Related
Hey all,
I would like to ask for all:
Did you think, that is ok, when we have a lot roms, moded by different users?
I believe, that is difficult to decide , which of the roms is better for your HTC Desire. So, I want to ask for all, how we can to decide, which rom is better.
Can you write the opinion, what rom you are use? Maybe moderators can to do a brief with public opinion poll in diffrent post?
Let I will be a first for this:
HTC Desire, DeVilain 1.0, Android 2.2, radio I think is not important, that is no ROM
DeVillain 1.0
vidmas said:
Hey all,
I would like to ask for all:
Did you think, that is ok, when we have a lot roms, moded by different users?
I believe, that is difficult to decide , which of the roms is better for your HTC Desire. So, I want to ask for all, how we can to decide, which rom is better.
Can you write the opinion, what rom you are use? Maybe moderators can to do a brief with public opinion poll in diffrent post?
Let I will be a first for this:
HTC Desire, DeVilain 1.0, Android 2.2, radio I think is not important, that is no ROM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with u. And i believe most of the ROMS are copying each other.
I am Excluding great teams (AdamG, Cyannogen, Modaco, Villain etc.)
Most of the ROMs (i have tried till today) are the same with different name.
I expect that some will stop creating copies of another ROMs. I believe if they help Current teams to improve their ROMs, users will be the winners.
There is an Poll about ROMs on a post. But! no comments. (about the results)
again question for admins too
vidmas said:
Hey all,
I would like to ask for all:
Did you think, that is ok, when we have a lot roms, moded by different users?
I believe, that is difficult to decide , which of the roms is better for your HTC Desire. So, I want to ask for all, how we can to decide, which rom is better.
Can you write the opinion, what rom you are use? Maybe moderators can to do a brief with public opinion poll in diffrent post?
Let I will be a first for this:
HTC Desire, DeVilain 1.0, Android 2.2, radio I think is not important, that is no ROM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
today I install to may desire next sense 5.2 froyo. Yesterday - leedroid. I can constated: the same ****, on another hand. So anybody can tem me or, ok, not for me for user - which rom is better? Here you can find up 100 rom, and anyone, who present this rom talking - this is best. I dont think , and for may opinion one of stable was and is DeVilain 1.0 rom. Who can discuss about this? Because a lot of expert without opinion here in the forum I see.
Neophyte 1.6 or NextSense 5.2 are the two best on here imo.
Both are stable, fast and have all the fixes applied to have an enjoyable Sense 2.2 Froyo experience.
Check them out
sbdags said:
Neophyte 1.6 or NextSense 5.2 are the two best on here imo.
Both are stable, fast and have all the fixes applied to have an enjoyable Sense 2.2 Froyo experience.
Check them out
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
agreed
specialy 5.2 it can adjust cpu freq automaticly without any .apk start with your device try that
best sense 2.2 ever
vidmas said:
So, I want to ask for all, how we can to decide, which rom is better.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just try. One Rom after another. If it fits your needs, stay at the ROM you use...
I use leedroid gives me better battery then neo only two I tried since I just got my desire. Best advice is to try some and which fit it needs the most
Sent from my HTC Desire using XDA App
I've been really interested in the development in the MIUI ROM for the Desire and have tried some of XavierJohn22's offerings. The progress seems excellent and I love the look of the UI, (despite it's obvious comparisons with iOS...) and the increases in performance / battery life compared to the stock ROM.
What I'm not sure of, (and I have trawled through the forums looking for the answers!) are the differences in both functionality and advancements in development, between the variants that are on offer - namely the MIUI AU version, MarkHUK's (miui-dev) and those by XJ.
To add to the confusion, what are the differences between the 3 versions XJ has compiled? (a2sd, x-part and d2w)
Are there any benefits that would favour one over the others?
What are the benefits in moving the caches onto the SD card apart from the obvious space gains on the phone?
Is there any loss of performance?
Also, I've read that performance can be greatly improved by flashing a Froyo kernel into the Gingerbread build (MIUI 1.4.1). Surely a downgrade of kernel would also downgrade the system back to Froyo?
I appreciate these may be very noobish type questions, but I really want to learn this!
If anyone can provide any answers I would be very grateful.
P.S. Before this thread gets removed again, would someone care to let me know the reasons for deletion?
techtechnique said:
I've been really interested in the development in the MIUI ROM for the Desire and have tried some of XavierJohn22's offerings. The progress seems excellent and I love the look of the UI, (despite it's obvious comparisons with iOS...) and the increases in performance / battery life compared to the stock ROM.
What I'm not sure of, (and I have trawled through the forums looking for the answers!) are the differences in both functionality and advancements in development, between the variants that are on offer - namely the MIUI AU version, MarkHUK's (miui-dev) and those by XJ.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
These are just different build from different chefs, the main difference is that they make their rom the way they want them. Beside that one rom could use a newer version of miui then the other.
To add to the confusion, what are the differences between the 3 versions XJ has compiled? (a2sd, x-part and d2w)
Are there any benefits that would favour one over the others?
What are the benefits in moving the caches onto the SD card apart from the obvious space gains on the phone?
Is there any loss of performance?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The only advantage is more space on your phone. There could be performance loss but that depends on your SDcard and some other factors. Stick with a2sd and then if you haven't got enough space (which I doubt) you could try some other versions.
Also, I've read that performance can be greatly improved by flashing a Froyo kernel into the Gingerbread build (MIUI 1.4.1). Surely a downgrade of kernel would also downgrade the system back to Froyo?
I appreciate these may be very noobish type questions, but I really want to learn this!
If anyone can provide any answers I would be very grateful.
