Dear Dev and ordinary mortals , I decided make new thread for testing roms, kernel...
Many developers saying that their ROMs are the fastest and most stable, but I decided that one thread specifically for the test results.
The rule is simple, send me a PM in your test results.
In PM, send "Rom name (Sense, AOSP, or CM) and version. And of course the kernel and kernel version.'ll Publish the results by category, for example ARHD 21.0 release will result with the highest and lowest score.
The rule for testing:
- Have HOX
- Program to test: AnTuTu
- Scrrenshot "Scores" and screenshot "Check scores"
- Battery 40-50%
- Unplug charger
- Closed all "Recent apps"
- Turn off, Wifi, BT,Data, GPS
Alea iacta est
please moderators do not gai theme, because this place is widely read, let everyone see, that little compete
res
res2
res 3
res4
i have one thing to say
benchmark apps say nothing... especially AnTuTu
and devs can fake the benchmark score's
the only thing that people can write here ,is what they think of the rom (fast ,not fast ,battery life ,stable ,not stable ,and so on)
but it is also a thing how you install and setup the rom
there are devs here that build roms for a long time ,and everybody using it ,but that would not say that it be the fastest or stable rom on a one x threat
Dont want to be rude but i thought that comparsion is not good idea
just flash Rom u want to find out which is most suitable with u
each Rom has it own impressive part then let user choose
best regard
windylawyer.1712 said:
Dont want to be rude but i thought that comparsion is not good idea
just flash Rom u want to find out which is most suitable with u
each Rom has it own impressive part then let user choose
best regard
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
people I thing, what number say
windylawyer.1712 said:
Dont want to be rude but i thought that comparsion is not good idea
just flash Rom u want to find out which is most suitable with u
each Rom has it own impressive part then let user choose
best regard
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Plus, comparison "which ROM is better" threads, are not permitted under forum rules I believe.
Try them for yourself. There's almost no limit to the number of times you can flash and reflash your device until you're satisfied.
Benchmarks are completely useless. Scores are fiddled and cherry-picked. My HIGHLY customized HOX is worse than the stock HOX in nearly every department and nearly every single benchmark...but you put them side-by-side and USE them (and I have) and it literally devastates the stock setup despite almost every score saying it should be otherwise.
Comparing one ROM with another with their wide variability in particular setup from the developer, compounded by various kernel versions, repacked, not, set up this way and that...it's comparing apples to oranges to pears.
Pointless.
U know i think if we would say that the only benchmark program would be epic citadel or the fps in a game this thread would be awsm.
The benchmark situation is all f up but if we could find and use the right tools....
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
---------- Post added at 06:37 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:29 PM ----------
And still there are other points to consider not only benches. Like is it smooth, does it crash, which kernel is the best, how is the batt life and so on
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
and313 said:
U know i think if we would say that the only benchmark program would be epic citadel or the fps in a game this thread would be awsm.
The benchmark situation is all f up but if we could find and use the right tools....
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
---------- Post added at 06:37 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:29 PM ----------
And still there are other points to consider not only benches. Like is it smooth, does it crash, which kernel is the best, how is the batt life and so on
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And therein lies the problem.
I will offer a comparison. I have two good friends who are members of teams whose sole purpose is to compete for the highest 3DMark score on the PC.
The machines they construct and set up simply ANNIHILATE by orders of magnitude my own in these benchmarks. They achieve numbers that are simply stunning.
However...those same machines cannot be booted and running for more than 10 minutes at a time without literally beginning to slag themselves.
They can reach FPS numbers in game benchmarks that are out of this world...but they absolutely cannot play a game.
Benchmarks and their scores have NO bearing whatsoever on real world usage. And chasing those numbers is utterly, totally pointless.
sebastiaan15 said:
+1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1000000
Tigerlight said:
And therein lies the problem.
I will offer a comparison. I have two good friends who are members of teams whose sole purpose is to compete for the highest 3DMark score on the PC.
The machines they construct and set up simply ANNIHILATE by orders of magnitude my own in these benchmarks. They achieve numbers that are simply stunning.
