is this something that sprint did or something samsung did to the phone. Don't they all have that new chip in the instead of the qualcom or however it's spelled chip? Does the sprint phone being trickier to get custom Roms for mean that one carriers phone is better than anothers. I'm just curious. I like to know what's up with my phone so if someone asks me I can tell them and I sound like I know what im talking about.
Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It has nothing to do with one carrier being better than any other. I'm positive it's a couple of factors such as the fact that 5.1.1 is a butthead for devs. Also, the previously mentioned development knowledge of exynos but along with that Sprint is as CDMA carrier which tends to be as little trickier for porting/development.
Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk