Related
Apple update the spec of their devices every year and I think Microsoft should look to do this also...
In addition to the Gyroscope and new processors metioned at MIX I would like to see the following...
Fall 2011 - Windows Phone 7.5
1. Front Facing Camera - Launched with Live Messenger, Skype etc...
2. 16 GB Minimum Memory - I have no space for new APPS on my 8 GB device!!
3. SD Card option like on the Samsung Focus as standard.
Fall 2012 - Windows Phone 8
1. DLNA - Stream movies, photos to TV
2. Windows Button to also be 8 directional D-PAD as standard.
3. Allow remapping of all buttons when in Game Mode.
3. NFC - contactless mobile payments
4. USB 3
5. Bluetooth 3 or 4
6. XGA Resolution 1024 x 768
7. HDMI
8. Dual Core processors - multiple suppliers
I am sure there will be Android devices that meet these specs by late 2012
Low end devices would stay as WP7 and WP8 would support the high end features... Microsoft has already said this is the strategy.
I think the most important update should be software and increase in software features to improve the versatility of the platform. Windows 7 phones as at now are by no means low in specs.
Agrred the current specs are high enough for the momment. The main problem is software develpoers trying to create sual core supported software which, means its better if ms wait a while and do what andorid have whereby they have increased spped of the os and added new features and battery saving features mainly. Also speed wise JIT would be good.
The specs are fine, but I do see them improving, obviously. I've stated in other threads I see them updating faster because of market production and not because of necessity, unlike Android.
With that being said, I do see FFC coming this Fall. Though, obviously, they won't be mandatory, and will probably be featured on the phones on par with what's available today. Video out will probably be available sometime, though I don't think in Mango, but it would make sense with Netflix on the device. They won't go with multiple suppliers of processors, that takes away from the consistency of the device... And Qualcomm is a fine manufacturer... Why the need for change here?
Resolution has also been said it won't change, hasn't it? Really don't blame them, again, consistency. As far for hardware adjustments... No... Just... No.
And the memory option affects price. There are 16gb devices, why didn't you get one of those? I have 16gb -.- They need smaller devices to attract different users, you can't only have max devices on the market.
ebzrascal said:
Apple update the spec of their devices every year and I think Microsoft should look to do this also...
In addition to the Gyroscope and new processors metioned at MIX I would like to see the following...
Fall 2011 - Windows Phone 7.5
1. Front Facing Camera - Launched with Live Messenger, Skype etc... - Useless without the Apps. Not sure if Skype wants to tax their network by just letting any and everyone video call right now, TBQH...
2. 16 GB Minimum Memory - I have no space for new APPS on my 8 GB device!! - Why did you buy an 8GB device?
3. SD Card option like on the Samsung Focus as standard. - They're better off setting the minimum storage to 16GB than add a slot IMO. SD Cards lose their utility with the way WP7 uses them, and it's a PITA to use them after you take them out the phone as well...
Fall 2012 - Windows Phone 8
1. DLNA - Stream movies, photos to TV - Standard on High End Android devices.
2. Windows Button to also be 8 directional D-PAD as standard. Huh?
3. Allow remapping of all buttons when in Game Mode. - That still wouldn't make the phone a decent gaming device. Have to go the Sony rought to have something decent, IMO.
3. NFC - contactless mobile payments - Becoming standard on Android phones. Newer Blackberries will ship with this as well, and I suspect the next iPhone will as well as WebOS devices.
4. USB 3 - Unnecessary, IMO.
5. Bluetooth 3 or 4 - Galaxy S phones shipped with 3.0 in the middle of last year... Kinda late for this but it doesn't matter that much if your other devices don't support it, IMO.
6. XGA Resolution 1024 x 768 - Unnecessary on smartphone screens. Even qHD is IMO unecessary on screens 4.3" and below. Apple can afford to put this because they charge a premium for their devices, but it's pretty meh. qHD is decent, this is overkill...
7. HDMI - This is a pretty standard feature these days...
8. Dual Core processors - multiple suppliers - Agree...
I am sure there will be Android devices that meet these specs by late 2012
^ Apart from the screen resolution and USB3, both of which are pipe dreams... There are already Android phones that meet or exceed these specs now...
Low end devices would stay as WP7 and WP8 would support the high end features... Microsoft has already said this is the strategy.
