Post your score and your rom/kernel and any setting's that you have changed to get that score.
"if verifiable" You go to the front page and get the honorary tile of "Note 3 king"
UPDATE*
Thread Rules
1. Rom and Kernel plus the version must be stated.
2. All changes to achieve that score must all be included
3. Be varied by another person on this thread.
►►camoway is the note 3 king◄◄
AnTuTu:37609
Rom: Jedi Elite V3.1 || *11|06*
Kernel: COMPULSION KERNEL "ULTIMATE VERSION" 6.0
cpu: set to 2.65mhz
all other setting stock/unchanged
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Stock Rooted.
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk 2
Stock
Sent from my SM-N900T using xda app-developers app
I believe this was Jedi V2, and his kernel at the redline. I got my best numbers by letting the phone sit idle for a while, then testing.
Stock deodexed, Lean Kernel by Imoseyon and top secret settings and procedures.
N900T
I understand you guys are getting great scores but I thought the thread is about "how to get them" as well, lol. Please share if you can. Thank you.
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk 2
Really dont bother posting if your not going to share "exactly how you got that score" it is not for this thread.
Sent from my SM-N900T using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Ok, sorry.
N900T
How to get comparable scores? Try to OC the CPU and GPU as much as possible, increase the thermal precaution limit (Kernal w/ toolbox settings), and toss it in the freezer so it doesn't throttle from heat; BAM! Unrealistically high and non-applicable real life socres.
Quadrant standard : 23653
Rom : wicked 2.1
Kernel : Trinity B48
Cpu : 2419
None of that antutu bulls*#t!!
Sent from my SM-N900T using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Stock Rooted!
Quadrant Standard: 24083
Everything Stock
Screen On Time: roughly 6+ hours (2hrs @ 68% left)
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk 2
Trinity_Nuff Said
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk
Linpack is the only relevant tool m flops is the only real cpu benchmark it should be added to your measurements
Sent from my SM-N900W8 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
My ram speed in Antutu is very low.
Enviado desde mi SM-N9005 usando Tapatalk 2
DAGr8 said:
Linpack is the only relevant tool m flops is the only real cpu benchmark it should be added to your measurements
Sent from my SM-N900W8 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stock rooted. Can't wait to OC to 3Ghz.
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk 2
Second run, just in case.
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk 2
Wow never got anything high like this l am running Minimalistic Kernel at 2.8 ghz
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk
Rom: Stock DeOdexed TW 4.3 (Heavily debloated)
Kernel: LeanKernel v1.12 @ 2.8ghz
CPU Governor: InteractiveX
GPU Governor: msm-adreno-tz
IO Scheduler: Deadline (both)
Read Ahead KB: 512 (both)
Swappiness: 0
Internal/External Entropy Contribution: Off
Slowest note 3
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk
Limeybastard said:
Slowest note 3View attachment 2656195View attachment 2656196
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What are you running? Did you tweak for battery?
Related
I'm noticing a big battery drain from my screen, just curious what other peoples usage is like and what you have for brightness settings:
ROM: BlackIce Kangorade
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my Incredible 2 using xda app-developers app
I've always had the understanding that your screen should use the most. Here is mine in HORRIBLE coverage (no bars and back and forth from 3G to 1x) normally my screen % is pretty close to yours. I am running aokp build 38 with auto brightness oc to 1113 max 245 min uv -1 step across the board with smartassV2 governor and noop scheduler.
Sent from my ICS Dinc2
Aero's cm9 0712 v9 kernal
max cpu 1.3 and min 245
wifi, gps on and always on wifi at home
all sync is on.
sjpritch25 said:
Aero's cm9 0712 v9 kernal
max cpu 1.3 and min 245
wifi, gps on and always on wifi at home
all sync is on.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine usually looks like yours. Only difference in our setups is I'm on the v10 kernel. (Not 10.5)
Another way to increase battery life/decrease that screen percentage is to use custom backlight settings and levels. I found some in a thread here a while back that helped my battery life significantly on the stock battery. Using the same setup as above poster and the custom backlight settings I get ~3 days on an extended battery with light usage.
Sent from my Incredible 2 using xda premium
I think 10.5 is not great on battery life.
I can provide the v10 kernel via Dropbox if you guys want....I haven't seen it anywhere lately.
Credit to Aeroevan of course for the the awesome kernel.
http://db.tt/z04thxUt
Sent from my Incredible 2 using xda premium
jtsrtr13 said:
I can provide the v10 kernel via Dropbox if you guys want....I haven't seen it anywhere lately.
Credit to Aeroevan of course for the the awesome kernel.
http://db.tt/z04thxUt
Sent from my Incredible 2 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ive been running aeroeven v9 for a couple days now and I'm liking it, so I'm a little hesitant to try v10
Sent from my Incredible 2 using xda app-developers app
I'm also running Aeroevan's CM9 (7/12), but using the 10.5 kernel. No overclocking, and I have the brightness on auto at all times. Have the wifi on when at home, scarcely have GPS on. Sync on all the time. I usually get two days of battery life, but at that point the battery goes down to under 10%, so I usually charge at least once a day to keep it higher.
Aero's 0723 JB build & his kernel.
Sent from my Incredible 2 using xda app-developers app
sjpritch25 said:
Aero's 0723 JB build & his kernel.
Sent from my Incredible 2 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow, stock battery???
Sent from my Incredible 2 using xda app-developers app
Triscuit said:
Wow, stock battery???
Sent from my Incredible 2 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, but still not as good as aero's cm9 with his v9 kernal.
This is a direct port of my kernel on the international I9300 Galaxy S3 and sidekick to the international N7100/5 Note 2 kernels.
Recap of features:
CPU overclocking up to 1.8GHz and undervolting from 600mV to 1400mV.
GPU overclocking and undervolting.
GPU scaling reworked.
Screen sharpness and colour modifications.
Extended Pegasusq and improved Performance governors.
Removed Touch Booster and replaced with custom Flexrate mechanic.
Improved scheduler power management for improved idle residencies on auxiliary CPUs.
USB charging rate limit increased to 900mA.
This is supposed to be merely a proxy thread. Please refer to the N7100/5 thread for full changelogs, explanations, bug-reports and other issues. Kernel for specific device versions will be posted here.
This kernel is for the North American T-Mobile variant SCH-T889. Versions for other variants are found in their respective forums.
So we flash the tar with odin???
Sent from my SGH-T889 using XDA Premium HD app
Odin or mobile Odin. Anyway I resolved the size issues and also made CWMs.
Thanks trying out now
Sent from my SGH-T889 using XDA Premium HD app
Thanks, will test for the next couple days. No real nees for me to OC as this device is already a screamer. Personally im after even more battery life.
Sent from my Galaxy Note 2
farfromovin said:
Thanks, will test for the next couple days. No real nees for me to OC as this device is already a screamer. Personally im after even more battery life.
Sent from my Galaxy Note 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed.Performance is Already Screaming fast in MY Opinion,and to reach even more battery life would be cool And Something I an personally interested in. Please let Us know if this increases battery life even more so than Stock, I really don't care about Overlooking at all. SO FAST already!
Perseus are custom and Kennel T889 are stock ? Thank for support us.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Nice solid kernel. Will we see more govoners in the near feature?
VIIRU§ said:
View attachment 1439199
Nice solid kernel. Will we see more govoners in the near feature?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
did you flash the perseus kernel???
slimc84 said:
did you flash the perseus kernel???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes
Sent from my SGH-T889 using xda premium
VIIRU§ said:
Nice solid kernel. Will we see more govoners in the near feature?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, because they're useless. If you want to change the scaling logics then pegasusq has all the variable knobs configurable to tweak or emulate other governors at disposition.
I'd also prefer if people stop posting Quadrant scores as it's a completely outdated and non representative benchmark.
This kernel seems pretty solid....flashed on Xquizit v2 and running great....
running good thanks first screen shot(left) is you kernel. 2nd without. its at the bottom from spot 2729 to 789 id call that great improvement .