However...those same machines cannot be booted and running for more than 10 minutes at a time without literally beginning to slag themselves.
They can reach FPS numbers in game benchmarks that are out of this world...but they absolutely cannot play a game.
Benchmarks and their scores have NO bearing whatsoever on real world usage. And chasing those numbers is utterly, totally pointless.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have done a lot of benchmark testing and i think i know 1 or 2 things about it. See you are talking only about how corrupt the benchmark system is and you did not even address the other points i mentioned and and thats why the thread should be closed? What about game benchmarking? And i think there are no rules about not being able to compare roms...
Back to the benches. For me the most accurate program is epic citadel. I know there are also other benches but they are not so accurate. Epic citadel is plain and simple its score is generated by fps only. And thats why is the most accurate. Thats why a nexus phone is faster in it without a problem.. because its faster. So please rather then saying its pointless try to think of a solution.
We allready know how pointless some benches are...
Also its hard for me to believe that some dev is gonna optimize his rom for a specific game or bench in our community. Its not so black and white as u might think
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
Reported as comparison threads are not allowed
exocetdj said:
Reported as comparison threads are not allowed
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well tnx for that. So i guess thread closed. Damn rules
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
and313 said:
Well tnx for that. So i guess thread closed. Damn rules
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Past experience says that this would probably end up as a flame war mate. I like the concept of it but there are rules for that reason
exocetdj said:
Past experience says that this would probably end up as a flame war mate. I like the concept of it but there are rules for that reason
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah i think if you would think it through good to eliminate the not so well litten factor this thread would actually have a chance. But big brother does not care
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
and313 said:
Yeah i think if you would think it through good to eliminate the not so well litten factor this thread would actually have a chance. But big brother does not care
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True!
Thread closed
For many of the mentioned reasons we do not want any comparison threads here.
Additionally the experience a user has with a rom is far more than a stupid benchmark result.
Related
Hello. I have flashed the Synergy kernel for CM7 and I have CyanogenMod Self-Kang. I am overclocked to 1.8Ghz and have the lag free governor. Why is it that when I run a benchmark I get such low results? Take a look:
I've seen people getting around 5000 on this device! Is there a reason why it is under 4000?
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Edit: OK thanks. I am not going to post anymore and I encourage other people not to (by not post I mean in this "Why is this" forum. I'm sorry I posted in the wrong place...
first, wrong forum. Should put this in Q&A
second, Quadrant results means nothing, my phone is giving me 3k and it doesn't lag what so ever.
I've never hit 5000 with my phone I'm always in between 3000-4400. Plus benchmark scores mean nothing. Even if the device is not hardware accelerated it will still be lag free. Not to mention this post should of been in the "General" section. It is not about development. Re-post your question in General, you might get more answers.
Yo just because 1 person got away with posting in the wrong forum yesterday does not mean you can ask questions here. This is why we have different sections in the first place. Follow the rules of the forum and do your research because if you did you would have found out that quadrant means nothing.
_Thursday
STOP USING QUADRANT!!!
Use a program that has been updated like Antutu.
Quadrant has not been updated in over a year. Let it die for the sake of human kind.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using XDA App
Quadrant really doesn't do a very good job of true benchmarking, and it's WAY too easy to fool it. Some very simple hacks can be done to artificially increase the score by a large amount. For example:
1. enabling stagefright by default in the build.prop can do this (on some stock roms.) This will make it so the h.264 encoding test will be falsely inflated.
2. Tricking the system into using a ramdisk for it's IO test instead of the actual nand. This one should be self explanitory.
3. On the old galaxy phones, that used rfs for the filesystem, if converted to EXT4 it would give a HUGE boost, but no real world performance difference. (Quandrant doesn't seem to read rfs correctly.)
And believe me, there are PLENTY of others. No to mention its not optimized for more than one core.