^ Link pls... WTB Windows Phone fragmentation?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If Microsoft wants to wait until Fall 2012 to introduce half that stuff you have listed... They mind as well just give up now.
Do us all a favor and ask them to put better batteries in their smartphones. The issue with smartphones is not the hardware. Even 1st gen snapdragons are good enough to make a good, featureful, performant smartphone OS on... The issue is that these phones last half a day with heavy usage, when you could do 2-3 days of heavy usage on Blackberries and Nokia phones...
No one cares how pretty it is or how well it performs if they are tethered to a charger all the time, and that's pretty much the status quo for WP7/Android/WebOS and to a lesser extent iOS these days...
Even with 1800-1930 mAh batteries phones like the Galaxy S II/Atrix 4G etc. manage to have battery life measured in < a day of moderate use... That's pretty incredible (not in a good way, either). It's time for manufacturers and companies like Microsoft/Google to stop feeding the needless spec bumping and focus on something that matters more - making phones that won't be rendered useless for hours due to being tethered to a charger if you happen to doze off at night before you plug the charger into it.
Better Battery Life in general, as N8ter said. I think this is the thing iOS, wp7 & Android platforms really need to focus on more right now.
16GB minimum internal NAND memory, although I hope to see at least one 32GB or more (probably Nokia) in the next year. Memory is not that expensive, and if we are to have our music collections on our phones, Nokia and Apple are the only ones who seem to get that you need space. I'll pay a little more for enough storage.
The new processor spec's are fine, don't need dual core yet but would like to see them start to come out by early next year.
I really expect a front facing camera phone will be out with Mango due to Skype being released. One of the OEM's will have one as a flagship if not more. But do people really use this feature much? Not really, but it still has uses, and those who will use it and should be available with Mango imo.
Other than that, its additional software features that are needed most. Mango is taking care of a decent list of complaints I had as will Nokias Navtek data/Ovi maps, but there are still many things to be added.
Fall 2012??? OMG... If Mango can do good enough... Mango is still WIP, so why don;t they add some feature that might "Magnet" some other users? 1, 3, 5, 7,8 from Windows Phone 8 are good example to be put on Mango.
dtboos said:
Better Battery Life in general, as N8ter said. I think this is the thing iOS, wp7 & Android platforms really need to focus on more right now.
16GB minimum internal NAND memory, although I hope to see at least one 32GB or more (probably Nokia) in the next year. Memory is not that expensive, and if we are to have our music collections on our phones, Nokia and Apple are the only ones who seem to get that you need space. I'll pay a little more for enough storage.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree, but the manufacturers charge too much for strage. Going from an 8 to 16 GB phone can easily add $100 to the price at times. It's ridiculous. They will nickle and dime at any opportunity.
Nokia phones only needed a decent size ROM. They have SD Card Slots. Same for Windows Mobile and to a lesser extent Android. iOS, WP7, and WebOS devices need at least 16 GB internal storage, because of the lack of an SD slot or the way the phone works with SD Cards (WP7).
The new processor spec's are fine, don't need dual core yet but would like to see them start to come out by early next year.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agree.
I really expect a front facing camera phone will be out with Mango due to Skype being released. One of the OEM's will have one as a flagship if not more. But do people really use this feature much? Not really, but it still has uses, and those who will use it and should be available with Mango imo.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have no use for a FFC, and TBQH, I don't even want a phone with a FFC. I'll take an extra 8GB of space instead of a FFC for same price, plix...
Other than that, its additional software features that are needed most. Mango is taking care of a decent list of complaints I had as will Nokias Navtek data/Ovi maps, but there are still many things to be added.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agree, and Mango needed to be coming out now, not in six months. They really dropped the ball releasing basically a feature phone in the smartphone market.
N8ter said:
I agree, but the manufacturers charge too much for strage. Going from an 8 to 16 GB phone can easily add $100 to the price at times. It's ridiculous. They will nickle and dime at any opportunity.
Nokia phones only needed a decent size ROM. They have SD Card Slots. Same for Windows Mobile and to a lesser extent Android. iOS, WP7, and WebOS devices need at least 16 GB internal storage, because of the lack of an SD slot or the way the phone works with SD Cards (WP7).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nokia's N8 has 64GB internal storage (if I remember correctly). Doesn't NAND memory work better than internal + a removable SD card? I never got great performance out of my SD cards in BB, Android ect. And it seems MS wants everything to be sync'd through zune instead of having removable media ect.
