Related
Download link: http://get.cm/get/jenkins/4629/cm-9.0.0-RC2-galaxysmtd.zip
135.99 MB
2012-07-19 08:03:24
Please close the thread since here already have original thread d...thanks
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1592131
I made this thread because that one specifically states NIGHTLY in the title, and this isn't a nightly like the rest of the ROMs in that thread.
Create a thread only for a link... facepalm
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
vinay427 said:
I made this thread because that one specifically states NIGHTLY in the title, and this isn't a nightly like the rest of the ROMs in that thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You should know here is dev ,dun simply put the links only...what is the changelog?can you give a support on it?
If pawitp feels in need of such a thread, he will create it. If not, he won't. Not every worm is allowed to create a dev thread to a ROM he didn't build.
dark_knight35 said:
If pawitp feels in need of such a thread, he will create it. If not, he won't. Not every worm is allowed to create a dev thread to a ROM he didn't build.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wasn't trying to offend anybody here, including any of the CM/SGS devs. If I did, I apologise. I just noticed the link posted on get.cm and decided to create a thread to share the news that it was released, seeing as the other thread (judging from its title) seemingly did not apply to this update. I didn't claim anywhere that I had anything to do with the making of this file, as I obviously didn't, and I don't think your calling me a "worm" is in any way necessary or helpful.
EDIT: Also, someone can close this thread, seeing as it didn't fullfill the purpose I made it for.
vinay427 said:
I wasn't trying to offend anybody here, including any of the CM/SGS devs. If I did, I apologise. I just noticed the link posted on get.cm and decided to create a thread to share the news that it was released, seeing as the other thread (judging from its title) seemingly did not apply to this update. I didn't claim anywhere that I had anything to do with the making of this file, as I obviously didn't, and I don't think your calling me a "worm" is in any way necessary or helpful.
EDIT: Also, someone can close this thread, seeing as it didn't fullfill the purpose I made it for.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You *might* post such a topic in the discussion thread. If you don't have something useful in developers' viewpoint, don't post it here, for your safety )
dark_knight35 said:
If pawitp feels in need of such a thread, he will create it. If not, he won't. Not every worm is allowed to create a dev thread to a ROM he didn't build.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
pawitp will not make the thread i guess. There is a particular 'cyanogenMOD' named account from which all RC build threads are made for all devices.
This is really unnecessary. Any fool knows that in the CM9 toppic also indicated when a release comes out. Close this mess!!!!
Verstuurd van mijn GT-I9000
Thanks. For some reason I was unable to find RC2, even though it was being mentioned in the dev thread. One quick Google brought me here.
Might've been better off posting in General.... this is not dev related.
edit: didn't refresh get.cm, had some old stuff cached It appeared
jelle2503 said:
Thanks. For some reason I was unable to find RC2, even though it was being mentioned in the dev thread. One quick Google brought me here.
Might've been better off posting in General.... this is not dev related.
edit: didn't refresh get.cm, had some old stuff cached It appeared
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wonder why nobody posted in dev section as RC1 came out....
dark_knight35 said:
I wonder why nobody posted in dev section as RC1 came out....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe because RC1 has never came out?
Thread closed as original thread exists
Hello friends
i am uploading the boot.img of stock kernel 2.6.35 i want the other files which are required to make a flashable .zip kernel
please provide requried files and make a zip and post to me
please i request u all
You don't order devs to make something for you.
Also please stop spammimg the development thread, your topics are not development related rather q/a threads
This post is in compliance with the national potato safety regulation.
[Galaxy S 4 LTE]
abhishekr700 said:
Hello friends
i am uploading the boot.img of stock kernel 2.6.35 i want the other files which are required to make a flashable .zip kernel
please provide requried files and make a zip and post to me
please i request u all
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
:highfive:
ronnieryan said:
You are a JOKE:highfive:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And you're an RC who should be trying to help people, not make fun of them.
Edit: OP, link to source code is needed if you upload a kernel
Jonny said:
And you're an RC who should be trying to help people, not make fun of them.
Edit: OP, link to source code is needed if you upload a kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sorry for that, im just not in a good mood today, things happened, anyhow what he uploaded is stock kernel pulled from stock rom and he is ordering people around to test the flashable zip that he made if it works
deathnotice01 said:
You don't order devs to make something for you.
Also please stop spammimg the development thread, your topics are not development related rather q/a threads
This post is in compliance with the national potato safety regulation.