Questions to the OP. Did you compile this rom from our sources or is this an actual direct port?
Sent from my SGH-T889 using xda premium
VIIRU§ said:
Questions to the OP. Did you compile this rom from our sources or is this an actual direct port?
Sent from my SGH-T889 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is a kernel and not a rom.
Sent from my SGH-T889 using Tapatalk 2
Im gonna underclock to 1200 lol.
Sent from my Galaxy Note 2
thanks man that was quick... gonna be flashing this asap, just got one question.... why flash using odin when you got cwm?
please I need the Stock Kernel as soon as possible .
redbike said:
please I need the Stock Kernel as soon as possible .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
???Did you not read the OP???
redbike said:
please I need the Stock Kernel as soon as possible .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
paul89 said:
???Did you not read the OP???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
10 char
Sent from my SGH-T889 using xda premium
Well here is mine its not bad considering I've got just barley 1 gig ram free....
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Here's my processor benchmark through romtoolbox:
Sent from my LG-LS970 using Tapatalk 4
All right come on guys 60 views n not 1 reply ... I can't b the only one who's ran benchmarks on this phone ....let's c what everyone pulls and then can pull an average score for our phone ...
Sent from my finger tips to you're eye's !
Sent from my LG-LS970 using xda app-developers app
Here's mine on Stock / Liberty at 1.8Ghz
well dang do u not have many apps installed ? mine is after having widgets and all that installed .. know u make me wanna c what mine does bare :0
bigfdaddy2 said:
well dang do u not have many apps installed ? mine is after having widgets and all that installed .. know u make me wanna c what mine does bare :0
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The stock ROM has always been the fastest. I have about 160 Apps installed. The trick to get the stock ROM real fast is to delete the thermald binary and then undervolt it to keep the temps down. I run 150mv undervolt.
Where is the thermald binary located?
Sent from my LG-LS970 using xda app-developers app
cgtrr34 said:
Where is the thermald binary located?
Sent from my LG-LS970 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
/system/bin
Stock locked and unrooted.
Sent from my LG-LS970 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
My quadrant score -------->
What quadrant says our device capable of ----->
Which is more accurate ...1 says phone slower then s3 or not that puts this device up on top ? Lol ....
Sent from my fingertips to you're eyeballs !
Just screwing around I decided to do one with everything I could to save battery and the other I pumped everything up. CPU max freq, performance governor, GPU max performance governor, eco mode off... Quite a difference lol
Sent from my LG-LS970 using Tapatalk 4
hi i was just cheking some.options and get to see that u can put 1,5ghz but the mp option or setting keep switching your clock to 1.1ghz i turn it off and dont close the kernel mod app. and it keep the setting of 1.5ghz on all clock when needed this is on stock rom stock kernel ondemand gov stock gpu, just able.to use the 1,5ghz the phone bring.
Sent from my LG-LS970 using xda app-developers app
look guys i just closed all apps on task manager and my clock settings all got changed to 1.1ghz.... this is so annoying...any know how to stop this??
Sent from my LG-LS970 using xda app-developers app
nightmare509 said:
look guys i just closed all apps on task manager and my clock settings all got changed to 1.1ghz.... this is so annoying...any know how to stop this??
Sent from my LG-LS970 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you using set cpu or rom toolbox or anything like that?
Sent from my LG-LS970 using Tapatalk 4
no just trickster mod app
Sent from my LG-LS970 using xda app-developers app
---------- Post added at 06:55 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:50 PM ----------
at this point no but used it to test but keep do in all the same stuff
and i restarted the phone and every setting on trickster got to default and clock still at 1.1ghz so basically i have to manualy put it to 1.5ghz and not close the trickster app and MP option got turned on again
Sent from my LG-LS970 using xda app-developers app
Are you making sure to click the check in the upper right corner and pressing menu and enabling set at boot? Common things that I missed the first time using trickster lol
Sent from my LG-LS970 using Tapatalk 4
Scores
first pic is current and the other is my record. Also is my record using quadrant but i heard it isnr as accurate so i dont use it anymore... both AnTuTu pics running nexOgen 1.6 and ZVC viper OC kernel, interactive Governor at 1.836 Max Freq. Tons of apps installed, and lots of tweaks/mods.