Benchmarks mean nothing. Real world usability does, unless it's just an e-peen thing, my benchmarks are better than yours type of thing. It's kind of like overclocking. I've NEVER seen the point in it (on a cell phone, not a pc.) You end up taking a risk of greatly reducing the lifespan of your cpu for 2-3 extra frames a second in games, drain more battery power, and again, in real world use you won't see a difference at all.
If you're trying to show off to others how cool your phone is, instead of showing them quad scores that mean nothing, why not let them USE it for a few minutes? That's what sold me on this phone when I bought it, using someone's for about 15 minutes
It could have been he was using performance governor and cleared out his ram. That would cause a height quadrant score.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
On the stock kernal with the ViperX rom.
I got 12500.
Now with faux kernal I get like 9000.
Why?
I have a MUCH lower CPU score in benchmarks...
Geez you already asked this, why another identical thread? Benchmark means nothing, case closed.
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
yeah what is everyones obsession with benchmarks its just a number..
Benchmarks just a number? Tell that to people who drive race cars.
0-60 in 3 seconds is still better performance than 0-60 in 3.5 seconds. If both cars have the same engine, same gearing and weigh the same, then something else must determine why one is slower than the other.
Same way with our phones. Benchmark tests, especially AnTuTu, do offer insights into the performance of our machines. So, instead of giving the snarky answer that 'benchmarks don't matter', just say you have no idea or don't post at all.
yes maybe numbers are more applicable to cars. but this is a mobile phone forum not a car forum.....
the benchmarks mean sod all. the actual experience of using the phone is what matters.
benchmarks can vary from the slightest differences in environment, so yeah it is just a number, and will change for almost anything..
lawrence750 said:
yes maybe numbers are more applicable to cars. but this is a mobile phone forum not a car forum.....
the benchmarks mean sod all. the actual experience of using the phone is what matters.
benchmarks can vary from the slightest differences in environment. they mean absolutely sod all.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really? A Mobile Phone Forum? How did I miss that part??
Sure experience matters, but to a lot of people, so do numbers. And 3000 points would make a difference, both numerically and perceptually.
I think this thread should be closed and open a new one talking about 10b5.
Enviado desde mi HTC One X usando Tapatalk 2
Baldilocks said:
Sure experience matters, but to a lot of people, so do numbers. And 3000 points would make a difference, both numerically and perceptually.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well seeing as the benchmarks can change literally from one minute to the next, and the fact they aren't that consistent, that essentially proves that the numbers don't mean as much as everyone makes out.
And therefore instead of basing how good your phone is operating on benchmark scores, just judge it on the actual performance of flicking through screens, loading apps , playing games etc etc - if there isn't a problem there, which i bet in the OPs case, there isn't any general performance issues, just a lower score. if there isn't any actual performance issues, then what the hell is the problem?
Hold on everyone. Small fluctuations in benchmark scores are nothing but a consistent drop of 25% is more meaningful, especially if all that changed was the kernel.
Why does everyone on here seem to just repeat what they read last week only with attitude added and regardless of factors such as severity.
To the OP... might be an idea to go back to stock and run several benchmarks to get a good overall picture. Note all the different scores for different tests (CPU, GPU, memory etc). Flash this kernel again and run several benchmarks. See which tests are affected and report your findings to Faux.
lawrence750 said:
well seeing as the benchmarks can change literally from one minute to the next, and the fact they aren't that consistent, that essentially proves that the numbers don't mean as much as everyone makes out.
And therefore instead of basing how good your phone is operating on benchmark scores, just judge it on the actual performance of flicking through screens, loading apps , playing games etc etc - if there isn't a problem there, which i bet in the OPs case, there isn't any general performance issues, just a lower score. if there isn't any actual performance issues, then what the hell is the problem?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Numbers shouldn't be inconsistent. My scores fall within 0.5-1% of each other every time I run them.
Certain ROMs can have a major impact on performance. Just like going to 4.0.4 and Sense 4.1 made a huge positive performance difference. Guess what, you could actually see that difference with 'useless' benchmark tests too.
Op,
Did you cry? Did your heart feel broken? I've heard benchmark scores are everything, they define smartphones these days.
ben-fisher-bro said:
On the stock kernal with the ViperX rom.
