Develop Bugs

Ice cream sandwich

Does anyone know if cm9 will officially support wildfire?
Sent from my HTC Wildfire using Tapatalk

No, not yet!
Sent from my HTC Wildfire using xda premium

nope i don't hope so

nemo4 said:
nope i don't hope so
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What a stupid thing to say??
Why do you hope we don't get it??
Sent from my HTC Wildfire using xda premium

Status Update
http://www.cyanogenmod.com/blog/cm9-progress-update
The OG Motorola Droid (TI OMAP 3430 600MHz CPU, PowerVR SGX530 GPU, 256MB RAM) is officially not on the build list of CM9. Chipsets mentioned only go upto the QSD8250 SnapDragon found on the Desire and above. Even MSM7227 (600/800MHz CPU) with the Adreno 200 GPU is not listed so far.

Yeah, I didn't expect it to happen either. At least now we don't have to worry about whether we have the latest cm version

Even if we don't get cm9 we will get ics considering the G1 has ics port...
Sent from my HTC Wildfire using xda premium

I think this month we get cm9.

kaassaus said:
I think this month we get cm9.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
[Sarcasm]Woohooo........... then we get your new rom?[Sarcasm]

Has anybody converted his Arc to Arc S ??

Has anybody converted his Arc to Arc S ??
Wotanserver says you can flash an Arc S firmware to and Arc phone, but I have not tested it yet. Has anybody had the guts to try ??
Also, and as long as I understand (please correct me if I'm wrong), the only difference between the Arc and Arc S is firmware (same chip, just overclocked)

Arc S has different processor.
Sent from my Xperia Arc

Retrosid said:
Arc S has different processor.
Sent from my Xperia Arc
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Arc: 32bit Qualcomm Snapdragon MSM8255
Arc S: 32bit Qualcomm Snapdragon MSM8255T
source: pdadb.net
I'm gonna dig deeper into that "T" difference

if im not mistaken the only difference are their clock speed.

Is that really a difference?

Just flash Arc firmware on Arc, oc to 1.4GHz and voila --> Arc @ Arc S
Sent from my iPad 2 using Tapatalk

chip and processor is difference.

electrash said:
chip and processor is difference.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Other than the overclocked chip, no

14.4Mbit/s antenna in the Arc S is a difference
Sent from my LT15i using XDA Premium App

Arc:
Chipset Qualcomm MSM8255 Snapdragon
CPU 1 GHz Scorpion
GPU Adreno 205
Arc s:
Chipset Qualcomm MSM8255T Snapdragon
CPU 1.4 GHz Scorpion
GPU Adreno 205

gtrab said:
I'm gonna dig deeper into that "T" difference
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It just means that it's been "factory overclocked", tested extensively in higher frequencies.

iridaki said:
It just means that it's been "factory overclocked", tested extensively in higher frequencies.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It just means that the se devs have been following Dooms kernel work...
sinkster©

gtrab said:
Has anybody converted his Arc to Arc S ??
Wotanserver says you can flash an Arc S firmware to and Arc phone, but I have not tested it yet. Has anybody had the guts to try ??
Also, and as long as I understand (please correct me if I'm wrong), the only difference between the Arc and Arc S is firmware (same chip, just overclocked)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hi
a lot's of people does not understand your question......
can The ARC-s bsband (Kernel , etc) flashed to an ARC to use (cheat) the ARC hardware for ARC S ?
i think this can be reality - BUt maybe nobody have flashed the arc S FW to and ARC to try it. ?!?!?

Arc with Arc S kernel will still boot @ 1GHz
Just use Doom's kernel and oc it, best and easiest way.
I know that the Arc S has the same CPU as Arc, just tested at higher frequencies, but why can almost every Arc S run stable @ 2GHz and just a few Arc?
Sent from my iPad 2 using Tapatalk

sinkster said:
It just means that the se devs have been following Dooms kernel work...
sinkster©
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not really, but... ok!

they have different touchscreen and display drivers. the partitions of ROM are different. so you probably cannot flash ftf bundle for arc s on arc. get prerooted arc s stock rom zip and put it on arc. take oc kernel fron doom, patch up the baseband too if you want.
Sent from my X10i using XDA App

tiborprogmed said:
hi
a lot's of people does not understand your question......
can The ARC-s bsband (Kernel , etc) flashed to an ARC to use (cheat) the ARC hardware for ARC S ?
i think this can be reality - BUt maybe nobody have flashed the arc S FW to and ARC to try it. ?!?!?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you got it right
wotanserver says "it can be done"

gtrab said:
you got it right
wotanserver says "it can be done"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i tried but i got a damaged BQ