I just hope there is an option for at least 32GB soon, but I would definitely prefer fast and efficient NAND storage like what the Focus has.
I have no use for a FFC, and TBQH, I don't even want a phone with a FFC. I'll take an extra 8GB of space instead of a FFC for same price, plix...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would as well.
dtboos said:
Nokia's N8 has 64GB internal storage (if I remember correctly). Doesn't NAND memory work better than internal + a removable SD card? I never got great performance out of my SD cards in BB, Android ect. And it seems MS wants everything to be sync'd through zune instead of having removable media ect.
I just hope there is an option for at least 32GB soon, but I would definitely prefer fast and efficient NAND storage like what the Focus has.
I would as well.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The N8 does not have 64 GB storage. I'm pretty sure it's 16 GB + SD Card Slot, just like Galaxy S phones...
Yep, just checked... 16 GB Internal Storage with support for up to 32 GB SD Card.
I used to install all my apps to a Class 2 SD Card in Windows Mobile as well as put all my music and videos on it and never had any issues with performance.
In any case, that's not a factor. SD Cards for for media storage, and you can get a high class card if you need it. As long as the phone has a decent amount of internal storage it's not gonna be a problem
I just rather the phone come with at least 16GB internal so I don't feel like I have to splurge for an expensive big SD Card on top of an already expensive device. Plus, it makes a lot of sense...
With the way WP7 works with SD cards, they're better off putting in a large amount of internal storage. SD Cards are how swappable storage and when you make them unswappable it defeats the purpose of even having the slot - especially when you have to factory reset your phone everytime you want to change it (which means you're need to get the biggest card possible off the bad, or deal with a ridiculous inconvenience later on if you want to upgrade it)...
Also, until Microsoft mandates storage types most manufacturers will continue to use SD cards. It allows them to spend VERY little money putting lots of storage whilst charging consumers a ton of money simply because there is a lot of storage there... SD Cards are ridiculously cheap compared to NAND, but you'd never know in the pricing...
Also, if an SD Card goes bad, the phone is much easier to repair than another with a NAND chip soldered in. It's as easy as opening it up, replacing that card, and factory resetting the device then sending it back... That can potentially lower support costs as well
Looks like the 64GB N8 was an april fools gag...I fell for it :O
I wish my Focus had 16GB thats for sure. I chose it as it had the best form factor, best screen, and Samsung's Chipset/Memory was also top notch. Why they chose to only put in 8GB is beyond me.
My question is why is there no ps2 emulator available for our devices?
if you look at the ps2 specs its got a 300mhz processor, 32mb ram, and a gpu which is nothing special.
Why is the ps2 emulator not possible??
Emulation of the ps2 is more complicated than just matching specs
like ram and processor speed. basically software is written and the emulator has to emulate the hardware of the ps2, while still also having to use memory and the processor for other processes. Video emulation, sound emulation, graphic processor, user input, disc drive, memory cards, all of these processes are doing their thing and three load on your processor, and the amount if ram in use, is much higher than just 300mhz and 32 megs.
Take for instance the ps1 emulators available for Android devices, and the emulation still isn't perfect running over 1ghz on our devices.
the very ancient commodore amiga series of computers (a500, etc) would completely underwhelm you with it's memory and processing prowess, but because the architecture has to be processed and all the different systems run in tandem even a lot of people today still have problems with perfect emulation.
is it possible in the foreseeable future as devices grow and are more capable, absolutely, will we see it in the g2? I'm doubtful.
Keep in mind, even the hardware and software emulation created by Sony for the old phat ps3's was not perfect, and actually quite sub par.
I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW HOW CAN MIRACAST ON THIS TABLET I BOUGHT DOR THAT PURPOSE IVE READ ALOT AND NVIDIA WAS SUPPOSE TO ADD THAT FEATURE TO THE TEGRA 3 BUT I CANT GET IT TO WORK OR IT DOESNT HAVE IT AND IF SO IS THEYRE A HACK DRIVER BECAUSE IT DEFINITELY COULD HANDLE IT THANKS
SPECS
Features:
Windows RT operating system
Along with a 1.3GHz NVIDIA Tegra 3 T30 processor, 1500MHz bus speed and 1MB L2 cache allows you to stay connected and productive on the go.
