Related
...make a boot.img containing king kernel #4 cfs sense and post it for me. I would do it myself, but it never seems to work.
Sent from my Incredible using XDA App
This is posted in the wrong forum
GMK83 said:
This is posted in the wrong forum
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is a request for something requiring decompiling of a boot.img...this seems like development request to me.
Sent from my Incredible using XDA App
jdkoreclipse said:
This is a request for something requiring decompiling of a boot.img...this seems like development request to me.
Sent from my Incredible using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It belongs in the questions section.
Point and counterpoint...
It's a question, yes, but a question about development, so theoretically, it could go in either subforum. Fairly sure he posted it here because A)there's more dev's that could help with this question here in the development subforum and B)I know he's got a hell of a good reputation here in the dev forums so it'll probably be easier to get the help he needs and deserves. *sigh* I guess I'm just pointing out once again that the site we all know and love DOES go by a three letter moniker, but those three letters are XDA not PMS... lol
rekanpwnsall said:
I Love You.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol I think you're pretty special, too! (^_^)>b glad to know I'm not the only one who knows the true definition of "community"... see #'s 3,5,7,8 & 9
com·mu·ni·ty
[kuh-myoo-ni-tee]
–noun, plural -ties.
1.
a social group of any size whose members reside in a specific locality, share government, and often have a common cultural and historical heritage.
2.
a locality inhabited by such a group.
3.
a social, religious, occupational, or other group sharing common characteristics or interests and perceived or perceiving itself as distinct in some respect from the larger society within which it exists (usually prec. by the ): the business community; the community of scholars.
4.
a group of associated nations sharing common interests or a common heritage: the community of Western Europe.
5.
Ecclesiastical . a group of men or women leading a common life according to a rule.
6.
Ecology . an assemblage of interacting populations occupying a given area.
7.
joint possession, enjoyment, liability, etc.: community of property.
8.
similar character; agreement; identity: community of interests.
9.
the community, the public; society: the needs of the community.
If someone wishes to comply with his request, please notify him by PM.
Thread closed.
I just wanted to make a point here, which I guess the admin must be unaware of.
Personally having been here at XDA since 2007, I still use the "XDA classic" skin. However I recently was using the "XDA 2010" skin, and noticed something unusual about the differences between the two skins when you report a post.
With XDA classic when you report a post it says this:
Note: This is ONLY to be used to report spam, advertising messages, and problematic (harassment, fighting, or rude) posts.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
However with the XDA 2010 skin it notes something completely different:
So you want to report a post. Please read this first!
If a member is being unruly or offensive OR if you want to request that a post/thread be moved/deleted,
you MUST contact the specific moderator of this forum directly via PM. Do not use the form below.
Here is a list of forum-specific moderators. [Link to Google Document]
Please only submit this form if you are reporting a copyright violation or if someone has violated another XDA rule.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
..and obviously if you are using TapaTalk or the XDA app, you don't get either of these messages.
I don't know how long this message in the XDA 2010 skin has asked members to not use the report button for offensive posts or misplaced threads, but this is news to me.
Please advise.
This was only put in place in the last few weeks. It's there to prevent users using the RP form for trivial issues such as posts in the wrong forum, or minor flaming/trolling issues, that can all easily be solved by a PM to the moderator allocated to that specific forum.
I'll flag to the admin that it's missing from the classic template.
Thanks. This change seems like it will only serve to make these "trivial" type of infractions more acceptable. In my personal opinion it's these trivial infractions which are making some of the forums here more of a garbage dump than the great info sharing site that xda once was.
It shouldn't as far as I can see...the person reporting just has to PM the forum mod, rather than submit the report using the form...nothing is different with regards to what is acceptable or not.
But it's a system that's being tweaked so there may be more changes down the track.
Thanks for the explanation.
We'll update classic.
There are a lot of features that 2010 has that classic doesn't, because we really don't support classic anymore. It's there for those that want to use it, but our data shows that 95%+ of XDA users on 2010.
svetius said:
our data shows that 95%+ of XDA users on 2010.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That may be true, but my data also shows that 90% of all forum users on the internet use the default forum skin.
indagroove said:
That may be true, but my data also shows that 90% of all forum users on the internet use the default forum skin.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The default skin for users is now XDA 2010 iirc. I believe you only get the old one if you were registered before that date.
pulser_g2 said:
The default skin for users is now XDA 2010 iirc. I believe you only get the old one if you were registered before that date.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That was kinda my point.
I'm glad the users like the 2010 skin, but xda just isn't the same to me without classic.
agree with indagroove. Chasing down forum mods via p.m. is quite a pain in the butt and there seems to be quite an increase in flaming/ language going on lately.
