AOKP+Nameless+Asylum_Omni - Oppo Find 7 and 7a

I have tested these roms on my find 7a and they work great. I'm not sure of these will work with find 7 so please do a nand backup and report back in the thread if it works. Credits to the devs for these releases.
Asylum_Omni
AOKP Official Nightlies
NamelessROM Nightlies

Asylum-omni!
That reminds me of my Note 1 days. Deff getting this now.... Is there an asylum thread about?

shure2 said:
Asylum-omni!
That reminds me of my Note 1 days. Deff getting this now.... Is there an asylum thread about?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I found the roms by browsing goo.im but I don't think there are any threads for either rom besides this one for now

uppon2 said:
I found the roms by browsing goo.im but I don't think there are any threads for either rom besides this one for now
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for sharing. I know Chas has set up a thread or two on XDA before so I'll patiently wait for him to start one up.

Anyone tried this?http://androxfer.in/get.php?p=AOKP-....zip&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=pulsenews
Apparently it works on 7a

I will give it a shot now
Edit* This appears to be the same as the one I linked in the OP but a newer build from Dirk. I am assuming this has now gone in to an official status as I can find it on the AOKP site. OP has been updated with the official site being the link - Thank you for pointing it out as it has now made me realise it was official! - I remember seeing a post from Dirk on Google+ about it being supported but I had forgotten to keep an eye out on the actual AOKP site.
Also added official CM nightlies to OP

Do any of this work with the Find7 (not 7a)?

jampola said:
Do any of this work with the Find7 (not 7a)?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not sure. You could make a nand backup then try if you want. I think as soon as there is an AOSP rom built for the find 7 QHD you could use the kernel from that and put it in roms built for find 7a and everything should be fine. Until then it might not function at 100 percent.

Thanks for posting the links dude!
So the AOKP nightly for the FInd 7, that's for the "Find 7" not the 7a? And is it for the 9077? AOKP doesn't specify the device model
Cheers

TheSmokingAndroid said:
Thanks for posting the links dude!
So the AOKP nightly for the FInd 7, that's for the "Find 7" not the 7a? And is it for the 9077? AOKP doesn't specify the device model
Cheers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well Dirk Rettschlag has mentioned it here as the Find 7 but I have used the version displayed in the screenshot from his G+ plus the release on the official AOKP site which also lists it as Find 7 on my Find 7a and it works perfectly. Do a nand backup and have a shot at testing it?

DOES IT WORK?

Find 7 (x9076) compatibility?
Is it compatible with the QHD Find 7?

Anyone having SU issues on the latest Nameless nightly?

JRW 28 said:
Anyone having SU issues on the latest Nameless nightly?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What issues are you facing?

uppon2 said:
What issues are you facing?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
SuperSU kept force closing and was non responsive at all both times I installed the ROM on clean installs. Could get no root features or root apps to work?
I've seen this before as SuperSU needed the binaries updated but I could get no progress with it??

JRW 28 said:
SuperSU kept force closing and was non responsive at all both times I installed the ROM on clean installs. Could get no root features or root apps to work?
I've seen this before as SuperSU needed the binaries updated but I could get no progress with it??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try downloading superuser by clockwork and busybox by Stephen and use those and see how that plays out

uppon2 said:
Try downloading superuser by chainfire and busybox by Stephen and use those and see how that plays out
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Didn't even think about that. Thanks. Running C-Rom right now as I liked it on my S4. Just getting used to this phone. A big upgrade from the S4!

JRW 28 said:
Didn't even think about that. Thanks. Running C-Rom right now as I liked it on my S4. Just getting used to this phone. A big upgrade from the S4!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I liked C-Rom but it gave me issues installing it. Every time I tried to run it it would not pass the boot animation; after 10 minutes of it sitting there the same thing would happen on reboot. The only way I got it to work was by dirty flashing over the top of itself. After installing all of my apps i went to reboot and upon pressing and holding the power button it forced a hot reboot that would not pass the boot animation. I gave up after trying this a few times. I didn't report this to the dev as he has lots of stuff going on.