I got 18655 running Spleef's Pacman rom full throttle and 18509 running Neighborhood's Pacman rom full throttle. It only drops down to about 18000 when I make the numbers more conservative for battery conservation. Not bad...
This is what I get running my normal daily driver at 1.5ghz. Rooted, unlocked stock zvc using viper1.1 kernel. Performance is great even at 1.5 but I get anywhere from 24-30 hours of battery use on a full charge with moderate/average use.
Here is my antutu score. Its less than Galaxy S4 which has same CPU as OGP. It is because of software optimisations?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my LG-E980 using xda app-developers app
Edit: I'm running CM10.2 M1.
It's just little tweaks here and there, see here is mine which blows the gs4 out of the water.
sent from my OG PRO using tapatalk 4
Is that OGP? If it is then Why does antutu recognize it as N5?
Sent from my LG-E980 using xda app-developers app
Yea it is, but for some reason it s shows up as a nexus 5 sometimes.
sent from my OG PRO using tapatalk 4
Mine does that also.
_________________
Beavers & Ducks!
adizzle23 said:
It's just little tweaks here and there, see here is mine which blows the gs4 out of the water.
sent from my OG PRO using tapatalk 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awesome score :good:
would you please share your tweaks with us?
Stock ROM stock Kernel no optimizations.... decent score
Maybe we can share detailed scoresand then optimize parts to score higher... e. g. if someone is getting some gain in 2D performance he can share his additions/tweaks
Sent from my LG-F240K using xda app-developers app
Sorry but I should have pointed out that this was with a custom kernel running carbon 4.3.1 but now I'm running a different setup so can't really remember how I got that score. I will see what I can find on a old backup.
sent from my OG PRO using tapatalk 4
E980 - Latest Harmony Build of BeanStalk.
StarkV5 said:
Here is my antutu score. Its less than Galaxy S4 which has same CPU as OGP. It is because of software optimisations?
View attachment 2371930
View attachment 2371931
View attachment 2371936
Sent from my LG-E980 using xda app-developers app
Edit: I'm running CM10.2 M1.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got the same as you, which was weird, because I got high 27,000's while running CM. You running Vanir?
Sent from my Optimus G Pro using Tapatalk 4 Beta
TheAfroGuy said:
I got the same as you, which was weird, because I got high 27,000's while running CM. You running Vanir?
Sent from my Optimus G Pro using Tapatalk 4 Beta
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep! My sig below says it all. BTW the GPU in Vanir is underclocked to 320Mhz. Stock has 400Mhz
StarkV5 said:
Yep! My sig below says it all. BTW the GPU in Vanir is underclocked to 320Mhz. Stock has 400Mhz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't see it! My bad! Lol
I got higher scores while running different ROMs, but Vanir is sooooooo fast!
Sent from my Optimus G Pro using Tapatalk 4 Beta
TheAfroGuy said:
I got the same as you, which was weird, because I got high 27,000's while running CM. You running Vanir?
Sent from my Optimus G Pro using Tapatalk 4 Beta
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow. I have used most of the custom rom, and yet to have score above high 26k's. In fact, I found that most of the custom rom are slower than stock (on benchmark).
What CM build did you use? And phone version? I am using an E988
Here's my geekbench 3 score.. Blows Galaxy S4 and HTC One out of water.
Sent from my Optimus G Pro using xda app-developers app
This is the best I have seen on my device
All credits to @madmack and other devs for supporting development on this device constantly. The score is better than what I could get on stock!
Miui v5 11.27
Sent from my Optimus G Pro using xda app-developers app
hihi
Stock Rooted and Debloated and optimized my own way.