Flo95 said:
14.4Mbit/s antenna in the Arc S is a difference
Sent from my LT15i using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i didn't find that info at SE's site.
source please...
championswimmer said:
they have different touchscreen and display drivers. the partitions of ROM are different.
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
arc s and arc user interface and camera app looks the same to me.
source please...
Flo95 said:
I know that the Arc S has the same CPU as Arc, just tested at higher frequencies, but why can almost every Arc S run stable @ 2GHz and just a few Arc?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i think the "T" in the cpu name means that arc s cpu is an upgraded version of the arc cpu. they must have add something on the hardware, not just overclocked by software. that's why it's more stable at higher clock (2GHz).
besides the cpu, everything looks the same to me

se dev relations manager "kalle d" said on the ics alpha thread that arc and arc s have diff partition tables and diff display drivers.
Sent from my X10i using XDA App

Archos 101 G9 different versions

Hey guys,
I'm a bit confused. I want to purchase an Archos 101 G9 tablet but I found many different specs or maybe just wrong.
So maybe you can help me out here. I already searched this board but couldn't find exactly my misery, but maybe only because no one else had?
I found versions with 1.0, 1,2 and 1.5GHz CPUs as well as with different RAM configurations - 512MB and 1024MB.
Of course, I would like to have the 1.5GHz and 1024MB version. Are the different offers really different devices or is it like the 1.5GHz CPU just stepped down to 1.2?
Also, I red somewhere that the 1024MB are always build in, but just 512MB are available to use with HC, but the full 1024MB are available with ICS.
So, maybe you can give me some details on this topic and/or some tips what to look at when buying.
Thanks in advance,
SilverstarX

Hey guys,
I'm a bit confused. I want to purchase an Archos 101 G9 tablet but I found many different specs or maybe just wrong.
So maybe you can help me out here. I already searched this board but couldn't find exactly my misery, but maybe only because no one else had?
I found versions with 1.0, 1,2 and 1.5GHz CPUs as well as with different RAM configurations - 512MB and 1024MB.
Of course, I would like to have the 1.5GHz and 1024MB version. Are the different offers really different devices or is it like the 1.5GHz CPU just stepped down to 1.2?
Also, I red somewhere that the 1024MB are always build in, but just 512MB are available to use with HC, but the full 1024MB are available with ICS.
So, maybe you can give me some details on this topic and/or some tips what to look at when buying.
Thanks in advance,
SilverstarX
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Get turbo edition (the one with 1.5ghz and 1gb ram). It has small sticker in front side, right bottom corner saying turbo. They are mostly the same. Only cpu and ram differences AFAIK. They have same custom and official roms, so you can upgrade any of them to ics. I hope this answers to your question.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda-developers premium HD app

julle131 said:
Get turbo edition (the one with 1.5ghz and 1gb ram). It has small sticker in front side, right bottom corner saying turbo. They are mostly the same. Only cpu and ram differences AFAIK. They have same custom and official roms, so you can upgrade any of them to ics. I hope this answers to your question.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda-developers premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey julle131,
thanks for your answer. I would prefer to buy the tablet online, so looking on the front would be a problem.
Also, I found "turbo" versions with 1.2GHz, too. That is what I meant confusing. So either the given details are wrong or there are different versions... thats why I'm asking here.
Sincerly
SilverstarX

SilverstarX said:
Hey julle131,
thanks for your answer. I would prefer to buy the tablet online, so looking on the front would be a problem.
Also, I found "turbo" versions with 1.2GHz, too. That is what I meant confusing. So either the given details are wrong or there are different versions... thats why I'm asking here.
Sincerly
SilverstarX
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do they have picture of package? Just look for 1.5ghz processor and 1gb ram. Its more expensive. All of them should be upgradeable to ics, if they really are g9.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda-developers premium HD app

julle131 said:
Do they have picture of package? Just look for 1.5ghz processor and 1gb ram. Its more expensive. All of them should be upgradeable to ics, if they really are g9.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda-developers premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, but you don't understand my question. I want know if the 1.5 ghz cpu is stepped down to 1.2 ghz, because the Archos 101 G9 Turbo 250 GB is often descriped with 1.2 Ghz. I thought maybe Archos build in an 1.5 ghz cpu and regulate it on 1.2 ghz...

yes the first "turbo" is on 1.2 Ghz

cajl said:
yes the first "turbo" is on 1.2 Ghz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is what? Limited down 1.2 Ghz or is it really a different chipset/cpu?