P.S. Before this thread gets removed again, would someone care to let me know the reasons for deletion?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A froyo kernel is for froyo and a gingerbread kernel for gingerbread. You don't use one with the other.
You can get improvements with different kernels but you just need to read and test for yourself. The main improvements could be better batterie life, but because it's depends a lot on the hardware of your phone, you should test this yourself.
Chances are it's cause you posted a question in the wrong forum, hence its movement
Hey
I've starting reading about installing custom roms and kernals, mainly to make the Arc, a little bit more awesome. However, the feature I can not live without is HDMI (it's the main reason I brought the phone). What customs ROMS (if any) support HDMI out? Does CM7? This seems to be the most popular ROM?
Also, if I were to load DoomKernal on the stock 0.42 ROM would HDMI work? Would I see much improvement in general performance with DoomKernal and stock ROM?
I did search the forums for this question before but was unable to find an answer. Sorry if I have missed it!
Appreciate your answers.
Dan
Imo Arconium is the most popular ROM and has HDMI working also
Sent from my iPad 2 using Tapatalk
Usually it should/could work on every stock based ROM.
With DooMKerneL you'll see a great improvement in perfomance, imo.
As Flo95 mentioned in the post above, Acronium ROM & DooMKernel is indeed a quite good combination.
Thanks guys. Right, now to give it a bash...
Might be the start of many more posts!
No offence to any of the developers, i respect your work !
Im just asking, what are benefits of installing Omega or ARHD ?
I want to keep stock-like rom (because of full functionality of spen etc..). And ive been considering option to flash stock-like custom rom (Omega, Wanamilite, ARHD). So i wanted to ask you what are real benefits with flashing those roms ?
And can you tell me the difference between ARHD and OMEGA (i see some difference from op threads but i cant seem to find big difference )..
Thanks in advance
Laynee1 said:
No offence to any of the developers, i respect your work !
Im just asking, what are benefits of installing Omega or ARHD ?
I want to keep stock-like rom (because of full functionality of spen etc..). And ive been considering option to flash stock-like custom rom (Omega, Wanamilite, ARHD). So i wanted to ask you what are real benefits with flashing those roms ?
And can you tell me the difference between ARHD and OMEGA (i see some difference from op threads but i cant seem to find big difference )..
Thanks in advance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am personally using WanamLite V1.5 with RedPill Rev 0.6. The benefits are that i was also looking for a stock based rom to keep all the phones original feature like Spen etc. The WanamLite rom, its stock based and adds better performance to the device. Also the RedPill Kernel further boosts performance while also boosting battery life. My $0.02 cents.
Are u experiencing keyboard lag on custom roms ? Its killing me on stock rom ...
No one else on this topic?
Handwritten from my Note 2
Laynee1 said:
No one else on this topic?
Handwritten from my Note 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To be honest with you, your best bet to get any information is to do what everybody else does. Pull up the post on each ROM where it tells you the features each ROM has then you can compare all 3 rom features and make an informed decision on which 1 you want to install. No 1 is going to do that for you.
Sent from my Galaxy Note 2 - N7100
therockk said:
To be honest with you, your best bet to get any information is to do what everybody else does. Pull up the post on each ROM where it tells you the features each ROM has then you can compare all 3 rom features and make an informed decision on which 1 you want to install. No 1 is going to do that for you.
Sent from my Galaxy Note 2 - N7100
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And i will add...read the threads of each rom.That way you can get a feeling for each rom.Level of support,problems and how friendly it is.
Then as therockk says...make your choice.
I remember back when single core phones running 1000Mhz were considered fast. People were really happy. That was about 2 years ago.
Now, we have quad-core phones running 1.6GHz each core, and people still want better performance?!!?
I haven't seem much of a difference between stock and custom ROMs for the latest few phones (GNote2, S3). Look at the good things about these phones instead of the minor little performance "issues."
xFrozen said:
I remember back when single core phones running 1000Mhz were considered fast. People were really happy. That was about 2 years ago.
Now, we have quad-core phones running 1.6GHz each core, and people still want better performance?!!?
I haven't seem much of a difference between stock and custom ROMs for the latest few phones (GNote2, S3). Look at the good things about these phones instead of the minor little performance "issues."
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stock rom and stock kernel are pretty good,especially the kernel. But i have a rooted device....i want to test the extremes...custom roms and and custom kernels give that opportunity.
Just my take but Androids not about just accepting...it`s about reaching out.
Thank you for all your replies... I decided to stay stock .. Because it fits me best. I have everything i need and performance is good.. Battery life is great..
I rooted my phone and did custom cwm just to mod it a bit... Thats all..
Thanks again folx
I know this is too much to ask... But out of my large hope on our developers & friends, I'm asking this...
Is there any possibilities to port v3.10 kernel to our device?
Wat r the advantages of using v3.10 over 3.4 ? (Definitely there are lots of changes as i searched regarding this, but couldn't understand most of them) :silly:
ashok weird said:
I know this is too much to ask... But out of my large hope on our developers & friends, I'm asking this...
Is there any possibilities to port v3.10 kernel to our device?
Wat r the advantages of using v3.10 over 3.4 ? (Definitely there are lots of changes as i searched regarding this, but couldn't understand most of them) :silly:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ya just by reading this : kernelnewbies,org/Linux_3.10 got me a headache XD
whoami-justanoob said:
ya just by reading this : kernelnewbies,org/Linux_3.10 got me a headache XD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
:laugh::laugh:
Better support for android m
New camera api v2
Better performance
Better battery backup
Less heating
And more
Some developers(the great ones over xda) say that it does not make a BIG difference...it takes a good amount of time to update them..if you compare the time spent on updating them with the new features,there is no profit..also, v3.4.0 is stable ...so its better to stay with this one..