I got 12500.
Now with faux kernal I get like 9000.
Why?
I have a MUCH lower CPU score in benchmarks...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I found a fix for you! Just read this post here! http://forum.xda-developers.com/announcement.php?a=81
Sent from my HTC One X using xda app-developers app
I eventually ran a benchmark on my CarbonROM install on my Sprint Galaxy Nexus, clocked at a max of 1.6
But, I saw that my device compared to others is just super super low, I don't have the numbers on me as I don't have my phone, but if you're one of those people who have a high benchmark score, what's your setup?
I know it's said that benchmarks aren't important, but they at least have to mean something with performance.
So, what are you running?
Try flashing franco.Kernel. Makes a huge difference!
Before franco: 2204
After franco: 2932 (Quadrant Standard)
ROM: PACman ROM, 1.2 GHz
Seriously, there should be a thread stickied for the bench freaks, all in the same place. *sigh*
Sent from my Nexus
bk201doesntexist said:
Seriously, there should be a thread stickied for the bench freaks, all in the same place. *sigh*
Sent from my Nexus
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is one. Just needs sticky-ing.
Beauenheim said:
I know it's said that benchmarks aren't important, but they at least have to mean something with performance.
So, what are you running?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
See, the thing is, benchmarks really do mean nothing. Benchmarks don't affect how well your device performs. If it runs fast, it runs fast-- you don't need the benchmark to know that.
Sent from my Mahjong Nexus
Beauenheim said:
I know it's said that benchmarks aren't important, but they at least have to mean something with performance.
So, what are you running?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah. Because being able to crunch 110,000,000 triangles vs 90,000,000 has real world implications.
Yay! It's been a while since we've had a thread to remind us how useless benchmarks are and offer us all an opportunity to debate about it, yet again.:good:
I make my words what Chainfire said, but globaly.
If you trust benchmark results, you'll know that running naked in the garden for 5mins will affects performance by 20%
Neat, alright.
So absolutely nothing?
That really doesn't make any sense to me. Those 90,000,000 triangles being processed will at least show me how well it will do in a game, to a degree, right?
Not in any way you could actually notice. That was also an extreme hyperbole as far as differences go. To be totally honest, the only real value of benchmarks is stress testing an OC but even then there are better ways.
063_XOBX said:
Not in any way you could actually notice. That was also an extreme hyperbole as far as differences go. To be totally honest, the only real value of benchmarks is stress testing an OC but even then there are better ways.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well alright, thanks for your insight. I've been in the android game for awhile but I don't know a lot of these things.
i want to buy this phone what do you think about this phone ?
s27moto said:
i want to buy this phone what do you think about this phone ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Very nice phone with great specs and a super screen. We own 5 of these units (large family) and they all run very smooth. I would recomend it to anyone. This community on the other hand, well not so great. A lot of snooty peeps on here whining about noob this and misplaced that. If you check my signature you can see im no stranger to these forums and I can tell you I have never encountered so many mods and people closing threads and being rude. So if you can live with the community support until the phone becomes more popular and the forum gets straitened out then id say go for it. Just remember that there wont be much custom stuff for months to come. Thecubed sounds like he is coming here though so hope is alive.
conan1600 said:
Very nice phone with great specs and a super screen. We own 5 of these units (large family) and they all run very smooth. I would recomend it to anyone. This community on the other hand, well not so great. A lot of snooty peeps on here whining about noob this and misplaced that. If you check my signature you can see im no stranger to these forums and I can tell you I have never encountered so many mods and people closing threads and being rude. So if you can live with the community support until the phone becomes more popular and the forum gets straitened out then id say go for it. Just remember that there wont be much custom stuff for months to come. Thecubed sounds like he is coming here though so hope is alive.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tend to read other forums and the people are down right rude to each other. and Lord please don't say that your s4 or HTC one have a build problem or some kind of possible defect those people will come down on you with the wrath of God. sometimes I do feel like people's comment go way to far but overall it's cool here maybe because there isn't much going on yet but let's hope this group of people can keep supporting each other.