I don't even get the forum mod list, just that I need to contact the mod for the specific forum.
Too complicated now to bother, but it wouldn't suprise me to see people turned off of xda due to the flaming they are receiving just for asking questions.
You can just peruse the WP7 general forums to see how much flaming goes on (and the mods there have done a great job, but it gets out of hand quickly).
Just my 2 cents.
Why are you judging members by their post count?
For lack of a better alternative. I challenge anyone to come up with a better alternative, and share it with us. Over the years we have seen the impact the cluttering up of developmental fora had on the amount of energy needed to keep threads in shape or visible. This wasn't productive at all. We get that people might have experience from other fora and think this is a little over the top for them, but there are rarely any developers amongst the people that want to create new threads. There are a few people with a genuine need to post a thread in the developmental fora (developers), these people can contact a moderator to help them get sorted.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am an experienced Unix and Android user who has been on XDA for more than year. Then why less than 10 posts? I never needed to post, if i had questions i would search and get the answers. the problem began when i had to post in dev sections for questions or answers relating a particular roms.
i do understand why the limit exist and off-course u cant look into someone's eye and determine if he really is a spammer or an experienced dev.
So i came up with an alternative. the number 10 is fine . but it should be 10 posts + thanks + recomendations. Meaning... if i am a new registered user but an experienced dev. to get my 10 beers i would have to post usefull answers which would count as posts, but if someone clicks thanks it should could towards my 10 beers since it was a useful post. There should also be a "recommend me" button for all below 10 post users. where if other users recommend me for the 10+ group it counts to my 10 beers. So i could be allowed to post in dev section if i havw only 2 posts where i have been thanked by 5 users and recomended by 3 users. (5 +2+3) = 10 beers.... Let me know what you guys think
Promotions
This same logic can be used for promoting from Jr. Member to Member to Sr Member and so on.
you know i am a senior Member if i have only 20 posts but 80 people have THANKED them? just that unlike above recommendations wont exist here.
EDITED for better clarification:
I agree that it is easy to get the 10 posts. what my second part of the thread is that. we should consider giving credibility to folks who post better quality of posts which are actually quite helpful. please bear in mind that i am not trying to say that we should combine posts and thanks... what i am saying is a person who posted 80 posted and got 40 thanks for the same deserves more credibility than the user who posts 100 posts with no thanks at all. and that since the prior user has better quality of posts we should consider promoting him to Sr Member. (giving credibility for the quality of him posts.)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
kkoolpatz said:
I am an experienced Unix and Android user who has been on XDA for more than year. Then why less than 10 posts? I never needed to post, if i had questions i would search and get the answers. the problem began when i had to post in dev sections for questions or answers relating a particular roms.
i do understand why the limit exist and off-course u cant look into someone's eye and determine if he really is a spammer or an experienced dev.
So i came up with an alternative. the number 10 is fine . but it should be 10 posts + thanks + recomendations. Meaning... if i am a new registered user but an experienced dev. to get my 10 beers i would have to post usefull answers which would count as posts, but if someone clicks thanks it should could towards my 10 beers since it was a useful post. There should also be a "recommend me" button for all below 10 post users. where if other users recommend me for the 10+ group it counts to my 10 beers. So i could be allowed to post in dev section if i havw only 2 posts where i have been thanked by 5 users and recomended by 3 users. (5 +2+3) = 10 beers.... Let me know what you guys think
Promotions
This same logic can be used for promoting from Jr. Member to Member to Sr Member and so on.
you know i am a senior Member if i have only 20 posts but 80 people have THANKED them? just that unlike above recommendations wont exist here.
And whats with the 8 post limit for the signatures?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i believe its 100 post for Senior
Debel said:
i believe its 100 post for Senior
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i know that, but if you care to read the whole thing, you would know what i mean by 20 posts and 80 thanks (20 +80 =100)
kkoolpatz said:
i know that, but if you care to read the whole thing, you would know what i mean by 20 posts and 80 thanks (20 +80 =100)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It isn't difficult to get to ten posts. This is a community, not a support forum. We want to encourage members to participate here in order to join the community. That as well as a way to combat spam are the reasons behind the ten post rule.
I understand what you are saying, but it's pretty easy to get 10 posts. I mean I have been here for about a month and I have over 100 posts. Doesn't take long at all, all I do is reply to questions that I can answer and hopefully help with. It's one way I can help here because I am still working on developing and no where near as talented as some of the folks on here.
While its pretty easy to get ten posts its also pretty easy for us to catch the people who go about it the wrong way and show them the error of their ways.
Sent From My Fingers To Your Face.......
conantroutman said:
While its pretty easy to get ten posts its also pretty easy for us to catch the people who go about it the wrong way and show them the error of their ways.
Sent From My Fingers To Your Face.......
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What about the promotions part of my essay? Again it may be easy to get 100 posts too, but hey... would'nt it be awarding to promote a user to Sr Member at 90 posts (plus considerable number of THANKS) because his 90 were better than the other users 100 post?
kkoolpatz said:
What about the promotions part of my essay? Again it may be easy to get 100 posts too, but hey... would'nt it be awarding to promote a user to Sr Moderator at 90 posts (plus considerable number of THANKS) because his 90 were better than the other users 100 post?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well that would be a decision for the admins.
I assume you meant senior member not moderator.
Sent From My Fingers To Your Face.......
conantroutman said:
I assume you meant senior member not moderator.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, corrected in my post. Thanks for pointing that out.
kkoolpatz said:
What about the promotions part of my essay? Again it may be easy to get 100 posts too, but hey... would'nt it be awarding to promote a user to Sr Member at 90 posts (plus considerable number of THANKS) because his 90 were better than the other users 100 post?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks count should remain separate from post count. The titles need reworking anyway, but your idea isn't half bad. Try raising the idea in the requests thread sticky.
Explain my post count , yes it's easy to get 10 posts
Herpderp Defy.
It may be easy to get the requisite 10 posts, but I still think his idea deserves consideration.
Though you'd really want a weighting system of some kind. For example, 1 post with 5 'thanks' counts as 2 posts, but with 10 'thanks' it counts as 4 posts. I don't know, something along those lines.
kiswa said:
It may be easy to get the requisite 10 posts, but I still think his idea deserves consideration.
Though you'd really want a weighting system of some kind. For example, 1 post with 5 'thanks' counts as 2 posts, but with 10 'thanks' it counts as 4 posts. I don't know, something along those lines.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is no reason to have the thanks count towards your posts. I'm in favor of it counting towards the meaningless titles that appear under your names, but that about it. It's really not that hard to get ten posts. I can't understand why you guys make it seem like the end of the world...
cajunflavoredbob said:
There is no reason to have the thanks count towards your posts. I'm in favor of it counting towards the meaningless titles that appear under your names, but that about it. It's really not that hard to get ten posts. I can't understand why you guys make it seem like the end of the world...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe saying they should count as posts wasn't the right word, but having some kind of 'credibility' rating based on some weighted ratio of thanks to posts could certainly be a useful metric to determine someones ability to post in a restricted space.
I'd much rather have someone with 5 posts that has been thanked 30 times be allowed in a restricted section, over someone with 5000 posts and 30 thanks.
Of course, that all assumes people appropriately use the thanks system, so yeah.
I can't understand why people jump to hyperbole and assume some kind of personal attack is meant when others are merely attempting to discuss a topic of interest on a public forum. Weird, right?
kiswa said:
Maybe saying they should count as posts wasn't the right word, but having some kind of 'credibility' rating based on some weighted ratio of thanks to posts could certainly be a useful metric to determine someones ability to post in a restricted space.
I'd much rather have someone with 5 posts that has been thanked 30 times be allowed in a restricted section, over someone with 5000 posts and 30 thanks.
Of course, that all assumes people appropriately use the thanks system, so yeah.
I can't understand why people jump to hyperbole and assume some kind of personal attack is meant when others are merely attempting to discuss a topic of interest on a public forum. Weird, right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The bottom line here is that we want members to actively involve themselves in the community, gaining ten proper posts is a good way to encourage this.
Theres also the issue of the thanks meter being essentially meaningless as someone could make two posts in off topic and easily gain ten thanks. (They'll thank anything in there )
I don't foresee a change to this rule anytime soon but I dare say that if changes are considered further down the line then this will probably come up for discussion.
kiswa said:
Maybe saying they should count as posts wasn't the right word, but having some kind of 'credibility' rating based on some weighted ratio of thanks to posts could certainly be a useful metric to determine someones ability to post in a restricted space.
I'd much rather have someone with 5 posts that has been thanked 30 times be allowed in a restricted section, over someone with 5000 posts and 30 thanks.
Of course, that all assumes people appropriately use the thanks system, so yeah.
I can't understand why people jump to hyperbole and assume some kind of personal attack is meant when others are merely attempting to discuss a topic of interest on a public forum. Weird, right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Once again, there is no reason to combine the thanks by any means into post count. I know what you are suggesting, but it isn't a good idea. weighting post count by means of thanks is opening the doors that were just closed for more spam. Why do you guys not see how simple it is to gain ten posts? Why would you not want to be a part of this community? That's what it's all about.
Also, I did not personally attack you at any point during either response, nor did I take your posts as attacks. Just because I point out flaws in your idea doesn't mean I dislike you as a person, just your one, singular idea by itself. Please remain civil.
I agree that it is easy to get the 10 posts. what my second part of the thread is that. we should consider giving credibility to folks who post better quality of posts which are actually quite helpful. please bear in mind that i am not trying to say that we should combine posts and thanks... what i am saying is a person who posted 80 posted and got 40 thanks for the same deserves more credibility than the user who posts 100 posts with no thanks at all. and that since the prior user has better quality of posts we should consider promoting him to Sr Member. (giving credibility for the quality of him posts.)
While I understand what you're saying, I don't think it's fair to judge a member on other members' use of the thanks button. You still see plenty of people actually posting "thanks", and not clicking it.
This can't be quanitified so it would be unfair.
kkoolpatz said:
I agree that it is easy to get the 10 posts. what my second part of the thread is that. we should consider giving credibility to folks who post better quality of posts which are actually quite helpful. please bear in mind that i am not trying to say that we should combine posts and thanks... what i am saying is a person who posted 80 posted and got 40 thanks for the same deserves more credibility than the user who posts 100 posts with no thanks at all. and that since the prior user has better quality of posts we should consider promoting him to Sr Member. (giving credibility for the quality of him posts.)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The problem with that is only that the titles under the names are as meaningless as the thanks count. Just because it says Senior Member, that doesn't really get you any new amount of respect or anything. It doesn't let you post in any new forums. It's just a title change.
We've long argued for a better title system here. We've also long been ignored on it. We've previously stated that this system that you are proposing is very much open to excessive abuse. The other thing is that simply making someone a Senior Member has absolutely no benefits whatsoever.
cajunflavoredbob said:
The other thing is that simply making someone a Senior Member has absolutely no benefits whatsoever.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree. At 35xx posts They should call you the same as what they would name a person with 100 posts. the title system certainly need a big revamp.
Suggestions/Alternatives
*Change 10 post to x number of thanks - Pros : It would take longer for users to gain access to development forums. - Cons : Users will beg for thanks more and possibly spam thanks to help each other gain access.
*Complete a quiz during registration - Pros : Could possibly reduce the number of people allowed in development forums. - Cons : Too hard because different people have different levels of knowledge + couldn't be multiple choice because too easy to get around.
*Let OPs of dev threads delete posts - Pros : Cut down on the useless posts. - Cons : Won't happen because only mods/admins will have ability to delete posts. Devs could show favouritism + take too much of the devs time to delete posts.
*Review posts before they appear in development - Pros : If possible, no crap would appear in dev threads. - Cons : Not possible because of the massive workload on the manpower of the mods.
*Deny access to Off-topic until user has 10 posts - Pros : Stops a lot of people posting there to get to 10 posts. - Cons : Users will be more likely to spam in the device forums instead.
*
Alternative to 10 post rule
I'm creating this thread as a place to centralize all alternative ideas to the 10 post rule.
Obviously, a lot of different suggestions have been made over the time and we've been told that the admins won't change the rule unless a better solution can be proven to work.
So if you have any suggestions as to what could be used instead of needing 10 posts to post in development, then post your idea in here.
*If you're not sure why there is a limit to post in development, read the following thread - Postcount limit in developmental fora
*If you want to moan about the rule, don't post it anywhere on this site as we've heard it all before.
*Need to help someone in a development thread? Or give developer a logcat? Private Message them. It exists
*If you have less than 10 posts, don't post here UNLESS you are suggesting a different alternative.
*NOTE* As mods, senior mods and admins may be checking in here, don't use this thread to try and gain your first 10 posts because your comment will most likely be deleted.
While this is a great idea, the thread will be bombarded by those that want to raise their post count The larger issue wouild be with the spam to 10ers. The present method found by most new users.
What about 5 thanks rule? Instead of 10 posts get 5 thanks?
"The past is dead, it was all just a dream" - Magus (Chrono Trigger)
XxLordxX said:
What about 5 thanks rule? Instead of 10 posts get 5 thanks?
"The past is dead, it was all just a dream" - Magus (Chrono Trigger)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Only problem w 5 thanks is that not everyone hits the thanks button.
ronnie498 said:
Only problem w 5 thanks is that not everyone hits the thanks button.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So it will take some time to get permission to post in development section.In that time,we can hope they will get some perspective of xda-developers.
There is one huge drawback,that they might post some clever/funny things and get a lot of thanks for those posts.
So they can score 1 post and 10 thanks ->get permission to post in development section.:/
TonyStark said:
While this is a great idea, the thread will be bombarded by those that want to raise their post count The larger issue wouild be with the spam to 10ers. The present method found by most new users.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Most likely but we'll just report and move on
ronnie498 said:
Only problem w 5 thanks is that not everyone hits the thanks button.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is true. I think for a thanks count to work, people would need to be further educated about using the features available around this site. But at that point, would a limit oh development really be needed?
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk HD
KidCarter93 said:
Most likely but we'll just report and move on
This is true. I think for a thanks count to work, people would need to be further educated about using the features available around this site. But at that point, would a limit oh development really be needed?
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk HD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On the flip side you would have 10 thankers, just the opposite of a 10 posters that posting useless things
ronnie498 said:
On the flip side you would have 10 thankers, just the opposite of a 10 posters that posting useless things
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think that would happen to be honest. The only time we really see anything like that is when puppy accounts are thanking a main account. But then the accounts get banned anyway because of breaking the rules.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk HD
neectron said:
So it will take some time to get entry to development section.In that time,we can hope they will get some perspective of xda-developers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, they will have access, they simply can not post there until they reach the required min.
I'm not sure why this always tends to be an issue... I have always been one to send people to Q&A anyway. Q&A DOES NOT STAND for Quips and Assumptions
I was thinking something more along the lines of an open book type mini test. Have a Thread / Post with important information about being a forum member, the rules, and basic guidelines. Make it a requirement that they read said Post / Thread before posting in the development section. Then must answer 10 questions. Make the questions random, and revolving. So even if you have two people trying it next to each other, they will be different tests. But make sure the answers to the questions are in the Thread / Post. Also to keep it interesting make them have to use the search function ( which would be rigged to lead them back to the Post / Thread ) to answer at least half of the questions. Anyways just a thought.
TEAM MiK
MikROMs Since 3/13/11
I still don't understand why a new member absolutely needs post in a development thread.
- If there's a bug in a ROM/Kernel/Mod/etc, PM the developer. They're not going to sift through hundreds of pages to find your post.
- If you are a developer, help people in any other section of the site. It should be easy for you, since you are a developer.
- If you have a question, post in Q&A.
- If you want to say thanks, hit the Thanks button in the OP of the developer's thread.
It's really not a huge deal to get 10 posts. I don't know why people are complaining. Introduce yourself, post a screenshot of your homescreen, talk about your favorite device, show off your accessories, post in Offtopic. Do SOMETHING.
Ok folks, just to let you know, I have subscribed to this thread and will be looking with interest at any ideas posted. I will reply to the more serious suggestions and I will delete posts by those wishing to boost their post count
Ta
Rick
...........................
You can lead a fool to wisdom but you can't make him think! XDA, mobile wisdom, not a n00b feeding ground!!
I believe that we should do away with the ten post rule, since as earlier mentioned it is a piece of cake to reach ten posts.
Instead I propose a few alternatives, working on what has already been suggested:
1. Before allowing posts, ask the member a question about that topic itself, not just to check their overall developer knowledge.
2. Look for the number of helpful threads they have created AND have got positive feedback, not just their posts on other threads
3. Check for the spread of thanks,
i.e. differentiating a person with 100 likes from one funny post from someone with 2 likes or so over several posts.
This way we can judge a person's overall helpfulness to the community and whether they have something useful to contribute
Sent from my GT-I9100
If I helped you, please hit the thanks button!
ramnex said:
I believe that we should do away with the ten post rule, since as earlier mentioned it is a piece of cake to reach ten posts.
Instead I propose a few alternatives, working on what has already been suggested:
1. Before allowing posts, ask the member a question about that topic itself, not just to check their overall developer knowledge.
2. Look for the number of helpful threads they have created AND have got positive feedback, not just their posts on other threads
3. Check for the spread of thanks,
i.e. differentiating a person with 100 likes from one funny post from someone with 2 likes or so over several posts.
This way we can judge a person's overall helpfulness to the community and whether they have something useful to contribute
Sent from my GT-I9100
If I helped you, please hit the thanks button!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm tough this is tough. 1. I came to XDA w/ 0 developer knowledge. Still know very little. However I tend to use Q&A untill I feel comfortable enough to post in Development
2. My first helpful thread didn't come until I was here, well over a year.
Points are good, but as I've shown, many people are different.
neectron said:
There is one huge drawback,that they might post some clever/funny things and get a lot of thanks for those posts.
So they can score 1 post and 10 thanks -> entry to development section.:/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think this as a drawback...