uppon2 said:
I liked C-Rom but it gave me issues installing it. Every time I tried to run it it would not pass the boot animation; after 10 minutes of it sitting there the same thing would happen on reboot. The only way I got it to work was by dirty flashing over the top of itself. After installing all of my apps i went to reboot and upon pressing and holding the power button it forced a hot reboot that would not pass the boot animation. I gave up after trying this a few times. I didn't report this to the dev as he has lots of stuff going on.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Had similar issues first time I tried booting C-Rom. When I seen Nameless on the Oppo forums their instructions added wipe system after full wipe an it seems to be working good like that. I now factory reset, then wipe system, dalvik and cache under advanced and it seems to be working fine like that

JRW 28 said:
Had similar issues first time I tried booting C-Rom. When I seen Nameless on the Oppo forums their instructions added wipe system after full wipe an it seems to be working good like that. I now factory reset, then wipe system, dalvik and cache under advanced and it seems to be working fine like that
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have always formatted system. Most roms will have it in the script but I have always done it manually

Related

(KK)(ROM)(LINK) Cyanogenmod 11 by Maclaw 2014

Believe it or not everyone, MaclawStudio is back on development for the ArmV6 Galaxy Gio and Galaxy Ace. To Top it all off, He has a booting release of KitKat (as CM11) built for the Gio and Ace. The First Release was on 16 January 2014 causing a bit of a stir and excitement (including myself ) in the Gio/Ace Community.
The link to the original Thread on the MaclawStudio Site:
http://maclaw.pl/2014/01/16/release-cyanogenmod-11-0-acegio/
The Link to the Download Page for MaclawStudio CM11 Gio Build (On Maclaw's request, Please do not mirror)
http://maclaw.pl/downloads/
This ROM was built by the MaclawStudio Team, I am Only Sharing it!
Enjoy my Fellow Gio Users!!:good::fingers-crossed:
Bluetooth does not work
Did not work for me
-----
But the rest is good
monaliza142003 said:
Bluetooth does not work
Did not work for me
-----
But the rest is good
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unfortunately I'm not the developer of this ROM so I can't take the logcat. MaclawStudio team could handle that, (I'm just sharing the ROM) , but I'm sure within the coming weeks it will be almost bugless Bluetooth seems to be a general bug for now, I'm also having issues with it.
monaliza142003 said:
Bluetooth does not work
Did not work for me
-----
But the rest is good
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Email it to them, don't they have a support page? Well I'm sure they'll respect it even if not:good:
Ya, They are a good team but they do want these, they need it to make there development easier and better
Aiko0923 said:
Email it to them, don't they have a support page? Well I'm sure they'll respect it even if not:good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks
I know my friend
However,i said it in facebook
it sais on their page that i can install it with any recovery, but i cant, i have 6.0.3.2
CCXAlex said:
it sais on their page that i can install it with any recovery, but i cant, i have 6.0.3.2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
try CWM 5 from MMB
For those of you who have trouble installing this, this is how i did it (not saying it will work for you but it worked for me).
First of all i might say that i used CWM 5.0.2.6.
1) I booted in to CWM
2) Format system (option is found in mount and storage i believe)
3) Full wipe/factory reset
4) Clean cache and dalvik
5) Install the rom
6) Clean cache and dalvik
Reboot phone and wait for it to start, when i got my phone started a noticed a lack of Gapps so i once again rebooted
in to recaovery and installed this Gapps
Im not taking any responsibility for what happens to your phone if you follow these steps only i can say is that they worked for me
I have installed it over Modded Cm10.1, with all necessary wipe's.
btw. Why KikKat if we cant get it main feature - ART. ?
ShadyTurtle334 said:
I have installed it over Modded Cm10.1, with all necessary wipe's.
btw. Why KikKat if we cant get it main feature - ART. ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I see What You Mean, but there are alot of other reasons, such as the lowered system requirements, sweet newer type of UI, THE LATEST ANDROID VERSION (to name a few)
Anybody having Problems with recovery and install use @phiexz CWM 5 (ext4 only) :good:
when a new update ?
too laggy i dont recommend it at all
cRaZyzMaN said:
too laggy i dont recommend it at all
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you have a working sim on the phone?
cRaZyzMaN said:
too laggy i dont recommend it at all
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try this :good:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2360670