The 1.2 GHz version is the same CPU as the 1 GHz version. The 1.5 GHz is the omap 4460 and the 1.0 and 1.2 is the omap 4430
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app

MACBLACK91 said:
The 1.2 GHz version is the same CPU as the 1 GHz version. The 1.5 GHz is the omap 4460 and the 1.0 and 1.2 is the omap 4430
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bit confused because in about tablet it says omap 4460 ES1.1 but benchmarks say 1.2 CPU
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2

Archos made a bad mistake with their different versions.
They have:
Normal 4430 @ 1.0
Turbo 4430 @ 1.2
Turbo 4460 @ 1.2
Turbo 4460 @ 1.5
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2

One x vs s3 benchmark

Hi .. i just wanna share some great news with u guys
Finally .. our htc one x (new updated) running 4.0.4, sense 4.1 (international version) have higher scores than galaxy s3 on quadrant benchmark !!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QRLGawjmC5E&feature=youtube_gdata_player
And here is the video shows that one x less lags on video recording than s3 after updated !!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c9LKzql7WoE&feature=youtube_gdata_player
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium

To be honest that don't say much. The GSIII is smoother and more powerful.
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium

Every time someone starts a thread referring to the S3 god punches a kitten in the balls.
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium

MaBlo said:
To be honest that don't say much. The GSIII is smoother and more powerful.
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But dont have sense, thats sad.
Htc One X Venom ViperX Rom + faux123 s kernel + Rezound Mod

This makes me happy :')
Sent from my now amazing HTC One X thanks to TeamVenoms ViperX rom

MaBlo said:
To be honest that don't say much. The GSIII is smoother and more powerful.
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Smoother maybe. More powerful , how exactly ?

The GPU in the exynos processor has more power than the tegra. As it uses a smaller architecture.

MaBlo said:
To be honest that don't say much. The GSIII is smoother and more powerful.
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Neither does stating that. Honestly there is no exact proof that either is noticeably faster. Both phones are 1.4/5 GHz quad-core devices. Yes the S3 has more RAM and a faster GPU but 2GB of memory isn't needed for this type of android device and it actually doesn't make it faster. Unlike the S3 gpu the tegra 3 has built in ram for the GPU (S3 uses integrated ram)
. The HOX also has a 5th deep sleep core and if you have seen the sense 4.1 deep sleep you will be amazed.
I could see the HOX have better benchmarks than the S3 but that doesn't mean it's faster or better. The devices are too different yet equal to compare and choose which one is better.
Sent from my HTC One X using xda app-developers app

Tw1tchy said:
Neither does stating that. Honestly there is no exact proof that either is noticeably faster. Both phones are 1.4/5 GHz quad-core devices. Yes the S3 has more RAM and a faster GPU but 2GB of memory isn't needed for this type of android device and it actually doesn't make it faster. Unlike the S3 gpu the tegra 3 has built in ram for the GPU (S3 uses integrated ram)
. The HOX also has a 5th deep sleep core and if you have seen the sense 4.1 deep sleep you will be amazed.
I could see the HOX have better benchmarks than the S3 but that doesn't mean it's faster or better. The devices are too different yet equal to compare and choose which one is better.
Sent from my HTC One X using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What a great argument. But I thought the s3 has 1gb ram like us?
Sent from my now amazing HTC One X thanks to TeamVenoms ViperX rom

I dont really get people's obsession w benchmark scores and specs. They dont mean anything if the software is buggy, the battery sucks, the multitasking is messed up, the screen flickers, the reception fades away.
---------- Post added at 11:32 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:31 AM ----------
smidgeox said:
What a great argument. But I thought the s3 has 1gb ram like us?
Sent from my now amazing HTC One X thanks to TeamVenoms ViperX rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the US, korean ( and I think Japanese too) SGS3 have 2GB of RAM.