Sent from my LG-E980 using xda premium
I have also had a ton of phones, looked at the s4 and the htc one, and the OG Pro is by far the best out of the lineup in my opinion. I am very picky about my phones, and so far it has been near perfect, wireless charging is nice to.
s27moto said:
i want to buy this phone what do you think about this phone ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
One other thing you may want to consider is if your watching benchmark reviews dont pay attention to them atm. The antutu scores are about right but mostly everything else is way off. This phone benches very close to s4 with a larger screen. I think perhaps they were benching with power saver or something to get that low.
Benchmarks are a waste of time. My Samsung infuse is still blazing fast.
Sent from my LG-E980 using xda app-developers app
conan1600 said:
One other thing you may want to consider is if your watching benchmark reviews dont pay attention to them atm. The antutu scores are about right but mostly everything else is way off. This phone benches very close to s4 with a larger screen. I think perhaps they were benching with power saver or something to get that low.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
not sure what benchmarks you have seen. but,the 12048 quadrant score I saw earlier today makes this phone a benchmarking beast
whycali said:
not sure what benchmarks you have seen. but,the 12048 quadrant score I saw earlier today makes this phone a benchmarking beast
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are several pro vs s4 vs one vids that have posted quadrants of a little over 8k. Way low on and totally inaccurate. Ive benched all 5 of ours and they hit 12k each time. The gpu is a bit lower end than s4 speeds but as we know pro has a much larger screen thus slightly decreased scores.
is this phone have fast touch ? because in gs3 when i touch the apps icons it's slow to open not fast touch like gs2 what about optimus g pro ?
s27moto said:
is this phone have fast touch ? because in gs3 when i touch the apps icons it's slow to open not fast touch like gs2 what about optimus g pro ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The OGPro is extreamly responsive. Any native app opens very fast. As for 3rd party apps- I personally have no complaints but at times it might depend on the app...even thogh the possessor is one of the best out there and no app should cause a slow down.
On the other hand, I come from a SGSII and this phone is a killer...I love it so much!!!
I've never even thought that I will buy an LG but Sammy got me so tired of the look and feel of the UI and without tweeks I was not happy... This one though-I'll keep even without bootloader unlocked
But, to each their own
Sent from my LG-F240L using xda app-developers app
conan1600 said:
One other thing you may want to consider is if your watching benchmark reviews dont pay attention to them atm. The antutu scores are about right but mostly everything else is way off. This phone benches very close to s4 with a larger screen. I think perhaps they were benching with power saver or something to get that low.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's not powersaver, it's something like thermal cap. If you want to see better bench scores you may do this http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2296447 . I saw as much as 12900 points in Quadrant on my unit
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2085915&page=3
Also G Pro is drop proof http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2291728
My own unit dropped from 1m height from top of my launder machine on ceramic tile floor, slipped from the rags. No dumps, no scratches, no cracks whatsoever from that drop
---------- Post added at 04:10 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:06 PM ----------
s27moto said:
i want to buy this phone what do you think about this phone ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You may want to read some topics like http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2325843 http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2324250 http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2329253
http://forums.androidcentral.com/lg...mus-g-pro-review-me-wpcentral-ambassador.html
http://forums.androidcentral.com/lg-optimus-g-pro/286501-sleeper-phone-2013-a.html
http://forums.androidcentral.com/lg...-previous-htc-one-previous-sgs4-t-mobile.html
Plenty of owners' reviews around
thanks all friend i got my answer
Hey ...
I just got my HTC 10 from Taiwan (HTC M10h)...
It already received a software update 1.30.709.x ...
The benchmark scores on both AnTuTu and Quadrant aren't that impressive (in relation to the competition) besides repeated tries ...
I know the benchmark Scores are nothing to do with routine usage but they do point out the hardware and software cohesion ...
Please share your benchmark scores here and let the discussion opened on this controversial topic of Benchmark Scoring and Real World Performance
I'm waiting for someone to run PCMark's Work benchmark on the 10. Would you bother doing that?