OmniROM

** If you are interested in taking over the project, pm me **
Offical Site
XDA Forums
Google+
Twitter
Facebook
IRC(User)
JIRA
Disclaimer
Flash at your OWN Risk
How to Install
Install TWRP
Factory Reset
Format System
Install ROM
Install Google Apps
Install SuperSU
How to Update
Goto SuperSU -> Settings -> Install SuperSU backup script
Goto Settings -> About phone -> System Updates -> Check now
This will download and install latest OTA
DOWNLOAD
TWRP
ROM
Google Apps
SuperSU
Known Issues
Developer Stuff
COMPILE YOURSELF
Github
Gerrit
IRC(Dev)
Changelog​
XDA:DevDB Information
OmniROM, ROM for the Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II
Contributors
UtkarshGupta, XpLoDWilD, Entropy512, OmniROM Team
ROM OS Version: 4.4.x KitKat
ROM Kernel: Linux 3.0.x
ROM Firmware Required: SPH-L900
Based On: AOSP
Version Information
Status: Stable
Current Stable Version: Nightlies
Created 2014-04-10
Last Updated 2014-12-08
Nice
My name is Skripka and I approve of this. :good:
Excited to try this out. Read up on OmniRom, I am particularly interested in the multi-workspace piece.
I just started working with JIRA at my workplace, I was just thinking today that it would be great for Rom developers.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk
this rom is really awesome; esp with plasma. nice to see it in development thread finally:good:
cmart4 said:
this rom is really awesome; esp with plasma. nice to see it in development thread finally:good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Definitely might have to try this rom. It's either this or Paranoid.. not sure what the difference are Really want to get Plasma going though!
slick_rick said:
...
Known bugs:
- Check sbrissen's CM11 thread...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Out of curiosity, I thought that Cyanogen and Omni were separate since CM went commercial..? I thought that some of the CM devs (like Chainfire, XplodedWild, and Dees_Troy) were upset with that and decided to start their own ROM (hence OmniRom)...
Regardless, I'm very excited to see OmniRom has its own page now in our Android Development. It will make it much easier to see how each nightly performs and if there are any bugs that need to be reported.
Additionally, there's a lot of info/support/feature requests/etc here.
Thanks slick_rick!!
altimuh said:
Out of curiosity, I thought that Cyanogen and Omni were separate since CM went commercial..? I thought that some of the CM devs (like Chainfire, XplodedWild, and Dees_Troy) were upset with that and decided to start their own ROM (hence OmniRom)...
Regardless, I'm very excited to see OmniRom has its own page now in our Android Development. It will make it much easier to see how each nightly performs and if there are any bugs that need to be reported.
Additionally, there's a lot of info/support/feature requests/etc here.
Thanks slick_rick!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They are separate for the most part but I am using sbrissens cm11 device tree as a base for omni l900 tree so any bugs there will be here.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
slick_rick said:
They are separate for the most part but I am using sbrissens cm11 device tree as a base for omni l900 tree so any bugs there will be here.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On Omni's page they talk about mulitwindow being up to the individual dev who brings it to each device. Is it possible to get that added in the future, or is that going to be up to Omni?
Thanks for the info and thanks for your hard work!!
Thanks for all your hard work and not given up on us like people's. Just downloaded and look forward to trying it out. On a side note I've been spending all my free time in the XDA University forums trying to teach myself how to compile and build. I've got Ubuntu and all the tools but having a 14 month old son n being a single dad in the evenings haven't given me much free time to practice and read.
So i can appreciate all the time and effort you put in to doing this all.
Thank you slick-rick for this great ROM. For me, everything is running flawlessly so far but I have a question. I used Phil's Touch to install the ROM originally and as I mentioned it's running great. This morning I checked for an update and there is a new nightly available. When I went through the process to install the nightly it said that it was only compatible with TWRP. Is this correct, or is it OK to continue with the installation even though I have Phil's Touch? Thank you again for all your work.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
davesbest said:
Thank you slick-rick for this great ROM. For me, everything is running flawlessly so far but I have a question. I used Phil's Touch to install the ROM originally and as I mentioned it's running great. This morning I checked for an update and there is a new nightly available. When I went through the process to install the nightly it said that it was only compatible with TWRP. Is this correct, or is it OK to continue with the installation even though I have Phil's Touch? Thank you again for all your work.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which Nightly did you install? Any nightly build after 1/10 or so should be able to OpenDelta update script via PhilZ/CWM just fine.
Skripka said:
Which Nightly did you install? Any nightly build after 1/10 or so should be able to OpenDelta update script via PhilZ/CWM just fine.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I haven't installed a nightly yet. I was waiting to make sure i could do it with phils. Thank you so much for the help. Going to install it now.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Well, that didn't go so good. When I go to system update and do "flash now," it boots to philz recovery but I keep getting "installation aborted" messages. Any ideas?
Thanks. Dave.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
SuperSU won't allow me to update binary and tried to use root explorer stated that I didn't have root. ?
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using Tapatalk
Is anyone else getting high Google Services usage? It's the highest usage listed in the battery settings
EGOvoruhk said:
Is anyone else getting high Google Services usage? It's the highest usage listed in the battery settings
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Check your wakelocks...I saw it and made it go away by changing location to "Device only".
'no service' issue
I had this rom running for a couple of days, then had an issue with an app (xbmc), and decided to go back to macksrom....didn't realize that once you install 4.4.2, you can't go back to 4.1.2...anyway after trying to restore to macksrom failed twice on the data restore, I went ahead and reloaded omnirom, and worked through the xbmc issue....didn't realize until my wife found me at the grocery store that after bringing it back via restore I had no service...and I couldn't find anyway to get service either....
Is this a known issue, or do you know if I did something wrong?
---------- Post added at 07:41 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:20 PM ----------
hinesw said:
I had this rom running for a couple of days, then had an issue with an app (xbmc), and decided to go back to macksrom....didn't realize that once you install 4.4.2, you can't go back to 4.1.2...anyway after trying to restore to macksrom failed twice on the data restore, I went ahead and reloaded omnirom, and worked through the xbmc issue....didn't realize until my wife found me at the grocery store that after bringing it back via restore I had no service...and I couldn't find anyway to get service either....
Is this a known issue, or do you know if I did something wrong?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just did a complete re-install of the omnirom zip file....seems to be back to normal. Of course, now I have to get all my apps back on and placed the way I like 'em....oh well.
Skripka said:
Check your wakelocks...I saw it and made it go away by changing location to "Device only".
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tried this for two days - one mostly on WiFi and one out and about. First day on WiFi I got waaaaaaay better battery, but the second day I got not so good results with Google maps - it took a while to "find my location"....also with location set to 'Device Only', I got high battery use from the weather channel app I have installed, and Dashclock widget can't find my geo location and report.... I think I'll take the slightly higher battery drain with a fully functioning GPS setting.
Thanks for the tip though - it could be super handy for someone mostly on WiFi.
altimuh said:
Tried this for two days - one mostly on WiFi and one out and about. First day on WiFi I got waaaaaaay better battery, but the second day I got not so good results with Google maps - it took a while to "find my location"....also with location set to 'Device Only', I got high battery use from the weather channel app I have installed, and Dashclock widget can't find my geo location and report.... I think I'll take the slightly higher battery drain with a fully functioning GPS setting.
Thanks for the tip though - it could be super handy for someone mostly on WiFi.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you're not traveling, just set DashClock's location manually. Can't vouch for Weather Channel's app, but Weatherbug Elite plays fine with it and doesn't care.
The location pinging with Google Now is insane...and there's no way I know to stop the thousands of location wakelocks short of changing the location preference. Not even changing the app permissions for the location services does any good. And that isn't just an OmniROM issue, but for ever 4.4 ROM I know of.