Sent from my LG-E988 using Tapatalk
I am stock rooted with ALL Att and most LG bloat uninstalled. I run consistently with 1.2 gb free Ram. All that and I still only get 15000 on the newest version of ANTUTU
And I thought it was running pretty nice and smooth?
Edit... I restarted and ran again. getting 25,500 now. Not sure what was going on?
using root explorer or alike go to d/acpuclk/pvs_bin. Use text reader to open it and you should see a number. The higher the number the better quality your chip is suppose to be. I think highest is 0 or 6. 0-6
Tweaked Alpha powered by Lean Kernel
All credit sshafranko
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk
Mine was a zero! But like the man said it's either zero or 6 that's the highest. I run my cpu at 3.0 ghz. So... maybe 0 is good?
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk
mine was a 3...
i love being average :\
Ok found out the skinny.
0 requires the least power but is sensitive to overclock.
6 is resilient to overclock and consumes more power because of leakage.
You can read the articles by go ogling *snapdragon cpu bin*
So I guess my chip is a power saver. But I'm able to oc like crazy...so I don't know how significant this really is. My note 3 has been running at 2.8 ghz for DAYS without a problem.
So basically binning has to do with the chips leaking power with 6 being the #leakiest#
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk
janjannsen99 said:
Ok found out the skinny.
0 requires the least power but is sensitive to overclock.
6 is resilient to overclock and consumes more power because of leakage.
You can read the articles by go ogling *snapdragon cpu bin*
So I guess my chip is a power saver. But I'm able to oc like crazy...so I don't know how significant this really is. My note 3 has been running at 2.8 ghz for DAYS without a problem.
So basically binning has to do with the chips leaking power with 6 being the #leakiest#
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you tried benchmarking clocked to 2.8 and 3.0? I bet it reboots if you try it. I have a 3.
No reboots buddy
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
That's 2.8
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk
janjannsen99 said:
No reboots buddy
That's 2.8
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's a pretty low score for being clocked to 2.8, mine scores that clocked to 2.419 on saber. That's good it doesn't reboot anyways.
I don't really care about scores I have 400 apps man lol I think that might have a small impact on my score haha. Yes it does work no problem on 2.8 with a zero bin cpu. I use imoseyon kernel for daily driver. I've also been able to boot the 3 gigahertz kernel too for about 5 minutes before it crashes out.
But what the articles from qualcomm were saying that binning has more to do with power leakage than anything else, e.g. excessive heat, battery drain, etc. So the lower the number the more "efficient" the chip is but less stable and the higher less stable less efficient and more stable for overclock. Think like a boat. One has holes in it with 2 300hp Honda engines the other boat has few holes and 2 300hp off brand less powerful bootleg engines.
They still go just about as fast but one is a little slower. However on the other boat you're scooping water sometimes lol.
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk
I'm a 3 also
Sent from my SM-N900T using xda premium
janjannsen99 said:
using root explorer or alike go to d/acpuclk/pvs_bin. Use text reader to open it and you should see a number. The higher the number the better quality your chip is suppose to be. I think highest is 0 or 6. 0-6
Tweaked Alpha powered by Lean Kernel
All credit sshafranko
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm showing a 4. I wonder how much a difference this actually has in the phones, it seems pretty minimal to none.
1 here
Sent from my SM-N900T using xda app-developers app
Bin of 2 here. I'm all about the power saving though lol. I run 2.5ghz every now and then which is pretty stable haven't benchmarked with it though.
Sent from my SM-N900T
Also have 2 here.
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk 4
..
Wow 400 apps, I bet you use 375 of those apps once a year maybe....lol :good:
Quickvic30 said:
Wow 400 apps, I bet you use 375 of those apps once a year maybe....lol :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea I know. I gotta get rid of some man its crazy
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk
The binning seems pretty random. I wonder if it's even important at all. ..
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk
I am bin 2 and running 2.96 ghz
Sent from my SM-N900T
Ima a bin 3 and can over clock to 3ghz and underclock 75 on mpu so im good where i am
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk
2, running stock speeds and voltages (whatever compulsion standard kernel sets it at).