Because, usually those who do use thanks button are educated enough or members with atleast 30 or more who knows that they are new users who are trying to be funny to get thanks..(this thinking comes if you have thanks count as restrictions for Dev section)
Also , the new user was able to get enough thanks(say ,10 thanks) from very less posts.. that would suggest he is clever enough to get it... so, it would also mean that the user is clever enough how to post in development section? I mean, if you know enough to get thanks from community which has been here all the time..
The drawbacks I see in this method are, 1. People already ask for thanks.. it would get into a point where people may beg for thanks and such threads may also appear as they used to appear in OT before thanks was taken down..
2. Also, puppy account count may rise, even though it will be taken down.. more work for admins thus..
3. I feel the complaints from new users will be more if this is the case.. as no one can't reach 10 thanks that easily... I mean I feel it would be atleast 20 posts for an avg user to get 10 thanks.. so, more whining..
I don't have a better answer as solution though.. but thanks limit could be really better than the 10 post rule IMO.. because this way the one word posters to get to 10 posts will be eliminated.. as well as spammers who try to get 10 posts as well.. all those link posting ban until 10 posts and other rules can be applied on this too.. so I feel this might be more efficient in keeping people from spamming... and inexperienced users will get enough idea and knowledge to post in development section instead of making a fool of themselves and getting flamed by others or something.. well, that's just my thoughts..
____________________________________
UltimaTIME Clock Widgets, 200 clock widgets in one!!
Falling Doesn’t Make You a Failure, Staying Down Does
KidCarter93 said:
I don't think that would happen to be honest. The only time we really see anything like that is when puppy accounts are thanking a main account. But then the accounts get banned anyway because of breaking the rules.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk HD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True but there are those that would try to work around it as you said, if there was a way around that then it is very possible that the thank count could work along with the post count that xxlordxx mentioned.
You have to remember, it simply isn't possible for us mods to read each post and approve it before it's allowed in Dev threads. Baring in mind we have 40k users per day and 2-3k new users per day
...........................
You can lead a fool to wisdom but you can't make him think! XDA, mobile wisdom, not a n00b feeding ground!!
Fallen Spartan said:
You have to remember, it simply isn't possible for us mods to read each post and approve it before it's allowed in Dev threads. Baring in mind we have 40k users per day and 2-3k new users per day
...........................
You can lead a fool to wisdom but you can't make him think! XDA, mobile wisdom, not a n00b feeding ground!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So very true
KidCarter93 said:
I don't think that would happen to be honest. The only time we really see anything like that is when puppy accounts are thanking a main account. But then the accounts get banned anyway because of breaking the rules.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk HD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Look at this: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2107187 and the stupid phone isn't even released yet and it isn't like the OP is thank you free either!
Ichigo said:
Do certain mods have more power than others? What is the ranking order of xda? And where do the portal writers come in? And I'd just have to assume the admins are above the mods and the forum administer is above them.
And then, of course, I'm at the very top, above the FA.
Edit: It appears @M_T_M has taken my post and made it into a thread. I shall not redact this post.
Sent from my Nexus 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The order goes like so: (least powerful at the top, most at the bottom)
Junior Member (less than 10 posts)
Member (more than 10 posts but less than 100 posts)
Senior Member (anything more than 100 posts)
RC, RT (people recognized for their theming work and/or contributions)
RD (people recognized for their development work)
Senior RD, Elite RD (higher up ranks of developers)
Forum Moderator (moderators who look over a specific section of the forum)
Senior Moderator (the next-up moderator rank, who moderate the entire site and other such things.)
Assistant Forum Administrator (self-explanatory, an example is @the_scotsman)
Forum Administrator (highest of the obtainable ranks, @bitpushr, @svetius and @MikeChannon are good examples)
The News Writer ranks don't fit into the list above - they're just ranks given to people who write the XDA news, whether they're a moderator or not.
There are also a number of RCs who have either applied for or been nominated for the "rank" of XDA Assist. You'll know who they are when you see that their rank is "Recognized Contributor" and there is a small blue tag underneath their rank that says "XDA ASSIST". An example of an XDA Assist RC is @R_a_z_v_a_n.
Hope this helps!
ИΘΘK¡€ said:
The order goes like so: (least powerful at the top, most at the bottom)
Junior Member (less than 10 posts)
Member (more than 10 posts but less than 100 posts)
Senior Member (anything more than 100 posts)
RC, RT (people recognized for their theming work and/or contributions)
RD (people recognized for their development work)
Senior RD, Elite RD (higher up ranks of developers)
Forum Moderator (moderators who look over a specific section of the forum)
Senior Moderator (the next-up moderator rank, who moderate the entire site and other such things.)