[4.4] CyanogenMod 11 nightlies

They are released officially und http://download.cyanogenmod.com/?device=n1 :victory:
With the lastest "cm-11-20140126-NIGHTLY-n1.zip" I get no location data - wich makes the N1 unusable for Maps, Foursquare, Ingress aso..
Switches back to "cm-11-20140124-NIGHTLY-n1.zip" everything works fine again.
Flash with stock recovery?
Is there a way to flash a nightly build with the sotck recovery? If not how to change the recovery? Thx
dryll said:
Is there a way to flash a nightly build with the sotck recovery? If not how to change the recovery? Thx
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You will not be able to flash this with the stock recovery. I imagine once it goes stable CM will push out an official update that will work on the stock recovery setup.
Until then, TWRP works great: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2537080
dryll said:
Is there a way to flash a nightly build with the sotck recovery? If not how to change the recovery? Thx
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I bet I could make that happen. Probably just a reverse of what I do to make it flash in TWRP instead of stock. I bet I could add the first line back in and have it flash properly.
Harfainx said:
I bet I could make that happen. Probably just a reverse of what I do to make it flash in TWRP instead of stock. I bet I could add the first line back in and have it flash properly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Flashify works great for installing TWRP, just backup your stock recovery first, that way you can flash it back before rebooting recovery and flashing colour OS. 27th Nightly is available.
mcteague said:
Flashify works great for installing TWRP, just backup your stock recovery first, that way you can flash it back before rebooting recovery and flashing colour OS. 27th Nightly is available.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I meant flash nightlies in stock recovery. I have TWRP on mine, but I bounce back and forth for testing.
Sent from my N1 using Tapatalk
Harfainx said:
I meant flash nightlies in stock recovery. I have TWRP on mine, but I bounce back and forth for testing.
Sent from my N1 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm 90% certain stock recovery will not flash nightlies, as it will only flash ZIPs signed with specific signing keys.
Unless CM is signing their nightly ZIPs with the same key as their "official" releases, which is highly unlikely.
Entropy512 said:
I'm 90% certain stock recovery will not flash nightlies, as it will only flash ZIPs signed with specific signing keys.
Unless CM is signing their nightly ZIPs with the same key as their "official" releases, which is highly unlikely.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Correct. Currently since they're coming direct from CM as nightlies, they aren't final stable versions. Those will be released like the other two were, and I'm sure will be built to flash in the N1 Stock Recovery.
Location not working
location still not working on latest nightly (130214).
anyone has any idea on how to fix it? the 240114 nightly is not longer on the getCM servers.
Anyone on M6? Thoughts?
I went straight from CM10.2 (CM edition N1) to 11 M6, so I don't know how battery life compares with Omni or other ROMs... would love to hear from those of you that have tried other ROMs and can compare with M6.
With M6, I am getting ~4% battery drain over 7 hours overnight (2G network on only).
All People Update CM. there is the cm-11-20140724-NIGHTLY
First update to the latest nightly in CM page, after that you can update via OTA in your phone, there is Daily updates!!
O-Click, Works, meaby a second lag (while focusing?)
O-Touch Works, not as the touchpad of your lap but works, And for some reason changing the VM to ART works better for me.
3G works
Battery last very good, and its suposed to las more in stand-by if you use ART instead of Dalvik
ART works well by the way.
ThommmF said:
They are released officially und http://download.cyanogenmod.com/?device=n1 :victory:
With the lastest "cm-11-20140126-NIGHTLY-n1.zip" I get no location data - wich makes the N1 unusable for Maps, Foursquare, Ingress aso..
Switches back to "cm-11-20140124-NIGHTLY-n1.zip" everything works fine again.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi,
I am trying to install Cyanogend mod. N1 a OPPO
The steps are simple, but not working,
I've tried: (http://download.cyanogenmod.com/?device=n1&type=snapshot)
** Cm-11-20140804-SNAPSHOT-M9-n1
cm-11-20140805-NIGHTLY-N1
cm-11-20140124-EXPERIMENTAL-n1.zip
They all show the same error.
"Installation failed"
I downloaded the. zip for wifi, ethernet MAC, WINDOWS ........ and still shows the same error.
:crying:
ThommmF said:
They are released officially und http://download.cyanogenmod.com/?device=n1 :victory:
With the lastest "cm-11-20140126-NIGHTLY-n1.zip" I get no location data - wich makes the N1 unusable for Maps, Foursquare, Ingress aso..
Switches back to "cm-11-20140124-NIGHTLY-n1.zip" everything works fine again.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry to bump a 3 year old thread for such an unrelated reason, but you have PMs disabled, and, well, CM11 is not that appealing anymore so I'm confident not many people are gonna read this anyway [any mods reading this, please spare my soul :silly: ]
That said, I just wanted to ask you why you rated my porting of LAOS 15 Trebuchet so poorly, since you didn't leave any comment; if it's some bug, crash or other error i can look into it.
BTW you can answer me on the app's thread if you wish (https://forum.xda-developers.com/android/apps-games/app-lineageos-15-trebuchet-laucher-rom-t3667436)
ThommmF said:
They are released officially und http://download.cyanogenmod.com/?device=n1 :victory:
With the lastest "cm-11-20140126-NIGHTLY-n1.zip" I get no location data - wich makes the N1 unusable for Maps, Foursquare, Ingress aso..
Switches back to "cm-11-20140124-NIGHTLY-n1.zip" everything works fine again.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you for leaving your feedback, here are some answers to your points:
- (update mechanism) i actually caught a nasty bug in XDA Labs web console which prevents me from uploading new builds there (and I also deleted all previous reviews in the attempt to reupload the app ??); (i already filed a bug report and managed to get the dev's attention so I hope it gets fixed soon)
- (open source) being a porting, the app mostly shares the original staging/trebuchet15.1 source code, with only a handful edits for fixing crashes due to compatibility errors (and is built with gradle plugin 2.3.3 instead of 3.0.1)
- (very buggy) it inherits all current staging/trebuchet15.1 bugs, not that much from my tests, but yes, there are some