averygagaanroid said:
I dont really get people's obsession w benchmark scores and specs. They dont mean anything if the software is buggy, the battery sucks, the multitasking is messed up, the screen flickers, the reception fades away.
---------- Post added at 11:32 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:31 AM ----------
the US, korean ( and I think Japanese too) SGS3 have 2GB of RAM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh right thank you, I was confused then.
Also to contradict your point all of the problems you mentioned but the multitasking have all been ironed out? So? Yeah bench marks mean quite a lot.
I love my everything about my phone atm haha.
Sent from my now amazing HTC One X thanks to TeamVenoms ViperX rom

Another thread for HOX vs GS3.....
1st of all, welcome aboard to Android 4.0.4.
Higher benchmark is nice though is not important.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app

Arsaw said:
Another thread for HOX vs GS3.....
1st of all, welcome aboard to Android 4.0.4.
Higher benchmark is nice though is not important.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
butt isnt the S3 all about benchmarks? the Mali400 is the only reason why the s3 ever gets better benchmarks even though the A9's are clocked slower, quad clocks are the same. The Mali400 is a great gpu but it uses integrated memory and the only reason i would ever say the Tegra 3 is better than the Exynos 4412 is because it has a dedicated GPU and a 5th idle core...... though i can only imagine samsung having a quadcore device with a dedicated gpu and a 5th companion core (nexus device hehehe).

Dont forget to tell that our oc is for daily use, not only to do a great benchmark and then go back to stock kernel.
Htc One X Venom ViperX Rom + faux123 s kernel + Rezound Mod

Tw1tchy said:
butt isnt the S3 all about benchmarks? the Mali400 is the only reason why the s3 ever gets better benchmarks even though the A9's are clocked slower, quad clocks are the same. The Mali400 is a great gpu but it uses integrated memory and the only reason i would ever say the Tegra 3 is better than the Exynos 4412 is because it has a dedicated GPU and a 5th idle core...... though i can only imagine samsung having a quadcore device with a dedicated gpu and a 5th companion core (nexus device hehehe).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nah... GS3 is not just about benchmark. That was GS2. This time, GS3 is about features, nature UX and of course 1st phone designed for human
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app

Arsaw said:
Nah... GS3 is not just about benchmark. That was GS2. This time, GS3 is about features, nature UX and of course 1st phone designed for human
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep, and an adv for teens and girls.
Htc One X Venom ViperX Rom + faux123 s kernel + Rezound Mod

So because stock HOX scores higher benchmarks on both Antutu & Quadrant, Samsung users don't like those boasting tools anymore?
If only the HOX had the better screen, design and camera too..... LOL
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2

dragonesdenano said:
But dont have sense, thats sad.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMddJjaF_bo&feature=plcp

manu1991 said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMddJjaF_bo&feature=plcp
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So a fake chinesse copy of a sg3 is consider as an original Samsung ?
Nice try
Htc One X Venom ViperX Rom + faux123 s kernel + Rezound Mod

Mine got 5912 on stock rom, no tweaks or anything, just root. Havent seen any stock SGS3 reach that score yet. All the HOX needed is proper optimizations for its SoC like samsung has to prove it can match and even beat its flagship in some areas
So, better screen, better camera, beats, better ui (imo) faster updates due to htc's track record vs sammy, more mainstream SoC for better game support and general compatibity for the future due to N7 using the same chip. Do we really have to feel threatened by the SG3? Its a hype machine just like the fruit phone
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2

[Q] Gingerbread ROM for One V?

Can Anyone port a GB 2.3.6 ROM and Kernel to One V?
Well here are some reasons why GB rom is suitable:
1. Its not resource hog. The system does not require any advanced hardware(JB and ICS does). Thus for the 2 year old hardware it can give very high performance.
2. For Gamers: Phones with similar hardware as One V running GB (Ex: Xperia Neo V) runs GTA 3, Vice City, Temple run 2, Subway Surf Without any kind of LAG!! Thats right no LAG while playing GTA 3. (Neo V lags if updated to ICS so all the Older Xperia people are downgrading to GB.)
3. Battery life : It has slightly more battery life.
Disadvantages:
1. Some apps on play Store require ICS and JB.
Since the hardware on One V is too Old with single core processor and 512mb of ram the Older software such as Gingerbread is suitable.
So anyone with idea of Porting? ROM can be ported but "Kernel"?

It could probably be ported from the Desire S if someone was up to it. Ironic how I was thinking of this earlier.

What about the Kernel?

Nobody is gonna do the kernel
Sent from my One V using xda app-developers app

mr_nooby said:
Nobody is gonna do the kernel
Sent from my One V using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well thats Sad