Assistant Forum Administrator (self-explanatory, an example is @the_scotsman)
Forum Administrator (highest of the obtainable ranks, @bitpushr and @svetius are good examples)
Forum Owner (this is @MikeChannon - he's actually a Forum Administrator, but he's the owner of XDA, too)
The News Writer ranks don't fit into the list above - they're just ranks given to people who write the XDA news, whether they're a moderator or not.
Hope this helps!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Close
Mike doesn't actually own XDA - he is the Forum Administrator, similar to a general manager type role.
the_scotsman said:
Close
Mike doesn't actually own XDA - he is the Forum Administrator, similar to a general manager type role.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oops.
Thanks for the tip, I've edited my previous post to correspond.
ИΘΘK¡€ said:
Oops.
Thanks for the tip, I've edited my previous post to correspond.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No worries
If you want to be anal, there's also the XDA Assist team
EDIT: We have a sort of structure here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lK5rP103OL3StU3q9iqwX9LU_k8XABeSQIAT3EHCqgM/pub
the_scotsman said:
No worries
If you want to be anal, there's also the XDA Assist team
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, temporarily forgot about those guys since they're not a separate rank.
Adding now!
Ichigo said:
Do certain mods have more power than others? What is the ranking order of xda? And where do the portal writers come in? And I'd just have to assume the admins are above the mods and the forum administer is above them.
And then, of course, I'm at the very top, above the FA.
Edit: It appears @M_T_M has taken my post and made it into a thread. I shall not redact this post. ?
Sent from my Nexus 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Gathering intel before commencing your attack. A wise decision.
ИΘΘK¡€ said:
...................
Forum Administrator (highest of the obtainable ranks, bitpushr, svetius and MikeChannon are good examples)....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Somebody mention my name
Just a bit of clarification to your helpful post for the line above:
Svetius is the User Experience Admin with a broad set of site-wide control and responsibilities.
bitpushr is an Admin with key responsibilities for keeping the technical side of the website up and running smoothly.
MikeChannon Forum Admin general admin and oversees the Moderation side.
XDA-Devs is not owned by me, see Wikipedia
Mike
MikeChannon said:
Somebody mention my name
Just a bit of clarification to your helpful post for the line above:
Svetius is the User Experience Admin with a broad set of site-wide control and responsibilities.
bitpushr is an Admin with key responsibilities for keeping the technical side of the website up and running smoothly.
MikeChannon Forum Admin general admin and oversees the Moderation side.
XDA-Devs is not owned by me, see Wikipedia
Mike
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh hi, can you change my name to MikeÇhannon please?
Tezlastorme said:
Oh hi, can you change my name to MikeÇhannon please?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Despite the curious letter Ç the answer would have to be no siree Bob:laugh:
Mike
mikechannon said:
despite the curious letter ç the answer would have to be no siree bob[emoji23]
mike
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
??
Ichigo said:
Would you be willing to promote me from Senior Member to Pokemon Master or Master Troll?
If not, I suppose I'll settle for Elite Admin.
Thanks in advanced.
Oh, also, thanks for changing my username so many times. You might as well go ahead and give we the ability to change my username myself as well.
Sent from my Nexus 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The last one actually sounds like it would save him a lot of trouble. ?
MikeChannon said:
Somebody mention my name
Just a bit of clarification to your helpful post for the line above:
Svetius is the User Experience Admin with a broad set of site-wide control and responsibilities.
bitpushr is an Admin with key responsibilities for keeping the technical side of the website up and running smoothly.
MikeChannon Forum Admin general admin and oversees the Moderation side.
XDA-Devs is not owned by me, see Wikipedia
Mike
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh my goodness, am I actually talking to the MikeChannon?
Thank you, kind sir, for your specification and input. I am aware that svetius is the User Experience Admin, bitpushr is the XDA Technical Admin, and you're, well, the Forum Admin. I just put you three in one rank to conserve space and whatnot.
Thank you for the Wikipedia link - I can now see that Joshua Solan is the actual owner of XDA.
Wow, what an eventful day at XDA - I've finally reached the momentous 1,000 post thank marker and had a conversation with the great MikeChannon! :laugh:
Ichigo said:
Would you be willing to promote me from Senior Member to Pokemon Master or Master Troll?
If not, I suppose I'll settle for Elite Admin.
Thanks in advanced.
Oh, also, thanks for changing my username so many times. You might as well go ahead and give we the ability to change my username myself as well.
Sent from my Nexus 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha .... if anyone gets Elite Admin it'll be meeeee
Tezlastorme said:
The last one actually sounds like it would save him a lot of trouble. ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Save me a lot of trouble... we don't care about him ... right
ИΘΘK¡€ said:
Oh my goodness, am I actually talking to the MikeChannon?