Built-in 802.11b/g/n wireless LAN
Connect to the Internet without wires.
2GB LV memory
For multitasking power.
System Memory (RAM): 2GB
Internal Storage Type: eMMC
Storage Capacity: 32GB
SD Card Slot: Yes
Hey,
So I keep hearing a lot of complaints that the Note 4 processor does not support 64bit (nor does Android 4.4), however, why does that really matter. The Note 4 has 3GB of RAM, not 4GB of RAM, therefore 64bit is not required.
Regards
Well, it's more that the chipset does support 64bit. 64bit is coming to Android, I believe the upcoming version.
The big deal is you can process more information at once on 64bit versus 32bit at one time; actually double. It really doesn't have do with ram. Although ram can be important for storing information to be processed or has been processed. I don't know if Android has the ram issue like Windows does with 32bit versus 64bit; I would look to Linux for an indicator.
This will be more important when we're getting true eight core mobile devices. Real speed doesn't come clock speeds, it's more about the numbers and buses. This is all first semester or basic computer classes everyone has to take in college.
Even though 64-bit is the next big step in smartphone evolution you wont see a night and day difference right out of the gate. The OS, the apps, the UI elements all need to be written and optimized for that architecture. The Note 5 and the S6 will almost certainly have 64-bit processors but that does not mean that suddenly the Note 4 and S5 will be obsolete overnight. If you upgrade every 2 years then the Note 4 should hold its own during that two years.
If the nexus 6 won't come with 64 bit then it's not that important for android right now in the early stages in converting to 64 bit. Android L is just a building block for what's to come.
---------- Post added at 01:14 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:12 PM ----------
lovekeiiy said:
Well, it's more that the chipset does support 64bit. 64bit is coming to Android, I believe the upcoming version.
The big deal is you can process more information at once on 64bit versus 32bit at one time; actually double. It really doesn't have do with ram. Although ram can be important for storing information to be processed or has been processed. I don't know if Android has the ram issue like Windows does with 32bit versus 64bit; I would look to Linux for an indicator.
This will be more important when we're getting true eight core mobile devices. Real speed doesn't come clock speeds, it's more about the numbers and buses. This is all first semester or basic computer classes everyone has to take in college.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No that's not even close to correct.
32 bit and 64 bit have to do with how much memory the processor can address in a cycle. The Amount of memory a 64bit processor can address is about 4billion times as much physical memory. 4gigs is the cap for 32 bit. Which is fine for most applications. I have not seen one smart phone that has that much ram, so at the moment there is no inherent benefit to 64bit processing. Just because the memory addressing capability is there, doesn't mean we can or are going to use it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KgiMzKb8dD0
You really won't see a benefit from 64bit in any device until they start using > 4gigs of ram
Not even an issue until the next, or even the next next, upgrade.... Let the community catch up.
Unless you need to be on the cutting edge... Like the saps that bought into 4k with the lack of 4k programming.
spodemaster said:
---------- Post added at 01:14 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:12 PM ----------No that's not even close to correct.
32 bit and 64 bit have to do with how much memory the processor can address in a cycle. .... at the moment there is no inherent benefit to 64bit processing. Just because the memory addressing capability is there, doesn't mean we can or are going to use it. ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
32 bit vs 64 bit is about bus between the CPU and RAM. This is first semester computer science topic. Everything you talked about is about how it's implemented. I don't know why 4GB of RAM is the minimum of RAM for 64bit systems. I assume it's about efficiencies over 32bit systems. But nonetheless, it's about how much data can be transferred to the CPU at one time.
It's only a matter of time before mobiles devices have 4GB of RAM.
IYet, we all agree, it makes little difference until the applications, and OS, are written and designed to make use of the 64bit architecture.
lovekeiiy said:
The big deal is you can process more information at once on 64bit versus 32bit at one time; actually double. It really doesn't have do with ram.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It really does have to do with RAM though, for a couple of reasons. First, having a larger integer size doesn't really equate to processing things faster in most everyday applications. If you were working with really large numbers it might, but in general it's not really a big draw. Numbers under ~4 billion will process just as quickly on a 32 bit machine as on a 64 bit one. The big draw of 64 bit is definitely being able to address more memory.