[Galaxy S 4 LTE]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
come on i am not ordering
i think u did not read the please word read the post again
abhishekr700 said:
come on i am not ordering
i think u did not read the please word read the post again
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is again so rude...
abhishekr700 said:
come on i am not ordering
i think u did not read the please word read the post again
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think you need to post the source code... #justsayin
Jonny said:
I think you need to post the source code... #justsayin
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He dint done anything i think
He had backed up a stock kernel and posted
Sent from my GT-S5360
fifa2151 said:
He dint done anything i think
He had backed up a stock kernel and posted
Sent from my GT-S5360
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
definitely and Jonny asking for a source code is awkward, since the source is from samsung website and sammys source cannot even boot when not modded
ronnieryan said:
sorry for that, im just not in a good mood today, things happened, anyhow what he uploaded is stock kernel pulled from stock rom and he is ordering people around to test the flashable zip that he made if it works
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
but i am not forcing you to test that okk
agosain7 said:
This is again so rude...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no it isnt
fifa2151 said:
He dint done anything i think
He had backed up a stock kernel and posted
Sent from my GT-S5360
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes i wrote it in description that this is just stock kernel which was backuped mby a method i got from a website
and i am asking someone to test it
I am exhausted closing the thread
Hello everyone
because of all the negative replies i have got in here i am closing the thread
abhishekr700 said:
yes i wrote it in description that this is just stock kernel which was backuped mby a method i got from a website
and i am asking someone to test it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
abhishekr700 said:
Hello everyone
because of all the negative replies i have got in here i am closing the thread
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
let me explain to you why u got so many negative feedback,
1. you posted on development section a backup of a stock kernel (what were u developing?)
2. you want devs to test a stock kernel? (what for?) you have stock kernel when u bought the phone?
3. if you want anyone to test a kernel, you should also upload the source(if it was a custom kernel)
4. You spammed development section by posting a thread which only contains boot.img and the other with your so called flashable zip
5. you act so RUDE, as if you are ordering people around here(what you are trying to do is very3 ancient news, use search button?)
6. you should have searched before doing all the actions above..there were kernel flashers by mai77 method or by faqbly method, and you can get stock boot.img by going to dokys stock ROMs to be flashed via odin,
7. DONT SPAM every reply, there is a button called multi quote
(DONT FEEL BAD, XDA IS A VERY WELCOMING PLACE)
[JUST KNOW YOUR PLACE AND DONT ACT SO RUDE]
ronnieryan said:
let me explain to you why u got so many negative feedback,
1. you posted on development section a backup of a stock kernel (what were u developing?)
2. you want devs to test a stock kernel? (what for?) you have stock kernel when u bought the phone?
3. if you want anyone to test a kernel, you should also upload the source(if it was a custom kernel)
4. You spammed development section by posting a thread which only contains boot.img and the other with your so called flashable zip
5. you act so RUDE, as if you are ordering people around here(what you are trying to do is very3 ancient news, use search button?)
6. you should have searched before doing all the actions above..there were kernel flashers by mai77 method or by faqbly method, and you can get stock boot.img by going to dokys stock ROMs to be flashed via odin,
7. DONT SPAM every reply, there is a button called multi quote
(DONT FEEL BAD, XDA IS A VERY WELCOMING PLACE)
[JUST KNOW YOUR PLACE AND DONT ACT SO RUDE]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hey ronnie iam sorry
thanx for telling me about my mistakes
i will remember these in future
Even if you post a stock kernel binary, still needs source or a link to the source (ie, opensource.samsung)...
As for it not booting, that's Samsung's problem
Jonny said:
Even if you post a stock kernel binary, still needs source or a link to the source (ie, opensource.samsung)...
As for it not booting, that's Samsung's problem
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Man you are high these days!! Leave the kernel devs here
Go loiter somewhere else
Many people who are insterested in making new projects but dont know where to disscuss can gather here
EVERYONE IS ALLOWED THIS IS JUST NOT FOR ME BUT FOR ALL
This thread is for ROMS,Kernels,tools,apps,mods,scriptsetc and etc and also for people who have interest in starting a project and getting doubts cleared
RULES:
RULES FOR FOOLS.GATHER,DISSCUSS,START A PROJECT,HELP,GET HELP,DO GOOD
PRESS THANKS IF HELPED
No need of this thead!
gurram prashanth said:
Just wanted to quote!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
General thread is for all the Discussion matters. No need to open new placeholder thread!
Our device has got seperate thread called:
Galaxy Y GT-S5360 General
Discussion about the Samsung Galaxy Y GT-S5360 (general chat, tips & tricks, etc)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In this thread, all the projects discussion will be messed up!
every project/new custom rom have its own discussion thread, i think this should be have title as "GENERAL DISSCUSION"
gothed said:
every project/new custom rom have its own discussion thread, i think this should be have title as "GENERAL DISSCUSION"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This thread should not have been created!