Thank you, kind sir, for your specification and input. I am aware that svetius is the User Experience Admin, bitpushr is the XDA Technical Admin, and you're, well, the Forum Admin. I just put you three in one rank to conserve space and whatnot.
Thank you for the Wikipedia link - I can now see that Joshua Solan is the actual owner of XDA.
Wow, what an eventful day at XDA - I've finally reached the momentous 1,000 post thank marker and had a conversation with the great MikeChannon! :laugh:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh now that's such a shame. You're going to have to stop posting or else it'll ruin that nice round 1000 posts
Mike
MikeChannon said:
Oh now that's such a shame. You're going to have to stop posting or else it'll ruin that nice round 1000 posts
Mike
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Better ban him before it's too late ?
Ichigo said:
1001 now! (Sorry [emoji14])
One day I'll become Elite Admin! That'll show you.
Sent from my Nexus 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It actually says 1334 for me ?
Edit: oh
@MikeChannon, I could either stop posting, or I could take a screenshot. Sorry it's a bit bugged.
@Ichigo, you little...
Just kidding, actually. 1,001 is the number at which the meter goes up to 6 bars, so yay!
@Tezlastorme, I'm talking about the Thanks Meter, you're talking about my post count. Two separate items.
ИΘΘK¡€ said:
@MikeChannon, I could either stop posting, or I could take a screenshot. [emoji14] Sorry it's a bit bugged.
@Ichigo, you little...
Just kidding, actually. 1,001 is the number at which the meter goes up to 6 bars, so yay!
@Tezlastorme, I'm talking about the Thanks Meter, you're talking about my post count. Two separate items.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You said post thanks!
No one says post thanks!
Tezlastorme said:
You said post thanks!
No one says post thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That right?
I didn't realize that - wow, I feel like such a noob.
So, do we call them "thanks", with out the "post"?
@Ichigo, congratulations, sir.
ichigo said:
not sure why i'm posting this here, or even saying this, but i have 964 post thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
....
i have 964 post thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
...
964 post thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
..
post thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
?
Ichigo said:
Do certain mods have more power than others? What is the ranking order of xda? And where do the portal writers come in? And I'd just have to assume the admins are above the mods and the forum administer is above them.
And then, of course, I'm at the very top, above the FA.
Edit: It appears @M_T_M has taken my post and made it into a thread. I shall not redact this post. ?
Sent from my Nexus 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Powers, who needs Powers....when you have "The Law"
MikeChannon said:
Somebody mention my name
Just a bit of clarification to your helpful post for the line above:
Svetius is the User Experience Admin with a broad set of site-wide control and responsibilities.
bitpushr is an Admin with key responsibilities for keeping the technical side of the website up and running smoothly.
MikeChannon Forum Admin general admin and oversees the Moderation side.
XDA-Devs is not owned by me, see Wikipedia
Mike
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Magic Mike always "in the House" :laugh:
Ichigo said:
Would you be willing to promote me from Senior Member to Pokemon Master or Master Troll?
If not, I suppose I'll settle for Elite Admin.
Thanks in advanced.
Oh, also, thanks for changing my username so many times. You might as well go ahead and give we the ability to change my username myself as well.
Sent from my Nexus 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can't change your title, but I can change your status.....to...."Account Disabled" :silly:
ИΘΘK¡€ said:
The order goes like so: (least powerful at the top, most at the bottom)
Junior Member (less than 10 posts)
Member (more than 10 posts but less than 100 posts)
Senior Member (anything more than 100 posts)
RC, RT (people recognized for their theming work and/or contributions)
RD (people recognized for their development work)
Senior RD, Elite RD (higher up ranks of developers)
Forum Moderator (the lowest moderator rank)
Senior Moderator (the next-up moderator rank, given to Forum Moderators who have been a member for a good while and do a good job moderating)
Assistant Forum Administrator (self-explanatory, an example is @the_scotsman)
Forum Administrator (highest of the obtainable ranks, @bitpushr, @svetius and @MikeChannon are good examples)
The News Writer ranks don't fit into the list above - they're just ranks given to people who write the XDA news, whether they're a moderator or not.
There are also a number of RCs who have either applied for or been nominated for the "rank" of XDA Assist. You'll know who they are when you see that their rank is "Recognized Contributor" and there is a small blue tag underneath their rank that says "XDA ASSIST". An example of an XDA Assist RC is @R_a_z_v_a_n.
Hope this helps!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good Job, you almost got them all and almost got them correct.