Here's the second reason 64 bit matters in regards to RAM: in 64 bit, everything is bigger. Your pointers in memory are now 64 bits long instead of 32 bits (taking twice the space). So are integers. When an application that was 32 bit is recompiled to 64 bit, you can as much as double the amount of RAM is uses while running, even if nothing else changes.
So for me personally, if I don't have more than 4 GB of RAM on my phone, I actually don't want 64 bit processors or applications, because the RAM that I do have is going to be used up more quickly by the larger pointers and integers being stored. I'd personally want to stay away from it until I have a phone with more than 4 GB of RAM, because it's not until you hit that point that 64 bit makes much sense.
lovekeiiy said:
I don't know why 4GB of RAM is the minimum of RAM for 64bit systems. I assume it's about efficiencies over 32bit systems.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Again, it's because 64 bit applications can take as much as double the amount of RAM when they are running due to those larger pointer sizes. If you have a small amount of RAM, you do not want to waste it holding large 64 bit numbers. You want to wait until you have an actual need (such as having more than 4 GB of memory, which is the maximum a 32 bit system can address) before you make the jump to 64 bit. Otherwise, you lose more than you gain.
I'm not necessarily disagreeing with you about the need for RAM in the 64bit architecture. I'm not a programmer, and I know even less about low level programming, which is where more your arguments hold.
With that said, you have implied that it's possible to have 64bit system with less than 4GB of ram. You explained there would probably be more inefficiencies than the benefits gained from being able to process more data at once or at least the system would not run in the most beneficial ways for the end user.
Thus, I still hold big deal about 64bit system is about the amount of information that can be processed at one time. In tech today, it's not really about clock speeds any more. It's about the number of cores and bus size. RAM is important, but not they key, in that it's needed to supported these keys.
In this debate, obviously we may be arguing which came first, the chicken or the egg. We could have more than 4GB RAM in a 32 bit system, but what benefits does it hold? Yet, without the RAM, what benefits can be had from a 64bit system.
Personally, I would like to see a nice otco-core device. I do find mobile chipsets quite fascinating in what they have and can do versus PC counterparts. I just wish, in general, they put a little more GPU power in general in the mobile chips like NVivia does.
lovekeiiy said:
Personally, I would like to see a nice otco-core device. I do find mobile chipsets quite fascinating in what they have and can do versus PC counterparts. I just wish, in general, they put a little more GPU power in general in the mobile chips like NVivia does.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Snapdragon next yr will release an octo core 64 bit. The processor for the note 5 will most likely be the sd 810, octo core,64 bit + 4 gb of Samsung's newest ram. Also the screen will probably be 2k again, but even more perfected.
ryanalan82 said:
Snapdragon next yr will release an octo core 64 bit. The processor for the note 5 will most likely be the sd 810, octo core,64 bit + 4 gb of Samsung's newest ram. Also the screen will probably be 2k again, but even more perfected.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll most likely skip the Note 5, but will probably go Note 6, assuming something, I find, better doesn't come along. I could always use some more screen real estate and some true multi window action like the desktop/laptop OS gives, What can I say, I'm quirky in my demands, and maybe, just maybe, unrealistic is useful features for Joe Public.
Hey guys, was wondering whether there is/was any interest to have Remix 2.0 run on either of these two devices:
G18 (G18REF, Matricom MX2, Generic Droid-TV) with Amlogic 8726MX SoC
M8 (K200) 2GB with Amlogic S802 SoC
General MX2/G18REF Specifications taken from here
G-Box Midnight MX2
Operating system Android 4.2.2
Power5 volts
CPU Amlogic A9
Memory 1GB DDR3
Storage 8GB
Graphics Mali400
Sound A/V, HDMI, S/PDIF
4 USB Ports, S/PDIF Coaxial, HDMI, A/V, SD Slot, Ethernet, IEEE 802.11 b/g/n, 10/100 Ethernet
General OTT M8 Specifications below
Operating System Android 4.4
CPU Cortex-A9r4 2.0GHz
Memory DDR3 2GB; FLASH 8GB
Supported Cards SD/SDHC/MMC
Output Current 1.5A/5V
USB USB2.0
Tagging @codesnake
Hopefully the Devs will read this
Hopefully the Devs will read this OTT M8
I think it is a great idea to make remix os work on this device i have had nothing but problems with this device on stock android what was on it from new Google play services issues crashing etc but it has rendered my box useless collecting dust. I do like remix os and run it on my pc side by side with windows 10 i would like to use it on my tv.