5707
pwned all other devices -Rom - LeeDroid nightly build temp 33*C
lagittaja said:
I'm waiting for someone to run PCMark's Work benchmark on the 10. Would you bother doing that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
got 6001
SacredDeviL666 said:
pwned all other devices -Rom - LeeDroid nightly build temp 33*C
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I haven't got this much score till now ....
drmoeed said:
I haven't got this much score till now ....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what rom you on?
SacredDeviL666 said:
what rom you on?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stock 1.30.709.1
drmoeed said:
Stock 1.30.709.1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Welcome to XDA use custom roms, stock always has a disadvantage of under performing due to various reasons....
SacredDeviL666 said:
Welcome to XDA use custom roms, stock always has a disadvantage of under performing due to various reasons....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On which ROM are you ...
I'd LeeDroid my fone in a day or two ...
drmoeed said:
On which ROM are you ...
I'd LeeDroid my fone in a day or two ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeaps at the moment LeeDroid.. and this is the only custom rom as of now
SacredDeviL666 said:
Welcome to XDA use custom roms, stock always has a disadvantage of under performing due to various reasons....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually, it has been like that for many years but in recent years I've noticed rom makers just inserting build.props, unit.d, etc and claiming better battery life and "smoother". Stock has always had the most balance between the two, as tuned by HTC's developers versus a copy and paster who has no idea what the scripts do. Once saw failed keylogger-type insert attempt a while ago by someone nobody has heard of.
I've even seen some "kernel devs" inflate the UX numbers to make the total score seem higher while all other areas are actually much lower than standard.
What I'm trying to say is pick what you run on your phone wisely. Many of the roms nowadays are actually sub-par compared to stock. "Custom" doesn't mean better. What sets rom's apart from each other now are customizations availble.
Sent from my HTC6545LVW using Tapatalk
richii0207 said:
Actually, it has been like that for many years but in recent years I've noticed rom makers just inserting build.props, unit.d, etc and claiming better battery life and "smoother". Stock has always had the most balance between the two, as tuned by HTC's developers versus a copy and paster who has no idea what the scripts do. Once saw failed keylogger-type insert attempt a while ago by someone nobody has heard of.
I've even seen some "kernel devs" inflate the UX numbers to make the total score seem higher while all other areas are lower than standard.
What I'm trying to say is pick what you run on your phone wisely. Many of the roms nowadays are actually sub-par compared to stock. "Custom" doesn't mean better. What sets rom's apart from each other now are customizations availble.
Sent from my HTC6545LVW using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
agreed on a lot of aspect... for me as an end user custom roms are better than stocks and yes i agree a lot aren't actual development but then you need to identify....
for me its a statement of using the way i want to always vs what company dictates the way you should operate which is in most stock roms...
SacredDeviL666 said:
pwned all other devices -Rom - LeeDroid nightly build temp 33*C
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not all of them
Sent from my HTC 10 using XDA-Developers mobile app
TopoX84 said:
Not all of them
Sent from my HTC 10 using XDA-Developers mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hola ...
Thats impressive ...
Yet to achieve a score as high as this with my 10 ...
HTC 10
1.53.617.x ...
Stock ...
@TopoX84 what's the individual scores and what was the battery temperature?
I've easily gotten ~6400 PCMark scores on my 10. Bonestock but that was of course from a really cold state.
And let's not forget my bad SD820 voltage bin (worst I've seen) which doesn't help the matter at all.
I'd like to see someone with EX kernel run PCMark Work a couple of times on their 10, cold and hot state, idk closer to room temp (25-30?) and something like 38-40C?.
@Haldi4803 ?
I was happy with a random test I did at work the other day, this phone is by far the fastest responding phone ive ever owned/ used.
Still on stock Kernel. Not done yet with all the baseline Benchmarking.
Haldi4803 said:
Still on stock Kernel. Not done yet with all the baseline Benchmarking.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry
I mixed up you and @hamdir
I get 140,000 on AnTuTu, stock ROM and kernel.