We already have a whole branch i.e. General branch. This thrread only messes up discussions and is useless!
Is there a thread or guide for liquid smooth 4.0 rom?
Benholder90 said:
Is there a thread or guide for liquid smooth 4.0 rom?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can't be serious that you started a new thread in the development section to ask this question???
Ask the builders in their threads. This will probably get moved or deleted.
page 2 dude, search button all over the forum.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/lg-g3/development/rom-liquidsmooth-v4-0-t2955089
purian23 said:
You can't be serious that you started a new thread in the development section to ask this question???
Ask the builders in their threads. This will probably get moved or deleted.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes i dont actually know why i did that dont really know where to ask i suppose. Sorry for being stupid
rhystagram said:
page 2 dude, search button all over the forum.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/lg-g3/development/rom-liquidsmooth-v4-0-t2955089
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you!
twrp-3.2.2-0 on Android 8.1.0 Oreo or Android Development Preview DP4. Is it better than twrp 3.2.1-2?
Wrong section
This thread is unnecessary. We really don't need a new thread for TWRP discussions, as there really isn't much to discuss. Dee_Troy's thread works fine if something needs to be brought up
Akomack said:
This thread is unnecessary. We really don't need a new thread for TWRP discussions, as there really isn't much to discuss. Dee_Troy's thread works fine if something needs to be brought up
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@Dees_Troy
The last "Dees_Troy" thread, I saw, was for twrp-3.2.1-2. After, reading several threads with comments about twrp-3.2.2-0.
I thought it would be nice to have a thread for it so all the members could go to one thread for twrp-3.2.2-0 information. I respect your right to disagree. Further, if Dees_Troy opens a thread for it or updates his thread to twrp-3.2.2-0. I will ask the moderators to close this thread.
*Delete
Akomack said:
Similar to your question on the Magisk thread not being updated, the TWRP thread doesn't need a new title every time an update is pushed. @Dees_Troy is the lead dev of TWRP, so regardless whether or not the title or OP of the thread had been updated, I would still consider that one to be the 'official' thread for TWRP.
I highly doubt he's going to spend the time going through the dozens of device specific threads just to update the title/OP.
I don't want to start a pissing match, but to have multiple threads about the same thing is bonkers and only serves to muddy up the thread list.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@Dees_Troy
No, not similar to my "question on the Magisk thread" I asked if the thread was "relevant". Why? No one was using it. I know who Dees_Troy is, I think he can speak for himself. He doesn't need a mouth piece. So, since you don't want to start a "pissing match." Keep your 'tude' to yourself and stop posting.
Further, Dees_Troy took the time to update his thread to twrp-3.2.1-2.
Does it work with encryption on dp4? 3.2.1-2 didn't work for me with encryption on dp3
bkkzak said:
Does it work with encryption on dp4? 3.2.1-2 didn't work for me with encryption on dp3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, you have to remove pin, or password and it works.
Wrong section...
liam_davenport said:
Wrong section
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wrong section
Homeboy76 said:
Wrong section
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is no development being done here. You are not contributing anything. That's why we have a discussion section, where this should go.
stebomurkn420 said:
There is no development being done here. You are not contributing anything. That's why we have a discussion section, where this should go.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah you're right. Moderator please move this to the "Pixel XL Questions and Answers forum."
Homeboy76 said:
Yeah you're right. How do I get it there
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sure a mod will take care of it for you just read a little further into the rules before posting in the future, this will save everyone time and clutter. I appreciate your enthusiasm towards our device and I hope this doesn't discourage you from participating!
stebomurkn420 said:
I'm sure a mod will take care of it for you just read a little further into the rules before posting in the future, this will save everyone time and clutter. I appreciate your enthusiasm towards our device and I hope this doesn't discourage you from participating!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I edited my post and ask the moderator to move the thread to the "discussion section." Thanks for your assistance. I'm blind in one eye and can't see out of the other. I'll read the rules again, I promise. Not discouraged, just disappointed I missed this in the rules. Thanks for getting me pointed in the right direction.
Homeboy76 said:
Yeah, I edited my post and ask the moderator to move the thread to the "discussion section." Thanks for your assistance. I'm blind in one eye and can't see out of the other. I'll read the rules again, I promise. Not discouraged, just disappointed I missed this in the rules. Thanks for getting me pointed in the right direction.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awesome! Sounds great! As far as twrp 3.2.2-0 goes, I haven't flashed it yet, I've heard nothing but positive feedback so far though.
Just so much win.
Phalanx7621 said:
Just so much win.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Thread closed by request.