there is the full spec
Hardware Specifications
CPU： Amlogic S802 Quad core Cortex A9 r4 2GHz
GPU： Octa-core Mali-450MP GPU @ 600MHz
FLASH： 8 GB NAND FLASH
SDRAM： 2GB DDR3
Power Supply Specifications
Power Supply： DC5V/2A
Power Indicator (LED)： Power ON :blue; Standby :Red
Main Features
OS： Android 4.3/Android 4.4 KitKat OS
3D： Hardward 3D graphics acceleration
Support Decoder format： HD MPEG1/2/4,H.264, HD AVC/VC-1,RM/RMVB,Xvid/DivX3/4/5/6 ,RealVideo8/9/10
Support Media format： Avi/Rm/Rmvb/Ts/Vob/Mkv/Mov/ISO/wmv/asf/flv/dat/mpg/mpeg
Support Music format： MP3/WMA/AAC/WAV/OGG/AC3/DDP/TrueHD/DTS/DTS/HD/FLAC/APE
Support Photo format： HD JPEG/BMP/GIF/PNG/TIFF
USB host： 2High speed USB 2.0,support USB DISK and USB HDD
Card reader： SD/SDHC/MMC cards
HDD file system： FAT16/FAT32/NTFS
Support Subtitle： SRT/SMI/SUB/SSA/IDX+USB
High Difinition video output： SD/HD max.1920x1080 pixel
OSD type of languages： English/French/German/Spanish/Italian/ etc multilateral languages
LAN： Ethernet:10/100M, standard RJ-45
Wireless： Built in WiFi
Mouse/ Keyboard： Support mouse and keyboard via USB;
Support 2.4GHz/5GHZ wireless mouse and keyboard via 2.4GHz USB dongle
HDMI： HDMI 1.4 up to 4K2K
AV： AV
3G： Support
DOLBY TrueHD and DTS HD： DOLBY TrueHD and DTS HD Bypass through HDMI
chigo58 said:
Hey guys, was wondering whether there is/was any interest to have Remix 2.0 run on either of these two devices:
G18 (G18REF, Matricom MX2, Generic Droid-TV) with Amlogic 8726MX SoC
M8 (K200) 2GB with Amlogic S802 SoC
G-Box Midnight MX2
Operating system Android 4.2.2
Power5 volts
CPU Amlogic A9
Memory 1GB DDR3
Storage 8GB
Graphics Mali400
Sound A/V, HDMI, S/PDIF
4 USB Ports, S/PDIF Coaxial, HDMI, A/V, SD Slot, Ethernet, IEEE 802.11 b/g/n, 10/100 Ethernet
General OTT M8 Specifications below
Operating System Android 4.4
CPU Cortex-A9r4 2.0GHz
Memory DDR3 2GB; FLASH 8GB
Supported Cards SD/SDHC/MMC
Output Current 1.5A/5V
USB USB2.0
Tagging @codesnake
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Would be nice to have RemixOS on my Vega s89-h ( Or my allwinner H8 )
I installed Openelec.. on my unit (i think its V7 )
Its a great alternative if you like kodi..
Cheers
chigo58 said:
Hey guys, was wondering whether there is/was any interest to have Remix 2.0 run on either of these two devices:
G18 (G18REF, Matricom MX2, Generic Droid-TV) with Amlogic 8726MX SoC
M8 (K200) 2GB with Amlogic S802 SoC
Tagging @codesnake
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have 3 OTT M8 boxes scattered around the house and would love a Remix OS build on them.
I dumped the crappy kitkat builds off them after about a week of buying them and run OpenELEC on them. It's fine for just Kodi but the device is capable of so much more.
I think the wife would love it on the one in the kitchen for browsing the web for recipes and the likes, not possible with OpenElec
So there's a big fat +1 for me on this. :good:
Any updates? Would love to use Remix OS on my M8
that would be great on S802/S805/S812
Would love remix on my onda v975m its based on the m802