[Q] Chrome crashes

I recently flashed PA 4.4 RC1 and the latest gapps package (06.08). As far as I know, I haven't done anything that could've touched chrome in any way. But now chrome crashes everytime I tap on a suggestion in the addresbar dropdown list. This is very annoying.
I tried reflashing gapps, didn't work. I tried uninstalling chrom with titanium backup, but chrom didn'T even uninstall properly. I tried disabling all xposed modules I have installed but that didn't help either.
Does anyona have or had a similar issue? I ran out of ideas on how to troubleshoot this. Wiping and reflashing PA would be the very last option that I would rather not do becuase it takes a rather long time. Any help would be much appreciated.
ps.: I have a nexus 5
Longi94 said:
I recently flashed PA 4.4 RC1 and the latest gapps package (06.08). As far as I know, I haven't done anything that could've touched chrome in any way. But now chrome crashes everytime I tap on a suggestion in the addresbar dropdown list. This is very annoying.
I tried reflashing gapps, didn't work. I tried uninstalling chrom with titanium backup, but chrom didn'T even uninstall properly. I tried disabling all xposed modules I have installed but that didn't help either.
Does anyona have or had a similar issue? I ran out of ideas on how to troubleshoot this. Wiping and reflashing PA would be the very last option that I would rather not do becuase it takes a rather long time. Any help would be much appreciated.
ps.: I have a nexus 5
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
both my D2lte and my Toro are having the same issues. it seems it revolves around editing the address bar not actually following links. i manually uninstalled from system using root browser(normal un install doesnt work) and tried re installing .. nada. i can confirm that you are not alone.
-dns
We have a bug tracker... If you would read it you would see that it has been reported and already fixed for next release
Sent from my Nexus 5
Where da Bug Tracker at?
Pirateghost said:
We have a bug tracker... If you would read it you would see that it has been reported and already fixed for next release
Sent from my Nexus 5
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi Pirateghost
I'm new to ParanoidAndroid, could you link that Bug Tracker please?
I've looked but can't seem to find it.
Wouldn't want to be spamming bugs that have already been recognised. :angel:
Kozmyk said:
Hi Pirateghost
I'm new to ParanoidAndroid, could you link that Bug Tracker please?
I've looked but can't seem to fond it.
Wouldn't want to be spamming bugs that have already been recognised. :angel:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You should join the G+ community and follow +Paranoid Android on G+
https://paranoidandroid.atlassian.net/secure/Dashboard.jspa
We have all this info readily available in one spot.
https://plus.google.com/b/115605611166087751372/communities/112514149478109338346

[Q&A] [ROM] [5.1.0] [AOSP Grogg's Way]

Q&A for [ROM] [5.1.0] [AOSP Grogg's Way]
Some developers prefer that questions remain separate from their main development thread to help keep things organized. Placing your question within this thread will increase its chances of being answered by a member of the community or by the developer.
Before posting, please use the forum search and read through the discussion thread for [ROM] [5.1.0] [AOSP Grogg's Way]. If you can't find an answer, post it here, being sure to give as much information as possible (firmware version, steps to reproduce, logcat if available) so that you can get help.
Thanks for understanding and for helping to keep XDA neat and tidy!
I also made the plunge after CleanRom support was discontinued. Everything works great so far, awesome rom!!
TXJim said:
I also made the plunge after CleanRom support was discontinued. Everything works great so far, awesome rom!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same here. Running smoothly so far. Just got everything installed!
Is this ROM actually 5.1 ... cause google haven't released the factory image's yet...?
obsidianuk said:
Is this ROM actually 5.1 ... cause google haven't released the factory image's yet...?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I assure you, this is 5.1.0. It is not a modified factory image. Its AOSP compiled from source.
GROGG88 said:
I assure you, this is 5.1.0. It is not a modified factory image. Its AOSP compiled from source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That miscellaneous category is in my battery stats again. Anyone else have it too? Doesn't seem to be draining battery, so I don't know what to make of it.
LucentBirch said:
That miscellaneous category is in my battery stats again. Anyone else have it too? Doesn't seem to be draining battery, so I don't know what to make of it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Previous build had an option in dev settings that was added to remove unaccounted and overcounted stats from showing up. For some reason google only chooses to apply the changes to release builds. I removed that code to get a look at it, but you're right it is still there. I have re-committed the changes and have builds uploading in a bit.
GROGG88 said:
I assure you, this is 5.1.0. It is not a modified factory image. Its AOSP compiled from source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you going to build again when the n7 2013 factory image is posted by google - or is there no point (I guess the real question is will there be specific changes for our device when the image is officially out?)
I'm trying to decided to flash now or wait... ☺
obsidianuk said:
Are you going to build again when the n7 2013 factory image is posted by google - or is there no point (I guess the real question is well there be specific changes for our device when the image is officially out?)
I'm trying to decided to flash now or wait...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, I'll be building with new binaries and with whatever other changes may be implemented at that time...
obsidianuk said:
Are you going to build again when the n7 2013 factory image is posted by google - or is there no point (I guess the real question is will there be specific changes for our device when the image is officially out?)
I'm trying to decided to flash now or wait... ☺
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My 2¢: flash now & start enjoying this incredibly smooth & fast ROM.
just a simple question: whenever u update this ROM, is it necessary/recommended to wipe the device again? or is the first wipe good enough?
and if its necessary, will the backup of all apps and system settings affect the performance after updating?
lucass001 said:
just a simple question: whenever u update this ROM, is it necessary/recommended to wipe the device again? or is the first wipe good enough?
and if its necessary, will the backup of all apps and system settings affect the performance after updating?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That really depends on the update.
@GROGG88 you say you're using elementalx kernel, right? Have you, or anyone else for that matter, had random reboots? I have at least 2 every day, if not more...
LucentBirch said:
@GROGG88 you say you're using elementalx kernel, right? Have you, or anyone else for that matter, had random reboots? I have at least 2 every day, if not more...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No random reboots on my N7
LucentBirch said:
@GROGG88 you say you're using elementalx kernel, right? Have you, or anyone else for that matter, had random reboots? I have at least 2 every day, if not more...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have in the past, but currently I'm running my included kernel. Zero reboots...
USB OTG Support?
Does this have the ability to have dual charging and reading from a usb hub? I read the features and it didn't state that it did.
[email protected] said:
Does this have the ability to have dual charging and reading from a usb hub? I read the features and it didn't state that it did.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then you have answered your own question. I do not hide features just so people are forced to question about them.
Hi thanks for the Rom works great.
One question is there a reason I lose all my none google email accounts in gmail when I upgrade to a new version?
nawo69 said:
Hi thanks for the Rom works great.
One question is there a reason I lose all my none google email accounts in gmail when I upgrade to a new version?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not sure. I don't have non google contacts. Those should be stored in your data partition. Unless you're doing a wipe they should remain...
backup
I noticed you mentioned using backup apps with a clean install negates the wiping done. Is the same true for ADB and TWRP backups too?

Categories

Resources